I might be interested, as well as interested in hopping back on the Agora boat, just got to read up on the rules, and the proposals, and well everything.On 8/18/06,
Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone interested in starting an Agoran region of nation-states?http://nationstates.net/
: REVERSE
The original CFJ statement was Quazie is inactive which GreyKnight
closed by saying
Then, by this ruling, Quazie will be inactive (so CFJ 1589 is
FALSE). It is pretty clear that
by stating that Quazie will be inactive, the CFJ becomes TRUE.
It is my understanding that Judge GreyKnight made
On 12/19/06, Jonathan Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm already hosting the wiki for the excellent Dwarf Fortress game
so I could create one in a few mouse clicks if needed. Is it really
needed at the moment though? I could see the use if we still had
card games, Arcadia or any complex
On 1/4/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/4/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. Being mutually exclusive offices is either a qualifier
on offices or a whole (nonseparable) term in and of itself, and does
not create an implicit definition Speaker ~ Offices.
That's
On 1/11/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grey Knight wrote:
The coat of arms of Agora is defined by the following blazon:
Nice. I was just thinking about proposing a rule specifying symbols of
the game. I noticed that the rule specifying that the name of the game is
Agora has gone, and I
On 1/11/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H. Clerk of the Courts, I hereby Call for Judgement on the statement:
Rule 955 should be interpreted such a voting index of Unanimity cannot
meet or exceed any numerical adoption index.
Unanimity is no
On 1/11/07, Zefram wrote:
(Imagine if it were possibleto cast a half vote.)
I've always thought this was a good idea... now if only i can come up with a
plausible way to implement it.
On 1/24/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I file a motion for the judge of CFJ 1605 (Goethe was deregistered in a
Writ of FAGE in December 2006 to consider the following argument:
Murphy claims that certain judgements were retroactively invalidated
by Proposal 4882. I strongly
So once the appeal goes through i was inactive as of CFJ 1589 BUT did i
become active again simply because GreyKnight stated that I would become
active?
Furthermore, if I am inactive, does that have any implications as far as the
game goes?
.
Caller: Goethe
Barred: Murphy, Sherlock
Judge: Quazie
Judgement:
History:
Called by Goethe
On 1/31/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The intent was to jump
ahead and make more Turns-for-All assignments
to the greatest extent possible. As things currently stand, and even
under your suggested middle ground, the CotC could have done this:
CFJ 1607 is assigned to Quazie
On 2/1/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I call for judgement on the following statement:
Zefram is a pineapple.
I wonder if it could, or should be possible to request to be a CFJ judge...
as i would enjoy this one.
On 2/1/07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Zefram is a pineapple.
Some thoughts:
As a matter of my R101 privilege to do as I wilt, it should be TRUE.
As a matter not pertinent to the rules, it should be DISMISSED.
(CFJs 1500-1504)
As an unregulated property of a
On 2/2/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quazie wrote:
without any photo
evidence that e doesn't wear pineapple suits at all time,
http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/personal/pics/
I ment while playing Agora, and none of those pictures inform
On 2/7/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thief!
On 2/7/07, Grey Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I deem myself to be deregistered.
I believe that the deeming done by Grey Knight, and the deeming that you
wished to do would have vastly different implications, one being from a
player and
Is anyone else defiantly inactive?
On 2/22/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: Initialize Activity
Upon the adoption of this proposal, all players become active.
--
Brandon Kwaselow (Quazie)
University of Michigan LSA, Residential College
Computer Science
as active, because it does not affect these CFJs.
For CFJ 1618, Quazie's level of activity is to be judged at the time the
CFJ was called (R217). At that instant Quazie was calling for judgement,
which is definitely game-relevant activity. E was therefore definitely
active in the context
On 3/8/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Levi Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I register.
Welcome to Agora!
Indeed. Welcome and enjoy yourself.
Quazie's VLOP by 1.
I spend one VC to increase Levi's VLOP by 1.
I spend one VC to increase Levi's VLOP by 1.
--
Brandon Kwaselow (Quazie)
University of Michigan LSA, Residential College
Computer Science
archive and an automated system. Now
that AI is a real number, I don't see why an automated system that e-mails
information to the forum would be undesirable. The only problem would be
removing a proposal from the proposal pool, but that could all be worked
out.
--
Brandon Kwaselow (Quazie
Ed Murphy wrote:
Zefram wrote:
On the whole, I'm not convinced that the extra complexity here (over
VCs)
is worthwhile. I'd like to play under the VC system for a while longer.
The combining-beads idea dates back to Steve's Separation of Money era,
at which time there were more units of
4930 | Simple VC win | Goethe| 1* | 02Apr07 | D
FOR
4931 | Herald to advertise | Zefram| 1 | 04Apr07 | O
FOR
4932 | Clarifying Excess CFJs | Levi | 1 | 05Apr07 | O
AGAINST
4933 | constrained refusal of e... | Zefram| 1 | 05Apr07 | O
FOR
Zefram wrote:
Here's a possible temporary patch on the proposal system, pending
upmutation of the right bits of the proposal system:
{{{
Enact a rule with Power=2, title Public Policy, and text:
The Speaker is obliged to veto any Ordinary Proposal whose effect
if adopted would in
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Quazie wrote:
I'm not sure if the rules allow me to do this or not. I request to not
judge the above linked CFJs.
I'm happy to turn you again w/o 2 objections so you don't have to judge
this round, and keep turning you until you say you'd like
Kerim Aydin wrote:
I assign the following linked CFJs to Goethe.
CFJ 1638:
where a proposal contains the form of words Amend rule by XXX.
Amend rule by YYY., this constitutes two separate attempts at
rule changes, even though both attempt to amend the same rule
CFJ 1639:
1 5 5 1
Murphy 1 9 * 9 7
OscarMeyr 111 11 1
Peter 111 11 0
Pineapple Partnership, c/o Zefram and Goethe
1 8 8 0
Quazie 110 10 0
Sherlock 1 1 1 2
Zefram wrote:
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I think that the past week's activity has been the most truly Agoran
activity I've seen in a couple of years, even more fun than the card-
based rebellion I instigated in late 2005. There should be enough
material in all of this for
quazie wrote:
I curse Goethe and Zefram.
I contemplate how curses can be incorporated into agora.
Proto-Proposal I curse thee!
*I want some interesting play mechanics, but i don't think that VC will
allow the idea i have. As chromodynamics failed we have no real
currency. I will gladly
Taral wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Proposal: No free votes
Adoption Index: 3
Change rule 1950 (Voting Limits) to read:
The voting limit of an eligible voter on a democratic proposal
is one and cannot be changed except by this rule.
The voting limit of an eligible
Ed Murphy wrote:
We really should re-enact Switches.
I support this
Michael Slone wrote:--
C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
(Why do I think I just got another entry in Maud's rotating quotes file?)
-- OscarMeyr, in agora-discussion
I love Maud's rotating quotes, they give me something extra to look
forward each day
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 1:47 AM, Taral wrote:
On 5/8/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Each trinket has a switch for owner, with states nobody and
all
entities. The
owner switch of a trinket cannot be flipped
except by
Michael Slone wrote:
On 5/13/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Human Point Two and I have made a R1742 binding agreement, the text of
which is:
1. Did Quazie agree to let Human Point Two let Human Point Three make
an agreement with you?
2. And people said we didn't need Senators
Michael Slone wrote:
On 5/13/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Human Point Two and I have made a R1742 binding agreement, the text of
which is:
1. Did Quazie agree to let Human Point Two let Human Point Three make
an agreement with you?
2. And people said we didn't need Senators
Zefram wrote:
I hereby submit the following proposal, titled transparent partnerships:
{{{
Enact a rule with title Transparent Personhood and text:
When a non-natural person becomes a player, e is obliged to as
soon as possible announce the legal theory by which e is a person.
Proto-Proposal - Partnerships with all the fixin's
If the following text exists within the ruleset, delete it
(f) The term person shall mean natural person or
partnership of natural persons
if a rule with the following text does not exist, create a rule entitled
Limited
Ed Murphy wrote:
4970 FOR
4971 FOR
4972 FOR
4973 PRESENT
4974 PRESENT
4975 FOR
I vote in the following manner:
If Murphy has voted on a proposal as of 5/16/07 @ 9:50pm (PST), I vote
in the same manner as e has.
{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 4972 (Democratic, AI=3) by Goddess Eris
No free votes II
Change rule 1950 (Voting Limits) to read:
The voting limit of an eligible voter on a democratic proposal
is one and cannot be changed except by this rule.
Michael Slone wrote:
On 5/17/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no attempt to achieve Agoran Consent for changing the holder
of a particular office is announced in a given quarter, then the
IADoP shall make at least one such attempt to change the
officeholder
Zefram wrote:
comex wrote:
How so?
We have in fact had several CFJs assigned to them.
-zefram
They can be removed from being judges on them can't they??
Ian Kelly wrote:
On 5/31/07, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard Annabel mentioned several times. Is there someplace I
could find
a synopsis of this crisis?
I don't think that anybody has ever written up a thesis on the
subject, so your best bet is probably just to go digging
Ed Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Mother, May I?
(AI = 3, please)
Create a rule titled Mother, May I? with Power 3 and this text:
The following terms are defined. These definitions MUST be used
when a rule includes a term in all caps, and SHOULD be used when
a rule includes
Taral wrote:
On 6/6/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby change myself from lying down to sitting.
I hereby change myself from lying down to dancing.
I hereby join the Goddess Eris in Dance.
Ed Murphy wrote:
quazie wrote:
Zefram wrote:
proto-proposal: CFJ by announcement
AI: 2
{{{
Amend rule 991 by replacing by submitting a Call for Judgement (CFJ)
to the Clerk of the Courts with by publishing a Call for Judgement
(CFJ).
Amend rule 897 by deleting the paragraph that begins
Ed Murphy wrote:
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Mature herbs may be sold by announcement, upon which the seller
receives the listed selling price.
Boring. Everyone will buy Ginger and nothing else, growing capital at
0.37 Np / week. Not only is it the highest yield over the long
Ed Murphy wrote:
http://www.ggl.com/news.php?NewsId=3086
If e is Leroy Jenkins then agora is even more eclectic than I even imagined.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quazie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NUM FL AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5546 D0 2ais523 Monstrous
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You couldn't talk about it, in public or private (that's the
unenforcable part), and all votes must be sent privately by email to ?
(I think the notary).
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Ben Caplan wrote:
Now, to discourage private collaboration (I'll vote FOR, you vote
AGAINST.)
Instead of discouraging, how about setting up a game where it's beneficial
to lie and backstab during
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/13 Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's the same sentiment, isn't it?
-root
Yes. And?
(I know Schrodinger's Cat from an IRC channel, so this isn't newbie
bashing: I'm interested)
ehird
If you aren't sure,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I support this Bah, as it reflects my thoughts exactly.
I also support this Bah
but not in mine?
To apvx Quazie:
I've been away for the weekend with limited internet. Trying to play
catch-up. I'll get theresorry for the wait.
BobTHJ
No problem, just checking on what was up.
Keep up the good Asseting.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/16 Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is your first post, right?
I can't see anything else by you in the logs.
If so, do you know what Agora
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Award Elder Lurker to both Michawl Norrish and David Nichol
At least you managed to misspell
When R2199 states
If this rule mentions at least six different specific colors for
Ribbons, then a player CAN destroy one Ribbon of each such color
in eir possession to satisfy the Winning Condition of
Renaissance.
does it mean that a player must have all types of ribbons to win OR
that e must
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anybody support changing black ribbons to be awarded for judging
a question on culpability rather than sentencing? It seems a bit
arbitrary that you can only get a black ribbon in cases where the
defendant happens to be
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2008 2:22:56 Quazie wrote:
I submit the following proposal entitled A win of monstrous
proportions with the following text:
---
Upon
If the Bank of Agora doesn't currently have an exchange rate for a
type of currency how does an exchange rate get initiated?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the Bank of Agora doesn't currently have an exchange rate for a
type of currency how does an exchange rate get initiated?
The list of exchange rates is part
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:01 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I ask the kind Bankers of the BOA to consider an exchange rate for
Points.
Points are a fixed currency, so they can't be transferred (and that
includes
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To resolve CFJs
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am posting an announcement of my intent to register as a player under the
name cdm014
Welcome to Agora! Any relation to ais523?
-root
New
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Alexander Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, all the players here could have an innocent reason
or a guilty reason for what they did, although comex jumping in and
closing off
the following associated contract, that I intend to eventually
make a contest.
{
1. This is a public contract. The name of this contract is Hurcules.
2. The contestmaster of this contract is called Zeus. Initially, the
position of Zeus shall be filled by Quazie.
3. Parties to this contract are known
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Chester Mealer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nomic Wiki after finding out about nomic and tried one game in person.
--
Chester Mealer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What game did you play in person? I was introduced to the concept of
Nomic in a similar way, through playing a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:27 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I make the following contract with the AFO: {{
1. This public contract (which becomes a public contract when it
forms) is called Mr. Monopoly 1. Parties
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quazie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BobTHJ wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I rename land #75 to Union Train Depot
Fails. A land
is called Zeus. Initially, the
position of Zeus shall be filled by Quazie.
The contestmaster is the person the rules say it is, not the person
the contract says it is.
I thought other contests did something similar, I'll fix this too.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 9:27:14 comex wrote:
scam
I initiate a criminal CFJ against comex. E violated rule 1742 by
violating the requirements of several of the Mr. Monopoly and Rich
Uncle Pennybags series of partnerships to
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 10:44:05 Quazie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:27 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I make the following contract with the AFO
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I object. You should at least make it a public contract first.
Grumble,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lx Ntwthy dtplt #79 Digit Ranch (4)
I change the name of the above land to: 4 Crop
land #80 Digit Ranch (6)
I change the name of the above
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quazie wrote:
W3O Add the following after point 3.and renumbering it and every point
after it appropriatly:
#. A valid ballot is defined as a ballot that indicates at least 1
proposal that is a best fit for a given category
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:47 PM, ihope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attempt to learn grammar and spelling.
TIYAEOTISIDTIDFTHPAFALT.
This is your atypical example
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:47 PM, ihope wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attempt to learn grammar and spelling
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I revise my votes.
5560 O1 1Quazie A monstrous win
AGAINSTx4
I'm going to consider this a reasonable synonym of I retract my votes
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Alexander Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 2019 ==
Human Point Two bears the patent title Minister Without
Portfolio
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:00 AM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I CFJ on the statement:
* The hypothetical contract in the evidence section, if made a
contest, would be effective, because neither Rule 101 (vi.) nor Rule
478 would prevent its operation.
Evidence:
{{
At the end of each
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea sounds fun. Would the players find out that they lost/gained
points per message or per week? If they learned per message would
they learn publicly
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:34 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Mao, I guess. With all the rights I'm trying to dodge, you might
wonder if this is best suited for a game independent from Agora.
I'm not worried
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/24 Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Be It So Ordered.
-Goethe
This is the best judgement I've ever read.
ehird
I never understood orders see CFJs 1543-1545 1555-1557.
a-df (sorry about sending that to backup)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: BAK: Teh Cltohed Mna Ni Teh Drak Woh Wtaches Adn Nevre
Sasy A Wrod Execpt Wehn Psoessed Yb Dmeons Mcuhly Precocupied
To: Agora Nomic
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
I intend (without objection) to amend the Werewolves contract by
replacing voting period with voting period (not an Agoran decision)
in section 10b (or 3b, if my previous intent to renumber sections has
been carried
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/24 Alexander Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I act on behalf of ehird to act on behalf of Teh Cltohed Mna Ni
Teh Drak Woh Wtaches Adn Nevre Sasy A Wrod Execpt Wehn Psoessed
Yb Dmeons Mcuhly Precocupied to transfer land #86
of removing 3 points from Quazie on Jun 17, 2008 at
12:00 PM BobTHJ must create a mill, other than land #98, in
Quazie's possession or BobTHJ is in violation of the AAA
contract
Conflict of interest be damned
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Ben Caplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 11:36:02 Roger Hicks wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I change the Manroster to
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ehird wrote:
I agree to the following, which actually works:
{
This is a pledge.
Anything may act on behalf of ehird by announcement.
}
As authorized by this contract, I act on behalf of ehird to cast eir
Werewolves
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ehird wrote:
I agree to the following, which actually works:
{
This is a pledge.
Anything may act on behalf of ehird by announcement.
}
As authorized
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You seem to be inviolation of the contract:
13) The contestmaster SHALL NOT disclose the following, except as
required:
a) Whether a member
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gratuitous: In Gmail which doesn't easily do fixed width font, it
doesn't look like a word to me.
Further
Where does it say in the rules that a person can't be more than one
player? I can't seem to find that any where, though I though it was a
rule (and must have been a rule at one point due to previous crises)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quazie wrote:
Where does it say in the rules that a person can't be more than one
player?
It has long been customary that the player *is* the person. Playerhood is
an attribute of persons (actually, also of non-persons now
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comex wrote:
That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e.
a picture of Phoenix Wright) but I do not know of any such pictures.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, I wish I could have had some more inventive ASCII art (i.e.
a picture of Phoenix
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goethe wrote:
By the above, Murphy's title of MwoP is administratively revoked.
The long reign of Speaker Murphy has come to an end!
All hail Speaker root!
Claim of error: If Human Point Two still bears MwoP, then it was
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goethe wrote:
By the above, Murphy's title of MwoP is administratively revoked.
The long reign of Speaker Murphy has come to an end!
All hail Speaker
Non-first-class: Association of Federated Organizations
Left Hand
PerlNomic Partnership
Pineapple Partnership (standing)
Protection Racket
Reformed Bank of Agora
COE where is HP2?
This is a very proto judgement, more me speaking my mind on the issues
before I come up with a full judgement. This judgement is known to be
incomplete and potentially incoherent. This will be fixed before real
judging occurs.
== CFJ 2040
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote:
This CFJ seems to be FALSE. Why should a member of a partnership
incur obligations when the partnership's obligations devolve onto em.
Um, because that's very the definition
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote:
This CFJ seems to be FALSE. Why should a member of a partnership
incur
1 - 100 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
