1.22.6.2 was done BEFORE 1.0 went out the door, so I didn't break any 1.0
code.
(Besides, the ParameterDesc constructor shouldn't be considered a public
API.)
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED
?)
In time, perhaps, the old file can be eliminated.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
James M
Sounds to me like you should be using a handler to add a header to the soap
message, not mucking with the description of the operation.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED
done!
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Sandholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/31/2002 04:46:06 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:various patches that needs to be committed for a release
Hi,
sorry to bug you guys again but my commit rights
AXIS doesn't support dime bindings in WSDL yet.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Walter Franzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]@bci.it on 10/29/2002 07:16:06 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[Walter Franzini [EMAIL PROTECTED
to enforce good programming style. If we disagree with it we should
go to the spec folks. But we MUST implement explicit headers! Otherwise
we cease to comply with various specs out there.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/08/2002 10:50:52 PM
Please respond
H... What happened to our process? There was no vote for this.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2002 10:49:27 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Axis-Dev (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Merge of i4 stuff
I4 is now
+1!
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2002 07:33:07 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[VOTE] axis 1.0 release
This should just be a formallity at this point.
We've been executing under the approved
+1
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2002 09:18:20 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[VOTE] Merge explicitHeaderWork into HEAD
Please VOTE, Subject says it allMerge explicitHeaderWork into HEAD
into this work
in the first place).
The 'proper' programming practice is to use implicit headers, but I have no
idea how to correlate implicit headers defined in WSDL to runtime handlers.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2002 09:52:01 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL
Of course, Sam! We haven't committed anything that breaks our build.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2002 09:25:24 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Merge explicitHeaderWork into HEAD
Davanum
Whoa! You will merge interop4 to HEAD!?!?! I'll veto that right now. It
doesn't pass functional-tests! We NEED to keep the head branch clean.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/07/2002 09:27:39 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL
Wow. Lots of questions.
Let me make some comments, then I'll
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
St-Germain, Sylvain [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/03/2002 11:20:54
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: soap:header support
Russell,
I have been
some comments to your questions inline in the message below...
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sylvain wrote:
...snip...
- I did not use handlers to handle headers, can you achieve persistence
of
headers between calls when using handlers? ( my implementation caches
the
header objects
. But if folks want me to rip it out, I'll understand. The rest of
the header stuff I DO want to put into a branch, and I won't commit it
until I figure out what I'm doing wrong.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/02/2002 01:21:30 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
which:
1. turns off the UnsupportedException and deals with the new bindings.
2. only generates the SEI and types.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/01/2002 03:50:06 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [axis
Thanks, dims. You fixed it JUST as I hit the problem.
Depending on how long this site is down, perhaps we should vote to add this
test patch to the 1.0 branch so Sam can actually get a build?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/01/2002 07:43:11 AM
Please respond
the TCK when we've been saying all along that AXIS is a JAX-RPC
implementation.
(By the way, Sam, any more thoughts on the lone failure in your automated
TCK run?)
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/27/2002 04:27:01 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL
I just updated my CVS and I don't get any errors on InoutService?wsdl.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/27/2002 04:13:07 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: (Attn:Tom and others
for time).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/30/2002 08:46:20 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
Anthony,
I would think that a different approach would
I don't like lots of extra options on WSDL2Java just for WSIF (particularly
if you'll always use those options in WSIF), so I prefer a new tool. If we
go the route of a new tool, it should be under the WSIF umbrella, not AXIS.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
)?)
- RPCProvider? we have to recognize that parameters may come from headers,
and may have to go back to headers.
- The previous 2 points suggest that ser/deser may have to change
- WSDD must describe which parameters are headers
- ParameterDesc (and others?) must describe which parameters are headers
Russell
I don't have any problems with it, Glyn.
Can you run JUST that test?
cd test/wsdl/_import
ant compile run
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glyn Normington [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/27/2002 03:18:04 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Build break
I thought we had agreed at one point that static methods SHOULD be
excluded. They're certainly not part of traditional beans.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/26/2002 05:10:39 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL
with our new build process?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/27/2002 09:16:21 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: (Attn:Tom and others) EsrTest
Yes, I noticed this and mentioned
Hey folks, should we try undernet today? It looked like Glen and Rich
dropped off the chat, but then Rich told me he and Glen were still talking.
