It seems like there wouldn't be a good way to guarantee that the funds
couldn't be used for whatever they want. If they're getting "free" money to
build out their network, then the funds that they previously would have
used for that purpose can now be used for said Ferrari, etc.
IMO there are
I wish somebody would grow the ditchweed by today's standards that I smoked
in high school. This stuff today is actual drugs. How's about you apply to
be a niche grower. Could be wireless beehighve ditchweed
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 7:06 PM wrote:
> I seriously considered trying for a license to
Live presenters, having definitive answers to caveat questions in real
time. People in the room that are answering questions are probably on first
name basis with people from winnforum.
I'm not sure how limited the icd folks are with their NDAs but I hope they
can soon speak to the installation
I'm betting CEO bonuses weren't an eligible expense for CAF, but I
couldn't say for sure.
Even if these scenarios went exactly as described, I'm not entirely sure
what the logical conclusion we're supposed to draw is. Is it "Frontier
used public funds inappropriately, therefore we should not
Well, the WISPs like Amplex that did ICD are several steps ahead of the rest of
us. But they probably have some bruises to show for it.
I went through the first module of the Cambium online course. It’s OK, not
great, either it’s not the same as what you took, or the live presenter adds a
Frontier - took CAF funding.
CEO took huge payouts
CEO buys Ferrari
Frontier - Declares bankruptcy
Limitless Mobile - gets 35 million
Builds multi county “rural” broadband network in the most populated areas of
the counties.
Promptly declares bankruptcy
> On Jan 30, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Adam
From FCC announcement Re: RDOF:
The first phase of the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund will begin later this
year and target census blocks that are wholly unserved with fixed broadband at
speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps. This phase would make available up to $16 billion
to census blocks where
I believe it's a bit closer to 67%.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Radabaugh"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 1:49:49 PM
Subject:
I am quite sure I received it, but I keep my old texts to a minimum so I can’t
verity that.
Sorry, not much help
David Coudron
From: AF On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 5:03 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CPI training & exam
any of you
The SAS is the winnforum database, as I understand it the administrators
just input the data, SAS does the math and does the grants, not the
administrators. Market will be extras like predictions, real time CBRS
propagation mapping and visibility. Path profiling. Cambium does them
virtual cbsd so
Well, you could buy Constellation Brands, maker of Corona beer.
According to the Internet, it either causes or cures the coronavirus. So it
could go up or down. Apparently they are also in the marijuana business.
From: AF On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020
Yeah, just gonna let it ride. Hopefully I get to keep most of it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 30, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
>
> You haven't gotten lucky yet unless you sold.
>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:31 PM wrote:
>> My FXAIX index fund YTD is 31.4%
>>
>> S 500 is
I’ve got requests into a couple of the SAS choices asking why are you the best
choice. The “choose wisely” thing puts some pressure on. Also makes you think
about what happens if there’s a shakeout. With 4 now and more in the pipeline,
it’s possible some of the spaghetti won’t stick to the
You haven't gotten lucky yet unless you sold.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:31 PM wrote:
> My FXAIX index fund YTD is 31.4%
>
> S 500 is 22%
>
> Of course a correction is coming, it always does, but it has been a great
> year.
>
> I was too chicken to buy Tesla. 185 back in May. 643 today.
> --
>
Cambium does it all for you. you turn up CBRS in Cnmaestro, then select the
SAS administrator. You get 1 bill, then they pay the administrator. You
still get an account to interact directly with the administrator. They very
much stress to choose wisely upfront, changing administrators mid stream
Specifically for Cambium and cnMaestro as a Domain Proxy, I’m still a little
unclear if we first establish an account with one of the SAS vendors. Or just
select one as part of switching cnMaestro cloud to CBRS mode. Cambium collects
the money from us and pays the SAS vendor, so I’m assuming
Good ole Ernie. Our desks are about six feet as part.
Either of us can certainly help out.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:40 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> I deal with Ernie Gibson egibson at comsearch dot com He is all about
> getting you info and in the right email chain. They have so many cost
>
any of you guys who did CPI having problems receiving the text message?
They said i need to be able to receive international texts, i didnt eve
know that was a thing
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 8:21 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> CPNI vs. CPI
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
We've seen that too, running an (industrial) 120v garage door opener,
pulled one leg out of phase/voltage enough with the starting current
that the control board shutdown the generator (15kw diesel). It ran a
5ton 240v AC unit cycling on and off just fine.
