[ZION] JS quote

2002-12-05 Thread Jim Cobabe

At this time, the truth on the guilty should not be told openly, strange 
as this may seem, yet this is a policy. We must use precaution in 
bringing sinners to justice, lest in exposing these heinous sins we draw 
the indignation of a Gentile world upon us (and, to their imagination, 
justly too). It is necessary to hold an influence in the world, and thus 
spare ourselves an extermination; and also accomplish our end in 
spreading the Gospel, or holiness, in the earth. If we were brought to 
desolation, the disobedient would find no help. There are some who are 
obedient, yet men cannot steady the ark—my arm cannot do it—God must 
steady it. To the iniquitous show yourselves merciful.

 I am advised by some of the heads of the Church to tell the Relief 
Society to be virtuous, but to save the Church from desolation and the 
sword; beware, be still, be prudent, repent, reform, but do it in a way 
not to destroy all around you. I do not want to cloak iniquity—all 
things contrary to the will of God, should be cast from us, but don't do 
more hurt than good, with your tongues—be pure in heart. Jesus designs 
to save the people out of their sins. Said Jesus, "Ye shall do the work, 
which ye see me do." These are the grand key-words for the society to 
act upon. If I were not in your midst to aid and counsel you, the devil 
would overcome you. I want the innocent to go free—rather spare ten 
iniquitous among you, than condemn one innocent one. "Fret not thyself 
because of evildoers." God will see to it. (May 26, 1842.) 

—DHC 5:19-21.


(Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, selected and 
arranged by Joseph Fielding Smith [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 
1976], 239.)

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Teaching Correct Principle

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
After much pondering, Elmer L. Fairbank favored us with:

I know what you are saying and agree in principle, but please read this 
carefully and see if the phrase "puffed up with their own " in the last two sentences doesn't jump out at you?  Signaturus 
rhetoric!  Do you really feel that way?

I can see where you are coming from, Elmer.  And you are probably right 
that I need to be more humble.  But after a while a guy gets tired of being 
misunderstood even though he is speaking the truth.  Speaking the truth 
should never prompt an argument and bad feelings.  When I mean to point a 
finger, and make things personal, then I'll let everyone know.  Until then 
I recommend that those who might be offended read a little more carefully 
and see if I have singled them out in mere paraphrasing the scriptures and 
the writings of the prophets.  Usually they will find that I have not.

John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
"...by proving contraries, truth is made manifest" --Joseph
Smith, History of the Church, Volume 6, p.248
***
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



RE: [ZION] When a Girl Marries

2002-12-05 Thread larry . jackson
Chet:

Just for grins, I wonder if anyone here is old enough to 
recognize the source for our subject line?

___

Must come from the famous quote by Helen Rowland:
When a girl marries, she exchanges the attentions of 
many men for the inattention of one.  [grin]

I'll leave it to you to figure out if I was actually old enough 
to remember, but I always prefered the CBS Radio Mystery 
theater over those other old radio shows, although another 
very interesting thought did cross my mind.

I wonder if there are any other radio soap operas that 
actually broadcast on all three of the major networks, 
CBS, NBC, and ABC, as that one did for 19 years.  That 
would be quite an accomplishment, almost as good as 
being on both the Red and the Blue Networks, don't you 
think?

Larry Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
After much pondering, Paul Osborne favored us with:

I look at it this way:

There are two kinds of Christians; those who have the fullness and those
who don't.

Celestial Christians = Latter-day Saints
Terrestrial Christians = Baptists, Catholics, and the rest

In this way we can believe our General Authorities when they refer to
other churches as "Christians" and still have the title of "true
Christians" all to ourselves.

How about that, JWR?


Sounds good to me.  I still prefer the terms "true Christian" and "false 
Christian."  It stirs up more discussion.


