from:"Jesse DuPont"

Re: [Ubnt_users] Burst

2017-06-12 Thread Jesse Dupont

10, 20, 30 Mbps plans (all have 8 Mbps up), all UBNT for RF, typically try to 
stay around 35ish subs for 40Mhz channels and 28ish for 20MHz channels. Haven't 
tested fixed frame, this may allow more scalability. Majority or our customers 
are on 10 Mbps plans.

From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org  on behalf of 
l...@hderlink.com 
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:06:23 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Cc: memb...@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Burst

Hello All,

With the ever-increasing prevalence of streaming video, and the forthcoming 
shift toward 4k content, we're trying to get a handle on where we'll need to go 
with package bandwidth in the next 2-4 years. We're a small, rural, 
Ubiquiti-based WISP. Currently we offer a 5mbps down/1mbps package and a 
2down/1up.

What kind of packages are other Ubiquiti WISPs out there offering who might be 
in similar situations?

How many clients are people getting per Rocket AC 5ghz based AP on a given 
package?

Any feedback on the new Gen 2 AC AP antennae? Perhaps the horn antenna models?

We know there are many variables to take into account, but we're just trying to 
get a feel for what others are doing.

Thanks all!
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

2017-05-24 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Mostly. Some are PTMP-Lite, but most are Prism. I should note on our
6.0.3 M subs, some are XM NanoBridge and some are XW Powerbeam.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 5/24/17 12:44 PM, Tom Fadgen wrote:


  
  are you using 5ac-prism AP's
  
  
  Tom Fadgen 
   
  On Wednesday 24/05/2017 at 11:41 am, Jesse DuPont wrote: 
  
 We are doing quite a bit of 8.0.2 AC AP in mixed mode with
  both 8.0.2 AC subs and 6.0.3 M subs. We are not having random
  disconnect issues and performance has been what we'd expect.
  
  







  Jesse DuPont
  
Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
[ Image ] 
  

  
  On 5/24/17 11:53 AM, Steve Barnes
wrote:
  
  



  No haven’t replaced any AP side yet. 
Still doing AC to AC and Airmax to Airmax.  Waiting for
some of you to workout the bugs and then start 1 tower
at a time.   
   
  
Steve
  Barnes
Wireless
Operations Manager
New
  Lisbon Broadband
NLBC.COM
PCSWIN.COM
765-584-2288
ext:1101
  
   
  

  From: ubnt_users-bounce...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:00 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

  
   
  I have 1000 subs on 6.01 and 100 on
6.04.  I am now starting the upgrade to 6.04 after the
towers I have upgraded have been stable and no issues.
   
  Steve
Barnes
  Wireless
  Operations Manager
  New
Lisbon Broadband
  NLBC.COM
  PCSWIN.COM
  765-584-2288
  ext:1101
   
  From: ubnt_users-bounce...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:38 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
   
  
airos.  i saw your ipv6 comment and
  was looking at release notes on firmware when i
  stopped to read mail so my mind was on airos and just
  responded without thinking.  :-)
  
  
 
  
  
- Original Message
  - 

  Subject:
Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Date: 5/24/17 12:35 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
  
Ipv6
  or Airos v6?

  Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

  
  
 

  On May 24, 2017 12:29 PM,
<ty...@wigi.us>
wrote:
  

  So, now that its been
brought up is anyone having good luck with
any v6 in ptmp?  I've put very lit

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

2017-05-24 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
We are doing quite a bit of 8.0.2 AC AP in mixed mode with both
8.0.2 AC subs and 6.0.3 M subs. We are not having random disconnect
issues and performance has been what we'd expect.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 5/24/17 11:53 AM, Steve Barnes
  wrote:


  
  
  
  
  
No haven’t replaced any AP side yet.  Still
  doing AC to AC and Airmax to Airmax.  Waiting for some of you
  to workout the bugs and then start 1 tower at a time.  
  
 

  Steve
Barnes
  Wireless
  Operations Manager
  New
Lisbon Broadband
  NLBC.COM
  PCSWIN.COM
  765-584-2288
  ext:1101

 

  
From:
  ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Steve Barnes
  Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:00 PM
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group
  <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
  

 
I have 1000 subs on 6.01 and 100 on 6.04. 
  I am now starting the upgrade to 6.04 after the towers I have
  upgraded have been stable and no issues.
 
Steve
  Barnes
Wireless
Operations Manager
New
  Lisbon Broadband
NLBC.COM
PCSWIN.COM
765-584-2288
ext:1101
 
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of ty...@wigi.us
  Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:38 PM
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
 

  airos.  i saw your ipv6 comment and was
looking at release notes on firmware when i stopped to read
mail so my mind was on airos and just responded without
thinking.  :-)


   


  - Original Message - 
  
Subject:
  Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions
  From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
  Date: 5/24/17 12:35 pm
  To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>

  Ipv6 or
Airos v6?
  
Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
  


   
  
On May 24, 2017 12:29 PM, <ty...@wigi.us>
  wrote:

  
So, now that its been brought
  up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in
  ptmp?  I've put very little on v6 yet honestly.
  
  
 
  
  
- Original Message
  - 

  Subject:
Re: [Ubnt_users] test
From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net>
Date: 5/24/17 12:21 pm
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
  

  or
  they're all just done complaining about
  bugs in v6... :p


  
  

  
From:
ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM
To:
Ubiquiti Users Group

[Ubnt_users] AF11x Power Question

2017-05-22 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Hello. Does the AF11X have a bridge rectifier circuit on it's PoE
power input like the AF24 does?

-- 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Type N Jumpers

2017-05-10 Thread Jesse Dupont

So I don't need anything special for 11GHz operation, just regular LMR type 
jumpers?


From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> on behalf of 
David Kunat <m...@davidkunat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:43:23 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Type N Jumpers

Streakwave has N cables

On May 9, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Jesse DuPont 
<jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net<mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>> wrote:

What are people using for Type N Male/Male jumpers for their AF11x deployments 
and where are they at?

Thanks!
--
Jesse DuPont
Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net<mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com<http://facebook.com>/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com<http://facebook.com>/celeritybroadband

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org<mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] AF11x Type N Jumpers

2017-05-09 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
What are people using for Type N Male/Male jumpers for their AF11x
deployments and where are they at?

Thanks!
-- 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

2017-05-08 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Are the lists hosted by ServerPlus? They're having numerous issues
today...


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 5/8/17 2:21 PM, Brian Hesterberg via
  Ubnt_users wrote:


  
People. PAY ATTENTION. At some point you all signed up for
  this. Now it's on YOU to remove yourself. YOU must remove
  yourself. Log in and make the necessary changes.


