I was wondering if there is anyone following the list that has this or
similar PCI cards running in a 1U server. If so, could you possibly
recommend a PCI card bus adapter? I'm not sure exactly which kind I'll
need.
I plan on researching the different types of adapters I can purchase for
my
I have some 1-U servers running using Xeon processors with the Asus
RS100-E7/PI2 barebone. There's only room for a single card and in my
case I am using PCI-E Sangoma B500 cards. Geometry is the basic
problem. But this should not be a problem for your T1/E1 card. I had
problems using a
On 05/31/2013 03:42 PM, jg wrote:
I have some 1-U servers running using Xeon processors with the Asus
RS100-E7/PI2 barebone. There's only room for a single card and in my
case I am using PCI-E Sangoma B500 cards. Geometry is the basic
problem. But this should not be a problem for your T1/E1
Shaun,
Follwing more tests :
1) In production box asterisk works with 2.4.X dahdi tree + kernel
2.33.x tree. I can put the trunk up and recieve some calls .
2) In the same box I had tested dahdi 2.6.X + same kernel, when run
dahdi_cfg this error messages comes , in dahdi_cfg running and
Hello Shaun,
I take this approach :
- zaptel 1.2.XX , 1.4.XX I can see interrupts working , I made some
patches to compile in 2.6.32 kernel tree.
- dahdi 2.0.0 to dahdi-2.2.0, I can see interrupts working, I made some
patches to compile in 2.6.32 kernel tree
- This itop from 2.2.0 tree
Hello Shaun,
1) dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.0.2+2.2.0 , is generatiing 1K int/s after
patches..
2) Looking in 2.2.1 code, i see to wct4xxp.c the alarmdebounce set in
2500 and in 2.2.0 the alarmdebounce seted to 0,
I load the module with alarmdebouce=0 paramter = the interrupts are up
to 1000
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:11:12PM -0200, Marcio Gomes wrote:
Hello Shaun,
1) dahdi-linux-complete-2.2.0.2+2.2.0 , is generatiing 1K int/s
after patches..
2) Looking in 2.2.1 code, i see to wct4xxp.c the alarmdebounce set
in 2500 and in 2.2.0 the alarmdebounce seted to 0,
I load the
Shaun,
snip
Just thinking out loud here but I'm guessing it may be fair to just
set alarmdebounce to 0 by default on gen1 cards.
With dahdi-linux 2.2.0.2 does your card function if you set alarm
debounce to 2500?
/etc/init.d/dahdi stop
sleep 3
modprobe dahdi
modprobe wct4xxp debug=1
Helo,
I am upgrading a linux box ( Slackware + asterisk 1.0 + zaptel 0.9 ) to
new asterisk 1.8 + dahdi.
- In old softwares versions the box is working well.
- After upgrade to slackware 13.37 + dahdi ( 2.3.X to SVN ) + asterisk ,
before asterisk is loaded and PRI/E1 Cables ( Span 1/2 ) + T1
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:23:53AM -0200, Marcio Gomes wrote:
- After upgrade to slackware 13.37 + dahdi ( 2.3.X to SVN ) +
asterisk , before asterisk is loaded and PRI/E1 Cables ( Span 1/2 )
+ T1 ( Span 3/4 for Addtran channels banks ) ,
all Spans are in OK ( Green ) mode.
- I go to
On 07-02-12 16:30, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
[snip]
It looks like your development box is having problems with
interrupts from the card. Once you run dahdi_cfg for the span you
should be getting 1 interrupts/sec and above I can see you only
got 28.
I've seen this recently with some risers
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 07-02-12 16:30, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
[snip]
It looks like your development box is having problems with
interrupts from the card. Once you run dahdi_cfg for the span you
should be getting 1 interrupts/sec and above I can
On 07-02-12 17:54, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
[snip]
I hear what you're saying although I don't think it's practical in
this case.
[snip]
Thank you for your elaborate feedback. It's clear why you are the one
developing and I send my 0.02 to the mailinglist :) I see your point.
Digging in
Hello Shaun,
Thanks for your answer, I try all dahdi I can compile in Slackware 13.1
and 13.37 ( recently I downgrade to 13.1, to compile some
older kernels, but it is not the answer. )
It looks like your development box is having problems with
interrupts from the card. Once you run
Hello Shaun,
Thanks for your answer, I try all dahdi I can compile in Slackware 13.1 and
13.37 ( recently I downgrade to 13.1, to compile some
older kernels, but it is not the answer. )
It looks like your development box is having problems with
interrupts from the card. Once you run
Hello All,
I really not understand de APIC changes in IO-APIC- and the
greater 100 Interrupt numbers in old setups.. can you help me ?
I forget to say,
In production BOX, I only do a linux -R newconfig reboot ,
slots , hardware, setup, etc.. is the same.. no changes. It's give me a
News from Zaptel..
I patch the last zaptel.1.2.27 to compiles in 2.6.33 kernels series
Surprise !!
20: 68011 71871 IO-APIC-fasteoi wct4xxp
in zttool the spans are RED, all is working with pre 1.4 zaptel and dahdi.
The problems are in changes between zaptel.1.2.X and
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:36:24PM -0400, Dave George wrote:
I opened the jumpers on the card putting them in T1 mode and it worked. I
had them set to T1 using the options in the dahdi.conf file under
/etc/modprobe.d/
That worked well for over a year until it started acting up.
Any chance
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P hardware problems
If it doesn't go green when you put a hard loopback on the port
TE410P card down.
I have three (3) TE410P in one machine running asterisk with SS7.
My problems started last week when one of my cards started switching to E1
every time after reboot. I set the following in dahdi.conf and that solve
the problem.
/etc/modprobe.d/
options wct4xxp
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:22:46PM -0400, Dave George wrote:
TE410P card down.
I have three (3) TE410P in one machine running asterisk with SS7.
My problems started last week when one of my cards started switching to E1
every time after reboot. I set the following in dahdi.conf and that
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Shaun Ruffell
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P hardware problems
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:22:46PM -0400, Dave George wrote:
TE410P card down.
I have three (3
] On Behalf Of Shaun Ruffell
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P hardware problems
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:22:46PM -0400, Dave George wrote:
TE410P card down.
I have three (3) TE410P in one machine
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TE410P hardware problems
dmesg:
wct4xxp :0a:03.0: SPAN 9: Primary Sync Source
wct4xxp :0a:03.0: Span 2 configured for ESF/B8ZS
wct4xxp :0a:03.0: SPAN 10: Primary Sync Source
wct4xxp :0a:03.0
I've just encountered an odd problem with our Digium TE410P card and was
wondering if anyone has experienced something similar before.
We utilize all 4 ports with 2 of them connected to the PSTN as E1 with the
second 2 ports connecting to a device which accepts T1. We are essentially
acting as an
Le 22/02/2010 09:28, Conor McTernan a écrit :
I've just encountered an odd problem with our Digium TE410P card and
was wondering if anyone has experienced something similar before.
There is one similar request on this list from a few weeks back iirc
We quickly removed the card and checked the
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote:
There is one similar request on this list from a few weeks back iirc
Oh, I'd looked through the archives/googled etc. but could not find
anything similar. I'll take another stab at the archives.
We quickly removed the
I am having a problem with configuring TE410P card. I am using C2SBX+
motherboard from supermicro with fc11 os
After installing the dahdi drivers and running the command
/etc/init.d/dahdi start, the output of /proc/interrupts shows only 2
interrupts generated (I have enabled only 2 spans in
Hi,
I tried upgrading from debian's 1.4.21.2 package to vanilla 1.4.22 but
then my TE410P alarms stay RED and no zap channels can be created, even
if they are correctly listed by zap show channels. I tried adding
dahdichanname = no to asterisk.conf's [options] to no effect.
Going back to
Bonjour Louis-David,
Asterisk envoie-t-il le signal au boitier pour le failover ?
Laurent
Le 11 nov. 08 à 08:49, Louis-David Mitterrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g a écrit :
Hi,
I tried upgrading from debian's 1.4.21.2 package to vanilla 1.4.22
but
then my TE410P alarms stay RED and no zap
Hi,
I'm sorry i didn't check the recipient while replying.
Sorry about the noise...
Laurent
Le 11 nov. 08 à 11:44, Laurent Caron [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Bonjour Louis-David,
Asterisk envoie-t-il le signal au boitier pour le failover ?
Laurent
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 09:49:14AM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Hi,
I tried upgrading from debian's 1.4.21.2 package to vanilla 1.4.22 but
then my TE410P alarms stay RED and no zap channels can be created, even
if they are correctly listed by zap show channels. I tried adding
I have a TE410P in a Dell 2650 running in production on an older redhat
distribution. The various packages have gotten old and I can no longer
been able to build asterisk on this machine. I have prepaired another
2650 running SUSE Enterprise 10.1 sp2 (my workplace standard) to replace
it with.
I'm trying to connect an Asterisk T1 port to a
Dialogic card. The Dialogic side is an external VMS.
I setup for ISDN-PRI between systems and have
green lights on both card/ports. Zttool shows connection is good also.
However, when I tryattempt terminate or
originate a call to either
Can I mix these in a single system... having problems getting
the tor2 driver or the wct4xxp drivers to load, although they
seem fine if alone in the system.
span=1,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=1-23dchan=24
span=2,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=25-47dchan=48
span=3,0,0,esf,b8zsbchan=49-71dchan=72
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:59:21AM -0400, Alexander Lopez wrote:
Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs.
A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows:
1 - 4
2 - 5
3 - NU
4 - 1
5 - 2
6 - NU
7 - NU
8 - NU
NU = Not Used
I
Hi Louis-David,
Check without crc4
Best Regards,
Francois BERGERET.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Louis-David
Mitterrand
Envoyé : dimanche 23 avril 2006 09:39
À : asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Objet : [Asterisk-Users] TE410P card
part de Louis-David
Mitterrand
Envoyé : dimanche 23 avril 2006 09:39
À : asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Objet : [Asterisk-Users] TE410P card connection (was: Pinouts for
T1/E1crossover cable)
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:59:21AM -0400, Alexander Lopez wrote:
Can't anyone stop self-promotion
Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:snip
Should I use a T1 cross cable to connect the telco's socket to the
TE410P card?
When I tried straight cat5 cables, both leds remained red at each end.
However this E1 socket works fine with the Matra PBX, so it must be a
cable problem or TE410P
For the moment, if you need FAX tone detection, you will need to use
'vpmdtmfsupport=0' in your module configuration for loading the wct4xxp
module; this will not disable the echo canceler, just stop using it for
tone detection.
Any idea if/when this will be addressed? We had been going
George Pajari wrote:
For the moment, if you need FAX tone detection, you will need to use
'vpmdtmfsupport=0' in your module configuration for loading the wct4xxp
module; this will not disable the echo canceler, just stop using it for
tone detection.
Any idea if/when this will be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I changed from a TE410P to a TE411P and fax carriers weren't detected
anymore !
I have tried everything (recompile zaptel+asterisk+spandsp ;
echocancel=yes/no ; rxgain=0/txgain=0 ; increase Wait() ; ...), nothing
worked.
The only solution that worked for me was to
Kevin - if you stop it from tone detection with 'vpmdtmfsupport=0' will it detect the fax cgn?RegardsRobOn 12/04/06, Kevin P. Fleming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I changed from a TE410P to a TE411P and fax carriers weren't detected anymore ! I have tried everything
Rob Lith wrote:
Kevin - if you stop it from tone detection with 'vpmdtmfsupport=0' will it
detect the fax cgn?
Yes, that was the point of my message; with that setting, the software
tone detector will be used, just as it was before the OP's VPM got
installed.
I changed from a TE410P to a TE411P and fax carriers weren't detected
anymore !
I have tried everything (recompile zaptel+asterisk+spandsp ;
echocancel=yes/no ; rxgain=0/txgain=0 ; increase Wait() ; ...), nothing
worked.
The only solution that worked for me was to install and use NVFaxDetect.
HTH.
Hi,
You could only take timing from one E1 per card. So you should use :
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
instead of :
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=3,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=4,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
Le
Olivier Perrin ha scritto:
Hi,
You could only take timing from one E1 per card. So you should use :
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
instead of :
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=2,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
span=3,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
Hello!
I have a TE410P quad span card with 4 E1, i am using asterisk 1.2.1, i was
using it without any issues earlier with just 1 E1 on span 1 and i recently
plugged in 3 more E1's, only span 1 is working, the e1 for span 1 is from a
different provider then the rest, the settings are same for
-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P E1 Red Alarm
Hello!
I have a TE410P quad span card with 4 E1, i am using asterisk 1.2.1, i
was
using it without any issues earlier with just 1 E1 on span 1 and i
recently
plugged in 3 more E1's, only span 1 is working, the e1 for span 1
Pure guess...
The red alarm is essentially suggesting there is no signal coming into the
port. By signal I mean the low level pcm data clocking seen on any T1/E1
that is connected to a remote T1/E1 port (regardless of whether that device
has been turned up for service or not).
Possible
Hi,
I also experienced broken page receiving fax on asterisk + spandsp
with Digium TE410P. I also tried diff. versions of spandsp and
asterisk, still no luck.
I had no issues using the same asterisk + spandsp config with TE110P.
Any ideas?
At 09:21 AM 11/24/2005, you wrote:
Hi, All
TE405p and spandsp works good.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Hi, All
Does any one has successful experience use te410p and spandsp together?
Could they work well with all 120 channels receive/send fax at the same time?
My practice is that rxfax always get broken fax page.
Help!___
--Bandwidth and
-
From: Ma Zhiyong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:21 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P and SPANDSP
Hi, All
Does any one has successful experience use te410p and spandsp
I'm trying to install a TE410P this is what happens with compiled zaptel
1.0.9, 1.2-beta and 1.0.9 from http://updates.xorcom.com/iso/
this is my zaptel.conf (checked with the provider the values):
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
bchan=1-15,17-31
dchan=16
loadzone=it
defaultzone=it
then I modprobe
I'm hoping for help on installing a second TE410P card in a system. I'm
confused about 2 things.
1. The rotary switch on the first card should be set to 0 and second card 1?
2. When adding the second card to zaptel.conf - is the new card span=5 or
span=1:
example:
span=1,0,0,d4,ami or
Ma Zhiyong wrote:
I'm sure use my telco as clock src, and my libtiff is also v3.5.7,
while problem still exist.
Shall I contact with my telco for timing?
in zaptel.conf, I set
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3
span=2,2,0,ccs,hdb3
span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3
span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3
To trace rxfax, just turn on debug
Hi, Steve
Thank you for your hard
work.
Yes, I use EuroISDN. My four E1s
connect toan Alcatel S12 Switch that works on PSTN. My Telco. turn CRC4
off, sodo I.
And I'll askthem turn it on.
I have no X-Windows problem. I run
* on Redhat 9.0 and my run level is 3.
That
Ma Zhiyong schrieb:
...
Trace shows that the fax is received successfully.
Aug 17 12:01:10 VERBOSE[19571]: -- Executing RxFAX(Zap/94-1,
Hi,
sorry, I don't know the solution to your problem, but I would like
to know, how did you get that trace?
I'm looking for a reliable way to
What is your libtiff version?
I run tiff-v3.5.7, and it receives fine.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
I'm sure use my telco as clock src, and my libtiff is
also v3.5.7, while problem still exist.
Shall I contact with my telco for timing?
in zaptel.conf, I set
span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3span=2,2,0,ccs,hdb3span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3
span=4,0,0,ccs,hdb3
To trace rxfax, just turn on debug trace
Hi,
I just setup a fax server by spandsp. But
it doesn't look good. Becauseeach fax I received from my fax machine is
not completed.
I use te410p work with it. While the voice
call is good.
Any ideas?
Trace shows that the fax is received
successfully.
Aug 17 12:01:10
Time and time again. CHECK YOUR Span clock src./bOn Aug 16, 2005, at 10:18 PM, Ma Zhiyong wrote: Hi, I just setup a fax server by spandsp. But it doesn't look good. Because each fax I received from my fax machine is not completed. I use te410p work with it. While the voice call is good.
?
-- Mike Murdock
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P
Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
and there's
CVS HEAD as of today.
I have replaced my 1st gen TE410P with a second gen card, and recompiled
zaptel and libpri. However, all I get is a red alarm on span 1, and
cannot make or receive calls.
