I don't think it should apply to MAY, only CAN or SHALL. MAY should
imply permissibility without possibility. CAN makes sense in general
and SHALL makes sense because obligations should be possible.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I submit this Proposal, AI-3, "C
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I like this. Slight spelling fix, though: in the paragraph after the list of
> protected actions, "ILLEGAL" is wrongly spelled "ILEGAL"
Done.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 1:18 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> " An asset or class of assets is private, rather than public, if it's
> backing document is a contract."
>
> There should be no apostrophe in "it's". Sorry for spamming six
> messages in a row, I should have put these all in one message.
Probab
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 00:29 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
> A lot of feedback here. Much of it is typo corrections, but not all of
> it.
>
>> Destroy each contract. [Just in case.]
> "Contract" is not current
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I'd be happy to review the latest version, but I don't want to use the last
> version because I won't know what has changed. Could you share your current
> copy?
Sure.
-Aris
---
Title: Contracts v4
Adoption index: 3.0
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal:
>
> Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3)
> {{{
> Text in square brackets is not a substantive part of this proposal and is
> ignored when it takes effect.
>
> Amend Rule 105, bullet 2 to read "When a ru
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:50 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Title: A Reward for Obedience
> Author: ATMunn
> Co-Author(s):
> AI: 1
>
> Create a new power-1 rule titled "Badges of Honor"
> {
> Badges of Honor are an indestructible, player-owned asset. The Referee
> is the recordkeepor for Badges of Hono
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>> Amend Rule 1023 by appending "The same applies, mutatis mutandis, to for
>> determining whether two points in time are within N months of each other,
>> for N greater than or equal to 2." as a new paragraph in the fourth
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 03:30 Aris Merchant
> wrote
>>
>> # 1 Cleanup & Miscellaneous
>> # 1.1 Gamestate Cleanup
>>
>> Destroy each organization.
>
>
> We used to have a rule that made t
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Decided to put my money where my mouth is.
>
> Proposal: Deregulation (AI=3)
> {{{
> Repeal Rule 2493 (Regulations).
> Repeal Rule 2494 (The Regkeepor).
> Amend Rule 2464 (Tournaments) to read as follows:
> A Tournament is a sub-game of A
> CoE: my proposal "Clarity Act" is not listed as being in the Proposal
>> Pool, which it is because you did not distribute it.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017, 23:50 Aris Merchant, <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I hereby di
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:23 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I claim the reward of 1 shiny for this report. I pledge to transfer
> all shinies I receive before my next deregistration to the first
> non-Alexis person who pledges that they will use 90% of the shinies I
> transfer em in accordance with the ins
A new contracts version is affixed.
-Aris
---
Title: Contracts v5
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada,
Trigon, Alexis, P.S.S.
Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brackets ("[]")
have no effect on the behavior of
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 at 21:17 Aris Merchant
> wrote
>>
>> No, there definitely is a problem with giving rule permission for
>> people to define arbitrary things that could be paradoxical. Both
>> organiza
Darn, typo. I retract Safety Regulations. I submit the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Safety Regulations v2
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-author(s): Alexis
Amend Rule 2493, "Regulations", by
* Replacing every instance of the word "instrument" with the words "textual
entity"; a
Or you could just ratify the resolution of the election. That's even simpler.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Actually, maybe the easiest thing is to wait 4 hours for the original
> voting period to end (unofficially), tally the votes, and then ratify
> the ADoP r
t week, thereby failing to distribute all pending
> proposals.
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:38 Aris Merchant,
> wrote:
>>
>> This following is a revision to the proposal pool from my last report.
>>
>> The proposal pool contains the following propo
r was reminded and had the
> opportunity to avoid the violation by distributing the proposal at the time
> of the report.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 17:59 Aris Merchant,
> wrote:
>>
>> Very true. I plead guilty and request the mercy of the Referee for
>>
a green card or a yellow card would seem
reasonable under the circumstances.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> If by "the report" you mean the one I just I did, I avoided that
> because I'm preparing the next report and its easier for people to
&
e than the inconvenience of having to reply
> to two voting messages to vote.
