the object through
remoting, but a wrapper that makes sure that the necessary locks are
obeyed.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET
Ryan, no clue what you talk about.
Frans referred to the ASP.NET intrinsic output cache that - to my
knowledge - works together with the IIS 6 output caching mechanism.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message
clarification?
The part which makes you post on a .NET Mailing list with prolems that
are related purely to your choice of NOT using .NET.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
===
This list is hosted
We need more infor for this.
Can you publicsh the relevant method signatures?
I can confirm that the object SHOULD not be serialized - that is, unelss
you reference the object anywhere in the event parameters, naturally.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET
Sure.
Our EntityBeroker and EVERY O/R-Mapper that is not total bullshit do
habve their own query subsystems, you know :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET
.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Softare Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
SUBSCRIBE DOTNET-CLR Girikrishna Tirumala
Sent: Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 08:32
the LOC count you have to manually
handle.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shawn Wildermuth
Sent: Freitag
.
Thomas Tomiczek
[EMAIL PROTECTED
What good would this be, given that methods are not evaluated by the
XmlSerializer?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
was taklking of the current 1.1 version of the .net
framework. Which - is something we all would love to be pushed out
further by Microsoft and which is NOT beta software.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stevens
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 10:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Large solutions and references
so based on a working month
. Sets do not have an intrinsic sort order.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
Jon Stonecash
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested
I would say he means the windows scheduler. This is apart of the
operating system, you know.
http://www.iopus.com/guides/winscheduler.htm for a beginner intro into
this part of Windows XP.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd
that this is a public forum.
-cv
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thomas Tomiczek
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET
to the end user, where this may be still wrong).
As you said, Latin1_General_CI_AS seems to be about the best you can get
your hands on. Be happy you have not to present anything to the user at
the same time.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Baudouin, Andrew
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and
SQL Server
Right, he only
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frans Bouma
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 17:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Common Sort Order for .NET and
SQL Server
So what?
The
You need to return a HTML page that then has a request string in an IMG
element.
This way you force this to be opened in the browser.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion
NOT solve the 10 requests concurrent
issue. In any real stress test you WILL hit this.
Is there any way to get a decent stress test going?
No per definition. Use a server.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
I've looked in the archives
Can it rech the asp.net .js file? Or dies it get an error doing so
(especially an access denied error?)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto
Well, this is your error then, isn't it?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Puneet Jain
Sent: Montag, 7. Juni
.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Srihari Angaluri
Sent: Samstag, 22. Mai 2004 04:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It is a value type.
But I think MS assumes that the function calls will be inlined anyway,
and the no copy ends up on the stack.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced
optimizations (that are also not really wanted).
Has anyone a clue whether there may be a reason they are not defined as ref?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL
Taken
But in this particular case, being heavy matrix opreations in 3d, this
kills your performance.
Purity is nice, but here we talk of criticals, too.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated
Copy, unless the parameter is passed by reference.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.nET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arlie Davis
Sent: Sonntag
Isn't there a WMI integration where you can see the queue and it's
parameters?
Should be.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Thomas Tomiczek wrote:
This would speed things a lot, especially for enterprise
development.
Possibly.
But only if you like extremely idiotic surfaces.
Oh, I think that's a little harsh... You can do a lot in
browser applications these days that was previously only
possible
Hmpf.
::I assume that this works since the enum value is boxed and unboxed to
an int.
Wrong. It works because enums CAN be cast to their primitive type.
Boxing never enters the equation here.
What you ask for is legal - by design.
Reference: Language specification.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA
the worst of both worlds. Just will not work.
Wishfull thinking.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Seref Arikan
Sent
Hm, but this would totally take out the integral sort, right?
I mean, the IBindingList sort mechanisms have no provisions for multi column sort (at
least none I am aware of).
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
-Original Message
There is no cleaner or different way for one simple reason:
Compatibility with ActiveX components.
They require STA and they limit the whole thing to this type of message
pump.
