Instant Address Pop-Up Was: (no subject)
Hello Chuck, Friday, July 29, 2005, 10:43:45 AM, you wrote: CS CS Hello Bat Lovers, CS First let me introduce my self. I have used TB! since 1.3x. I CS haven't been on the discussion list in a long while and have just CS updated to 3.5x for 2.x (totally missed 3.0). CS I have run across an annoyance. On the create a message button, CS when I select favorites (arrow to the right ) it seems that TB! CS totally ignores the favorites and groups listed in the address CS book. This worked beautifully in 2.x. You need to Edit the Group Properties and add a check mark in the Add Items to the Instant Addresses Pop-Up. Then make sure you have a check mark beside each entry you want. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Instant Address Pop-Up Was: (no subject)
Hello Stuart, Friday, July 29, 2005, 11:53:39 AM, you wrote: CS I have run across an annoyance. On the create a message button, CS when I select favorites (arrow to the right ) it seems that TB! CS totally ignores the favorites and groups listed in the address CS book. This worked beautifully in 2.x. You need to Edit the Group Properties and add a check mark in the Add Items to the Instant Addresses Pop-Up. Then make sure you have a check mark beside each entry you want. That did it. Really strange that the upgrade did not migrate that option. Thanks for the help. -- Best regards, Chuckmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Views threads by subject - apply colour to subject line?
Hæ! Is it possible to apply a colour to the subject line when threading by subject? It would be nice, if I could get rid of the subject line completely and thread the messages like the old behaviour of View Threads by Subject... :-( -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.5.25 Professional K9 v1.28 | Windows XP Pro (v5.1.2600) Listening to: Omar Faruk Tekbilek - Three Last Words Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Recreate the former thread by subject...
Hæ! Is it possible to recreate the former thread by subject behaviour? I do not like the new one. I set up the old one as View threads by subject and ordered as Received, desc. and showing the latest email in a thread as the first in the line. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.5 Professional K9 v1.28 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Are you tired of making TYPOs in the Subject?
Hello all, If yes, please support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1229 -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5 Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, 8:12:37 PM, Chris wrote: However, Ritlabs has a semi-strict policy of not modifying messages after they have been received. which is STUPID. It should be possible to modify subject lines, correct threads and make notes in messages, or fix broken shortcuts, or anything else one wants to do with the contents of a message. Yes, I know there are cumbersome ways to work around some of these problems, but the fact that some people think it would be wrong for them to make changes in their mail boxes should not prevent the addition of functionality which makes the program more useful, and working with email more efficient for other users! -- Dwight A. Corrin Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello Chris, The Bat! needs some built-in functionality to add messages to a given thread or remove them from one for those instances when the incoming message is missing the appropriate headers. It also needs some way to break a message out of a thread for those instances when someone simply replies and changes the subject when starting a new topic. See my reply to your mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello Chris, Please add your support to this feature request so that we can fix broken treads easily. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1440 Manual re-threading was introduced in beta 3.0.9.6 (we are currently testing 3.0.9.17) and it works. Although, as I have written in the beta list, I personally don't like or agree with the way they have implemented it. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello Chris, I would prefer you reply to me on the list and not by PM. Manual re-threading was introduced in beta 3.0.9.6 (we are currently testing 3.0.9.17) and it works. Although, as I have written in the beta list, I personally don't like or agree with the way they have implemented it. How has it been implemented? What don't you like? Perhaps it can be changed before it is released if a better solution is provided. I explained all of this in a long message in the TBBeta list on 22-March-2005. If you are interested, you can look in the TBBeta archives for Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with Subject Some thoughts about Threading, manual re-threading, etc. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.9.17 Return Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Miguel A. Urech @ 2005-Apr-21 8:39:32 PM Difference between threaded by subject and reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] How has it been implemented? What don't you like? Perhaps it can be changed before it is released if a better solution is provided. I explained all of this in a long message in the TBBeta list on 22-March-2005. If you are interested, you can look in the TBBeta archives for Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with Subject Some thoughts about Threading, manual re-threading, etc. This can be found at: http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com/msg59050.html This thread is veering into beta territory, but I hope it still remains pertinent. From what I have read, your concerns are very real one; ones that I am sure other users would have. I fully agree that there should be some way to thread only by references. You complaints about re-threading not being preserved is also valid. However, Ritlabs has a semi-strict policy of not modifying messages after they have been received. Perhaps a secondary delta message base is needed that can store changes, like manual re-threading or modifications to other headers like the date or the subject. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Accessing a POP3 mailbox. To define recursion, we must first define recursion. pgpXBKV5gXFrH.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello all, Some ppl on that list talk about sorting emails by reference and I'm trying to know the difference between sorting by subject and sorting by references Can someone enlight me please? I have tried and I don't see the difference thanks -- The Final Cut TheBat 3.0.2.10 http://finalcut.ca/finalcut.asc pgpcy3r9LtwTw.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello The, Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 1:00:30 PM, you wrote: TFC Some ppl on that list talk about sorting emails by TFC reference and I'm trying to know the difference between sorting TFC by subject and sorting by references TFC Can someone enlight me please? TFC I have tried and I don't see the difference If you select F9 while viewing a message it will open the Message source. In this source you will find a header called References:. If you thread by References it will use the contents of this section to thread your messages. If you thread by subject it just uses the contents of whatever is in your subject line. In a lot of cases this looks the same, but if two people at separate times use the same subject they will thread on each other even though they are not really related. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.9.17 Return on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello The Final Cut everyone else, on 20-Apr-2005 at 20:00 you (The Final Cut) wrote: Some ppl on that list talk about sorting emails by reference and I'm trying to know the difference between sorting by subject and sorting by references Can someone enlight me please? I have tried and I don't see the difference Threading by reference is more precise than threading by subject, because not only the subject, but the actual message that is replied to is used to show the message in the thread. You'll notice the difference in threads that are running longer. You can precisely see which message is the parent of what reply, etc. But... threading by reference is very likely to NOT work anywhere outside of the TB lists because people use crappy webmailers that strip the references and/or in-reply-to header (aol, yahoo, hotmail, 1und1, etc. etc. all break the threading) And... threading by subject is likely to not work very well either, on other mailing lists it is a common habit to change the subject any time whenever people feel like it... even the most simple threading mechanisms stumble over those messages and can't sort them to a usable position in an existing conversation. The wish to have all messages in a threaded view so you can come back later and follow the flow of a conversation is nothing more than a wish... a wish that can drive you insane. :-) Its a shame. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) If you should say, 'It is enough, I have reached perfection,' all is lost. For it is the function of perfection to make one know one's imperfection. -- St. Augustine Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Alexander S. Kunz @ 2005-Apr-20 3:02:33 PM Difference between threaded by subject and reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The wish to have all messages in a threaded view so you can come back later and follow the flow of a conversation is nothing more than a wish... a wish that can drive you insane. :-) Its a shame. Please add your support to this feature request so that we can fix broken treads easily. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1440 -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Accessing a POP3 mailbox. Today's Oxymoron: Alone together pgpvNuHHXIzr3.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello Chris On Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 5:28:06 PM +0400 GMT You wrote: C Alexander S. Kunz @ 2005-Apr-20 3:02:33 PM C Difference between threaded by subject and C reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The wish to have all messages in a threaded view so you can come back later and follow the flow of a conversation is nothing more than a wish... a wish that can drive you insane. :-) Its a shame. C Please add your support to this feature request so that we can fix C broken treads easily. C https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1440 I am not sure to understand this wish Can you elaborate? I might be interested to add my 2 cents too! -- The Final Cut TheBat 3.0.2.10 http://finalcut.ca/finalcut.asc pgppNSjibLkxh.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
Hello Chris everyone else, on 20-Apr-2005 at 23:28 you (Chris) wrote: Please add your support to this feature request so that we can fix broken treads easily. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1440 I already did, on August 19th. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: Ambient Head (9:48) by Datacide from the album 'Datacide II' Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Difference between threaded by subject and reference
The Final Cut @ 2005-Apr-20 5:38:01 PM Difference between threaded by subject and reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1440 I am not sure to understand this wish Can you elaborate? I might be interested to add my 2 cents too! The Bat! needs some built-in functionality to add messages to a given thread or remove them from one for those instances when the incoming message is missing the appropriate headers. It also needs some way to break a message out of a thread for those instances when someone simply replies and changes the subject when starting a new topic. Hope this helps. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Accessing a POP3 mailbox. This message transmitted on 100% recycled electrons. pgpFulDdslOEE.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Morphing subject selective filter
Hello rich, On 24 March 2005 at 11:06:24 GMT -0500 (which was 17:06:24 where I live), rich gregory wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of Morphing subject selective filter: Hello Bat-Folk! Using TB! v2.12.00... Since the filter interface will not let me selectively delete based on text in the body of the message I need to filter on a morphing subject line... Is there a way to add a selective download filter that will check for a match on, say 15, out of 20 or so characters in the subject line? I am getting hundreds of these a day: wicked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep you going wicked drug)s to keep you going wicked dr*ugs to keep you going wicked dr]ugs to keep you going wicked dru$gs to keep you going wicked drug$s to keep you going wicked dr/ugs to keep you going Sometimes the word wicked is fudged, sometimes other parts of the subject, but the phraseology is the same always. Thx RG Why don't you use a good spamfilter to get rid off these messages? In that case you only have to use a simple filter to move all these message to your Junk Mail folder. -- Best regards, Dick ___ There are three ways to get things done: do it yourself, hire someone to do it, or tell your kids not to do it. Using The Bat! v3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Morphing subject selective filter
Hello rich gregory everyone else, on 24-Mrz-2005 at 17:06 you (rich gregory) wrote: Sometimes the word wicked is fudged, sometimes other parts of the subject, but the phraseology is the same always. Get K9 from http://www.keir.net or any other Bayes filter based spam filter (K9 is very lean very good, running at 99.39% efficieny here at the moment). One week of training and the majority of spam will be recognized automagically. Promised. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The present, like a note in music, is nothing but as it appertains to what is past and what is to come. -- Walter Savage Landor Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Morphing subject selective filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 24 Mar 2005, @ @ at 11:06:24 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: Hello Bat-Folk! Hello Bat-Individual! Using TB! v2.12.00... Glad to meet you, a User of a noble taste and refinement, me too. Since the filter interface will not let me selectively delete based on text in the body of the message I need to filter on a morphing subject line... Is there a way to add a selective download filter that will check for a match on, say 15, out of 20 or so characters in the subject line? I am getting hundreds of these a day: wicked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep you going wicked drug)s to keep you going wicked dr*ugs to keep you going wicked dr]ugs to keep you going wicked dru$gs to keep you going wicked drug$s to keep you going wicked dr/ugs to keep you going Sometimes the word wicked is fudged, sometimes other parts of the subject, but the phraseology is the same always. There is no irresolvable problem. Always there is some way which leads to somewhere. If there's none, we make it. Watch now please... You would just to add this common s to keep you going part to Signal strings and to check radio button Entire header. Under Advanced tab the Action is Kill and Detection method is Any string match. Being that the subject string is in the header, manipulable by SD filters, it will catch the beasts and will destroy them all, right in the front of your digital doors. BUT, please pay attention to few things here... 1. If ``sometimes the word wicked is fudged, sometimes other parts of the subject'' then this common part will not be just that common, and this shift of mine will not work. 2. That was the reason (these mutable fudges, which are practically uncatchable by any regex-es) for me to change entire style/approach, and to start filtering against the *way of addressing me* (which saved me of an *enormous* amount of SPAM). If you are interested in such sort of strategy, you might find possibly useful to examine the thread Again,why only TB built-in filters are enough to fight all sorts of SPAM, starting with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. 3. If you follow the road No. 2, you would have to remodel a wee bit your mailing routines and these of (some of) your correspondents. 4. That's it. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://bardo.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 204 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector via Wine... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFCQwDZ9q62QPd3XuIRAgTJAJ9Vg6oGY263B/gxkvrRRiLpSOT4UACgl6kP Mck+jye2p4Pw/CRaXEfhL3U= =KRTa -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Morphing subject selective filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 24 Mar 2005, @ @ at 11:06:24 -0500, when rich gregory wrote: Random tagline: If women didnt exist; all the money in the world would have no meaning. - Aristotle Onassis (1906-1975) Opps! I forgot to comment this one... we(e) apologize. 5. Yep. The universal attractiveness. (-: - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://bardo.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 204 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector via Wine... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFCQwbu9q62QPd3XuIRAnN3AJ9TbYLpAKVFkfHiA6+pqmX4Kc5C7wCghoKo /ATUh6W1n/ubXYEwGBb1Two= =/PNb -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
