[Touch-packages] [Bug 1772975] Re: /lib/udev/ifupdown-hotplug is not executable
On checking this again with ifupdown 0.8.34ubuntu2 the file is now executable. ** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772975 Title: /lib/udev/ifupdown-hotplug is not executable Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.10 dev with ifupdown 0.8.32ubuntu1 and /lib/udev /ifupdown-hotplug is not executable resulting in an error message at boot about missing permissions on that file and some negative side- effects (like /sys/class/net/eth0/carrier containing 0 instead of 1 which might break things). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1772975/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729192] Re: Shutdown needs often longer than usual
After I updated irqbalance to the next major version (shortly after your last message from 2017) the issue didn't appear anymore since then. ** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729192 Title: Shutdown needs often longer than usual Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 dev with irqbalance 1.1.0-2.3ubuntu1 and for some weeks on shutting down the system often (around 50%-75%) I'm seeing that the irqbalance job needs some seconds to shutdown causing to delay the system shutdown noticeable. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1729192/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1772975] [NEW] /lib/udev/ifupdown-hotplug is not executable
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 18.10 dev with ifupdown 0.8.32ubuntu1 and /lib/udev /ifupdown-hotplug is not executable resulting in an error message at boot about missing permissions on that file and some negative side- effects (like /sys/class/net/eth0/carrier containing 0 instead of 1 which might break things). ** Affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772975 Title: /lib/udev/ifupdown-hotplug is not executable Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.10 dev with ifupdown 0.8.32ubuntu1 and /lib/udev /ifupdown-hotplug is not executable resulting in an error message at boot about missing permissions on that file and some negative side- effects (like /sys/class/net/eth0/carrier containing 0 instead of 1 which might break things). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1772975/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729192] Re: Shutdown needs often longer than usual
I have extended the test a bit by instead of testing if a manual irqbalance shutdown is fast or slow I have tested if the system shutdown is also delayed if irqbalance is manually shutdown before a system shutdown. I have made a few system shutdowns with and without irqbalance running and in the cases where irqbalance was running the most times the system shutdown was delayed with systemd blaming the irqbalance job on the console while without irqbalance running the system shutdown was always fast. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729192 Title: Shutdown needs often longer than usual Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: New Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 dev with irqbalance 1.1.0-2.3ubuntu1 and for some weeks on shutting down the system often (around 50%-75%) I'm seeing that the irqbalance job needs some seconds to shutdown causing to delay the system shutdown noticeable. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1729192/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729192] Re: Shutdown needs often longer than usual
> 1. does on the system running also take quite some time if you do like "systemctl stop irqbalance"? I have tested this now multiple times by stopping and starting it again and all looked fine. > 2. I'd assume that systemd concurrently stops multiple things and irqbalance > is just the last to print but not the one you are actually waiting on. Based on the above this might be true. So is it a known issue that systemd prints wrong things? I think this is an issue that should be actually fixed before tinkering around on every shutdow delay issue (also [1] blames that [2] isn't reliable enough so it would eventually also make sense to wait for [1]'s implementation). ** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729192 Title: Shutdown needs often longer than usual Status in irqbalance package in Ubuntu: New Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 dev with irqbalance 1.1.0-2.3ubuntu1 and for some weeks on shutting down the system often (around 50%-75%) I'm seeing that the irqbalance job needs some seconds to shutdown causing to delay the system shutdown noticeable. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1729192/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729086] [NEW] Upgrading fontconfig-config causes fonts to look aliased
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 dev and upgrading fontconfig-config to version 2.12.6-0ubuntu1 changed its dependencies from "fonts-dejavu-core | ttf- bitstream-vera | fonts-freefont-ttf | gsfonts-x11, ucf (>= 0.29)" to "ucf (>= 0.29), fonts-dejavu-core | ttf-bitstream-vera | fonts- liberation | fonts-freefont" which caused at default fonts-dejavu-core being additionally installed. My system has also ttf-mscorefonts-installer installed which utilizes custom rules to emulate the sharp looking fonts behavior Windows systems had. But installing fonts-dejavu-core alone causes this sharp look to get aliased again in the most places. A workaround for fontconfig-config is to install fonts-liberation as it seems to not break the sharp look. I can't tell exactly which of the 3 possible packages is the main cause for this issue: - Is that the installation of fonts-dejavu-core alone breaks the look a bug? - Needs ttf-mscorefonts-installer an update to take over priority or such? - Or is it possible that fontconfig-config could also technically support ttf-mscorefonts-installer as additional fonts dependency choice? ** Affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: fonts-dejavu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: fonts-dejavu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729086 Title: Upgrading fontconfig-config causes fonts to look aliased Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Status in fonts-dejavu package in Ubuntu: New Status in msttcorefonts package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 dev and upgrading fontconfig-config to version 2.12.6-0ubuntu1 changed its dependencies from "fonts-dejavu-core | ttf-bitstream-vera | fonts-freefont-ttf | gsfonts-x11, ucf (>= 0.29)" to "ucf (>= 0.29), fonts-dejavu-core | ttf-bitstream-vera | fonts- liberation | fonts-freefont" which caused at default fonts-dejavu-core being additionally installed. My system has also ttf-mscorefonts-installer installed which utilizes custom rules to emulate the sharp looking fonts behavior Windows systems had. But installing fonts-dejavu-core alone causes this sharp look to get aliased again in the most places. A workaround for fontconfig-config is to install fonts-liberation as it seems to not break the sharp look. I can't tell exactly which of the 3 possible packages is the main cause for this issue: - Is that the installation of fonts-dejavu-core alone breaks the look a bug? - Needs ttf-mscorefonts-installer an update to take over priority or such? - Or is it possible that fontconfig-config could also technically support ttf-mscorefonts-installer as additional fonts dependency choice? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1729086/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1718231] [NEW] Mismatch in type-ahead search of the GTKFileChooser causes the first file to get the focus
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 17.10 dev with libgtk-3-0 3.22.19-0ubuntu1 and initially this issue was reported at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764668 . If the GTKFileChooser gets opened and something is typed that causes a mismatch the first file gets deselected but instead it gets now a focus (which it hadn't before) which might be a bug. ** Affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718231 Title: Mismatch in type-ahead search of the GTKFileChooser causes the first file to get the focus Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.10 dev with libgtk-3-0 3.22.19-0ubuntu1 and initially this issue was reported at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764668 . If the GTKFileChooser gets opened and something is typed that causes a mismatch the first file gets deselected but instead it gets now a focus (which it hadn't before) which might be a bug. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1718231/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1707094] [NEW] Option to set the hardware clock
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 17.10 dev with coreutils 8.26-3ubuntu3 and it seems the command date is only capable of to set the software clock. I think it would make sense to also add an option that does additionally immediately update the hardware clock. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707094 Title: Option to set the hardware clock Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.10 dev with coreutils 8.26-3ubuntu3 and it seems the command date is only capable of to set the software clock. I think it would make sense to also add an option that does additionally immediately update the hardware clock. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1707094/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1681190] Re: I/O errors on disc from optical drive can block raising the network
I assume I shall do this if this issue appears again with a damaged disc. If I have one again in the future I'm attaching the output in case I don't forget it then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681190 Title: I/O errors on disc from optical drive can block raising the network Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with systemd 232-21ubuntu2 and I'm using an automounter which does also mount discs in optical drives and on having a damaged disk (from too much overwriting) in /dev/sr0 inserted I'm getting I/O errors as expected (blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0) but the console shows then "A start job is running for Raise network interfaces" with a maximum time of 5 minutes and 2 seconds which doesn't progress until I'm ejecting the disc in /dev/sr0. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1681190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1681190] Re: I/O errors on disc from optical drive can block raising the network
Difficult to tell as I'm normally always using the packaged systemd from the official Ubuntu repository but as I'm on the development version of Ubuntu it should be more or less recent. Otherwise I have to wait until a version >= the current git lands into the repository to test it. Also the damaged disc has already been disposed of but since I'm overwriting often discs one of them will get damaged earlier or later again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681190 Title: I/O errors on disc from optical drive can block raising the network Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with systemd 232-21ubuntu2 and I'm using an automounter which does also mount discs in optical drives and on having a damaged disk (from too much overwriting) in /dev/sr0 inserted I'm getting I/O errors as expected (blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0) but the console shows then "A start job is running for Raise network interfaces" with a maximum time of 5 minutes and 2 seconds which doesn't progress until I'm ejecting the disc in /dev/sr0. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1681190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 964775] Re: Boot is delayed due to missing static network interface
Edit: Now at the next boot the maximum time the job shows to wait was 5 minutes and 3 seconds so the time seems to get a bit generated for some reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964775 Title: Boot is delayed due to missing static network interface Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: /etc/init/failsafe.conf gets stuck waiting for the static interfaces in /etc/network/interfaces to come up as one of them is a hotplug device. I have a BeagleBone which shows up as a USB Ethernet gadget and a rule in interfaces to set the IP addresses when it's plugged in. The rule is: auto usb9 iface usb9 inet static address 192.168.7.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward up iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT up iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j MASQUERADE -s 192.168.7.0/24 down echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward down iptables -t nat -F POSTROUTING upstart waits for ths interface to be configured but as the device isn't there it never gets configured. Eventually failsafe kicks in but it adds 2 minutes to the boot. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: upstart 1.4-0ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-19.30-generic 3.2.11 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 26 09:40:56 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120219) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en SourcePackage: upstart UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/964775/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 964775] Re: Boot is delayed due to missing static network interface
The boot is still delayed even with systemd 232-21ubuntu2 on Ubuntu 17.04 dev if something causes the network not to get up (for example as it is happening here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1681190 ). Also the time the job does now wait (as shown) seems to be 5 minutes and 2 seconds which looks a bit crooked to me (I would expect something like 5 minutes then). ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964775 Title: Boot is delayed due to missing static network interface Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: /etc/init/failsafe.conf gets stuck waiting for the static interfaces in /etc/network/interfaces to come up as one of them is a hotplug device. I have a BeagleBone which shows up as a USB Ethernet gadget and a rule in interfaces to set the IP addresses when it's plugged in. The rule is: auto usb9 iface usb9 inet static address 192.168.7.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward up iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT up iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -j MASQUERADE -s 192.168.7.0/24 down echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward down iptables -t nat -F POSTROUTING upstart waits for ths interface to be configured but as the device isn't there it never gets configured. Eventually failsafe kicks in but it adds 2 minutes to the boot. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: upstart 1.4-0ubuntu9 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-19.30-generic 3.2.11 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 26 09:40:56 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120219) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_NZ:en SourcePackage: upstart UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/964775/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1681190] [NEW] I/O errors on disc from optical drive can block raising the network
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with systemd 232-21ubuntu2 and I'm using an automounter which does also mount discs in optical drives and on having a damaged disk (from too much overwriting) in /dev/sr0 inserted I'm getting I/O errors as expected (blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0) but the console shows then "A start job is running for Raise network interfaces" with a maximum time of 5 minutes and 2 seconds which doesn't progress until I'm ejecting the disc in /dev/sr0. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1681190 Title: I/O errors on disc from optical drive can block raising the network Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with systemd 232-21ubuntu2 and I'm using an automounter which does also mount discs in optical drives and on having a damaged disk (from too much overwriting) in /dev/sr0 inserted I'm getting I/O errors as expected (blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0) but the console shows then "A start job is running for Raise network interfaces" with a maximum time of 5 minutes and 2 seconds which doesn't progress until I'm ejecting the disc in /dev/sr0. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1681190/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1091792] Re: The disk drive for /tmp is not ready yet or not present
Edit: Weird, even as reporter I can't change the Won't Fix state. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091792 Title: The disk drive for /tmp is not ready yet or not present Status in mountall package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in mountall source package in Precise: Triaged Status in mountall source package in Quantal: Won't Fix Status in mountall source package in Trusty: Triaged Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with mountall 2.46 and on booting I'm getting the message "The disk drive for /tmp is not ready yet or not present". But it seems that this message doesn't make any troubles. I'm able to use /tmp without any problems. Maybe something is trying to mount /tmp too early. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1091792/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1091792] Re: The disk drive for /tmp is not ready yet or not present
mountall is still available in Ubuntu 17.04 dev and the bug might still exist in this package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091792 Title: The disk drive for /tmp is not ready yet or not present Status in mountall package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in mountall source package in Precise: Triaged Status in mountall source package in Quantal: Won't Fix Status in mountall source package in Trusty: Triaged Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with mountall 2.46 and on booting I'm getting the message "The disk drive for /tmp is not ready yet or not present". But it seems that this message doesn't make any troubles. I'm able to use /tmp without any problems. Maybe something is trying to mount /tmp too early. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1091792/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1164694] Re: Sound does not switch automatically to the HDMI port
If possible it could make sense to provide udev rules/systemd jobs for each action (keep, replicate and move) and for each output (audio, video, different ports, etc.) so that the user could easily disable/enable them to change the default behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164694 Title: Sound does not switch automatically to the HDMI port Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu: Opinion Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with alsa-utils 1.0.25-4ubuntu2. If I'm connecting a HDMI cable from my laptop to my tv the visual output is fine but the sound is not switching to the HDMI port. The sound is still playing from my laptop and I have to manually switch it to the HDMI port. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1164694/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640849] Re: Enhanced coloring of differences
** Description changed: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with diffutils 1:3.5-1 and currently only the lines are colored for added/removed ones. Maybe the differences in the lines which characters are added/removed can be colored too (for example - with a higher opacity) to make them easier to see. + with a higher background or foreground opacity) to make them easier to + see. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to diffutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640849 Title: Enhanced coloring of differences Status in diffutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with diffutils 1:3.5-1 and currently only the lines are colored for added/removed ones. Maybe the differences in the lines which characters are added/removed can be colored too (for example with a higher background or foreground opacity) to make them easier to see. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffutils/+bug/1640849/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines
So you have tried to reproduce this issue on a terminal and haven't seen mixed lines? For example they can look like this one: "Err:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty InReleasedn't create temporary file /tmp/apt.conf.eKCBxI for passing config to apt-key" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522988 Title: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.3 and I'm noticing that for example if on executing "apt-get update" error messages are shown they are often broken. They are missing sometimes characters which seem to be splitted across multiple lines. It looks that apt doesn't ensure writing complete lines if stdout and stderr are used. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1522988/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1486128] Re: Coloring of differences
** Changed in: diffutils (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to diffutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486128 Title: Coloring of differences Status in diffutils package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in diffutils package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with diffutils 1:3.3-1 and maybe diff can color added/removed lines green/red for example like git-gui does. Maybe this could also get enhanced to do this for the differences in the lines which characters are added/removed (for example with a higher opacity). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffutils/+bug/1486128/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640849] [NEW] Enhanced coloring of differences
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with diffutils 1:3.5-1 and currently only the lines are colored for added/removed ones. Maybe the differences in the lines which characters are added/removed can be colored too (for example with a higher opacity) to make them easier to see. ** Affects: diffutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to diffutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640849 Title: Enhanced coloring of differences Status in diffutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with diffutils 1:3.5-1 and currently only the lines are colored for added/removed ones. Maybe the differences in the lines which characters are added/removed can be colored too (for example with a higher opacity) to make them easier to see. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffutils/+bug/1640849/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640216] [NEW] /etc/systemd/system/ctrl-alt-del.target gets installed/overwritten
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with systemd 232-2git1 and I have masked some jobs to prevent them being started and one of them was ctrl-alt- del.target. But I'm noticing that on installing systemd it does now overwrite the file /etc/systemd/system/ctrl-alt-del.target which does then enable a reboot on pressing CTRL + ALT + DEL again. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640216 Title: /etc/systemd/system/ctrl-alt-del.target gets installed/overwritten Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 17.04 dev with systemd 232-2git1 and I have masked some jobs to prevent them being started and one of them was ctrl-alt- del.target. But I'm noticing that on installing systemd it does now overwrite the file /etc/systemd/system/ctrl-alt-del.target which does then enable a reboot on pressing CTRL + ALT + DEL again. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1640216/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522988] Re: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines
If I remember correctly the broken error messages were the one from this issue ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1524196 ) as they appeared around the same time. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522988 Title: stdout and stderr are not synced on lines Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.3 and I'm noticing that for example if on executing "apt-get update" error messages are shown they are often broken. They are missing sometimes characters which seem to be splitted across multiple lines. It looks that apt doesn't ensure writing complete lines if stdout and stderr are used. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1522988/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1524196] Re: Error on fetching several lists
Any idea to which package this issue belongs to? Normally I would have put it now to "Ubuntu" without assigning a package but it seems this is here not possible anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524196 Title: Error on fetching several lists Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.4 and on executing "apt-get update" I'm seeing several times errors like "Err:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InReleaseCouldn't create tempfiles for splitting up /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_xenial-updates_InRelease Could not execute 'apt-key' to verify signature (is gnupg installed?)" which results that these lists are not available. Downgrading to apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 from Ubuntu 15.10 solves this issue. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1524196/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1633712] Re: gnupg2 is missing as dependency while apt-key uses it
Does apt-key work without gnupg2? It seems that the most parts require it, for example I can't even list the keys without it. Wouldn't it make more sense to split apt-key into its own package and make gnupg2 a harddependency of it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633712 Title: gnupg2 is missing as dependency while apt-key uses it Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 with apt 1.3.1 and on using apt-key I got the following error: Error: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, Error: but apt-key requires gnupg, gnupg2 or gnupg1 for this operation. So maybe gnupg(2) should get a dependency of apt. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1633712/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1633712] [NEW] gnupg2 is missing as dependency while apt-key uses it
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 with apt 1.3.1 and on using apt-key I got the following error: Error: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, Error: but apt-key requires gnupg, gnupg2 or gnupg1 for this operation. So maybe gnupg(2) should get a dependency of apt. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633712 Title: gnupg2 is missing as dependency while apt-key uses it Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 with apt 1.3.1 and on using apt-key I got the following error: Error: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, Error: but apt-key requires gnupg, gnupg2 or gnupg1 for this operation. So maybe gnupg(2) should get a dependency of apt. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1633712/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1532944] Re: flashplugin-installer shows an error message after downloading the file with apt 1.1.x
I have removed the duplicate status as the linked ticket is now marked as "Fix Released" but with an up-to-date system I'm still able to reproduce the problem (I was also wondering a bit why the other ticket was only posted against aptitude). ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1537512 Can't drop privileges for downloading as file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532944 Title: flashplugin-installer shows an error message after downloading the file with apt 1.1.x Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in flashplugin-nonfree package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.10 and on trying to install flashplugin-installer I'm always getting an error message after the file got downloaded. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install flashplugin-installer --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libapt-inst1.7 libapt-pkg4.16 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/6838 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 99770 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../flashplugin-installer_11.2.202.559ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) over (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for update-notifier-common (3.164) ... flashplugin-installer: downloading http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Get:1 http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz [26.8 MB] Fetched 26.8 MB in 3min 8s (143 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Installing from local file /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Flash Plugin installed. Setting up flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1532944/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1623198] Re: Masking and then disabling dbus.service causes the system to freeze
