Re: dnf Bus error (core dumped)
On 2020-04-22 13:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 30 > > How do I fix this? > > # dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave* > Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB 00:05 > Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00 > Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 34 kB/s | 15 kB 00:00 > Fedora 30 - x86_64 60 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00 > Bus error (core dumped) I've never encountered that error. First stab, run "rpm --rebuilddb", and try again. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
dnf Bus error (core dumped)
Hi All, Fedora 30 How do I fix this? # dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave* Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB 00:05 Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00 Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 34 kB/s | 15 kB 00:00 Fedora 30 - x86_64 60 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00 Bus error (core dumped) Perplexed, -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: printing probblems
the message come when (using Libre Office) I press the button to print. Probability /etc/cups/printers.conf need to be configured.. but inside this file I don't see nothing that concern with "document-format". The content of> /etc/cups/printers.conf is : # Printer configuration file for CUPS v2.2.12 # Written by cupsd on 2020-04-21 17:55 # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE WHEN CUPSD IS RUNNING UUID urn:uuid:d67c2c36-aba2-3f01-5353-a60b42230121 Info HP Deskjet 2510 series Location default printer MakeModel HP Deskjet 2510 Series, hpcups 3.20.3 DeviceURI usb://HP/Deskjet%202510%20series?serial=CN34B3JGDN05TX=1 State Idle StateTime 1587480569 ConfigTime 1587455963 Type 36876 Accepting Yes Shared No JobSheets none none QuotaPeriod 0 PageLimit 0 KLimit 0 OpPolicy default ErrorPolicy stop-printer in the journalctl they are some rows that I think are connected with this problem: Apr 21 10:25:04 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /jobs/ HTTP/1.1" 200 182 Cancel-Job successful-ok Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /printers/Deskjet-2510 HTTP/1.1" 200 206 Create-Job successful-ok Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: [Client 67] Returning IPP client-error-document-format- Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /printers/Deskjet-2510 HTTP/1.1" 200 5131 Send-Document client-error-document-format- Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /jobs/ HTTP/1.1" 200 182 Cancel-Job successful-ok On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:18 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 4/21/20 1:23 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I get > > this message: > > "couldn't start the printer > >please check your printer configuration" > > Where do you see this message? > > > in the journalctl they are some rows that I think are connected with > > this problem: > > Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: [Client 67] Returning IPP > > client-error-document-format-not-supported for Send-Document > > (ipp://localhost:631/printers/Deskjet-2510) from localhost. > > Maybe. > > > /etc/cups/printers.conf > > What is the URI and MakeModel of this printer in that file? > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Old release keys (was Re: tip: upgrade to 32)
On 2020-04-21 21:38, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-22 11:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Would it hurt anything to remove the old ones? Hurt? No. Cause you an inconvenience at a later date? Maybe. Example. Let's say you want to install some SW from an earlier release of Fedora that was dropped. So, you go back and find an rpm and luckily it doesn't have a dependency issue. But the rpm came from F29 and you've removed the public keys for F29. So, it won't install without using the --nogpgcheck flag. Makes sense now. Thank you! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Old release keys (was Re: tip: upgrade to 32)
On 2020-04-22 11:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Would it hurt anything to remove the old ones? Hurt? No. Cause you an inconvenience at a later date? Maybe. Example. Let's say you want to install some SW from an earlier release of Fedora that was dropped. So, you go back and find an rpm and luckily it doesn't have a dependency issue. But the rpm came from F29 and you've removed the public keys for F29. So, it won't install without using the --nogpgcheck flag. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Old release keys (was Re: tip: upgrade to 32)
On 2020-04-21 20:19, Sam Varshavchik wrote: ToddAndMargo via users writes: Hi Ed, Ooops. Forgot to reinstall the key. :'( And now everything works right. Thank you for sticking this through! You are awesome! To answer your other questions: the GPG keys for older Fedora releases are harmless. But I have believed, for quite some time, that they are a low risk security hole. A signing PGP key was compromised at least once, many years ago, forcing the whole release to get re-signed. If one of the older releases' PGP keys gets compromised, things might get a bit dicey, if a few more dominoes can get felled, in the right direction. Say someone swipes F29's PGP key, right now. Hoo boy. A lot of systems will probably trust anything signed by that key. I always thought that (these days) dnf system-upgrade should, at some point, delete the old release's pgp key. I dimly recall seeing something in Bugzilla about it. Every few releases I sift through my RPM databases, and manually delete old release keys. Why are pgp keys in the rpm database anyway? That seems like a bunch of extra work. /etc/yum.repos.d already contains: gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch So, why isn't that enough? This should be sufficient to verify signatures on download packages. Why do they have to get imported somewhere in the rpm database, as a fake package, in order to be useful? Would it hurt anything to remove the old ones? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RC, rc, ga, GA, etc.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:21:47PM -0500, David wrote: > It is not clear to a newbie what is a "ga." > > "Go Ahead" ?? > > Gamma ? > > Guaranteed Addition ? "General Availability" (ie, released to the public) RC => "Release Candidate" - Something that could be the GA release, but needs some testing. If it passes it becomes the GA release, if not there is another RC with fixes for whatever was found. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Old release keys (was Re: tip: upgrade to 32)