Then Sitze got on and HE was all alone. I dropped off and couldn't get
back on anywhere. Now I'm on undernet but feeling kinda lonely.
Russell
something we can
enforce anyway. All we have to do is hide the skeleton methods.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/27/2002 03:22:54 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: (Attn:Tom and others
+1
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Seibert/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 09/26/2002 08:33:19 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[VOTE]: Removing old files
Okay,
I have been asked to remove the files that the new componentized build
system
Rich guesses that this got added recently by him or Sam in the performance
work.
It doesn't break any tests.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/26/2002 09:00:13 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
I've noticed the commit notes are an hour or two behind today.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Chappell [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/26/2002 12:05:06 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Commit mail - Re: Updated documentation files for JMS
+1
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/24/2002 04:01:19 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[VOTE] Axis 1.0 release plan
BACKGROUND:
Many users have requested a v1.0 so that they can work
H I'd rather you didn't remove this. True, it's not used, but if
we leave the hook in the code, it'll be easy to add extra debug info in the
future. It's not a big fish, I'd much rather we spend time on bugzillas.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/19/2002
I got on DALnet this morning with just a few problems. I got kicked off
once. Tried again and while it took a while I'm in.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/18/2002 07:55:36 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'Axis-Dev (E-mail)' [EMAIL
factory with emitter. Not quite as tidy, as you can see.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: query regarding org.apache.axis.wsdl.toJava.Emitter class
Dear Russell,
In the sample code u have sent, I see the symbolTable
dependencies, but if we DO at some point move WSDL2Java outside, then this will just be one more thing we'll have to put back the way it was.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/deployment
Silence is assent?
I'll check these changes in sometime today.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Rewrite of JavaWriter
My next step in revamping WSDL2Java was rewriting JavaWriter (and consequently all its subclasses
Yay! That did it. If the synchronized clause contains the if(firstCall()) block, I don't believe we need the synchronize block in the firstCall method (in org/apache/axis/client/Stub) .
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Russell
Please ignore.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops! I see Sandeep also send this request to axis-dev. I'm forwarding my response to him in case anyone else cares to see a solution.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded by Russell Butek/Austin/IBM on 06/05/2002 09:05 AM ---
To: Sandeep
We've got to be clear here. We're talking about 2 different things.
1. wire message values
2. generated code
My statement applies to generated code.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [axis] LF vs CR/LF in axis
dims, how did you clean up your environment? I'm failing on the multithread test case now. I worry that we may have a multithreading problem that JDK 1.4 exposes. But if you're not getting it anymore, maybe I need to do some cleanup that I'm not doing.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
Hmmm... sun.tools.javac.Main is deprecated in JDK1.4. This means it'll go away at some point (in a few years, so maybe we don't have to worry about it). When it DOES go away, what will we do, then?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
I think we should let the system do it. Always. If I've coded \n in the WSDL2java code, feel free to slap me around a bit.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: [axis] LF vs CR/LF in axis generated code
Can someone give us
won't -0 yours.)
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/symbolTabl e Utils.java
I pushed the wrong button in IDEA and it sorted the imports
don't know whether .NET would handle
charge0SoapIn.
Here's the corrected .NET-style WSDL: (See attached file: ICredit.wsdl).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 05/30/2002 08:51:04 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:WSDL
The others in AXIS that want to be committers are (did I miss anyone?):
Russell Butek
Richard Scheuerle
James Snell
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Brittenham/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 05/31/2002 03:41:39 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re
/a/jelly/donut
urn:i/think/therefore/i/am
These namespaces have the same problem, they will both map to package i.
Before I dive into this mess, is there anyone who thinks taking file info
into account is a bad idea?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This problem was reported on axis-user, so it's not just my personal brain
teaser. I don't expect we can catch all collisions, but by ignoring the
file section altogether, we allow a lot of collisions that seem relatively
easy to avoid.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL
Ah! Good. That bit of code hasn't really changed. Just some of the
organization of it.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
St-Germain, Sylvain [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/30/2002 08:55:06
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: too many inactive
+1, and I agree with James. As a contribution, this is just like WSIF, so
we should treat it the same.
