[Assp-test] MalDoc in PDF

2023-08-29 Thread K Post
Info released today on a new technique called MalDoc in PDF https://blogs.jpcert.or.jp/en/2023/08/maldocinpdf.html Will ASSP_AFC be able to block these if we already reject VBS / OLE / VBA in Office docs? Will it know it's an office doc, or will it think PDF?

Re: [Assp-test] Unable to create UDP Socket errors

2022-12-28 Thread K Post
I never saw this prior to 22326, but have seen it twice on 22326 running on Windows. ASSP will run for days/weeks without issue, but once the UDP socket errors start, I need to restart or else they'll continue every 5 minutes or so. I get 2 of the same error messages in a row, every 5 min or so,

[Assp-test] Comments in ASSP_AFCKnownGoodEXE file

2022-12-17 Thread K Post
Minor issue/bug with ASSP_AFCKnownGoodEXE config file comments. I've got 2 sha256 entries in my ASSP_AFCKnownGoodEXE. The file looks like # PDF from accounting Dec 2022 7B366390CD4E3DB19E06009FCE54DF272BEE0D3B34003F3A786C4835239BFDFF # PDF from IRS Dec 2022

Re: [Assp-test] Allowing certain javascript in HTML to pass

2022-10-31 Thread K Post
quick question - before I dig deeper, did the previous AFC plugin not block javascript in HTML at all? On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:21 AM K Post wrote: > The new AFC is blocking a nightly report that comes in HTML format with > javascript in it -- as I would expect, but before his n

[Assp-test] Allowing certain javascript in HTML to pass

2022-10-31 Thread K Post
The new AFC is blocking a nightly report that comes in HTML format with javascript in it -- as I would expect, but before his new AFC, they were erroneously slipping through. I don't know why these reports weren't being blocked before, it's basic HTML with a short block of javascript at the end.

Re: [Assp-test] Line Continuation in config files

2022-09-09 Thread K Post
on was not working for > the analyzer - the matching line in a file was not found (and not shown) > > This will be fixed. > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> >

[Assp-test] Line Continuation in config files

2022-09-08 Thread K Post
Back in November 2011, I saw: fixed in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21317: - files used in configuration parameters are now supporting line continuation by adding a backslash '\' at the end of a line I'm just trying this now, but it doesn't seem to be working. *When you say "files used in

Re: [Assp-test] soft hyphen fooling Bayesian analysis

2022-09-07 Thread K Post
engines will have learned also > obscured words (word combinations). > > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:06.09.2022 21:31 > Betreff:

Re: [Assp-test] soft hyphen fooling Bayesian analysis

2022-09-06 Thread K Post
to find > for example : <<<\P{Cyrillic}\p{Cyrillic}+\P{Cyrillic}>>> > finds a sequence where cyrillic (a p b ) are used in words - commonly > used by spammers > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post&qu

[Assp-test] soft hyphen fooling Bayesian analysis

2022-09-06 Thread K Post
Is there a way to improve the way that ASSP parses certain special, non-printing, characters? I'm having trouble with spam emails that have their body heavily obfuscated with "soft hyphens" slipping through. They all seem to have multipart bodies, first with an iso-8559-1 text part with *=AD*

[Assp-test] Warnings for unable to resolve IP

2022-08-09 Thread K Post
Has anything changed with recent dev versions of ASSP in terms of warnings in the logs for being unable to lookup an IP? For example: warning: can't resolve the IP-address for the destination stonewallkitchenvip.com using the configured DNS-servers Nothing's wrong with assp,

Re: [Assp-test] blockStrictDKIMRe -- also thoughts on DMARC rejects

2022-07-16 Thread K Post
s parsed and processed by the > analyzer > > from ASSP_AFC.pm: > > AFC_Executable_Detection - custome code to detect executable code in > attachments, called if no code was found > > > The following config parameters can point to subs in CorrectASSPcfg.pm: > > ASSP_ARCSelectC

