Re: Known bug?
Hello Akebono, On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:50:03 +0100 GMT (11/Feb/11, 16:50 PM +0700 GMT), Akebono Translation Service wrote: ATS It seems The Bat converts the combination of ym to µ in IE's web ATS address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML ATS e-mail (if the format is plain text, this does not happen). ATS For example: ATS www.url.com/name=heymaster=1 ATS becomes ATS www.url.com/name=heµaster=1 ATS in IE Not confirmed. I clicked on the first link, and the URL (at least in the address bar in IE) shows the same. No conversion to the second URL. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.36.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 you wrote: TF Hello Akebono, TF On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:50:03 +0100 GMT (11/Feb/11, 16:50 PM +0700 GMT), TF Akebono Translation Service wrote: ATS It seems The Bat converts the combination of ym to µ in IE's web ATS address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML ATS e-mail (if the format is plain text, this does not happen). ATS For example: ATS www.url.com/name=heymaster=1 ATS becomes ATS www.url.com/name=heµaster=1 ATS in IE TF Not confirmed. I clicked on the first link, and the URL (at least in TF the address bar in IE) shows the same. No conversion to the second TF URL. My result is exactly the same as Thomas's. Clicking on the top link launches Firefox and copies the link into Firefox's address bar exactly as shown. No conversion to the lower link and curiously, both links take me to the same page (URL.COM) even though they both appear in Firefox's address bar exactly as shown here. -- Jack LaRosa Using The Bat! ver: 4.2.42. Running Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Known bug?
Dear all, It seems The Bat converts the combination of ym to µ in IE's web address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML e-mail (if the format is plain text, this does not happen). For example: www.url.com/name=heymaster=1 becomes www.url.com/name=heµaster=1 in IE Is this a known bug? It seems pretty serious to me! Best regards, Loek van Kooten = Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays, address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and contains important information only -- no spam, advertisements, or promotions: http://www.akebono.nl/lists/?p=subscribeid=1 -- Akebono Translation Service Rijnstraat 32 2311 NK Leiden The Netherlands Tel: +31-87-8763636 Fax: +31-84-7390618 www.akebono.nl Algemene voorwaarden: www.akebono.nl/algemeen.doc Terms and conditions: www.akebono.nl/terms.doc Chamber of Commerce reg. no.: 28066372 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
Dear all, It seems The Bat converts the combination of ym to µ in IE's web address bar if this combination is found within a link in an HTML e-mail (if the format is plain text, this does not happen). P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says ym, not µ Best regards, Loek van Kooten = Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays, address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and contains important information only -- no spam, advertisements, or promotions: http://www.akebono.nl/lists/?p=subscribeid=1 -- Akebono Translation Service Rijnstraat 32 2311 NK Leiden The Netherlands Tel: +31-87-8763636 Fax: +31-84-7390618 www.akebono.nl Algemene voorwaarden: www.akebono.nl/algemeen.doc Terms and conditions: www.akebono.nl/terms.doc Chamber of Commerce reg. no.: 28066372 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 10:56:56, Akebono Translation Service wrote: P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says ym, not µ If the source says something like a href=http://www.example.com/foo?bar=ym=baz; that's illegal HTML, and the result is not surprising. All characters in HTML must be written as amp;. If a bare appears in source, different HTML parsers will do different things - some will remove and all alphanumeric characters following it, others will just remove the , some will leave as-is and some will try to interpret the entity even though it's missing the finishing ; (which is what seems to be happening in your case). None of these behaviours should be relied on. -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ Science is Truth. Don't be misled by fact. -- Finagle's Creed Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
Dear Jernej, All characters in HTML must be written as amp;. That explains a lot and solved my issue. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Loek van Kooten = Please subscribe to our newsletter for updates about our agency (holidays, address changes, etc.). It is sent once or twice a year and contains important information only -- no spam, advertisements, or promotions: http://www.akebono.nl/lists/?p=subscribeid=1 -- Akebono Translation Service Rijnstraat 32 2311 NK Leiden The Netherlands Tel: +31-87-8763636 Fax: +31-84-7390618 www.akebono.nl Algemene voorwaarden: www.akebono.nl/algemeen.doc Terms and conditions: www.akebono.nl/terms.doc Chamber of Commerce reg. no.: 28066372 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
- Original Message From: Jernej Simončič jernej.listso...@ena.si If the source says something like a href=http://www.example.com/foo?bar=ym=baz; that's illegal HTML, and the result is not surprising. All characters in HTML must be written as amp;. If a bare appears in source, different HTML parsers will do different things - some will remove and all alphanumeric characters following it, others will just remove the , some will leave as-is and some will try to interpret the entity even though it's missing the finishing ; (which is what seems to be happening in your case). None of these behaviours should be relied on. That's accurate except in this case. The reason the character shouldn't be used in HTML is because it's a key element in the parsing of URLs (the character separates parameters in the URL). So in this case, where the character is actually in a URL, that is a perfectly appropriate usage of the character as it is separating the key value pairs bar=y and m=baz. Loek, this could be a more complicated issue. I'm not clear on whether this is an issue with TB! or with IE (I'd be much more inclined to believe it's IE). You say it works in plain text, but fails in HTML, but only if the destination browser is IE? If you copy the URL from the HTML email and paste it into the location bar of different browsers (Firefox, Chrome, IE) what happens? My initial thought is that it has something to do with the encoding and possibly the settings in your OS. Some rigorous testing would need to be done to narrow down where exactly the issue is occurring. -Sam -- Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 15:58:53, Sam Brown wrote: That's accurate except in this case. The reason the character shouldn't be used in HTML is because it's a key element in the parsing of URLs (the character separates parameters in the URL). So in this case, where the character is actually in a URL, that is a perfectly appropriate usage of the character as it is separating the key value pairs bar=y and m=baz. No, should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception. The HTML parser sees fooamp;bar=baz and knows that the URL has to be foobar=baz. on it's own is illegal in HTML, however since way too many people incorrectly assume that they can use without escaping it, most browsers will treat without ; following it as if amp; was written. You can see that here: http://eternallybored.org/misc/thebat/test.html - first URL uses amp; properly, second one doesn't. -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Kensington's Observation Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
Hello Jernej On Friday, February 11, 2011, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote: No, should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception. But Google search uses for example: http://www.google.com/search?q=ampersandhl=ennum=10lr=lang_enft=icr=safe=imagestbs=lr%3Alang_1en -- Jeff Gaines Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
On 2/11/11 12:42 PM, Jeff Gaines wrote: Hello Jernej On Friday, February 11, 2011, 4:55:16 PM, you wrote: No, should always be escaped in HTML - URLs are no exception. But Google search uses for example: http://www.google.com/search?q=ampersandhl=ennum=10lr=lang_enft=icr=safe=imagestbs=lr%3Alang_1en You aren't seeing the escapes behind the scene. While you may see that in your browser, if you look at the source you will see amp instead of the ampersand. JBB Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
Hi On Friday 11 February 2011 at 10:22:13 AM, in mid:137386865.2011022...@eternallybored.org, Jernej Simoncic wrote: On Friday, February 11, 2011, 10:56:56, Akebono Translation Service wrote: P.S. The mail is encoded in utf-8 and the source clearly says ym, not µ If the source says something like a href=http://www.example.com/foo?bar=ym=baz; that's illegal HTML, Which suggests a bug in whatever software created the HTML email message in question, rather than in TB! as the receiving mail app. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:expires2...@ymail.com Can you imagine a world with no hypothetical situations? Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known bug?