Hi On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:54:23 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], David Calvarese wrote: My only real issue with buying it is that I need to use it on 2 PCs. my work PC (for personal email) and my home PC (for the same). But I'm only ever going to be signing on one at a time. As far as I understand the freeware licence, you could fill your entire house with computers and use PGP on all of them simultaneously, provided it's a not-for-profit activity. -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
Hi On Friday 18 February 2005 at 8:02:16 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. I think you would have to inline sign, not PGP/MIME for the sig delimiter to be affected. Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, Of course, some of us prefer inline signing... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
Hey All, I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any way to fix that? -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any DC way to fix that? Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own implementation, but not when I use GPGshell. Alas, TB!'s own implementation only works with the first UserID, so I have to use GPGshell to sign, e.g., this message. - -- Cheers Peter The three most dangerous things are a programmer with a soldering iron, a manager who codes, and a user who gets ideas. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 Comment: My key: https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0xE10774CE Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org iD8DBQFCFj6FAzZSBuEHdM4RAsblAKC8Fry+CRtrSMms+hKuDjnWa3HDngCg1pJh ehGtDDr78FOpNGqJPCq38zI= =CdbI -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:14:40 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote: PM Hi David, PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any DC way to fix that? PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own PM implementation, but not when I use GPGshell. Alas, TB!'s own PM implementation only works with the first UserID, so I have to use PM GPGshell to sign, e.g., this message. Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to buying it if I had to. -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:14:40 +0100GMT (18-2-2005, 20:14 +0100, where I live), Peter Meyns wrote: PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any DC way to fix that? PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own PM implementation, but not when I use GPGshell. Alas, TB!'s own PM implementation only works with the first UserID, so I have to use PM GPGshell to sign, e.g., this message. I am using gnupg 1.4.1rc2 and I can use other UID's than the first on my keyring to sign messages without using gpgshell. - -- Henk __ The Bat! Natural Email System v3.0.1.33nl Professional on Windows XP SP2 PGPkey available at http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x12069B93DBE6E678 Gossamer Spider Web of Trust GSWoT http://www.gswot.org/ A Progressive and Innovative Web of Trust -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1rc2 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.956 iD8DBQFCFkcQEgabk9vm5ngRAufqAJ9KWfitmlscF2moIyGJzJM/TifoxwCfc4kL 8Y2/CSqKvhSki0+RdHSvWG8= =F66U -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
Hi David, on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:31:58 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any DC way to fix that? PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own PM implementation, but not when I use GPGshell. Alas, TB!'s own PM implementation only works with the first UserID, so I have to use PM GPGshell to sign, e.g., this message. DC Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to DC buying it if I had to. I don't know about v 8.x. I only have the 6.5.8ckt version for PGPDisk. I can use it for signing anyway, so I'll try. Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. -- Cheers Peter 24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? pgp4KsRYtcRsx.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else, on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Dilbert's Words of Wisdom: Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, Where the heck is the ceiling?! Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject) Re:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 20:50:31 +0100, Henk de Bruijn wrote: HdB live), Peter Meyns wrote: PM on Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:20 -0500GMT, you wrote: DC I've got a little problem... Using TB! along with GnuPG, it messes DC up my sig delimter so that it's only -- instead of --space. Any DC way to fix that? PM Not that I know of. TB! recognizes sig delimiters defected by its own PM implementation, but not when I use GPGshell. Alas, TB!'s own PM implementation only works with the first UserID, so I have to use PM GPGshell to sign, e.g., this message. HdB I am using gnupg 1.4.1rc2 and I can use other UID's than the first on HdB my keyring to sign messages without using gpgshell. I'm not seeing that problem in 1.4.0a either, just the sig delimiter thing. How'd you get around the UTF-8 to CP0 problem on stock unpatched gnupg 1.4.x though? I had to use the patched on to get that to work. -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:02:16 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:47 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: Let's see how it behaves regarding the sig delimiter. ASK Much better if you ask me, because its PGP/MIME instead of inline signing, ASK and the sig delimiter is also totally normal. :-) I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different anyway? -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
Hi David Calvarese, On 18/02/2005 03:11 PM, you wrote: I suppose I'll have to up and buy it then. I was hoping to avoid having to do that.Ummm... What exactly does it do different anyway? TB! can generate PGP/MIME signatures using GnuPG. You don't need to get PGP v8 for that. Additionally, if you wish to inline sign with GnuPG and avoid the stripping of trailing spaces, then use GPGShell to sign. -- _ _ _ __ _| | (_) ___ /\/\ / _` | | | |/ _ \/\ | (_| | | | | __/ / /\/\ \ \__,_|_|_|_|\___|___\/\/ |_| A little inaccuracy sometimes saves tons of explanation. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
Hello David Calvarese everyone else, on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to buying it if I had to. Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not: http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The making of a great original discovery is not unlike the writing of a great poem or the painting of a great picture. The thought and it's execution must be hammered out by genius alone. -- Theodore Richards, First American Nobel Laureate in Chemistry Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject) Re: TB GnuPG
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 at 21:54:32 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK on 18-Feb-2005 at 20:31 you (David Calvarese) wrote: Hrm... Would PGP V8 be any better for that? I wouldn't object to buying it if I had to. ASK Buy? Do you need to use it commercially? If not: ASK http://www.pgp.com/downloads/freeware/index.html Hey, that's handy! My only real issue with buying it is that I need to use it on 2 PCs. my work PC (for personal email) and my home PC (for the same). But I'm only ever going to be signing on one at a time. -- Best regards, David Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Changing Subject header (again)
Hello Quin, Thursday, December 23, 2004, 11:06:38 AM, you wrote: Hello TBUDL, I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject header somehow, and import back into TB! somehow. I've tried various possibilities but none of them work. I'm hoping someone will give me step by step instructions. Also, what's the address of the TB! archives, Gmail and the other one? Thanks to all who responded. With your help, I've got it working now. -- Best regards, Quin Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Changing Subject header (again)
Hello TBUDL, I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject header somehow, and import back into TB! somehow. I've tried various possibilities but none of them work. I'm hoping someone will give me step by step instructions. Also, what's the address of the TB! archives, Gmail and the other one? Thanks. -- Best regards, Quin Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Changing Subject header (again)
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:06:38 -0700, Quin Selman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject
header somehow, and import back into TB!
somehow.
That's exactly what I do sometimes. I export the message into some
temporary folder, open it in Notepad {I use Edxor] edit, save and then
import it back into TB!
--
Dejan
GROWING OLDER IS MANDATORY. GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
LAUGHING AT YOURSELF IS THERAPEUTIC!