Re: [Assp-test] blockStrictDKIMRe -- also thoughts on DMARC rejects

2022-07-14 Thread K Post
etuned using :>NWLI > > You are also able to implement code in to the regex (for example to check > for the DKIM result). This is much less complicated than writing a plugin. > \@.+\.docusign\.net(?{::myWantedDKIMCheck($fh)})=>60 > "score with 60 if the sender matches a

Re: [Assp-test] blockStrictDKIMRe -- also thoughts on DMARC rejects

2022-07-07 Thread K Post
..), some these options also exists > for DKIM. > If we ignore/change/override sender policies for SPF and DKIM, it is > not wise to honor the reject DMARC policy strictly. > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASS

[Assp-test] blockStrictDKIMRe -- also thoughts on DMARC rejects

2022-06-16 Thread K Post
The ability to block failed SPF, instead of just scoring them, for delect regex matches has been a terrific feature of ASSP for a long time. (Block SPF Processing Regex* (blockstrictSPFRe) ) *Would you please consider adding a feature to do the same for a failed DKIM signature?* Outright

Re: [Assp-test] blocking new MS doc vunerability (URI attack vector)

2022-06-14 Thread K Post
us download and playload. > > > Solutions for CVE-2022-30190 are provided by Microsoft: > > > https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2022/05/30/guidance-for-cve-2022-30190-microsoft-support-diagnostic-tool-vulnerability/ > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post"

Re: [Assp-test] bombHeaderRe matching every email

2022-06-07 Thread K Post
Hi Scott, Did you ever figure this out? I'm no regex wiz like Thomas is, but what you have appears pretty simple to me -- and I don't see anything wrong with it... I tried from\:.*\_ in testRE and see it matching everything too. I don't understand why. I know this doesn't help you with why

[Assp-test] blocking new MS doc vunerability (URI attack vector)

2022-05-31 Thread K Post
Hello Thomas, Any way for ASSP to block this kind of thing? https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/New+Microsoft+Office+Attack+Vector+via+msmsdt+Protocol+Scheme+CVE202230190/28694 Hopefully clamav will eventually catch it, but be nice great to be able strip documents off using AFC if they contain

Re: [Assp-test] assp development switched to perl 5.34.0

2022-03-08 Thread K Post
Nicely done! How'd you get this done it's released at strawberryperl.com? On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 10:18 AM Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Hi all, > > the assp development is switched to perl 5.34.0 > > strawberry perl 5.34.0 (for win_x64) is available at the sourceforge assp > download repository > >

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 22019

2022-01-24 Thread K Post
Thank you Thomas. You know that I love the SPF addition option for IP address lists!! Happy to no longer need to use the script I wrote to accomplish this. I'm glad (and proud) that you've recognized this as a good idea. I have some questions about the new SPF functionality as well as the

Re: [Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-11-14 Thread K Post
to skip reading your endless > posts and blogs. It takes simply too much time to pick up the 1 to 5% of > helpful content and to be forced by you to answer also the rest. > > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP developm

Re: [Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-11-13 Thread K Post
56 AM Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Ken , it would be nice if you consider to signoff this list or at least to > no longer post here. > > Thank you. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list"

Re: [Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-11-12 Thread K Post
g time is 6 minutes. > > populating the records to the mysql database takes some minutes longer > > > So - maxBytes:=100.000 seems to be a possible setting (but this will IMHO > not improve detection rates) > > If you need to process complete mails for bombs - you'll need t

Re: [Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-11-12 Thread K Post
YOU EVER thougth about that ??? Or do you only write > something to fillup the community mailing list? > > No - no way! > > Thomas > > > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-

Re: [Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-11-10 Thread K Post
. On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:43 PM K Post wrote: > When looking at the "Use this HTML Parser" section on the GUI, I found > this line: > > it is recommended to set MaxBytes to 5 (be carefull on heavy load > systems - spam bomb regular expressions will take longer usin

Re: [Assp-test] Another Concept Question: DKIMBousScoreList

2021-11-09 Thread K Post
alid DKIM signatures should be blocked or scored very high, so the > bonus score does not matter > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:

Re: [Assp-test] Another Concept Question: DKIMBousScoreList

2021-11-08 Thread K Post
ah, wait, are you saying that BombRe will look at headers that ASSP ads, like X-ASSP-DKIM-Identity (which would only be added for a valid signature)? (!) I always assumed that the bomb functionality was only on the mail's original headers. On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 2:28 PM K Post wrote

Re: [Assp-test] Another Concept Question: DKIMBousScoreList

2021-11-08 Thread K Post
ore > - e.g. -10 > (?(DEFINE)(?the_wanted_identity|ident5|ident6|..))\nDKIM-Signature:(?:[ > \t]*[^= \;]+=[^= \;]+\;(?:\r\n)?)+?[ > \t]*([di]=\@?(?))\;=>the_wanted_negative_score > - eg -20 > ... > > CLOSED for me > > > Thomas > > > > Von:

Re: [Assp-test] RegEx Backreferences - the basics

2021-11-05 Thread K Post
k). So, yes - looking around the string without moving > the position around makes some things more easy. > > > This thread should be stopped here. This is a test list for development > versions - it is not a blog and it is not a place to learn perl regular > expressions. > > Thomas

Re: [Assp-test] Another Concept Question: DKIMBousScoreList

2021-11-05 Thread K Post
about concepts without reading the manual. > > >dkimBonusValancePB > > there is already dkimOkValencePB - increase it > > and > > reduce the score for certain domains by blackListedDomains, SenderBase or > anywhere else - if needed > > Thomas > > > >

Re: [Assp-test] RegEx Backreferences - the basics

2021-11-04 Thread K Post
g).*@.*\1.* > > assp makes it: > > (?is:(?:^|\n\r).*(searchstring).*@.*\1.*) > > think about your regex - read it from left to right as 'perl regex engine' > - what will happen? > beside the other mistakes the @ should be escaped \@ , because an ARRAY > @. may exist > >

[Assp-test] Another Concept Question: DKIMBousScoreList

2021-11-04 Thread K Post
SUMMARY: Would there be benefit (that wouldn't be terrible to code) in adding the ability for use to assign a score to emails that match a list of DKIM signature identities? The DKIMWLAddress and DKIMNPAddress functionality has been an absolute game changer here. Thank you so much for

[Assp-test] RegEx Backreferences - the basics

2021-11-03 Thread K Post
I've got nothing in my TestRe file except for a single line: ~<<<(?:^|\n\r).*(searchstring).*@.*\1.*>>>~ The idea is to log any time there's a line that includes "searchstring" on the right and left of an @. This is just a very rudimentary test because backreferences seem to error for me. I

[Assp-test] Manual clarification suggestions for RedList

2021-11-03 Thread K Post
Under the spam control section, I suggest: 1) Moving the "Redlist serves 2 purposes..." bit from the GUI up to its own explanation section instead of having it in the RedRE section. That useful description applies to more than just RedRE 2) Adding some information to the redlist description.

Re: [Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-11-01 Thread K Post
n Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:40 PM K Post wrote: > Summary: > *Should/could any consideration be given to having ASSP scan the entire > message at the time it is received for Bombs (only), while still using > MaxBytes for Bayesian/HMM?* > > We've been having some cleverly crafted m

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21302

2021-11-01 Thread K Post
Outlook itself is a typo. I think it's supposed to be called LookOut! -Using the outlook function "send email as attachment" or "forward email as attachment" has NEVER worked - because outlook destroys the original MIME header. But the original header is particularly important for analysis

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21302

2021-10-30 Thread K Post
email received > by assp to start with an empty line followed by (html code) or that > the first header line of such a mail is the subject header line ? > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list"

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21302

2021-10-30 Thread K Post
eader line ? > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:30.10.2021 09:15 > Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Eva

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21302

2021-10-30 Thread K Post
sorry, I sent the last message before proofing or finishing. Grr, gmail. I'll wait to hear from you. I have more thoughts on NWLI and other sections. On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:00 PM K Post wrote: > This is simply terrific. You keep making ASAP better! The rebuild config > effi

[Assp-test] Concept Question: Scan entire message for Bombs, regardless of MaxBytes setting? New MaxBytes recommendation?