ToddAndMargo via users writes: Hi Ed, Ooops. Forgot to reinstall the key. :'( And now everything works right. Thank you for sticking this through! You are awesome! To answer your other questions: the GPG keys for older Fedora releases are harmless. But I have believed, for quite some time, that they are a low risk security hole. A signing PGP key was compromised at least once, many years ago, forcing the whole release to get re-signed. If one of the older releases' PGP keys gets compromised, things might get a bit dicey, if a few more dominoes can get felled, in the right direction. Say someone swipes F29's PGP key, right now. Hoo boy. A lot of systems will probably trust anything signed by that key. I always thought that (these days) dnf system-upgrade should, at some point, delete the old release's pgp key. I dimly recall seeing something in Bugzilla about it. Every few releases I sift through my RPM databases, and manually delete old release keys. Why are pgp keys in the rpm database anyway? That seems like a bunch of extra work. /etc/yum.repos.d already contains: gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch So, why isn't that enough? This should be sufficient to verify signatures on download packages. Why do they have to get imported somewhere in the rpm database, as a fake package, in order to be useful? pgpytOw3wccm6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: GA definition
For you newbies, GA In the software release life cycle, general availability (GA) refers to the marketing phase when all "practical" developmental activities pertaining to the Linux distribution have been completed. At this point, the distribution is allegedly or hopefully available for production usage. Final development activities encompass compliance and security tests, as well as localization and publishing an iso image to the world via the internet. General availability is a part of the release phase of a Linux distribution, in this case, Fedora 32, and is preceded by the release candidate (RC) phase. General availability is also known as a "Production Release." This term and abbreviation is commonly used by software developers, and the GA release is highly anticipated by fans of that distribution. Although, many Linux users will wait till the dust settles, and instead install an iso image later on, after the early adopters have posted positive reviews, or just wait for the first round of updates. Feel free to correct or reword that, as I took the liberty to try to water it down. D.L. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to view files over the Internet?
On 2020-04-18 00:50, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/17/20 4:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/17/20 4:28 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I have a scenario where I have a Fedora server at one location and five Windows workstations, each at a different location. The customer wants to give the five remote workstations the ability to view (not edit) certain documents. Question, what is the best to go about this? NextCloud? This was a serious suggestion, but maybe it needs more description. It's not hard to setup, one person can set a certain folder on their computer to automatically sync with the server or else you can upload to it. You either create another user for the workstations or you can create a link that they can use to access the files. Hi Sam, Found a wonderful tutorial: https://fedoramagazine.org/build-your-own-cloud-with-fedora-31-and-nextcloud-server/ -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: SSSD Howto: Why not use pam-config on SUSE/openSUSE?
> On 22 Apr 2020, at 06:28, Johannes Kastl wrote: > > On 21.04.20 at 01:59 William Brown wrote: >>> On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:08, Johannes Kastl wrote: > >>> *g* >> >> Sorry I don't understand this comment? > > I knew I should have used my usual smiley instead. > > Basically I wanted to show that this indeed a valid reason for not using > pam-config... All good, thanks for the explanation. :) > > Johannes > > -- > Johannes Kastl > Linux Consultant & Trainer > Tel.: +49 (0) 151 2372 5802 > Mail: ka...@b1-systems.de > > B1 Systems GmbH > Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg > http://www.b1-systems.de > GF: Ralph Dehner > Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 > > ___ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: Exporting to LDIF
> On 22 Apr 2020, at 07:38, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > On 4/20/20 10:29 PM, William Brown wrote: >> >>> On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:34, Johannes Kastl wrote: >>> >>> On 17.04.20 at 10:38 Johannes Kastl wrote: Hi again, I found several links on how to export from 389 to LDIF. >>> On a related note: >>> >>> https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-ds-admin-migration.html >>> >>> ---cite--- >>> foreach db /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db/* >>> db2ldif -n db -a \ >>> /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db/db.ldif >>> end >>> ---/cite--- >>> >>> Is this outdated, too? >> That looks very outdated to me ... :( > The wiki is full of very old content. It's hard to maintain it all, just too > much content... A few years ago I did a big clean out, maybe it's time to do it again ... >> >>> Because I have lots of files and one directory in the directory (if I >>> picked the >>> correct one?): >>> # ll /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-localhost/db/ total 117948 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv51 Apr 16 16:53 DBVERSION -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 24576 Apr 16 16:53 __db.001 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 7102464 Apr 20 20:30 __db.002 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 103243776 Apr 20 20:23 __db.003 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 1081344 Apr 20 20:30 __db.004 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 8863744 Apr 20 20:23 __db.005 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 90112 Apr 16 17:04 __db.006 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 10485760 Apr 16 17:05 log.01 drwx-- 2 dirsrv dirsrv 4096 Apr 16 17:03 userroot >>> Kind Regards, >>> Johannes >>> >>> -- >>> Johannes Kastl >>> Linux Consultant & Trainer >>> Tel.: +49 (0) 151 2372 5802 >>> Mail: ka...@b1-systems.de >>> >>> B1 Systems GmbH >>> Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg >>> http://www.b1-systems.de >>> GF: Ralph Dehner >>> Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 >>> >>> ___ >>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> — >> Sincerely, >> >> William Brown >> >> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server >> SUSE Labs >> ___ >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- > > 389 Directory Server Development Team — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: RC, rc, ga, GA, etc.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:22 PM David wrote: > It is not clear to a newbie what is a "ga." > > "Go Ahead" ?? > > Gamma ? > > Guaranteed Addition ? > Generally Available? :) Thanks, Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
RC, rc, ga, GA, etc.