If I replace the 2nd gen with the first gen card and recompile then I
have no alarms, and I can
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
If I replace the 2nd gen with the first gen card and recompile then I
have no alarms, and I can make and receive calls.
Is there anything that I need to do to make the 2nd gen card work ?
Call Digium technical support, that's what they are there for.
Hello list,
Did anyone already get the T410P card running in an
HP-Compaq DL380 G4 server? If yes, how?
I'm using Fedora Core 3 with 2.6.11-1.35_FC3smp Kernel package.
Thanks in advance,
Roland
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
, but the never generates an interrupt under /proc/interrupts
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Zagler
Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2005 4:52 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P card
Title: Mensaje
Hi
all,
I have to
interconnect Asterisk with a Siemens HIPATH 3750. In siemens we can configure
ECMA-QSIG Master, ISO-QSIG Master,Point to Point link withCRC4 and
Point to Point link withouthCRC4): Siemens has BNC connector.
I use a balun with BNC and RH45
connectro. I
Hello,
Sergio Serrano wrote:
I have to interconnect Asterisk with a Siemens HIPATH 3750.
I have configured siemens like Point to Point with and withouth CRC4 and
Asterisk with ccs,hdb3 ( with CRC4 and withouth CRC4), with pri_net and
pri_cpe and signalling=euroisdn
Anyone has
Hi. I'm just trying to install a TE410P card (jumped as E1). But I'm having problems loading the kernel module.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# modprobe wct4xxp
/lib/modules/2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp/misc/wct4xxp.o: init_module: No such device
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module
Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
lspci -v says:
02:08.0 Communication controller: Unknown device d161:0410 (rev 02)
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 52
Memory at dd20 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128]
There's nothing in the PCI device database
but a customer of ours has a T110P which is detected like this:
09:04.0 Network controller: Individual Computers - Jens Schoenfeld Intel 537
Subsystem: Unknown device 79de:0001
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 7
I/O ports at cc00 [size=256]
Memory at df5ff000 (32-bit,
I've seen that happen before, and I don't remember it being a happy
ending. I think we had to change motherboards to resolve it.
What motherboard brand/model are you using with the T110P?
Brian
On 6/7/05, Juan Pablo Abuyeres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but a customer of ours has a T110P which is
This one:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon800/E7520/X6DHT-G.cfm
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 14:13 -0500, Brian McSpadden wrote:
I've seen that happen before, and I don't remember it being a happy
ending. I think we had to change motherboards to resolve it.
What motherboard
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:18:32PM +0100, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
lspci -v says:
02:08.0 Communication controller: Unknown device d161:0410 (rev 02)
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 52
Memory at dd20 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
(I guess you wanted to ask what motherboard are we using tith the TE410P.)
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 15:50 -0400, Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
This one:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon800/E7520/X6DHT-G.cfm
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 14:13 -0500, Brian McSpadden
Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
and there's nothing for vendor 79de at pcidatabase.com, and the kernel
module loads well. Maybe there's more than one identifier for T410P ?
There's nothing for 79de at pci-sig either
(http://www.pcisig.com/membership/vid_search/search_form/process) and
every PCI
The problem was that I was using the latest stable zaptel. Using the
latest (I don't know how you call it.. head branch?) non-stable version
made it work fine.
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
and there's nothing for vendor 79de at pcidatabase.com, and the
kernel module loads
Hmm, I did a cvs co -D 04/30/05 zaptel, and this version works fine -
the TE410P comes up no problems. Seems to be the same issue as the #4155
bug.
Julian.
Asterisk wrote:
Thanks Kevin, but I have done all you suggested. There is a closed bug
on the bug tracking system (#4155) which seems
I have a TE410P running on CentOS 4 which (fortunately) is my test
system. This card has been working flawlessly for the past few weeks.
Today I did a cvs update to the latest head files, and the card is now
not working. When I try a zaptel start, a series of messages appears on
the console:
From: Asterisk
I have a TE410P running on CentOS 4 which (fortunately) is my test
system. This card has been working flawlessly for the past few weeks.
Today I did a cvs update to the latest head files, and the card is now
not working. When I try a zaptel start, a series of messages
When I posted, I meant to say that I updated to CVS-HEAD on all parts of
* (asterisk, libpri,zaptel etc).
Julian.