>
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> If by "the report" you mean the one I just I did, I avoided that
>> because I'm preparing the next report and its easier for people to
&g
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> There are many places where Agora essentially calls eval(T), where T is some
> text from a player. This includes:
>
> The rules, of course
> Proposals
> Regulations
> Other powered instruments (do we have any of those lying around?)
> Public
As a general rule, if you aren't sure that something is read it should
be a proto, not a proposal.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I withdraw it; I had some revisions to do and it isn't ready.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 18:27 Aris Merchant,
x27;s why, IMHO, it's a better idea to proto it if you're not
sure about it.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> If you aren't sure it's ready, you shouldn't pend it!
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017, 19:08 Aris Merchant,
> wrote:
>&g
purported Promotor's report? There is no information in the
>> report which isn't in the document, and this is clearly published by the
>> Promotor with the intent to convey all of the report's information. The
>> subject further implies it was a report.
>>
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>> 7922* Alexis 3.0 Clarity Act Alexis 1 AP
>>
>
> H. Assessor, H. Promotor:
>
> Proposal 7922 tinkers with the defini
I recommend a green card. Given the preceding a-d discussion, this was
clearly an accidental omission and not an attempt at fraud.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:02 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I point a finger at myself for not stating that the document was wrong.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:06 PM,
Does this look right to everyone?
-Aris
---
Revised proposal pool (effective at the time of my last report):
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
pp1 o 2.0 Faster Auctions
pp2* G.1.7 Appeals improv
I vote as follows:
> ID Author(s) AI TitlePender Pend fee
> ---
> 7922* Alexis 3.0 Clarity Act Alexis 1 AP
FOR
> 7923* Gaelan 1.0 Another Econom
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
> I'm posting this now partially for feedback, and partially so I can
> easily establish it if/when contracts pass:
>
> Title: Nichdel's Premium Stamp Market
>
> Any player may become, or cease to be, a party of this contract by
> announcement.
Yo
The generally accepted interpretation is that the action entirely
fails. Welcome back!
-Aris
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Madeline wrote:
> Alright, so what... does happen? It specifies you can't destroy a stamp if
> Agora can't pay the balance, but nothing else has a similar clause which
Our economic troubles have gone on long enough. Printing money has
been rejected, despite it being what we had intended to use if we ever
run out. If we don't want to print money, we _need_ taxes. I intend to
write a tax proposal, but first we need to decide on the tax rates.
Income taxes won't re
o times the playercount as the minimum should work?)
>
>
>
> On 2017-10-21 09:53, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
>> Our economic troubles have gone on long enough. Printing money has
>> been rejected, despite it being what we had intended to use if we ever
>> run out. If we don&
I've requested that the judge consider what would happen in that rule's
absence.
-Aris
On Oct 20, 2017 6:59 PM, "Alexis Hunt" wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 21:53 Aris Merchant gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, given that this makes things more int
at 12:59 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 21:53 Aris Merchant
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Actually, given that this makes things more interesting... I SH-CFJ (or
> >> AP-CFJ if the action would otherwise fail due to lack of
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> Three reasons that would be a bad judgment, which I would likely moot:
>>
>> 1. I'm paying for the CFJ, which means the judge will get paid for it.
>&g
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:10 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've been
> a player. I think Gaelan took them out.
Indeed, e did. I and others have volunteered to help annotate CFJs,
including working on the backlog, but it never happened. The last F
Arguments: I disagree with the claim that the standard of clarity is
"heightened" from a normal by announcement action. The rule says that
it has to be clear that the notice is a notice of honor, but it
doesn't say that that clarity can't come from the title. Here it's
very clear from content, cont
n wondering for a while about this.
>
> What's the intent for this?
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>>
>> The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations)
>>
>>
&g
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:22 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I'm just going to make sure my vote actually changes.
>
> If, despite the aforementioned October 19 post, my vote on proposals
> 7922-7929 has not changed, I vote as follows:
...
> 7925: FOR
Again, voting for both this and contracts is a rather b
True, I suppose. I have a feeling "can by regulation" would probably
allow regulations either by announcement or with notice, but that's
not the end of the world.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 00:16 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote
I think you mean pend, not spend.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 2:52 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I create and spend a shiny to spend the following
> Name: Repeal the Reportor
> AI: 1
> Author: me
> Text: Repeal rule 2446 "The Agoran Newspaper"
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
I concur. We finally have an active reportor, now is not the time to
repeal the newspaper.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Why though? Even if it isn't an entirely useful of the game, I still enjoy
> reading the newspaper every week.
>
> On 10/22/2017 3:52 PM, VJ Ra
tial possible. While all the
> other offices have a report containing information, this office is
> just "make a report!" "with what?" "words!".
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> I concur. We finally have an active rep
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> The regkeepor should be monthly not weekly - if you want a sinecure
> it's that - a completely empty weekly report for the last two months.
The Regkeepor has been diligently doing eir work unpaid, except for
those weeks in which e forgets
Not apart from deregistration and administrative fees, neither of
which would normally be considered taxes.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> We already have taxes.
>
>
> On 10/22/2017 07:39 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I su
Pardon me if I'm missing something, but this doesn't seem to be pended.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I submit the following Proposal, AI-3, "Registration fix finally":
>
> --
> [It looks like
Just a draft to make sure I haven't messed something up again.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 8.0 and the valid
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Josh T wrote:
> Assuming that Contracts are now a thing, I am going to reinstate the fox's
> vote shoppe.
>
> If Contracts exist, I create the following contract, titled "狐票店", by paying
> Agora 1 Shiny:
> {{{
> The player 天火狐 is the proprietor of 狐票店 (intended pr
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Josh T wrote:
> Assuming that Contracts are now a thing, I am going to reinstate the fox's
> vote shoppe.
>
> If Contracts exist, I create the following contract, titled "狐票店", by paying
> Agora 1 Shiny:
> {{{
> The player 天火狐 is the proprietor of 狐票店 (intended pr
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 09:33 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
>> When is it better to use MAY as opposed to CAN?
> MAY is used in a situation where something would normally be possible
> but illegal, and it makes it possible but legal. For example, we used
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> Actually, given that this makes things more interesting... I SH-CFJ (or
>> AP-CFJ
>> if the action would otherwise fail due to lack of shinies) "If there
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Consequently, I'm considering dropping out of the race in favour of Trigon,
> but I have a few questions for em:
>
> 1. What method do you plan to use to keep the ruleset up to date?
> 2. A past practice of Rulekeepors has been to, upon changes
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Revised based on feedback.
>
> Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3, coauthors=G, PSS)
> {{{
> Text in square brackets is not a substantive part of this proposal and is
> ignored when it takes effect.
>
> Amend Rule 105, bullet 2 to read "When a
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I plan to run for the office of Surveyor with a proposed set of land
> reforms. The incumbant's tenure has been marked with a low, supply-
> side policy that has marginalized land and made it a part of the
> ongoing economic malaise - e
If people could try to keep proposal activity to a minimum for about
24 hours so I could get this out, it would be nice.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote c
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:07 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 at 22:01 Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If people could try to keep proposal activity to a minimum for about
>> 24 hours so I could get this out, it
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:08 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 at 22:01 Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 7940* Alexis, [3]3.0 High Power Cleanup Alexis 1 AP
>>
>
> I withdraw this proposal,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:47 PM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 02:40 +, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > Campaign Proposals are Official Proposals, so they don't need manual
> > pending.
>
> If you decide to pay the shinies to pend one even though it's already
> pending, does it then pay out
ts. My Github Username is CodeTriangle.
> A2. If anyone wants to do volunteer work, I will gladly accept it.
>
> If anyone else has questions, or if I did not give adequate responses, I
> would be happy to address them.
>
>
> On 10/24/2017 7:14 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>
&g
And this is why o held 5 offices, and why its still a good idea to
keep em in several of them. Not only did e personally write a good
portion of the economy, but you will note that e displays clear
symptoms of civic-mindedness.
-Airs
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On
NttPF.
-Aris
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:53 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> Ah. I retract the below proposal. I didn't pend it anyway, and obviously
> nobody will vote for it.
>
>
> On 10/25/2017 9:51 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Needs to be AI-3 to work.
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, ATMunn wrote:
>>>
>>
s Scholasticus
> wrote:
>> But retraction is itself informal.
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2017 08:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>>> NttPF.
>>>
>>> -Aris
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:53 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>>
You are warned that this contains links, which will appear in the distribution.
-Aris
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I create the following Proposal and pend it with 1 AP:
>
> Title: Spoopy Agorans
> Content:
>
> * Amend "Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registr
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>=
> THE SCROLL OF AGORA
> ===
> Herald's Monthly Report
> Octo
Oh. That makes sense. It's still probably going to be a bigger problem
for o than me though.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:37 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I'm not Notary, just Promotor and Regkeepor. I think you m
r Aris in that capacity.
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:37 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> > I'm not Notary, just Promotor and Regkeepor. I think you mean o. I
>> > pay o 5 shinies to thank em fo
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Josh T wrote:
> I create the following contract, titled "Order of the Occult Hand", by
> paying Agora 1 Shiny:
> {{{
> The player 天火狐 is the proprietor of the Order of the Occult Hand. The
> proprietor CAN make amendments to this contract by announcing eir intent t
about giving some of the Pot to the Promotor? If so,
> what is a reasonable amount?
>
> 天火狐
>
>
> On 28 October 2017 at 19:02, Alex Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 15:44 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> > I didn't consider that. They do have to b
I missed this. I'll distribute it with my proposal pool, which may be
a little late (please don't point a finger at me anyone), but should
be coming out in the next ~24 hours.
-Aris
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, and spend 2 sh. to pend
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:01 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> The draft of my long-awaited (not really) auctions proposal is finally
> finished.
> Here it is in all its glory (not really):
You're doing a thing where each sentence is on its own line. They
should preferably be in paragraphs.
> Title: Auctions
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
> Hot-take proto: Make contract membership cards an asset that can only be
> voluntarily received.
The beautiful thing about contracts is that they can do this
themselves if they want to. Oh, they can't say that if you have a card
you're a member,
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>> Hot-take proto: Make contract membership cards an asset that can only be
>> voluntarily received.
>
> The beautiful thing about contracts is that they can do this
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 2:03 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I also call a much more straightforward CFJ with shinies donated to
> charity on the following statement: "Judicial Activism: the Contract
> has 'fulfilled its purpose, does not specify any gamestate affecting
> statements, or otherwise seems unlik
Also, ATMunn, those IDs have been used (well, apparently not actually, but
I attempted to use them and changing it now would be confusing). Only the
Promotor can identify a proposal anyway, I think.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:59 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> It appears that recent Agoran decisio
Yes, as it happens. There is a decision on the matter in the first
paragraph of CFJ 3523 [1]. It is in agreement with your proposed
ruling.
[1] https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3523
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Madeline wrote:
> My first instinct here is to judge thi
How? Keeping money isn't really a profit, is it?
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Madeline wrote:
> I'd suggest a blue card, actually, since you profited from the rules breach.
>
>
>
> On 2017-10-30 13:40, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>> The worst that can come out of this CFJ is that I am found to
Here's a draft. This should work properly, right?
-Aris
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR a
; On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> Here's a draft. This should work properly, right?
>>
>> -Aris
>>
>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:13 PM Telnaior wrote:
> I vote:
>
> FOR 7931
> FOR 7932 (this is way cooler than a victory election)
> FOR 7933
> AGAINST 7934 (why are we turning into a literature club I'm awful at poems)
> FOR 7935 (but you might want to make the revision limit switch secured)
> FOR 7
OFFICIAL PARTY PROCLAMATION
The Party has benevolently governed Agora for a long time, protecting the
interests of the players and the game. Recently, it has come to the attention
of Party leadership that some persons may be attempting to seditiously defy
party authority. This cannot be tolerated,
play warewolf?