John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
At present, the Book of Mormon is studied in our Sunday
School and seminary classes every fourth year. This
four-year pattern, however, must not be followed by
Church members in their personal and family study. We
need to read daily from the pages of the book that will get
a man "nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by
any other book." (Ezra Taft Benson, October 1988)
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] Muslim Extremists

2002-12-05 Thread Marc A. Schindler
It *is* cute, but also fallacious. You can't tell in advance if an 17-40 year old
male Muslim is an extremist or not, that's the problem. This jokes takes it for
granted that extremism is what's being screened for, when it isn't. Naturally
there's an association between the two, but no causative element. There are other
extremists around, too, like the IRA.

"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

> I'm forwarding this from another list.  I thought it was pretty funny in a
> morbid sort of way.
>
> ---
> >Please pause a moment, reflect back, and take the following Multiple Choice
> >test. (The events are actual cuts from past history. They actually happened!
> >Do you remember?)
> >
> >
> >1. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:
> >a. Olga Corbitt
> >b. Sitting Bull
> >c. Arnold Schwartzeneger
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >2. In 1979, the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over by:
> >a. Lost Norwegians
> >b. Elvis
> >c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40.
> >
> >
> >3. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:
> >a. John Dillinger
> >b. The King of Sweden
> >c. The Boy Scouts
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >4. In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
> >a. A pizza delivery boy
> >b. Pee Wee Herman
> >c. Geraldo Rivera
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >5. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old
> >American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
> >a. The Smurfs
> >b. Davy Jones
> >c. The Little Mermaid
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >6. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a U.S. Navy diver
> >trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:
> >a. Captain Kid
> >b. Charles Lindberg
> >c. Mother Teresa
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >7. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
> >a. Scooby Doo
> >b. The Tooth Fairy
> >c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >8. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
> >a. Richard Simmons
> >b. Grandma Moses
> >c. Michael Jordan
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >9. In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
> >a. Mr. Rogers
> >b. Hillary, to distract attention from Wild Bill' s women problems
> >c. The World Wrestling Federation
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >10. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to
> >take
> >out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the
> >US Pentagon and the other was diverted to a crash by the passengers.
> >Thousands of people were killed by:
> >a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd
> >b. The Supreme Court of Florida
> >c. Mr. Bean
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >
> >11. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
> >a. Enron
> >b. The Lutheran Church
> >c. The NFL
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >12. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
> >a. Bonny and Clyde
> >b. Captain Kangaroo
> >c. Billy Graham
> >d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
> >
> >
> >Nope, .I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling,  do
> >you?
> >So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly muslim raghead
> >fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be
> >allowed to profile certain people. They must conduct random searches of
> >80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with
> >proper  identification, Secret
> >Service agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year-old
> >Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of  Honor winning former Governors.
>
> \\\
> To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>
> //
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick
himself up and continue on” – Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do

Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Marc A. Schindler
potential converts. :-)

"Elmer L. Fairbank" wrote:

> At 09:49 12/5/2002 -0900, BLT wondered :
>
> >For years we referred to those outside the Church as "gentiles."  Then
> >that word wasn't good enough, so we stated saying "nonmember."  Even that
> >term is considered too politically incorrect.  So what do we call them today?
>
> Lost
>
> Till the ever helpful
>
> //
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick
himself up and continue on” – Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Perhaps we need two different definitions: Christ-like, and Christian?

