Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Application Errors

Michael Jackson usually responded in a few hours for me. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Nate Burke wrote: > Just for anyone searching in the future, I finally got a response

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Application Errors

Just for anyone searching in the future, I finally got a response back to my ticket. According to the ticket response, the HTTPS Ooklaserver daemon test is only for private speedtest instances. Of course I'm still waiting to be relisted since I changed the fallback http test from .ASP to

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Application Errors

does nanog list have an ookla people eater lurking? On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Nate Burke wrote: > My speedtest.net testing box bit the dust, and I'm having trouble getting > it rebuilt. Everything is testing perfect on > http://www.ookla.com/hosttester.php except for

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Application Errors

You can get a free SSL cert. Why not get one and see if that fixes it? On Sat, Jan 6, 2018, 1:08 PM Nate Burke wrote: > My speedtest.net testing box bit the dust, and I'm having trouble > getting it rebuilt. Everything is testing perfect on >

[AFMUG] Speedtest.net Application Errors

My speedtest.net testing box bit the dust, and I'm having trouble getting it rebuilt. Everything is testing perfect on http://www.ookla.com/hosttester.php except for the Oolkaserver Daemon HTTPS test. It fails test #4 "Response: , Error: Unknown SSL protocol error in connection to

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

r of geo location companies. >> >> >> >> Adam >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2017 5:00 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Speedtest.net pr

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

t > coast and we discovered had to fix the ownership and location entries with > a number of geo location companies. > > > > Adam > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2017 5:00 AM > *To:* af

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

pril 25, 2017 5:00 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification > > > > I just brought a new block of IPv4 addresses online, but when I run a test > to speedtest.net, I show the incorrect company as the provider. Anyone > have a good contac

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification I just brought a new block of IPv4 addresses online, but when I run a test to speedtest.net <http://speedtest.net> , I show the incorrect company as the provider. Anyone have a good contact over there that I can

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

5-5912 <(979)%20985-5912> > > j...@brazoswifi.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:54 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification > > > &

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

Mobile IT Pro - Brazos WiFi > > 979-985-5912 <(979)%20985-5912> > > j...@brazoswifi.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:00 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Speedtest.net

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

ject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification That’s where I corrected mine. Jim Bouse Owner Mobile IT Pro - Brazos WiFi 979-985-5912 j...@brazoswifi.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:54 AM To: af@afmug.com Sub

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

That’s where I corrected mine. Jim Bouse Owner Mobile IT Pro - Brazos WiFi 979-985-5912 j...@brazoswifi.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:54 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:52:06 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification They pull from the MaxMind database. https://support.maxmind.com/geoip-data-correction-request/ Jim Bouse Owner Mobile IT Pro - Brazos WiFi 979-985-5912 j...@brazo

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

Subject: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification I just brought a new block of IPv4 addresses online, but when I run a test to speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net>, I show the incorrect company as the provider. Anyone have a good contact over there that I can notify? Or are they pullin

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 7:00:17 AM Subject: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification I just brought a new block of IPv4 addresses online, but when I run a test to speedtest.net , I show the incorrect company as the provider. Anyone have a good contact over there t

[AFMUG] Speedtest.net provider identification

I just brought a new block of IPv4 addresses online, but when I run a test to speedtest.net, I show the incorrect company as the provider. Anyone have a good contact over there that I can notify? Or are they pulling from another database that I should be looking into? Thanks. Jason

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Velociter Wireless 209-838-1221 x115 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 9:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net Company internal, resources aren't used by Joe Blow on the internet, but employees or subscribers can

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Company internal, resources aren't used by Joe Blow on the internet, but employees or subscribers can use it for testing. You also get a very detailed stats collection with it. On Jun 26, 2016 9:08 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > What's the point of a private server? >

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

6:47 PM Subject: [AFMUG] speedtest.net so we have a gig backbone connection - finally purchased a "semi recent" computer that should be able to handle a descent speedtest. fastest we've gotten is like 660 meg on the epb fiber optic in chattanooga. anyone know of a test on speedtest.n

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

What's the point of a private server? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 26, 2016 10:05 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: > Not if it's a public server. Private one, yes. > On Jun 26, 2016 8:37 PM, "Aaron

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Not if it's a public server. Private one, yes. On Jun 26, 2016 8:37 PM, "Aaron Fitzgerald" wrote: > I thought the software was a cost in the thousands to run? > On Jun 26, 2016 6:10 PM, "Josh Luthman" > wrote: > >> I don't think they have boxes.

