Could I set an Access Password for the Common Folder ?
I create a Common Folder, named as Archive. Could I set an Access Password for the Common Folder ? The Bat! v1.62CE on Windows 2000 SP3. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Could I set an Access Password for the Common Folder ?
Hello Zimoo, I create a Common Folder, named as Archive. Could I set an Access Password for the Common Folder ? No you can't. But you can always define a pseudo account to be used as your archive and set an access password to that account. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, James Olsen wrote: There's also free Win32 version that you can very easily use with ANY email client called SAProxy (http://saproxy.bloomba.com/). It will scan messages and flag them as SPAM (based on your configuration) as they are downloaded from your server to your client. I hadn't heard about this program before although I know about spam assasin. After reading this recommendation I installed it and it does work very well. It doesn't catch all spam but I'd say about 90%, and it is very easy to setup. On a semi-related note, does anyone know if it's possible to setup a global filter of some sort that applies to all accounts? It's a little tedious to have to setup the spam filter on all seven of my accounts. -- Tim Fountain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.tfountain.co.uk/ Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Plug-in/Feature Request to allow one to define a plugin to dosomething on a message or group of messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tim Fountain [TF] wrote:'
TF On a semi-related note, does anyone know if it's possible to setup a
TF global filter of some sort that applies to all accounts?
No. This isn't possible. It will likely be possible in later
versions.
TF It's a little tedious to have to setup the spam filter on all seven
TF of my accounts.
With regards to spam filtering, it's best to place the spam filters
at the bottom of the incoming filters list. In this way, TB!
checks messages last with the spam filters.
If you used a global filter, how would TB! know where to apply the
filter. In fact, it may very well apply global filters first.
I do have a few filters that could be applied globally. However,
I wouldn't do so with my spam filter since it's position in the
filter list is important.
- --
-=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator}
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE+WMVmV8nrYCsHF+IRAq56AJ9rQnvwBSlHXL7ZNfzkZu0a7BgCegCeMlwc
hyviFw1Rf0V4vacNw1fBlm8=
=4cjg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Global filters (was:: Plug-in/Feature Request...)
Hello Allie, On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:58:11 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 19:58 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: If you used a global filter, how would TB! know where to apply the filter. In fact, it may very well apply global filters first. Hm. I would think in each account you give each global filter a position (or not, if you don't want the filter to be applied to that account). In a central location, maybe under QuickTemplates, you update/maintain the global filters centrally, and each update of course applies to each account in which this global filter is in the filter list, and exactly at the position in the order of filters where the global filter is mentioned. Am I making sense? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing. -- Redd Foxx Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Global filters (was:: Plug-in/Feature Request...)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote:'
TF Hm. I would think in each account you give each global filter a
TF position (or not, if you don't want the filter to be applied to that
TF account). In a central location, maybe under QuickTemplates, you
TF update/maintain the global filters centrally, and each update of
TF course applies to each account in which this global filter is in the
TF filter list, and exactly at the position in the order of filters
TF where the global filter is mentioned.
TF Am I making sense?
You seem to be describing a sort of like 'common filter' system
dialog.
You define your common filters in this dialog. You then add them as
needed to your various accounts. If you need to make a change to a
common filter, it would then propagate to all the accounts where the
filter is added.
This system would be easier than the current one, only in so far as
updating or changing the filter is concerned, wouldn't it? You still
have to go to each account and add it, the same as copy and pasting
in the current system.
Global filters really should be just a matter of creating the filter
and whammo, it works on all accounts. No need to be adding them to
each account. If you need anything other than this, then go the
currently implemented method of copying and pasting the filter to
the accounts which you wish the filter to be applied.
