On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 01:51 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
>> On 01/05/2011 7:50 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
>>
>>> We've got two noisy kitchens that need to talk back and forth.
>>
>> Andy,
>>
>> Why, exactly, are you trying to combine an inter-kitchen intercom a
On 01/05/2011 01:51 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/05/2011 7:50 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
We've got two noisy kitchens that need to talk back and forth.
Andy,
Why, exactly, are you trying to combine an inter-kitchen intercom and
your phone system? Might it make more sense to have a non-phone-base
> If you do get a Polycom, the old 501 (discontinued) have a louder ring
> (or can be configured to have a louder ring, don`t quite remember)
> then the newer ones. But the others are right: it's not meant for
> this, at least not in a noisy environment. What can work though is a
> Polycom 321,
On 01/05/2011 01:51 PM, Tom Rymes wrote:
On 01/05/2011 7:50 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
We've got two noisy kitchens that need to talk back and forth.
Andy,
Why, exactly, are you trying to combine an inter-kitchen intercom and
your phone system? Might it make more sense to have a non-phone-base
Top link on Google for "stainless steel SIP intercom":
http://www.adamtelco.com/valcom-vip-172l-st-stainless-steel-sip-intercom-
doorphone.html
Cyberdata appears to have another, too:
http://www.alloy.com.au/010935.htm
Yet another:
http://www.zenitel.com/en/Stentofon/Products/Tamper--Vandal-Resi
On 01/05/2011 10:55 AM, Mike wrote:
If you do get a Polycom, the old 501 (discontinued) have a louder ring (or
can be configured to have a louder ring, don`t quite remember) then the
newer ones. But the others are right: it's not meant for this, at least not
in a noisy environment. What can work
On 01/05/2011 7:50 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
We've got two noisy kitchens that need to talk back and forth.
Andy,
Why, exactly, are you trying to combine an inter-kitchen intercom and
your phone system? Might it make more sense to have a non-phone-based
intercom system, plus a phone for maki
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 06:50:19 Andy Graybeal wrote:
> > I'd definitely look into a phone mounted to the wall that has no
> > actual handset, but merely buttons and a speaker grille. It should
> > probably additionally be stainless steel, as I suspect it will need a
> > good cleaning at leas
t: Re: [asterisk-users] VoIP PoE phones for restaurant (kitchen)
> I would. The whole Polycom line seems designed for desktop use, and
> the speakers just don't get very loud. I have especially had this
> complaint about the ring volume, even at some desktops!
>
> In
I would. The whole Polycom line seems designed for desktop use, and the
speakers just don't get very loud. I have especially had this complaint
about the ring volume, even at some desktops!
In the hotels where we have installations that include busy kitchen
extensions there seems to be no substit
On 01/04/2011 09:02 PM, mgra...@mstvp.com wrote:
IMHO G.722 beats "Clarity By Polycom" every time.
I had an IP335 for review before they launched. The audio quality is the
same as the better models (IP450/550/650) only the user interface is
different. Very good speakerphone, too.
Review here:
I'd definitely look into a phone mounted to the wall that has no actual
handset, but merely buttons and a speaker grille. It should probably
additionally be stainless steel, as I suspect it will need a good cleaning
at least daily.
The Polycom phones look great on a desk, but they are not indust
It is indeed possible (quite common, actually) to run the wiring as you
describe. If you want to keep the data and voice traffic separate, you
can use VLANs to do so. Your switches will need to support VLANS, and
you will need to configure VLANs to separate the voice and data traffic.
As I unders
ew-polycom-soundpoint-ip335-entry-level-hdvoice-ip-phone/
Michael Graves
mgraves mstvp.com
o(713) 861-4005
c(713) 201-1262
sip:mjgra...@mstvp.onsip.com
skype mjgraves
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] VoIP PoE phones for restaurant (kitchen)
> From: An
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 16:15:54 Andy Graybeal wrote:
> > The Polycom 321 has not been EOL'd and supports VLAN. It is, however,
> > lacking a 2nd ethernet port if you were to go that route.
> >
> > -M
>
> Thanks for the response Mark. I see the 331 has two ports and the same
> features as th
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Andy Graybeal wrote:
The Polycom 321 has not been EOL'd and supports VLAN. It is, however,
lacking a 2nd ethernet port if you were to go that route.
-M
Thanks for the response Mark. I see the 331 has two ports and the same
features as the 321.
I'm wondering what phone
The Polycom 321 has not been EOL'd and supports VLAN. It is, however,
lacking a 2nd ethernet port if you were to go that route.
-M
Thanks for the response Mark. I see the 331 has two ports and the same
features as the 321.
I'm wondering what phone would be best being used as an intercom in
On 01/04/2011 8:52 AM, Andy Graybeal wrote:
Is it possible that I can run one cable to the phone, then run a cable
from the phone to a computer or another device and have those the phone
and computer or other device be on separate networks?
I'm sorry if this sounds newbish; I'm still learning.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Andy Graybeal
wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 07:53 PM, cjwstudios wrote:
>>
>> Andy,
>> The 501 and 320 are EOL. I'd go for the IP335 and a 2626-PWR, since the
>> 2626 can support vlans you can isolate data and voice. Make sure to
>> spec a UPS on the PoE switch.
>>
>
> C
On 01/03/2011 07:53 PM, cjwstudios wrote:
Andy,
The 501 and 320 are EOL. I'd go for the IP335 and a 2626-PWR, since the
2626 can support vlans you can isolate data and voice. Make sure to
spec a UPS on the PoE switch.
CJW,
Awesome. Thanks for the input. For some reason or another I figured
Andy,
The 501 and 320 are EOL. I'd go for the IP335 and a 2626-PWR, since the
2626 can support vlans you can isolate data and voice. Make sure to spec a
UPS on the PoE switch.
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Andy Graybeal
wrote:
> Greetings,
> I mailed the list regarding an intercom system som
21 matches
Mail list logo