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

If you're in an area they want another server you trade your hardware for the software. I know I get basic reporting. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 26, 2016 9:37 PM, "Aaron Fitzgerald" wrote: > I thought

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

I thought the software was a cost in the thousands to run? On Jun 26, 2016 6:10 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > I don't think they have boxes. They just give you the software and > register/monitor the daemon on your hardware. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 >

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

I don't think they have boxes. They just give you the software and register/monitor the daemon on your hardware. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Peer

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Peer with ookla at the nearest IX. Or offer to colo one of their 1U boxes for free. On Jun 24, 2016 2:36 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" wrote: > > > so we have a gig backbone connection - finally purchased a "semi recent" > computer that should be able to handle a descent

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Hi, We ran extensive tests with speedtest.net software and we noticed the following possible issues you might encounter when trying to get the full gig out of your connection: - CPU power is crucial. Check your CPU usage while running speedtest. The more CPU is used, the less probable is for

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

) >> >> - Original Message - >> *From:* Gerard Dupont III <ger...@shelbybb.com> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2016 4:56 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net >> >> Jay, Our routing is a bit messed up right now. We turn

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

gt; > I’ve never seen speedtest.net results above about 9800Mbps. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2016 4:32 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net > > > > I have to move so

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

: [AFMUG] speedtest.net I have to move some things around, but we should have a 3x10Gbps iperf3 / speedtest.net<http://speedtest.net> server up in the next couple of weeks. The speed test data will sit in RAM, and it's feeding a pair of Chelsio T520-SO-CR ASIC NICs. Anywho, it's located

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

rd Dupont III <ger...@shelbybb.com> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2016 4:56 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net > > Jay, Our routing is a bit messed up right now. We turned up 10g to Atlanta > through our Brocade yesterday but the speedtest subnet i

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

ybb.com> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2016 4:56 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net > > Jay, Our routing is a bit messed up right now. We turned up 10g to Atlanta > through our Brocade yesterday but the speedtest subnet isn't being routed > through &g

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

no problem... what is a brocade? :) - Original Message - From: Gerard Dupont III To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net Jay, Our routing is a bit messed up right now. We turned up 10g to Atlanta through our Brocade

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

wow, i'll have to play with that. thanks - Original Message - From: Sterling Jacobson To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 4:47 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net Getting the full Gigabit can be a bit tricky. We have providers near us, including

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Jay, Our routing is a bit messed up right now. We turned up 10g to Atlanta through our Brocade yesterday but the speedtest subnet isn't being routed through that system yet. Gerard On Friday, June 24, 2016, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote: > > > so we have a gig backbone

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

an upgraded browser. I've actually seen better results a lot of times on random computer from IE or Edge than Chrome. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 3:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] speedtest.net so we have a gig backbone

Re: [AFMUG] speedtest.net

Double check at beta.speedtest.net maybe? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:36 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote: > > > so we have a gig backbone connection - finally purchased a "semi

[AFMUG] speedtest.net

so we have a gig backbone connection - finally purchased a "semi recent" computer that should be able to handle a descent speedtest. fastest we've gotten is like 660 meg on the epb fiber optic in chattanooga. anyone know of a test on speedtest.net where we should be able to get nearly the

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 4:59 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server I've been meaning to spin some speedtest.net servers up, but they no longer let you limit who is allowed to use them. I wanted 10G or Nx10G going to one

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server Where is Direct? -Original Message- From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 1:00 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server It doesn't show much actually. I want more analytics, and I thought

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

WISP - Original Message - From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 6:10:31 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server Last I understood (1 yr ago?) You could still buy one and firewall it off, then inter

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > *From: *"Jon Auer" <j...@tapodi.net> > *To: *"Anima