Asterisk wrote:
I have a TE410P running on CentOS 4 which (fortunately) is my test
system. This card has been working flawlessly for the past few weeks.
Today I did a cvs update
Thanks Kevin, but I have done all you suggested. There is a closed bug
on the bug tracking system (#4155) which seems to suggest a problem with
1st gen cards and the 2nd gen driver. Looks as if I need to speak to
tech support (again - the te410P was a bugger to get going in a HP
proliant
Rod Bacon wrote:
Are you running vga=normal in your lilo.conf? (disable frame buffer)
and running kernel WITHOUT apic and acpi support? (append='noapic
acpi=off).
Making these changes, and disabling all other unused resources (to
eliminiate IRQ sharing) got me to 100% consistently on a
Rod Bacon wrote:
Are you running vga=normal in your lilo.conf? (disable frame buffer)
and running kernel WITHOUT apic and acpi support? (append='noapic
acpi=off).
Making these changes, and disabling all other unused resources (to
eliminiate IRQ sharing) got me to 100% consistently on a
@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P on Dell 2650
Steve Totaro wrote:
Not that this helps your situation but it may help someone at some
point. I have a TE410P in IBM x306 and have no issues. It works
perfectly. (knock on wood)
What does
Title: TE410P on Dell 2650
I have a Poweredge 2650 w/ a TE410P card. I'm getting lots of local echo (my users hear themselves) when calling local telephone numbers.
Echo cancelling helps, but doesn't solve the problem.
From zapata.conf:
echocancel = 64
echocancelwhenbridged = yes
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Watts
Sent: 04 May 2005 20:11
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P on Dell 2650
I have a Poweredge 2650 w/ a TE410P card. I'm getting lots of local echo (my
users hear themselves) when calling local telephone
-Original Message-
From: Aza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:02 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P on Dell 2650
I have a problem with a Dell 1850 and a TE410P card as do a
few others
.
Aaron
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Watts
Sent: 04 May 2005 20:11
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P on Dell 2650
I have a Poweredge 2650 w/ a TE410P card. I'm
Steve Totaro wrote:
Not that this helps your situation but it may help someone at some
point. I have a TE410P in IBM x306 and have no issues. It works
perfectly. (knock on wood)
What does zttest -v look like on your system?
We only see folks post zttest output when they are unhappy. :-)
'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P on Dell 2650
I have a problem with a Dell 1850 and a TE410P card as do a few others who
posted over the weekend.
The problem in this case isn't so much echo but static and chop on all
calls
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Boutilier
Sent: 04 May 2005 21:20
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P on Dell 2650
-Original Message-
From: Aza [mailto:[EMAIL
Are you running vga=normal in your lilo.conf? (disable frame buffer) and
running kernel WITHOUT apic and acpi support? (append='noapic acpi=off).
Making these changes, and disabling all other unused resources (to
eliminiate IRQ sharing) got me to 100% consistently on a DELL 2850.
--
I'm trying to install a TE410P on a Gigabyte motherboard (8S661FX) and
I'm just noticing that the TE410P does not fit in the PCI slot. It
seems as if the little opening in the PCI is on the wrong side. Has
anyone else seen this or is it just me and I'm too stupid to do
something as basic as
It's you.
Get a 3.3v supported Motherboard.
-or-
Grab a Hacksaw. Others will post instructions.
;)
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Daniel Salama wrote:
I'm trying to install a TE410P on a Gigabyte motherboard (8S661FX) and I'm
just noticing that the TE410P does not fit in the PCI slot. It seems as if
the
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P does not fit in motherboard
I'm trying to install a TE410P on a Gigabyte motherboard (8S661FX) and I'm
just noticing that the TE410P does not fit in the PCI slot. It seems as if
the little opening in the PCI is on the wrong side. Has anyone
Salama
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2005 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P does not fit in motherboard
I'm trying to install a TE410P on a Gigabyte motherboard (8S661FX) and I'm
just noticing that the TE410P does not fit in the PCI slot
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Salama
Sent: Thursday, 5 May 2005 9:55 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P does not fit in motherboard
I'm trying to install a TE410P on a Gigabyte motherboard (8S661FX) and I'm
just noticing that the TE410P
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