On Friday, February 11, 2011, 19:41:20, Jonathan Bayer wrote: You aren't seeing the escapes behind the scene. While you may see that in your browser, if you look at the source you will see amp instead of the ampersand. It really depends - some of Google's URLs use amp; and others use just . -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ On the TV screen, pure drivel tends to drive off ordinary drivel. -- Kitman's Law Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Inbox - Known ??
Hi : What's the story with the Inbox - Known folder? Thanks. Regards, Gary Odom g...@waterfire.us Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox - Known ??
Hello Raymund, On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:43:45 +0200 GMT (25/Sep/10, 15:43 PM +0700 GMT), Raymund Tump wrote: What's the story with the Inbox - Known folder? RT Well, there should be a Known filter in your sorting office. That RT would move all messages that are from people in your addressbook to RT the known inbox if active. the problem is that only incoming messages and not outgoing messages are caught by the Known filter, so the conversations are not in the same folder and do not thread. There is no known filter for Outgoing messages. RT Nowadays you might want to achieve the same thing with a virtual RT folder and keep all the messages in the inbox. Much better, but you still need to create seperate filters for incoming and outgoing messages. A six years old wishlist item could fix that: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3319 -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.36.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What is Inbox - Known for?
Hello Chris, Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 7:38:25 PM, you wrote: Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM What is Inbox - Known for? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for? It is for messages from contacts in your address book. There is also a pre-built filter in the Sorting Office that will move messages from these people into the Known folder. The filter is called Known. You may need to enable it. Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If Inbox - Known was just a reference to the email, and not a move or copy, I'd probably use it, though. -- Andrew Diederich Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is Inbox - Known for?
Hi Andrew, on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:58 -0600GMT (30.08.2006, 21:08 +0200GMT here), you wrote: AAD Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get AD is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If AD Inbox - Known was just a reference to the email, and not a move or AD copy, I'd probably use it, though. I'm sure you can make a Virtual Folder do that. AD Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 AD Service Pack 2 There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta. If interested, get it at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/voyager_beta14.rar -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.81.17 RC1 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE enabled Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is Inbox - Known for?
Hello Peter, On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PM There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta. You had me all excited there for a minute until I realised that it's not exactly new and it's the one I have already installed :-( -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1. POP3 account AntispamSniper plug-in | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost Firewall Pro, Spysweeper, Adaware, SpyBot Holiday in France: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/lazyhomes/holiday.html Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
What is Inbox - Known for?
Hello Batfolk, I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for? Thanks for the help. -- Andrew Diederich Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What is Inbox - Known for?
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM What is Inbox - Known for? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for? It is for messages from contacts in your address book. There is also a pre-built filter in the Sorting Office that will move messages from these people into the Known folder. The filter is called Known. You may need to enable it. -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. A .44 magnum beats four aces. pgpEDewsBE80o.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Inbox-Known
Two questions on Inbox-Known: 1. When my cursor in on Inbox-Known and I on New Message, the account that is being used is Account1234, by default. I don't recall setting the account to be used for Inbox-known. Is there a way to set the default account to another account? [I don't know whether this is a coincidence but Inbox-Known is just below Account1234 -- in the Accounts pane.] 2. In a regular account, I can instruct it to ignore the Reading Confirmation. However, some of my mail is filtered to Inbox-Known immediately upon retrieval. When those email are read in Inbox-Known, it generates a Reading Confirmation Receipt (for each email that requested a Reading confirmation); and put it in the Outbox of Account1234. How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation Request? -- Thanks in advance Using The Bat! 2.12.04 Under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-Known
Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold : z How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation z Request? I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known : Templates | Over-ride | Ignore -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky: _ The Bat! Version: 3.80.06 Windows ME FireFox Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Inbox-Known
Sunday, June 11, 2006, Robert D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold : z How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation z Request? I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known : Templates | Over-ride | Ignore I don't have over-ride under Templates. When I put my cursor on Inbox-Known, and go to Account Properties, the Common Folder Properties comes up. In that Properties box, all I get are Options, Templates, Memo and Chat. Under Templates, I only have Save Messages and Cookies. What am I missing? -- Thanks in advance Using The Bat! 2.12.04 Under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-Known
Hello, Sunday, June 11, 2006, 7:48:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I put my cursor on Inbox-Known, and go to Account Properties, the Common Folder Properties comes up. In that Properties box, all I get are Options, Templates, Memo and Chat. Under Templates, I only have Save Messages and Cookies. What am I missing? I see you are using version 2. On the latest non-beta version, it's under Templates | Confirmation in the folder's property settings. Here's a screenshot (68k): http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/613/rc16ch.jpg -- Scott Moorman Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail into inbox-known?