"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

> After much pondering, Mark Gregson favored us with:
> >What do we know about being a true Christian?  Not much, really, because
> >God has never revealed any definition for "true Christian".  He has given
> >the requirements for entering the Celestial Kingdom, however, and if you
> >want that to be your definition of "true" then fine.  It doesn't mean that
> >one is perfectly keeping all the commandments here in this life.  By the
> >revealed requirements in D&C 76 and elsewhere, there are probably very
> >many living now who qualify.
>
> This thread has gone further than I ever intended. I know there are many
> wonderful, kind, and unselfish people in the world.  I was not referring to
> them.  I was addressing those who claim that Mormons aren't Christians.
>
> For years we referred to those outside the Church as "gentiles."  Then that
> word wasn't good enough, so we stated saying "nonmember."  Even that term
> is considered too politically incorrect.  So what do we call them today?
>
> Bruce R. McConkie frequently spoke of "apostate Christendom" to refer to
> non-Mormon Christians.  He also used the word "sectarian."  I've thought
> that "potential members" might work.  How about "future
> investigators?"  Brothers and sisters might also work.  I have often
> preferred "traditional Christian" as opposed to "nontraditional Christian."
>
> But to those who want to call us a cult and say that we aren't Christians,
> I want to make it perfectly clear that it is they who are not
> Christians.  Only one church on earth teaches true Christianity, and it
> isn't the anti-Mormons or the traditional Christians that support them in
> their work.
>
> John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===
> "Atheistic humanism is the opiate of the self-described
> intellectuals" --Uncle Bob
> ===
> All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR
>
> //
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
> /
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick
himself up and continue on” – Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Paul Osborne
I look at it this way:

There are two kinds of Christians; those who have the fullness and those
who don't.

Celestial Christians = Latter-day Saints
Terrestrial Christians = Baptists, Catholics, and the rest

In this way we can believe our General Authorities when they refer to
other churches as "Christians" and still have the title of "true
Christians" all to ourselves.

How about that, JWR?

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Teaching Correct Principle

2002-12-05 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 09:13 12/5/2002 -0900, BLT wrote:


Yet almost every true idea, principle, philosophy or behavior indicts 
someone.  They take it personal.  They falsely assume that you are 
targeting them or a loved one when all you are trying to do is teach the 
correct principle.  I wish others could do as well as I do in making the 
distinction between teaching correct principle and finger pointing.  I 
guess it just takes more intelligence than most people possess.


John,

I know what you are saying and agree in principle, but please read this 
carefully and see if the phrase "puffed up with their own " in the last two sentences doesn't jump out at you?  Signaturus 
rhetoric!  Do you really feel that way?

Till the hiding under the carpet now

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 09:49 12/5/2002 -0900, BLT wondered :


For years we referred to those outside the Church as "gentiles."  Then 
that word wasn't good enough, so we stated saying "nonmember."  Even that 
term is considered too politically incorrect.  So what do we call them today?



Lost


Till the ever helpful

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] "Hell" aint cussin'!

2002-12-05 Thread Geoff FOWLER
>>> Chet favored us with the following:
>And every Protestant church I've dealt with has the 
>doctrine that True Christians will be neutered angels 
>in Heaven, with no more feeling for their spouse than 
>one would have for a faithful brother or sister.
 
If that is what they are expecting, and desire, then they'll get it.
That's the terrestrial kingdom in a nutshell!
 
I believe, however, that if they would just allow the Spirit to whisper
to their hearts how much more wonderful it would be to have their family
for eternity, then perhaps many would grasp onto that and learn of the
true Church. Ol' Scratch seems to be doing quite a number on families
these days however, and it makes it a little tougher for people to see
past their family problems and see their families for what they could
really be: a source of true happiness and joy forever.
 
Your brother,
Geoff

--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] "Hell" aint cussin'!

2002-12-05 Thread Chet

John W. Redelfs wrote:

> that hell, whatever that means, is going to be a crowded place

My understanding of Hell, as a literal place, comes from Alma Jr's 
experience while in his famous coma.  To me - and I imagine to many 
people - not being able to have their wife and children with them would 
be hell.  And every Protestant church I've dealt with has the doctrine 
that True Christians will be neutered angels in Heaven, with no more 
feeling for their spouse than one would have for a faithful brother or 
sister.  Superamalgamated bummer!

*jeep!
  --Chet
"Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you 
are doing the impossible."

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




[ZION] Me, I want a hula hoop.

2002-12-05 Thread Chet
> > Regardless, in 1836 when the revelation was given, Alvin still had not
> > been baptized

For that matter, neither had Theodore or Simon.  I'm pretty sure that 
Leonardo had been, though Clyde Crashcup had Word of Wisdom problems.

