On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
There's been some discussion on linux-wireless about implementing
channel selection in the way you asked (ie, what channels aren't
busy.)
It should be done in the higher layers, not at the driver layer.
Thanks,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
The fact remains that ath9k on Linux is not mature rock solid in all
different modes and bands, and that hasn't really changed over the
last year and a half I've been around, despite the endless hours that
have been spent on
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Xianghua Xiao xiaoxiang...@gmail.com wrote:
Almost all Atheros-based commercial products on the market are still
based on Atheros's SDK, its driver is still madwifi-based but worked
_reliably_. The IBSS/adhoc driver in that SDK is not fully
done(especially
I only know of one Venema in this world, Dr. Wietse Venema of postfix
fame and more than a handful of other frequently used gems.
How did this host get its name?
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
If I can make a suggestion, and you should take this as a hint about
the direction you (being people on this list) should take - get into
ath9k development. Show initiative and interest, get some work done,
and ask for
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net wrote:
WDS is crap, don't use it. You effectively half the available
bandwidth per node in a WDS network, it's a hack and is only useful if
you want coverage at the sacrifice of bandwidth of the link.
There is one vendor in
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 28 April 2011 09:27, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
There is one vendor in the marketplace where if you want layer 2
transparency on a p-t-p link, you VILL use WDS :(
What's broken about WDS? Just that you halve
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2011-04-28 2:58 AM, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
WDS is crap, don't use it. You effectively half the available
bandwidth per node in a WDS network, it's a hack and is only useful if
you want coverage at the sacrifice of
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
So what do you guys think? OLSR + ad-hoc? Mesh? Multiple AP's and
Stations? WDS? P2P?
Afraid neither code nor community is really quite mature for that
discussion.
Just as I was thinking OpenWrt
wrote, namely:
[quote]
Hi Larry,
AR7240 CPU + AR9280 Radio.
[/quote]
but the difference may not be material, I'll leave that to the developers.
The AR9287 is about 1/4 the size of the AR7240.
HTH.
regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
AR9287-BL1A date code 1004
This doesn't seem to exactly tick and tie with what Ubiquiti wrote,
namely:
[quote]
AR7240 CPU + AR9280 Radio.
[/quote]
but the difference may not be material,
AR9280
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 15 April 2011 23:18, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
Peter and Adrian,
If this post is essentially asking to peek behind Atheros' kimono,
please disregard this post.
Is there any chance that the only diff
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
IOW, do we know for certain whether the entire set of data required
for compliance in every country is stored on each and every chip?
Nope. This is what I meant would be good to gather information about,
with a tool that can
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
I don't know the details of the
calibration at all. It could also be much more coarse, in which case
we eager EEPROM patchers would be in much better shape. :)
Perhaps, at least for Ubiquiti radios, Country Code Compliance
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
I don't know the details of the
calibration at all. It could also be much more coarse, in which case
we eager EEPROM patchers would be in much better shape. :)
Peter, now that I've had more time to think about it, MikroTik
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12 April 2011 11:09, Sujith m.suj...@gmail.com wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
There's actually something in 802.11h that handles switching channels.
Does mac80211 handle sending/receiving CSA?
Yep.
Cool.
Serene,
failed
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 7
tx failed: 0
tx failed: 0
root@jv-2400-ap1:~#
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet
oz Sour mix
* 1 splash Cranberry juice
-
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma
@cpe-wlab:~#
How does a newb set power_save off on an AP?
THANKS/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https
it is? :)
Adrian
On 10 April 2011 03:14, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
While running
|__| W I R E L E S S F R E E D O M
ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT (bleeding edge, r26548) --
as a newb, on APs,
root@hq-0900-ap1:~# iw wlan0 set power_save off
command failed: Operation not supported
:(
THANKS/ldv
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
It should not be doing power saving in access point mode.
Do you think somehow it is? :)
Adrian
On 10 April 2011 03:14, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
While running
|__| W I R E L E S S F R E E
better than I though. :)
This sort of gives a new meaning to Guilt by association.
`[8-))
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel
Link Quality=8/70 Signal level=-102 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:4 Invalid misc:4 Missed beacon:0
root@cpe-crockett:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/power
27
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9 April 2011 11:24, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
Q1. Does the detail below guarantee we are operating at maximum legal
power for the US on the M900 series?
It _seems_ that when we disconnect (see 2nd question
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9 April 2011 11:24, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
Q1. Does the detail below guarantee we are operating at maximum legal
power for the US on the M900 series?
