Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Yep From: Jeremy Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 8:14 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv I looked at reselling the different options that were available at WISPAPALOOZA. I don't understand how I am supposed to sell a service for $55 a month (that DOESN'T include ESPN3), when

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv Jay I know you didn’t make it to the show, but we announced an IPTV solution focused for WISP’s. No $20k+ headend to purchase. We are using Roku boxes for the client devices – we could roll our own but Roku is a great value and customers already have them. Your

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

t; <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------ > *From: *"Jeremy"

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 9:14:01 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv I looked at reselling the different options that were available at WISPAPALOOZA. I

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

t; - Original Message - > *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Sunday, October 23, 2016 8:07 AM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iptv > > Football* > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions &

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

hah - that too - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 8:07 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv Football* - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

gt; > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net > <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 8:06:15 AM > Sub

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Football* - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 8:06:15 AM Subject:

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

I am pretty sure in our market - we will not fly without some kind of tv package. - Original Message - From: Josh Reynolds To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2016 1:11 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv The service we rolled out was identical to any cable system

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org <mailto:p...@paulstewart.org>> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 6:13:18 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv > > That’s pretty small for cloud

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

width. There is little margin in it and it is losing its > ability to compete with OTT. Plus, if it has problems you get the black > eye. > > From: Josh Reynolds > Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 3:08 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv > > > You're not l

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

: [AFMUG] Iptv You're not likely to run a full IPTV stack as a wisp. There's not enough bandwidth. For a fiber co, its great. Chuck has/had a thing he was looking at that works like Netflix as far as how it streams that MIGHT work for SOME WISPs. On Oct 22, 2016 3:44 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller&

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

does anyone record the home shopping network? lol - Original Message - From: Ken Hohhof To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv And my wife records the rest. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

And my wife records the rest. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 9:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv Right, that's where I was going. There's only so much content that people record. - Mike Hammett <h

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 9:00:10 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv Most users are recording the same stuff as others. Yes, this one used dedupe. Single download is nice. On Oct 22, 2016 6:14 PM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Without dedupli

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

erswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ---------- > *From: *"Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Saturday, October 22, 2016 6:13:18 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ipt

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

here in the central office here or something? i >> guess? >> >> >> - Original Message - >> *From:* Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Sent:* Saturday, October 22, 2016 4:06 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iptv >>

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Without deduplication? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 6:13:18 PM Subject:

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

re or something? i guess? > > - Original Message - > From: Josh Reynolds <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 4:06 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv > > Multicast bulk channels, u

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

ginal Message - > *From:* Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Saturday, October 22, 2016 4:06 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iptv > > Multicast bulk channels, unicast for on-demand or cloud DVR. > > On Oct 22, 2016 3:44 PM, "CBB - Jay Ful

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

That looks identical to the AT UVerse remote. Their STB is Cisco. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 3:59 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

No sir. Auburn as well :) Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: "Bill Prince" To: Subject: [AFMUG] Iptv Date: Sat, Oct 22, 2016 4:25 PM Jay, is 'bama the only football you watch? bp On

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Jay, is 'bama the only football you watch? bp On 10/22/2016 1:58 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote: Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" To: "af@afmug.com" Subject:

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

have been thinking fiber - Original Message - From: Josh Reynolds To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv You're not likely to run a full IPTV stack as a wisp. There's not enough bandwidth. For a fiber co, its great

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

cloud dvr stored somewhere in the central office here or something? i guess? - Original Message - From: Josh Reynolds To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 4:06 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv Multicast bulk channels, unicast for on-demand or cloud DVR

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

You're not likely to run a full IPTV stack as a wisp. There's not enough bandwidth. For a fiber co, its great. Chuck has/had a thing he was looking at that works like Netflix as far as how it streams that MIGHT work for SOME WISPs. On Oct 22, 2016 3:44 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller"

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

Multicast bulk channels, unicast for on-demand or cloud DVR. On Oct 22, 2016 3:44 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" wrote: > > On a quick vacation to the beach.condo has centurylink prismwhich > I assume is pretty similar to att uversewhich is iptv all over again. >

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

it looks like wifi supports 2 gig or 5 gig - Original Message - From: That One Guy /sarcasm To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iptv worth looking at the gear theyre using if a multitenant location is delivering iptv via wifi

Re: [AFMUG] Iptv

worth looking at the gear theyre using if a multitenant location is delivering iptv via wifi in hd and its working well its a curiousity On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 3:44 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote: > > On a quick vacation to the beach.condo has centurylink

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

ertainly do some good stuff! > >> - Original Message - >> From: Paul Stewart <mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> >> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 7:36 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV >> >> Fair enough .. altho

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

The original La Femme Nikita (USA 1997-2001 or so) was canada Flashpoint was canada they certainly do some good stuff! - Original Message - From: Paul Stewart To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 7:36 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV Fair enough .. although movie

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Yes, RCTV. From: Paul Stewart Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 7:25 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV So when you suggest HLS and no middleware, you are outsourcing? If you want to have fun, HEVC+HLS is a great way to lose some hair ;) From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

So when you suggest HLS and no middleware, you are outsourcing? If you want to have fun, HEVC+HLS is a great way to lose some hair ;) From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: July 5, 2016 9:08 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV You have to groom

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

. The network is going to be used either way. From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 11:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV As someone deploying one right now, it is far more network efficient than stream/perViewer. On Jul 4, 2016 11:51 PM, "Aaron Fitzgerald

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

6 7:42 PM To: <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV There is going to have to be something new come to market. With the way things are moving, it's not worth investing in a full setup like most companies are using right now. The system Chuck is working on c

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

ul 4, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Amen, been there done that. Forget IGMP based systems too. >> >> *From:* Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> >> *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 7:42 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com &g

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

dband.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, July 03, 2016 7:42 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV > > There is going to have to be something new come to market. With the way > things are moving, it's not worth investing in a full setup like most > companies are using right

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

& Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 7:53:37 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

.. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: July 4, 2016 4:51 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV To be fair, Canada isn't exactly a driving decision maker of United States media content producers. On Jul 4, 2016 3:48 PM, "Paul Stewar

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Touche. On Jul 4, 2016 6:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > There is TV because TV was free. > > *From:* Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > *Sent:* Monday, July 04, 2016 5:51 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV &g

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

There is TV because TV was free. From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 5:51 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV If TV was free, there would be no TV. On Jul 4, 2016 6:50 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: I am one of those that believe

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

If TV was free, there would be no TV. On Jul 4, 2016 6:50 PM, "Bill Prince" wrote: > I am one of those that believes that TV should be free. That's why we get > ours OTA. > > > bp > > > > On 7/4/2016 4:03 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote: > > The thing

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

I am one of those that believes that TV should be free. That's why we get ours OTA. bp On 7/4/2016 4:03 PM, Bruce Robertson wrote: The thing is, even with all my add-ons (HBO, Showtime and no-commercial Hulu) I'm still paying /far/ less than I was for Dish or

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

of the other utilities to access ROWs. > > *From:* Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > *Sent:* Monday, July 04, 2016 4:18 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV > > > Something else to mention: being affiliated with one of the larger content >

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Shouldn’t be, not in the US. If you are a BIAS provider, you have all the rights of any of the other utilities to access ROWs. From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 4:18 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV Something else to mention: being affiliated with one

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

On 7/4/16 15:48, Chris Fabien wrote: So far it's the closest we have found to a product that is possible for a small provider like us. We are considering launching with it. But I still think it will be a stopgap measure to attract those customers who think they need a bundle. Maybe thats okay if

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

The thing is, even with all my add-ons (HBO, Showtime and no-commercial Hulu) I'm still paying /far/ less than I was for Dish or DirecTV. On 07/04/2016 03:25 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 7/4/16 15:04, Bill Prince wrote: You talking about HBO Go or HBO Now? Is that content worth $15/month?

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

I don't watch Silicon Valley (yet) but GoT is worth $15/mo. And you can always turn it off like now, when the season is over. On 07/04/2016 03:25 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 7/4/16 15:04, Bill Prince wrote: You talking about HBO Go or HBO Now? Is that content worth $15/month? HBO Go is

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

> to invest some money with the middleware provider for a license you can > create your own packages. > > *From:* Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > *Sent:* Monday, July 04, 2016 12:00 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV > > I'

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

But you'd have to pay me at least $30/month to force me to watch those ($15 each). They're probably not interested in that model ;-)... bp On 7/4/2016 3:25 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: HBO Now is worth it to me for Game of Thrones and Silicon Valley alone.

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

On 7/4/16 15:04, Bill Prince wrote: You talking about HBO Go or HBO Now? Is that content worth $15/month? HBO Go is the participating provider version i.e. cable provider. HBO Now is standalone stream subscription version. I use a Roku. HBO Now is worth it to me for Game of Thrones and

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://globalnews.ca/news/1892474/canada-to-require-a-la-carte-television-service-by-december-2016/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

gt;>> It’s been mandated now in Canada for a la carte by end of year >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://globalnews.ca/news/1892474/canada-to-require-a-la-carte-television-service-by-december-2016/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

s/1892474/canada-to-require-a-la-carte-television-service-by-december-2016/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds >>> *Sent:* July 4, 2016 4:26 PM >>&g

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

oun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds *Sent:* July 4, 2016 4:26 PM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV I'm of the same opinion, however we are still 5+ years away fro

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

lds *Sent:* July 4, 2016 4:26 PM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV I'm of the same opinion, however we are still 5+ years away from that, at a minimum. Ten if you want ala-carte ESPN. On Mon, Jul 4,

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

alnews.ca/news/1892474/canada-to-require-a-la-carte-television-service-by-december-2016/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds >> *Sent:* July 4, 2016 4:26 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

.ca/news/1892474/canada-to-require-a-la-carte-television-service-by-december-2016/ > > > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* July 4, 2016 4:26 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPTV >

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

: [AFMUG] IPTV I'm of the same opinion, however we are still 5+ years away from that, at a minimum. Ten if you want ala-carte ESPN. On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > wrote: I'm of

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

I'm of the same opinion, however we are still 5+ years away from that, at a minimum. Ten if you want ala-carte ESPN. On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > I'm of the opinion that unbundling is the future, so even if the solution > isn't

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Yes From: CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Monday, July 04, 2016 8:58 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV Same company? http://www.realchoice.tv/ another seemed to be on facebook but their website was dead and no posts since 2015 - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Same company? http://www.realchoice.tv/ another seemed to be on facebook but their website was dead and no posts since 2015 - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 10:55 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV I am still working

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

, 2016 12:00 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV I'm of the opinion that unbundling is the future, so even if the solution isn't perfect it should be a good stop gap that won't cost a ton of money to get started with. I just can't see investing in a full headend and associated

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Amen, been there done that. Forget IGMP based systems too. From: Jason McKemie Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 7:42 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV There is going to have to be something new come to market. With the way things are moving, it's not worth investing in a full setup

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

: Monday, July 4, 2016 1:00:07 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV I'm of the opinion that unbundling is the future, so even if the solution isn't perfect it should be a good stop gap that won't cost a ton of money to get started with. I just can't see investing in a full headend and associated

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

I'm of the opinion that unbundling is the future, so even if the solution isn't perfect it should be a good stop gap that won't cost a ton of money to get started with. I just can't see investing in a full headend and associated infrastructure at this point in the game. On Monday, July 4, 2016,

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

There are downsides to the solution he has as well. It all depends on how much control you need, and if X channel is important to your subscriber base or not. It also depends on the feature set you want to offer your customers (to truly compete with cable cos). On Jul 3, 2016 8:42 PM, "Jason

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

There is going to have to be something new come to market. With the way things are moving, it's not worth investing in a full setup like most companies are using right now. The system Chuck is working on could be worthwhile when available. On Sunday, July 3, 2016, Aaron Fitzgerald

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

That transport we talked about and I can arrange a cross connect to one. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Aaron Fitzgerald" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday,

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

Chuck can you send me their info offlist? Thanks! On Jul 3, 2016 10:55 AM, "Chuck McCown" wrote: > I am still working on it. Realchoice tv is up and working well provided > you have a VLAN to their headend signal. They are talking to a larger tier > 2 provider about

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV

I am still working on it. Realchoice tv is up and working well provided you have a VLAN to their headend signal. They are talking to a larger tier 2 provider about nationwide access for $300/month. From: Aaron Fitzgerald Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 9:52 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject:

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV Headend

Arrgh, that was supposed to be off list... CQ, Calling Craig Baird -Original Message- From: Chuck McCown Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 12:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] IPTV Headend Hi Craig, Do you have a TV headend in St. Geo or surrounding area? Chuck

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV growth

Here is a link to all IPTV stuff I have been reading http://www.globalvisionmag.com/?s=IPTVx=8y=14 Jaime Solorza On Jan 2, 2015 3:21 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: Do they consider OTT IPTV? *From:* Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com *Sent:* Friday, January 02, 2015 2:54

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV growth

Do they consider OTT IPTV? From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 2:54 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] IPTV growth According to article 50% in US this year Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV growth

- From: Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:21:35 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV growth Do they consider OTT IPTV? From: Jaime Solorza Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 2:54 PM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] IPTV growth According to article 50

Re: [AFMUG] IPTV growth

They'd have to for those numbers. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:21:35 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPTV growth Do they consider OTT IPTV