*jeep!
  --Chet
"Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you 
are doing the impossible."

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Paul Osborne
On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:11:16 -0900 "John W. Redelfs"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After much pondering, Gary Smith favored us with:
> >So, until you get your eating habit under control, you aren't 
> following
> >the D&C, and this means you aren't a true Christian because you 
> aren't
> >following the prophets? I definitely wouldn't be considered one 
> under
> >your definition, either, since there are many things I struggle 
> with and
> >do not follow perfectly.
> >
> >JWR:
> > > A Christian, by my definition, is one who follows Christ.  And 
> since it 
> > is impossible to follow Christ without following those whom Christ 
> has 
> > sent to lead, namely President Hinckley, all nonmembers and many 
> members 
> > do not qualify as true Christians. --JWR
> 
> Here you are committing two errors in your logic.  First, you are 
> taking my 
> position to an extreme that I never intended.  Second, you are 
> setting up a 
> straw man in doing so by assuming something that I never said.  I 
> never 
> said that a person had to follow the prophets perfectly to be a true 
> Christian.
> 
> When a person rejects the authorized messengers whom the Savior has 
> sent, 
> he is rejecting the Savior.  It is the same.  Who are these 
> authorize 
> messengers?  I speak of our missionaries, prophets and apostles.
> 
> John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===


Boy O boy, the Zion list is is just like them debate boards. Kind of fun
too. :-)

he he ;-)

Paul O


Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
After much pondering, Gary Smith favored us with:

You are thinking of the short mortal term we live in. All will bow the
knee and profess Christ as Lord. The majority of them will eventually
accept Christ, and though they may not merit the Celestial Kingdom, they
still will accept the gospel someday. It is just that they will not have
the ability to live all of the gospel, and so will not be celestial
material. Even we will have to go through a perfecting and learning
period before receiving godhood (DC 130). If one must be exalted before
being a true Christian, then no one (not even Christ) was a true
Christian as a mortal.


I do not believe that eventually the majority of them will accept Christ, 
nor do I believe you can establish this claim as scriptural.

On the contrary, Jesus said:

13 Enter ye in at the strait gate; for wide is the gate, and broad is the 
way, which leadeth to destruction, and many there be who go in thereat;

14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto 
life, and few there be that find it.

15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but 
inwardly they are ravening wolves. (3 Nephi 14:13-15)

How do you get "majority" from this?  It clearly says that most people will 
not find the "narrow" way that leads to life.

And if the various ministers and professional clergymen of other churches 
are not "false prophets," then who are the false prophets?

You know.  I think our disagreement on this and related issues stems from 
your desire to see everyone, or almost everyone saved.  I don't think this 
is a righteous desire.  It denies the concept of moral agency and the fact 
that many will choose the wrong.  Only when we realize that keeping the 
commandments, including baptism, is the only road to salvation, do we have 
a good reason for keeping them.

The scriptures do clearly establish that those who believe in Christ, and 
receive an authorized baptism will be "saved," and those who do not will be 
damned.  This teaching that most people will be saved is not 
scriptural.  If you think that it is, please show me your supporting 
evidence from scripture and the teachings of the modern prophets.

John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
"...by proving contraries, truth is made manifest" --Joseph
Smith, History of the Church, Volume 6, p.248
***
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] Teaching Correct Principle

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
According the Matthew 7:3, we are not to "judge" our fellow man.  And 
according the Moroni 7:15 we are commanded to judge between right and 
wrong.  This creates a problem for some who don't read carefully, or who 
jump to unwarranted conclusions about a writers intent.

We are not to judge people.  But we are supposed to judge ideas, 
principles, philosophies and behaviors.  Judging the good from the evil is 
one of the most important reasons we are in mortality.

Yet almost every true idea, principle, philosophy or behavior indicts 
someone.  They take it personal.  They falsely assume that you are 
targeting them or a loved one when all you are trying to do is teach the 
correct principle.  I wish others could do as well as I do in making the 
distinction between teaching correct principle and finger pointing.  I 
guess it just takes more intelligence than most people possess.