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Changing Subject header (again)
Hello Quin, Thursday, December 23, 2004, 11:06:38 AM, you wrote: Q I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to Q change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I Q know I need to export messages using some format, change the Q Subject header somehow, and import back into TB! somehow. I've Q tried various possibilities but none of them work. I'm hoping Q someone will give me step by step instructions. Just in case you didn't know. Have you tried putting the message in the Outbox, opening it, edit the subject line, save it, and then move the message to your archive folder? Q Also, what's the address of the TB! archives, Gmail and the other Q one? The URL at the bottom of every message you receive from the TB lists has all those answers and many more. http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php Tagline of the day: Was today really necessary? Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Changing Subject header (again)
ON Thursday, December 23, 2004, 7:06:38 PM, you wrote: QS Hello TBUDL, QS I want to archive certain NYTimes articles but I'd really like to QS change the Subject line to make the articles easily accessible. I QS know I need to export messages using some format, change the Subject QS header somehow, and import back into TB! somehow. I've tried various QS possibilities but none of them work. I'm hoping someone will give me QS step by step instructions. QS Also, what's the address of the TB! archives, Gmail and the other QS one? Quin, It depends on how much of the original msg must be persevered but you could use redirect also know as alternate forward. It will send the msg to an other email account of yours (does not have to be a real account as long as you use local delivery) but before you press the send button you can eddit the subject (or anything else for that matter) Even better would be to use forward with a specific custom template. This way you could possible automate the subject change. I hope this helps. -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- On a recent survey, 80 percent of golfers admitted cheating. The other 20 percent lied. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading
Hello Bill, A reminder of what Bill McQuillan on TBUDL typed on: 17 December 2004 at 07:04:17 GMT +0100 BM My recommendation is to uncheck Use reply numbering in the subject line in all reply templates. %SINGLERE In address book templates. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 17/12/2004 at 08:32 UTC 2004 - AWB Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5. 1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt pgpP4QmYbuVwo.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading
Hi On Friday 17 December 2004 at 6:02:11 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote: However, just about everyone agrees that any other notations (like: Re(2):, 2Re:, Ant:, or many others) should NEVER be used since email programs cannot be expected to figure out all of the clever things that programmers like to put in. Note that an email program needs to find and ignore any such prefix in order to search and sort Subjects or to create its own reply Subjects. I find reply numbering useful /as long as I happen to be corresponding with somebody whose email client does it in the same way/. ;-) And Re[5]: Subject is *so* much more elegant than Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subject, or even Re: Re[2]: ... -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading
Hello TB Lists, Just thought I'd let those of you who use counters in your subject with a reply (i.e. Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0) that it messes up the threading in my newsreader (i.e. Agent 1.93) when I pull from Gmane. Not that you really care about my newsreader because I do NOT. I figure you may care about the others who do use a newsreader to read TB lists. I figure if it messes up Agent, then it is most likely to mess up other threading with other non-Agent Newsreaders except for of course those who use TB. If you do not care and like to play games on those using newsreaders, then leave it like it is. With the volume down like it is on TB lists, it may not much matter. :-) -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Gmane / subject on replies with counter / threading
On Thu, 2004-12-16, Greg Strong wrote: Hello TB Lists, Just thought I'd let those of you who use counters in your subject with a reply (i.e. Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0) that it messes up the threading in my newsreader (i.e. Agent 1.93) when I pull from Gmane. Not that you really care about my newsreader because I do NOT. I figure you may care about the others who do use a newsreader to read TB lists. I figure if it messes up Agent, then it is most likely to mess up other threading with other non-Agent Newsreaders except for of course those who use TB. If you do not care and like to play games on those using newsreaders, then leave it like it is. With the volume down like it is on TB lists, it may not much matter. :-) It should interest the users and developers of TB that the use of the simple Re: at the beginning of the Subject of a reply is controversial within the Internet Engineering Task Force which develops protocols like email. Some think that is was a mistake in the first place and some think that it is alright and should be handled by email programs. However, just about everyone agrees that any other notations (like: Re(2):, 2Re:, Ant:, or many others) should NEVER be used since email programs cannot be expected to figure out all of the clever things that programmers like to put in. Note that an email program needs to find and ignore any such prefix in order to search and sort Subjects or to create its own reply Subjects. My recommendation is to uncheck Use reply numbering in the subject line in all reply templates. -- Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
Hello, -- Regards, Ralph The Bat! 3.0.1.33 Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
Hello Ralph, Tuesday, November 16, 2004, 10:19:08 AM, you wrote: Hello, Hi there :) Sean -- Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431 Having only one spouse is called monotony. pgp2WSTm8FgwE.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
FullFolderName macro (was: Edit Message Subject)
Hello Bill, On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:36:29 -0600 GMT (09/11/2004, 01:36 +0700 GMT), Bill McCarthy wrote: BM Please Ritlabs, give us a FullFolderName macro!!! If you put this into the wishlist, I'll second it (if you post the full URL of that wishlist entry). Nothing to do with editing message subjects, but I would like it for my print template. -- Cheers, Thomas. When your mom is mad at your dad, don't let her brush your hair. - Taylia, age 11 Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: FullFolderName macro (was: Edit Message Subject)
Hello Peter, On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:11:52 +0100 GMT (11/11/2004, 03:11 +0700 GMT), Peter Ouwehand wrote: BM Please Ritlabs, give us a FullFolderName macro!!! TF If you put this into the wishlist, I'll second it (if you post the TF full URL of that wishlist entry). Nothing to do with editing message TF subjects, but I would like it for my print template. PO Here's a somewhat older request for it: PO https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2985 Exactly what I need, thanks. I added a bugnote. -- Cheers, Thomas. Unsere Autos prallten genau in dem Augenblick zusammen, als sie sich begegneten. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Edit Message Subject
Dear All, Can I edit the Subject of a message I have received? I get voicemail attachments and I want to change the subject to make it easier to identify messages. Thanks -- PJ Using TB! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit Message Subject
Monday, November 8, 2004, 9:22:56 AM, (Internet Time - @682) you wrote: Hello Paul, PJ Dear All, PJ Can I edit the Subject of a message I have received? PJ I get voicemail attachments and I want to change the subject to make PJ it easier to identify messages. PJ Thanks I believe that the easiest and fastest way to do this is, drop the message in the OUTBOX, edit the Subject line, and then move it back to the inbox. From there you can process the message as you want. I found this out on this list. Very handy way to do it. Don't think there is another way. Hope this helps... -- Best regards, Michael :texasflag: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Daily Bible Verses at http://freeop.blogspot.com/ Registered Linux User #367776 We're on a collision course with a meteor.. shake the camera! Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit Message Subject
On Mon 31-Dec-79 6:00pm -0600, Michael Acklin wrote: I found this out on this list. Very handy way to do it. Don't think there is another way. Moving the message to the Outbox and then moving it back are a rather clumsy approach. It nicer, IMHO, to simply press a hotkey, edit your message in your favorite editor, and save/close. The only obstacle, is TB!'s lack of a macro for the full folder name. If you edit List\The Bat, the FolderName macro only returns The Bat. If you import to TB! with that folder name, you message ends up in the Inbox. So you still have to move it - but only once. Please Ritlabs, give us a FullFolderName macro!!! -- Best regards, Bill Beta 3.0.2.6 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 X-Ray 1.0.1.2 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Edit Message Subject
On Mon 8-Nov-04 1:19pm -0600, Paul Jansen wrote:
Moving the message to the Outbox and then moving it
back are a rather clumsy approach. It nicer, IMHO, to
simply press a hotkey, edit your message in your
favorite editor, and save/close.
