What problem are you trying to solve? How would you want referenced or
userused@... to work?
To be more clear: space shared between a clone and its origin is
referenced by both the clone and the origin, so it is charged to both the
clone's and origin's userused@... properties. The additional
I don't think accurate equations are applicable in this case.
You can have estimates like no more/no less than X based on,
basically, level of redundancy and its overhead. ZFS metadata
overhead can also be smaller or bigger, depending on your data's
typical block size (fixed for zvols at
The subject says it all.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
zfs 'userused@' properties and 'zfs userspace' command are good enough to
gather usage statistics.
I think I mix that with NetApp. If my memory is correct, we have to set quotas
to get usage statistics under DataOnTAP.
Further, if we can add
I jump into this loop with different alternative -- ip-based block device.
And I saw few successful cases with HAST + UCARP + ZFS + FreeBSD.
If zfsonlinux is robust enough, trying DRBD + PACEMAKER + ZFS + LINUX is
definitely encouraged.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From:
“zfs 'userused@' properties” and “'zfs userspace' command” are good enough to
gather usage statistics.
I think I mix that with NetApp. If my memory is correct, we have to set quotas
to get usage statistics under DataOnTAP.
Further, if we can add an ILM-like feature to poll the time-related
2012/4/26 Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com
Currently, dedup/compression is pool-based right now, they don't have the
granularity on file system or user or group level. There is also a lot of
improving space in this aspect.
Compression is not pool-based, you can control it with the 'compression
On 2012-04-26 11:27, Fred Liu wrote:
zfs 'userused@' properties and 'zfs userspace' command are good
enough to gather usage statistics.
...
Since no one is focusing on enabling default user/group quota now, the
temporarily remedy could be a script which traverse all the
users/groups
On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Yes.
Thanks.
I am not aware of anyone looking into this.
I don't think it is very hard, per se. But such quotas don't fit well with the
notion of many file systems. There might be some restricted use cases
where it makes good sense, but I'm
it
without setting
such quotas?
Thanks.
Fred
_
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期三, 四月 25, 2012 20:05
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org
Cc: 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org'
Subject: RE: [developer] Setting default user/group quotas[usage accounting]?
On Apr 24, 2012
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期二, 四月 24, 2012 11:41
To: develo...@lists.illumos.org
Subject: Setting default user/group quotas?
It seems this feature is still not there yet. Any plan to do it? Or is it hard
to do it?
Thanks.
Fred
Yes. I understand. I have been seeking for long time to enable SES in
my home server
which is comprised of commodity hardwares. But I have got no luck.
I will try sg3_utils if possible.
Many thanks.
Fred
在 2012年4月10日 下午4:52，Mike Pumford mpumf...@mpcdata.com 写道：
Fred Liu wrote:
Thanks. Can you
-- 已转发邮件 --
发件人： Fred Liu fred.f...@gmail.com
日期： 2012年4月9日 下午3:56
主题： Re: SAS Drive identification LEDs
收件人： Mike Pumford mpumf...@mpcdata.com
Thanks. Can you recommend what drive and enclosure can provide working
SES in 9.0?
Thanks.
Fred
在 2012年3月30日 下午5:18，Mike Pumford
How would you identify such a drive on any other system?
Normally, there are printed labels as the backup solution.
Thanks.
Fred
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Looks really beautiful...
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Magda
Sent: 星期二, 一月 17, 2012 8:06
To: zfs-discuss
Subject: [zfs-discuss] Windows 8 ReFS (OT)
Kind of off topic, but I figured of
Is there an english version?
Thanks
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Volker A. Brandt [mailto:v...@bb-c.de]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 5:04 PM
To: Andrey Sokolov
Cc: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The lx brand for OpenIndiana 151a
Hello Andrey!
Hi,
Is it also possible to enable SR-IOV in KVM-on-Illumos?
Thanks.
Fred
---
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your
Any progress on autofs now?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezc...@free.fr]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:48 AM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lxc-users] autofs in lxc containers?
On 06/25/2011 04:45 PM, Fred Liu
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
... so when will zfs-related improvement make it to solaris-
derivatives :D ?
I am also very curious about Oracle's policy about source code. ;-)
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Paul,
Thanks.
I understand now.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kraus
Sent: 星期一, 十月 24, 2011 22:38
To: ZFS Discussions
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] FS Reliability WAS: about btrfs and
Some people have trained their fingers to use the -f option on every
command that supports it to force the operation. For instance, how
often do you do rm -rf vs. rm -r and answer questions about every
file?
If various zpool commands (import, create, replace, etc.) are used
against the
3. Do NOT let a system see drives with more than one OS zpool at the
same time (I know you _can_ do this safely, but I have seen too many
horror stories on this list that I just avoid it).
Can you elaborate #3? In what situation will it happen?
Thanks.
Fred
R.I.P Dennis.
-Original Message-
From: Apostolos Syropoulos [mailto:asyropou...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 星期四, 十月 13, 2011 19:55
To: openindiana; lista solaris
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Dennis Ritchie
A very very sad for the world of computing:
Dennis Ritchie, co-creator of Unix and
Hi,
For my carelessness, I added two disks into a raid-z2 zpool as normal data
disk, but in fact
I want to make them as zil devices.
Any remedy solutions?
Many thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
That's a huge bummer, and it's the main reason why device removal has
been a
priority request for such a long time... There is no solution. You
can
only destroy recreate your pool, or learn to live with it that way.
Sorry...
Yeah, I also realized this when I send out this message.
This one missing feature of ZFS, IMHO, does not result in a long way
for
zfs to go in relation to netapp. I shut off my netapp 2 years ago in
favor
of ZFS, because ZFS performs so darn much better, and has such
immensely
greater robustness. Try doing ndmp, cifs, nfs, iscsi on netapp
You can add mirrors to those lonely disks.
Can it repair the pool?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I'll tell you what does not help. This email. Now that you know what
you're trying to do, why don't you post the results of your zpool
import command? How about an error message, and how you're trying to
go about fixing your pool? Nobody here can help you without
information.
User
I also used zpool import -fFX cn03 in b134 and b151a(via live SX11 live cd). It
resulted a core dump and reboot after about 15 min.
I can see all the leds are blinking on the HDD within this 15 min.
Can replacing empty ZIL devices help?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
100% done: 1041082 pages dumped, dump succeeded
rebooting...
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:00
To: Fred Liu; 'Edward Ned Harvey'; 'Krunal Desai'
Cc: 'zfs
I use opensolaris b134.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:21
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:10
You don't mention which OS you are using, but for the past 5 years of
[Open]Solaris
releases, the system prints a warning message and will not allow this
to occur
without using the force option (-f).
-- richard
Yes. There is a warning message, I used zpool add -f.
Thanks.
Fred
c22t5d0 ONLINE
Additional devices are known to be part of this pool, though their
exact configuration cannot be determined.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期一, 九月 19, 2011 22:28
To: 'Richard Elling'
Cc: zfs-discuss
No, but your pool is not imported.
YES. I see.
and look to see which disk is missing?
The label, as displayed by zdb -l contains the heirarchy of the
expected pool config.
The contents are used to build the output you see in the zpool import
or zpool status
commands. zpool is
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 3:57
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] remove wrongly added device from zpool
more below…
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Fred Liu wrote
LABEL 2
failed to unpack label 2
LABEL 3
failed to unpack label 3
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 4:06
c4t500151795910D221d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
Thanks.
Fred
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期二, 九月 20, 2011 9:23
To: Tony Kim; 'Richard Elling'
Subject: all the history
Hi,
Following is the history:
The whole history is I found a ZIL device offline at about
Adding Karsten in this list...
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Alan Coopersmith [mailto:alan.coopersm...@oracle.com]
Sent: 星期五, 九月 16, 2011 7:33
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenCDE in OpenIndiana
On 09/15/11 09:18, Gary wrote:
Great! Glad to hear it. ;-)
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:tr...@netdemons.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 4:20 PM
To: discuss@lists.illumos.org
Cc: Garrett D'Amore
Subject: Re: [discuss] I'm back!
On 9/2/2011 10:48 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Are you on the
The only way you will know of decrypting and decompressing causes a
problem in that case is if you try it on your systems. I seriously
doubt it will be unless the system is already heavily CPU bound and
your
backup window is already very tight.
That is true.
My understanding of the
The ZFS Send stream is at the DMU layer at this layer the data is
uncompress and decrypted - ie exactly how the application wants it.
Even the data compressed/encrypted by ZFS will be decrypted? If it is true,
will it be any CPU overhead?
And ZFS send/receive tunneled by ssh becomes the
Yes, which is exactly what I said.
All data as seen by the DMU is decrypted and decompressed, the DMU
layer
is what the ZPL layer is built ontop of so it has to be that way.
Understand. Thank you. ;-)
There is always some overhead for doing a decryption and decompression,
the
-Original Message-
From: David Magda [mailto:dma...@ee.ryerson.ca]
Sent: 星期二, 六月 28, 2011 10:41
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Bill Sommerfeld; ZFS Discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Encryption accelerator card
recommendations.[GPU acceleration of ZFS]
On Jun 27, 2011, at 22:03, Fred Liu
FYI There is another thread named -- GPU acceleration of ZFS in this
list to discuss the possibility to utilize the power of GPGPU.
I posted here:
Good day,
I think ZFS can take advantage of using GPU for sha256 calculation, encryption
and maybe compression. Modern video card, like 5xxx or
In brief, I cloned a bootable SATA disk from the VMware (now
discontinued) Sun Unified Storage simulator, and then created the
graphics and definitions to match a Supermicro 4U chassis and system
board.
Everything worked exactly as a real one would, including disk locator
led's, disk
zpool status -x output would be useful. These error reports do not
include a
pointer to the faulty device. fmadm can also give more info.
Yes. Thanks.
mpathadm can be used to determine the device paths for this disk.
Notice how the disk is offline at multiple times. There is some sort
Mark,
Can you post the content of your blog in this list?
Many thanks.
look here.
http://stored-on-zfs.blogspot.com
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:mark0...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期五, 六月 24, 2011 16:24
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re:
look here.
http://stored-on-zfs.blogspot.com
Ooops, it is blocked by Great Wall firewall! Too frustrated.
Anyway, thanks.
Fred
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
As an aside, I have built a fully functional 7210 Unified Storage
Server Clone running on Supermicro hardware and some customised
definitions in the management software to match the new hardware.
That setup fully supported drive locator and failure indications, so the
generic hardware can do it
Hi,
Anyone who successfully run autofs in lxc containers?
Thanks.
Fred
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期四, 六月 16, 2011 17:28
To: Fred Liu; 'Richard Elling'
Cc: 'Jim Klimov'; 'zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org'
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
Fixing a typo in my last thread...
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
This message is from the disk saying that it aborted a command. These
are
usually preceded by a reset, as shown here. What caused the reset
condition?
Was it actually target 11 or did target 11 get caught up in the reset
storm?
It happed in the mid-night and nobody touched the file box.
I
Fixing a typo in my last thread...
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期四, 六月 16, 2011 17:22
To: 'Richard Elling'
Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
This message is from the disk saying that it aborted a command
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期三, 六月 15, 2011 14:25
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
On Jun 14, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
-Original
This is only true if the pool is not protected. Please protect your
pool with mirroring or raidz*.
-- richard
Yes. We use a raidz2 without any spares. In theory, with one disk broken,
there should be no problem. But in reality, we saw NFS service interrupted:
Jun 9 23:28:59 cn03
What is the difference between warm spares and hot spares?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I assume the history is stored in the meta data. Is it possible to configure
how long/much history can be stored/displayed?
I know it is doable via external/additional automation like porting to a
database.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Hi,
Anyone who is successfully poll the zpool/zfs properties thrun SNMP?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
-Original Message-
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期三, 六月 15, 2011 11:59
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Jim Klimov; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs global hot spares?
On Jun 14, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
What
Hi,
We have met this yesterday. The degraded pool was exported and I had to
re-import it manually.
Is it a normal case? I assume it should not be but
Has anyone met the similar case?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Just want to share with you. We have found and been suffering from some weird
issues because of
it. It is better to connect them directly to the sata ports on the mainboard.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
What is current status of LX64?
Thanks.
Fred
___
brandz-discuss mailing list
brandz-discuss@opensolaris.org
Oh. It seems fewer people can do the continuing developing jobs outside Oracle
neither.
What a pity!
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Frank Batschulat [mailto:frank.batschu...@oracle.com]
Sent: 星期二, 六月 07, 2011 0:58
To: Fred Liu; brandz-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re
Hi,
Any continuing developing jobs about LX64 done here?
Thanks.
Fred
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Yes, I have already installed it.
-Original Message-
From: Julien Cristau [mailto:jcris...@debian.org]
Sent: 星期五, 四月 29, 2011 15:41
To: Fred Liu
Cc: X.Org Developers
Subject: Re: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(X, xproto)'?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 21:22:45 -0700, Fred Liu wrote:
Hi,
I
]
Sent: 星期五, 四月 29, 2011 19:54
To: Fred Liu
Cc: X.Org Developers
Subject: Re: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(X, xproto)'?
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 21:22 -0700, Fred Liu wrote:
Hi,
I am following the instruction from Building all modules with the build
scripts to build X11R76 as following:
util/modular
Hi,
I am following the instruction from Building all modules with the build
scripts to build X11R76 as following:
util/modular/build.sh $PREFIX
...
...
./configure: line 4899: syntax error near unexpected token `X,'
./configure: line 4899: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(X, xproto)'
build.sh: autogen.sh
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com]
Sent: 星期二, 四月 26, 2011 12:47
To: Ian Collins
Cc: Fred Liu; ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work
with quota?
On 4/25/2011 6:23 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 04/26/11
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:07 AM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Ian Collins; ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work with quota?
On 4/26/2011 3:59 AM, Fred Liu wrote
-Original Message-
From: Erik Trimble [mailto:erik.trim...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:06 AM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Ian Collins; ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work with quota?
On 4/26/2011 9:29 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
From: Erik
Cindy,
Following is quoted from ZFS Dedup FAQ:
Deduplicated space accounting is reported at the pool level. You must use the
zpool list command rather than the zfs list command to identify disk space
consumption when dedup is enabled. If you use the zfs list command to review
deduplicated
:50
To: Fred Liu
Cc: cindy.swearin...@oracle.com; ZFS discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] How does ZFS dedup space accounting work
with quota?
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
So how can I set the quota size on a file system with dedup enabled?
I believe
Hi,
I have found this feature is planned in version 2.4 and beyond from the
roadmap.
But I am very interested in it.
Are there already any stuff(idea, code, or algorithm .. etc)?
If possible, I may contribute in this aspect.
Many thanks.
Fred
Andrew and Code Monkey,
Thank you very much.
The reason why we still stick to CentOS3.9 is the some legacy software running
on it are still needed by our business.
And just like what you said, I tried and got no luck today.
I also found a HINT --
Hi,
I want build latest GNU tools running in CentOS3.9(kernel 2.4,glibc 2.3) via
CLFS.
Is it doable?
Thanks.
Fred
___
Clfs-support mailing list
Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
Thanks.
But does noacal work with nfs v3?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Hanover [mailto:chano...@umich.edu]
Sent: 星期四, 三月 17, 2011 1:34
To: Fred Liu
Cc: ZFS Discussions
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-
NFS
I thought
Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS after
Solaris11 release.
If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different directions.
BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
road...
Thanks.
Fred
-Original
Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS after
Solaris11 release.
If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different directions.
BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
road...
Thanks.
Fred
-Original
Always show info like 'operation not supported'.
Any workaround?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
It is from ZFS ACL.
Thanks.
Fred
From: Fred Liu
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:57 PM
To: ZFS Discussions
Subject: GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS
Always show info like 'operation not supported'.
Any workaround?
Thanks.
Fred
Liu
Cc: ZFS Discussions
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well with ZFS-based-NFS's ACL
Use the Solaris cp (/usr/bin/cp) instead
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
It is from ZFS ACL.
Thanks.
Fred
From: Fred Liu
Sent: Wednesday, March
Sorry. I put post in cc.
I use NFSv3(linux 2.4 kernel) coreutils-8.9.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: David Magda [mailto:dma...@ee.ryerson.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:29 PM
To: Fred Liu
Cc: ZFS Discussions
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] GNU 'cp -p' can't work well
Hi,
Is it possible to run both CIFS and NFS on one file system over ZFS?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Tim,
Thanks.
Is there a mapping mechanism like what DataOnTap does to map the permission/acl
between NIS/LDAP and AD?
Thanks.
Fred
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Sent: 星期日, 三月 13, 2011 9:53
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] dual protocal on one
developers.
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: vbox-dev-boun...@virtualbox.org [mailto:vbox-dev-
boun...@virtualbox.org] On Behalf Of Brian Johnson
Sent: 星期五, 三月 04, 2011 7:21
To: vbox-dev@virtualbox.org
Subject: Re: [vbox-dev] Any plan to support SR-IOV?
Fred Liu Fred_Liu
Hi,
Has anyone met this?
I meet this every time just like somebody steps on brake paddle suddenly and
release it in the car.
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
Subject says it all.
Thanks.
Fred
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in
Rocky,
Can individuals buy your products in the retail market?
Thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Rocky Shek
Sent: 星期五, 一月 28, 2011 7:02
To: 'Pasi Kärkkäinen'
Cc: 'Philip Brown';
Khushil,
Thanks.
Fred
From: Khushil Dep [mailto:khushil@gmail.com]
Sent: 星期一, 一月 31, 2011 17:37
To: Fred Liu
Cc: Rocky Shek; Pasi Kärkkäinen; Philip Brown; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] reliable, enterprise worthy JBODs?
You should also check out VA Technologies
I do the same with ACARD…
Works well enough.
Fred
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jason Warr
Sent: 星期四, 十二月 30, 2010 8:56
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] SAS/short stroking vs. SSDs for ZIL
ACARD 9010 is good enough in this aspect, if you need extremely high iops...
Fred
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble
Sent: 星期四, 十二月 23, 2010 14:36
To: Christopher George
Cc:
ACARD 9010 is good enough in this aspect, if you DON'T need extremely high
IOPS...
Sorry for the typo.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Fred Liu
Sent: 星期四, 十二月 23, 2010 15:30
To: 'Erik Trimble'; Christopher George
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] Looking
Failed zil devices will also cause this...
Fred
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Wolfram Tomalla
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:40 PM
To: Frank Van Damme
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] very
I haven't tested them, but we're using multi-terabyte iscsi volumes now, so I
don't really see what could be different. The only possible issue I know of, is
that 3TB drives uses 4k sectors, which might not be optimal in all environments.
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
3TB HDD needs UEFI not
Hi,
Anyone who has experience with 3TB HDD in ZFS? Can solaris recognize this new
HDD?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi,
Anyone who has the experience of Texas Memory Systems's RamSan in ZFS?
Thanks.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/index.html
Good stuff for ZFS.
Fred
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] WarpDrive SLP-300
On 18/11/10 01:49 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
http://www.lsi.com/channel/about_channel/whatsnew/warpdrive_slp300/inde
x.html
Good stuff for ZFS.
Looks a bit like the Sun/Oracle Flash Accelerator card,
only
Sure. Gotcha! ^:^
-Original Message-
From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
Sent: 星期四, 十一月 18, 2010 13:16
To: Fred Liu
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] WarpDrive SLP-300
On 18/11/10 03:05 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Yeah, no driver issue.
BTW
201 - 300 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