John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
"...by proving contraries, truth is made manifest" --Joseph
Smith, History of the Church, Volume 6, p.248
***
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Paul Osborne
"There can be no real and true Christianity, even with good works, unless
we are deeply and personally committed to the reality of Jesus Christ as
the Only Begotten Son of the Father, who bought us, who purchased us in
the great act of atonement."

Spencer W. Kimball, “The Savior—The Center of Our Lives,” Tambuli, Dec.
1979, 1

Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
After much pondering, Mark Gregson favored us with:

What do we know about being a true Christian?  Not much, really, because 
God has never revealed any definition for "true Christian".  He has given 
the requirements for entering the Celestial Kingdom, however, and if you 
want that to be your definition of "true" then fine.  It doesn't mean that 
one is perfectly keeping all the commandments here in this life.  By the 
revealed requirements in D&C 76 and elsewhere, there are probably very 
many living now who qualify.

This thread has gone further than I ever intended. I know there are many 
wonderful, kind, and unselfish people in the world.  I was not referring to 
them.  I was addressing those who claim that Mormons aren't Christians.

For years we referred to those outside the Church as "gentiles."  Then that 
word wasn't good enough, so we stated saying "nonmember."  Even that term 
is considered too politically incorrect.  So what do we call them today?

Bruce R. McConkie frequently spoke of "apostate Christendom" to refer to 
non-Mormon Christians.  He also used the word "sectarian."  I've thought 
that "potential members" might work.  How about "future 
investigators?"  Brothers and sisters might also work.  I have often 
preferred "traditional Christian" as opposed to "nontraditional Christian."

But to those who want to call us a cult and say that we aren't Christians, 
I want to make it perfectly clear that it is they who are not 
Christians.  Only one church on earth teaches true Christianity, and it 
isn't the anti-Mormons or the traditional Christians that support them in 
their work.

John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
"Atheistic humanism is the opiate of the self-described
intellectuals" --Uncle Bob
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



[ZION] Muslim Extremists

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
I'm forwarding this from another list.  I thought it was pretty funny in a 
morbid sort of way.

---
Please pause a moment, reflect back, and take the following Multiple Choice
test. (The events are actual cuts from past history. They actually happened!
Do you remember?)


1. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:
a. Olga Corbitt
b. Sitting Bull
c. Arnold Schwartzeneger
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


2. In 1979, the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over by:
a. Lost Norwegians
b. Elvis
c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40.


3. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:
a. John Dillinger
b. The King of Sweden
c. The Boy Scouts
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


4. In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
a. A pizza delivery boy
b. Pee Wee Herman
c. Geraldo Rivera
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


5. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old
American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
a. The Smurfs
b. Davy Jones
c. The Little Mermaid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


6. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a U.S. Navy diver
trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:
a. Captain Kid
b. Charles Lindberg
c. Mother Teresa
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


7. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
a. Scooby Doo
b. The Tooth Fairy
c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


8. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
a. Richard Simmons
b. Grandma Moses
c. Michael Jordan
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


9. In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
a. Mr. Rogers
b. Hillary, to distract attention from Wild Bill' s women problems
c. The World Wrestling Federation
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


10. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to 
take
out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the
US Pentagon and the other was diverted to a crash by the passengers.
Thousands of people were killed by:
a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd
b. The Supreme Court of Florida
c. Mr. Bean
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40



11. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
a. Enron
b. The Lutheran Church
c. The NFL
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


12. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
a. Bonny and Clyde
b. Captain Kangaroo
c. Billy Graham
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40


Nope, .I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling,  do 
you?
So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly muslim raghead
fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be
allowed to profile certain people. They must conduct random searches of
80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with 
proper  identification, Secret
Service agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year-old
Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of  Honor winning former Governors.