Sent from my Verizon
  Wireless 4G LTE DROID
  
  On May 8, 2017 3:15 PM, Aram
Ter-Martirosyan <a...@connectto.com> wrote:

  

      Please remove me from
  the list
   
  
Aram Ter-Martirosyan
ConnectTo Communications
http://www.ConnectTo.com
555 Riverdale, Suite A
Glendale, CA 91204
a...@connectto.com
tel 818.546.4601
fax 818.546.4617
  
   
  

  From:
  ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Monarco
  Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:14 PM
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

  
   
  Please remove me as well
  Scott  
  

  From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Christian Hilliard
  Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 1:32 PM
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

  
   
  Please remove me as well..
  
Thank you

  Christian Hilliard
  

  
Founder
  
  
308-698-1444
  


  chris.hilli...@usacommunications.tv


  USACommunications.tv

  

 

  

  On May 8, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Blake Darling <bl...@completecommunicationsinc.com>
wrote:

 

  
Please remove me from this thread/group…..

   


  Thanks, 


   


  Blake 


   


  

  Blake Darling
  President 
  801 647  Office/Cell
  866 566 3827 Fax
  bl...@completecommunicationsinc.com
  www.completecommunications.com
  http://lnked.in/completecommunicationsinc
  Check us out in Enterprise
  Networking Magazine 2016 SDWWAN Top
  10 Companies!
  http://www.enterprisenetworkingmag.com/vendor/article9/completecommunications Digital
  Magazine Link:http://www.enterprisenetworkingmag.com/magazines/May/2016/

  
   
  

  
On May 8, 2017, at 12:10 PM, James
  Wilson <ja...@ridgecomms.com>

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

2017-04-14 Thread Jesse DuPont

I wish there was more transparency in the release notes. I know
they're protecting their intellectual property, but it's difficult
for us to make a decision about a release's improvements and
relevance to our network when the heading of "stability improvement"
clearly involves significant, sometimes numerous, changes to
underlying RF performance and processes.

Jesse DuPont

Network
Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity
Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 4/14/17 10:28 AM, Nick Bright wrote:

On 4/5/2017 1:20 PM, James Craig via
Ubnt_users wrote:

Thanks for the additional reports guys. I have
forwarded to the devs for review.

If experiencing any trouble/reduced performance when
upgrading to 6.0.3, please grab the AP and STA support
file(before reboot/downgrade) and let me know.

ja...@ubnt.com

I tested 6.0.3 on a few sites, and noticed that in a significant
number of cases, there were significant reductions in RX signal at
the client side.

The odd thing is, that rolling back the CLIENT side firmware
improved the RECEIVE signal at the client (e.g. it doesn't seem to
be a TX power problem at the AP).

Tested on a RocketM2 and BulletM2 AP, across various mostly XM
clients, some XW clients. Mostly single phase (airgrids, bullets).

Clients with -60 or so would go to around -65, clients around -65
would go to -72 or so, and clients with a -75 would drop to
-90dBm.

--
---
- Nick Bright-
- Vice President of Technology -
- Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
- Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 -
- Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
---
- Are your files safe?-
- Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup -
- More information & 30 day free trial at -
- http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault -
---

This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system.

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...

2017-03-18 Thread Jesse DuPont

Well, I see on the UBNT downloads page there is a CPU 400 for XM...
I swore I read in a release notes that all XM code was at CPU 400
now. My bad.

Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 3/18/17 8:45 AM, Jesse Dupont wrote:

  And, starting in, I think, 6.0, all XM gear is at 400MHz
CPU now anyway.

  From:
  ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  <ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org> on behalf of Mike Hammett
  <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>
  Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 7:35:22 AM
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...

  If you're not interfering with Verizon LTE with the regular
  firmware, don't worry about it.

-
Mike Hammett

Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP

From: "Dan Wyandt" <d...@trcemail.com>
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group"
<ubnt_users@wispa.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 8:32:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...

  What is the firmware “CPU400” used
on, or more appropriately, how do I know if I need that
over the other XM board firmware?

  -Dan

From:
  Kevin
Lamothe
  Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 10:34 PM
  To: Ubiquiti
Users Group
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...

  Ubiquiti has released 1.3.4 for
ToughSwitch and 6.0.1 for 802.11n gear

  earlier today.

  This bug has been fixed for a few
weeks in the 8.0.1.

  On 3/17/2017 22:21,
mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
  >
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/16/ubiquiti_networking_php_hole/
  > 
  > 
  >
___
  > Ubnt_users mailing list
  > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  >
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Strange ARP issue

2017-03-13 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Is WDS enabled on the AP, but not on the stations (or vice-a-versa)?
I'd make sure WDS is enabled on both the AP and the SMs.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 3/13/17 11:26 AM, Nick Bright wrote:


  Greetings,

I have a BulletM2 unit in AP mode for a small number of client radios. 
This replaced a Mikrotik unit to allow AirMAX to be enabled. The unit is 
running 5.6.9.

With the replacement unit, the SM units aren't ARPing; but they do 
appear in neighbor discovery and pass traffic normally through their PPP 
sessions.

If I set static ARP entry, the units respond. I'm using private 
management IP addresses no the normal VLAN for this, so there's not a 
VLAN related issue.

The adjacent router port is not a member of a switch group or bridge 
group, it's on its' own as a routed port.

Any thoughts as to what might cause this?




  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Odd noise floor problem

2017-03-13 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
This is purely anecdotal, but I have noticed declined performance on
M2 (specifically, Rocket M2s in my case) where noise floor seems
higher, CCQ seems lower and customers report decreased download, but
upload is fine for them ( we offer 8 Mbps upload and they can almost
always get it). All our radios are on 5.6.9 or 6.0, both versions
seem to have this issue. I had been chalking it up to increased
interference because we've not had an A/B comparison like you've
described (replacing the one with the other), but perhaps it's more
than that. I'm getting ready to swap one of the M2s with a Rocket
2AC in mixed mode to see if things are any better.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 3/13/17 11:30 AM, Nick Bright wrote:


  Greetings,

In several locations, I've replaced Mikrotik AP units with BulletM2 
units; to enable AirMAX.

This went quite well early in 2016 and the strategy was successful in 
improving performance at several locations, thanks to enabling TDMA.

We converted several sites in early 2017, and almost all of them have 
been exhibiting symptoms of very poor performance, and awful noise floors.

So for example, we would replace an RB433+XR2 with an BulletM2, using 
the same cables and antenna. The XR2 would be reporting a noise floor in 
the 'normal' range for us (around -95 to -100dBm). Then the replacement 
bullet would suddenly be reporting noise floors of -80dBm to -85dBm! 
Performance suffered along with the severe drop in SNR.

Is this possibly a bad batch of radios or something along those lines? I 
bought them all from the same vendor at the same time.

All units, both AP and SM, are running AirOS 5.6.9.

Thoughts?




  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] Administrative MAC on AirPrism

2017-02-28 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Does anyone know if the WLAN MAC address can be set administratively
on Rocket 5AC Prism radios? We replaced the AP in a recent
acquisition and some SMs had the old AP's MAC locked in their
config.
-- 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

2017-02-27 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Rory,

What is the AirMax Priority set to on your stations having issues on
6.0?


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 2/27/17 6:56 AM, Clay Stewart wrote:


  No issues here, but make sure every client is
upgraded too. Saw improvements, especially in 900Mhz rockets.
  
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Roy <r.engehau...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  

  XW 6.0
seems to be fine.  Clients are on XM 6.0.  

Uptime is 8 days so stability seems to be OK.  Reason
for 8 days was the massive power outage caused tby the
storm in Northern CA.

  

On 2/25/2017 5:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
  

  
  

  

  Anyone else having this
issue?
   
  Rory Conaway •
Triad Wireless • CEO
  4226 S. 37th
Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040
  602-426-0542
  r...@triadwireless.net
  www.triadwireless.net
   
  “Baseball
  - we do not stop playing because we grow old,
  we grow old because we stop playing”
   
    

  
  

  


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  


  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-17 Thread Jesse Dupont

I don't think AirGateways support IPv6, but when we sell an AirRouter to a 
customer, it's is their edge and is generally in SOHO router mode. The WAN 
screenshot I sent is the portion of the config that requests the v6 prefix and 
the LAN screenshot is the portion that adds that prefix to the LAN of the 
router and enables autoconfiguration.

It's worth noting that on my tower routers, both SLAAC and DHCP-PD are enabled 
towards customers (this is true for both PPPoE and IPoE). Many consumer routers 
(although not all) will not actually route v6 from LAN to WAN (and back) unless 
they have a global address on their WAN port (in a different prefix than the 
LAN prefix). While a global v6 address is not technically required to route v6 
(for most consumer router v6 route tables, gateways are almost always 
link-local addresses, not global addresses), if the router is doing v6 DNS 
proxy (actually using resolving DNS over v6), it needs its own global v6 
address to do so.



On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:57 PM -0700, "Shawn C. Peppers" 
<videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:










Jesse,
I am assuming your airgateways are in bridge mode correct?  How are you 
handling /64 PD on LAN side of a customers router?  

Shawn C. PeppersVideo Direct Satellite & Entertainment866-680-8433 Toll 
Free480-287-9960 Faxhttp://www.video-direct.tv
On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Jesse DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> 
wrote:


  

  
  
I've not tried using v6 on a v8.0 AC device. Honestly, we do it all
the time in AirRouters, but have only done it as needed on the radio
and those have been AirOS XM/XW, not AC. We generally try to have
the radios bridged, letting the customer's router do the L3. When we
provide the router, it's generally an AirRouter and it does the v6
as I've described (so do XM/XW radios configured as routers).




  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
      
      


Jesse DuPont

  

Network
  Architect

  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net

  Celerity Networks LLC
  

Celerity
  Broadband LLC

Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  

Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

  

  

On 1/16/17 11:45 AM, Shawn C. Peppers
  wrote:



  
  Are you even using the v6 features of the radio...from what i
can tell its just for management purposes.  Also have u tested
this setup from behind a v8.0 AC device?



Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv
  
  

On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Jesse DuPont 
<jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
wrote:



  
  

  
  We do this every day using AirRouters and XM/XW CPEs. They're
  in router mode, PPPoE, getting v6 via PD and auto-configuring
  the LAN side.

  

  Screen shots attached.

  

  











    
    
  

Jesse DuPont
  


Network Architect

email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net

Celerity Networks LLC


Celerity Broadband LLC

  Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc


Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband


  

  
  On 1/16/17 11:15 AM, Shawn C.
Peppers wrote:

  
  
Has anyone successfully gotten ipv6 PD to work on ubnt devices 
running pppoe and configured in router mode?

Also does ubnt not plan on putting any v6 features in the v8.0? 

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  


  
  

  
  

  
  
___

  Ubnt_users mailing list

  Ubnt_users@wispa.org

  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


  
  

  
  

  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users





___

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
The distance is also channel width dependent.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 1/16/17 11:58 AM, alex phillips
  wrote:


  in PtP or PtMP?
  

  

  

  

  
Alex Phillips
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
  WISPA.org Board of
Directors  (2011-2017)
  WISPA
  President (2015-2017)
  540-908-3993
  

  

  

  

  


On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Shawn
  C. Peppers <videodirectwispal...@gmail.com>
  wrote:
  

  I have one working at 16 miles without any problem.  

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433
  Toll Free
480-287-9960
  Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv
  
  

  
On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:54 PM, alex phillips <highspeedl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

  
  

  you need to watch out for
distance.  Rocket AC's have a hard limit of I
think 14.1 miles.  That may be ok for you but
just something to consider.




  
  

  

  

  

  
Alex
Phillips
CEO and General Manager
RBNS.net
HighSpeedLink.net
  WISPA.org Board of
Directors  (2011-2017)
  WISPA
  President (2015-2017)
  540-908-3993
  

  

  

  

  


On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at
  12:20 PM, Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com>
  wrote:
  Yes Install the
5AC Prisim and make sure it is on the 8.0
FW.  All CPE must be on 6.0 FW prior and it
will work.

Steve Barnes
Wireless Operations Manager
New Lisbon Broadband
NLBC.COM
PCSWIN.COM
765-584-2288
  ext:1101
  

  
-Original Message-
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Ethan E. Dee
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 12:07 PM
To: Ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_use

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont

I've not tried using v6 on a v8.0 AC device. Honestly, we do it all
the time in AirRouters, but have only done it as needed on the radio
and those have been AirOS XM/XW, not AC. We generally try to have
the radios bridged, letting the customer's router do the L3. When we
provide the router, it's generally an AirRouter and it does the v6
as I've described (so do XM/XW radios configured as routers).

Jesse DuPont

Network
Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity
Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 1/16/17 11:45 AM, Shawn C. Peppers
wrote:

Are you even using the v6 features of the radio...from what i
can tell its just for management purposes. Also have u tested
this setup from behind a v8.0 AC device?

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv

On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Jesse DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
wrote:

We do this every day using AirRouters and XM/XW CPEs. They're
in router mode, PPPoE, getting v6 via PD and auto-configuring
the LAN side.

Screen shots attached.

Jesse DuPont

Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 1/16/17 11:15 AM, Shawn C.
Peppers wrote:

Has anyone successfully gotten ipv6 PD to work on ubnt devices running pppoe and configured in router mode?

Also does ubnt not plan on putting any v6 features in the v8.0?

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont

No, I'm using it to provide customers a v6 prefix. In Bridge mode,
you can enable IPv6, but there is no DHCP-PD option, just static or
SLAAC - this would be for management-only. In router or SOHO router
mode, the WAN does DHCP-PD and the puts that on the LAN for
autoconfiguration.

