Hello,
Sorry to ask here, but it seems to be the most appropriate place for it.
When looking at my statistics I noticed that the number of spams is always
lower than the number of passed clean emails. I was happy with this fo
rthe longest time, despite the feeling that something is not
On 10/22/06, techlist06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am already tagging potential spam. Is there a relatively easy way I can
tag messages with the image spam, specifically the gif/animated gif's as
spam? I considered blocking them altogether, but figured that might be too
drastic. I'd like to
/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20061023-1005
/etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
/tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus-virus-warnings.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus-virus-warnings.cf.20061023-1005
/etc/mail/spamassassin
failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf
/tmp/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20061023-1005
/etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bogus
Rocco Scappatura schrieb:
Hello,
I have tried to run SA with debug option to get some further insight, but
commands does not return:
/etc/mail/spamassassin # spamassassin -D -lint
[28005] warn: The -l option has been deprecated and is no longer supported,
ignoring.
spamassassin -D
Voytek,
FWIW, I've installed FuzzyOCR maybe 2 or 3 weeks ago, I think... it
sometimes works, though, I don't get the same results as README/samples
suggest
so, perhaps, GIF block is a better alternative...
Hard blocking may be too harsh, some mailing lists and company mail
add logos and
On 10/23/06, Peter Huetmannsberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is therefore. Is there a way to leave the mails form spamalert
to spam-police out of the statistics, to create a truer picture of the
ratio spam:ham mails?
are you talking about this amavis-stats ?
-f /etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf
/tmp/RulesDuJour/99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/tripwire.cf.20061023-1005
/etc/mail/spamassassin/tripwire.cf; mv -f
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
/tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus-virus-warnings.cf.2; mv -f
/tmp/RulesDuJour/bogus
Sorry,
/etc/mail/spamassassin # spamassassin -D -lint [28005] warn: The -l
option has been deprecated and is no longer supported, ignoring.
spamassassin -D --lint
^^
u forgot one -
You're right..
Here my output..
/etc/mail/spamassassin #
Hello,
failed to
parse line, skipping: body id=pg1
a guess: it seems u have copied and pasted some wrong lines, your
config is broken?
It does not seem to me..
Can someone give me an hint about how to solve this problem?
Show your rulesdujour config?
Here my simple
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 11:01 +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
It's many days that rule do jour try to update rules of spamassassin bat
without success..
rulesemporium.com let their domain lapse, and you have probably cached
bad data before they got their domain re-registered. I find
Christophe,
I use amavis-new-2.4.3 on a classic postfix-linux box, all SPAM are well
tagged and combination with DCC, razor, and pyzor works fine too. All Works
fine except mails which are rewritted ( in case of forwarding mail which
postfix canonical) are not tagged, and so I relay some spam
Peter,
This morning it dawned on me, that every rejected spam creates a
legitimate (passed clean) mail, i.e. the one sent to the spam-admin
notifying me of spam being quarantined.
This changes the picture completely and makes the numbers look more than
80% spam and 20 % real mails.
My
Hmm,
thank you for your help, but I am afraid, I am still using sendmail with
the milter setup, so that doesn't do it for me.
Thanks again,
.peter
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Mark Martinec wrote:
Peter,
This morning it dawned on me, that every rejected spam creates a
legitimate (passed
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:50:21PM -0400, Ricardo Stella ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I've been pushing for some time to get up-to-date and valid user
listsings autoupdated for some time, but it's been way to slow...
The thing was that allowing only valid users
Hello list,
I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact. There
are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
Versions:
SA 3.1.7
Amavisd-new 2.3.3
Should I include the updated rules in /etc/spamassasin/local.cf as mentioned
in the SA website?
include
Peter Huetmannsberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, John wrote:
Hello list,
I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact.
There
are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
Versions:
SA 3.1.7
John,
I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact.
There are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
Versions: SA 3.1.7, Amavisd-new 2.3.3
These versions are fine, sa-update should work out of the box,
no special options or actions are needed, just let
Peter,
I am not sure, taht what I do is correct, but then who cares if it works.
I run a daily cronjob as user amavis with the following command line:
/usr/bin/sa-update --updatedir /usr/share/spamassassin/ --gpghomedir \
/var/amavis/
I've been doing this initially, but people on SA list
Mark Martinec [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John,
Mark,
Thanx for the quick response
I'm confused on how Amavisd-new and Spamassassin sa-update interact.
There are several previous posts that didn't clear things by me.
Versions: SA 3.1.7, Amavisd-new 2.3.3
John,
So after sa-update I should also execute an /etc/init.d/amavisd
restart and I'm fine?
Yes. (or 'amavisd reload')
Mark
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
Rocco Scappatura schrieb:
I don't understand. Could you explain better? Tnx
---
error-message:
Lint output: [6587] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Jose,
By filtering I mean the spam lover's messages are being deposited in
the quarantine directory.
I've spoken with the person involved and they say they're receiving
more spam (and loving it). But I haven't compared his messages in
the quarantine directory to his delivered messages yet.
Wayne,
I ran into the lmtp bug with 2.4.2 (and hence had a lot of spam messages
queued for bouncing). Upgraded to 2.4.3 and that issue is gone
Yes, there was a bug in LMTP processing in 2.4.2.
but it would appear now that the
folks who score low enough for us to send the extremely rare
Hello,
Amavisd-new goes in error after a few time that it starts..
After raising verbosity of amavis-milter I have seen the following
entries in milter logs:
Oct 23 18:59:51 av3 amavis-milter[4149]: amavis-milter: thread_create()
failed: 11, try again
What it means? It is this the cause of my
Hi all,
Running:
SuSE10.0
Postfix 2.2.5-5
Amavis-new 2.3.3-5
ClamAv 0.88.5-0.1
Lately very often our users complain that they have received an email without
an attachment.
When i check the logs i can't find any error/warning messages except for a
BAD-HEADER message (which i let pass by
Johan,
Lately very often our users complain that they have received an email
without an attachment.
When i check the logs i can't find any error/warning messages except for a
BAD-HEADER message (which i let pass by default).
In the beginning i told the users that the email arrived with a bad
Hello,
I get the following error..
Oct 23 20:08:36 av3 sendmail[30415]: k9NI8aeJ030415: Milter
(milter-amavis): local socket name /var/amavis/amavis-milter.sock unsafe
Oct 23 20:08:36 av3 sendmail[30415]: k9NI8aeJ030415: Milter
(milter-amavis): to error state
What I can be?
Thanks,
rocsca
Sorry..
It Was a my error while starting amavisd-new (I've commented the name of socket
where amavis-milter have to bind..)
Sorry again..
rocsca
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto
di Rocco Scappatura
Inviato: lunedì 23 ottobre 2006
Op maandag 23 oktober 2006 20:08, schreef Mark Martinec:
Johan,
Lately very often our users complain that they have received an email
without an attachment.
When i check the logs i can't find any error/warning messages except for
a BAD-HEADER message (which i let pass by default).
In
Mark,
On Mon, October 23, 2006 11:54 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jo Rhett writes:
Your first sample came across somewhat mangled (adjecent header fields
joined and wrapped), but as far I can tell, it is missing the
final --=_20061019092239_46584-- line.
Here is another bad-header message -
Hi, all...
I have been having an odd problem with a couple of servers running
AMAVISD, and am looking for some insight/guidance. I have been receiving
(intermittently, but often in bunches) SPAM that *claims* to be from a
user on the host that is actually processing the mail. This supposed
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 03:09:07PM -0400, Mark Burdick wrote:
When message is finally delivered to jsmith, it *appears* to be from
something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Yet, this information isn't
inside the message itself.
This sounds like a common MTA configuration issue. The mail comes in
Mike,
Here is another bad-header message - hopefully in one piece and complete.
This one looks fine (after unfolding the two wrapped header lines), and
doesn't bring any complaints from my amavisd/MIME::Parser (version 5.420).
Which version of MIME::Parser do you have (it is logged at amavisd
Rocco,
Amavisd-new goes in error after a few time that it starts..
Process amavisd or process amavis-milter? Looks like the later.
After raising verbosity of amavis-milter I have seen the following
entries in milter logs:
Oct 23 18:59:51 av3 amavis-milter[4149]: amavis-milter:
Hello list,
I'm preparing a specfile for amavisd-new 2.4.3 on SuSE and I not sure what
the minimal requirement of Perl::Net::Server is for use with
Amavisd-new-2.4.3. My current 2.3.3 setup is running happely with
perl::Net::Server 0.88. Is this suffient for Amavisd-new 2.4.3 (Postfix /
non
John,
I'm preparing a specfile for amavisd-new 2.4.3 on SuSE and I not sure what
the minimal requirement of Perl::Net::Server is for use with
Amavisd-new-2.4.3. My current 2.3.3 setup is running happely with
perl::Net::Server 0.88. Is this suffient for Amavisd-new 2.4.3 (Postfix /
non milter
On Oct 23, 2006, at 7:12 AM, Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
I run a daily cronjob as user amavis with the following command line:
/usr/bin/sa-update --updatedir /usr/share/spamassassin/ --gpghomedir \
/var/amavis/
You have to make sure that amvais can write in /usr/share/
spamassassin, so
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:54 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jo Rhett writes:
By default the configuration says that x-msdownload is a bad header.
Comment out that line from the configuration.
Wrong answer. x-msdownload could be a banned component of a message,
but is not a bad header. Bad headers
We have been having an issue with our Postfix mail server running
amavis-new with SpamAssassin and ClamAV, in that mail is either not
delivered or seriously delayed (more than 3 days at times). I noticed
the following error in my mail log:
Oct 23 22:24:12 dencoit03 postfix/smtp[13567] : connect
40 matches
Mail list logo