- --
-=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator}
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE+WM1KV8nrYCsHF+IRArB0AJ98k1xLt/zjfoDpygfsVr+ctCeMyQCg3RqF
KyUvkbeDPv4gB9T157bK5iw=
=TY0e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Global filters
Hello Allie, On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:31:52 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 20:31 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: You seem to be describing a sort of like 'common filter' system dialog. You define your common filters in this dialog. You then add them as needed to your various accounts. If you need to make a change to a common filter, it would then propagate to all the accounts where the filter is added. Yes, this is what I mean. This system would be easier than the current one, only in so far as updating or changing the filter is concerned, wouldn't it? You still have to go to each account and add it, the same as copy and pasting in the current system. No it isn't. If I add any filter string, for example an email address or a key word, I won't have to go to all accounts. I would update only at one place. That's the point. Global filters really should be just a matter of creating the filter and whammo, it works on all accounts. No need to be adding them to each account. Please explain how this should work. Let's say under Options I have a menu item Global filters, and I create a filter there. What would it do? Could I except accounts from this filter or from all global filters, like I can with check all? If you need anything other than this, then go the currently implemented method of copying and pasting the filter to the accounts which you wish the filter to be applied. This is what I am doing, and it is troublesome to have to add the same address as an alternative filter string to several filters across various accounts. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. A bean supper will be held on Tuesday evening in the church hall. Music will follow. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Could I set an Access Password for the Common Folder ?
Hi Miguel, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 6:22:50 AM, you wrote: No you can't. But you can always define a pseudo account to be used as your archive and set an access password to that account. That's a very good suggestion. I'm planning on setting up the same thing on my work computer. As a side note, I originally set up my archive folders within each account (in a folder separate from the Inbox), but it really slowed down opening and closing The Bat, even with compression. I found that moving these archive folders to a dummy account *really* sped things up. -- Best regards, Kim Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi all, I've noticed that from time to time, in a message long enough to need a scroll bar, there isn't one. At other times the scroll bar is there (the one on the right side of the screen). When it isn't there, I have to use the mouse and force the cursor to the top of the message so that I can view it. Has anyone else noticed this? I'm using The Bat 1.62i (Personal) with Windows XP Home. Thanks. :) -- Best regards, Kim Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi Kim, on Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:30:11 -0500GMT (23.02.03, 15:30 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : K I've noticed that from time to time, in a message long enough to need K a scroll bar, there isn't one. Are you sure it is long enough? I only have see behavior when the message would fit in the window, but for some unknown reason only the lower part is visible. K When it isn't there, I have to use the mouse and force the cursor to K the top of the message so that I can view it. You can use the arrow-up key as well. :-) -- Cheers Peter Famous last words - Don't worry, I can handle it. Winamp currently playing: Chemical Brothers - Hey Boy Hey Girl Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi folks, on Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:00:45 +0100GMT (23.02.03, 16:00 +0100GMT here), I wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PM Are you sure it is long enough? I only have see behavior when the ^^^ seen this PM message would fit in the window, but for some unknown reason only the PM lower part is visible. -- Cheers Peter If your attack is going well, then it's an ambush... Winamp currently playing: JOHN HIATT - I'LL NEVER GET OVER YOU Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Global filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote:'
This system would be easier than the current one, only in so far as
updating or changing the filter is concerned, wouldn't it? You still
have to go to each account and add it, the same as copy and pasting
in the current system.
TF No it isn't. If I add any filter string, for example an email address
TF or a key word, I won't have to go to all accounts. I would update only
TF at one place. That's the point.
Yes, I know but:
My point is that every time someone asks how to make all message
list columns look the same, we have to start off by saying, 'I'm
afraid that you'll have to first go through all folders you wish to
have the same setting and toggle on the switch 'Use account default
column settings' ' The user with a lot of folders is never
really pleased to hear this, even though they don't have to do it
again.
With your model, for each filter, I'd have to go to each account I
wish to add it and then place the filter etc. Not much different
from the current method of initial setup. I know that subsequent
modification of the filter would be made easier.
A 'paste-linked' (name just invented g) option would do what you
want. In this way the pasted filter copy would be linked to the
original and vice/versa. Modifying one filter would then modify the
other. A flag of sorts could be used to indicate that a particular
filter is linked to a copy in other accounts.