On 1/30/2020 4:49 PM, Adam Moffett
Using 240V AC may help with that.
We had trouble where the generator had way more load on one hot leg than
the other. It ran rough and stalled often.
On 1/30/2020 5:14 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
The only reason you might have trouble is the air conditioning
starting load. I have seen them
I deal with Ernie Gibson egibson at comsearch dot com He is all about
getting you info and in the right email chain. They have so many cost
effective services for our industry. Theyre also working up some CBRS
planning that seems like it will be beneficial, especially if you are
thinking you might
I can’t speak for the other SAS providers, but I can definitely affirm that
CommScope is working directly with licensees.
If you’d like to discuss further feel free to contact me or any of the reps
here at Comsearch/CommScope.
Eric dot Nielsen at CommScope dot com
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM
the online will probably be good, but nothing beats the direct Q with
ones that know. they are in on the upcoming Alpha Wireless webinar
https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_aOHF6vjDT8mEiCTd-U6jHA I dont know how
cambium centric it is going to be or who from cambium will be there. But
theyre about
The only reason you might have trouble is the air conditioning starting load.
I have seen them cause a generator to stall and die before.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 30, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Josh Baird wrote:
>
>
> We're shopping for a generator for one of our larger POP's. The electrical
The best independent analysis of Starlink I've seen are the papers and
simulations by Mark Handley at University College London:
http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/starlink/
My take is Musk can fund the whole thing on low latency alone. This 14
minute video (which leverages Mark Handley's data and
Federated will ask for an NDA then eventually tell you that they will only
work with equipment manufacturers or if you have a pile of mobile
subscribers. These SAS providers are really only interested in dealing
directly with manufacturers.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 3:02 PM Matt Hoppes <
They posted an online course, I need to go check if it's the same thing.
Trying to do about 10 CBRS related things in parallel here.
I doubt the online course has sandwiches though. BYOS.
Original Message
From: "Steve Jones" thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
Sent: 1/30/2020 3:46:08 PM
To:
tell cambium matt to do another CBRS session
get pitchforks and torches and go to his office
Im telling you guys, its good stuff
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:24 PM Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> yes. As long as the SM can hear (and is set to listen to the frequency,
> bandwidth, and color code) it
We have VFIAX, which is the Vanguard equivalent to that. The
snapshot of both FXAIX and VFIAX are indistinguishable from each
other (other than the $ values).
bp
On 1/30/2020 12:30 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com
wrote:
A clever enough cheater will always find a way to cheat, but you can't
make it too easy.
For NY BPO "Connect NY" there was physical verification that each piece
of equipment you bought actually existed somewhere.whether in the
field or in storage. The auditor seemed satisfied with a list
of
> stuff give me some advice here? Will this generator support our load and
> not fall over?
>
> Thanks!
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/private/af_af.afmug.com/attachments/20200130/2f64250
FXAIX is an index fund. It's supposed to track the S 500, but it
appears to have a disconnect of sorts.
bp
On 1/30/2020 12:48 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 1/30/20 12:30 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
My FXAIX index fund YTD is 31.4%
S 500 is 22%
Of course a correction is coming, it always does,
I haven't seen anything either regarding inter satellite links. The lasers
they were going to use weren't burning up when the sats came down, so it
had a non probable chance of hitting and killing someone. The only info
again we have is from twitter posts and they claim they're trying again
late
We're shopping for a generator for one of our larger POP's. The electrical
contractor is recommending this:
https://www.generac.com/all-products/generators/home-backup-generators/guardian-series/22kw-7043-whole-house-switch-wifi-enabled
This would be supporting 4 30A circuits (powering 4 APC
Except that there IS auditing now... and we DO end up with this exact
scenario happening currently. It's not stopping it.
On 1/30/20 4:08 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I'd rather not stress over audits, but auditing is a necessary evil
IMO. If there were no auditing then there's someone, somewhere
The only thing I saw was that the initial 60 had no inter-sat
link whatever, and that the ones following that had something
different, but not the optical. I could easily be fantasizing it,
but something between nothing and optical is some kind of RF.
Perhaps
One thing I'd want the program managers to incorporate is an idea that
there are rules and there are rules. You should be able to request a
waiver on anything. There maybe be things they won't budge on, but
other areas where they should be flexible if it makes sense. For
example, if you
Yeah I know for sure you can hit the reboot button in the GUI and it won’t
drop power. Had to do that when the GLASSNOS rollover happened 1/1/20. It
just reboot’s the control interface.