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jon Auer" <j...@tapodi.net> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 5:41:59 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server Some local people have been data minin

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

minate average speed test on download, lol! > Upload is much worse for the competition. > > -Original Message- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Keefe John > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:06 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.n

[AFMUG] Speedtest.net Server

Is there any third party web sites or apps that can give visuals on the data my speedtest.net server is collecting? Anyone seen anything like that? Or is it a closed platform? Seems like it has some scripting to store the data my server is collecting, maybe locally. But I want to see which

[AFMUG] Speedtest.net and EPMP

I've had a chance to work a little more with Speedtest.net and EPMP. No matter what I do, I cannot get a speedtest above 20x5 over an EPMP link. I have an I3 server, setup with routing over EPMP (with Vlan) or Af5, OSPF Controlling the routing. They are terminating into the same router at

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net and EPMP

Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 4:50 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net and EPMP I've had a chance to work a little more with Speedtest.net and EPMP. No matter what I do, I cannot get a speedtest above 20x5 over an EPMP link. I have an I3 server, setup with routing over EPMP

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net and EPMP

Is this ptp or ptmp? Using eptp mode or tdd? Only station? I've got an eptp link up that does 60 by 95 meg every test. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 4, 2015 5:50 PM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote: I've had a chance

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net and EPMP

We had similar problem with one customer, Darren in our office ended up visiting customer and playing with different settings. What worked was, changing the MTU setting from auto to 1480. Tushar On Aug 4, 2015, at 4:50 PM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote: I've had a chance to work

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson via Af Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 10:43 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? So, did it ever get above 1000Mbps? I have a 10Gbps SFP+ adapter coming in for my computer to test 10Gig from

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

isn't allowing it to do the full Gbps. So for now use a Mac? Or use IE on windows if you have a Gigabit connection to test on speedtest.net -Original Message- From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 12:42 PM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: RE: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? Interesting. I talked to Ookla about Gigabit, and they sent me information and some links to their stuff. I can get about 5-600Mbps locally to my machine, but I’ve got some work to do before it shows 960Mbps it should be doing. From: Af

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? We have done some extensive testing with the ookla speedtest.net server software as we wanted to optimize our speedtest server to be able to support multi gig's /sec. What we have found that firefox/opera actually preformed the best. We also noted

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? AFMUG server must have stripped the jpgs, because they are attached in the send folder, but when I received my own message the jpgs were gone. Anywho, I am seeing several hundred megs difference between IE and Chrome on several machine to several

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

, 2014 9:58 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? Chrome plugins causing the drop, perhaps? Even naked Chrome runs pretty heavy on resources. Chris Wright Velociter Wireless -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

both ways with IE and about 6-700Mbps in Chrome. -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:41 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? no attachment... -- bp part {dash} 15

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince via Af Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:41 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE?? no attachment... -- bp part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com On 12/12/2014 10:20 AM

[AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

I'm not sure what is going on, but recently I've noticed Ookla has changed speedtest.net so it works a lot better with IE. And it USED to work just fine with Chrome, but they changed something in the past month. Anyone else seeing this? It's very apparent at Gigabit speeds, see attached.

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

no attachment... -- bp part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com On 12/12/2014 10:20 AM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote: I'm not sure what is going on, but recently I've noticed Ookla has changed speedtest.net so it works a lot better with IE. And it USED to work just fine with

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

I don't see the issue...here's my result in Chrome. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3980421483 Regards, Chuck On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Bill Prince via Af af@afmug.com wrote: no attachment... -- bp part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com On 12/12/2014 10:20 AM,

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

I ran some tests on IE and Chrome. They are within a couple percent of each other as far as I can see. -- bp part {dash} 15 {at} SkylineBroadbandService {dot} com On 12/12/2014 10:20 AM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote: I'm not sure what is going on, but recently I've noticed Ookla has changed

Re: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized for IE??

I ran tests in IE, Chrome and Firefox, all close ish.. How different were your results? -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson via Af Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 10:20 AM To: 'af@afmug.com' Subject: [AFMUG] Speedtest.net optomized