TF Please explain how this should work. Let's say under Options I have
TF a menu item Global filters, and I create a filter there. What
TF would it do?
It would be applied to all accounts. It could be set to be applied
before or after all other filters have been run.
I just created a filter that I wanted global. I created one that
would move messages containing a particular string to a particular
common folder. I want it run on all accounts. I had to copy it to
each accounts incoming filter set. It would have been nice to just
create the filter as a global one and that's it. No having to open
other accounts and adding it.
TF Could I except accounts from this filter or from all global filters,
TF like I can with check all?
Yes, this would be necessary. However, I dislike the concept of
still having to go to each account and inserting what's supposed to
be a global filter. It's not really global then .. more common.
If you need anything other than this, then go the currently
implemented method of copying and pasting the filter to the accounts
which you wish the filter to be applied.
TF This is what I am doing, and it is troublesome to have to add the
TF same address as an alternative filter string to several filters
TF across various accounts.
Exactly. It's not nice having to do it when it isn't necessary.
- --
-=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator}
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: My Public Keys - http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
iD8DBQE+WOXmV8nrYCsHF+IRAhD0AKCWnhqEjoTToEZ586NuThn5ucHNuACg+mXs
OQMUvxuLt8fiFw2tStQazLk=
=zu1z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi Peter, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 10:00:45 AM, you wrote: Are you sure it is long enough? I only have see behavior when the message would fit in the window, but for some unknown reason only the lower part is visible. I've seen the behavior you've mentioned too, but yes, I'm sure. Even after I scroll up so the top part of the message is visible (which would make the bottom part of the message below the visible part of the screen), the scroll bar still doesn't appear. However, like I'd mentioned, it only happens *some* of the time, but not *all* of the time. You can use the arrow-up key as well. :-) I have. I just didn't mention that one. I use either the mouse (in my case a cordless trackball) or the arrow-up key. However, for me, it's usually easier and quicker to use the trackball. :) Thanks for your help. -- Best regards, Kim Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi Peter, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 10:00:45 AM, you wrote: Are you sure it is long enough? I only have see behavior when the message would fit in the window, but for some unknown reason only the lower part is visible. Well, now that I think about it, maybe I'm *not* so sure. This only seems to happen when I'm replying to a message. I'll keep an eye on it for awhile to see if your suggestion is what I'm truly seeing. I have a feeling now that it might be. Thanks. :) -- Best regards, Kim Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: html mailto bug
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Saturday, November 30, 2002 at 09:46:55GMT + (which was 4:46 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: MDP In the definition lies the solution. There is a simple fix to all of MDP this that involves neither TB nor the web site author: MDP This is process is handled by the defined mailto: handler as MDP specified in the registry. All you have to do is to add delimiting MDP quotes to the %1 parameter in the definition. MDP Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of mailto is MDP changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double quotes. Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? I've found 12 references to 'mailto' in the registry and 9 of them have the %1 value. I've tried changing EACH of them, one at a time with no effect, other than it BROKE the mailto function in some cases. Please be more specific! -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike He who eats soup with chopsticks will get only noodles and maybe some chunks of stuff. /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1' -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Kim: Sunday, February 23, 2003, 10:49:24 AM, you wrote: K I've seen the behavior you've mentioned too, but yes, I'm sure. Even after K I scroll up so the top part of the message is visible (which would make the K bottom part of the message below the visible