The only obstacle, is TB!'s lack of a macro for the
full folder name. If you edit List\The Bat, the
FolderName macro only returns The Bat. If you import
to TB! with that folder name, you message ends up in
the Inbox. So you still have to move it - but only
once.
Can you expand on how you do this with a hotkey?
With a hotkey triggered filter and a simple batch file.
Here's a filter:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [1F9E637A.01C49379.16A9F46F.36DB8630]
Name: Revise\20Message
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`21\0D\0A}
ExportMessage Kludges OverwriteExist FmtUnix filename C:\5Cpad\5Ctemp\5Cedit.txt
RunExternal RunHidden CmdLine c:\5Cutil\5Crevmsg.cmd folder
\5C\5CBill\5CLists\5Cc.l.f
Delete
IsActive
IsHotkey
IsHotkeyOnly
endFilter
And here's the batch file:
REM The following line starts my editor:
%vv%\gvim.exe c:\pad\temp\edit.txt
REM Now TB! puts it in the Inbox:
c:\progra~1\thebat~1\thebat.exe /importf=Inbox;X;IN=c:\pad\temp\edit.txt
--
Best regards,
Bill
Beta 3.0.2.6 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 X-Ray 1.0.1.2 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Automatically changing the subject
Hallo vleermuisjes, I'm on a mailing list that adds the list name before the subject like this: [List name] This is a subject Is it possible to automatically strip out [List name] when I receive e-mail? -- Best regards, Tony Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
Hello Tony everyone else 08-Nov-2004 04:20, you wrote: Is it possible to automatically strip out [List name] when I receive e-mail? While receiving - not with TheBat alone. You need an external program for that. Maybe www.xrayapp.com will work for you. You can alter the subject when replying. There is a subject cleaning Quick Template in the macro collection. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using TB! v3.0.2.5 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 It does not matter if you fall down, as long as you pick something up from the floor when you get up. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
On Sun 7-Nov-04 12:30pm -0400, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: 08-Nov-2004 04:20, you wrote: Is it possible to automatically strip out [List name] when I receive e-mail? While receiving - not with TheBat alone. You need an external program for that. Maybe www.xrayapp.com will work for you. This has been a TB! feature request for years. While using xray is good advice, the job can be done without it. Basically, you export the message, delete it, manipulate the exported message and import it back to TB! Missing from TB! is a FullFolderName macro. FolderName does not give enough information for importing to non-root folders. If one's TB! folders are uniquely named, it's possible to write a mapping so importing to the proper folder is possible. -- Best regards, Bill Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 7 Nov 2004, @ @ at 12:51:20 -0600, when Bill McCarthy wrote: On Sun 7-Nov-04 12:30pm -0400, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: 08-Nov-2004 04:20, you wrote: Is it possible to automatically strip out [List name] when I receive e-mail? While receiving - not with TheBat alone. You need an external program for that. Maybe www.xrayapp.com will work for you. This has been a TB! feature request for years. Yes. And then, one of users was too impatient and made XRay. God(dess) bless him. While using xray is good advice, the job can be done without it. Basically, you export the message, delete it, manipulate the exported message and import it back to TB! Missing from TB! is a FullFolderName macro. FolderName does not give enough information for importing to non-root folders. If one's TB! folders are uniquely named, it's possible to write a mapping so importing to the proper folder is possible. Fast, easy and simple. A fine laced, baroque idea. But I don't know is it good to call it automatically. If I am wrong, and had left a trails of my lousy mental work after me, my apologize in advance. - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast :flagmica: [Earth LOG: 67 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes Libranet (Linux) 2.8.1, via Cross Over Office -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFBjnky9q62QPd3XuIRAly8AJ9cfTO92qutRUnfjgY4uENelIEclACeL1py L5PN+70dC95a4wsapYkv7ms= =DpiO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
On Sun 7-Nov-04 1:36pm -0400, Mica Mijatovic wrote: But I don't know is it good to call it automatically Why? There is no manual intervention involved. An incoming filter calls for deletion, exporting and invoking the batch file or program to import. How much more automatic can you get? -- Best regards, Bill Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 7 Nov 2004, @ @ at 15:20:23 -0600, when Bill McCarthy wrote: On Sun 7-Nov-04 1:36pm -0400, Mica Mijatovic wrote: But I don't know is it good to call it automatically Why? There is no manual intervention involved. An incoming filter calls for deletion, exporting and invoking the batch file or program to import. How much more automatic can you get? I don't know... It's somehow too... overloaded to me. You see, you have lots of steps in the formula, while XRay solves it just in one step. You just add a string $CutStr($Subject, [group-name]), and that's all. It is more automatic, I recon, since it has less steps, and you have not to deal with messages after they are received (exporting-editing-importing...). - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast :happypiglet: [Earth LOG: 68 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes Libranet (Linux) 2.8.1, via Cross Over Office -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFBjrmc9q62QPd3XuIRAjSgAJ9EOeDG8l3FKWRkxtWnzlW45XMr8ACfa1cv 1ly8NNU8Xvnc6a1+QNP+Zts= =EhMc -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
On Sunday, November 07, 2004 at 7:11:08 PM [GMT -0500], Mica wrote: Why? There is no manual intervention involved. An incoming filter calls for deletion, exporting and invoking the batch file or program to import. How much more automatic can you get? I don't know... It's somehow too... overloaded to me. You see, you have lots of steps in the formula, while XRay solves it just in one step. You just add a string $CutStr($Subject, [group-name]), and that's all. It is more automatic, I recon, since it has less steps, and you have not to deal with messages after they are received (exporting-editing-importing...). There's also the issue of performance. I've used filters as described here and they're not that efficient. I used them to deal with the occasional one or so message that may come in. However, I've wondered what the performance would be like with messages from a busy list. I agree that X-Ray seems to be the better option. For us IMAP users, it's not so simple. Thankfully, I can do this server side upon receipt of messages. -- -= Allie =- . 1200 bps used to seem so fast __ Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5 for IMAP mail IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
