Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? @6 that is how you do jokes. Also if you are doing a joke, please try to stay away from bringing yourself into it. This was a perfect example. The joke was about someone else, and instead of you coming in and trying to bring you into the joke just because you contributed

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? @mechaSkyGuardian, thank you for making me feel so poppular.  I'll saunter away now, knowing the name Nocturnus has been mentioned in yet another post, bringing my total to 965.  I'm famous!  And no, not really.  I neither need nor want fame nor glory.  I just love helping

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? If you wanna find posts with your name just search your name. there are 964 of them that have the word Nocturnus in them URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/501949/#p501949 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? Nocturnous, you may wanna check Jeremy's site then. Look at his description for the vertual braille taker. Look at the 1ST line. Then come back. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/501942/#p501942 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? "Jayde, you're an ass, you know that?" I mean, seriously!  How dare you bring me into this discussion!  Here was me browsing this forum, entirely to my heart's content, and all of a sudden I see my name without any permission or authorization to use it?  How dare

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? Short answer: you're fine.Even lighter "attacks" often don't result in any punishment. For an example, if I was engaged in some fairly friendly banter with, let's say, Nocturnis, and he said something like, "Jayde, you're an ass, you know that? Well played

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? So the thing with personal attacks, it's more about common sense. Saying oh my gosh, I am an idiot for doing that earlier, I think that's probably not really an attack, that's you observing yourself. Saying someone's a goof or a nut, also seems like much less of an insult

Re: is this ok?

Re: is this ok? Personally I think your ok with wording like that.  However You were right to ask as you can't critizise or make a joke these days without offending someone. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/501766/#p501766 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames

is this ok?

is this ok? Hi. I have a couple of questions. First, I'm extremely likely to call myself an idiot if I've done something stupid. However, I'm not sure if that's ok here. Does insulting yourself fall under the personal attacks rule? Second, what about saying something along the lines

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi all.yeah I'm bringing back an older topic of mine, but some questions came up again regarding touch screens.Someone said that NVDA and touch screen is sorta doable. Thing is, what does work and what doesn't?for example, do I have to swipe

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? NVDA on a tuch screen is ok i guess, the keyboard is actually a lot better. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471490/#p471490 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? i'M using schools smartboard with NVDA lol ant its good so fari evin began to  write it, if your familior with the layout you should be good to go URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471244/#p471244 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? In terms of ultrabooks, I've heard great things about Huawei's Matebook lineup. You can find more about that with https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqBkuyK … mp;t=309s.In that video, the Huawei had a touchscreen. The computer also came

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hmm, sounds good, argh I just don|t know what to get xD.I just created a portable copy of NVDA on an older USB Stick, I'll see if I can convince a person at the electronics store to plug my stick into a win tablet so I can play around

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Yeah, you can put normal win 10 on there, I had to help a friend do that actually. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471171/#p471171 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi.At Pitermach oh urm, lol, don't ask me how I scimmed past the surface laptop all the time, I thought it might be a translation error in German translation and they ment surface book xD.Well, I don't know really if I would use the tablet

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? I got the 13-inch surfacebook 2 a couple months ago. First of all If I'm being honest there are definitely computers with better specs to price rayshows out there. I picked it up partially because I got it along with a new braille display because

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? At costco I saw it with the keyboard included for a lower price, it was a bundle. This was a while ago though. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471159/#p471159 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi.Hmm, that's a pitty, but sorta understandable with the surface pro beeing marketed as a tablet.I suppose I can get it for a lower price at a retail store, just need to see if anything comes up.Greetings Moritz. URL: https

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? @Ty Sadly, they haven’t reduced the price much directly... See https://store.microsoft.com/, for details on that.For example, if ya wanted deals on a ‘Surface Go” with a keyboard cover alongside, ‘Amazon” would be your best shot. Least here

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? My surface didn't, and the keyboard was an extra 150$. Not really happy with microsoft about that one. They might have changed it, though. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471140/#p471140 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi.Oh, I thought that the surface pro devices also came with a keyboard, not that you had to purchase it seperatlly.Yeah I'm thinking about the book, or some ultra book if touch screen usage is more tedious than helping.greetings Moritz. URL

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? I say the book. While i don't have one, they at least come with a keyboard. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471105/#p471105 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Would you generally say that the Surface would be a good device getting in regards to system speed and general quality of the device?I'm currently trying to decide between the surface pro 6, surface book 2, HP g3 and g4.Greetings Moritz. URL

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi.yeah I also looked at the surface because it seams quite interesting, the only thing holding me back really is that it doesn't seam to have any sort of external security installations like a finger print reader.Greetings Moritz. URL: https

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Yeah, I find I lose focus when i'm using the pen with  my surface rather then just swiping, witch i guess makes sense. I have a habit or dragging the pen around, not swiping it as if it's my finger. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/471000

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi.Thanks for the answer.Well, I think you can lose your focus with every touch screen device, iOS, android or Windows, but if you are familiar with how things work, I suppose you could work decently with it, at leased i hope so with windows

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

Re: NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? It works better with a keyboard because with a touch screen you can lose your focus, but it works decently well. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/470962/#p470962 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin

NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK?

NVDA on touch screens, does it work OK? Hi.On my hunt for a new laptop I came over convertibles. i didn't hear the term convertible for the first time and know what these things are, but I never actually checked how modern day screen readers like Narrator, Jaws and NVDA keep up with touch

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell?

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell? "Invalid operation on int" means one of two things: either it thinks something is an int when you treat it like something else (see the "what is p?" issue), or that the variable was not correctly defined (or the name was mistyped), and has

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell?

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell? 0Sorry, forgot to give information, it compilation errors and says something about invalid int or similar. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/467158/#p467158 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell?

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell? Possibilities that cannot be determined from the given code:- Distance?- Are you sure the filename is correct? If loop is -1 after this line, maybe use file_exists on the filename to be sure it's what you meant it to be?- It isn't clear what "me&qu

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell?

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell? no he's using a sound_pool, presumably that object is p. You probably shouldn't have the loop play in the constructor though, that just seems like a bad idea, make it play later. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/466961/#p466961 -- Audiogames-reflector

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell?

Re: Ok bgt, what the hell? I am not too sure, except you have an integer named P.  Try changing it to something else and seeing if your code works, I am assuming it doesn’t because you’re trying to make an integer play a sound. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/466958/#p466958

Ok bgt, what the hell?

Ok bgt, what the hell? So I have the following code fragment as a computer class. Yes, I know it's messy, and I didn't include all of the code, bite me it's just for messing around. Anyway, the loop=p.play part won't work even though I know it works with the exact syntax in other games

Ok bgt, what the hell?

Ok bgt, what the hell? So I have the following code fragment as a computer class. Yes, I know it's messy, and I didn't include all of the code, bite me it's just for messing around. Anyway, the loop=p.play part won't work even though I know it works with the exact syntax in other games

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored The blood rain is ok, but you should  be able to save URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/461331/#p461331 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored Battle of the end of the world is indeed challenging URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/461311/#p461311 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored Code 7 is a perfect text adventure puzzle game. It is not free, but it does have a long demo. It is only 23 U.S. dollars, and it has hours of content. You can watch chris wright’s YouTube streams of code 7 or try it yourself with the demo. Hope this game solves

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored @9, yeah i see what you mean if i'm honest. like i say i don't mind browser stuff either so am not limited to audio games. however, i do take your point with regards to games being or looking the same. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460752/#p460752

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored @1 this is a problem I've been having with audio games for a long time now. Most of the games that come out these days are pretty much the same, so once you've played one, you've played all of them. This may not be the case for some exceptions like sequence storm

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored @8 that's a Chinese game, so you probs won't be able to play it in English without internet translations, and that's not even guarantying that it would be fully playable with these translations. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460730/#p460730

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored hibattle of ArmageddonReally awesome URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460713/#p460713 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored Um.In readme, orhttps://ch-games.ru/en/category/games/ has a little descryption of what you do there. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460711/#p460711 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored where can i read up on it? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460708/#p460708 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored tbr means The blood rain. If you wanna download,http://ch-games.ru/tbr.zip URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460706/#p460706 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored tbr? what is that? don't recognise the abbreviation URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460705/#p460705 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored IF you want a shooting game, go play TBR.Otherwise, AHC is your best bet for a long detailed game. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460700/#p460700 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin

Re: ok am seriously bored

Re: ok am seriously bored warsim defenetly URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/460663/#p460663 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector

ok am seriously bored

ok am seriously bored so i really do not know what i want to play at the moment. i'm feeling seriously game bored at the moment. i recently played entombed again. i'm looking for something with quite a bit of longevity. i have a windows pc and an iPhone so either platform will do. i like

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Yeah I agree up to a point.If someone causes trouble for them selves, let the community speak, but only up until it becomes spammy or overly personal.I think we need better rules around topic spam too, like if there is already a topic

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK I think he would probably apologize, if the fight had been about something else, but the idea that Spaghetti is better than tacos?  Maan!  That really sets him off!  I mean, ya should have seen him that day... URL: https

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Not until he appologizes for that fight. Absolutely not! URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420881/#p420881 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK You know what I hate?  I hate my cousin Juan being brought into all this mess!  Leave Juan out of it, I say!  We should ban anyone who has an issue with Juan! URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420868/#p420868 -- Audiogames

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK I'll start out by saying that I definitely agree with Xoren on the point that repeat opinions are not bad things - because they wouldn't be so bad if they were praises.Here's my thing. I'm all for stating opinions, and I definitely do get

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Nocturnus, agreed. It's true though, and i never said he should ban him cause everyone says so. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420640/#p420640 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK In light of flashing lightning and gathering thunder I'll chime in and consolodate as much as I can by making a ton of 1 and 2 liners responding to a bunch of posts... Your attention is greatly and sincerely appreciated in advance.@cartertemm

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Yeah well, things are getting worse. Every where. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420323/#p420323 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Agreed, 50, and yes, i thought the same. It's interesting that before there weren't many huge dramas, okay maybe there were but they didn't reach this far. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420230/#p420230 -- Audiogames-reflector

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @48 I think you’re losing the point of the topic. This isn’t about silencing opinions.  These are not the days where the form barely had a sense of order. I must admit when Jade first came on as a moderator I thought he was power-hungry

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @48 I think you’re losing the point of the topic. This isn’t about silencing opinions.  These are not the days where the form barely had a sense of order. I must admit when Jade first came on as a moderator I thought he was power-hungry

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @MasterOfDeath You aren't getting it. Closing a topic rather than deleting it also keeps a log of what happened so that users are accountable for the warnings they received. You can't delete history, but the idea is to stop drama

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK But that way you will just have more dramas. It just seems like you want to stop them but still you do not. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420131/#p420131 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK And...that's, uh, exactly what we do -not want. We want forest fires to stop blazing. We do not want to silence you. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420123/#p420123 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Jayde, when did you see an opinion like you claimed in opinion 2?Xoren, i absolutely respect Jayde, just like all moderators, because that's why they have their position, to rule the forum.And on the other hand, agreed with Nuno. If you

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @nuno69 Removing all these topics would, in a way, silence them, and the mods don't want to do that.The thing with Gold Gun and repeated opinions doesn't have much to do with repeated opinions so much as it does with the fact

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK I personally didn't see anything insanely wrong with the Golden Gun thing. It got a bit much, but it wasn't awful. There were other issues that sparked talk of toxicity. It's not just that eleven or so people were saying the same thing about

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK So why just not remove all these topics? URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/420077/#p420077 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Zoran, Thumbs up. more on this belowI guess we really can't just be a forum who respects one another's opinions, right? Because to someof you, if they're not using your programming language, or upgrading like you think they should

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @Xoren, excellent post, I fully agree with you on that one. I don't know a topic that has had civil discussion be closed for some reason or another thus far; someone has always started drama in that topic resulting in it being locked

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Re: Post 21:Finally a moderator who can tell the things without letting his personal emotions to ruin it. Because sadly, one of the staff members likes just closing the topics and every opinion that is different from the accepted one

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK It's hard to just sit by and accept that Mason can get away with what he's doing. That's my thing, and no this isn't an attempt to stir it back up again, here's what I'm saying. I get the staunch opposers' views about it's only a game, why

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK MasterOfDeath, please remember that I have left literally dozens, maybe even hundreds, of negative opinions totally alone. I agree with you that we need a place to be able to express honestly the things we think and feel about games

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Jayde, it was not pointed to Dark. He never wanted to play the big boss here, he treated us as people, and he accepted opinions. It's not about that you don't, but you make it impossible. And no, i'm not attacking you, it's only a honest

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK nuno69 wrote:The sad think is that there is no real alternative to agnet, and if there even was, the people would stay the same which will make no difference.There is no alternative because: As soon as people are trying to make an alternative

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK The sad think is that there is no real alternative to agnet, and if there even was, the people would stay the same which will make no difference. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/419904/#p419904 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Those who forget the pasta are doomed to reheat it. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/419882/#p419882 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Jayde wrote:I try for a plea for reason at virtually every turn. I don't like harmful and toxic labels. I'm not a big fan of attacking or antagonism. I want people to get along. The reason I can be firm is because that's where I am, that's