It _seems_ that when we disconnect (see 2nd question
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
Total packet count:: ideal 34 lookaround 6
The total packet count indicates that there's no useful data in there
(probably because a reconnect happened). The MCS7 rate that you saw was
maybe just a probing attempt.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
Total packet count:: ideal 34 lookaround 6
The total packet count
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Halperin
dhalp...@cs.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
learning moment, bitte
What steps are necessary to learn about the reasons for the
disconnects/reconnects?
*identifying the reason code
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
Mindful that we are all ignorant, just about different things, I ask
the ? in the subject line.
Would that not influence the success ratio
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I really do think the key here is figuring out why Larry is seeing such
crazy low signal strength levels.
adrian
Does anyone know if these the AR9280 has a self-test?
ldv
___
In the interest of brevity, I had intended to report the results of
'dmesg | grep CRDA' but said does not indicate as well the possible
problem.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net
Date: Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:09 PM
Subject: IBIBLIO: Loco M900 as CPE @r26524
: 0.00, 0.01, 0.04
root@OpenWrt:~#
- Felix
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Mohammed Shafi shafi.at...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
On Wed
!
End of story.
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Daniel Halperin
dhalp...@cs.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
I think the basic problem may be the hardware has gone south or there
is something special about the M900 series because of the down
converter
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Serene Gud serene_...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
--- On *Wed, 4/6/11, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net* wrote:
From: Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: how to change channels dynamically
To: Serene Gud serene_...@yahoo.co.in
Cc: Adrian
?
Is minstrel what others call EWMA (exponentially weighted moving average)?
kind regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel
: 560
tx packets: 11
tx retries: 65
tx failed: 7
signal: -97 dBm
signal avg: -96 dBm
tx bitrate: 104.0 MBit/s MCS 13
rx bitrate: 6.5 MBit/s MCS 0
best regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma
failed: 0
signal: -79 dBm
signal avg: -78 dBm
tx bitrate: 48.0 MBit/s
rx bitrate: 9.0 MBit/s
best regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection
/downloads/firmwares/XN-fw/v5.3/SDK.UBNT.v5.3.tar.bz2.
HTH.
BTW, what is your application for channel/frequency hopping?
regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k
to config
AR9280 for operation as 1X1 or other ideas from a couple of days ago
on this ml.
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
ath9k-devel
of the bugzilla
report mentioned in the subject line?
If not, what are the possibilities besides a bug in iperf or a cockpit
error on the part of the reporter?
THANKS for your input.
kind regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your
any advice
to achieve desired operation.
THANKS in advance for your help --- it is fully appreciated.
Kind regards/ldv
--
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
===From Mikrotik's manual on the SXT:
If you want to overcome
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
In order to debug this properly, please send a dump of the rate control
stats of both sides:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/netdev:wlan0/stations/*/rc_stats
And also a dump of the channel busy time:
iw wlan0 survey
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2011-03-29 3:33 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
Good morning, ath9k devs and OpenWrt-users.
Please excuse the cross post, not something we normally do.
We have a particularly difficult situation in which we are trying
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
To change the chainmask:
wifi down
echo 1 /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/rx_chainmask
echo 1 /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/tx_chainmask
wifi
On the CPE end this has been done:
root@OpenWrt:~#
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
THANKS in advance for your help --- it is fully appreciated.
To change the chainmask:
wifi down
echo 1 /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/rx_chainmask
echo 1 /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/tx_chainmask
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
option htmode HT5
HT5? Did you add any custom patches, or is this a configuration error?
No sir; see remark about Will Rogers and ignorance; my intent was to
force 5 MHz channel width. Will change per your
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
The packet counts seem rather low, so the client is probably reconnecting
frequently. You should try to find out what triggers the disconnects.
Anything interesting in the kernel log about connection loss? Maybe
something
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
20% busy time with only about 5% combined rx/tx time, I guess there's some
interference on the channel which might be messing with your signal as well.
Please try different channels and compare the survey output there.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2011-03-29 6:08 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Felix Fietkaun...@openwrt.org wrote:
frequently. You should try to find out what triggers the disconnects.
Anything interesting in the kernel
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
Still very noisy and high busy time, something is causing quite a bit of
interference. No idea how to reduce that or track it down though.
Felix and Matt,
Is the channel map that Robert provided for the SR9 applicable to
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2011-03-29 6:04 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Felix Fietkaun...@openwrt.org wrote:
option htmode HT5
HT5? Did you add any custom patches, or is this a configuration error
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
I don't think reboot stability on AirOS is a good indicator for general
stability with OpenWrt on these frequencies. If the devices reboot, that's
an indicator of a driver bug.
I agree with you.
I've had difficulty with
55 matches
Mail list logo