Jesse DuPont

Network
Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity
Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 1/16/17 11:45 AM, Shawn C. Peppers
wrote:

Are you even using the v6 features of the radio...from what i
can tell its just for management purposes. Also have u tested
this setup from behind a v8.0 AC device?

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv

On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Jesse DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
wrote:

We do this every day using AirRouters and XM/XW CPEs. They're
in router mode, PPPoE, getting v6 via PD and auto-configuring
the LAN side.

Screen shots attached.

Jesse DuPont

Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 1/16/17 11:15 AM, Shawn C.
Peppers wrote:

Has anyone successfully gotten ipv6 PD to work on ubnt devices running pppoe and configured in router mode?

Also does ubnt not plan on putting any v6 features in the v8.0?

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

2017-01-16 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
I'm sending a /64 today. I've not tried a /56 or /48 PD, but
presumably AirOS will either take a /64 from the larger prefix and
put it on the LAN or put the whole /56 or /48 prefix on the LAN.
Either way, AirOS isn't going to do DHCP-PD on the LAN, but you
could do it manually. Clearly, this functionality resides squarely
in the customer's router. If I sent a /48 to it, I'll have a v6
route to the /48 via the PPPoE iface and fictitious link-local fe80
address. The /48 can be subnetted as needed internal to the LAN, I
won't care as the provider.

FWIW, I'm well aware of the recommendation of giving /56 or even /48
to all subscribers. I also know of no consumer router that can use
anything other than a /64 for it's LAN side so I've left it alone.
Switching from /64s to /56s or /48s to subscribers is an easy
conversion and when the day comes that someone asks for a static v6
prefix, I'll give them a /48 or more if they want it.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 1/16/17 11:31 AM, Mike Hammett
  wrote:


  
  So now how does this work with multiple
subnets, prefixes, etc.? If I had an internal router that
further sub-delegated prefixes, would I change that /64 to a
/56? What size of prefix is sent down to the CPE from your
router?


  
  -
  Mike Hammett
  
  Intelligent
Computing Solutions
  
  
  Midwest
Internet Exchange
  
  
  The Brothers WISP
  


From: "Jesse
  DuPont" <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
  To: "Ubiquiti Users Group"
  <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
  Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 12:25:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT
  
  We do this every day using AirRouters and XM/XW CPEs. They're
  in router mode, PPPoE, getting v6 via PD and auto-configuring
  the LAN side.
  
  Screen shots attached.
  
  

    
  Jesse DuPont
  
Network
Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity
Broadband LLC
  Like
us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

  

  
  On 1/16/17 11:15 AM, Shawn C.
Peppers wrote:
  
  
Has anyone successfully gotten ipv6 PD to work on ubnt devices running pppoe and configured in router mode?

Also does ubnt not plan on putting any v6 features in the v8.0? 

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
866-680-8433 Toll Free
480-287-9960 Fax
http://www.video-direct.tv
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Powerbeam M5s unable to update firmware

2016-11-15 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Have you tried doing the TFTP recovery mode with the updated
firwmare?


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 11/15/16 10:55 AM, Chris Fabien
  wrote:


  The last one that failed was on XW5.5.6 and we
tried to upgrade to XW5.6.3 and XW5.6.9. I think some of the
others had come in with XW5.6.2. on them. 




  
  
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Ethan
  E. Dee <e...@globalvision.net>
  wrote:
  

  What version are you on?
What versions have you tried upgrading too?
   
On
  11/15/2016 12:27 PM, Chris Fabien wrote:

  
  
  We are seeing a lot of failures on new
powerbeams that we are unable to update the
firmware. The will appear to take the update but
after rebooting they are still on the original
firmware. We have RMA'd some and have another 2 or 3
in the office. That 5 out of maybe 20 new radios.
Anyone seeing this? 




  
  
  
  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




  


___

Ubnt_users mailing list

Ubnt_users@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users







___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirControl2 and devices randomly going "offline"

2016-11-09 Thread Jesse Dupont

Did you used to have an air control server on a different IP that managed the 
devices going down? If they weren't properly unmanaged from the old one, 
they're still trying to talk to it and behavior will manifest itself as you've 
described.






On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:44 PM -0700, "Charles Sprickman" 
 wrote:










Hi all,

I’ve not had much luck on the forums, so I thought I’d see if anyone here has 
some tips on how to track this down.

Lots of info in this thread:

http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airControl-v2-Beta/Debugging-devices-going-quot-offline-quot/m-p/1717755/highlight/false#M13316

I can find no commonality in the devices that fall off:

- I see 5.6.x, 6.x, and 8.x versions getting false downs
- I see APs, CPE, ac, n units getting false downs
- When checking if the units are reachable, I run my tests from the host 
running AC2 to eliminate any routing weirdness
- The devices always reconnect immediately when I manually ask AC2 to reconnect 
the device

What should be noted, is that AC2 (and all our other stuff) is running on AWS 
instances.  I tunnel the traffic back to each PoP with a VPN from AWS to each 
tower.  The RTT on that link is usually about 50ms.  For now, I’d settle on 
some recommendations to make the check a little less aggressive in case I’m 
just measuring blips between AWS and Fairpoint.

Thanks,

Charles

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users





___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 500 AC UNI Codes

2016-10-03 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
What version is on them out of the box?


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 10/3/16 10:52 AM, heith wrote:


  
  
  
  
I recently received a package of Power Beam
  AC 500 radios. I am having issues getting it to a firmware
  level where I could get to activate the radio to enter my UNI
  Codes. I have loaded older beta and non beta firmware, as well
  as the latest. I recall having issues with power beam 400 AC
  radios with the same thing, and having to roll the firmware
  back to a certain level, then activating, then upgrading
  firmware. I have been installing PB 620 AC radios left and
  right with no issue activating them to UNI codes. I didn’t get
  much help from UBNT support. My distributor believes they are
  compliant. Any help would be appreciated
 
Thanks
Heith
Celerity Broadband
  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

2016-10-02 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
No, not turn it upside down, it's still cable exit side down, just
the u-bolt is flipped the other side (inside) of the L-bracket. It
gains a couple of inches of offset, but not nearly as good as the
NanoBridges were.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 10/2/16 5:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:


  Eth port collects water
  Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
  
On Oct 2, 2016 6:39 PM, "Jesse DuPont"
  <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
  wrote:
  
 You CAN flip them so
  long as you don't need 2 things:
  
  1) to do much in the way of down tilt (up tilt is fine);
  2) need to view the tilt tick marks.
  
  It does work the other way...
  
  

      Jesse DuPont
  
Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

  

  
  On
10/2/16 5:44 AM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
  
  
Nope not first time, but first time publicly expressing my extreme
disappointment in the engineering design of the mount. I did express my
displeasure on the dim led lights when they first arrived on the scene.

