Oh, ... nevermind...
-Original Message-
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:32 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5x troubleshooting
The AF5X is a connectorized version. The "peanut" design of other AFxx
designs is not applicable.
bp
<part1
The AF5X is a connectorized version. The "peanut" design of other AFxx
designs is not applicable.
bp
On 10/18/2016 8:17 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
AF has a non symmetry in the TX and RX antennas. If all the signal
was coming out of the same antenna I would say that
He is using AF5X
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Chuck McCown
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2016 17:18
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] AF5x troubleshooting
AF has a non symmetry in the TX and RX antennas. If all the signal was coming
out of the same antenna I
AF has a non symmetry in the TX and RX antennas. If all the signal was coming
out of the same antenna I would say that yes, it is hard to cause a non
symmetry.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5x troubleshooting
RF paths
I start
looking for zebras.
If you have a spare radio, I would swap out the radio at the xmt end of the bad
path.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:52 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5x troubleshooting
I
I would bet on the tank causing problems. You need to be 10-20 or more
wavelengths away from anything to get predictable results.
From: Craig House
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5x troubleshooting
It's always been pretty accurate in the past
If it were me I'd bring a change of hardware on the tx site (not from the
screenshot, the other one transmitting).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Craig House
wrote:
> Yes
Yes -64 before I changed dishes and turned up the power a bit. Link planner
showed -64 also. I'm getting it on all but one chain.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 18:46, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> Do you remember what ideal was supposed to be? Hopefully
Do you remember what ideal was supposed to be? Hopefully -64?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Craig House
wrote:
> The antennas were set to 23 DB antennas and I change
The antennas were set to 23 DB antennas and I change them up after I took this
picture to 30 DBI dishes that I'm using. It did change the ideal signal but it
didn't change the actual signal
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 18:41, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>
Do you have your power/antennas set right? Between those two points and
the set power levels you're supposed to see -53...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Craig House
It's always been pretty accurate in the past and I have a pretty wide-open view
I'm 85 feet up on the water tower that sits on a mountaintop on one end and I'm
200 feet up on the building roof top on the other end. The odd part is that I
am achieving that -65 signal on at least one of the
Doesn't include land cover I bet
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 17, 2016 7:25 PM, "Craig House" wrote:
> Wink planner shows that it supposed to be a -65 signal
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct
Plug into LinkPlanner
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 17, 2016 7:11 PM, "Craig House" wrote:
> Very close to the top of the water tower on the remote end. It bottom of
> the dish is resting on hr
Very close to the top of the water tower on the remote end. It bottom of the
dish is resting on hr tank because the mount wasn't stable enough with all the
wind here today 45mph. I'll raise it up and brace the mount tomorrow and see
what happens.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 17, 2016, at
Probably something in the path. If it was a jumper or dish it would be
both sides the same loss.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 17, 2016 7:03 PM, "David Kunat" wrote:
> There are only two polarities on
There are only two polarities on th af-x series.
The first two are the receive signals at the local device.
The second two (Rem chain0 and Rem chain 1) are the remote device receive
levels (at the far end of the link).
Is there something in the way? Are you shooting close to the ground or
So when you have one chain that shows almost 20 dbi weaker than the other 3 how
do you tell which end to troubleshoot? I have already tried to point both ends
better but they are 22 miles apart by air. 45 minutes by drive and I dont
want to just keep driving and climbing if someone can tell
18 matches
Mail list logo