\\\
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Elmer L. Fairbank
At 08:37 12/5/2002 -0900, BLT scares us all:


--- Mark Gregson ---
Joseph Smith had the vision in 1836 in the Kirtland temple.  In the
vision he saw his father, mother and Alvin in the celestial kingdom.
However, his father and mother were still alive when Joseph Smith had the
vision.  Therefore, the vision was of the future, after Alvin's temple
work would have been completed.  No one enters the Celestial Kingdom
without baptism if they die after reaching the age of accountability.


In my view, Mark is right.  And Gary is still determined to avoid that 
fact that hell, whatever that means, is going to be a crowded place since 
"few" will find the narrow way that leads to life.


Oh, man, I HATE crowds.  Guess I'd better get busy.


Till the scurrying

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
--- Gary Smith ---

Regardless, in 1836 when the revelation was given, Alvin still had not
been baptized, but was considered by God good enough to be in a vision of
the Celestial Kingdom. This tells me that the man was accepted as a
'true' Christian.

--- Mark Gregson ---
Joseph Smith had the vision in 1836 in the Kirtland temple.  In the
vision he saw his father, mother and Alvin in the celestial kingdom.
However, his father and mother were still alive when Joseph Smith had the
vision.  Therefore, the vision was of the future, after Alvin's temple
work would have been completed.  No one enters the Celestial Kingdom
without baptism if they die after reaching the age of accountability.


In my view, Mark is right.  And Gary is still determined to avoid that fact 
that hell, whatever that means, is going to be a crowded place since "few" 
will find the narrow way that leads to life.

John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
"...by proving contraries, truth is made manifest" --Joseph
Smith, History of the Church, Volume 6, p.248
***
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Mark Gregson

> Regardless, in 1836 when the revelation was given, Alvin still had not
> been baptized, but was considered by God good enough to be in a vision of
> the Celestial Kingdom. This tells me that the man was accepted as a
> 'true' Christian.

I have no idea what God condsiders a true Christian (or rather, how "true" one has to 
be before one is "true enough").

Alvin was clearly a very good man.  He believed Joseph Smith and encouraged him.  
Nonetheless your logic does not follow.  The vision was of the future.  If you saw a 
currently wicked person in a vision in the Celestial Kingdom would you say that they 
were a sufficiently good Christian?  No, you would say that the person will repent 
sometime in the future and thus be admitted.  Clearly, what Joseph Smith saw coupled 
with other revelation shows that Alvin would be admitted to the Celestial Kingdom 
because he was righteous _and_ someone would do his temple work.

What do we know about being a true Christian?  Not much, really, because God has never 
revealed any definition for "true Christian".  He has given the requirements for 
entering the Celestial Kingdom, however, and if you want that to be your definition of 
"true" then fine.  It doesn't mean that one is perfectly keeping all the commandments 
here in this life.  By the revealed requirements in D&C 76 and elsewhere, there are 
probably very many living now who qualify.

=  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =


-- 
___
Get your free email from http://mymail.operamail.com

Powered by Outblaze

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread John W. Redelfs
After much pondering, Gary Smith favored us with:

So, until you get your eating habit under control, you aren't following
the D&C, and this means you aren't a true Christian because you aren't
following the prophets? I definitely wouldn't be considered one under
your definition, either, since there are many things I struggle with and
do not follow perfectly.

JWR:
> A Christian, by my definition, is one who follows Christ.  And since it 
is impossible to follow Christ without following those whom Christ has 
sent to lead, namely President Hinckley, all nonmembers and many members 
do not qualify as true Christians. --JWR

Here you are committing two errors in your logic.  First, you are taking my 
position to an extreme that I never intended.  Second, you are setting up a 
straw man in doing so by assuming something that I never said.  I never 
said that a person had to follow the prophets perfectly to be a true Christian.

When a person rejects the authorized messengers whom the Savior has sent, 
he is rejecting the Savior.  It is the same.  Who are these authorize 
messengers?  I speak of our missionaries, prophets and apostles.