2021-10-29 Thread K Post
Summary: *Should/could any consideration be given to having ASSP scan the entire message at the time it is received for Bombs (only), while still using MaxBytes for Bayesian/HMM?* We've been having some cleverly crafted messages slipping through all filters that would be easy to catch with Bombs

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21302

2021-10-29 Thread K Post
This is simply terrific. You keep making ASAP better! The rebuild config efficiency improvements are especially appreciated. Thanks so much as usual for spending what must have been a long time thinking about and making all of these changes. SURPRISE, I have questions and comments: *Fix to

Re: [Assp-test] Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again

2021-10-28 Thread K Post
is the regex rebuild seemingly using all workers and not just the maintenance worker, leaving the other workers available? thanks On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:40 PM K Post wrote: > > Apart from the fact that the MaintThread (1) does not store the > file time correctly for 'Groups' inclu

Re: [Assp-test] Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again

2021-10-27 Thread K Post
ns (IP) are build > by each thread. > > >For years, I've run an external script to query various providers' SPF > records and get the IP addresses for them into a file. > > For what reason? > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:&quo

[Assp-test] Analyze email report from spam report not fully processing headers from Outlook attached .eml

2021-10-27 Thread K Post
*SUMMARY*: Emailed analyze reports when in response to a forward as attachment error report .eml from Outlook, doesn't seem to find the subject, from, and potentially more. The .eml is extracted and saved properly in the error-spam/error-notspam folder though, with the subject/from/etc. For

Re: [Assp-test] Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again

2021-10-27 Thread K Post
file " button. It looks normal, not hex encoded. Note: the bottom of the editor window says: "First line specifies text that appears in the subject of report message. The remaining lines are the report message body." I'm guessing that's just an oversight. On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11

Re: [Assp-test] Concept question: At rebuild, look at DKIMWLAddresses?

2021-10-26 Thread K Post
ddresses, DKIMNPAddresses, > redRe - for assp/spam > - checking denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways, denySMTPConnectionsFrom, > blackListedDomains for assp/notspam > > The slowest case is 12 times slower than the fastest. > > Thomas > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Assp-test] Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again

2021-10-26 Thread K Post
n) it is expected, that the config reload takes 30 > seconds or longer - 'ConnectionTransferTimeOut' should be changed - or the > "Warning: > Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again!" > should be ignored. > > If the reload takes X seco

[Assp-test] NotifyRE matches whole log line, including timestamp

2021-10-25 Thread K Post
Question summary: *In the mLog function where ASSP does the NotifyRe comparison, does it make sense to consider having ASSP look at $comment instead of the full $m variable which starts with the timestamp?* For a long time, I've had the GUI example of warning: in my NotifyRe configuration.

Re: [Assp-test] Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again

2021-10-25 Thread K Post
t...@ourcharity.org Oct-25-21 11:30:04 Warning: Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again! On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 8:53 PM K Post wrote: > I'm desperate for help. It seems that ASSP has thread problems frequently > when it reloads the config. I se

Re: [Assp-test] Concept question: At rebuild, look at DKIMWLAddresses?

2021-10-24 Thread K Post
rdt wrote: > >During rebuild, ASSP runs rb_whitelisted against each message in the > spam corpus > > only for spam (not for corrected spam) AND only if enabled (DoRBWhite , > DoRBRed) ! > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:&q

[Assp-test] Concept question with sample code: DKIMWLAddresses single line for .domain.com and @domain.com?

2021-10-23 Thread K Post
(I believe I have this working, see code please) I estimate that at least 90% of the time that I want to add an entry to DKIMWLAddresses that I put two lines, one for @domain.com and the other to match the subdomains, so .domain.com. That's fine,and works well, but I'd like to see ASSP allow

[Assp-test] Concept question: At rebuild, look at DKIMWLAddresses?

