On 05/08/2015 04:48 PM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 08:50 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 22 apr. 2015, om 23:39 heeft Marcel Ziswiler
marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com het volgende geschreven:
As you might know we at Toradex are using the Angstrom Distribution
quite extensively
On 10/03/2014 02:33 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
I have a number of systems on my desk (Wifi accesspoints mainly) and a few I
want to buy (Arduino galileo, Intel edison) where the current angstrom config
just doesn't fit. My plan is to add a config to deal with those systems and
is binary
On 05/05/2014 03:05 PM, Bob Feretich wrote:
Is there a document that provides a detailed definition of what each
these tasks do?
Yocto, OE, and bitbake manuals tell us how to command a specific task to
be run, but not what they do.
I'd send this to yo...@yoctoproject.org since it is a general
On 01/17/2014 02:00 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
It looks like the some of the u-boot recipes in meta-ti are broken.
They do not include COMPATIBLE_MACHINE statements,
so when building u-boot for non-ti machines, this recipe is choosen
instead.
This includes the u-boot 13.01 recipe
Should
On 11/22/2013 09:28 AM, Tim wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get started with an Angstrom toolchain for Beaglebone
development, and I notice that this link seems to be
broken.http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/simplified-development-setup
On 10/27/2013 12:53 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 18:30 +0200, Björn Krombholz wrote:
On 10/20/2013 09:04 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Then I noticed that the 'genericarmv7a' machine in meta-linaro set
the DEFAULTTUNE to armv7athf-neon. A MACHINE config shouldn't set
that variable, but
On 10/23/2013 11:42 PM, Edward Vidal wrote:
Hello Chris,
I have been working with Yocto for beaglebone, beagleboard, pandaboard and
now with the zedboard. I have tried angstrom but found yocto to be a
better approach for me. For the zedboard I need to linux systems a
Angstrom is Yocto
On 10/20/2013 05:49 PM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
20 okt 2013 kl. 21:04 skrev Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net:
Hi,
A while ago we decided to switch armv7a machines for hardfloat because we
were worn it with explaining that there's no real world difference between
softfp (which does
On 10/09/2013 11:29 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
All,
The Angstrom v2013.12 release branch was opened today. This release will
match the Yocto Project 1.5 release. Patches are very welcome, but keep in
mind that it's not
On 03/22/2013 06:41 AM, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
2013/3/22 Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net:
Op 21 mrt. 2013, om 18:33 heeft Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com
het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
I'm currently working on an home automation project (calaos), which
uses angstrom and
On 03/21/2013 11:33 AM, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on an home automation project (calaos), which
uses angstrom and oe-core + my own recipes [1][2]. I maitains a set
of machine for this project :
n450
cubieboard
mele a1000/2000
cubox
olinuxino-a13
rasberry-pi
Can you post the stuff at the start of the build log so we know what
layers/branches/versions are being built?
Philip
On 01/17/2013 02:33 PM, David Lambert wrote:
I am not sure whether this is a Beaglebone or Angstrom issue, so I am
posting it to both:
Over the past couple of weeks I have
On 12/19/2012 02:06 AM, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
On 19 December 2012 05:09, Peter Kurrasch gtin...@hotmail.com wrote:
Previously...
I only switched the branch of setup-scripts to
angstrom-v2012.12-yocto1.3. Because in master bitbake systemd-image
-c populate_sdk doesn't work at all (as the
On 12/11/2012 04:08 PM, Alan DuBoff wrote:
Is there an easy way to include the boost headers for cross compiling
within bitbake?
Boost should just work, as long as your recipe DEPENDS on it.
Philip
--
Regards,
Alan
___
Angstrom-distro-devel
On 08/30/2012 09:00 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 aug. 2012, om 01:27 heeft Wes Erhart wes...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
My local.conf. Note the comment in front of INHERIT += rm_work -- I won't
won't or want?
to keep the files around to use as a cross compile environment. (If you
On 08/26/2012 01:07 PM, anky mishra wrote:
Hi,
Im new to Angstrom. I have ported Angstrom to Beagle Board xM. Now i want
to create a program that will run automatically (without having to use the
GUI), the code will be Multitasking based..
However i cannot find any reference manual for
On 05/03/2012 05:49 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
The process to add machines is fairly simple:
1) Find the layer for the machine in
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/LayerIndex
2) Check the setup scripts to see if it's already configured
3) Send patch for setupscripts
4) Send patch for narcissus
On 04/18/2012 11:12 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On 18/04/12 16:08, Koen Kooi wrote:
What the default branch for the setup-scripts is after the release (master
or release branch) is up for discussion on this list :)
Release!
Lets keep the beginners off the cutting edge!
Also still getting
On 03/27/2012 07:57 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On 27/03/2012 12:55, Philip Balister wrote:
On 03/27/2012 04:14 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 26 mrt. 2012, om 22:02 heeft Jacek Radzikowski het volgende geschreven:
That turned to be easier than I thought. How can I commit
On 03/10/2012 07:41 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
Koen == Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net writes:
Koen Op 9 mrt. 2012, om 23:28 heeft Russell Senior het volgende
Koen geschreven:
This appears to be a missing cross-compiling gfortran?
Koen Actually no, it will fail to build if you have
Remove it from the image you are building.
Philip
On 03/10/2012 11:36 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
what is the easiest way to turn off the numpy build?
On Mar 10, 2012 2:34 PM, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote:
On 03/10/2012 07:41 PM, Russell Senior wrote:
Koen == Koen Kooi k
On 02/20/2012 04:31 AM, Christophe Aeschlimann wrote:
On 17.02.2012 19:08, Philip Balister wrote:
On 02/17/2012 04:06 AM, Christophe Aeschlimann wrote:
On 17.02.2012 12:13, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
2012/2/17 Christophe Aeschlimann c.aeschlim...@acn-group.ch:
Hi and thank you for your
On 02/17/2012 04:06 AM, Christophe Aeschlimann wrote:
On 17.02.2012 12:13, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
2012/2/17 Christophe Aeschlimann c.aeschlim...@acn-group.ch:
Hi and thank you for your suggestion.
I had a look at this oe-core recipe and it would definitely fit my
rootfs size requirement
As we enter the OE-Core universe, I think it is a good time to think
about where the Angstrom Distribution needs to focus its efforts.
Currently, the most user visible feature of Angstrom is the availability
of binary feeds so end users can add packages via the internet easily.
Some ideas:
1)
On 01/11/2012 05:06 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
Hi
feels like angstrom git server is down:
| git pull
| fatal: Unable to look up git.angstrom-distribution.org (port 9418) (Name or
service not known)
Also opening
http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/
This worked for me just now.
Try asking on the beagle list. There are more Beagle people there.
Philip
On 12/24/2011 01:40 PM, David Thomas wrote:
After struggling with a Compulab CM3530 board to no avail I purchased
a Beagleboard-xM. Out of the box the demo image included came right
up. I managed to get uvcvideo
Signed-off-by: Philip Balister phi...@balister.org
---
.../include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc
b/conf/distro/include/angstrom-2010-preferred-versions.inc
Thanks, applied.
Philip
On 10/15/2011 10:23 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@gmx.de
---
recipes/images/console-gnuradio-image.bb |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/images/console-gnuradio-image.bb
On 10/08/2011 11:13 PM, Cliff Brake wrote:
What are the tradeoffs between using openssh and dropbear? I'm using
Angstrom/systemd images, and would prefer dropbear as its likely
smaller, but want to make sure I understand the other tradeoffs.
In my case, the customer asked for openssh over
On 07/26/2011 12:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Paul Menzel wrote:
I am still having some concerns I raised in reply to Khem?s message [2]
but I am pasting them here again.
Will reply to your original message on OE-dev.
If someone can point me at a coherent set of instructions for building
On 07/27/2011 01:31 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 27 jul. 2011, om 19:24 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven:
On 07/26/2011 12:35 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Paul Menzel wrote:
I am still having some concerns I raised in reply to Khem?s message [2]
but I am pasting them here again
On 07/15/2011 12:21 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
What do you think of making the oe-core branch[1] the default in the setup
scripts? The basic needs are there and I'm using it for for all the new work
I'm doing. It is missing a lot of recipes, but if people can name the ones that
are missing we
On 04/13/2011 12:09 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Hmm, permisions on disk look ok, Ill have to bug koen when he is back from
travelling to look at the apache setup.
I'll kick him in person.
Philip
Graeme
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:50:39AM +0400, Maxim Podbereznyy wrote:
Hi!
I tried to build
On 04/06/2011 06:48 AM, Michael Burghart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am 06.04.2011 12:57, schrieb Michael Burghart:
Hi,
is it possible to directly create a bootable Angstrom image for x86
(using grub)? Similar to an Voyage Linux img file?
If so please tell me
On 04/05/2011 09:33 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION = 1.11.0
METADATA_BRANCH = org.openembedded.dev
METADATA_REVISION = 5568192
TARGET_ARCH = arm
TARGET_OS = linux-gnueabi
MACHINE = beagleboard
DISTRO = angstrom
DISTRO_VERSION = v20110405
TARGET_FPU = hard
| install:
On 03/18/2011 11:29 AM, Connor Abbott wrote:
Hi,
It seems I'm having a problem building python-numpy. I'm using the setup
script and building for the beagleboard, and I've tried DISTRO=2008.1 and
DISTRO=2010.x. I can build task-gpe-base, but anything that pulls in Python,
such as
On 03/18/2011 09:12 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
Thanks! I use blas-dev and lapack-dev for other projects. Is it possible to
get Angstrom lapack/blas and these packages to coexist?
Probably, but I couldn't solve the problem and need to get other stuff
done :)
Philip
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at
On 03/03/2011 06:05 AM, Steffen Sledz wrote:
Hi Ångström maintainers,
it would be nice, if you can have a look
athttp://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/42628/focus=43125
and make a statement on the strategic goals for the Ångström distro.
This would be really helpful for
The online image builder is moving to another machine atm. It will be
offline for 3-4 hours.
Go celebrate the holiday season of your choice!
Philip
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org
I'm looking for a way to point people at a relatively sane checkout of
the OE dev for people using a product based on Angstrom 2010.
What I would to see is a branch called something like
angstrom-2010-feeds that follows dev, but is only used to build feeds
and available for people to pull
On 12/07/2010 11:12 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-12-10 16:39, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 12/07/2010 08:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-12-10 15:37, Philip Balister wrote:
I'm looking for a way to point people
On 10/18/2010 05:31 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We broke the 1TB per month barrier and now the ISP is throttling us to
10Mbit/s. The admins are working on solving this, but it might be a case
of wait for the month to end.
Stay tuned...
Thanks for
On 09/20/2010 05:00 PM, Almohanad Fayez wrote:
Hi, I'm running the Angstrom on the Beagleboard and I'm trying to find a way to modify the audio rate
register values to force sampling rates other than 44.1 kHz and 48 kHz. Basically when I run
cat /sys/devices/platform/soc-audio/codec_reg
ffOn 07/16/2010 02:54 PM, alfa...@aol.com wrote:
Hi, I'm running into some issues linking against libraries. I'm running a
console-image Angstrom on the Beagleboad and I've been adding packages as
necessary to support compiling code directly on the board.
To support building packages on the
On 07/16/2010 03:59 PM, alfa...@aol.com wrote:
I already installed the dev packages fftw3 fftw3-dev libfftw
Are the header files in the include directory?
Philip
al
-Original Message-
From: Philip Balisterphi...@balister.org
To: Discussion of the angstrom distribution
Oh crap.
All the easy answers are exhausted
Drop me a personal email and lets figure this out.
Philip
On 07/16/2010 07:04 PM, alfa...@aol.com wrote:
yep they're all there
al
-Original Message-
From: Philip Balisterphi...@balister.org
To: Discussion of the angstrom
On 06/01/2010 10:47 AM, Merciadri Luca wrote:
Gary Thomas wrote:
On 06/01/2010 08:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Gary Thomas wrote:
I tried again today, updating to org.openembedded.dev branch,
commit a2834c64fb3ed535fca51c25547754fa907e4ca5 Sadly, new
problems (and
On 12/15/2009 11:01 PM, alfa...@aol.com wrote:
Hi, I was wondering about the extent of USB support for the Davinci DM6446
board. I'm currently trying to mount a USB stick formatted to FAT 16 but the
board would not recognize it. I even changed the jumper for it to work in host
mode. I'm
On 11/30/2009 08:31 AM, Séverin MARCOMBES wrote:
Hello,
I'm a really new user of openembedded and angstrom.
I need a JFFS2 image of an Angstrom filesystem compiled for the Atmel
AT91SAM9263-EK board.
I would like an image as little as possible, with support of SSH, Blue-Z and
QT, so that
It looks like the Angstrom website is back. Sorry for the outage, we had
a server move with short notice, and I have been on vacation. Let us
know if there is anything else not working.
Thanks,
Philip
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Dear webmasters!
Thanks for reactivating the website!
You asked for information, if something is missing. Yes, there is something
missing. It is the link to the wiki (better say: the wiki-site), which is
still not accessible.
Thanks, I am checking on it now.
Philip
Koen Kooi wrote:
On 22-06-09 18:18, Maxim Podbereznyi wrote:
Dear Koen,
I always ask myself a question why we have the online builder for
rootfs but
never have a toolchain available online. Is it really necessary for
all to
pass all that way to compile all the OE distribution to get a
chown /OE to be owned by you.
Any particular reason the instructions do not have you install in in the
users home directory?
Philip
Lundqvist Anders wrote:
Reinstalled the entire Ubuntu from scratch!
As a user:
alund...@alundqvi-ubuntu:/OE/openembedded$ bitbake meta-toolchain
Traceback
Maxim Podbereznyi wrote:
Dear Koen,
CCACHE did not help.
I think I've found the problem. I'm using Fedora Core 7 as a main build host
and gcc version is 4.1.2 there. So I decided to try to build Angstrom in
Ubuntu 8.10 where gcc-4.3.2 was installed. I don't know if it succeeds till
the end,
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Ben Gamari wrote:
Furthermore, I just attempted to remove the dependency on avahi
altogether by adding the following to task-base.bb,
BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS = avahi-daemon avahi-autoipd
Despite this, it pulled in both packages. This I am truly baffled by. Ideas?
I am
Capn_Fish Zaurus wrote:
Can somebody at least let me know what OS works for building
functional images? Ubuntu 8.04 isn't working for me, nor is Gentoo
~x86. Is either Fedora 10 or Ubuntu 8.10 known to work?
Do you have specific issues? OE works for me on all Fedora up to 9.
Philip
Thanks
Koen Kooi wrote:
Bob Igo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
Ah, that error is one of that random libtool ones we fixed in .dev:
'bitbake -c clean libtool-cross ; bitbake -c clean fontconfig'
Thanks for helping me work around that. How does this fix get
Philip,
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Philip Balister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to change the variable used for the user to add packages to a
standard image from ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL to IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL. This is
an image property, and not Angstrom specific.
Is there anything wrong
SDG Systems wrote:
The 2007.12 naming made sense to me. 2007.12 was the time period when
you branched from .dev, essentially. So the next time you branch from
.dev to stabilize will it be org.openembedded.new-stable? I would
think that at some point you will do a stable branch from .dev again
Funny date from a couple of emails?
Philip
Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Sokolovsky schreef:
| Hello,
|
|
|
| Up.
*Rubberstamp OK*
|
|
| On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:35:58 +0200
| Paul Sokolovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
| Begin forwarded message:
|
|
Koen Kooi wrote:
If we drop the bookkeeping part, getting things into the stable tree
will be much easier:
* send explanation and diff to angstrom-distro-devel
* 2 developers sign off on it
* apply diff
* copy-paste explanation into NEWS or Changelog
This makes a faster turnaround possible,
Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As the subject says:
Google summer of code: 1 day left, who will submit the angstrom project?
I was going to, but I missed the deadline. I read the deadline as May
12, which I took to be midnight GMT or California time.
I am going to work on this today/tomorrow. Dis we get a wiki page
together for ideas?
Philip
Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As the subject says:
Google summer of code: 1 day left, who will submit the angstrom project?
regards,
Koen
-BEGIN PGP
I'm not having any luck finding the page. Can you be more specific?
Philip
Jacob Thebault-Spieker wrote:
Wiki page is up, check the main page of the Angstrom wiki. It's just a
concatenated version of what I saw on the mailing list.
--
Jacob Thebault-Spieker
Cell: (207) 717-5114
Philip
for content let me know :) I'll probably
pitch this as a joint OE/Angstrom effort since the ideas serve both
communities.
Philip
Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Balister schreef:
| I am going to work on this today/tomorrow.
Great! Many thanks to all the people
I've poked around the SoC web pages and there are projects that only
list one or two ideas. Also some organizations list partner
organizations, so we could list the mentoring organization as
OpenEmbedded and Angstrom
I'd be glad to list myself as the contact. This will make dealing with
Look at the boost bb file. You may need to depend on something like
boost-dev.
Philip
Capn_Fish Zaurus wrote:
I'm trying to make a BB file for the latest Wesnoth, which needs Boost. I
added Boost to the deps list in the BB file, and it (Boost) built OK, but
Wesnoth doesn't find the headers,
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
I'm willing to mentor one project, but I'm not available as general organizer.
I'd be willing to do the general organization (submit the app etc). I'm
not sure who to apply as, but we have plenty of projects we could apply
this to. (OE, Angstrom). What we
I finally had a chance to look the Angstrom-2007 images for the OSK.
I've made console-image and the kernel available to the general public.
Philip
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
Koen Kooi wrote:
| and invite people to upload more builds.
No, if it hasn't been built by a autobuilder, it shouldn't be available
for download (that includes images!).
We should encourage people to request the addition of new images and
packages to the autobuilder? How does the autobuilder
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello,
Please approve this critical fix. And I would like to RFC
coreteam members to be able to commit without pre-review for critical
bug and security fixes.
We should at least give people 24 hours to object to something before it
goes into the stable branch.
Console image runs fine on the OSK (omap5912osk), but base image is
hanging during boot. I have created bug
http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3571 for this.
Any ideas on the hang? Same kernel for both images. kernel and images
came from the autobuilder.
Philip
smime.p7s
Koen Kooi wrote:
Which brings me to the RFC:
* replace minimal-image with base-image in autobuilder for all machines
Why not build both? One for people who want a very basic image to start
from and the other for people who want to start with package management?
Mind you, I'm having a
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello Philip,
Monday, December 17, 2007, 4:22:23 PM, you wrote:
Koen Kooi wrote:
Which brings me to the RFC:
* replace minimal-image with base-image in autobuilder for all machines
Why not build both? One for people who want a very basic image to start
from and
74 matches
Mail list logo