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Jayde wrote:I try for a plea for reason at virtually every turn. I don't like harmful and toxic labels. I'm not a big fan of attacking or antagonism. I want people to get along. The reason I can be firm is because that's where I am, that's

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Jayde wrote:I try for a plea for reason at virtually every turn. I don't like harmful and toxic labels. I'm not a big fan of attacking or antagonism. I want people to get along. The reason I can be firm is because that's where I am, that's

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK I believe that right now this forum does not respect his name. Currently the forum is not a place where people can discus about audiogames. This place has became a place where people bash and snap at each other because they're extremely

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK So I guess there's not a whole lot left for me to say, but I'll give a few pieces of context.I locked that topic and issued the warning less than twenty minutes after dealing with the whole Mason mess. I had almost a full twenty-four hours

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @cartertemm, While I take on board the  point about the emotional content of dialogue rather than the bare bones speech, at the same time, things do seem to been growing generally worse across the net. Extremes of opinion, rumour mongering

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @cartertemm, While I take on board the  about the emotional content of dialogue rather than the bare bones speech, at the same time, things do seem to been growing generally worse across the net. Extremes of opinion, rumour mongering, heck

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK cartertemm wrote:I humbly believe the culprit to be lack of physical contact as opposed to some worldly situation,That too, but don't forget you still had that problem not more than a decade ago, but blogging was actually common, people

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK cartertemm wrote:I humbly believe the culprit to be lack of physical contact as opposed to some worldly situation,That too, but don't forget you still had that problem not more than a decade ago, but blogging was actually common, people

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Dark, I humbly believe the culprit to be lack of physical contact as opposed to some worldly situation, assuming I'm understanding your question correctly. Subconsciously we're used to obtaining information by means of sensory stimuli (tone

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK 10 bucks says it's probably a combination of the mostly accusing media, short-form social media that discourages actual thought-out posts, and an increasingly hypersensitive culture. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/419806/#p419806

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK @ironcross thumbs up for the admission in the last post. I saw this topic and my first thought was "yee gods here we go again!" It takes a lot to admit when one is not exactly doing the right thing,  as I said in This topic that is

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK You know what it is, and I figured it out. I lose sight about how it impacts real people. It turns into this UFC like thing, except I can manipulate it to make it go my way, and that's fun. I can spin it so many different ways, and watching

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Yeah, I'm agreeing with Jayde and Carter, 100%, here. If I hadn't seen this thread first, my reaction to the original would have been "are you drunk?" Like, I might expect that from some newb or habitual envelope-pusher (pushing it

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK And here's proof of the general epidemic of various groups of people dicking over other new developers within the past year and a half or there abouts.round 1, concerning the code7's delayed accessibility launch that would've been apparent

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Ironcross, the one previously vocal in the topic calling for mod reform for precisely this issue alone among other things, namely, no more bans on a whim based on flaky evidence or communal beef with that person, is now basically trying

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK CarterTemm, you made quite a good point in this. Finally a moderator who can tell the things without letting his personal emotions to ruin it. Because sadly, one of the staff members likes just closing the topics and every opinion

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Ironcross32 wrote:I'm interested where this is going to go, I'm like loving it and I'm in my element right now and you're ruining it for me."Wait... I'm now curious, why, and how, can someone (in this case, you) be in their element

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Okay, so you lose out on a potentially interesting game because of Mason's tendancies as a dev. Big deal, you'll be okay. I get that money is a different story, but honestly, I would say by this point hundreds of posts on this forum have

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK this popcorn is great. anyone want some? making extra. URL: https://forum.audiogames.net/post/419655/#p419655 -- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK I don't doubt for a second that the moment he decides to release scrolling battles 23.2.164, we'll have a myriad of displeased customers publicly refusing to pay, or at least voicing concerns. Which is totally fine. Just as long as it doesn't

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Well I'm not fond of letting him just be how he is and people not knowing may have got screwed by buying into his games. OK, so no, we can't expect a game to be up forever and a day, that's not realistic; but what should be expected

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK

Re: Gathering Community Consensus is Now Not OK Thanks Xoren, thumbs up. You managed to put it better than I would've. I was actually AFK for a bit so your post saved me a bit of time. It's also worth saying, he was warned today in response. Don't get us wrong, we understand and in many

  1   2   >