2021-10-23 Thread K Post
*Would it be possible to have ASSP consider DKIMWLAddress matches during rebuild, removing matching messages from spam, without rebuild taking too much of a performance hit? * During rebuild, ASSP runs rb_whitelisted against each message in the spam corpus, and if a match is found against the

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21293

2021-10-20 Thread K Post
Thanks for giving this more consideration. I think these GUI changes will help many! The examples of NWLI are great and clarify a lot. The only thing I don't see in the example is* the use of the + (only) switch and how it differs from just having a N instead of N+ for example. * I see where

Re: [Assp-test] Does Message Score build from Bomb matches override a DKIMNP match??

2021-10-18 Thread K Post
I would > lose my way and my composure > > > > Thomas > > NWLI will get an improvement and a small fix in the next version. > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list"

Re: [Assp-test] Does Message Score build from Bomb matches override a DKIMNP match??

2021-10-18 Thread K Post
I guess I should have written . !!!N-W-L-I-!!! option to override this default behavior On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:24 AM K Post wrote: > Well that'll do it! I incorrectly thought all these years that "no > processing" actually meant NO processing.Looking back, the NWL

Re: [Assp-test] Does Message Score build from Bomb matches override a DKIMNP match??

2021-10-18 Thread K Post
ing mails. > bombReNP > or > =>NWLI is used (N at least for this regex) > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:17.10.2

[Assp-test] Does Message Score build from Bomb matches override a DKIMNP match??

2021-10-16 Thread K Post
I had an inbound message rejected by ASSP, where the DKIM signature matched DKIMNP. I would have thought that if there's a DKIMNP match, that the message will just be passed and saved in discarded. Also, Senderbase is white for the network that it came from. so that should have reduced the score

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21287

2021-10-16 Thread K Post
679) line 5. - BDB: On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 12:51 PM K Post wrote: > Again, thanks. > So are you recommending that $BDBerrLog stay at the default of 0 under > normal circumstances, and only be changed to 1 if there appears to be > something awry with one or more BDB actions? &

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21287

2021-10-15 Thread K Post
BerkeleyDB (and recovers if > possible). If there occure errors at runtime for BerkeleyDB, someone can > enable 'BDBErrLog' to get the runtime errors recorded. > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > a

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21287

2021-10-14 Thread K Post
Whew you've been busy! Thank you. - If msvcrt is being used, would 512 open files ever not be enough? I feel like I was getting the file issues when many links to BDB-error.txt files were getting stuck open, so exceeding 512, but that was ultimately because of my stupid griplist

Re: [Assp-test] Too many open files - Windows

2021-10-11 Thread K Post
path to the griplist!!! Thank you, as always, to Thomas for helping figure this one out!! On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:35 PM K Post wrote: > Looking way better Thomas. Thank you. > > Connected: session:23D15F00 154.21.28.20:60788 > (assp internal ip):25 > > (smtp internal ip):25 >

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21280

2021-10-11 Thread K Post
path to the griplist!!! Thank you, as always, to Thomas for helping figure this one out!! On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:34 PM K Post wrote: > So this is odd running handle on perl.exe gives me stuff I'd expect > (though I don't know what it all is) > >78: File (RW-) > C:

Re: [Assp-test] Multiple topics: Griplist vs GripList, stuck open handles to dbd-error on windows, more.

2021-10-11 Thread K Post
igurable in the registry - > hex(2710)) > > use Testlimit.exe / Testlimit64.exe -h > > How ever - the c-library used by the process sets the handle (and other) > limits! If a valid but not-default-system c-lib is found in the PATH, it > will be used (with there internal limit s

Re: [Assp-test] Multiple topics: Griplist vs GripList, stuck open handles to dbd-error on windows, more.

2021-10-11 Thread K Post
.exe -h > > How ever - the c-library used by the process sets the handle (and other) > limits! If a valid but not-default-system c-lib is found in the PATH, it > will be used (with there internal limit settings). > > assp never uses more than 2000 handles (typical less than 100

Re: [Assp-test] Multiple topics: Griplist vs GripList, stuck open handles to dbd-error on windows, more.