Forest had done a really nice job with the product. It’s awesome having
clean cabinets!!
-Sean
On Thu, Jan
On 1/30/20 12:30 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
My FXAIX index fund YTD is 31.4%
S 500 is 22%
Of course a correction is coming, it always does, but it has been a
great year.
I was too chicken to buy Tesla. 185 back in May. 643 today.
I bought a couple shares in June. Kinda thinking about
If they had RF inter satellite links there would be a license for that and
I haven't seen one. Could have missed it. Anyone see anything?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:16 PM wrote:
> I believe they are using lasers derived from shark eyes. Those work
> better in space.
>
> *From:* Mark Radabaugh
My FXAIX index fund YTD is 31.4%
S 500 is 22%
Of course a correction is coming, it always does, but it has been a great year.
I was too chicken to buy Tesla. 185 back in May. 643 today. --
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
yes. As long as the SM can hear (and is set to listen to the frequency,
bandwidth, and color code) it will work.
Mark
> On Jan 30, 2020, at 2:49 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Will the SM scan for CBRS and NN mode with one driver loaded?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct:
I believe they are using lasers derived from shark eyes. Those work better in
space.
From: Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:49 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Now there are ~~ 180
Speed of light in glass varies but it’s about 80% of
I know a local company that got 35 million and declared bankrupcy after
putting in the last tower... days after.
So I guess that auditing is working well?
On 1/30/20 12:48 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I would disagree on the financials. A copy of good financials, even 5
years worth, gives
I just tried the 16.2 beta FW on my first guinea pig AP and SM. Not CBRS, just
the firmware upgrade. (Still haven’t chosen a SAS.)
>From Cambium’s warnings about not working with any other versions of FW, I
>expected it would be necessary to do the SMs first and that I would lose
Speed of light in glass varies but it’s about 80% of vacuum. Density matters!
Or is it matter makes density? If your dense does it matter? If you're not
matter does that give you energy?
Mark
> On Jan 30, 2020, at 2:45 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> I think he means bandwidth as opposed
Will the SM scan for CBRS and NN mode with one driver loaded?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:48 PM Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> One very nice feature of the Cambium solution is (with some caveats) you
> can
Hundreds or thousands of LEO satellites with laserbeams between them, sounds
very Buck Rogers.
I assume they have it all worked out, but it’s hard to believe that is
possible, reliable, and safe. Maybe they can deploy the Arc Net Shield while
they’re at it.
From: AF On Behalf Of
One very nice feature of the Cambium solution is (with some caveats) you can
just turn off CBRS mode in the AP and all the SM’s go back to normal NN
licensed operation.
The caveats: You have to have the frequencies, channel widths, color codes,
etc. enabled in the SM’s for them to be able
I think he means bandwidth as opposed to "speed". Surely latency
would be almost indistinguishable. However, there could be a lot
of difference in the bandwidth. Regardless of the sat-to-sat
speed, the downlink/uplink will still be the gating factor.
bp
In a vacuum it should be the same.
From: can...@believewireless.net
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:36 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Now there are ~~ 180
What's the difference in speed between the laser and RF links?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:40 AM
What's the difference in speed between the laser and RF links?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:40 AM Bill Prince wrote:
> Not what I read. The early sats (the ones other than the first 60) do not
> have the laser communications between them, but they do have an RF link
> between them. They are
I bit the bullet this morning and upgraded one with 4 AP's and 95 subs on
it. It rebooted quickly without tripping anything. That's a nice feature.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 1:22 PM Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 1/30/20 8:09 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
> > I've created two different tickets via their
On 1/30/20 8:09 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
I've created two different tickets via their support page but never
received a confirmation or any indication of a successful submission. I
assumed it was broken. However, I believe you are correct about it not
creating an outage. I just wanted
I see there’s a beta 4 release today. Haven’t read the release notes yet.
From: AF On Behalf Of Sean Heskett
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 12:24 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CBRS SAS options from Cambium
We also found a big with one Medusa AP that
We also found a big with one Medusa AP that wouldn’t get sync even tho the
sync status showed cambium sync and timing port sync. Solution was to turn
on ‘auto-sync + free-run’ and then also enable ‘free run before gps sync’
still working with cambium on a better fix but it’s working for now.