( Now really I cuss each time I go do an install with these and don't want
to backtrack in models )

Now it looks like an opportunity for an adapter to be made for these
doesn't it.hint  hint  hint

Oh yea and while I'm at it.bring back mFi !!!

On Sat, October 1, 2016 9:54 pm, Matt Hoppes wrote:


  Is this your first time ordering power beams?  I said this the day I got
one to test.

We keep a supply of NanoBridges around for when we need to flip.



  
On Oct 1, 2016, at 21:44, Stuart Pierce <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:


Seriously, I do like the new ethernet door, but what is up with not
being able to flip the mount !?!?!?!

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  
  
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users




  


___

Ubnt_users mailing list

Ubnt_users@wispa.org

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users






___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

2016-10-02 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
You CAN flip them so long as you don't need 2 things:

1) to do much in the way of down tilt (up tilt is fine);
2) need to view the tilt tick marks.

It does work the other way...


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 10/2/16 5:44 AM, Stuart Pierce
  wrote:


  Nope not first time, but first time publicly expressing my extreme
disappointment in the engineering design of the mount. I did express my
displeasure on the dim led lights when they first arrived on the scene.

( Now really I cuss each time I go do an install with these and don't want
to backtrack in models )

Now it looks like an opportunity for an adapter to be made for these
doesn't it.hint  hint  hint

Oh yea and while I'm at it.bring back mFi !!!

On Sat, October 1, 2016 9:54 pm, Matt Hoppes wrote:

  
Is this your first time ordering power beams?  I said this the day I got
one to test.

We keep a supply of NanoBridges around for when we need to flip.




  On Oct 1, 2016, at 21:44, Stuart Pierce <spie...@avolve.net> wrote:


Seriously, I do like the new ethernet door, but what is up with not
being able to flip the mount !?!?!?!

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  
  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

2016-07-30 Thread jesse . dupont



Glad to help!


Get Outlook for Android






On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 11:47 PM -0600, <nath...@sswireless.net> wrote:











Jesse,

Thank you for the second look.  That solved my issue.  I overlooked that 
probably 20 times as i was trying to understand what was wrong.  I have now 
looked at 4 more routers and all their links and as is the case with this one, 
1.7 apparently ignores the md5 authentication.  I will be disabling this 
throughout my network prior to upgrading.  This created a fair amount of 
frustration for me.  

- Original Message -
 From: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net [mailto:jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net]
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
 Sent: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:37:33 + (UTC)
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops 
working




Said differently, even though .13 is configured for it, the hello packet 
doesn't appear to be reflecting that config.


Get Outlook for Android




On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:27 PM -0600, "Nathan Babcock" 
<nath...@sswireless.net> wrote:
 





13 adn 14 are set to MD5.  Just reverified this.


On 7/30/2016 10:20 PM, Jesse Dupont wrote:

It looks like there is an Authentication Type mismatch. .13 is set to none 
whereas .14 is set to MD5.


On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:49 PM, <nath...@sswireless.net> wrote:




Good evening.  


 


We had this happen when we reloaded a router at an active site after a dhcp 
issue, and we are in the process of bring up a new site and figured we would 
try it on a fresh router without any risk of bringing a customer down.  


 


We loaded the router with 1.7, as this is the production firmware we are 
running across all routers in our network presently.  Completed config, ospf is 
working everything is behaving as expected.  Backup config and then loaded 
1.8.5.  As soon as router reboots, it is no longer accessible.  From the next 
router in line, i can ping public interface of new router, but cannot do 
anything else(This most likely due to firewall rules we have in place).  Router 
is online, but ospf is no longer working.  It is no longer listed as a 
registered neighbor and in fact appears that ospf is turned off as a whole.  


 


Last time we did this on the production router, it was available locally but 
ospf did not work.  It appears this is the case here as well.  Any help would 
be greatly appreciated as we need to upgrade our entire infrastructure to take 
advantage of the MPLS configurations for an upcoming project for a customer.  
Thank you in advance!
 


So to further this, i am working at the site and trying to resolve this, so far 
to no end.


 


Here is th ospf database:


OSPF Router with ID (199.83.117.14) (Process ID 0 VRF default)
 Router Link States (Area 0.0.0.0)


Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Link count
 199.83.117.14 199.83.117.14 378 0x8005 0xbcad 3


 


 


show ip ospf interface eth1
 eth1 is up, line protocol is up
 Internet Address 199.83.117.14/30, Area 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500
 Process ID 0, VRF (default), Router ID 199.83.117.14, Network Type BROADCAST, 
Cost: 10
 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1, TE Metric 10
 Designated Router (ID) 199.83.117.14, Interface Address 199.83.117.14
 No backup designated router on this network
 Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
 Hello due in 00:00:05
 Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0
 Crypt Sequence Number is 185
 Hello received 0 sent 97, DD received 0 sent 0
 LS-Req received 0 sent 0, LS-Upd received 0 sent 0
 LS-Ack received 0 sent 0, Discarded 0
 Message-digest authentication, using default key-id 0


 


 


set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 area-type normal
 set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 authentication md5
 set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.12/30
 set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 172.16.106.0/24
 set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.128/25
 set protocols ospf parameters abr-type cisco
 set protocols ospf parameters router-id 199.83.117.14


 


packet capture of ospf on the eth1 interface:


16:28:25.895751 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 46663, offset 0, flags [none], proto 
OSPF (89), length 64)
 199.83.117.13 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
 Router-ID 74.116.132.65, Backbone Area, Authentication Type: none (0)
 Options [External]
 Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252, Priority 1
 Designated Router 199.83.117.13
 16:28:31.569879 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 9546, offset 0, flags [DF], proto OSPF 
(89), length 80)
 199.83.117.14 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
 Router-ID 199.83.117.129, Backbone Area, Authentication Type: MD5 (2)
 Key-ID: 0, Auth-Length: 16, Crypto Sequence Number: 0x053a
 Options [External]
 Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252, Priority 1
 Designated Router 199.83.117.14


 


No idea why this isnt working.


 


Also checked ps aux and it shows:


root 2126 0.0 0.1 6932 2872 ? Ss

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

2016-07-30 Thread jesse . dupont



Said differently, even though .13 is configured for it, the hello packet 
doesn't appear to be reflecting that config.


Get Outlook for Android






On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:27 PM -0600, "Nathan Babcock" 
<nath...@sswireless.net> wrote:











  

  
  


13 adn 14 are set to MD5.  Just reverified this.




On 7/30/2016 10:20 PM, Jesse Dupont
  wrote:



  It looks like there is an Authentication Type
mismatch. .13 is set to none whereas .14 is set to MD5.
  

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:49 PM, <nath...@sswireless.net>
  wrote:

  


Good evening.  