2021-10-10 Thread K Post
And I'm noticing that each time rebuildspamdb runs, at least one more (it >think< it may be two every time) handle to \tmpDB\rebuildDB\BDB-error.txt is left open. On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 4:35 PM K Post wrote: > answering part of one of my own questions - I hope

Re: [Assp-test] Multiple topics: Griplist vs GripList, stuck open handles to dbd-error on windows, more.

2021-10-09 Thread K Post
that's where the explanation should go, instead of in the section where you decide to share and use a shared griplist. (I still can't figure out if you do share and download the griplist it that download replaces your local griplist or what) On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 10:19 AM K Post wrote

[Assp-test] Multiple topics: Griplist vs GripList, stuck open handles to dbd-error on windows, more.

2021-10-09 Thread K Post
Several related items here: 1. Bug? Rebuild process still uploading griplist, even if disabled, due possibly to case error in code. 2. ASSP not checking for valid griplist, if an invalid folder name is entered 3. On windows, Rebuild process leaving

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21280

2021-10-08 Thread K Post
appens when there TLS errors with the new versions though that somehow gets more of these griplist\dbd-error.txt handels to open until there no more file handles left On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 7:27 PM K Post wrote: > That's funny Bob, I was just looking at Sysinternals to see if there was >

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21280

2021-10-08 Thread K Post
Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. < bcoff...@infofromdata.com> wrote: > I'm curious what handle (Sysinternals tool) says when you hit the file > limit... > > - Bob > > On 10/8/2021 10:47 AM, K Post wrote: > > And a similar thing just happened again with 2128

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21280

2021-10-08 Thread K Post
And a similar thing just happened again with 21280. ASSP gets to the point where it can't open any more files, griplist can't be opened, and it goes into a shutdown process. On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 2:50 PM K Post wrote: > Here's excerpts from my log. Odd stuff and concerning. > > &

Re: [Assp-test] Crashed ASSP with fat-fingered Regex mistake

2021-10-07 Thread K Post
Thanks for the fix in 21280! " the definition of an invalid regular expression in 'NotifyRe' may caused a crash of the assp process" On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 1:53 PM K Post wrote: > Nothing urgent, but I managed to completely crash assp by entering an > invalid regex. > > In

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21280

2021-10-07 Thread K Post
nfidenceGraphStats-2021-10.txt Oct-07-21 12:00:06 Info: saving internal Caches in to folder d:/assp/tmpDB/files Oct-07-21 12:00:06 Closing all databases Oct-07-21 12:00:06 Info: removing all WEB listeners Oct-07-21 12:00:06 *Info: shutdown reason was: try restarting ASSP on exception* Oct-07-21 12

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21280

2021-10-07 Thread K Post
Uh oh. I haven't moved away from the test version you provided yesterday yet, but I just got a complete ASSP crash, which was preceded by: error: Worker_1 accept to client failed IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x881a0c40) (timeout: 2 s) : Too many open files error: Worker_2 accept to client failed

[Assp-test] Crashed ASSP with fat-fingered Regex mistake

2021-10-06 Thread K Post
Nothing urgent, but I managed to completely crash assp by entering an invalid regex. In trying to keep on eye on the annoying failed TLS smtp server pool, I intended to put a NotifyRE together like: connected: session:(.){8} 154\.21\. To start, I entered, I was going to first try Connected:

Re: [Assp-test] Too many open files - Windows

2021-10-06 Thread K Post
y for that to work? On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:08 AM Thomas Eckardt wrote: > try https://sourceforge.net/p/assp/svn/HEAD/tree/assp2/trunk/test/ > > tell me if and how it works for you > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"

Re: [Assp-test] Too many open files - Windows

2021-10-05 Thread K Post
to client 154.21.114.200 failed IO::Socket::SSL=GLOB(0x2b79ffd0) (timeout: 5 s) : SSL accept attempt failed On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:18 AM K Post wrote: > I've seen this a couple times now with 21277. Windows. > > error: unable to close Socket IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x10fd4f70) - - Bad > f