I would also like to be a committer, if it gets to that point.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
James M Snell/Fresno/IBM@IBMUS on 05/29/2002 01:50:49 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
for some
unknown body to write a spec for us?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/28/2002 04:48:18 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/faults
is meaningful. What is AdminClient hoping to
accomplish here?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard Sitze/Charlotte/IBM@IBMUS on 05/28/2002 06:54:30 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [axis] Transport Name
Let me add more context
These are not bugs. See my comments inline between rjb.../rjb
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jean-Marc Taillant [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/29/2002 08:41:06
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:AXIS BUG ?
Hi all,
I found several
change this web page, perhaps list committers in two columns: active and
inactive.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
James M Snell/Fresno/IBM@IBMUS on 05/28/2002 10:23:56 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: too many inactive committers
+1
. And there is an issue about WS-I wrt the server-side
supporting doc/lit. I'll craft a separate note on that question.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glyn Normington/UK/IBM@IBMGB on 05/22/2002 03:13:21 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Chat
Yay! That means some of the few-and-feeble checks we have in our code can
be removed in time. Greg. Any ETA for the validation?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg Truty/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 05/22/2002 11:39:16 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject
We haven't discussed this, yet. What do folks think?
I think we should try to put a good dent in the bugzilla bugs before we
release beta 3.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Naresh Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/21/2002 08:02:17 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL
Could we three also be added to the WSIF comitters list? Russell Butek,
Richard Scheuerle, Richard Sitze.
Thanks.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/20/2002 02:39:55 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy Hughes/UK/IBM
Done. All of my references to SEI have been changed to INTERFACE.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2002 08:51:39 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl
SEI is Service Endpoint Interface. It's from JAX-RPC. It USED to be SDI -
Service Definition Interface - but they changed it recently (probably
because the Service object now has it's own interface). I'm certainly not
attached to this name. What would you prefer? INTERFACE_NAME?
Russell
Yeah, this is my fault. Sorry about that. I'm working on it.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/10/2002 08:15:58 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Axis-Dev (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Functional tests broken?
I just tried
Anyone else having problems with 'ant junit'? I get this error: (See
attached file: TEST-test.concurrency.PackageTests.xml)
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEST-test.concurrency.PackageTests.xml
Description: Binary data
Thanks. That did it.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/10/2002 09:13:51 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Junit fix - RE: cvs commit:
xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/providers
(for me, at least, this is usually only a few, but I've had as many as
360). My test ignores these exceptions, but the build output is flooded
with them when log.info is used.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/10/2002 10:47:55 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
The AXIS community had decided that what I was doing was overkill. NEW
debug messages weren't going to be NLS'ed. No-one volunteered to clean up
what had been done, though. Looks like Richard's doing it.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/09/2002 01:18:55 PM
Attachments are not yet supported in stubs/skels. You must use the Call
object directly if you want to have attachments. When we DO support
attachments, it'll be based on JAX-RPC, chapter 7
(http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/first/jsr101/index.html).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED
'ant clean' just so we make sure we generate fresh bindings. Now if we had
something like 'ant cleanBindings' that ONLY removed the generated stuff,
then I'd be OK with your suggestion.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/06/2002 06:51:17 PM
Please respond
My comments between rjb/rjb below...
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/07/2002 10:57:46 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Revamped WSDL2Java framework
Comments:
I like the idea
to delete this file from CVS, don't you?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 05/02/2002 05:29:47 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: TestElement.java?
Contact the cvs admin - its a lower-vs-upper case naming problem
Yay! An attachment test! Thanks, Rick.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/01/2002 01:40:47 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/functional FunctionalTests.java
TestAttachmentsSample.java
Glen, could you post a list of the hotels in your area? We'd like to book
our travel very soon.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(unless someone else wants to release it).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. There are some things we've
got, like attachments, that we cannot write tests for BECAUSE
SimpleAxisServer is too simple. I don't have a problem growing SAS a bit,
but if we do a little here, a little there, then it'll soon go beyond
simple.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Gordie [EMAIL PROTECTED
No-one responded to this note. I KNOW we did more than just these two
items since beta 1. I'll add one more:
- various bug fixes.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russell Butek/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 04/23/2002 08:35:41 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
for the community is: any reason to keep the alpha
distribution files around? I haven't read any alpha 3 comments on
axis-user for months.
I say +1 to removing them (and all links to them, of course). Other
opinions?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nothing to do with this list.
PLEASE restrict work to things in this list.
/releaseManagerHat
I am hoping to create a beta2 branch and release a beta 2 release candidate
tomorrow, with the actual release on Monday, but if we can't X all these
items then I won't.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rich, you asked whether Java2WSDL should default to 1.1. That might not be
a bad idea, BUT ... not for beta 2. It sounds like it could have too many
ramifications.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/22/2002 05:01:24 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL
+1 and the stuff remaining in TODO.txt. I'll tally the bugzillas we want
to finish for beta 2 and add them to TODO.txt.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/22/2002 06:14:59 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED
;
-import javax.wsdl.PortType;
+import javax.wsdl.*;
(though you did FIX one wildcard import, too; thanks for that one)
releaseManagerHat
Except for the housecleaning, this one looks suspiciously like something
that should have waited until after beta 2.
/releaseManagerHat
Russell Butek
[EMAIL
.
- ...
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you can reproduce your problem: (See attached file: test.wsdl).
By the way, which version of AXIS are you using? I ran with a build from
April 22.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
St-Germain, Sylvain [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/22/2002 03:57:04
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Axis
)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:409)
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/23/2002 04:07:53 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis
version 0.9 specifies a javax.xml.rpc.encoding.XMLType constants file
that contains stuff almost exactly like ours. So this will change yet
again once we add the javax XMLType file.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/23/2002 05:21:46 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL
this after beta 2.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
St-Germain, Sylvain [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/22/2002 10:19:58
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Axis Dev (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:WSDL2Java - BindingStub not registering all types.
Hi all,
When the -a option
to rename samples/misc to
samples/proxy. misc isn't very descriptive.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you give us some more information? There are a number of TestClient
classes in AXIS: samples/bidbuy, samples/echo, etc. Which one are you
having problems with? And which version of AXIS are you using?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c.borrelli on 04/19/2002 06:39:19 AM
Please
on it. You could end up with an inconsistent symbol table if you
added symbols after this stage.
What exactly are you trying to accomplish here? Why do you have to add
things to the symbol table?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neil Smyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/19/2002 05:04:50 AM
Please
2.
Watch this space in the weeks following beta2 and let me know whether my
changes to the framework help or hinder you.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neil Smyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/19/2002 08:40:51 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Tom, this broke the build. See tests test/wsdl/refattr and test/wsdl/types
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/19/2002 02:31:23 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/toJava
conference room (for a dozen or so), internet access (wireless would really
be nice), and food/drink for breakfast/lunch/snacks?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/17/2002 11:27:34 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Axis IRC chat today at 1PM eastern, noon central, 10AM pacific, etc.
Server : any DALNet server
Channel: #ApacheAxis
Topics:
- Decide when to have the face-to-face.
- discuss beta 2.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
into one).
We shouldn't let this drag out any longer. I'll close the polls COB
Wednesday and let everyone know when/where it'll be on Thursday morning.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_1_ May 22, 23 in Austin (hosted by IBM)
_3_ May 22, 23 in Boston (hosted by Macromedia)
_2_ June 5,6 in San Francisco (hosted by IBM) (some folks will be at the
Interop and XML/WS1 conference this week so they'd be able to combine 2
trips into one).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-toothed comb through the User's Guide.
- I will go through the sample readme's
- I will write the changes-from-beta1-to-beta2 document
- We should grow the FAQ.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
releaseManagerHat
Hey! No new stuff until we get beta 2 out the door!
/releaseManagerHat
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/16/2002 03:26:32 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis
respond is in a weeklong session of meetings, so he's been rather
incommunicado. If you haven't heard from any of us by the middle of next
week, please feel free to slap us again.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fernandez Martinez, Alejandro [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
04/12/2002 04:09:55 AM
Please
we
would probably depend on the schemaLocation, and if it wasn't there, we'd
be free to throw an exception (which I believe we do).
I'm not in the mood to tackle this right now, but I'll add it to our TODO
list.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
been
defined in other locations by other specs and there's a stirring of people
to coalesce all these disparate QNames into one. I wonder whether the
other QNames are final?
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glyn Normington/UK/IBM@IBMGB on 04/11/2002 04:48:26 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED
What would folks think of a beta, version 2, sometime in the next couple
weeks? There have been a number of interface fixes made to bring us in
line with JAX-RPC. The meta-data stuff has progressed considerably.
There's been some messaging work. Plenty of other stuff.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL
.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/10/2002 09:22:45 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Interop tests are failing (Tom ?!)
Weird - this works fine for me...
Anyone else having problems?
(I tried WASP
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