@Martin: I would be fine if this action would throw me to the console and still accept input. But that the system does fully freeze without accepting any input similar to a kernel panic and that from an userspace process looks definitely not correct. What should be done now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623198 Title: Masking and then disabling dbus.service causes the system to freeze Status in dbus package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd-sysv 231-6 and if I'm executing the command "systemctl mask dbus.service" and then "systemctl stop dbus.service" the system does freeze after a few seconds (even switching to the console is not possible anymore). But booting then the system works fine without any freezes while dbus got successfully disabled. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1623198/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1623198] Re: Masking and then disabling dbus.service causes the system to freeze
No, switching to the console for example with CTRL + ALT + F1 doesn't work anymore (and the freeze causes also that constantly the last frame before the freeze is shown). ** Package changed: ubuntu => systemd (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623198 Title: Masking and then disabling dbus.service causes the system to freeze Status in dbus package in Ubuntu: New Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd-sysv 231-6 and if I'm executing the command "systemctl mask dbus.service" and then "systemctl stop dbus.service" the system does freeze after a few seconds (even switching to the console is not possible anymore). But booting then the system works fine without any freezes while dbus got successfully disabled. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1623198/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1625666] [NEW] Error message "Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa restore 0' failed with exit code 99" appears on journalctl
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with alsa-utils 1.1.2-1ubuntu1 and on booting my system I'm seeing sometimes the error message "Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa restore 0' failed with exit code 99" on executing journalctl. ** Affects: alsa-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625666 Title: Error message "Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa restore 0' failed with exit code 99" appears on journalctl Status in alsa-utils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with alsa-utils 1.1.2-1ubuntu1 and on booting my system I'm seeing sometimes the error message "Process '/usr/sbin/alsactl -E HOME=/run/alsa restore 0' failed with exit code 99" on executing journalctl. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-utils/+bug/1625666/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624967] Re: $TERM is not set for /etc/rc.local
But causing some output for example with echo in /etc/rc.local causes it to be written on the console on booting. Or is this the expected behavior even if the journal is used? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624967 Title: $TERM is not set for /etc/rc.local Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd 231-6 and after upgrading from upstart to systemd I'm noticing that a setterm command fails that I have put into /etc/rc.local in the past (to make specific settings on the console without requiring a login). On making a look at this I figured out that $TERM is not set at default anymore and maybe it makes sense to set it at default again. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1624967/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624967] [NEW] $TERM is not set for /etc/rc.local
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd 231-6 and after upgrading from upstart to systemd I'm noticing that a setterm command fails that I have put into /etc/rc.local in the past (to make specific settings on the console without requiring a login). On making a look at this I figured out that $TERM is not set at default anymore and maybe it makes sense to set it at default again. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624967 Title: $TERM is not set for /etc/rc.local Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd 231-6 and after upgrading from upstart to systemd I'm noticing that a setterm command fails that I have put into /etc/rc.local in the past (to make specific settings on the console without requiring a login). On making a look at this I figured out that $TERM is not set at default anymore and maybe it makes sense to set it at default again. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1624967/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624965] [NEW] console respawn is sometimes slow and sometimes fast
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd 231-6 and I'm noticing that login into the console and than logout does show the lines [ OK ] Stopped Getty on tty1. [ OK ] Started Getty on tty1. and the console needs then a few seconds to respawn. But if I login into my desktop (and even if I logout then immediately) all works fine again as the console respawns immediately after a logout. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624965 Title: console respawn is sometimes slow and sometimes fast Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd 231-6 and I'm noticing that login into the console and than logout does show the lines [ OK ] Stopped Getty on tty1. [ OK ] Started Getty on tty1. and the console needs then a few seconds to respawn. But if I login into my desktop (and even if I logout then immediately) all works fine again as the console respawns immediately after a logout. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1624965/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624681] [NEW] "Important" control field is a bit confusing
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev and noticing that the package init seems to be the only one with the "Important" control field which seems to be a bit curious: - On removing a package with apt that has the "Important" field set to "yes" it seems to show the same warning like removing a package that has the "Essential" field set to "yes". Even the same term "essential" is used instead of "important" (maybe this should be changed?). - "man deb-control" does not know this field and removing a package with dpkg that has the "Important" field set to "yes" does not throw an error while removing a package that has the "Essential" field set to "yes" does. - I'm wondering what the difference between the "Essential" and "Important" field for apt is. I can't find any information about it and can't also find the manpage that documents the custom control fields that apt but not dpkg knows (does such a manpage exist?). - I'm also wondering why init uses this control field instead of the "Essential" control field as this would additionally prevent removing it by accident with dpkg. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624681 Title: "Important" control field is a bit confusing Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Status in init-system-helpers package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev and noticing that the package init seems to be the only one with the "Important" control field which seems to be a bit curious: - On removing a package with apt that has the "Important" field set to "yes" it seems to show the same warning like removing a package that has the "Essential" field set to "yes". Even the same term "essential" is used instead of "important" (maybe this should be changed?). - "man deb-control" does not know this field and removing a package with dpkg that has the "Important" field set to "yes" does not throw an error while removing a package that has the "Essential" field set to "yes" does. - I'm wondering what the difference between the "Essential" and "Important" field for apt is. I can't find any information about it and can't also find the manpage that documents the custom control fields that apt but not dpkg knows (does such a manpage exist?). - I'm also wondering why init uses this control field instead of the "Essential" control field as this would additionally prevent removing it by accident with dpkg. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1624681/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1623198] [NEW] Masking and then disabling dbus.service causes the system to freeze
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd-sysv 231-6 and if I'm executing the command "systemctl mask dbus.service" and then "systemctl stop dbus.service" the system does freeze after a few seconds (even switching to the console is not possible anymore). But booting then the system works fine without any freezes while dbus got successfully disabled. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623198 Title: Masking and then disabling dbus.service causes the system to freeze Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with systemd-sysv 231-6 and if I'm executing the command "systemctl mask dbus.service" and then "systemctl stop dbus.service" the system does freeze after a few seconds (even switching to the console is not possible anymore). But booting then the system works fine without any freezes while dbus got successfully disabled. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1623198/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1623194] [NEW] Permanent I/O from kworker since migrated to systemd
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev and after upgrading from upstart to systemd (231-6) I'm noticing that if the system is on idle (even if only booted to the login screen) there are permanent I/O activities on my hard disk drive. On making a look with inotifywait this happens by permanently accessing files in /home/.ecryptfs/sworddragon/.Private (but no I/O appears at the transparent mountpoint at /home/sworddragon). On making a look with iotop the only I/O activities are comming from kworker (and sometimes jbd2) at this time. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623194 Title: Permanent I/O from kworker since migrated to systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev and after upgrading from upstart to systemd (231-6) I'm noticing that if the system is on idle (even if only booted to the login screen) there are permanent I/O activities on my hard disk drive. On making a look with inotifywait this happens by permanently accessing files in /home/.ecryptfs/sworddragon/.Private (but no I/O appears at the transparent mountpoint at /home/sworddragon). On making a look with iotop the only I/O activities are comming from kworker (and sometimes jbd2) at this time. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1623194/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1596327] [NEW] bash does not recache a path if the file gets missing
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubutu 16.10 dev with bash 4.3-15ubuntu1 and I'm noticing that bash caches the path of a command if the current bash instance successfully finds it in the $PATH environment variable. But after this caching happened if the file gets missing but reappears at another location bash claims just that the file is in the old path missing. I think in this case bash should withdraw the related cache entry and search again in the $PATH environment variable. ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596327 Title: bash does not recache a path if the file gets missing Status in bash package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubutu 16.10 dev with bash 4.3-15ubuntu1 and I'm noticing that bash caches the path of a command if the current bash instance successfully finds it in the $PATH environment variable. But after this caching happened if the file gets missing but reappears at another location bash claims just that the file is in the old path missing. I think in this case bash should withdraw the related cache entry and search again in the $PATH environment variable. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1596327/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594971] [NEW] Inconsistent usage of options in similar applications
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that df and du are using the same options for the same actions but df documents "-i, --inodes" while du documents only "--inodes" while no other option uses already -i. Maybe this option can be made consistent in this case (I would not be wondered if there are more such issues especially in other similar applications). ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594971 Title: Inconsistent usage of options in similar applications Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that df and du are using the same options for the same actions but df documents "-i, --inodes" while du documents only "-- inodes" while no other option uses already -i. Maybe this option can be made consistent in this case (I would not be wondered if there are more such issues especially in other similar applications). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1594971/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594968] [NEW] Option to sort the disk usage output by size
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that du has no option to sort the output by size ascending/descending. This could be useful for example to figure out which directories/files are consuming the most space on the disk. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594968 Title: Option to sort the disk usage output by size Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that du has no option to sort the output by size ascending/descending. This could be useful for example to figure out which directories/files are consuming the most space on the disk. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1594968/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594338] Re: Using exec on a non-supported binary format shows "Success"