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21277

2021-10-05 Thread K Post
mmdb and spamdb. > > In my case the delay was ~25 seconds for ~10 million database records. > > >Is that part of the improved error handling for SSL SMTP sessions over > port 25? > > yes. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An

[Assp-test] Too many open files - Windows

2021-10-05 Thread K Post
I've seen this a couple times now with 21277. Windows. error: unable to close Socket IO::Socket::INET=GLOB(0x10fd4f70) - - Bad file descriptor and Oct-05-21 08:51:09 *** (our internal smtp ip):25 didn't work, trying others... - Too many open files Oct-05-21 08:51:09 Error: couldn't create

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.6 *SPAM-Evaporator* build 21277

2021-10-04 Thread K Post
Thank you Thomas!!! This version solved my very slow startup with the rebuild spamdb worker. I am seeing some entries like: got an unexpected TLSv1_2 handshake Client-Helo-Frame of version (3.3) from IP '154.21.28.74' at local IP '(my ip here)' and Port '25' - this frame is ignored I don't

Re: [Assp-test] Rebuild SpamDB worker thread at startup hangs

2021-10-04 Thread K Post
Confirmed! The new version starts up nice and quick On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:56 AM Doug Lytle wrote: > On 10/3/21 7:53 PM, K Post wrote: > > Thanks Doug. How long does it take to start the rebuild SpamDB worker > > though? Mine also runs 11, and seemingly fine

Re: [Assp-test] Rebuild SpamDB worker thread at startup hangs

2021-10-03 Thread K Post
Thanks Doug. How long does it take to start the rebuild SpamDB worker though? Mine also runs 11, and seemingly fine, it just takes a long time to start. I don't know why it starts before the GUI or SMTP, but suspect that it needs to be running if it's going to track mail for the rebuild as

Re: [Assp-test] Rebuild SpamDB worker thread at startup hangs

2021-10-01 Thread K Post
make sense to first have SMTP and the GUI operational first? On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 2:33 PM K Post wrote: > Thank you Thomas!! I will run through these steps this weekend and report > back. > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:03 PM Thomas Eckardt < > thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrot

Re: [Assp-test] Rebuild SpamDB worker thread at startup hangs

2021-09-29 Thread K Post
t; debugging for the rebuild) > - wait until this task is finished > - stop assp > > - start assp from commandline - everythng should work like expected > - stop assp > - start the service > > Thomas > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP

[Assp-test] Rebuild SpamDB worker thread at startup hangs

2021-09-29 Thread K Post
If I restart my server or just the ASSP windows service, I've discovered that ASSP generally will no longer fully start automatically as a service. I'm sure there's something misconfigured, corrupt, or broken on my machine. If the Windows server crashes or does an after hours update restart,

Re: [Assp-test] Migration Tips - windows & mysql

2021-09-09 Thread K Post
he option > 'ExportMysqlDB' and before importing the configuration and databases in the > new operating system. > > Good luck > > Bye. > > > > Leo. > > > > *De:* K Post [mailto:nntp.p...@gmail.com] > *Enviado el:* miƩrcoles, 08 de septiembre de 2021 17:41 > *Pa

Re: [Assp-test] Logging Options: Log filled with SEGV warnings

2021-09-09 Thread K Post
But keep in mind: bad conditions in any file caused by the fault, can lead > in to bad behavior or crashes of assp in future (possibly in months or in > years, depends on the config, GUI actions, configuration changes, perl > module changes ..) > > Thomas > > > &g

[Assp-test] Migration Tips - windows & mysql

2021-09-08 Thread K Post
Hi, I'm excited to have received a new (to us but still old) donated server for our charity. I'd like to move the current ASSP installation away from Windows 2012 and install Windows 2019. (linux isn't an option due to policy). I'm running MySQL on the current installation. To migrate the

Re: [Assp-test] Logging Options: Log filled with SEGV warnings

2021-09-08 Thread K Post
wrote: > The state of the assp folders and files (also the assp.cfg !!!) may be > unexpected after a 'disk full' condition happened. > > I recommend to restore a known good state. > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:

Re: [Assp-test] Logging Options: Log filled with SEGV warnings

2021-09-04 Thread K Post
l work on windows. > > >I have everything on my C drive in c:\ASSP\logs. > Is there any good reason to this at a production system??? > > Thomas > > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < >

Re: [Assp-test] Logging Options: Log filled with SEGV warnings

2021-09-04 Thread K Post
to > signal SEGV in > > >I just don't know if putting a drive letter in the config is another > option. > No, this will not work. But links will work on windows. > > >I have everything on my C drive in c:\ASSP\logs. > Is there any good reason to this at a production sys

Re: [Assp-test] Logging Options: Log filled with SEGV warnings

2021-09-03 Thread K Post
net> wrote: > On 2021-09-03 09:11, K Post wrote: > > > 1) Can the logfile configuration be set to use a different disk? > > > This was relatively easy on linux. I do not know if Windows has a similar > functionality. Basically the ASSP log directories are re-directed to &g

[Assp-test] Logging Options: Log filled with SEGV warnings

2021-09-03 Thread K Post
Summary: 1) Get log files to separate disk on Windows system 2) Stop repeating warnings from filling log? Yesterday and today, my log filled with Sep-03-21 02:50:05 Warning: got unexpected signal SEGV in Worker_10001: package - Win32::Unicode::Dir, file -

[Assp-test] ASSP with Office365 - discussion

2021-07-28 Thread K Post
Hello everyone, One department with their own subdomain at our charity is going to be moving to Office365 for email. I want to be able to *keep ASSP in use for this handful of users*, but could use some guidance from the community here. My plan is: 1) Inbound mail to dept1.ourcharity.org will

[Assp-test] Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker - try again

2021-05-17 Thread K Post
I'm desperate for help. It seems that ASSP has thread problems frequently when it reloads the config. I see warnings that the Main_Thread is unable to transfer connection to any worker, often every 5 minutes for hours. May-17-21 20:40:35 Saving config May-17-21 20:40:35 Info: no configuration

Re: [Assp-test] Feature Reqiest: Customizing more of the 554 5.7.1 error messages in rejections

2021-05-07 Thread K Post
flexible and more detailed error explanations - possibly in local > language > - much less (than in your suggestion) confusing reply configurations > - keeps hardcoded (and required) 5xx reply codes > - the assp code can force skipping the explanation addition where it is > really not wanted

[Assp-test] Feature Reqiest: Customizing more of the 554 5.7.1 error messages in rejections

2021-05-05 Thread K Post
Thomas, First, as requested, I've tried to change the way I generally ask for features. I hope this is better, helpful, and fully explains my reasoning. Just like we can customize the spamError, DelayError, NoValidRecipient, and other reasons that appear in rejection/delay messages to the

Re: [Assp-test] Senderbase Matching Substring

2021-05-03 Thread K Post
planations and examples in the web. > > Suggestions for new features or changes are wellcome. How ever: I prever > to see something like 'I saw, changed, tested and got very good results > ...' - than something like 'would'nt it be nice to have' > > > Thomas > >

Re: [Assp-test] HeloBlacklistIgnore still matching helo?

2021-04-30 Thread K Post
who would need them? > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:30.04.2021 17:39 > Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] HeloBlacklistIgnore still

Re: [Assp-test] HeloBlacklistIgnore still matching helo?

2021-04-30 Thread K Post
t;I see: HELO Blacklist: '*mta-85-129.sparkpostmail.com* > <http://mta-85-129.sparkpostmail.com/>' > > this is the result line from the analyzer - the analyzer shows every > match, it's on YOU to know that a heloBlacklistIgnore match will skip the > helo checks for real ma

Re: [Assp-test] HeloBlacklistIgnore still matching helo?

2021-04-30 Thread K Post
'nt exists in assp . what it is > LOL > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" > An:"ASSP development mailing list" < > assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:29.04.2021 16:04 > Bet

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >