On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Chris Young wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:03:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
I doubt I'll be looking at ArcEm much more in the near future, so I'll
leave it to you to decide what (if anything) to do with these changes. I
haven't tried them on anything
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Chris Young wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:49 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
I didn't make any effort to ensure
the new memory code ran on big-endian machines, so it wouldn't surprise me
if it's failing. Take a look at the LoadByte, StoreByte and SwapByte
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Chris Gransden wrote:
Is there any way of getting an indication of the speed against a real
machine. I've tried !Sick. That gives processor 20 MHz and Memory 14 MHz.
Is that likely to accurate.
I don't think any of the frontends
Hi,
I've completely broken the other frontends, but here's the results of
another week of working on ArcEm:
* Source: http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem-src.zip
* RISC OS build: http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem.zip
Changes (or at least as much as I can remember):
* Made
Hi Ralph,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
Nice to see some activity on arcem. Out of interest, do you just work
on the source as one long activity or use an SCM, like Subversion or
Bazaar, locally to break up the edits?
Cheers, Ralph.
Since ArcEm is quite small
Right, third version uploaded, same place as before:
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem-src.zip (Source)
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem.zip (RISC OS build)
Compared to the previous version, this one features:
* New display driver for palettised output (arch/paldisplaydev.c).
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Chris Young wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:23:38 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
* Amiga GP2X display code has been modified to use the palettised
driver. So with any luck both those platforms will work with only minimal
fixes. However I haven't tried to add
Another new version uploaded, same place as usual. A fair number of
changes went into this version so I haven't attached a patch, but let me
know if you'd like one.
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem-src.zip (source)
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem.zip (RISC OS build)
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Michael Drake wrote:
In article Pine.WNT.4.62.1110090200090.2404@c203,
Jeffrey Lee m...@phlamethrower.co.uk wrote:
Another new version uploaded
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem-src.zip (source)
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem.zip (RISC OS build
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Chris Young wrote:
On 17 Oct 2011 23:58:51 +, Chris Young wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:06:27 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
Right, another new version:
A couple of changes to get it to compile attached (there may be a
better place than hostfs.h
On Wed, 18 Oct 2011, Chris Young wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:53:22 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
Rather than keep breaking the Amiga version, I think I'll have a go at
installing a version of QEMU that I can use to test the big-endian version
of ArcEm. A quick google throws
On Thu, 19 Oct 2011, Chris Young wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:52:14 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
The problem was a bug in the endian swapping code, but it would only
affect the last few bytes of the transfer. Any transfer which ended on a
word boundary would have been OK
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Chris Young wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:53:22 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
It wouldn't
surprise me if things are horribly broken on systems where 'int' is only
16 bits.
Erm, int is 16-bit here... maybe this is the issue?
I'll save my !Boot for now
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi,
Under 64-bit Linux I'm getting a window that doesn't handle expose
events and New mode: 0x0, 400Hz (CR 0 ClockIn 24Mhz) rapidly
scrolling up the screen. Anyone else see that? This is with arcem-fast
straight from CVS followed by a `make'.
(Whoops, make sure I get the right email address for arcem-devel this
time. Apologies to Andew who'll get this twice!)
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Andrew Flegg wrote:
Apologies for the off-topicyness, but I've built the arcem-fast branch
with 'make SOUND_SUPPORT=yes' and run it under
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Chris Young wrote:
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 17:47:16 +, Jeffrey Lee wibbled on for an age:
Update of /cvsroot/arcem/arcem
In directory vz-cvs-4.sog:/tmp/cvs-serv11622
Modified Files:
Tag: arcem-fast
arminit.c hostfs.c
Log Message:
HostFS fixes
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
FYI, there's still a bug lurking somewhere in the hostfs code. I thought
I'd fixed it with my changes earlier, but for some reason if Wolf 3D is
running from HostFS then it will often fail to close the savegame file
after loading it, preventing the game
Hi guys,
As you've seen there are quite a few bits which need fixing up in order to
get the OS X port to work again. I would have done most of it myself, but
then Ian said he was planning on redoing the OS X port from scratch, so I
decided to leave the tidying up to him (especially since I
Michael being the website maintainer sounds good to me. At one point I was
planning on updating it a bit myself with a new RISC OS build, but I guess
I never put in the effort to track down someone who could explain it all
or give me the right permissions.