It is not clear to a newbie what is a "ga." "Go Ahead" ?? Gamma ? Guaranteed Addition ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: Exporting to LDIF
On 4/20/20 10:29 PM, William Brown wrote: On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:34, Johannes Kastl wrote: On 17.04.20 at 10:38 Johannes Kastl wrote: Hi again, I found several links on how to export from 389 to LDIF. On a related note: https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-ds-admin-migration.html ---cite--- foreach db /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db/* db2ldif -n db -a \ /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-instance/db/db.ldif end ---/cite--- Is this outdated, too? That looks very outdated to me ... :( The wiki is full of very old content. It's hard to maintain it all, just too much content... Because I have lots of files and one directory in the directory (if I picked the correct one?): # ll /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-localhost/db/ total 117948 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv51 Apr 16 16:53 DBVERSION -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 24576 Apr 16 16:53 __db.001 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 7102464 Apr 20 20:30 __db.002 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 103243776 Apr 20 20:23 __db.003 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 1081344 Apr 20 20:30 __db.004 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 8863744 Apr 20 20:23 __db.005 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 90112 Apr 16 17:04 __db.006 -rw--- 1 dirsrv dirsrv 10485760 Apr 16 17:05 log.01 drwx-- 2 dirsrv dirsrv 4096 Apr 16 17:03 userroot Kind Regards, Johannes -- Johannes Kastl Linux Consultant & Trainer Tel.: +49 (0) 151 2372 5802 Mail: ka...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: Setting up replication: HowTo? Tutorials?
On 4/21/20 4:25 PM, Johannes Kastl wrote: Hi Mark, On 21.04.20 at 04:05 Mark Reynolds wrote: The first place you should look is the official documentation, it covers the new CLI and UI processes, including replication. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/ Thanks for the answer. Will check that and come back if questions arise. How much backwards can I use the RedHat documentation without fear of it being outdated? As some of the older documentation is using e.g. db2ldif instead of the newer `dsctl localhost db2ldif`, it would be good to know which versions to trust and which ones to ignore. Is there some kind of overview? Or a list of features that were changed in a non-backward-compatible manner? I guess 11 is safe: The 11 docs cover the new UI and CLI in 389-ds-base-1.4.x. For 389-ds-base-1.3.x & old legacy tools look at the RHDS 10 docs: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/ HTH, Mark https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/ Kind Regards, Johannes ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:27:18 -0500 Roger Heflin wrote: > I would check the rating on your HDMI cable, the older ones aren't > supposed to be able to support greater than 1080p rates, so if you > cable is very old it may not support the speed. > > There is probably something written on the cable ends and/or the side > of the cable itself. Mine says high speed on the side which indicates > it can support at best 4k-30 and is an hdmi 1.4 cable (assuming the > ends themselves are also compliant) but nothing more. > > see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI Thanks, I guess my problem with the USB-C hub. Best wishes, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:47:14 -0300 "George N. White III" wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:49:59 -0700 stan via users < > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500 > > > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 > > > > > > > > > > However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use > > > > > xrandr (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get > > > > > an option for 3840x2160. Here is what I get: > > > > > > I see this in your original email in the xrandr output. > > > >3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 > > > Does that not indicate that it is running at 3840x2160 at 60Hz? > > > > Sorry, this line was for the laptop screen. But i have realized the issue. > > A USB-C to HDMI 2.0 is needed, apparently the type-C multihub sold by Dell > > does not work for UHD. Changing to the USB-C to HDMI dongle has fixed the > > issue and 3840x2160 is available. > > > > Life would be so much easier without cables and connectors. > > > > > I have a different question however: is it safe to work now with the lid > > closed or will the laptop overheat? I have switched off the screen for the > > laptop using xrandr. > > > > With the internal screen off the heat production should be reduced. The > laptop shouldn't overheat, but may slow down, depending on ambient > temperatures. In our globally warmer future, seasonal migration may be > necessary to keep laptops running at full speed. > > There are several tools to monitor temperatures, fan speed, and CPU > loads. I've never needed to worry about GPU overheating, so I'm not sure > what, if any, instrumentation is available. > Thanks very much! I just wanted to make sure. I do not want to lose the laptop in this isolationist environment. I have a different question, and that is, that the laptop has a HiDPI screen so needed tweaks to .Xresources to get it to display in a readable way. However, this is not needed for the attached monitor so is it possible to set things up so that the laptop screen scales things differently from the monitor? I have the following in my .Xresources for the laptop screen. ! ! Custom DPI ! ! Xft.dpi: 192 Xft.autohint: 0 Xft.lcdfilter: lcddefault Xft.hintstyle: hintslight Xft.hinting: true Xft.antialias: 1 Xft.rgba: rgb Xcursor.size: 32 - Which looks fine on my laptop but things look fuzzier on the monitor. How do I get this to be higher resolution for the monitor and it to also work on the HiDPI screen? I use openbox as my WM (and do not use a DE). Many thanks and best wishes, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:30, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:49:59 -0700 stan via users < > users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500 > > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor. > > > > > > > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 > > > > > > > > However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use > > > > xrandr (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get > > > > an option for 3840x2160. Here is what I get: > > > > I see this in your original email in the xrandr output. > > >3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 > > Does that not indicate that it is running at 3840x2160 at 60Hz? > > Sorry, this line was for the laptop screen. But i have realized the issue. > A USB-C to HDMI 2.0 is needed, apparently the type-C multihub sold by Dell > does not work for UHD. Changing to the USB-C to HDMI dongle has fixed the > issue and 3840x2160 is available. > Life would be so much easier without cables and connectors. > > I have a different question however: is it safe to work now with the lid > closed or will the laptop overheat? I have switched off the screen for the > laptop using xrandr. > With the internal screen off the heat production should be reduced. The laptop shouldn't overheat, but may slow down, depending on ambient temperatures. In our globally warmer future, seasonal migration may be necessary to keep laptops running at full speed. There are several tools to monitor temperatures, fan speed, and CPU loads. I've never needed to worry about GPU overheating, so I'm not sure what, if any, instrumentation is available. > Many thanks, > Ranjan > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: SSSD Howto: Why not use pam-config on SUSE/openSUSE?
On 21.04.20 at 01:59 William Brown wrote: >> On 21 Apr 2020, at 06:08, Johannes Kastl wrote: >> *g* > > Sorry I don't understand this comment? I knew I should have used my usual smiley instead. Basically I wanted to show that this indeed a valid reason for not using pam-config... Johannes -- Johannes Kastl Linux Consultant & Trainer Tel.: +49 (0) 151 2372 5802 Mail: ka...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: Setting up replication: HowTo? Tutorials?
Hi Mark, On 21.04.20 at 04:05 Mark Reynolds wrote: > The first place you should look is the official documentation, it covers the > new > CLI and UI processes, including replication. > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/ Thanks for the answer. Will check that and come back if questions arise. How much backwards can I use the RedHat documentation without fear of it being outdated? As some of the older documentation is using e.g. db2ldif instead of the newer `dsctl localhost db2ldif`, it would be good to know which versions to trust and which ones to ignore. Is there some kind of overview? Or a list of features that were changed in a non-backward-compatible manner? I guess 11 is safe: > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11/ Kind Regards, Johannes -- Johannes Kastl Linux Consultant & Trainer Tel.: +49 (0) 151 2372 5802 Mail: ka...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:49:59 -0700 stan via users wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor. > > > > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 > > > > > > However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use > > > xrandr (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get > > > an option for 3840x2160. Here is what I get: > > I see this in your original email in the xrandr output. > >3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 > Does that not indicate that it is running at 3840x2160 at 60Hz? Sorry, this line was for the laptop screen. But i have realized the issue. A USB-C to HDMI 2.0 is needed, apparently the type-C multihub sold by Dell does not work for UHD. Changing to the USB-C to HDMI dongle has fixed the issue and 3840x2160 is available. I have a different question however: is it safe to work now with the lid closed or will the laptop overheat? I have switched off the screen for the laptop using xrandr. Many thanks, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
I would check the rating on your HDMI cable, the older ones aren't supposed to be able to support greater than 1080p rates, so if you cable is very old it may not support the speed. There is probably something written on the cable ends and/or the side of the cable itself. Mine says high speed on the side which indicates it can support at best 4k-30 and is an hdmi 1.4 cable (assuming the ends themselves are also compliant) but nothing more. see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 1:51 PM stan via users wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor. > > > > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 > > > > > > However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use > > > xrandr (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get > > > an option for 3840x2160. Here is what I get: > > I see this in your original email in the xrandr output. > >3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 > Does that not indicate that it is running at 3840x2160 at 60Hz? > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: printing probblems
On 4/21/20 1:23 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote: after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I get this message: "couldn't start the printer please check your printer configuration" Where do you see this message? in the journalctl they are some rows that I think are connected with this problem: Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: [Client 67] Returning IPP client-error-document-format-not-supported for Send-Document (ipp://localhost:631/printers/Deskjet-2510) from localhost. Maybe. /etc/cups/printers.conf What is the URI and MakeModel of this printer in that file? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:40:30 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor. > > > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 > > > > However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use > > xrandr (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get > > an option for 3840x2160. Here is what I get: I see this in your original email in the xrandr output. >3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 Does that not indicate that it is running at 3840x2160 at 60Hz? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:17:24 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Hi, > > I recently got myself a UHD monitor. > > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 > > However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use xrandr > (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get an option for > 3840x2160. Here is what I get: > > $ xrandr > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 2160, maximum 16384 x 16384 > eDP-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y > axis) 294mm x 165mm >3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 >3200x1800 59.9659.94 >2880x1620 59.9659.97 >2560x1600 59.9959.97 >2560x1440 59.9959.9959.9659.95 >2048x1536 60.00 >1920x1440 60.00 >1856x1392 60.01 >1792x1344 60.01 >2048x1152 59.9959.9859.9059.91 >1920x1200 59.8859.95 >1920x1080 60.0159.9759.9659.93 >1600x1200 60.00 >1680x1050 59.9559.88 >1400x1050 59.98 >1600x900 59.9959.9459.9559.82 >1280x1024 60.02 >1400x900 59.9659.88 >1280x960 60.00 >1440x810 60.0059.97 >1368x768 59.8859.85 >1280x800 59.9959.9759.8159.91 >1280x720 60.0059.9959.8659.74 >1024x768 60.0460.00 >960x720 60.00 >928x696 60.05 >896x672 60.01 >1024x576 59.9559.9659.9059.82 >960x600 59.9360.00 >960x540 59.9659.9959.6359.82 >800x600 60.0060.3256.25 >840x525 60.0159.88 >864x486 59.9259.57 >700x525 59.98 >800x450 59.9559.82 >640x512 60.02 >700x450 59.9659.88 >640x480 60.0059.94 >720x405 59.5158.99 >684x384 59.8859.85 >640x400 59.8859.98 >640x360 59.8659.8359.8459.32 >512x384 60.00 >512x288 60.0059.92 >480x270 59.6359.82 >400x300 60.3256.34 >432x243 59.9259.57 >320x240 60.05 >360x202 59.5159.13 >320x180 59.8459.32 > DP-1 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 597mm > x 336mm >1920x1080 60.00* 50.0059.94 >1680x1050 59.88 >1280x1024 75.0260.02 >1440x900 59.90 >1280x960 60.00 >1280x720 60.0050.0059.94 >1024x768 75.0370.0760.00 >832x624 74.55 >800x600 72.1975.0060.3256.25 >720x576 50.00 >720x480 60.0059.94 >640x480 75.0072.8166.6760.0059.94 >720x400 70.08 > > Why is this so, and what do I do to get the UHD resolution? I would really > like to match my laptop resolution (in fact, this was why I bought this > monitor). > > The box says 4K UHD 3840x2160 resolution. Any suggestions? > Some additional information: the laptop is a Dell XPS 13 circa 2018, and has an i7 processor. I don't quite recall how to provide information of the graphics card, but it is whatever the laptop came with. Many thanks, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: printing probblems
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:23:44 +0300 Angelo Moreschini wrote: > after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I > get this message: > "couldn't start the printer > please check your printer configuration" > Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST > /printers/Deskjet-2510 HTTP/1.1" 200 5131 Send-Document > client-error-document-format-not-supported I don't know how much help it is, but what is the format of the document you are sending? It seems the printer driver doesn't recognize it. Maybe try a simple text document? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
F31 - getting UHD external monitor to display at 3840x2160 resolution
Hi, I recently got myself a UHD monitor. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07JXCR263?tag=aboutcom02lifewire-20=ogi=1=1=4138562%7Cneef17e57867342f0bc4b3af20a9ba60801 However, when I connect to my 3840x2160 resolution laptop and use xrandr (through HDMI, supplied with the monitor) I do not even get an option for 3840x2160. Here is what I get: $ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 2160, maximum 16384 x 16384 eDP-1 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 294mm x 165mm 3840x2160 60.00*+ 59.9859.9748.00 3200x1800 59.9659.94 2880x1620 59.9659.97 2560x1600 59.9959.97 2560x1440 59.9959.9959.9659.95 2048x1536 60.00 1920x1440 60.00 1856x1392 60.01 1792x1344 60.01 2048x1152 59.9959.9859.9059.91 1920x1200 59.8859.95 1920x1080 60.0159.9759.9659.93 1600x1200 60.00 1680x1050 59.9559.88 1400x1050 59.98 1600x900 59.9959.9459.9559.82 1280x1024 60.02 1400x900 59.9659.88 1280x960 60.00 1440x810 60.0059.97 1368x768 59.8859.85 1280x800 59.9959.9759.8159.91 1280x720 60.0059.9959.8659.74 1024x768 60.0460.00 960x720 60.00 928x696 60.05 896x672 60.01 1024x576 59.9559.9659.9059.82 960x600 59.9360.00 960x540 59.9659.9959.6359.82 800x600 60.0060.3256.25 840x525 60.0159.88 864x486 59.9259.57 700x525 59.98 800x450 59.9559.82 640x512 60.02 700x450 59.9659.88 640x480 60.0059.94 720x405 59.5158.99 684x384 59.8859.85 640x400 59.8859.98 640x360 59.8659.8359.8459.32 512x384 60.00 512x288 60.0059.92 480x270 59.6359.82 400x300 60.3256.34 432x243 59.9259.57 320x240 60.05 360x202 59.5159.13 320x180 59.8459.32 DP-1 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 597mm x 336mm 1920x1080 60.00* 50.0059.94 1680x1050 59.88 1280x1024 75.0260.02 1440x900 59.90 1280x960 60.00 1280x720 60.0050.0059.94 1024x768 75.0370.0760.00 832x624 74.55 800x600 72.1975.0060.3256.25 720x576 50.00 720x480 60.0059.94 640x480 75.0072.8166.6760.0059.94 720x400 70.08 Why is this so, and what do I do to get the UHD resolution? I would really like to match my laptop resolution (in fact, this was why I bought this monitor). The box says 4K UHD 3840x2160 resolution. Any suggestions? Many thanks, Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: system monitoring/security - possibly off topic
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:23 PM bruce wrote: > > Hey Ed. > > Thanks for the reply. > > Regarding the security/monitoring issue. > > Here's my use case: > > I'm looking to have multiple servers. > Servers would be running different apps for different purposes. > All Servers running Fed > -DB Server -mysql/mariadb > -Server running webapps/httpd > -Servers running compute operations > > All servers configured to run ssh - sshd_config properly configured to limit > access > All servers configured to run with minimal ports turned on > All servers with selinux > > My goal would be to have a monitoring/security server/webapp > that allows a user to quickly "see" if there's an issue > with any of the servers/processes > > I think it makes sense to check/monitor/be alerted if: > > -there's a user attempt to access > -there's a ddos on one of the webapps > -there's a root/file issue > -there's a port access issue > -possible intrusion attempts > -weird services used > -any others??? > > > possible software/apps to be installed for security > --rkhunter > --failtoban > --selinux > --clamav -- although not sure the proect would need a mail server/platform > --logMonitoring app (which one) > --app to check file/dir/user settings (which one) > --scanning app/service (which one) > ---for ports > ---for services > ---for log files > ---for user accounts > > > I think it makes sense to try to define, or get my head around the things > that should be checked out or monitored. Once I get these things nailed down, > I can figureout the "best" process to be able to monitor the items, as well > as display them in some sort of dashboard. > > > I've looked over a number of different sites for rhel/ubuntu/fedora/etc.. > Most of the sites discuss hardening ssh, as well as looking over the > services/ports, and managing the users/files/dirs. > > I'm thinking the things to check for:: > > Users/User Accounts > logins/access > ports > services/processes > files/dirs -perms/user owner > log files > Any other things that should be checked/examined/considered? > > Once I can get a good list of high level things to check for/secure, I can > figure out the tools to use, as well as how to roll all of this up to some > sort of dashboard. > > So my thought process will be: > 1) Identify the high level things to check for/secure/monitor for the given > Server Type > 2) Identify the tools to run the scans for the Server Type > 3) Figure out how to roll the results for each server to a "central > monitoring/dashboard process" > > Does this make sense? > > Thoughts/comments welcome > zeek? Security Onion? > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> On 2020-04-21 21:33, bruce wrote: >> > Not willing to step on toes. Is asking for opinions on tools to do >> > system/security monitoring off topic? Been doing research, thought I'd ask >> > here as well - if it's acceptable? >> >> Not off topic at all. >> >> Fedora supplies tools used in the area. So, all you would need do is to >> outline your goals, what you've learned >> in your research, and how you'd like to get help from the community. >> >> -- >> The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. >> ___ >> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: system monitoring/security - possibly off topic
Hey Ed. Thanks for the reply. Regarding the security/monitoring issue. Here's my use case: I'm looking to have multiple servers. Servers would be running different apps for different purposes. All Servers running Fed -DB Server -mysql/mariadb -Server running webapps/httpd -Servers running compute operations All servers configured to run ssh - sshd_config properly configured to limit access All servers configured to run with minimal ports turned on All servers with selinux My goal would be to have a monitoring/security server/webapp that allows a user to quickly "see" if there's an issue with any of the servers/processes I think it makes sense to check/monitor/be alerted if: -there's a user attempt to access -there's a ddos on one of the webapps -there's a root/file issue -there's a port access issue -possible intrusion attempts -weird services used -any others??? possible software/apps to be installed for security --rkhunter --failtoban --selinux --clamav -- although not sure the proect would need a mail server/platform --logMonitoring app (which one) --app to check file/dir/user settings (which one) --scanning app/service (which one) ---for ports ---for services ---for log files ---for user accounts I think it makes sense to try to define, or get my head around the things that should be checked out or monitored. Once I get these things nailed down, I can figureout the "best" process to be able to monitor the items, as well as display them in some sort of dashboard. I've looked over a number of different sites for rhel/ubuntu/fedora/etc.. Most of the sites discuss hardening ssh, as well as looking over the services/ports, and managing the users/files/dirs. I'm thinking the things to check for:: Users/User Accounts logins/access ports services/processes files/dirs -perms/user owner log files Any other things that should be checked/examined/considered? Once I can get a good list of high level things to check for/secure, I can figure out the tools to use, as well as how to roll all of this up to some sort of dashboard. So my thought process will be: 1) Identify the high level things to check for/secure/monitor for the given Server Type 2) Identify the tools to run the scans for the Server Type 3) Figure out how to roll the results for each server to a "central monitoring/dashboard process" Does this make sense? Thoughts/comments welcome On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:49 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-04-21 21:33, bruce wrote: > > Not willing to step on toes. Is asking for opinions on tools to do > system/security monitoring off topic? Been doing research, thought I'd ask > here as well - if it's acceptable? > > Not off topic at all. > > Fedora supplies tools used in the area. So, all you would need do is to > outline your goals, what you've learned > in your research, and how you'd like to get help from the community. > > -- > The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 today or next week?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:48 AM Tom Horsley wrote: > > I looked at the fedora-announce list archives and there was > only about one message a month or so old. > The logistics[1], devel-announce[2], and test-announce[3], all get announcements of Go/No-Go decision. I also publish a weekly post on the Community Blog[4] with high-level updates, although I didn't explicitly note the No-Go decision this time. To provide some more context for the dates, when we build the schedule we have two release dates for each milestone: 1. "Preferred target date": this is what we hope to hit, but it's a stretch goal 2. "Target date #1": this is one week after the "preferred target" and is the date that we plan around. If we hit this, we still consider the release "on-time". [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/logistics.lists.fedoraproject.org/ [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-announce.lists.fedoraproject.org/ [3] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test-announce.lists.fedoraproject.org/ [4] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/category/program-management/ -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: system monitoring/security - possibly off topic
On 2020-04-21 21:33, bruce wrote: > Not willing to step on toes. Is asking for opinions on tools to do > system/security monitoring off topic? Been doing research, thought I'd ask > here as well - if it's acceptable? Not off topic at all. Fedora supplies tools used in the area. So, all you would need do is to outline your goals, what you've learned in your research, and how you'd like to get help from the community. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 today or next week?