Now, dropping them is not an option, too. A lot depends on this model.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd
INVOKE the message call back onto the STA thread :-)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Foderick
Sent: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2004 02:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Call STA
.
There is no need to centralize the application layer if you do not want
ti. All it takes is some work.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
(CTO PowerNodes Ltd.)
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http
Don't books have a UPC (Universal Product Code), too?
This would be a little more detailed than an ISDN.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
must do
something with the data on the transfer.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dotnetminer
Sent: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2003 06:34
To: [EMAIL
= Enumname.ToGenericInt(enumvalue)
:-) Just in case someone at MS reads this. Right now I have to put all
these little methods into external utility methods.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics
it, his arguments are more
than valid.
But I would say: fix the infrastructure, isntead of working around the
symptoms.
We do it because we need it for our business object infrastructure and
O/R mapper - basically providing this as a service.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consuling Ltd.
(Microsoft
Look at how ASP.NET works.
ASP.NET also has only a limited number of threads, and still it manages
to handl way more connnected clients.
The same principles apply with remoting.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET
-Original Message-
From: Moderated
for us.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damien Guard
Sent: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 12:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
the object
when thre is a cached instance. And this the weak reference tells you.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consuting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can not know. The GC does not know either, until it runs. Rooting
information is not tracked during program execution.
What do you try to achieve?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced
)
* Search engines
Etc.
Don't assume he does not care about scalability JUST becase he optimises
one computer scenarios.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Software Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
Does not totally fit it. Still, here is our scenario:
* We have one outer class, derived from an abstract base class. NO
commin interface etc. with the contained stuff.
* The outer class contains a ton of stubs.
* For every stub there is a separate class that contains a derived
class.
* There
Documentation for this anywhere?
Especially on HOW they stop the boxing to happen.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Frijters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Montag, 16. Juni 2003 11:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Well, no clue about speed, BUT memory wise:
The DataSet (above an XML document) is built on top o fan
XmlDataDocument DOM like presentation, so it uses more memory than the
DOM presentation.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message
.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
Not possible to my knowledge.
What COULD work is that the type implements cutom type and returns an instance of the
attribute when asked for - BUT - the normal mechanism uses reflection, and it is not
possible to add an attribute to this at runtime.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting
not to be acceptable.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Schmied Fabian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Montag, 24. März 2003 13:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Adding a custom attribute to a type
You
-consulting.com/ is a starting point. Look for the
EntityBroker.
Besides this there area couple of source generators outside.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Luca Minudel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mittwoch, 12. Februar
Speed depends on usage pattern. Basically - it depends on how you use
the objects. With MBR every access goes through remoting, with
MarhalByValue you get local copies - which sometimes is not what you
want.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original
There is also the question of how much overhead a TCP connection
imposes. Even localhost, and even not hirtting the wire - will the
stream not be encoded into TCP packets?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kloosterman
Not to my knowledge - I rembmer having heard in some discussion that
this was left out due to time or resource constraints. Not ure bout .NET
1.1.
Again, this is hearsay - not sure either.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From
), but this does not
work - I get an exception later when baking the type that not everything
is implemented.
My question - do I REALLY have to emit bytecode for tboth, the abstract
class property AND the interface property? Or is there an easier way?
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd
are not too likely to exploit the newest vulnerability -
this is normally left to hackers knowing their stuff).
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Craft, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:45 PM
is
actually going on.
Script kiddies are normally attacking on well known exploits, and can
normally be kept off guard by basically changing a smal implementation
detail and/or having competent administrators.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read
thing that you can actually have - much worse than not
having an algorythm at all, because then you KNOW that you are
unprotected.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hopper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
by the hundreds.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
--
Still writing SQL and dealing with DataSets?
Why dont you use our EntityBroker.
The most advanced o/r and business object toolkit in town.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Sells [mailto:csells
an Idisposable
implementing style call the correct addref/release functions on the
Idisposable method (compiler injection) and you are combining both
advantages.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
--
Still writing SQL and dealing with DataSets?
Why dont you
Inline - and sometimes not funny :-)
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
--
Still writing SQL and dealing with DataSets?