part of the screen), the It seems to occur when the original message is longer than a screen, but trimming reduces it to beneath a screen long, but the view does not (for whatever reason) scroll up to show the whole message replied to. My feeling is its related to a missing or flubbed check to see whether the viewing window should be moved upwards after trimming. -- Alexander Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) You are a devil! she sobbed. Not I! he laughed. I was born on this planet long ago. Once, I was a common man, nor have I lost all human attributes in the numberless aeons of my adeptship. A human steeped in the dark arts is greater than a devil. -- RE Howard, The People of the Black Circle Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi Kim, on Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:53:52 -0500GMT (23.02.03, 16:53 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Are you sure it is long enough? I only have see behavior when the message would fit in the window, but for some unknown reason only the lower part is visible. K Well, now that I think about it, maybe I'm *not* so sure. This only K seems to happen when I'm replying to a message. I'll keep an eye on it K for awhile to see if your suggestion is what I'm truly seeing. I have K a feeling now that it might be. Exactly! I had the experience a few minutes ago, when I replied to a post on another list. I hit reply, and according to my template the complete message was quoted. I deleted the quotes unrelated to my reply by selecting them and hit del. The part of the window that would have to be scrolled with the whole text, was still above the screen, but there were no scrollbars, because the remaining text didn't require them. -- Cheers Peter The irony of life is that no one gets out alive... Winamp currently playing: Gary Hoey - Black Magic Woman Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: html mailto bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Spike, 23-Feb-2003, 11:08 -0500 (16:08 UK time) Spike [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP This is process is handled by the defined mailto: handler as MDP specified in the registry. All you have to do is to add MDP delimiting quotes to the %1 parameter in the definition. MDP Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of MDP mailto is changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double MDP quotes. S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+WPcxOeQkq5KdzaARApIsAJ9SpOEbogunlDjZCWVI+BNNShvsawCeOb+4 tUrsbol5UpPzcsLACSuvN+o= =vo6D -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: html mailto bug
Hello Marck D Pearlstone, On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 16:30:39GMT + (which was 11:30 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command Does this change require a reboot? I've had the other changes take place immediately, such as the 'broken' mailto's with other changes I made. Of course I did them singly and changed them back immediately when they didn't work. I still get only KOMP on the subject line. -- Warmest tropical wishes, Spike Wear short sleeves! Support your right to bare arms! /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail \ / If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. XSay NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail! / \ Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML). -- Using TheBat! v1.62i hamstrung by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1' -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, February 23, 2003 12:01:08 PM RE: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally Greetings Peter, On Sunday, February 23, 2003, 10:07:40 AM, you wrote: PM Are you sure it is long enough? I only have see behavior when the PM ^^^ PM seen this PM message would fit in the window, but for some unknown reason only the PM lower part is visible. I'm really missing something here, Peter, I hope. Are you actually posting a reply picking up on a spelling or grammar error and maybe not even from someone who's first language is English (American or British)? I certainly hope this was not your intent but I can fathom no other reason for it based on your two lines quoted above. - -- Regards, DG Raftery Sr. I was only looking at your name tag, honest. The_Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Business Security 6.0 iQA/AwUBPlj/nTaPwvRMcz9cEQL2BwCeKU39FUttfFFI2KZDuNza+DUHDO4AoMyC lKcwjmaV5mxVeeFBio+h3BDt =B7h9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OFF TOPIC: How to update a SMIME certificate?