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > OFFICIAL PARTY PROCLAMATION
> >
> > The Party has benevolently governed Agora for a long time, protecting the
> > interests of the players and the game. Recently, it has come to the
> at
ssians?
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> >
> > It's actually inspired by something G. said about a past mini game. I was
> > thinking maybe there wouldn't even be actual traitors, just accusations
> of
> > trea
I don't think e ever resolved the intent.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:29 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Didn't o promulgate a regulation setting the weekly contract limit at 3?
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> The ACORN (Ago
t; it's rather clear who would win a strict popularity contest.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> I don't mind but I feel like we already have Karma for a popularity mechanic
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Aris Merchant
>> wrote
, VJ Rada wrote:
> >> I support.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Aris Merchant
> >> wrote:
> >>> I intend to destroy JA:tC with 2 Agora Consent, on the basis that it
> has
> >>> been judged INEFFECTIVE.
> &
I disagree. We need to increase rates and institute a wealth tax. The
problem is those who aren't working but have money built up that they
aren't using, not the working class Agorans who toil away preforming useful
functions. The fact certain past Reportors have slacked off is no reason to
decreas
7;t
scale quite enough, but I'm not sure it's the right paradigm anyway.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:32 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> The wealthy people are wealthy _because_ of exorbitant report rates
> and welcome packages.
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Aris Merchant
The once per payment thing is good by the way, because it stops Agora from
piling up debt forever.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:00 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Oct 30, 2017, at 11:23 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >
> > If I pay agora all o' my shinies, will the actual payments go through?
>
> No
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:11 PM Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> >> Well, I'll agree about welcome packages. However, the report rates are
There is a significant possibility that implementing that system would
cause infinite exponential inflation. If we could control that, it sounds
workable.
-Aris
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:43 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> Why do we not just have Agora just be infinitely rich and tie floating
> values on h
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
>Below is an exhaustive list of Reward Conditions and eir rewards:
Please change this to their. This bugs me an insane amount.
-Aris
And I can't distribute them. And I can't remove them, because they're
pending. I knew this was a bad idea.
-Aris
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:34 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> Sorry Munn, neither the initiation of the election nor the
> distribution of the proposal worked. Rules say the following "the ADoP
>
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 5:18 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> Thanks for this, Aris. Comments on your comments below.
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, and thank you for looking at
my comments.
>>> If the contract that made one of its parties an Auctioneer of an
>>> auction does not permit t
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> In my work on the rules history, I discovered that around 1999, it was
> possible to adopt proposals outside the normal distribution process, and
> this led to two proposals being adopted without classic ID numbers: one with
> ID number "01-00
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:11 PM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 10:39 +1100, VJ Rada wrote:
> > It's already ILLEGAL to not pay it, and it certainly shouldn't be
> > made IMPOSSIBLE to bid more than you have, because you could gain
> > money later.
>
> In my opinion, bidding on an auctio
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:52 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:11 PM Alex Smith
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 10:39 +1100, VJ Rada wrote:
>> > It's already ILLEGAL to not pay it, and it certainly shoul
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:52 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Finally an excuse to suggest accounts (they're on the Massive Reform
I'm getting tired of waiting for others to release judicial reform
proposals, and am considering writing my own. As a loyal member (am I
the head?) of the "make Agora 2010 again" party, I suggest reenacting
the judicial system here [1] . I'd probably simplify it somewhat, in
particular removing som
ificantly better in those respects for the
current system. Also, the paradigm change sounds fun to me.
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:27 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I'd like to know what we're currently doing wrong that 2010-Agora was doing
> right?
>
> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 3:2
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: A Most Ingenious Paradox (AI=1.7)
Do you want to pend this?
-Aris
1 - 100 of 2209 matches
Mail list logo