On
It has bugs, that’s for sure - but it’s workable.
Turn off ‘spectrum scan on startup’ if you enable CBSD. It goes into an
endless loop in this beta. That’s probably the worst bug we have found.
Mark
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
22690 Pemberville Rd
Luckey, OH 43443
419-261-5996
> On Jan 30, 2020,
I would disagree on the financials. A copy of good financials, even 5 years
worth, gives you a very clear picture as to the health of your company.
If they are handing out public money (not really sure as to the source of
funds, if USF generated it is not truly public money), they have a
Odd. I just reached out to the SAS team and told them to contact you ASAP.
Out of curiosity, who did you try contacting at CommScope?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:38 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Has anyone actually gotten signed up? Google has a very long drawn
Has anyone actually gotten signed up? Google has a very long drawn out
procedure and a $5k deposit requirement. No one from Commscope will
contact me. working on Federated now.
On 1/27/20 3:01 PM, Eric Nielsen wrote:
The FCC just certified the first round of SAS providers - CommScope,
Here's my dream "funding process".
I've seen too much money used for things that didn't end up being the
projected end-goal.
Company must have been in existence for 5 years. Company must show
competency and growth organically. Company must show business plan
that will work (no fluff.. an
I think it’s a confusing landscape to navigate and small operators sort of give
up because:
1. We can’t afford to dedicate an employee to checking all the boxes and doing
all the steps year round to MAYBE get funded.
2. Regulations favor larger carriers with more wherewithal, which is the same
Still working on migration so I will know soon..
I just wanted to re validate each site we onboard before doing so
because I dont want to have to go back for incorrect information.
We have had an NN license since 2010 and since the first cambium pmp450
3.65 we have been on board for this but
I am just saying that RLECs always have a winning situation with CAF.
Price caps will benefit by helping to pay for OSP but it does not guarantee
that there is a rate of return.
Some times they are under compliance deadlines and a CAF award would reduce
their cost of compliance.
Verizon did most of the CAF stuff around here. I don't usually think of
them as a "rural" LEC. But I suppose with dozens of corporate entities
under their name they can be whatever type of LEC they feel like being
today.
On 1/30/2020 11:47 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Yes, more specifically
Yes, more specifically non price cap LEC or RLEC.
Even better if they are a non ACAM RLEC.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:37 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CAF-II lack of bidders?
So basically CAF bidder == LEC?
On 1/30/2020
So basically CAF bidder == LEC?
On 1/30/2020 11:25 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
That is why the system only works for regulated rate of return
carriers. They don't have to make the normal business case pencil out
because they are guaranteed to cover their costs and get a return on
the
Interested to know what folks are doing or planning to do who have Cambium PMP
450 3.65 equipment in the field. It is our understanding that Cambium is the
only SAS option we have due to the need to have cnMaestro be the Domain Proxy
for the SAS. Has anyone got this up and working? We
That is why the system only works for regulated rate of return carriers.
They don't have to make the normal business case pencil out because they are
guaranteed to cover their costs and get a return on the investment.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hoppes
Sent: Thursday, January 30,
I've created two different tickets via their support page but never
received a confirmation or any indication of a successful submission. I
assumed it was broken. However, I believe you are correct about it not
creating an outage. I just wanted someone who's done it to confirm.
On Thu, Jan 30,
I’m 99% sure it doesn’t cause a power outage to the ports.
You might submit a ticket to PacketFlux if you need a 100% answer, they
usually respond right away to their tickets. Forest might chime in here on
the list.
-Sean
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:16 AM Eric Muehleisen wrote:
> Is a
There is also that we looked several times and decided there was
way too much red tape and string for us to bother with it.
On 1/29/20 1:38 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
We had an opportunity to bid on CAF via the New York State BPO in 2018.
Nobody involved like the strings attached. At this
Maybe it's because the low hanging fruit has been taken and the rest
doesn't work?
I just finished a proposal for fiber to the home for two rural
communities here in Pennsylvania.
I knew it would cost money and grants would be needed, but what I didn't
realize until after I finished the
Not what I read. The early sats (the ones other than the first
60) do not have the laser communications between them, but they do
have an RF link between them. They are functional.
bp
On 1/29/2020 7:56 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
The sats
Is a RackInjector firmware upgrade service affecting? Will it disrupt
service to the ports it's powering during the upgrade process?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
75 matches
Mail list logo