John W. Redelfs   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
"A liberal in the Church is merely one who does not have
a testimony."  --President Harold B. Lee
===
All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^



RE: [ZION] Two Towers

2002-12-05 Thread Chet

Gary Smith wrote:
> The only one I'm aware of is the Back to the Future Series. Episodes 2
> and 3 were made simultaneously.  However, they aren't as complicated as
> the LOTR, and they only did two episodes at once, not all three.

Same thing with *the Three Musketeers* and *the Four Musketeers* which 
were shot simultaneously (though further shooting was later 
accomplished, and lots of remixing).  Superman 1 & 2 (really 4 & 5 since 
there were three Superman movies in the 1940s & 1950s, but I digress) 
were shot simultaneously, but then the Saalkinds fired Richard Donner 
and Richard Lester reshot most of Superman 2, making it more comical.  
(Did the Saalkinds have a policy of hiring only directors named 
"Richard"?)


*jeep!
  --Chet
"Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you 
are doing the impossible."

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] True Christians

2002-12-05 Thread Chet

Gary Smith wrote:
> So, until you get your eating habit under control, you aren't following
> the D&C, and this means you aren't a true Christian because you aren't
> following the prophets? I definitely wouldn't be considered one under
> your definition, either, since there are many things I struggle with and
> do not follow perfectly. 

I didn't see anything in John's definition indicating a true Christian 
follows Christ and those he sends PERFECTLY.  By definition, a Christian 
is a sinner in need of repentance -- but is a person who recognizes 
their imperiled condition and admits it.  But a true Christian DOES need 
to follow Christ, no matter how weakly or how often he/she falls down 
and has to be helped up again.

A not-so-true Christian would profess to follow Christ and then not even 
try to follow him or those he sends.  A not-so-true would even reject 
many of the words of Christ, ignoring those which are too difficult for 
whatever reason.  A not-so-true (I may have coined a new and useful term 
here) would certainly be more concerned about social pressures than 
about following the fullness of the gospel.

Here's a wonderful example:  my mother-in-law is one of the most 
wonderful people God ever sent to Earth.  She has suffered much (mostly 
due to here LOUSY choices in husbands) and has given much.  She has a 
firm belief in the Book of Mormon and a testimony that his church is 
true.  But for the past 12 years, she has not joined the church.  
Initially, it was because her then-husband threatened her and the bishop 
with his pistol.  Since then, it's been because it would be bad for 
business, her other daughter (Cherie's sister) would have a hard time 
with it, etc, etc, etc.

Ma certainly loves Christ.  But she doesn't love him enough to sacrifice 
All Things.  Does this make her a Christian who avoids hard doctrine (as 
many did who fell away from Jesus when he preached hard doctrine)?  Does 
this make her a not-so-true Christian?

What about Latter-day Saints who are not willing to sacrifice All 
Things?

What if Abraham had not been willing to sacrifice All Things?

It's tough, this "following Christ" thing.  Even his apostles kept 
falling asleep on the job.  

And I really can't see how one can follow Christ and reject him when his 
teachings get too tough and still consider oneself a Christian.  But I 
don't have to figure that out (though it puzzles me) because that's NOT 
MY JOB.  I have too much concern about following him myself, and 
following whenever I come across hard doctrine which requires sacrifice 
or which I don't understand.


*jeep!
  --Chet
"Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you 
are doing the impossible."

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] When a Girl Marries

2002-12-05 Thread Chet

Jon Spencer wrote:
> Now this really IS wonderful.  Thanks for a great start to my day (well, 
> I
> taught seminary today, so a great continuation!).  And I don't see any
> flames.
> 
> Jon

Thank you, Jon.  We're still kinda floating around in clouds from it 
all.

Just for grins, I wonder if anyone here is old enough to recognize the 
source for our subject line?

*jeep!
  --Chet
"Start by doing what's necessary, then what's possible, and suddenly you 
are doing the impossible."

//
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^