I also noticed if the binary format is registered but the file has no executable permissions I'm getting 2 times the output "Permission denied": sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ exec '/wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe' bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: Permission denied bash: exec: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: cannot execute: Permission denied -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594338 Title: Using exec on a non-supported binary format shows "Success" Status in bash package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with bash 4.3-14ubuntu2 and on using exec on a non-supported binary format I'm getting the output "Success" while the file couldn't be executed like in this example: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ exec '/wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe' bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: Success To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1594338/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594338] [NEW] Using exec on a non-supported binary format shows "Success"
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with bash 4.3-14ubuntu2 and on using exec on a non-supported binary format I'm getting the output "Success" while the file couldn't be executed like in this example: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ exec '/wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe' bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: Success ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594338 Title: Using exec on a non-supported binary format shows "Success" Status in bash package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with bash 4.3-14ubuntu2 and on using exec on a non-supported binary format I'm getting the output "Success" while the file couldn't be executed like in this example: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ exec '/wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe' bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error bash: /wine/drive_c/Program Files (x86)/Steam/Steam.exe: Success To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1594338/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1594312] [NEW] Enhancing the information about unmet dependencies
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with apt 1.3~exp2ubuntu1 and on installing packages if they have unmet dependencies I'm getting output like this: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install winehq-devel Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: winehq-devel : Depends: wine-devel (= 1.9.12~ubuntu16.04.1) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. This information is not extremely useful and maybe it can be enhanced. For example apt could show more detailed which packages are causing the issue for what reason (for example in this case libidn11 and some *heimdal packages had a multiarch version mismatch). ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594312 Title: Enhancing the information about unmet dependencies Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with apt 1.3~exp2ubuntu1 and on installing packages if they have unmet dependencies I'm getting output like this: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install winehq-devel Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: winehq-devel : Depends: wine-devel (= 1.9.12~ubuntu16.04.1) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. This information is not extremely useful and maybe it can be enhanced. For example apt could show more detailed which packages are causing the issue for what reason (for example in this case libidn11 and some *heimdal packages had a multiarch version mismatch). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1594312/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1416768] Re: Fontconfig error output due to malformed conf file
This ticket ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70258 ) claims that Steam uses its own fontconfig runtime which is too old which causes this errors. Also on executing "fc-cache -v | grep -i err" nothing is shown anymore so could it be that all is fine now with that configuration file and only Steam does cause its own issue here? ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #70258 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70258 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416768 Title: Fontconfig error output due to malformed conf file Status in One Hundred Papercuts: Confirmed Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: Generating new string page texture 121: 256x256, total string texture memory is 393.22 KB Generating new string page texture 122: 128x256, total string texture memory is 2.79 MB Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 70: non-double matrix element Fontconfig error: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 70: non-double matrix element Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf", line 78: saw unknown, expected number Generating new string page texture 136: 2048x256, total string texture memory is 4.88 MB Installing breakpad exception handler for appid(steamwebhelper)/version(20150130171142) Installing breakpad exception handler for appid(steamwebhelper)/version(1422637902) Above output is produced, eg by steam when running a game. The fontconfig error lines can be verified with "fc-cache -v | grep -i err". The offending section is around original lines 70, 78: false 1.0 matrix pixelsizefixupfactor 0 0 pixelsizefixupfactor size pixelsizefixupfactor Note that the element has 2 child elements when it should only have 1. Removal of the second "pixelsizefixupfactor" solves the error. After this removal neither fc-cache nor steam report an "Fontconfig error:". The documentation for fonts.conf, eg http://linux.die.net/man/5/fonts- conf, suggests that the element should hold 4 elements: > > >This element holds the four elements of an affine transformation. But it appears not to produce an error when only 2 elements are present (and does produce an error here when there are 4, for me). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: fontconfig-config 2.11.1-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-29.39-generic 3.16.7-ckt2 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Sun Feb 1 00:46:10 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-02 (820 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.1) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: fontconfig UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to utopic on 2015-01-28 (3 days ago) modified.conffile..etc.fonts.conf.avail.10.scale.bitmap.fonts.conf: [modified] mtime.conffile..etc.fonts.conf.avail.10.scale.bitmap.fonts.conf: 2015-02-01T00:30:44.308962 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1416768/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1585589] Re: drop upstart-sysv
In that case would it not be possibly better to move Upstart from main to universe and keep the optional upstart-sysv dependency in init? This way users can continue to use (and theoretically develop) Upstart while the maintainers of main don't need to maintain Upstart anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585589 Title: drop upstart-sysv Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with init 1.33ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that it does now pre-depend on "systemd-sysv" instead of "systemd-sysv | upstart-sysv". Since init is essential and upstart-sysv conflicts with systemd-sysv this means it is not possible to install Upstart in a sane way anymore. In case Upstart is not supported anymore maybe all related packages should be removed from the yakkety repository then (since Upstart can't be installed anymore with apt for the reasons above) to avoid confusion. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1585589/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1585589] Re: drop upstart-sysv
So Upstart gets completely removed or is it really just the init-part (upstart-sysv) that gets removed so that Upstart continues to work in 16.10+ besides systemd to run legacy jobs? Otherwise I have to migrate a few custom jobs to systemd before Ubuntu 16.10 gets released in october. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585589 Title: drop upstart-sysv Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with init 1.33ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that it does now pre-depend on "systemd-sysv" instead of "systemd-sysv | upstart-sysv". Since init is essential and upstart-sysv conflicts with systemd-sysv this means it is not possible to install Upstart in a sane way anymore. In case Upstart is not supported anymore maybe all related packages should be removed from the yakkety repository then (since Upstart can't be installed anymore with apt for the reasons above) to avoid confusion. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1585589/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1585589] [NEW] init does leave no choice between upstart and systemd anymore
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with init 1.33ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that it does now pre-depend on "systemd-sysv" instead of "systemd-sysv | upstart-sysv". Since init is essential and upstart-sysv conflicts with systemd-sysv this means it is not possible to install Upstart in a sane way anymore. In case Upstart is not supported anymore maybe all related packages should be removed from the yakkety repository then (since Upstart can't be installed anymore with apt for the reasons above) to avoid confusion. ** Affects: init-system-helpers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to init-system-helpers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585589 Title: init does leave no choice between upstart and systemd anymore Status in init-system-helpers package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with init 1.33ubuntu2 and I'm noticing that it does now pre-depend on "systemd-sysv" instead of "systemd-sysv | upstart-sysv". Since init is essential and upstart-sysv conflicts with systemd-sysv this means it is not possible to install Upstart in a sane way anymore. In case Upstart is not supported anymore maybe all related packages should be removed from the yakkety repository then (since Upstart can't be installed anymore with apt for the reasons above) to avoid confusion. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/init-system-helpers/+bug/1585589/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1582015] [NEW] Moving the daily apt timeout after the APT::Periodic::Enable check
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with apt 1.3~exp1 and I'm noticing that /etc/cron.daily/apt-compat does set the random timeout and keeping the related processes that time open before the check for APT::Periodic::Enable is done in /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily. Since the timeout exists to prevent all the users to stress the servers at the same time but an user might have disabled the periodic job with APT::Periodic::Enable I think it would be better if setting the timeout would be moved from /etc/cron.daily/apt-compat to /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily at a suitable place somewhere after the APT::Periodic::Enable check. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582015 Title: Moving the daily apt timeout after the APT::Periodic::Enable check Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with apt 1.3~exp1 and I'm noticing that /etc/cron.daily/apt-compat does set the random timeout and keeping the related processes that time open before the check for APT::Periodic::Enable is done in /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily. Since the timeout exists to prevent all the users to stress the servers at the same time but an user might have disabled the periodic job with APT::Periodic::Enable I think it would be better if setting the timeout would be moved from /etc/cron.daily/apt-compat to /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily at a suitable place somewhere after the APT::Periodic::Enable check. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1582015/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1581985] [NEW] Inconsistent use of brackets in /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with apt 1.3~exp1 and on making a look at /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily I have noticed that in line 293 the opening bracket for the function check_power is used within the same line while other functions use it in the next line. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581985 Title: Inconsistent use of brackets in /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.10 dev with apt 1.3~exp1 and on making a look at /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily I have noticed that in line 293 the opening bracket for the function check_power is used within the same line while other functions use it in the next line. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1581985/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
No, it does now return with 1 too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
Has using -vv any additional effect (because only -v is documented in the strace manpage)? Anyways, in the attachments is the requested output. ** Attachment added: "strace.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+attachment/4644822/+files/strace.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1572220] [NEW] Autocompletion of quoted directories with spaces does cause the / to be out of the quotes
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with bash 4.3-14ubuntu1 and I'm noticing if I'm autocompleting a directory name (by pressing tab) that is quoted (no matter if there is only a beginning quote or already an ending quote) and has spaces in its name the / gets always set behind a closing quote. This is not the case if the directory name has no spaces in its name as the / is then set before the closing quote or no closing quote is set if there is only an opening quote. ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572220 Title: Autocompletion of quoted directories with spaces does cause the / to be out of the quotes Status in bash package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with bash 4.3-14ubuntu1 and I'm noticing if I'm autocompleting a directory name (by pressing tab) that is quoted (no matter if there is only a beginning quote or already an ending quote) and has spaces in its name the / gets always set behind a closing quote. This is not the case if the directory name has no spaces in its name as the / is then set before the closing quote or no closing quote is set if there is only an opening quote. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1572220/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1571849] [NEW] Making the output "total" from ls more self-explanatory
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and for example on executing "ls -al" on an empty directory I'm getting as output in the first line "total 8" with 2 following lines containing the listings for the files "." and "..". Actually I have no idea what "total" stands for as the probably most plausible explanation of being the number of files listed doesn't seem to match. Maybe this line could be reworded to be more self-explanatory. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571849 Title: Making the output "total" from ls more self-explanatory Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and for example on executing "ls -al" on an empty directory I'm getting as output in the first line "total 8" with 2 following lines containing the listings for the files "." and "..". Actually I have no idea what "total" stands for as the probably most plausible explanation of being the number of files listed doesn't seem to match. Maybe this line could be reworded to be more self-explanatory. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1571849/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
And I thought the return code of 0 is another bug and have created another report for it (which got already marked as a duplicate of this bug). Anyways, here is the requested output: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# find /{etc,lib,run}/systemd -name tmp.mount | xargs ls -l find: ‘/run/systemd’: No such file or directory total 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1571370] [NEW] Missing option in the manpage
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with apt 1.2.10ubuntu1 and I'm noticing that in the manpage of apt-get the option --no-install-recommends is documented but not --install-recommends. Possibly this does also apply to similar options like --install-suggests. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571370 Title: Missing option in the manpage Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with apt 1.2.10ubuntu1 and I'm noticing that in the manpage of apt-get the option --no-install-recommends is documented but not --install-recommends. Possibly this does also apply to similar options like --install-suggests. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1571370/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1571363] [NEW] Installing with recommended packages does not query down anymore on already installed dependencies
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with apt 1.2.10ubuntu1 and on installing with recommended packages for example by using the option "--install- recommends" normally apt installs the recommended packages of the specified package and the recommended packages of the dependencies at any level. But at the latter I'm noticing if such a dependency was already installed without installing its recommended packages apt will not query anymore down to the recommended packages of this dependency. This behavior does also break packages that provide only possibly too minimal dependencies and relying more that the user also installs the recommended packages like in this case: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pipelight/+bug/1571098 ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571363 Title: Installing with recommended packages does not query down anymore on already installed dependencies Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with apt 1.2.10ubuntu1 and on installing with recommended packages for example by using the option "--install- recommends" normally apt installs the recommended packages of the specified package and the recommended packages of the dependencies at any level. But at the latter I'm noticing if such a dependency was already installed without installing its recommended packages apt will not query anymore down to the recommended packages of this dependency. This behavior does also break packages that provide only possibly too minimal dependencies and relying more that the user also installs the recommended packages like in this case: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pipelight/+bug/1571098 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1571363/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1570813] [NEW] Executing "systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $?" returns 0 on an error
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-4ubuntu4 and figured out by this report ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707 ) if executing "systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $?" fails 0 is returned as shown in this example: root@ubuntu:~# systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $? Failed to get unit file state for tmp.mount: No such file or directory 0 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570813 Title: Executing "systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $?" returns 0 on an error Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-4ubuntu4 and figured out by this report ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707 ) if executing "systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $?" fails 0 is returned as shown in this example: root@ubuntu:~# systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $? Failed to get unit file state for tmp.mount: No such file or directory 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1570813/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
Here is the requested output: root@ubuntu:~# systemctl is-enabled tmp.mount ; echo $? Failed to get unit file state for tmp.mount: No such file or directory 0 root@ubuntu:~# systemctl status tmp.mount Failed to connect to bus: No such file or directory root@ubuntu:~# ls -l /etc/systemd/system/tmp.mount ls: cannot access '/etc/systemd/system/tmp.mount': No such file or directory Executing "dpkg-reconfigure systemd" does now also not show the error anymore. But if I'm not wrong I remember to had this for a short time in the past too and shortly after this the error appeared again. I think I should wait at least until I upgrade systemd to a new version again and see if this error doesn't appear there anymore too. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569964] Re: Malformed characters on the console with LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 are shown
I have also seen this issue in the past with GRUB and reported it too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1558926 I was not sure if I should have appended nano to this report or create a new one as at the GRUB issue for some special reason a character has been choosen that would not be required. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569964 Title: Malformed characters on the console with LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 are shown Status in nano package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with nano 2.5.3-2 and on going to the console and setting LANG to de_DE.UTF-8 I'm noticing that changing an existing file with nano and aborting the changes with CTRL + X does show before and after the word "Nein" a black square instead of the characters „ and “ as they are shown on a terminal. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/+bug/1569964/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569964] [NEW] Malformed characters on the console with LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 are shown
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with nano 2.5.3-2 and on going to the console and setting LANG to de_DE.UTF-8 I'm noticing that changing an existing file with nano and aborting the changes with CTRL + X does show before and after the word "Nein" a black square instead of the characters „ and “ as they are shown on a terminal. ** Affects: nano (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569964 Title: Malformed characters on the console with LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 are shown Status in nano package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with nano 2.5.3-2 and on going to the console and setting LANG to de_DE.UTF-8 I'm noticing that changing an existing file with nano and aborting the changes with CTRL + X does show before and after the word "Nein" a black square instead of the characters „ and “ as they are shown on a terminal. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nano/+bug/1569964/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569952] [NEW] Comment in multiline stanza breaks the job
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with upstart 1.13.2-0ubuntu21 and if a comment is used at the beginning of a line within a multiline stanza the job breaks. For example executing "initctl reload-configuration" and "dmesg | tail -n 1" shows on the following stanza the error "init: /etc/init/lxdm.conf:12: Expected token": start on ((filesystem and runlevel [!06] # and started dbus and (drm-device-added card0 PRIMARY_DEVICE_FOR_DISPLAY=1 or stopped udev-fallback-graphics)) or runlevel PREVLEVEL=S) ** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569952 Title: Comment in multiline stanza breaks the job Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with upstart 1.13.2-0ubuntu21 and if a comment is used at the beginning of a line within a multiline stanza the job breaks. For example executing "initctl reload-configuration" and "dmesg | tail -n 1" shows on the following stanza the error "init: /etc/init/lxdm.conf:12: Expected token": start on ((filesystem and runlevel [!06] # and started dbus and (drm-device-added card0 PRIMARY_DEVICE_FOR_DISPLAY=1 or stopped udev-fallback-graphics)) or runlevel PREVLEVEL=S) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1569952/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1174391] Re: LightDM doesn't start
On testing this on Ubuntu 16.04 dev with lightdm 1.18.1-0ubuntu1 it does still not start. ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174391 Title: LightDM doesn't start Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with lightdm 1.6.0-0ubuntu2.1 0. On booting my system it will change to console 7 and the screen does go black. But after a few seconds this process stops and I'm seeing just text on console 7. Trying to manually start lightdm will result in the same behavior. If I'm installing GDM all is working fine. In the attachments is my Xorg.0.log. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1174391/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569475] [NEW] Directly upgrading a package shows that the dependencies are getting installed and upgraded if already installed
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.9 and on upgrading a package directly with "apt-get install" apt shows that the dependencies get installed and upgraded if they are already installed while this looks a bit confusing (I think showing that they get upgraded is enough). Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install console-setup Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: console-setup-linux keyboard-configuration The following packages will be upgraded: console-setup console-setup-linux keyboard-configuration 3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 1.759 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569475 Title: Directly upgrading a package shows that the dependencies are getting installed and upgraded if already installed Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.9 and on upgrading a package directly with "apt-get install" apt shows that the dependencies get installed and upgraded if they are already installed while this looks a bit confusing (I think showing that they get upgraded is enough). Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install console-setup Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: console-setup-linux keyboard-configuration The following packages will be upgraded: console-setup console-setup-linux keyboard-configuration 3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. Need to get 1.759 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1569475/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1174391] Re: LightDM doesn't start
In that case setting the status to "Incomplete" would be more appropriate. ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174391 Title: LightDM doesn't start Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with lightdm 1.6.0-0ubuntu2.1 0. On booting my system it will change to console 7 and the screen does go black. But after a few seconds this process stops and I'm seeing just text on console 7. Trying to manually start lightdm will result in the same behavior. If I'm installing GDM all is working fine. In the attachments is my Xorg.0.log. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1174391/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1174391] Re: LightDM doesn't start
What does make you think that this is fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174391 Title: LightDM doesn't start Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 dev with lightdm 1.6.0-0ubuntu2.1 0. On booting my system it will change to console 7 and the screen does go black. But after a few seconds this process stops and I'm seeing just text on console 7. Trying to manually start lightdm will result in the same behavior. If I'm installing GDM all is working fine. In the attachments is my Xorg.0.log. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1174391/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1565183] [NEW] Processing triggers for ca-certificates shows 2 times "done."
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with ca-certificates 20160104ubuntu1 and on installing ca-certificates I got this output on processing the triggers for it (which shows "done." 2 times which is a bit confusing): Processing triggers for ca-certificates (20160104ubuntu1) ... Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs... 0 added, 0 removed; done. Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d... done. done. ** Affects: ca-certificates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ca-certificates in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565183 Title: Processing triggers for ca-certificates shows 2 times "done." Status in ca-certificates package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with ca-certificates 20160104ubuntu1 and on installing ca-certificates I got this output on processing the triggers for it (which shows "done." 2 times which is a bit confusing): Processing triggers for ca-certificates (20160104ubuntu1) ... Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs... 0 added, 0 removed; done. Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d... done. done. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/1565183/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1561477] [NEW] Option to suppress repeated lines with uniq
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and uniq does not provide an option to suppress repeated lines if they are not adjacent. But this could be useful if the input can't be sorted for example on using specific commands with pipes so maybe an option for this could be added. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561477 Title: Option to suppress repeated lines with uniq Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and uniq does not provide an option to suppress repeated lines if they are not adjacent. But this could be useful if the input can't be sorted for example on using specific commands with pipes so maybe an option for this could be added. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1561477/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1465634] Re: $PATH is wrong
On creating a new user I have noticed the same issue. I have then tested if /etc/environment is being read by adding a testvariable to it. Loging in with my account does not load this variable into the environment but loging in with root does. The permissions for this file are 0644 for root:root. Any idea how to debug this issue? ** Package changed: ubuntu => pam (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1465634 Title: $PATH is wrong Status in pam package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev and I'm noticing that I'm getting an unexpected $PATH on a terminal with my user: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ echo $PATH /bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin On the console all is fine and for root on the console and a terminal all is fine too. /etc/environment contains "PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games"" and I couldn't figure out why only my user on a terminal gets the wrong path. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1465634/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1559646] [NEW] Separating languages into more packages
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with libc6 2.23-0ubuntu1 and language-pack- gnome-de 1:16.04+20160313 (and its minimum dependencies) and on executing "locale -a" I'm getting this output: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ locale -a C C.UTF-8 de_AT.utf8 de_BE.utf8 de_CH.utf8 de_DE.utf8 de_LI.utf8 de_LU.utf8 en_US.utf8 POSIX It could be useful if the languages would be split into more packages (like one for any territory for the same language like in my example and a separate package for the english language) so that they can be easily maintained. ** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: language-pack-de (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: language-pack-gnome-de (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: language-pack-gnome-de (Ubuntu) => language-pack-de (Ubuntu) ** Description changed: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with libc6 2.23-0ubuntu1 and language-pack- - gnome-de 1:16.04+20160313 and on executing "locale -a" I'm getting this - output: + gnome-de 1:16.04+20160313 (and its minimum dependencies) and on + executing "locale -a" I'm getting this output: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ locale -a C C.UTF-8 de_AT.utf8 de_BE.utf8 de_CH.utf8 de_DE.utf8 de_LI.utf8 de_LU.utf8 en_US.utf8 POSIX - - It could be useful if the languages would be split into more packages (like one for any territory for the same language like in my example and a separate package for the english language) so that they can be easily maintained. + It could be useful if the languages would be split into more packages + (like one for any territory for the same language like in my example and + a separate package for the english language) so that they can be easily + maintained. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to language-pack-gnome-de in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559646 Title: Separating languages into more packages Status in glibc package in Ubuntu: New Status in language-pack-de package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with libc6 2.23-0ubuntu1 and language-pack- gnome-de 1:16.04+20160313 (and its minimum dependencies) and on executing "locale -a" I'm getting this output: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ locale -a C C.UTF-8 de_AT.utf8 de_BE.utf8 de_CH.utf8 de_DE.utf8 de_LI.utf8 de_LU.utf8 en_US.utf8 POSIX It could be useful if the languages would be split into more packages (like one for any territory for the same language like in my example and a separate package for the english language) so that they can be easily maintained. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1559646/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1174911] Re: pgrep does at default not always match the input of the user against the process name
Edit2: On thinking about this a bit more the difference between using -f or not is the matching against the process name only and matching against the full command line (process name + arguments). Theoretically matching against the process name only could also be done if pgrep would use /proc/_pid_/cmdline instead and just cut its content before the first argument. That would all keep as it is but the character limit would be eliminated. Or is there a special reason why pgrep does get the process name from /proc/_pid_/stat? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174911 Title: pgrep does at default not always match the input of the user against the process name Status in procps package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: When looking for a process with a long process name, pgrep cuts the process name, and so doesn't match an exact search. For example: # launch gnome-calculator: $ gnome-calculator # use 'ps a' to show process table - note the whole process name is present: $ ps a PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1411 tty4 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty4 1417 tty5 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty5 1427 tty2 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty2 1428 tty3 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty3 1436 tty6 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty6 9417 pts/1Sl 0:00 gnome-calculator 9426 pts/1R+ 0:00 ps a (some results cut for clarity) # now try and find it with pgrep: $ pgrep gnome-calculator # no results! however, this works: $ pgrep gnome-calculato ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: procps 1:3.3.3-2ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Apr 30 13:35:02 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-01-17 (469 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: procps UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2012-12-05 (145 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1174911/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1174911] Re: pgrep does not correctly match the input of the user against the process name
Edit: Meh, on looking at the manpage I remembered the argument is a pattern which can make the above very tricky. Alternatively pgrep could really fallback to /proc/_pid_/cmdline on failure or use -f as default. ** Summary changed: - pgrep does not correctly match the input of the user against the process name + pgrep does at default not always match the input of the user against the process name -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174911 Title: pgrep does at default not always match the input of the user against the process name Status in procps package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: When looking for a process with a long process name, pgrep cuts the process name, and so doesn't match an exact search. For example: # launch gnome-calculator: $ gnome-calculator # use 'ps a' to show process table - note the whole process name is present: $ ps a PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1411 tty4 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty4 1417 tty5 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty5 1427 tty2 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty2 1428 tty3 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty3 1436 tty6 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty6 9417 pts/1Sl 0:00 gnome-calculator 9426 pts/1R+ 0:00 ps a (some results cut for clarity) # now try and find it with pgrep: $ pgrep gnome-calculator # no results! however, this works: $ pgrep gnome-calculato ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: procps 1:3.3.3-2ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Apr 30 13:35:02 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-01-17 (469 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: procps UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2012-12-05 (145 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1174911/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1174911] Re: pgrep cuts process names
This is indeed useful information you have found but makes the bug not invalid as this means pgreps matching behavior is defect as demonstrated in the startpost. If pgrep matches against cut process names it should also internally cut the input of the user (or automatically switch to /proc/_pid_/cmdline if pgrep notices that the input of the user is too long and could never return a match). ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New ** Summary changed: - pgrep cuts process names + pgrep does not correctly match the input of the user against the process name -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174911 Title: pgrep does not correctly match the input of the user against the process name Status in procps package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: When looking for a process with a long process name, pgrep cuts the process name, and so doesn't match an exact search. For example: # launch gnome-calculator: $ gnome-calculator # use 'ps a' to show process table - note the whole process name is present: $ ps a PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1411 tty4 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty4 1417 tty5 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty5 1427 tty2 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty2 1428 tty3 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty3 1436 tty6 Ss+0:00 /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty6 9417 pts/1Sl 0:00 gnome-calculator 9426 pts/1R+ 0:00 ps a (some results cut for clarity) # now try and find it with pgrep: $ pgrep gnome-calculator # no results! however, this works: $ pgrep gnome-calculato ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: procps 1:3.3.3-2ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Apr 30 13:35:02 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-01-17 (469 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: procps UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2012-12-05 (145 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1174911/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1471284] Re: System doesn't shutdown anymore
Any idea how to debug this more? It is a bit annoying to always shutdown the PC physically by holding the power button for 5 seconds which causes also often that the fast filesystem check on booting claims about orphan inodes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1471284 Title: System doesn't shutdown anymore Status in upstart package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev and for a few days I'm noticing that my system doesn't fully shutdown anymore. If I'm shutdown the system from the desktop environment (LXDE desktop with LXDM as login manager) the graphical interface exits and it hangs then while showing the console output. The last line in this output is "Unmounting local filesystems...". To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/+bug/1471284/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1465634] Re: $PATH is wrong
This issue appears if I login with LXDM into my LXDE desktop. I'm not sure if this issue comes then from lxdm or lxsession. ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1465634 Title: $PATH is wrong Status in pam package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev and I'm noticing that I'm getting an unexpected $PATH on a terminal with my user: sworddragon@ubuntu:~$ echo $PATH /bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin On the console all is fine and for root on the console and a terminal all is fine too. /etc/environment contains "PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games"" and I couldn't figure out why only my user on a terminal gets the wrong path. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1465634/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1559395] [NEW] Option to clean automatically expired keys
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.7 and on executing "apt-key list" I'm sometimes noticing that there are expired keys. I could removed them manually each but it would be useful if apt-key would provide an additional argument (for example "clean") that does automatically delete these keys. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559395 Title: Option to clean automatically expired keys Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.7 and on executing "apt-key list" I'm sometimes noticing that there are expired keys. I could removed them manually each but it would be useful if apt-key would provide an additional argument (for example "clean") that does automatically delete these keys. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1559395/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1559393] [NEW] Ability to execute cronjobs directly
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with cron 3.0pl1-128ubuntu1 and sometimes I want to execute a specific cronjob directly. In this case it would be helpful if cron would provide the ability to execute a specific cronjob (for example by providing the file and the number of the wanted cronjob). ** Affects: cron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cron in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559393 Title: Ability to execute cronjobs directly Status in cron package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with cron 3.0pl1-128ubuntu1 and sometimes I want to execute a specific cronjob directly. In this case it would be helpful if cron would provide the ability to execute a specific cronjob (for example by providing the file and the number of the wanted cronjob). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/1559393/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547983] Re: apt-get download does not use /var/cache/apt/archives
** Summary changed: - apt-get download does not /var/cache/apt/archives + apt-get download does not use /var/cache/apt/archives -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547983 Title: apt-get download does not use /var/cache/apt/archives Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and I'm noticing that using "apt-get download" does not always use the cache like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get install adwaita-icon-theme-full --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 8089 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 60% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 6033 kB/8089 kB 75%] 422 kB/s 4s^C root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download adwaita-icon-theme-full Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 12% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 1231 kB/8089 kB 15%]^C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547983/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1554056] [NEW] Option to sort the output
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and if I'm executing env the environment variables listed there are unsorted. Maybe env could also provide an option that sorts the output of the environment variables and maybe this could also be the default and instead an option to disable this behavior could be provided. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554056 Title: Option to sort the output Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and if I'm executing env the environment variables listed there are unsorted. Maybe env could also provide an option that sorts the output of the environment variables and maybe this could also be the default and instead an option to disable this behavior could be provided. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1554056/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547996] Re: Wrong download progress is shown
> This is to be expected, as those are two different downloads. This bug is thus effectively a duplicate of the other one. These are 2 single commands so it has nothing to do with it. > Well, actually it's an invalid bug report. We will not reuse partially > downloaded files from the cache for a download command. This issue also appears if the cache is empty. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547996 Title: Wrong download progress is shown Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and as the output of this report ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547983 ) shows the number for the total download progress differs from the download progress of the current package in both commands ("apt-get install" and "apt-get download") while only 1 package is being downloaded and the download progress should be equal for both numbers. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547996/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
I'm still seeing the issue in this version of systemd. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550694] [NEW] Renaming first "Access:" row
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and on using stat on a file I'm noticing that "Access:" is used 2 times. One for the permissions and one for the access time. As this is a bit confusing maybe the first "Access:" can be renamed for example to "Permissions:". ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550694 Title: Renaming first "Access:" row Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with coreutils 8.25-2ubuntu2 and on using stat on a file I'm noticing that "Access:" is used 2 times. One for the permissions and one for the access time. As this is a bit confusing maybe the first "Access:" can be renamed for example to "Permissions:". To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1550694/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547984] Re: Downloading a package with root fails
Also in the last time I'm seeing often on an "apt-get dist-upgrade" this: W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/var/cache/apt/archives/partial/libpython3.5_3.5.1-6ubuntu2_amd64.deb' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) The permissions of the directory are this: root@ubuntu:~# stat /var/cache/apt/archives/partial | grep 'Access: (' Access: (0700/drwx--) Uid: ( 113/_apt) Gid: (0/root) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547984 Title: Downloading a package with root fails Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and on downloading a package with root I'm getting an error message like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download nvidia-settings Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 nvidia-settings amd64 361.28-0ubuntu1 [856 kB] Fetched 856 kB in 0s (1026 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/root/tmp/nvidia-settings_361.28-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) The file gets created for root:root with the permissions 0644 and if I'm trying to download the file with my normal user it works successfully while also getting the same permissions. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547984/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547983] Re: Cache isn't always used
> Do you mean the cache on disk (/var/cache/apt/archives)? On my example it was /var/cache/apt/archives/partial. > If so did you check that the package actually is there on your disk? Yes, it does partly exist after executing and aborting the first command. > I tried to reinstall vim-tiny which was in my cache and saw the following: This bug is about that "apt-get download" does not use the (partly) cache of a previously "apt-get install". "apt-get install" alone does indeed work for me like in your example. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547983 Title: Cache isn't always used Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and I'm noticing that using "apt-get download" does not always use the cache like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get install adwaita-icon-theme-full --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 8089 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 60% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 6033 kB/8089 kB 75%] 422 kB/s 4s^C root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download adwaita-icon-theme-full Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 12% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 1231 kB/8089 kB 15%]^C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547983/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547984] [NEW] Downloading a package with root fails
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and on downloading a package with root I'm getting an error message like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download nvidia-settings Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 nvidia-settings amd64 361.28-0ubuntu1 [856 kB] Fetched 856 kB in 0s (1026 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/root/tmp/nvidia-settings_361.28-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) The file gets created for root:root with the permissions 0644 and if I'm trying to download the file with my normal user it works successfully while also getting the same permissions. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547984 Title: Downloading a package with root fails Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and on downloading a package with root I'm getting an error message like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download nvidia-settings Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 nvidia-settings amd64 361.28-0ubuntu1 [856 kB] Fetched 856 kB in 0s (1026 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/root/tmp/nvidia-settings_361.28-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) The file gets created for root:root with the permissions 0644 and if I'm trying to download the file with my normal user it works successfully while also getting the same permissions. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547984/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1524196] Re: Error on fetching several lists
At the debian bugtracker is also a bugreport about this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807948 It turned out that the user had manually set up /tmp which caused it to have the wrong permissions. I have not manually set up /tmp but on looking at it it has the permissions 0755 for root:root. Setting the permissions to 0777 does solve this issue. Since this installation is a bit old maybe it was just a migration issue. Maybe on installing apt a script should check if the permissions of /tmp are correct? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #807948 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807948 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524196 Title: Error on fetching several lists Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.4 and on executing "apt-get update" I'm seeing several times errors like "Err:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InReleaseCouldn't create tempfiles for splitting up /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_xenial-updates_InRelease Could not execute 'apt-key' to verify signature (is gnupg installed?)" which results that these lists are not available. Downgrading to apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 from Ubuntu 15.10 solves this issue. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1524196/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547996] [NEW] Wrong download progress is shown
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and as the output of this report ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547983 ) shows the number for the total download progress differs from the download progress of the current package in both commands ("apt-get install" and "apt-get download") while only 1 package is being downloaded and the download progress should be equal for both numbers. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547996 Title: Wrong download progress is shown Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and as the output of this report ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547983 ) shows the number for the total download progress differs from the download progress of the current package in both commands ("apt-get install" and "apt-get download") while only 1 package is being downloaded and the download progress should be equal for both numbers. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547996/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1547983] [NEW] Cache isn't always used
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and I'm noticing that using "apt-get download" does not always use the cache like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get install adwaita-icon-theme-full --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 8089 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 60% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 6033 kB/8089 kB 75%] 422 kB/s 4s^C root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download adwaita-icon-theme-full Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 12% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 1231 kB/8089 kB 15%]^C ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547983 Title: Cache isn't always used Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.2.3 and I'm noticing that using "apt-get download" does not always use the cache like this example shows: root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get install adwaita-icon-theme-full --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 8089 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 60% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 6033 kB/8089 kB 75%] 422 kB/s 4s^C root@ubuntu:~/tmp# apt-get download adwaita-icon-theme-full Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 adwaita-icon-theme-full all 3.18.0-2ubuntu3 [8089 kB] 12% [1 adwaita-icon-theme-full 1231 kB/8089 kB 15%]^C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1547983/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
root@ubuntu:~# sed -i '2 s/^/set -x/' /var/lib/dpkg/info/systemd.postinst root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd + set -e + [ configure = triggered ] + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt 214-1 + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt 218-11~ + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt 228-5ubuntu3 + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt 204-9 + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt 204-8 + systemd-machine-id-setup + addgroup --system systemd-journal addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. + adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home /run/systemd --gecos systemd Time Synchronization systemd-timesync + adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home /run/systemd/netif --gecos systemd Network Management systemd-network + adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home /run/systemd/resolve --gecos systemd Resolver systemd-resolve + adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home /run/systemd --gecos systemd Bus Proxy systemd-bus-proxy + _update_catalog + journalctl --update-catalog + setcap cap_dac_override,cap_sys_ptrace=ep /usr/bin/systemd-detect-virt + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 ge 204 + [ -e /run/systemd/was-enabled ] + read UNIT + [ getty@tty1.service = tmp.mount ] + systemctl enable getty@tty1.service + read UNIT + [ remote-fs.target = tmp.mount ] + systemctl enable remote-fs.target + read UNIT + [ tmp.mount = tmp.mount ] + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt-nl 220-6~ + systemctl enable tmp.mount Operation failed: No such file or directory + true + read UNIT + [ systemd-timesyncd.service = tmp.mount ] + systemctl enable systemd-timesyncd.service + read UNIT + [ -n 229-1ubuntu2 ] + _systemctl daemon-reexec + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + _systemctl try-restart systemd-networkd.service + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + _systemctl try-restart systemd-resolved.service + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + _systemctl try-restart systemd-timesyncd.service + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt-nl 228-5~ + _systemctl is-active --quiet resolvconf + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + _systemctl start systemd-networkd-resolvconf-update.path + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + dpkg --compare-versions 229-1ubuntu2 lt 221-1 + [ configure = configure ] + [ -d /run/systemd/system ] + dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/systemctl-bash-completion.sh 204-1~ -- configure 229-1ubuntu2 + dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/systemd-bash-completion.sh 204-1~ -- configure 229-1ubuntu2 + dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile /etc/systemd/systemd-logind.conf /etc/systemd/logind.conf 204-1~ -- configure 229-1ubuntu2 + dpkg-maintscript-helper mv_conffile /etc/systemd/systemd-journald.conf /etc/systemd/journald.conf 204-1~ -- configure 229-1ubuntu2 + dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.machine1.conf 228-5~ -- configure 229-1ubuntu2 + dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/50-systemd-user.sh 228-3~ -- configure 229-1ubuntu2 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