Hi On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 9:19:52 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote: M You may find it re-created the next time you start TB! IIRC that depends on whether the known filter is active or not. Only tried once and it came back. I expect the filter was active because I think I have never altered or deleted it. -- Best regards, MFPA Why is the universe here? Well, where else would it be? Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail into inbox-known?
Hallo Darrin, On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:01:16 -0800GMT (4-12-2005, 6:01 +0100, where I live), you wrote: D In my address book I have some listed in the default personal address D book. Others listed in different groups. I dont notice emails from any D of the people in my address book actually showing up in my inbox-known D folder. What do you suppose is wrong here? I guess your known filter could be inactive or all messages could be processed by other filters. My own inbox-known is rarely used for the latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my real filters. -- Groetjes, Roelof WinErr: 010 Reserved for future mistakes by our developers The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgp7hQp1662d9.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail into inbox-known?
Hello Roelof, Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:30:56 AM, you wrote: RO My own inbox-known is rarely used for the RO latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my RO real filters. I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I think Ill just delete it. -- Darrin Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail into inbox-known?
Hi On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 12:46:39 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Darrin wrote: I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I think Ill just delete it. You may find it re-created the next time you start TB! -- Best regards, MFPA We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail into inbox-known?
Hello MFPA, Sunday, December 4, 2005, 1:04:28 PM, you wrote: M You may find it re-created the next time you start TB! Nope. Didnt show up. -- Darrin Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mail into inbox-known?
Hallo MFPA, On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:04:28 +GMT (4-12-2005, 22:04 +0100, where I live), you wrote: I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I think Ill just delete it. M You may find it re-created the next time you start TB! IIRC that depends on whether the known filter is active or not. -- Groetjes, Roelof When you're a little rabbit, carry a big gun. The Bat! 3.63.06 (Beta) Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgppAScVzxkg3.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Mail into inbox-known?
Hello friends, In my address book I have some listed in the default personal address book. Others listed in different groups. I dont notice emails from any of the people in my address book actually showing up in my inbox-known folder. What do you suppose is wrong here? -- Darrin Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Inbox known - missing from random account
31 July 2005 - 14:58 Hello Tbudl, I stopped using TB! just over a year ago (I can't remember why) but a couple of days ago saw the error of my ways and bought and installed the latest version. It was like slipping into an old leather jacket; everything fitted perfectly! I bought Bloomba, then somebody else did; I persevered with Poco. What a waste of a year. Now, I've just gone through my ten accounts and activated the 'inbox - known' filter but on one of those accounts (the third to be stet up) it was missing. Not a great problem - I just created it, but does anyone know what might have happened to it? None of the accounts has any other filters in place. -- Best regards, William Flying with The Bat! Professional version 3.51.10 Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Deleting Known Inbox
Hi TBUDL'ers, I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. Is it Ok to delete the Known Inbox? This is a special folder so I don't want to regret this later on. -- thanks! alien .. Using The Bat! v3.5.26 on .. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.51 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Deleting Known Inbox
Hallo alien, On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:03:25 -0300GMT (13-7-2005, 17:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: A I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. That's totally up to you. A Is it Ok to delete the Known Inbox? Yes. A This is a special folder so I don't want to regret this later on. IIRC It will be created anew when you start using the known filter. -- Groetjes, Roelof Windows: Ultimate memory manager. It manages to use it all. The Bat! 3.51 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpYskBAKe9zR.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.51 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Deleting Known Inbox
Hello alien, On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:03:25 -0300 GMT (13/07/2005, 22:03 +0700 GMT), alien wrote: a I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. Is it Ok to a delete the Known Inbox? This is a special folder so I don't want to a regret this later on. It's perfectly OK. TB will recreate the folder upon next startup, AFAIK. :-( -- Cheers, Thomas. Early to rise and early to bed, makes a man healthy but socially dead. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.51 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.51 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Deleting Known Inbox
Hallo Thomas, On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:14:15 +0700GMT (13-7-2005, 18:14 +0200, where I live), you wrote: a I don't use the Known filter which is created by default. Is it Ok to a delete the Known Inbox? This is a special folder so I don't want to a regret this later on. TF It's perfectly OK. TB will recreate the folder upon next startup, TF AFAIK. :-( Not when you disable the known filter. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Babylon Project was our last, best hope for peace. It failed. The Bat! 3.51 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM pgpcvdhcd8Dlb.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.51 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Inbox-known
Hello Group On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 3:00:48 AM, Darrin wrote: Hello Thomas, Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote: The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked. I checked and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but how do I re-create the filter? Thanks The condition is: Address Book Contains Sender Action is: Move To The Folder (folder name) -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines: Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
Hello Jeff, Saturday, June 18, 2005, 1:18:07 AM, you wrote: The condition is: Address Book Contains Sender Action is: Move To The Folder (folder name) Great! Thank you much :) -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
Hello Darrin, On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:20:24 -0700 GMT (17/06/2005, 09:20 +0700 GMT), Darrin wrote: D It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is D no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one? The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked. -- Cheers, Thomas. - MAN WANTED TO WORK IN DYNAMITE FACTORY. MUST BE WILLING TO TRAVEL. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5.26 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:22:23 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked. I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. I have created a few local filters for my new IMAP account, so I just took a look at that account's sorting office, and find no 'known' filter there. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using The Bat! 3.5.27 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:50:52 AM, Dwight A Corrin wrote: I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. I have created a few local filters for my new IMAP account, so I just took a look at that account's sorting office, and find no 'known' filter there. and on further reflection, immediately after sending the send button on last message, notice there is no inbox-known created for that account. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using The Bat! 3.5.27 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