I received an email from Certum saying We kindly inform that digital ID with serial number: 025451 will expire in 7 days. We would like to invite you to utilize Unizeto CERTUM services for certificate renewal or generation of a new one. Services are available at: http://www.certum.pl; I went to the above website, but I'm not sure what I should do to renew the certificate. Can anyone assist please? -- Best regards, Costas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hello DG, I'm really missing something here, Peter, I hope. Yes, your *are* missing the fact that Peter replied to himself :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
Hi Miguel, on Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:18:24 +0100GMT (23.02.03, 18:18 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I'm really missing something here, Peter, I hope. MAU Yes, your *are* missing the fact that Peter replied to himself :) Thank you, Miguel, you were faster. :-) -- Cheers Peter I.R.S.: We've got what it takes to take what you've got! Winamp currently playing: S.H.E ¤kªB¤Í - ¤Ñ¨Ï¦b°Ûºq Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Global filters
Hello Allie, On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:16:52 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 22:16 +0700 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: TF No it isn't. If I add any filter string, for example an email address TF or a key word, I won't have to go to all accounts. I would update only TF at one place. That's the point. Yes, I know but: OK, you got my point. :-) My point is that every time someone asks how to make all message list columns look the same, we have to start off by saying, 'I'm afraid that you'll have to first go through all folders I agree with you here, but while it is not unusual for people to have 100 folders, I cannot see why anyone would have 100 accounts. With your model, for each filter, I'd have to go to each account I wish to add it and then place the filter etc. Not much different from the current method of initial setup. I know that subsequent modification of the filter would be made easier. The subsequent modification is my point, yes. A 'paste-linked' (name just invented g) option would do what you want. Yes, but I would find a central location, like for QTs, better. Matter of taste, maybe. TF Please explain how this should work. Let's say under Options I have TF a menu item Global filters, and I create a filter there. What TF would it do? I just created a filter that I wanted global. I created one that would move messages containing a particular string to a particular common folder. I want it run on all accounts. I had to copy it to each accounts incoming filter set. It would have been nice to just create the filter as a global one and that's it. No having to open other accounts and adding it. I see your point, too. TF Could I except accounts from this filter or from all global filters, TF like I can with check all? Yes, this would be necessary. This would make it complicated. For each global filter, there would have to be an option in each account to not apply it. Then, in some accounts, I would it applied at the top, in others at the bottom, and again in others somehwere in between. However, I dislike the concept of still having to go to each account and inserting what's supposed to be a global filter. It's not really global then .. more common. The difference between our concepts is just the default setting. In my version, the default is do not apply, and you have to set apply in the accounts were it should be applied. In your version, it is applied in all accounts, and you would have to set do not apply were it shouldn't be. TF This is what I am doing, and it is troublesome to have to add the TF same address as an alternative filter string to several filters TF across various accounts. Exactly. It's not nice having to do it when it isn't necessary. We agree on this one? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Sex is hereditary. If your parents never had it, chances are you won't either. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, February 23, 2003 1:14:10 PM RE: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally Greetings Miguel, On Sunday, February 23, 2003, 12:18:24 PM, you wrote: MAU Yes, your *are* missing the fact that Peter replied to himself :) Then I stand humbly corrected and apologize for my quick post and my old, slow eyes. To Peter, I'm sorry. - -- Regards, DG Raftery Sr. I fought the lawn, and the lawn won! The_Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP for Business Security 6.0 iQA/AwUBPlkP4jaPwvRMcz9cEQKwqgCeMKh6Wh8i5Jil2Yu2qI+cXzet5RMAniGp Iq2LaMJVtWJ4rIDC3hMeQejN =SyA6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
POPFile Problem
I setup POPFile yesterday, and the process went fine, and I began filtering mail with no incident. The logon parameters I set in The Bat, were: Mail Server: 127.0.0.1 User: [mydomain.com]:[my_username] This configuration worked perfectly yesterday, but this morning when I started up my computer, and POPFile, I got an error: -connected to POP3 server -server reports error The response is: -ERR When I set my configuration back to its original settings it worked fine. I confirmed that POPFile was running, and tried fiddling with the parameters in POPFile and in the Bat, but nothing seemed to work The user interface was up and running, as was the Perl console that appears, when POPFfile is running. I already posted a query to my website/ email host, and to the Sourceforge POPFile Forum, but figured the fix might be in The Bat, so I am risking a cross-post, here. the think that has me most puzzled, is that it ran great yesterday, but today, with nothing changed, it doesn't work. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. -wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/ A business is as honest as its advertising. . Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Scroll Bar Disappears Occasionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi DG, on Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:16:04 -0500GMT (23.02.03, 19:16 +0100GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : DRS DRS ***[23.02.03 19:36:51] PGP Signature Status: good DRS To Peter, I'm sorry. No problem. Fully accepted. :-) DRS I fought the lawn, and the lawn won! *lol* Immediately copied to my cookies.txt. :) - -- Cheers Peter Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. Frank Zappa Winamp currently playing: Soft Machine - Dedicated To You But You Weren't Listening -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Key available at http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt iQA/AwUBPlkIuAM2UgbhB3TOEQJ5uwCdERemUGHKDnaZRiQrhPb1dTE9Y4EAn06X 8yBvkmyD8IbE6INYyq4tLQUl =IGsC -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: html mailto bug
Hello Spike, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 5:40:59 PM, you wrote: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command S Does this change require a reboot? I've had the other changes take S place immediately, such as the 'broken' mailto's with other changes I S made. Of course I did them singly and changed them back immediately S when they didn't work. I still get only KOMP on the subject line. I guess so; why should the computer have to read the register at startup, otherwise? -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: POPFile Problem
Hello Robert, The user interface was up and running, as was the Perl console that appears, when POPFfile is running. I always run POPFile in background and there is no Perl console visible to bother me :) the think that has me most puzzled, is that it ran great yesterday, but today, with nothing changed, it doesn't work. Something must have changed, the thing is to find out what. Have you taken a look at both TB's and POPFile logs? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.61 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Hallo, after using The Bat! for some time, I realized that it just doesn't fit my needs, in particular its PIM capabilities are too weak. But what I like very much about The Bat! is its template handling. Now I'm looking for a way to simulate %abtohandle and other variables which refer to the recipient's address book entry in Outlook (2002). The problem is that the Outlook (VBA) Object Model doesn't know something like %abtohandle, as for as I know. Has anyone tried to program such a thing with VBA? I'd be glad for any help or ressource available. Daniel Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Daniel Maier wrote: D after using The Bat! for some time, I realized that it just doesn't fit D my needs, in particular its PIM capabilities are too weak. But what I D like very much about The Bat! is its template handling. Now I'm looking D for a way to simulate %abtohandle and other variables which refer to the D recipient's address book entry in Outlook (2002). The problem is that D the Outlook (VBA) Object Model doesn't know something like %abtohandle, D as for as I know. Has anyone tried to program such a thing with VBA? I'd D be glad for any help or ressource available. You'll be back! -- Regards, John Morse Im not lazy im just motivationally deficient Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Hello Daniel, Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:26:51 PM, you wrote: DM after using The Bat! for some time, I realized that it just doesn't fit DM my needs, in particular its PIM capabilities are too weak. Personally I kicked out Outlook a couple of years ago (and the software some Insurance Companies made me use) because it takes way too much memory. Did you allready try out Time Chaos? http://www.isbister.com/ -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Filters for Spam
Hello ~John, Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:22:26 PM, you wrote: ~ Paul Smithson wrote: P Why you would include a £ symbol ~ Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ? You make a very valid point :))) Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Hello Mark, Monday, February 24, 2003, 1:07:58 AM, you wrote: MP Hello Daniel, etc. Oops, sorry, this was intended as a personal reply, not a reply to the list. I forgot to delete the CC: however... :-( -- Best Whishes, Mark using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: **SPAM** Re: SpamCop Filter Questions
Hello Peter, Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:31:19 PM, you wrote: FN Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised FN as spam. PM Now your spam protection has turned to the opposite: you're spamming PM all TBUDL members... :-( I'm sure it wasn't intended, so check your PM filters! Here, here. Maybe we should all set up a filter to filter out the spam caused by filters that don't filter correctly :) Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Synchronizing The Bat