> Ah, so you set RAMTMP=yes in /etc/default/rcS. This file does contain only commented and empty lines on my system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] Re: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
The error message appears after the line "systemctl enable tmp.mount". Manually calling this command does also show the error: root@ubuntu:~# systemctl enable tmp.mount Operation failed: No such file or directory ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545707] [NEW] Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545707 Title: Error message "Operation failed: No such file or directory" on installing/reconfiguring systemd Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with systemd 229-1ubuntu2 and on installing/reconfiguring it I'm getting this output (the first error has already its own bug report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1475094 ): root@ubuntu:~# dpkg-reconfigure systemd addgroup: The group `systemd-journal' already exists as a system group. Exiting. Operation failed: No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1545707/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539125] [NEW] Login into the console does show the wrong number of upgradeable packages
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 and if I'm login into the console a message shows me how many packages are upgradeable. But very often it shows me a number > 0 even if my system if fully upgraded. Trying to logout and login again does still show the same number. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539125 Title: Login into the console does show the wrong number of upgradeable packages Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 and if I'm login into the console a message shows me how many packages are upgradeable. But very often it shows me a number > 0 even if my system if fully upgraded. Trying to logout and login again does still show the same number. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1539125/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1537493] [NEW] 0 is returned if package can't be downloaded
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 and if a package can't be downloaded 0 is returned. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install --reinstall apt Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reinstallation of apt is not possible, it cannot be downloaded. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. root@ubuntu:~# echo $? 0 ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537493 Title: 0 is returned if package can't be downloaded Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 and if a package can't be downloaded 0 is returned. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install --reinstall apt Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reinstallation of apt is not possible, it cannot be downloaded. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. root@ubuntu:~# echo $? 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1537493/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1536965] [NEW] System can freeze on restarting dbus
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with dbus 1.10.6-1ubuntu1 and if the file /etc/dbus-1/session-local.conf gets created and dbus gets restarted most parts of the system does then freeze. The only exception is that the mouse cursor can still be moved and it also changes its symbol if hovering specific elements but the windows doesn't react anymore. ** Affects: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536965 Title: System can freeze on restarting dbus Status in dbus package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with dbus 1.10.6-1ubuntu1 and if the file /etc/dbus-1/session-local.conf gets created and dbus gets restarted most parts of the system does then freeze. The only exception is that the mouse cursor can still be moved and it also changes its symbol if hovering specific elements but the windows doesn't react anymore. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1536965/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1536966] [NEW] Login isn't possible anymore with an empty /etc/dbus-1/session-local.conf
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with dbus 1.10.6-1ubuntu1 and lxdm 0.5.3-1 and if the empty file /etc/dbus-1/session-local.conf gets created and the system gets rebooted all logins with lxdm does then fail. ** Affects: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: lxdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536966 Title: Login isn't possible anymore with an empty /etc/dbus-1/session- local.conf Status in dbus package in Ubuntu: New Status in lxdm package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with dbus 1.10.6-1ubuntu1 and lxdm 0.5.3-1 and if the empty file /etc/dbus-1/session-local.conf gets created and the system gets rebooted all logins with lxdm does then fail. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1536966/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1532944] Re: flashplugin-installer can't correctly install the downloaded package anymore with apt 1.1.x
In that case I have updated the title and the description. ** Description changed: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.10 and on trying to install - flashplugin-installer I'm noticing that the downloaded package can't be - correctly installed anymore. Here is an example output: + flashplugin-installer I'm always getting an error message after the file + got downloaded. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install flashplugin-installer --reinstall Reading package lists... Done - Building dependency tree + Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: - libapt-inst1.7 libapt-pkg4.16 + libapt-inst1.7 libapt-pkg4.16 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/6838 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 99770 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../flashplugin-installer_11.2.202.559ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) over (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for update-notifier-common (3.164) ... flashplugin-installer: downloading http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Get:1 http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz [26.8 MB] - Fetched 26.8 MB in 3min 8s (143 kB/s) + Fetched 26.8 MB in 3min 8s (143 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Installing from local file /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Flash Plugin installed. Setting up flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... ** Summary changed: - flashplugin-installer can't correctly install the downloaded package anymore with apt 1.1.x + flashplugin-installer shows an error message after downloading the package with apt 1.1.x ** Summary changed: - flashplugin-installer shows an error message after downloading the package with apt 1.1.x + flashplugin-installer shows an error message after downloading the file with apt 1.1.x ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532944 Title: flashplugin-installer shows an error message after downloading the file with apt 1.1.x Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Status in flashplugin-nonfree package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.10 and on trying to install flashplugin-installer I'm always getting an error message after the file got downloaded. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install flashplugin-installer --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libapt-inst1.7 libapt-pkg4.16 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/6838 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 99770 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../flashplugin-installer_11.2.202.559ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) over (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for update-notifier-common (3.164) ... flashplugin-installer: downloading http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Get:1 http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz [26.8 MB] Fetched 26.8 MB in 3min 8s (143 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Installing from local file
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522993] Re: Deleting a non-existent key does not result in an error
I'm also noticing that trying to delete multiple keys at once does only delete the first key while I would either expect an error message or that all keys get deleted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522993 Title: Deleting a non-existent key does not result in an error Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.3 and if I'm deleting a key with "apt-key del" which does not exist "OK" is being shown and 0 is returned while I would expect an error message to be shown and another value than 0 being returned. Here is an example how it currently looks: root@ubuntu:~# apt-key del does_not_exist OK root@ubuntu:~# echo $? 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1522993/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1532944] [NEW] flashplugin-installer can't correctly install the downloaded package anymore with apt 1.1.x
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.10 and on trying to install flashplugin-installer I'm noticing that the downloaded package can't be correctly installed anymore. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install flashplugin-installer --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libapt-inst1.7 libapt-pkg4.16 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/6838 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 99770 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../flashplugin-installer_11.2.202.559ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) over (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for update-notifier-common (3.164) ... flashplugin-installer: downloading http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Get:1 http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz [26.8 MB] Fetched 26.8 MB in 3min 8s (143 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Installing from local file /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Flash Plugin installed. Setting up flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532944 Title: flashplugin-installer can't correctly install the downloaded package anymore with apt 1.1.x Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Status in flashplugin-nonfree package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.10 and on trying to install flashplugin-installer I'm noticing that the downloaded package can't be correctly installed anymore. Here is an example output: root@ubuntu:~# apt-get install flashplugin-installer --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libapt-inst1.7 libapt-pkg4.16 Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/6838 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed (Reading database ... 99770 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../flashplugin-installer_11.2.202.559ubuntu1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) over (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... Processing triggers for update-notifier-common (3.164) ... flashplugin-installer: downloading http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Get:1 http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz [26.8 MB] Fetched 26.8 MB in 3min 8s (143 kB/s) W: Can't drop privileges for downloading as file '/var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz' couldn't be accessed by user '_apt'. - pkgAcquire::Run (13: Permission denied) Installing from local file /var/lib/update-notifier/package-data-downloads/partial/adobe-flashplugin_20151228.1.orig.tar.gz Flash Plugin installed. Setting up flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.559ubuntu1) ... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1532944/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help :
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1530368] [NEW] Creating an alternative for x-cursor-theme
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with hicolor-icon-theme 0.15-0ubuntu1 and lxde-icon-theme 0.5.1-1 and a recent change of adwaita-icon-theme has caused it now to install an alternative for it. On my system this is now the only alternative for x-cursor-theme causing it to overwrite some cursor icons in applications where I would expect to see LXDE ones. A solution would be that hicolor-icon-theme and lxde-icon-theme would also install an alternative so that the user can easily change this. ** Affects: hicolor-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: lxde-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: lxde-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to hicolor-icon-theme in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530368 Title: Creating an alternative for x-cursor-theme Status in hicolor-icon-theme package in Ubuntu: New Status in lxde-icon-theme package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with hicolor-icon-theme 0.15-0ubuntu1 and lxde-icon-theme 0.5.1-1 and a recent change of adwaita-icon-theme has caused it now to install an alternative for it. On my system this is now the only alternative for x-cursor-theme causing it to overwrite some cursor icons in applications where I would expect to see LXDE ones. A solution would be that hicolor-icon-theme and lxde-icon-theme would also install an alternative so that the user can easily change this. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hicolor-icon-theme/+bug/1530368/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1524196] [NEW] Error on fetching several lists
Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.4 and on executing "apt-get update" I'm seeing several times errors like "Err:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InReleaseCouldn't create tempfiles for splitting up /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_xenial-updates_InRelease Could not execute 'apt-key' to verify signature (is gnupg installed?)" which results that these lists are not available. Downgrading to apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 from Ubuntu 15.10 solves this issue. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1524196 Title: Error on fetching several lists Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 dev with apt 1.1.4 and on executing "apt-get update" I'm seeing several times errors like "Err:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InReleaseCouldn't create tempfiles for splitting up /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_xenial-updates_InRelease Could not execute 'apt-key' to verify signature (is gnupg installed?)" which results that these lists are not available. Downgrading to apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu1 from Ubuntu 15.10 solves this issue. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1524196/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp