At 09:27 21-12-02 -0700, you wrote:
2nd Whoa
(this is different from the 2nd Biblical Woe...g...)
Okay...all hotshot Listers...g
Here is where we need to stop and assess and do some
documentation.
1. That printer output inconsistency is now fixed..??
Klas and Bastiaan you both agree that Glenn
Over the weekend, we heard from Gregy:
2. Do we have a pretty good idea of where the
problem lies with that click-on \\ or ALT-F2
crash is being caused...?? From the posts, it
seems to be in the w9x DOS after a certain
version. Is this correct..?? If it is correct,
then Bastiaan, or someone
Gregy wrote:
Here is where we need to stop and assess and do some
documentation.
1. That printer output inconsistency is now fixed..??
Klas and Bastiaan you both agree that Glenn has made
that Look and Feel consistent..?? If so, then,
will Klas and Bastiaan please write a brief text
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 13:44:02 -0500 (EST), Klaus Hameyer wrote:
Gregy wrote:
Here is where we need to stop and assess and do some
documentation.
1. That printer output inconsistency is now fixed..??
Klas and Bastiaan you both agree that Glenn has made
that Look and Feel consistent..?? If
Here's where I disagree, Alex.
There is limited value trying to go against the flow. English is the
major force in a lot of topical areas, including computing. If it wasn't
for English, none of us might have ever experienced Arachne. Or, at
least, been able to understand Michael's HELP files.
I agree with most Alex's perspective. I'm still convinced that the REAL
PROBLEM is the lack of OPTIONS inherent in a particular program. With
options, programs grow. Without options, they die.
Which is why, after reviewing everybody's suggestions and suggested
alternative programs, I still desire
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:01:23 -0700, you wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Laurie L Proud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip--
Glenn I woulden't bother. Arachne isn't rearly meant to be run on
a windows system, and your time could be better spent. Please don't
get up to your elbows
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:41:49, you wrote:
On 14 Dec 02 at 5:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn I woulden't bother. Arachne isn't rearly meant to be run on
a windows system, and your time could be better spent. Please don't
get up to your elbows in assembler on our account.
Just my view
Hi All,
A merry christmas and a happy new year to you all ! I hope you have
snow, we have torrential rain forcast in England.
The HP Deskjet printer is now printing under windoze, so the LPT1
port is now active, it was dead before (in DOS).
Season's greetings
Laurie
-- Arachne V1.71;UE01,
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 00:43:40 +00, Bastiaan wrote:
Points a,b, and c are correct on my machine (W98),
but point d is not! Point d is correct on my machine = Win95 ...
Oh boy do we have another bug in Win98?
Yes I think so, Checking your mails with Rays, and then with my
machine seems to
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 05:44:13 +, Laurie L Proud wrote:
snip
It seems one fella has the business end, and the guy has to sleep
earn a crust and have a life. I will refrain from the funnies!
Oh go on I carn't resist, is having a life optional for Arachne's
software developer ?
Nope.
What SPAM is THIS ? Did anybody else here get one? Did anybody
else get one requesting a reliable supplier of a similar product?
I wonder in which dimension my most beloved enemies were travelling
when they signed me up for this kind of spam.
Sam Heywood
I received this same spam,
I've been racking my brain trying to remember the name
of a graphical DOS HTML viewer that I used just before
discovering Arachne, lo these many(?) years ago.
Knots.
If you find whatever the last version of that was, you
have a graphical HTML viewer with no communication
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 04:51:27 +, Laurie L Proud wrote:
snip
I think it's pretty much nailed down as to what the problem is after
cross checking everyones emails.
It's the DOS contained in W95 that does not recognise the @ I think.
As mentioned before if you get to a DOS prompt after
Okay, then Listers,
Do we agree that 1.71ue01 is at a point where the known and
immediate Arachne bugs are identified and corrected??
At least as far as general useage and newbie user are
concerned...??
If we do agree, then we should freeze 1.71ue01 for general
distribution. Continuing work
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 13:33:49 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VuHTML, Browse, Public Domain
I agree with most Alex's perspective. I'm still convinced that the REAL
PROBLEM is the lack of OPTIONS inherent in a particular program. With
options, programs grow.
Laurie,
The basics of HTML are so easy to learn - give it a try.
Save a web page to your hard drive, then look at the source code
(file*.htm or file*.html) and compare that to what you see with the
browser. Check out a particular piece of text on the web page, then
search for that in the
Thanks, Mister Wizard.
See my questions after your paragraphs (below).
Bob
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 23:46:06 CST Glenn Gilbreath Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 13:33:49 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VuHTML, Browse, Public Domain
snip
arachne-digest Monday, December 23 2002 Volume 01 : Number 1992
--
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:16:59 -0500
From: Glenn McCorkle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xSwap error in asf
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 10:00:33,
19 matches
Mail list logo