Hello Marck, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 1:46:34 AM, you wrote: PS I need to do it on a regular basis ... MDP Each synch must be based upon the current state of the mailbase on MDP the system to be update. With every update it receives, the state MDP changes. Furthermore, the state of the updated system may change MDP beyond that of the last know synch point before the next synch is MDP required. And the synch is bidirectional. I used to synch from MDP TB to SecureBat, use it awhile, synch back to TB (new beta), use it MDP awhile, etc. At each synch, the base synch point is moved. A full MDP synch is the only possible way. Even though you (as a reasonable MDP person) knows better, the computer does not. Thank you very much for that excellent response Marck. I really appreciate you taking the time to explain that to me and I can now see why it needs the three steps. Cheers! Paul Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Getting rid of spam using -To-
Hello Group, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 1:12:08 AM, you wrote: MA sends to the trash anything which doesn't have my name MA in the To: ;-) I set up this same filter about a year ago. Anything that it rejects goes in a Probably Spam folder which I check every few weeks. This one filter alone reduced the amount of spam I get by well over 70%. Another 25% is picked up by other manually set-up filters and the rest takes little time to delete manually. Regards Paul P.S. I also have several filters before the To filter that allows through the e-mails that are not addressed to me, but that I know I want to receive. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: html mailto bug
Marck- Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:30:39 AM, you wrote: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* effect on my Win2k system. I posted the question earlier to see if anyone else could confirm or deny this working but got no response, so it's just down to you and me now. I'd love to have someone else try this and post the results here so we can tell if there's something weird with my system. I haven't seen this hack documented anywhere else - where'd you come across it? (...if that isn't stretching the memory cells too far...) -Mark Wieder Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Getting rid of spam using -To-
Hi Paul, Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:03:26 AM, you wrote: PS P.S. I also have several filters before the To filter that PS allows through the e-mails that are not addressed to me, but PS that I know I want to receive. Yes. The important thing with using filtering is getting them in the right order in the Sorting Office. Where I have to kill whole domains I usually send them to my Zpam folder (I have my folders in alphabetic order, so it makes it the bottom folder). And things like filters for this group are right at the top so the Blank or not me To: filter only catches ones that aren't filtered previously. And they are invariably spam as I usually have a quick check in the Trash before I flush it. ;-) -- Best regards, Mike Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: html mailto bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, @23-Feb-2003, 17:24 -0800 (01:24 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry? MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command MW However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* MW effect on my Win2k system. It has exactly the right effect on my Win2k Pro system. It works. ... snip MW ... I haven't seen this hack documented anywhere else - where'd MW you come across it? (...if that isn't stretching the memory MW cells too far...) It's not in the archive. I may have come up with it myself. I know I reported the lack of Double Quotes in the default registry key as a bug. It was rejected and the report closed on the grounds that it invalidates URLs that already include quotes. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE+WZIHOeQkq5KdzaARAlWLAJ45ahlIEQXu/8PPGtBD0BUFGwJ7KwCgyv1v yndeMYUCzCM0Etu/6WTNgL4= =ylD4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SOT: %abtohandle and others with Outlook (2002)
Hello Daniel Thank you for your email dated Sunday, February 23, 2003, 7:26:51 PM, in which you wrote: DM in particular its PIM capabilities are too weak. It's an email client, not a PIM. -- Regards William www.residues.info Flying with The Bat! www.ritlabs.com/the_bat Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete from server
Hi, Does TB have the capacity to create a filter that will check for the filter conditions and if met delete the message from server. Or at least delete the message without moving it to Trash. I remember when I was using OE in my Novice days it had this choice. Yes, when you create your filter (Account, Sorting Office), you see a row of tabs, the one with Actions on it is the one you want. Select that, and then read through the list. There is an option to delete mail from server. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Delete from server
Hello Mean, On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:58:28 +0530 GMT (24/02/03, 13:28 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: Does TB have the capacity to create a filter that will check for the filter conditions and if met delete the message from server. Yes. Go to Account / Sorting Office / Selective Download / New... and try the Kill option under the Advanced tab. However, I don't use this, for two reasons: 1.) TB will download all headers to see if an Selective Download filter string is met, even if there is only one such filter, before downloading the messages. If you have a fast connection, this will be irrelevant for you though. 2.) A message killed on (i.e. deleted from) the server is gone. If there is a mistake in your filtering string, you will never know. Therefore, if you download all messages and put those meeting the filter criteria into a special folder which you can review at a later time, you might catch false positives. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