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
On index.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/
I think it's just the Features section which is out of date.
It has Features of version 1.00, and Additional features of the CVS
version. I'm not sure if the CVS section has been kept updated or if
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
On manual.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/manual.html [...]
This page has a change log up to version 1.00, which will need updated
for 1.50.
Indeed - I'll try knocking up a changelog summarising
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Chris Young wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:13:08 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
On manual.html -- http://arcem.sourceforge.net/manual.html [...]
This page has a change
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
Hi,
Is there something I've missed which'd allow video scaling (say 2x)
for modes 640x480.
It looks like the other ports have something like it, so are there any
pointers for where to start hacking on it? Presumably, the scaling
factor
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 29 July 2012 20:09, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
What happens to 'HD' after its been initialised? What actually does
the pixel blatting and how could this be getting confused with a 2
XScale, but not a 2 YScale?
Ah, it seems that
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 29 July 2012 20:18, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
Ah, it seems that SDD_Name(RowFunc) dispatches to an explicit set of
functions which only support 1X and 2X. Hmm.
These 16 functions (1bpp, 2bpp, 4bpp, 8bpp @ 1x. 2x with flags and
without
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 29 July 2012 20:41, Jeffrey Lee m...@phlamethrower.co.uk wrote:
Abstractable, yes. Abstractable without impacting performance? Doubtful.
Remember that I fought long and hard to get ArcEm to run at ARM2 speeds on
an Iyonix, so I don't really want us
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote:
On 29 July 2012 20:50, Ian Jeffray i...@jeffray.co.uk wrote:
So long as we don't lose performance... lots of separately optimised
functions are good for performance. And they're not /quite/ as
similar as you may think at first glance.
I admit I
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
I've also started to get the Win32 build to actually build again,
using VS2010 (mostly just a little breakage in the fastmap stuff
to solve in a clean way).
FWIW, the Win32 build (now that you've fixed all the C99-ness) builds OK
with the Express
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Ian Jeffray wrote:
Might be interesting to check if there's any noticeable (timeable)
performance difference between the gcc and vs2010 builds... I'd rather
hope the latter would be ahead.
I'm not entirely sure if !SICK can be trusted (the CPU speed it reports
seems to
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
Log Message:
* win/dirent.h - Free dirent.h implementation for Win32 from
http://www.softagalleria.net/dirent.php, required for building HostFS
in VS
--- NEW FILE: dirent.h ---
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Michael Drake wrote:
In article Pine.WNT.4.62.1208010132340.4424@c203,
Jeffrey Lee m...@phlamethrower.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
How about having the `User Manual' in the left-hand column at
http://arcem.sourceforge.net/ link to a page
Christmas is fast approaching, which means the ?? ?? 2012 release date I
put in the changelog is looking more and more foolish:
http://arcem.sf.net/changelog.html
Any objections to pushing out a finished 1.50 release sometime in the
next couple of weeks? Although there are more tweaks and
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Sourceforge are mailing project admins pointing out CVS write access is
going to stop. Read access will continue, but that might be stopped too
in time. (Maintaining CVS's source is too much of a burden for them.)
Given our project-admin hats,
Hi Ralph,
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Given our project-admin hats, Peter Naulls or I can convert the CVS to
Subversion or Git following SF's instructions.
https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/CVS/
Any updates on this? It looks like we might be missing out on some
new
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Steffen Huber wrote:
Ian Jeffray wrote:
I'd vote for git, especially if that's coming to RISC OS (26bit?)
I expect Jeffrey is currently (after successfully initiating the
port of SimpleGit) working on a Git client for all Acorn machines
starting with the A305 running
arcem-fast branch - in my conversion, it’s
represented by a
series of “Merge arcem-fast to trunk” commits, which isn’t too helpful when
looking through the
history.
If there are no objections to this I’ll go ahead with the conversion at the
weekend.
Regards
Cameron
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 23:09, J
Hi,
GitHub sounds good to me as well. I've got no objections to you doing the
conversion yourself. But I also think that a few years ago someone else
mentioned that they'd done a converison - probably Chris Young:
https://github.com/chris-y/arcem
At a brief look Chris's conversion is
37 matches
Mail list logo