Hello Dwight A Corrin everyone else, on 17-Jun-2005 at 17:56 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote: sending the send button That button didn't arrive here yet, however... ;-) SCNR! -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Deliplayer2 is playing: Dub Angel (3:49) by Snooze vs DJ Cam from the 1996 album 'Freezone 3 - Horizontal Dancing (CD2)' Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
Hello Dwight, On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:50:52 -0500 GMT (17/06/2005, 22:50 +0700 GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP. -- Cheers, Thomas. Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It is a good chance to get rid of those things not worth keeping around the house. Bring your husbands. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.5.26 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 11:23:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: DAC I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP. I don't know either. Figured the only to learn whether that was because of the differences, or whether it was an oversight, was to ask. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using The Bat! 3.5.27 on Windows XP version 5,1 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
Hello Thomas, Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote: The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked. I checked and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but how do I re-create the filter? Thanks -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Inbox-known
Hello TBUDL, I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into inbox-known automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something I must do to get this working? -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
On Thu 16-Jun-05 8:21pm -0500, Darrin wrote: I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into inbox-known automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something I must do to get this working? What do you mean by doesn't seem to work? Are mails going into inbox-known that are from senders not in your address book? Or are mails from senders in your address book not going in? If it is the latter, run Test Filters on a mail that should have gone there. Is it going somewhere else? If nothing is being triggered, make sure there is a sender address that is really in your address book and the known filter is active. -- Best regards, Bill The Wounded Bat 3.5.27 Pro BayesIt! 0.8.1 X-Ray 1.4.0.0 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
Hello Bill, Thursday, June 16, 2005, 7:06:15 PM, you wrote: If it is the latter, run Test Filters on a mail that should have gone there. Is it going somewhere else? If nothing is being triggered, make sure there is a sender address that is really in your address book and the known filter is active. It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one? -- Best regards, Darrin Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Inbox-known
On Thu 16-Jun-05 9:20pm -0500, Darrin wrote: Thursday, June 16, 2005, 7:06:15 PM, you wrote: If it is the latter, run Test Filters on a mail that should have gone there. Is it going somewhere else? If nothing is being triggered, make sure there is a sender address that is really in your address book and the known filter is active. It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one? It one time it was created automatically. It was called known (without the quotes). You are not really missing anything important - I have mine disabled. I created my own called known with put messages not with me as a sender (I'm in the address book) AND with the sender in the address book. The actions is to move to Inbox-known and it is active. -- Best regards, Bill The Wounded Bat 3.5.27 Pro BayesIt! 0.8.1 X-Ray 1.4.0.0 XP Pro SP2 POP3 Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
[Known] folder
Just had to install TB on another computer and have finally gotten everything working right. I'm thoroughly enjoying the upgrades to both TB and Bayesit -- most everything that bothered me is gone with the new versions. But I can't find the filter to make the Known folder work. This is TB v3.0.1.33 and Bayesit 0.7.3. I'm quite sure it's obvious, but I'm throwing in the towelhelp? Thanks! Sharyn Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [Known] folder
Hello Sharyn, Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 9:16:13 AM, you wrote: S Just had to install TB on another computer and have finally gotten S everything working right. I'm thoroughly enjoying the upgrades to S both TB and Bayesit -- most everything that bothered me is gone S with the new versions. But I can't find the filter to make the S Known folder work. This is TB v3.0.1.33 and Bayesit 0.7.3. I'm S quite sure it's obvious, but I'm throwing in the towelhelp? On the options tab for the Known filter, is the box for making the filter Active checked? -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php Tagline of the day: Moderator Justification No.1: Because I'm the Moderator; that's why! Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [Known] folder
Leif writes: On the options tab for the Known filter, is the box for making the filter Active checked? You just fixed my problem, Leif -- thanks! And I've added the dash-dash-space-return to my templates too. I didn't know that trick (though I bet it's in the welcome file and I'd just forgotten it) Thanks again! Sharyn -- Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [Known] folder
Hello Sharyn, Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 10:20:58 AM, you wrote: S You just fixed my problem, Leif -- thanks! And I've added the S dash-dash-space-return to my templates too. I didn't know that S trick (though I bet it's in the welcome file and I'd just forgotten S it) You're very welcome, and thank you for fixing your sig delimiter. Just one FYI though, you might want to put it above your name so people won't have to cut it out by hand (see below). Take care. S Sharyn -- __ TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B ( ) ( ___)(_ _)( ___) TBUDP Wiki Site: http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp )(__ )__) _)(_ )__) Roguemoticons: http://PCWize.com/thebat ()()()(__)PCWSmileys: http://PCWize.com/thebat/pcwsmileys.php Tagline of the day: Hundreds of randomly inserted taglines and look which one you got! Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [Known] folder
Hello Sharyn, On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:16:13 -0500 GMT (09/02/2005, 23:16 +0700 GMT), Sharyn Hutchens wrote: SH But I can't find the filter to make the Known folder work. This is SH TB v3.0.1.33 Account / Sorting Office / Incoming / Known It works on email addresses in your addressbook. -- Cheers, Thomas. ZWIEBELN statt Kiwis kaufen! Sie sind laenger haltbar und ausserdem preiswerter. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter explanation
Hello Anthony, Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 10:37:14 PM, you wrote: AGA Since nobody has stepped forward to clarify the details of how the known AGA filter works and it isn't documented anywhere that I can find, I can AGA only assume that it is top secret and not intended to actually be used. AGA Is this correct? How would you like it to work? In Version 2 of The Bat! the directory was automatically created if you selected use Known filter. You could then tell it what Address book groups to watch for names of people you considered Known. This was selected in the Sorting Office. In the New Version 3, there is no self creating filter, so all you have to do is create the filter the way you would like it to operate. My Known inbox just uses Address book contains sender. My Inbox is described as Known but is called Inbox Known in the folder tree. I guess this is a hold over from the old sorting office. You can if you want tell it to only look in certain Address book groups. If your Known Inbox was created by Upgrading from version 2, I would just delete the criteria part and recreate it the way you want it. Depending on when you upgraded there was some bugs in the process that caused errors. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter explanation