On Sun 7-Nov-04 1:36pm -0600, Mica Mijatovic wrote: Yes. And then, one of users was too impatient and made XRay I still have my xray files. They appear to be configured correctly - they worked fine on another computer. In Xray in-mail is configured for port 110, local port 1. In TB!, I tried just changing the port to 1 - no mail. I also tried changing the server to local - still no mail. What else needs to be done in TB! ? -- Best regards, Bill Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Automatically changing the subject
On Sun 7-Nov-04 7:27pm -0600, Bill McCarthy wrote: I also tried changing the server to local - still no mail. That should be 'localhost' - that works just fine :-) -- Best regards, Bill Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro BayesIt! 0.7.3 XMP 0.9.6 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Editing subject in stored email
POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended. I find the email is not spam and teach POPFile acordingly but then I want to store that email in the correct folder. If I re-filter the folder for other reasons then the [spam] email gets refiltered to the Spam folder. So... I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the [spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!). If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r seem to be able to achieve the effect desired. Any easy ways? Any thoughts? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
Hæ! Monday, October 18, 2004, 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended. Why not disable this option in Popfile and filter instead on X-Text-Classification: spam in the header? You can edit the option in Popfile in the buckets area. -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.1 PopFile v0.22.0 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) +---+ | Get Firefox - Take back the web! | | http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliatesamp;id=22411amp;t=1 | +---+ Listening to: Tea Party - The Grand Bazaar Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Editing subject in stored email
Hæ! Monday, October 18, 2004, 14:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended. Why not disable this option in Popfile and filter instead on X-Text-Classification: spam in the header? Yes I thought of that but the problem of later re-filtering remains doesn't it? Whatever the 'mark' and whatever the filter condition still needs to be altered to prevent later filtering back into the spam folder. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 18 Oct 2004, @ @ at 13:31:20 +0100, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended. I find the email is not spam and teach POPFile acordingly but then I want to store that email in the correct folder. If I re-filter the folder for other reasons then the [spam] email gets refiltered to the Spam folder. So... I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the [spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!). If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r seem to be able to achieve the effect desired. Any easy ways? Any thoughts? No (very) easy ways, as I know. You can edit headers, including the subject field, only if you save a message to disk, and then edit it using some text editor - and then importing the message again in TB. But, the receiving time will not be original one any more. If you have a fine bunch of such messages then a toll for mass-search and replace might be of some help. - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast [Earth LOG: 47 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFBc8cy9q62QPd3XuIRAi07AJ4zXav4PotsFoy/rIJ5kesAZuzszACgjty5 Vw9dhBHJexbAAPAcWjaR72U= =qPzJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
On Mon 18 October 2004, 22:31:20 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the
[spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!).
If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r seem to be
able to achieve the effect desired.
Any easy ways? Any thoughts?
Here's my solution to editing a received message without changing header
date/time.
The following filter writes the message to a text file and then runs a
cmd file (D:\Batch\editmsg.cmd) that opens it in my text editor, and
when the editor is closed re-imports it into the inbox of my account
named personal. To change the account name, change the parameter at
the end of the line that starts RunExternal.
The filter is executed by CTRL-ALT-SHIFT-E.
Change to suit your paths and text editor. Note that this is as
automatically converted from a v2 filter to a v3 filter, so it might
benefit from some tuning.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [4AA35E40.01C4B193.09E630C8.30EE97ED]
Name: Edit\20Message
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`0`0`\0D\0A}
ExportMessage OverwriteExist FmtUnix filename e:\5Ctemp\5Cedit.txt
RunExternal RunHidden CmdLine d:\5Cbatch\5Ceditmsg.cmd\20personal
MoveMessage folder \5C\5C\5CTrash
IsManual
IsContinue
IsActive
IsHotkey
IsHotkeyOnly
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
,- [ D:\Batch\editmsg.cmd ]
| D:\Program Files\UltraEdit\UEDIT32.EXE e:\temp\edit.txt
| d:\progra~1\thebat~1\thebat.exe /importu=%1;f=Inbox;X;IN=e:\temp\edit.txt
`-
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
On Mon 18 October 2004, 23:37:56 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote: You can edit headers, including the subject field, only if you save a message to disk, and then edit it using some text editor - and then importing the message again in TB. But, the receiving time will not be original one any more Not if you use the UNIX format. That stores the receive date/time in the exported file, and retains it when you import it. -- Robin Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Editing subject in stored email
Hi
Monday, October 18, 2004, 2:41:05 PM, you wrote:
On Mon 18 October 2004, 22:31:20 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the
[spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!).
If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r seem to be
able to achieve the effect desired.
Any easy ways? Any thoughts?
Here's my solution to editing a received message without changing header
date/time.
The following filter writes the message to a text file and then runs a
cmd file (D:\Batch\editmsg.cmd) that opens it in my text editor, and
when the editor is closed re-imports it into the inbox of my account
named personal. To change the account name, change the parameter at
the end of the line that starts RunExternal.
The filter is executed by CTRL-ALT-SHIFT-E.
Change to suit your paths and text editor. Note that this is as
automatically converted from a v2 filter to a v3 filter, so it might
benefit from some tuning.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [4AA35E40.01C4B193.09E630C8.30EE97ED]
Name: Edit\20Message
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`0`0`\0D\0A}
ExportMessage OverwriteExist FmtUnix filename e:\5Ctemp\5Cedit.txt
RunExternal RunHidden CmdLine d:\5Cbatch\5Ceditmsg.cmd\20personal
MoveMessage folder \5C\5C\5CTrash
IsManual
IsContinue
IsActive
IsHotkey
IsHotkeyOnly
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
,- [ D:\Batch\editmsg.cmd ]
| D:\Program Files\UltraEdit\UEDIT32.EXE e:\temp\edit.txt
| d:\progra~1\thebat~1\thebat.exe /importu=%1;f=Inbox;X;IN=e:\temp\edit.txt
`-
Just drag the message to the OUTBOX and then open the mail and edit it :-)
--
Morpheus
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [the_bat] Re[2]: Editing subject in stored email
Hello TBUDL, Just drag the message to the OUTBOX and then open the mail and edit it :-) Dang, that was too easy. Thanks for this tip, it works great. I had the same problem with PopFile and was watching this thread. After reading this solution, I find it the fastest and easiest way to change the Subject line. Thanks again... -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Daily Bible Verses at http://freeop.blogspot.com/ Registered Linux User #367776 Advantages of being messy: One is constantly making new discoveries. pgpAl60ikkf1W.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Mon, 18 Oct 2004, @ @ at 23:45:11 +1000, when Robin Anson wrote: On Mon 18 October 2004, 23:37:56 +1000, Mica Mijatovic wrote: You can edit headers, including the subject field, only if you save a message to disk, and then edit it using some text editor - and then importing the message again in TB. But, the receiving time will not be original one any more Not if you use the UNIX format. That stores the receive date/time in the exported file, and retains it when you import it. Ah, beautiful! Thanks. (: - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast [Earth LOG: 47 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFBc9589q62QPd3XuIRAqQHAJ9ppJlpTz1jr6BWhCEWhIac7x2z0ACgm55j ARsJnO0PB7/PK9rnuRe32xA= =v9Zz -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
Hello admin, old message... aacu POPFile amedns the subject with a word such as [spam] prepended. aacu I find the email is not spam and teach POPFile acordingly but then I aacu want to store that email in the correct folder. aacu If I re-filter the folder for other reasons then the [spam] email gets aacu refiltered to the Spam folder. aacu So... aacu I need to be able to edit the subject of the email to remove the aacu [spam] prependation (ohh I like that word!). aacu If I go to the mailbox and open it in a text editor I don'r seem to be aacu able to achieve the effect desired. aacu Any easy ways? Any thoughts? My reply... PopFile has the ability to use headers only. Use headers only and there is no visible spam declaration. -- pgpg8QK4BuLpe.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Editing subject in stored email
On Mon 18 October 2004, 23:47:17 +1000, Tbudl wrote: Just drag the message to the OUTBOX and then open the mail and edit it :-) Changes the date and time on it - no good if those are important. -- Robin Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need help please: why ? in subject line in viewer window?
could any one tell me how to unsubscribe please? BW Hello experts, BW I am trying The Bat! Home Edition 3.0. Now I found a BW problem. Some BW e-mails are in Chinese. BW In earlier versions, the subject line could show BW Chinese characters in BW viewer window as well as in message list window BW although in RFC-822 BW headers such characters as =?gb2312?B?x+8gwOs=?= BW showed up. BW In this new version, in some accounts, Chinese still BW can be shown. BW However, in other accounts, Chinese characters could BW not be shown BW correctly in the subject line in the viewer window BW although they are BW shown in RFC-822 headers and in the message list BW window. This not only BW happens in subject line, but in from and to line. All BW Chinese were BW replaced with ?. Strangely, when I save the message, BW Chinese subject BW can show up. But those ? are very annoying. BW I do not know if appropriate to send the attachment to BW the list. I BW have two screenshots. But I did not send. BW Could anyone tell me how to solve this problem? Thanks BW in advance. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need help please: why ? in subject line in viewer window?
Hallo Bin, On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:10:17 -0700 (PDT)GMT (28-9-2004, 20:10 +0200, where I live), you wrote: H8 could any one tell me how to unsubscribe please? http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbudl -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0.0.19 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. pgpoGGsEcEU4D.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: need help please: why ? in subject line in viewer window?
thank you, MAU, Roelof Otten, __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: need help please: why ? in subject line in viewer window?
Hallo Bin, On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:36:06 -0700 (PDT)GMT (29-9-2004, 0:36 +0200, where I live), you wrote: H8 thank you, MAU, Roelof Otten, I don't know why, since you still didn't cancel your subscription. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0.0.19 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mod: Cut mark (was: need help please: why ? in subject line in viewer window?)
Hallo Bin, On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:36:06 -0700 (PDT)GMT (29-9-2004, 0:36 +0200, where I live), you wrote: H8 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: H8 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Bin. ' Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without the signature and list footers since everything below and including the sig delimiter is excluded when quoting. You can easily automate this process by including the sig delimiter in your templates. Even if you barely have a signature to speak of, that doesn't make any difference to whether or not you need a cut mark. You are being courteous to other readers since at least three lines of text is added to your signature by the list server. To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you subscribed. Thank you. /moderator -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0.0.19 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 1 pop3 account, server on LAN Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. pgp2WedbS0Ihy.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
need help please: why ? in subject line in viewer window?
Hello experts, I am trying The Bat! Home Edition 3.0. Now I found a problem. Some e-mails are in Chinese. In earlier versions, the subject line could show Chinese characters in viewer window as well as in message list window although in RFC-822 headers such characters as =?gb2312?B?x+8gwOs=?= showed up. In this new version, in some accounts, Chinese still can be shown. However, in other accounts, Chinese characters could not be shown correctly in the subject line in the viewer window although they are shown in RFC-822 headers and in the message list window. This not only happens in subject line, but in from and to line. All Chinese were replaced with ?. Strangely, when I save the message, Chinese subject can show up. But those ? are very annoying. I do not know if appropriate to send the attachment to the list. I have two screenshots. But I did not send. Could anyone tell me how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance. -- Best regards, cornelll mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows name: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Windows version(major.minor): 5.0 Service pack: Service Pack 4 Windows build: 2195 Windows Codename: Neptune The Bat! Home Edition: 3.0 __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
help: why ? in subject line in viewer window?
Hello experts, I am trying The Bat! Home Edition 3.0. Now I found a problem. Some e-mails are in Chinese. In earlier versions, the subject line could show Chinese characters in viewer window as well as in message list window although in RFC-822 headers such characters as =?gb2312?B?x+8gwOs=?= showed up. In this new version, in some accounts, Chinese still can be shown. However, in other accounts, Chinese characters could not be shown correctly in the subject line in the viewer window although they are shown in RFC-822 headers and in the message list window. This not only happens in subject line, but in from and to line. All Chinese were replaced with ?. Strangely, when I save the message, Chinese subject can show up. But those ? are very annoying. I do not know if appropriate to send the attachment to the list. I have two screenshots. But I did not send. Could anyone tell me how to solve this problem? Thanks in advance. -- Best regards, cornelll mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows name: Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Windows version(major.minor): 5.0 Service pack: Service Pack 4 Windows build: 2195 Windows Codename: Neptune The Bat! Home Edition: 3.0 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
Hello TBUDL, I want to unsubscribe from here, how can I do this? -- Best regards, Elena Using The Bat! 3.0.0.15 on Windows XP 5 Build 2600 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: (no subject)
Hello Zeynel, Monday, September 20, 2004, 5:31:18 PM, you wrote: ZAO Hello Elena, ZAO Monday, September 20, 2004, 4:22:15 PM, you wrote: EM I want to unsubscribe from here, how can I do this? ZAO While this message open (or any TBUDL message), go specials menu | ZAO mailing list | unsubscribe. Send the message. Thank you! I have never known such a feature. This is my last email here, thanks, take care to anybody here, and good luck! -- Best regards, Elena Using The Bat! 3.0.0.15 on Windows XP 5 Build 2600 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in version 3? Doug Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote... I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in version 3? The NFS is no longer optional as it was in the beta during testing. It IS the filter system. Go to Account, Sorting Office/Filter, and you'll see what is the new filtering system. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP Service Pack 2 War is God's way of teaching us geography. pgpUwjNPCLuQJ.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
Hello Doug, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DW How do I get NFS in version 3? The filters are NFS. You now have no option and so far they seem to be working better than in version 2 or maybe I'm lucky. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 1 pgp9xkbhNHgny.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
Hello Doug, I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in version 3? Just open the Sorting Office. NFS is the only option in v3.0. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
How do I get NFS in version 3? NFS? What's that? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.0 with POPFile 0.21.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, Doug Weller wrote... I tried out the 3 beta and saw the tick box in Account properties, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't there always, and it isn't in my 3 final. Now you see it now you don't? How do I get NFS in version 3? The NFS is no longer optional as it was in the beta during testing. It IS the filter system. Go to Account, Sorting Office/Filter, and you'll see what is the new filtering system. Thanks, I'm ok now! Doug Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
hi all, have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location using thebat v2.12, the images are not visible there though same rogue.zip is properly installed.. what could be the probable reasons ? with best regards -- pk roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- :[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TB v2.12.0 / W2K SP4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
Hi pk, On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr using thebat v2.12, Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending it from? -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 On a clear disk you can seek forever. pgpifmk6TWOGV.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: (no subject)
Hello Darrin, receiving is v2.12.0 Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 8:41:30 PM, you wrote: Hi pk, On 8/3/2004 7:59 AM my time, pk wrote: pr have been sending cc to one of my other accounts in other location pr using thebat v2.12, Is the receiving e-mail program V2.12 or just the one your sending it from? pk roy --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] using TB! v2.12.0 W2K SP4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
(no subject)
Hi I can't seem to get IMAP emails to be deleted off the IMAP server. Is there an account feature I have missed that lets me do this?? THanks mike -- Mike Smith Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: (no subject)
Hello Mike, Thursday, July 29, 2004, 10:02:41 AM, you wrote: I can't seem to get IMAP emails to be deleted off the IMAP server. Is there an account feature I have missed that lets me do this?? Try: Folder / Purge+Compress -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mod: Inadequate subject (was: Virtual Folders)
Hi Allie, on Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:25:30 -0500GMT, you wrote: AM moderator AM ... AM The subject you used to start this thread is inadequate. It doesn't AM contain enough to adequately reflect what the message is about. AM Some areas are just too broad to make the subject adequate by simply AM stating the part or feature that you're discussing. AM Virtual Folders: How do I use them? AM Would have been better. It would save those who don't wish to take AM part in a how to thread the trouble of reading that thread once it AM develops. You are certainly right. But how would a /newbie/ know, that there are so many issues about VFs that have been and will be discussed? ;-) -- Cheers Peter Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on. Winston Churchill Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mod: Inadequate subject (was: Virtual Folders)
Peter Meyns, [PM] wrote: You are certainly right. But how would a /newbie/ know, that there are so many issues about VFs that have been and will be discussed? ;-) The first time I moderated a message subject on TBUDL, it was poor Maggie who was the gulp victim /gulp. She felt like one too and we had to clear up that problem off-list. I wrote to Darrin about this and it turns out that he didn't mind, and agreed that my interjection was reasonably placed. So it's OK. It will take a while but I suspect I'll soon not have to moderate subjects a lot. In fact there has been a marked improvement already. I'm impressed. :D -- -=[ Allie Martin ]=- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com The Bat! v2.12.04 on WinXP Pro (SP1) pgp4naqGLJrTr.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Spell-check the subject
==Original message text=== From: rich gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, July 17, 2004, 2:00:39 AM Subject: Spell-check the subject rg Hello Bat-Folk! rg Is there a way to tell the spell checker to look at the subject line? rg Thx rg Rich G ===End of original message text=== Really good remark. I use mail clients for years, as OE5, Office Outlook, and others, but never I've seen a spell checker for subject line. This feature is indispensable because you are dead if your mail start with a mistake just on the first line ! Maybe TB will be the first to do that. -- WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED] TB 2.12.00 Windows XP Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Spell-check the subject
Hello WilWilWil, On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 13:33:54 +0200 UTC, WilWilWil wrote: W Really good remark. I use mail clients for years, as OE5, Office W Outlook, and others, but never I've seen a spell checker for subject W line. Use Mac OS X. The speller is part of the system so it's available anywhere (even in HTML forms). Isn't there a system-level spell checker available for Windows. -- Regards, Charles. TB! 2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 / Courier IMAP 3.0.5 pgpXWNpZjCDYu.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Spell-check the subject
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Charles posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to Spell-check the subject : CMG snip Isn't there a system-level spell checker available for CMG Windows. /snip yes. tinyspell freeware -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V2.12.00/W2K_SP4 ICQ 41116329 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Spell-check the subject
Hi WilWilWil - On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, at 13:33:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 4:33 AM where I live) you wrote: Really good remark. I use mail clients for years, as OE5, Office Outlook, and others, but never I've seen a spell checker for subject line. This feature is indispensable because you are dead if your mail start with a mistake just on the first line ! Maybe TB will be the first to do that. Outlook does spell check the subject line. I think Eudora does as well. TB certainly should but obviously doesn't. -- Best Regards, Kevin Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgpTaiZfYy1EO.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Spell-check the subject
Dear list, jrsn On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Charles posted to jrsn [EMAIL PROTECTED] in jrsn regards to Spell-check the subject : CMG snip Isn't there a system-level spell checker available for CMG Windows. /snip jrsn yes. tinyspell freeware Well, that's fine when you are just using the keyboard to write stuff; but it treats all key presses as words so, for example, repeated - which I do when moving to the next unread message - generates an error. -- Eric Using TB! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: subject hijacking
On Thursday, July 15, 2004, 8:48 PM, you wrote: RG OT: I may like the term hijacking, but I LOVE the phrase 'trout RG not accepted'! I needed that one earlier this week!! A ;) M :gdr: duck cover yow! and that is :grin: :ohboy: :running: -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0429-2 (16.07.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: subject hijacking
Hello Allie, Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 5:01:48 PM, you wrote: A Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: RG OT: I may like the term hijacking, but I LOVE the phrase 'trout RG not accepted'! A ;) :gdr: duck cover yow! -- Maggie Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