Why dont you use our EntityBroker.
The most advanced o/r and business object toolkit in town.
-Original Message-
From
Not that I know.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Turneral [mailto:Alex;INSYSTEK.COM]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 17:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] .NET CLR network limit?
Running a single app with 5
been modified?
I assume it is not trivial - maybe it is simply technical, but IMHO you
get a lot of points where you have the signature as an important part
(like linking into the GAC), and so it might be a LOT of things to
modify.
Let me second this question - anyone has any metrics?
Thomas
!= IntPtr.Zero) Marshal.FreeCoTaskMem(pPinArray); }
// Do something with the array
...
Hope this works (and helps)!
-Andy Hopper
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:ADVANCED-DOTNET;DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM] On Behalf Of Thomas
Tomiczek
Sent: Monday, October 14
in pinArray is big enough? I
mean, if I work with my unmanaged code blocks, then he has no choice,
but here - he can hardly know where the stuff is written in the croutine
called.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hopper
Thats not really an option. I do this right now, enforcing the class to
be abstract and generating a subclass - thats what I want to get rid of
:-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Whittington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
even
with very low security rights, to my knowledge - the resulting code just
needs to pass the verifier.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Clemens F. Vasters [mailto:clemensv;NEWTELLIGENCE.COM]
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2002 14:37
will HAVE to use weak references for your collection. Thats the way
it is designed.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Christian Schmitz [mailto:csh;GEDAS.DE]
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. Oktober 2002 15:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED
strongly suggest we restart
with a new email after this run :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Healy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 21:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Strongly
:
at ThonaConsulting.DirectShow.IEnumPins.Next(Int32 cPins, IPin[]
ppPins, Int32 pcFetched)
at
ThonaConsulting.DirectShow.Utilities.FilterUtility.GetPin(IBaseFilter
Filter, PinDirection Direction) in
c:\work\thonaconsulting\directshow\thonaconsulting.directshow\utilities\
filterutility.cs:line 29
Any clues?
Thomas Tomiczek
One moment :-)
Means that param 0 contains the size, right? Which is correct - param 2 is the number
of objects returned.
Hm, so much for borrowed code :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Mattias Sjögren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
What about using a REF array, instead of an int?
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Richard Birkby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 17:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] FW: Interop
Well, just one question - how do you handly type inheritance in this
dataset?
I mean, a typed dataset is typed, or? No subtypes per table depending on
data.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kloosterman [mailto:[EMAIL
work is interesting - we go in different directions,
but your steps make PERFECT sense in the context of the way you are
going to :-)
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kloosterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 10
,
then after all inserts, before the original updates, the value is
updates.
As a result (of this which we could not easily do with datasets) we can
automatically store arbitrary object graphs :-)
No, DataSets were decided to be part of the problem.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C
by attributes). DataSet: By hand. You
losse.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
in advance.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
- for perofrmance
reasons etc. the last example is doing some work under the scenes.
c2.ParticleData and c2.ParticleData are actually shortcuts for going two
level deep into storage hierarchy :-) Every container with data in it
is actually three tables (with three objects).
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting
way to
find this out without access to the ID`?) to the return type.
*** Thanks.
...
For more detail, see COM Interop Part 1: C# Client Tutorial in the
MSDN library.
*** Yes, thanks :-) tel me I am a beginner here :-) No, really -
thanks.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C
) goes through flawlessly.
Code of the DataSink can be published in full if someone wants to have a
look there.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other
times, while
your C+ code has the advantage of being able to allocate the correct
size beforehand :-)
That's NOT a comparable benchmark :-)
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Yogesh Shetty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
memory is
correct right now (and .NET threads are assigned OS threads, don't
forget this) 1MB per thread. Thanks for blowing 300 Mb for nothing so
far :-)
More inline...
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: Mcmullan, Andy (Andrew
them. Use pooled database connections.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-
From: David Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sonntag, 30. Juni 2002 22:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Massive Use of Threads Issue
83 matches
Mail list logo