Stuart Cuddy writes: How would you like it to work? Well, since you ask: Ideally for me, this filter would allow me to match some arbitrary field(s) in the message against entries in the address book, potentially using regular expressions, and would allow me to move messages that match to specific folders based on some arbitrary field in the message. In other words, with one filter, I'd be able to look for specific matches against the address book and file all messages from a given person in the AB into a specific folder for that person. So messages from John would go into a folder called (perhaps) JohnMail, and filters from Jane would go into a folder called JaneMail, and so on. The advantage would be that I wouldn't have to define a filter for everyone I know and for whom I'd like to file mail in a specific folder. Right now most of my filters are for specific individuals, sending their e-mails to specific folders. If your Known Inbox was created by Upgrading from version 2, I would just delete the criteria part and recreate it the way you want it. Depending on when you upgraded there was some bugs in the process that caused errors. I have a folder called Inbox - Known under my account, but I don't understand what it is for or how it works. I did create the current tree by upgrading from version 2. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter explanation
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else 13-Okt-2004 18:18, you wrote: Right now most of my filters are for specific individuals, sending their e-mails to specific folders. You could do this with Virtual Folders more easily, and include the replies you sent to that person to allow for a real conversation thread with that person (or AB group). I'm using a known filter to move messages from my inbox to more global directories like friends family (or work or colleagues, or whatever, its just to have them away from the inbox as known), and from there they are picked up by Virtual Folders where needed. The VF's are set so that they filter both where the particular person (or AB group) is either sender or recipient. Maybe you like the idea. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 without smilies :-P Deliplayer2 is playing: Say Anything by William Orbit from the 1996 album 'Strange Cargo - Hinterland' Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Known filter explanation
Since nobody has stepped forward to clarify the details of how the known filter works and it isn't documented anywhere that I can find, I can only assume that it is top secret and not intended to actually be used. Is this correct? -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter explanation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Anthony, On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Anthony mused about Known filter explanation (at least in part): AGA Since nobody has stepped forward to clarify the details of how the known AGA filter works and it isn't documented anywhere that I can find, I can AGA only assume that it is top secret and not intended to actually be used. AGA Is this correct? That is correct. My experience is this: Any email that comes from any email address in your addressbook is known and goes in the known folder. Other people say that only emails that comes from your account email address (i.e.: sent by you to you) are known and go to the known folder. - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA Ecclesiastic Philosopher Critic Teacher :einsteinyoyo: == Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 Windows XP 5.1 (2600-Service Pack 2) Ponder this: Coarse and violent nudity. Occasional language. morning dayevening === 20:48 Spam Stats, last Week (BayesIt! 0.7.3) Total Spam Emails: 74 Total Clean Emails: 510 BayesIT guessed right 96.27451% of the time My email is 12.671233% spam = -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: iQA/AwUBQWylvPvT94bCV8K0EQIPkACfQsspSSxRDqo4oRekenxUGP7pxfIAn0Zt pY1vYWxmsg532kOu1B7hOGdR =H7rR -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: How do known filters work?
Hi On Sunday, 10 October, 2004, at 3:50:11 PM, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: It doesn't seem to work when I try it. Have you selected which address books to use? I have them unchecked as I do not wish to use this feature. Also, what gets generated in place of $KNOWN$ for a folder name in which to place the messages? Inbox - Known (at least in v2) -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter...
Hallo Thorvald, On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:56:53 +0200GMT (10-10-2004, 16:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: Incoming filters (including subfilters) don't care about the folder where the message is. TN My incoming filters in v1.x and 2.x have always (at least for me) TN treated the mails from my Inbox only as Incoming mail. That's right, that changed with the NFS -- Groetjes, Roelof Say it with flowers. Give her a Triffid The Bat! 3.0.1 RC6 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpXz8lvFB8gG.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter...
Hallo Alexander, On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:19:58 +0200GMT (10-10-2004, 17:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: You'd have to set up a final subfilter that will move the message to your general newsletter location if it wasn't caught by any other subfilter before. I just tested this. No need for a final subfilter. And no dupes. ASK So I've been talking crap again. Thanks for testing it. ASK (...though I could swear I ended up with dupes when two filters had a match ASK for the same message both were move action filters...) In the beginning stages of the NFS that occurred to me too. Was one the many bugs that got cured. -- Groetjes, Roelof Dogmatism: Puppyism come to its full growth. The Bat! 3.0.1 RC6 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN pgpeFeZiy9jHw.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Known filter...
Hæ!
I am experiencing something strange.
I activated a Known filter for one account which uses:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [F41F9220.01C4A5F6.4920F440.19A28B47]
Name: Known
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`11`0`0`0\0D\0A}
MoveMessage folder \5C\5CMyAccountName\5CInbox\20-\20Known
IsContinue
IsActive
Ignore
IsSendQueue
endFilter
It is set before my SPAM-filters get active (so the known filter is
the last filter for valid emails).
I now and then receive some emails which get sorted to specific
folders before they get in touch with the known filter, but somehow
the known filter kicks in and re-sorts those mails into the known
folder.
Anybody else experienced this behaviour?
In v1.xx und v2.xx it worked eithout such annoyances.
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.1 RC5
| PopFile v0.22.0
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter...
Hello Thorvald, Saturday, October 9, 2004, 8:12:57 AM, you wrote: TN It is set before my SPAM-filters get active (so the known filter is TN the last filter for valid emails). TN I now and then receive some emails which get sorted to specific TN folders before they get in touch with the known filter, but somehow TN the known filter kicks in and re-sorts those mails into the known TN folder. Do your other filters have Continue Processing with other Filters turned on? If they do then this is what should happen. Yes/No. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1 RC6 On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter...
Hæ! Saturday, October 9, 2004, 16:43, Stuart Cuddy wrote: Do your other filters have Continue Processing with other Filters turned on? Yes, sure. If they do then this is what should happen. Yes/No. I do not think so, at least from my old view how filters worked in OFS. I did not set up new filters when I upgraded from v2.xx to v3.xx; I am still using my old setup (which I had to tweak in v3). E.g.: I have got an email from a contact which is in my addressbook, but he is also on a mailinglist. I have set my filters up to first check if any email is send to a mailinglist. If this is true, it should be moved from the inbox to a specific list folder. If untrue, the next filter should take over. At the end of the filter list, I have my known filter. If now the sender is in my address book and on the same mailinglist, the mail does get moved from the mailinglist folder to the Inbox - Known-folder. Which wasn't the case in v1.xx and v2.xx, where it resided happily in the folder where the first filter put it. It seems the Known filter checks all new messages, irrevelant where the new messages are, even when they are already moved out of the Inbox before it is its turn. Or do I have to specify a Source Folder for the Known filter in NFS now? -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.1 RC5 | PopFile v0.22.0 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Known filter...
Hello Thorvald, Saturday, October 9, 2004, 12:49:55 PM, you wrote: Do your other filters have Continue Processing with other Filters turned on? TN Yes, sure. I think this is your problem. Filter 1 - Filters it to the list folder. Filter Known - if Continue processing is turned on in Filter 1 will then send the message to the Known folder. - if Continue processing is turned off in Filter 1 will not be acted on. This is different than how the OFS worked. In other words don't turn on Continue Processing unless you want further actions on the current message. Messages not caught by Filter 1 will still be caught by the Know filter. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1 RC6 On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Virtual folders and known filters
Hello Lynn, 04-Sep-2004 06:42, you wrote: ASK What if you alter the filtering rules to something... simple? There is no filtering to that folder that I'm aware of - am I missing something? Right-click on the Virtual Folder and open its properties. There's a tab Filter. Is the checkbox use filter ticked? Virtual Folders are being filtered into not the common way. If you think of the messages in a normal folder as a database, then a Virtual Folder is a certain viewpoint to that database - by defining Virtual Folder filter rules you tell the virtual folder you only want to see messages of this-and-that type (according to your filter rules). For example, you could track any private conversation between you and me by creating a virtual folder that watches your inbox and your sent-mail folder with a filter applied so that it will show only messages from/to you/me. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) It is better to have loft and lost than to never have loft at all. -- Groucho Marx Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Virtual folders and known filters
Friday, September 3, 2004, 10:29:40 AM, you wrote: MM I know it cannot help *now*, when the corruption MM already happened, but it can save lots of future MM screams, and perhaps modify them to the ones of a MM pleasure. (-: Hmm. Well, that folder wasn't one that I restored with TB's utility, it's just one I made on *this* particular install .. so whatever the problem is, it didn't happen there. It's not watching any folders. I changed its name. But it still claims the parked messages are there, and won't be deleted sigh MM Just to say, yet, that TB has no any Recover option, MM its just Restore one. One should be careful with it. It's always worked well for me, so far anyway. It did restore my AB with no hitches .. *that* was something of a relief! lol! Thanks for continuing to puzzle over it .. there *must* be some way to get rid of it .. it's a constant testimony to my clumsiness sitting there at the end of the folder list! Lynn TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Virtual folders and known filters
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 1:12:45 AM, you wrote: ASK Right-click on the Virtual Folder and open its ASK properties. There's a tab ASK Filter. Is the checkbox use filter ticked? Nothing is ticked in the properties for that filter except 'remove old messages' and 'compress the folder' .. actually, there was never any box checked on the filter tab. ASK Virtual Folders are being filtered into not the ASK common way. If you think of the messages in a ASK normal folder as a database, then a Virtual Folder ASK is a certain viewpoint to that database - by ASK defining Virtual Folder filter rules you tell the ASK virtual folder you only want to see messages of ASK this-and-that type (according to your filter rules). OK .. that's nice to know. ASK For example, you could track any private conversation ASK between you and me by creating a virtual folder that ASK watches your inbox and your sent-mail folder with a ASK filter applied so that it will show only messages ASK from/to you/me. And again .. but still doesn't apply. Thanks for trying though .. Lynn TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Virtual folders and known filters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Thu, 2 Sep 2004, at 16:45:47 -0700, @ @ when Lynn wrote: Thursday, September 2, 2004, 3:43:48 PM, you wrote: However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox folder which I can't now get rid of; it says there are parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can find, but I can't delete it. M Can't you rename it? And/or change the folder(s) it M is watching? I can rename it, but that doesn't help. I unchecked the folder it was watching, but that didn't help either. It's *sure* there are parked messages there, but it won't show them, and I can't figure out how to get rid of them. I ran maintenance, but that didn't change anything. It was saying 174 messages in it, though showing none, and I managed to delete them, or at least it's not showing them any more, but it *still* says there are parked messages ... Aaarrrghhh! I now the feeling. It's nice if a (wo)man is able to scream; the really serious trouble begins in a silence. (-: As I can see you were using so called Backup function of TB. I did it only once, and then yet another time, and it was nuff to me... to learn to *never* use it for any backup. Simply because it *damages* files, and it *cannot* be recovered. For back-up I use an ordinary archiving program (as Arj, or WinZip...), because it is *much* safer. If by any chance such archive is corrupted (but this type of corruption is very, very rare; it happened to me only once, and just because HDD was damaged) it *can* be recovered (to the decent degree, and sometimes even entirely), which with TB's Backup utility it is *not* possible. That's one of reasons I keep my Mail folder separately, on a separate partition, and am doing its complete backup, just by (recursively) compressing entire folder (with all subfolders and files in it). Then I do the same with TB folder. And finally am copying TB registry entry (usually to the compressed Mail folder). Then I always am able to restore my mail and all my settings, even after a worst play with something nasty, as with TBv3, for instance. And all of that just in few minutes (about 20.000 letters in this moment, and ~400 folders, 2-3 active accounts and about 20 inactive ones). I know it cannot help *now*, when the corruption already happened, but it can save lots of future screams, and perhaps modify them to the ones of a pleasure. (-: Just to say, yet, that TB has no any Recover option, its just Restore one. One should be careful with it. - -- Mica :happypiglet: PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQFBOKoD9q62QPd3XuIRAsiDAJwONVnq+zabbzUBaIYr/F4zEreFjgCfdW0D ZsMQKmf+xcQhEvEgP1oFERM= =BqJv -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Virtual folders and known filters
Friday, September 3, 2004, 5:13:55 AM, you wrote: It was saying 174 messages in it, though showing none, and I managed to delete them, or at least it's not showing them any more, but it *still* says there are parked messages ... ASK What if you alter the filtering rules to something... ASK simple? There is no filtering to that folder that I'm aware of - am I missing something? Lynn TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Virtual folders and known filters
Hello Lynn, However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox folder which I can't now get rid of; it says there are parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can find, but I can't delete it. Can't you rename it? And/or change the folder(s) it is watching? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.12.00 Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Virtual folders and known filters
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 3:43:48 PM, you wrote: However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox folder which I can't now get rid of; it says there are parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can find, but I can't delete it. M Can't you rename it? And/or change the folder(s) it M is watching? I can rename it, but that doesn't help. I unchecked the folder it was watching, but that didn't help either. It's *sure* there are parked messages there, but it won't show them, and I can't figure out how to get rid of them. I ran maintenance, but that didn't change anything. It was saying 174 messages in it, though showing none, and I managed to delete them, or at least it's not showing them any more, but it *still* says there are parked messages ... Aaarrrghhh! Lynn TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Virtual folders and known filters
Hi all - I have a frustrating problem. When I installed the first v2 TB, something bad happened to my templates, and I hoped that installing v2.12 would fix them. As it didn't, (apparently when I imported the backups, I imported the problem too) I deinstalled and reinstalled. Naturally, that dumped my message base, and I had hoped to recover that somehow, but apparently I'm going to have to do without it. I recovered some with the import tool, but most won't work. Possibly because they are in subfolders? However, in messing around I created a virtual inbox folder which I can't now get rid of; it says there are parked messages in it, which there are not, that I can find, but I can't delete it. Finding RitLab's announcement when I logged in this morning didn't help ... :-( I'm not sure I want to go through the whole reinstall thing again, and have to rebuild all my filters - which brings me to a weird thing that's happening with my known filters ... there are at least 4 of them and for a while they kept shifting to the top of the list ... that seems to have stopped, but I can't delete the extras .. anybody got an idea what's going on here? tia, Lynn TBv.2.12.00 NT5 SP4 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2 http://www.turriff.net Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Lost Inbox-Known
Hello, Anyone know how to get it back? Thanks -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 pgpdGJieGYy2z.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Lost Inbox-Known
Hello Darrin, DR Anyone know how to get it back? DR Thanks I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$ that will add it back. when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as : $KNOWN$ with the $ on both sides. -- Best regards, Paul Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Lost Inbox-Known
Hi Paul, On 7/22/2004 12:10 PM my time, Paul wrote: PC I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$ PC that will add it back. PC when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as : PC $KNOWN$ PC with the $ on both sides. That did the trick thanks :) -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 pgpVStHHtT5QZ.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...)
Hi, I apologize if I do not respect rules. You explain these rules but I am French and I've a lot of difficulties to understand what was wrong in my post and what you explain to me. So I try to find somebody who can translate and explain your mail and the rules. AT the time I stop mail and I apologize again to all the users of the list for my mistakes. I will be back as soon as I will understand how the list work. Thank you Sincerely, WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==Original message text=== From: Leif Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 9:36:09 PM Subject: Mod: Top posting (was: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...) LG Hi WilWilWil, LG On Tue, 25 May 2004, at 21:33:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:33 PM where LG I live) you wrote: W It is the only one filter... LG moderator LG Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not LG just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have LG instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out WilWilWil. LG This posting violated the list rules regarding top posting. LG Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your LG message and following it with all quoted text below, is not LG encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list LG because LG a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the LGtop of the message LG and LG b) It encourages excessive quoting. LG We would much prefer if you quote just that much of the message to LG which you're replying, so we know what it is you're referring to, LG and then below the quotation, type your response. If you're LG responding to more than one part of the original, then quote each LG part separately and follow each part with your response. LG Now, I know that you may not personally prefer this format and that LG you may disagree with some of the reasoning here. We very much LG respect this. However, this is the format that most of the active LG members here prefer and all members are expected, and are being LG asked to use the format that will make most of the active membership LG here comfortable reading. You'll likely get a more responsive group LG when you post using a style that is comfortable for them to read and LG understand. LG Thank you. LG /moderator ===End of original message text=== Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...)
Hello WilWilWil, Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 9:49:00 AM, you wrote: WilWilWil I apologize if I do not respect rules. You explain these WilWilWil rules but I am French and I've a lot of difficulties to WilWilWil understand what was wrong in my post and what you explain WilWilWil to me. No problem. We're all learning! :-) The rule is not to post your reply to the top of the reply. Instead, put your reply underneath what they said. Or, like I am doing here, where I reply to individual pieces of your message, is called in-line quoting. WilWilWil So I try to find somebody who can translate and explain WilWilWil your mail and the rules. AT the time I stop mail and I WilWilWil apologize again to all the users of the list for my WilWilWil mistakes. Please don't stop posting. We'd like to hear from you, and we're here to give help where needed. Marck, Allie, and I are more than willing to help you understand the rules. WilWilWil I will be back as soon as I will understand how the list WilWilWil work. We'll be here for you... :-) -- Leif (TB list moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 2.11 Beta/6 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...
Hello WilWilWil, On Monday, May 24, 2004, 6:04:21 PM, Peter answered you: W WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses W book) go to the receipt folder W and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ? P Is the Known filter activated? (Account » Sorting Office/Filters » P Incoming mail) And if this filter is active is it before the other filters or on the bottom? -- Cheers, Edgar Communicating with TB! v2.10.03, Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative. --Oscar Wilde To request my public key select this url: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0pp2Cmsx5v.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...
Hi, It is the only one filter... WilWilWil [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==Original message text=== From: Edgar van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2004, 8:38:38 AM Subject: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder... EvD Hello WilWilWil, EvD On Monday, May 24, 2004, 6:04:21 PM, Peter answered you: W WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses W book) go to the receipt folder W and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ? P Is the Known filter activated? (Account » Sorting Office/Filters » P Incoming mail) EvD And if this filter is active is it before the other filters or on EvD the bottom? ===End of original message text=== Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...
Hi, I have my friends in my Addresses Book. I 've say to TB in general parameters that this addresses book is the default addresses book. I've said to TB in the account parameters that it is my default addresses book. And the rules for in going mails of the account are well set with the correct addresses book checked. WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses book) go to the receipt folder and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ? Thanks WilWilWil (France) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with mail and $KNOWN$ folder...
Hi WilWilWil, on Mon, 24 May 2004 16:38:37 +0200GMT, you wrote: W WHY the mails of my friends (who are in my addresses book) go to the receipt folder W and not in the KNOWN receipt folder ? Is the Known filter activated? (Account » Sorting Office/Filters » Incoming mail) -- Cheers Peter Software isn't released, it's allowed to escape. Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
Sunday, February 29, 2004, Allister Jenks wrote: Alas, this does not seem to be possible? Play on sound on incoming mail in the folder that $known$ filters to and set the $known$ filter to continue processing. -- Urban A harp is a nude piano. Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
Monday, March 1, 2004, 1:22:12 PM, Urban wrote: U Sunday, February 29, 2004, Allister Jenks wrote: Alas, this does not seem to be possible? U Play on sound on incoming mail in the folder that $known$ filters to and U set the $known$ filter to continue processing. Thanks Urban. I did not know about the sound settings at folder level. I've set it up and will await some mail! -- Cheers, Allister Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 6:09:05 AM, Allister Jenks wrote: AJ Yes, I know it *is* special, but I had an idea that I wanted a AJ sound to be played when something was filtered by it - i.e. some AJ *real* email has arrived. There's an option to Play sound on the Actions tab of the filter, which includes the option to play the wav file of your choice - is that what you're looking for? -- Deborah No one can liberate the slave who loves his chains. Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
Hi Deborah, on Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:59:55 +GMT, you wrote: DW On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 6:09:05 AM, Allister Jenks wrote: AJ Yes, I know it *is* special, but I had an idea that I wanted a AJ sound to be played when something was filtered by it - i.e. some AJ *real* email has arrived. DW There's an option to Play sound on the Actions tab of the filter, DW which includes the option to play the wav file of your choice I can't find this for the built-in $known$ filters or folders... As a work around, you can create your own Known folder with all the options of a normal folder including sound. -- Cheers Peter The irony of life is that no one gets out alive... Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
Hello Deborah, There's an option to Play sound on the Actions tab of the filter, which includes the option to play the wav file of your choice Not in the Known filter :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
On Sunday, February 29, 2004, 10:57:33 AM, MAU wrote: M Not in the Known filter :) I should read subject-lines, shouldn't I? :-) -- Deborah We seek the truth and will endure the consequences. Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Known filter special?
Hello Deborah, I should read subject-lines, shouldn't I? :-) What is a subject line? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.04.7 Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Known filter special?
Hello TBUDLers, Yes, I know it *is* special, but I had an idea that I wanted a sound to be played when something was filtered by it - i.e. some *real* email has arrived. Alas, this does not seem to be possible? -- Cheers, Allister Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
known
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am I right in thinking that all messages caught by this filter would end up in the same mailbox? I currently have filters for individuals or groups that move messages from them (and to them as I have myself set up as a bcc to all outgoing messages) but managing each of them for multiple accounts can be a pain, but I don't think I can achieve the same thing with the known filter. Am I right? - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/53 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com I used to work in a blanket factory, but it folded. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 Comment: Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com; iQA/AwUBQCJOENttnLhkydF1EQIgUQCdFpqSiZeKZGE4GkW9O+DwdDbCEYkAoMG/ KaIQDDNUa6lNoTt05N7t11vn =B5ON -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: known
Hello shemming, Am I right in thinking that all messages caught by this filter would end up in the same mailbox? Yes, you are. I currently have filters for individuals or groups that move messages from them (and to them as I have myself set up as a bcc to all outgoing messages) but managing each of them for multiple accounts can be a pain, but I don't think I can achieve the same thing with the known filter. Am I right? Yes, you are. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: known
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 M Yes, you are. Bugger! Another plan bites the big one. TVM. - -- Stuart Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/53 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com One seventh of your life is spent on Monday. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0 Comment: Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com; iQA/AwUBQCJSItttnLhkydF1EQLA8gCgzVKh6ZT2tA6Ho7Jimcj6hIVyeQQAn2DG z6pEocK2CqrxzOavJHmKW+5t =l1FD -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
KNOWN folder
The KNOWN folder has no Identity property that will allow me to write my friends from a 'safe' return address? -- Rich Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: KNOWN folder
Hallo rich, On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 02:20:11 -0500GMT (3-11-03, 8:20 +0100, where I live), you wrote: rg The KNOWN folder has no Identity property that will allow rg me to write my friends from a 'safe' return address? That means you'll have to use a 'safe' address as main address for your account or that you create an AB group that includes all of your friends and that has templates set with either the %from or %account macro. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Logic for the Inbox - Known filtering
Hello Marck, MDP There is no definitive list that I know of. We'll have to beg for a MDP straight answer from one of the programmers. Maybe we should ask on MDP TBBETA? The list is right. Currently, From, Reply-To, Return-Path and Sender fields are used. I've seen the message from Bill about Resent-From missing. It'll be fixed, obviously. :-) -- Best regards, Stefan ...If a program is useful, it will have to be changed. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Logic for the Inbox - Known filtering
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 10:37:12 PM, MikeD wrote: So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am still trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I have hopes for the new bayesian plug-in for TB. Does anyone have any more information on this plugin? For instance, a web page, who is working on it, if it's been released yet? Thanks. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Logic for the Inbox - Known filtering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Audiac, @19-Jul-2003, 19:31 +0200 (18:31 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am still trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I have hopes for the new bayesian plug-in for TB. A Does anyone have any more information on this plugin? For A instance, a web page, who is working on it, if it's been released A yet? Right now all is unofficial since it is built for TB 1.63, which is currently deep in beta testing. Only 1.63 has plug-in support for spam processing. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBPxvC9znkJKuSnc2gEQLZygCfTEoC/Sk+e6RriDWdX0p9+myhmHkAoJVc JJwgVRvpGRERAJTw+S9Doa+E =JTOX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Logic for the Inbox - Known filtering
Hello Bill, On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:14:54 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 11:14 +0700 GMT), Bill McCarthy wrote: I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB: What is the reason? For both BCCing and test mails to myself. I don't like auto complete turned on. It's much easier to simply type 'me'. I see. Different folks... I was just curious. Thanks. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons. -- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of science, 1949 Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Logic for the Inbox - Known filtering
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:07:53 PM, WL wrote: W Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:28:47 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote: DK I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to DK get e-mail from will send a note that has spam-like material DK in it. W ...but that defeats the purpose of training material. Within W popfile, one can create magnets to force a classification, W or just let popfile work its mathemagic and train the email W detection. I use magnets lightly, but maintaining magnets is a hassle when I've already got those folks in my AB. -- Dave Kennedy Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