 


We had this happen when we reloaded a router at an active
  site after a dhcp issue, and we are in the process of
  bring up a new site and figured we would try it on a fresh
  router without any risk of bringing a customer down.  


 


We loaded the router with 1.7, as this is the production
  firmware we are running across all routers in our network
  presently.  Completed config, ospf is working everything
  is behaving as expected.  Backup config and then loaded
  1.8.5.  As soon as router reboots, it is no longer
  accessible.  From the next router in line, i can ping
  public interface of new router, but cannot do anything
  else(This most likely due to firewall rules we have in
  place).  Router is online, but ospf is no longer working. 
  It is no longer listed as a registered neighbor and in
  fact appears that ospf is turned off as a whole.  


 


Last time we did this on the production router, it was
  available locally but ospf did not work.  It appears this
  is the case here as well.  Any help would be greatly
  appreciated as we need to upgrade our entire
  infrastructure to take advantage of the MPLS
  configurations for an upcoming project for a customer. 
  Thank you in advance!

  




So to further this, i am working at the site and trying
  to resolve this, so far to no end.


 


Here is th ospf database:


OSPF Router with ID (199.83.117.14) (Process ID 0 VRF
  default)

  Router Link States (Area 0.0.0.0)


Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Link count

  199.83.117.14 199.83.117.14 378 0x8005 0xbcad 3


 


 


show ip ospf interface eth1

  eth1 is up, line protocol is up

  Internet Address 199.83.117.14/30,
  Area 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500

  Process ID 0, VRF (default), Router ID 199.83.117.14,
  Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 10

  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1, TE Metric
  10

  Designated Router (ID) 199.83.117.14, Interface Address
  199.83.117.14

  No backup designated router on this network

  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
  Retransmit 5

  Hello due in 00:00:05

  Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0

  Crypt Sequence Number is 185

  Hello received 0 sent 97, DD received 0 sent 0

  LS-Req received 0 sent 0, LS-Upd received 0 sent 0

  LS-Ack received 0 sent 0, Discarded 0

  Message-digest authentication, using default key-id 0


 


 


set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 area-type normal

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 authentication md5

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.12/30

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 172.16.106.0/24

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.128/25

  set protocols ospf parameters abr-type cisco

  set protocols ospf parameters router-id 199.83.117.14


 


packet capture of ospf on the eth1 interface:


16:28:25.895751 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 46663, offset 0,
  flags [none], proto OSPF (89), length 64)

  199.83.117.13 > 224.0.0.5:
  OSPFv2, Hello, length 44

  Router-ID 74.116.132.65, Backbone Area, Authentication
  Type: none (0)

  Options [External]

  Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252,
  Priority 1

  Designated Router 199.83.117.13

  16:28:31.569879 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 9546, offset 0,
  flags [DF], proto OSPF (89), length 80)

  199.83.117.14 > 224.0.0.5:

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

2016-07-30 Thread jesse . dupont



Well, in the packet details you provided, one if them says that auth type is 
none so that's what made we say that. Maybe the upgrade wipes the key and need 
to remove that part of the config and put it in again?


Get Outlook for Android






On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:27 PM -0600, "Nathan Babcock" 
<nath...@sswireless.net> wrote:











  

  
  


13 adn 14 are set to MD5.  Just reverified this.




On 7/30/2016 10:20 PM, Jesse Dupont
  wrote:



  It looks like there is an Authentication Type
mismatch. .13 is set to none whereas .14 is set to MD5.
  

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:49 PM, <nath...@sswireless.net>
  wrote:

  


Good evening.  


 


We had this happen when we reloaded a router at an active
  site after a dhcp issue, and we are in the process of
  bring up a new site and figured we would try it on a fresh
  router without any risk of bringing a customer down.  


 


We loaded the router with 1.7, as this is the production
  firmware we are running across all routers in our network
  presently.  Completed config, ospf is working everything
  is behaving as expected.  Backup config and then loaded
  1.8.5.  As soon as router reboots, it is no longer
  accessible.  From the next router in line, i can ping
  public interface of new router, but cannot do anything
  else(This most likely due to firewall rules we have in
  place).  Router is online, but ospf is no longer working. 
  It is no longer listed as a registered neighbor and in
  fact appears that ospf is turned off as a whole.  


 


Last time we did this on the production router, it was
  available locally but ospf did not work.  It appears this
  is the case here as well.  Any help would be greatly
  appreciated as we need to upgrade our entire
  infrastructure to take advantage of the MPLS
  configurations for an upcoming project for a customer. 
  Thank you in advance!

  




So to further this, i am working at the site and trying
  to resolve this, so far to no end.


 


Here is th ospf database:


OSPF Router with ID (199.83.117.14) (Process ID 0 VRF
  default)

  Router Link States (Area 0.0.0.0)


Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Link count

  199.83.117.14 199.83.117.14 378 0x8005 0xbcad 3


 


 


show ip ospf interface eth1

  eth1 is up, line protocol is up

  Internet Address 199.83.117.14/30,
  Area 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500

  Process ID 0, VRF (default), Router ID 199.83.117.14,
  Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 10

  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1, TE Metric
  10

  Designated Router (ID) 199.83.117.14, Interface Address
  199.83.117.14

  No backup designated router on this network

  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
  Retransmit 5

  Hello due in 00:00:05

  Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0

  Crypt Sequence Number is 185

  Hello received 0 sent 97, DD received 0 sent 0

  LS-Req received 0 sent 0, LS-Upd received 0 sent 0

  LS-Ack received 0 sent 0, Discarded 0

  Message-digest authentication, using default key-id 0


 


 


set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 area-type normal

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 authentication md5

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.12/30

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 172.16.106.0/24

  set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.128/25

  set protocols ospf parameters abr-type cisco

  set protocols ospf parameters router-id 199.83.117.14


 


packet capture of ospf on the eth1 interface:


16:28:25.895751 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 46663, offset 0,
  flags [none], proto OSPF (89), length 64)

  199.83.117.13 > 224.0.0.5:
  OSPFv2, Hello, length 44

  Router-ID 74.116.132.65, Backbone Area, Authentication
  Type: none (0)

  Options [External]

  Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252,
  Priority 1

  Designated Router 199.83.117.13

  16:28:31.569879 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 9546, offset 0,
  flags [DF], p

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

2016-07-30 Thread Jesse Dupont

It looks like there is an Authentication Type mismatch. .13 is set to none
whereas .14 is set to MD5.

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:49 PM, <nath...@sswireless.net> wrote:

> Good evening.
>
>
>
> We had this happen when we reloaded a router at an active site after a
> dhcp issue, and we are in the process of bring up a new site and figured we
> would try it on a fresh router without any risk of bringing a customer
> down.
>
>
>
> We loaded the router with 1.7, as this is the production firmware we are
> running across all routers in our network presently.  Completed config,
> ospf is working everything is behaving as expected.  Backup config and then
> loaded 1.8.5.  As soon as router reboots, it is no longer accessible.  From
> the next router in line, i can ping public interface of new router, but
> cannot do anything else(This most likely due to firewall rules we have in
> place).  Router is online, but ospf is no longer working.  It is no longer
> listed as a registered neighbor and in fact appears that ospf is turned off
> as a whole.
>
>
>
> Last time we did this on the production router, it was available locally
> but ospf did not work.  It appears this is the case here as well.  Any help
> would be greatly appreciated as we need to upgrade our entire
> infrastructure to take advantage of the MPLS configurations for an upcoming
> project for a customer.  Thank you in advance!
>
> So to further this, i am working at the site and trying to resolve this,
> so far to no end.
>
>
>
> Here is th ospf database:
>
> OSPF Router with ID (199.83.117.14) (Process ID 0 VRF default)
> Router Link States (Area 0.0.0.0)
>
> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# CkSum Link count
> 199.83.117.14 199.83.117.14 378 0x8005 0xbcad 3
>
>
>
>
>
> show ip ospf interface eth1
> eth1 is up, line protocol is up
> Internet Address 199.83.117.14/30, Area 0.0.0.0, MTU 1500
> Process ID 0, VRF (default), Router ID 199.83.117.14, Network Type
> BROADCAST, Cost: 10
> Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1, TE Metric 10
> Designated Router (ID) 199.83.117.14, Interface Address 199.83.117.14
> No backup designated router on this network
> Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
> Hello due in 00:00:05
> Neighbor Count is 0, Adjacent neighbor count is 0
> Crypt Sequence Number is 185
> Hello received 0 sent 97, DD received 0 sent 0
> LS-Req received 0 sent 0, LS-Upd received 0 sent 0
> LS-Ack received 0 sent 0, Discarded 0
> Message-digest authentication, using default key-id 0
>
>
>
>
>
> set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 area-type normal
> set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 authentication md5
> set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.12/30
> set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 172.16.106.0/24
> set protocols ospf area 0.0.0.0 network 199.83.117.128/25
> set protocols ospf parameters abr-type cisco
> set protocols ospf parameters router-id 199.83.117.14
>
>
>
> packet capture of ospf on the eth1 interface:
>
> 16:28:25.895751 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 46663, offset 0, flags [none],
> proto OSPF (89), length 64)
> 199.83.117.13 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
> Router-ID 74.116.132.65, Backbone Area, Authentication Type: none (0)
> Options [External]
> Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252, Priority 1
> Designated Router 199.83.117.13
> 16:28:31.569879 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 9546, offset 0, flags [DF], proto
> OSPF (89), length 80)
> 199.83.117.14 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length 44
> Router-ID 199.83.117.129, Backbone Area, Authentication Type: MD5 (2)
> Key-ID: 0, Auth-Length: 16, Crypto Sequence Number: 0x053a
> Options [External]
> Hello Timer 10s, Dead Timer 40s, Mask 255.255.255.252, Priority 1
> Designated Router 199.83.117.14
>
>
>
> No idea why this isnt working.
>
>
>
> Also checked ps aux and it shows:
>
> root 2126 0.0 0.1 6932 2872 ? Ss 16:02 0:00 /usr/sbin/ospfd -d -P 0
>
>
>
> This thing is just dead in the water...
>
> Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you.
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

*Jesse DuPont*

Owner / Network Architect

email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net

cell: 605-340-0651

fax: 305-946-0651

Celerity Networks LLC

PO Box 547

Spearfish, SD  57783

Like us!  facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc

[image: cid:273145916@30122011-11FC]
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] difficult login with Lubuntu and fw 5.6.7

2016-07-12 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
This a known issue. I'm having it happen when I configure LAN0 to be
a part of a bridge with WLAN0.50 and add a new IP alias. You can SSH
into it and see in the log that HTTPD reported a successful login,
but nevertheless, the GUI never proceeds past the login page.

UBNT - Any progress on resolving this?


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 7/12/16 3:35 PM, Jan Van Kort wrote:


  Using Lubuntu and RJ45 ether cable, as always.
I'm experiencing with 5.6.7 a difficult login after setting IP address 
to static in network tab.
Initial 192.168.1.20 seems easy as usual, after changing to static of 
10.2.0.x I get to the html login screen on FireFox just fine but can't 
get past the login.  No error comes up, firefox just keeps the spinning 
donut active until it times out.  Is this a java issue? BTW, My smart 
phone can login via an airgateway no problem. Something about the 
Lubuntu handling of the FF vs the cell phone on FF & Lolipop, anybody 
have an answer?
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

2016-07-12 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Do you log to a remote syslog server or just the local syslog? I use
a remote syslog server and it has it's own date/time stamp on the
log entries it applies as it receives them. Obviously I'll only see
log entries if the radios are linked (if the link is required to
reach the remote syslog server). This way, I can sort by the syslog
server's time stamp and at least have solid order of events to look
at.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 7/12/16 9:22 AM, Ridgetop Networks
  wrote:


  I noticed my UBNT radios didn't seem to know about
DST, and it was making it hard to find things in syslog, so now
I've got all my devices set to GMT. Is there a better way?
  
  
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Jon
  Auer <j...@tapodi.net>
  wrote:
  
0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org
  should work, but it's not one consistent host. There's a
  chance that the host you are given could be down (there's
  a small amount of time between health checks and servers
  being pulled from the pool).
  The addresses returned by N.vendor.pool.ntp.org
vary for load balancing. You might get a different host
every time you make a DNS query.
  
  
  If you have your own stratum 1 or stratum 2 server
you should look at contributing to the NTP pool: http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/
  We have a GPS-based stratum 1 feeding some stratum 2
servers that participate in the pool. Traffic is
minimal.
  
  
  We switched to a purpose-built NTP appliance combined
with a stratum-2 cluster after we noticed that the time
from LMG CTMs and Cambium CMMs was somewhat
inconsistent. 
  At least on the LMG side we were told that their NTP
was intended only for rough tower-local NTP services (we
saw +/- 5 second variance).
  
  
  We're currently using the $300 TM1000A (make sure you
are on latest firmware) for stratum 1.
  
  


  

  On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:28 PM,
Steve Barnes <st...@pcswin.com>
wrote:
  


  
Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org
  set right and working.  I have lots of stuff
  pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time
  zone set correctly but still off an hour.
  
  
  Steve Barnes
  Wireless Operations Manager
  PCSWIN.COM
  NLBC.COM
  


  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  




-- 

  

  Andrew Kaiser
  
  Ridgetop Networks, LLC
  417-543-5513

www.ridgetopnetworks.com
  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

2016-07-11 Thread Jesse DuPont

I don't personally operate my own, but MikroTik has a full NTP
server package or you can use "ntpd" on a Linux box. In another
life, I used a Canopy CMM as the stratum 1 (direct GPS) source, then
a couple of old Linux boxes sync'd to it and everything else to the
two Linux boxes.

Jesse DuPont

Network
Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity
Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 7/11/16 12:53 PM, Darin Steffl
wrote:

What software do you use for NTP server?

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jesse
DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
wrote:

Yes, 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org is working. NTP
just syncs things to GMT time. Local time, adjusted for
timezone AND daylight savings, is always a local process.
I have many devices that don't do well with keeping up on
daylight savings time. Subsequently, they're correct
during winter and an hour off in summer.

Jesse DuPont

Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

On 7/11/16 11:28 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:

Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org set right and working. I have lots of stuff pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but still off an hour.

Steve Barnes
Wireless Operations Manager
PCSWIN.COM
NLBC.COM

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
Like us on Facebook

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

2016-07-11 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
Yes, 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org is working. NTP just syncs things to GMT
time. Local time, adjusted for timezone AND daylight savings, is
always a local process. I have many devices that don't do well with
keeping up on daylight savings time. Subsequently, they're correct
during winter and an hour off in summer.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 7/11/16 11:28 AM, Steve Barnes
  wrote:


  Is 0.ubnt.pool.ntp.org set right and working.  I have lots of stuff pointed to that and its off an hour at least. Time zone set correctly but still off an hour.


Steve Barnes
Wireless Operations Manager
PCSWIN.COM
NLBC.COM


  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] IPad App

2016-06-22 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
We're also using Docusign. Customer's have to Docusign the form
before install. Works great on mobile phones/tablets.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 6/22/16 2:19 PM, mike.l...@gmail.com
  wrote:


  
  Docusign
  
  
  www.docusign.com
  
  
  
  
  
On Jun 22, 2016, at 13:09, Shawn Burgei <sbur...@hderlink.com>
wrote:

  
  

  
  
  
  
Does anyone else use iPADS in the field
  for the installers? We are looking for an app so the
  customer can digitally sign the Service Agreement, etc.
  instead of wasting paper. Thoughts?
 
Thanks,
Shawn Burgei
 
  

  
  
___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Authentication for SMs

2016-06-22 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
One of our companies uses VISP and VISP requires that you use their
RADIUS servers.
The other company has on-premise RADIUS, but no billing system
integration. We just manage it manually (using the daloRADIUS
interface).


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 6/22/16 11:48 AM, Nigel
  Newallo-Singh wrote:


  Thanks for the responses everyone. 


So I figured RADIUS was inevitable, and I have no issues
  with this as I have good linux guys on staff. 


Bear with me here. Did you have to develop your own
  middleware to query your billing system or use a billing
  system provider (VISP, etc) that will send info to your RADIUS
  server?


If so how has been the experience so far (ie. developing
  software inhouse or using an external billing provider).
  
  
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jesse
  DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net>
  wrote:
  
 RADIUS. We're using
  RADIUS for SM auth on UBNT M5 gear (which is mac:mac sent
  as a RADIUS "User Password"); also works the same on
  MikroTik for MAC authentication. On UBNT 5AC gear, we use
  WPA2-AES w/EAP, which also uses RADIUS. WPA2-AES w/EAP is
  more complicated to setup for two reasons - 1)
  certificates need installed on the RADIUS server (can be
  self-signed); and 2) the SM needs a user/pass configured
  (it is the EAP supplicant). You could use the same
  user/pass in all SM's, but then you can't disallow a
  single SM from connecting to the AP. For this, we chose to
  use a unique user/pass for each customer. This same
  user/pass is also the customer's PPPoE user/pass.
  
  

      Jesse DuPont
  
Network Architect
email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
Celerity Networks LLC
Celerity Broadband LLC
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband

  

  
  

  On 6/22/16 10:26 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
  
  
Radius is I think the only other way?

  

  


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

  
  
  On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at
12:25 PM, Nigel Newallo-Singh <nigel.newallosi...@greendotgroup.co>
wrote:

  Hi All,


I want to implement some form of
  authentication for my Customer SMs (beside
  of course the wireless pre-shared key).


Can anyone give some good advice on
  what works to do this (Radius, etc). 
  
  
  -- 
  

  

  
Warm
Regards,
Nigel
Newallo-Singh

Re: [Ubnt_users] Authentication for SMs

2016-06-22 Thread Jesse DuPont


  
  
RADIUS. We're using RADIUS for SM auth on UBNT M5 gear (which is
mac:mac sent as a RADIUS "User Password"); also works the same on
MikroTik for MAC authentication. On UBNT 5AC gear, we use WPA2-AES
w/EAP, which also uses RADIUS. WPA2-AES w/EAP is more complicated to
setup for two reasons - 1) certificates need installed on the RADIUS
server (can be self-signed); and 2) the SM needs a user/pass
configured (it is the EAP supplicant). You could use the same
user/pass in all SM's, but then you can't disallow a single SM from
connecting to the AP. For this, we chose to use a unique user/pass
for each customer. This same user/pass is also the customer's PPPoE
user/pass.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 6/22/16 10:26 AM, Josh Luthman
  wrote:


  Radius is I think the only other way?
  

  

  
  
  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
  


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel
  Newallo-Singh <nigel.newallosi...@greendotgroup.co>
  wrote:
  
Hi All,
  
  
  I want to implement some form of authentication for
my Customer SMs (beside of course the wireless
pre-shared key).
  
  
  Can anyone give some good advice on what works to do
this (Radius, etc). 


-- 

  

  

  Warm Regards,
  Nigel
  Newallo-Singh

  
http://www.gd.tt/
  

  

  

  

  


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  


  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Burst

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

[Ubnt_users] AF11x Power Question

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Type N Jumpers

[Ubnt_users] AF11x Type N Jumpers

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware V6.0

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.03 firmware still has some bugs

Re: [Ubnt_users] Interesting...

Re: [Ubnt_users] Strange ARP issue

Re: [Ubnt_users] Odd noise floor problem

[Ubnt_users] Administrative MAC on AirPrism

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT upgrade to AC

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

Re: [Ubnt_users] V6 PD on UBNT

Re: [Ubnt_users] Powerbeam M5s unable to update firmware

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirControl2 and devices randomly going "offline"

Re: [Ubnt_users] 500 AC UNI Codes

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam Mounts

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

Re: [Ubnt_users] upgrading edgemax from 1.7 to 1.8.5 OSPF stops working

Re: [Ubnt_users] difficult login with Lubuntu and fw 5.6.7

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

Re: [Ubnt_users] NTP

Re: [Ubnt_users] IPad App

Re: [Ubnt_users] Authentication for SMs

Re: [Ubnt_users] Authentication for SMs

34 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information