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:28:36 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > The following was sent to the announce list on Friday last. I looked at the fedora-announce list archives and there was only about one message a month or so old. But I just found the fedora-test-announce list archives :-). So now I know where to look. Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
system monitoring/security - possibly off topic
Hey. Not willing to step on toes. Is asking for opinions on tools to do system/security monitoring off topic? Been doing research, thought I'd ask here as well - if it's acceptable? thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 today or next week?
On 2020-04-21 21:14, Tom Horsley wrote: > I haven't been able to find anything that looks like an > official delay announcement, just a schedule listing with > the obscure info about today being the preferred target > and the 28th being the current target. I can't tell what > that means :-). The following was sent to the announce list on Friday last. Due to open blocker bugs, Fedora 32 Final was declared "no-go". We will reconvene at 1700 UTC on Thursday, 23 April[1] to re-evaluate. If we determine at that time that Fedora 32 is go, it will release on the "target release date #1" of 28 April. Also, on announce, Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 32 today or next week?
I haven't been able to find anything that looks like an official delay announcement, just a schedule listing with the obscure info about today being the preferred target and the 28th being the current target. I can't tell what that means :-). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cryptsetup re-encrypt with SHA-512 ?
cryptsetup reencrypt --hash sha512 /dev/sdx This works but it will re-encrypt the entire device. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 1:30 PM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > Is it possible to re-encrypt a partition with the > > cryptsetup reencrypt > > command, to use the SHA-512 hash ? > > Currently, my partition uses SHA-256, so I want to reencrypt without > losing any data. I have heard that the cryptsetup reencrypt does online > re-encryption, but the man page is not clear about how you can introduce a > new hash. > > Is it even possible ? > > -- > Regards, > Sreyan Chakravarty > -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 02:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 17:25, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
You still don't have
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
a.k.a. gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8
installed.
How did
sudo rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
fail?
Same error:
Public key for brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch.rpm
is not installed
Isn't that error message the result of trying to install brave-browser?
As I said
It seems you *don't* get...
[root@f31x ~]# rpm -qa | grep c2d4e821-5e7252b8
gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8
Do you?
So, you have to import it with the "rpm --import" command. Did that work?
Hi Ed,
Ooops. Forgot to reinstall the key. :'(
And now everything works right.
Thank you for sticking this through! You are awesome!
-T
# rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
# rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32)
public key
# dnf install brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch
Last metadata expiration check: 1:35:01 ago on Tue 21 Apr 2020 01:27:40
AM PDT.
Dependencies resolved.
Package Arch Version
Repository
Size
Installing:
brave-keyring
noarch 1.8-1
brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_ 11 k
Transaction Summary
Install 1 Package
Total size: 11 k
Installed size: 11 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[SKIPPED] brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch.rpm: Already downloaded
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
Preparing:
1/1
Installing : brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch
1/1
Running scriptlet: brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch
1/1
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start atd.service
Failed to start atd.service: Unit atd.service not found.
warning: %post(brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package brave-keyring
Verifying: brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch
1/1
Installed:
brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch
Complete!
# dnf install brave-browser
Last metadata expiration check: 1:35:40 ago on Tue 21 Apr 2020 01:27:40
AM PDT.
Dependencies resolved.
Package Arch Version Repository
Size
Installing:
brave-browser
x86_64 1.7.92-1
brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_ 72 M
Transaction Summary
Install 1 Package
Total download size: 72 M
Installed size: 72 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm 944 kB/s | 72 MB
01:18
Total 944 kB/s | 72 MB
01:18
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
Preparing:
1/1
Running scriptlet: brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64
1/1
Installing : brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64
1/1
Running scriptlet: brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64
1/1
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start atd.service
Failed to start atd.service: Unit atd.service not found.
Verifying: brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64
1/1
Installed:
brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64
Complete!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 19:55 -0400, Stephen Perkins wrote: > This horse is dead. Beating it will add nothing to Fedora users > lives. I buy on Swanson using FF and have NO problems. +1 Entertaining though it is, little if any of this thread has to do with Fedora. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 17:25, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> You still don't have >> >> c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key >> a.k.a. gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8 >> >> installed. >> >> How did >> >> sudo rpm --import >> https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc >> >> fail? > > Same error: > > Public key for brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch.rpm > is not installed > Isn't that error message the result of trying to install brave-browser? As I said It seems you *don't* get... [root@f31x ~]# rpm -qa | grep c2d4e821-5e7252b8 gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Do you? So, you have to import it with the "rpm --import" command. Did that work? -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 02:15, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 16:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 01:33, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Still getting
warning:
/var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed
Check
[egreshko@f32x ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
Hi Ed,
# rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5d13a788 gpg(Brave Software )
9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
How to I remove the brave on so I can start over?
Also, do I need all the way back to Fedora 27?
sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5d13a788 (probably optional)
sudo rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
should get you gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8 installed.
Reinstall did not work. Poop!
But the old one did remove
Do I need all those old keys? Or are they not hurting
anything?
# rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
You still don't have
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
a.k.a. gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8
installed.
How did
sudo rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
fail?
Same error:
Public key for brave-keyring-1.8-1.noarch.rpm
is not installed
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 16:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 01:33, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Still getting
>
> warning:
> /var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
> Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
> Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed
Check
[egreshko@f32x ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n'
gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public
key
>>>
>>> Hi Ed,
>>>
>>> # rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
>>> c2d4e821-5d13a788 gpg(Brave Software )
>>> 9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
>>> 429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
>>> f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
>>> 3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
>>> cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
>>> 12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public
>>> key
>>>
>>> How to I remove the brave on so I can start over?
>>>
>>> Also, do I need all the way back to Fedora 27?
>>>
>>
>> sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5d13a788 (probably optional)
>>
>> sudo rpm --import
>> https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
>> should get you gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8 installed.
>>
>
> Reinstall did not work. Poop!
>
> But the old one did remove
>
> Do I need all those old keys? Or are they not hurting
> anything?
>
> # rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
> 9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
> 429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
> f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
> 3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
> cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
> 12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
You still don't have
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
a.k.a. gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8
installed.
How did
sudo rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
fail?
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 01:33, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Still getting
warning:
/var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed
Check
[egreshko@f32x ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
Hi Ed,
# rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5d13a788 gpg(Brave Software )
9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
How to I remove the brave on so I can start over?
Also, do I need all the way back to Fedora 27?
sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5d13a788 (probably optional)
sudo rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
should get you gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8 installed.
Reinstall did not work. Poop!
But the old one did remove
Do I need all those old keys? Or are they not hurting
anything?
# rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32)
public key
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 16:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> Still getting
>>>
>>> warning:
>>> /var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
>>> Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
>>> Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed
>>
>> Check
>>
>> [egreshko@f32x ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n'
>> gpg-pubkey*
>> c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
>> 12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public
>> key
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> # rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
> c2d4e821-5d13a788 gpg(Brave Software )
> 9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
> 429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
> f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
> 3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
> cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
> 12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
>
> How to I remove the brave on so I can start over?
>
> Also, do I need all the way back to Fedora 27?
>
sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5d13a788 (probably optional)
sudo rpm --import https://brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com/brave-core.asc
should get you gpg-pubkey-c2d4e821-5e7252b8 installed.
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
printing probblems
after I reinstalled cups service, my printer not works any more ; I get this message: "couldn't start the printer please check your printer configuration" in the journalctl they are some rows that I think are connected with this problem: -- Apr 21 10:25:04 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /jobs/ HTTP/1.1" 200 182 Cancel-Job successful-ok Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /printers/Deskjet-2510 HTTP/1.1" 200 206 Create-Job successful-ok Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: [Client 67] Returning IPP client-error-document-format-not-supported for Send-Document (ipp://localhost:631/printers/Deskjet-2510) from localhost. Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /printers/Deskjet-2510 HTTP/1.1" 200 5131 Send-Document client-error-document-format-not-supported Apr 21 10:26:42 pluto cupsd[1023]: REQUEST localhost - - "POST /jobs/ HTTP/1.1" 200 182 Cancel-Job successful-ok as well I tried to understand the problem I was not able to do it.. : I looked the configuration files : /etc/cups/cupsd.conf /etc/cups/printers.conf I reinstalled HPLIP without succes.. I found also some information that need create or configure a coups-filter, but I am not able to do this... I would like some help in this problem thank you Angelo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-20 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Still getting
warning:
/var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed
Check
[egreshko@f32x ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
Hi Ed,
# rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5d13a788 gpg(Brave Software )
9db62fb1-59920156 gpg(Fedora 28 (28) )
429476b4-5a886537 gpg(Fedora 29 (29) )
f5282ee4-58ac92a3 gpg(Fedora 27 (27) )
3c3359c4-5c6ae44d gpg(Fedora (31) )
cfc659b9-5b6eac67 gpg(Fedora (30) )
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32)
public key
How to I remove the brave on so I can start over?
Also, do I need all the way back to Fedora 27?
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cryptsetup re-encrypt with SHA-512 ?
Is it possible to re-encrypt a partition with the cryptsetup reencrypt command, to use the SHA-512 hash ? Currently, my partition uses SHA-256, so I want to reencrypt without losing any data. I have heard that the cryptsetup reencrypt does online re-encryption, but the man page is not clear about how you can introduce a new hash. Is it even possible ? -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-21 14:07, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Still getting
>
> warning:
> /var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm:
> Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY
> Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed
Check
[egreshko@f32x ~]$ rpm -qa --qf '%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{SUMMARY}\n' gpg-pubkey*
c2d4e821-5e7252b8 Brave Software public key
12c944d0-5d5156ab Fedora (32) public key
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: tip: upgrade to 32
On 2020-04-20 18:29, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-04-19 03:30, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2020-04-18 11:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, To get FC32 to upgrade on on eof my VM's, I have to add --disablerepo=brave* to the following: #dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh --disablerepo=brave* ... # dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32 --allowerasing --best --disablerepo=brave* -T Opened: GPG check FAILED on RPM installation with Fedora 32 https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/9315 I checked that open issue. It doesn't appear as any action has been taken since it shows Assignees No one assigned Labels None yet Projects None yet Milestone No milestone Linked pull requests Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. None yet I did the following 1. Installed Brave on a fully updated F31 VM. No Problems 2. Installed Brave on a fully updated F32 Beta VM. No Problems 3. Upgraded the F31 VM by doing sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 And the upgrade succeeded without problems. You may want to run your test again. Still getting warning: /var/cache/dnf/brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_-d55d330619c02b48/packages/brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA512 Signature, key ID 82d3dc6c: NOKEY Public key for brave-browser-1.7.92-1.x86_64.rpm is not installed ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
