Hello Lars,
Le 2021-10-18 à 13:15, Lars Eggert via Datatracker a écrit :
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and
Dear BESS,
please disregard this e-mail.
Thank you
-m
Le 2018-02-26 à 4:57, Mach Chen a écrit :
Dear BESS,
This email starts an IPR call on draft-ietf-bess-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib-13, in
preparation to document advancement.
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
ok, let us know when you've updated it, we'll call it for adoption fater
that.
-m
Le 2018-02-13 à 3:50, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) a écrit :
Hi Martin, Stephane:
This is one of the draft in my plate that I needed to update and ask for
a WG call. It has already been implemented by number of
All,
there is support and all authors have reported back on the list
regarding the IPR question so we have a new WG doc.
To the authors, could you please republish as
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-00?
thank you
M
Le 2018-01-11 à 11:11, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group
is covered by this IPR as I couldn’t figure it out by
glancing through it.
Regards,
Ali
On 1/16/18, 1:56 PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" <bess-boun...@ietf.org
on behalf of martin.vigour...@nokia.com> wrote:
WG,
as you can see, an IPR disclosure
WG,
as you can see, an IPR disclosure was made during the IESG review phase
of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay. We'd like to give you the opportunity
to reflect on this and let us know if you see any reason not to proceed
with the standardisation process.
Deadline for voicing opinions is set
WG,
this dates a bit. Yet, if you have any issue with this situation, please
speak up.
Thanks
-m
Message transféré
Sujet : [bess] IPR Disclosure Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd's Statement
about IPR related to draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane
Date : Mon, 20 Nov 2017
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-lin-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-04 [1] as a BESS Working Group Document.
Please state on the list if you support the adoption or not (in both
cases, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 26th of
if the intent was to help people better understand the reasoning behind
the design, is it really best to remove it?
Wouldn't a rephrasing be more appropriate?
-m
Le 2017-12-15 à 19:21, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) a écrit :
Hi Thomas,
On 12/15/17, 8:42 AM, "BESS on behalf of Thomas Morin"
Glenn, Tsuno,
many many thanks for bringing this to conclusion!
Mach, can you check the shepherd write-up and let me know when we are
good to go.
Thanks
-m
Le 2017-12-14 à 14:15, Glenn Mansfield Keeni a écrit :
Dear Tsuno,
Thank you for the good work.
All the issues are addressed. I
thomas.mo...@orange.com>) wrote:
All,
Martin Vigoureux, 2017-12-05 11:34:
Alvaro: [...]
What about Geneve (draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve)? The nvo3 WG is
focusing on
Geneve as the Standard encapsulation, but this document doesn’t
even mention it.
Indeed. But The decision by NVO3 to work on Geneve is f
Hello Alvaro,
thanks for your review.
Please see in-line regarding the two first points.
-m
Le 04/12/2017 à 22:49, Alvaro Retana a écrit :
Dear Authors:
I just finished reading this document (finally!). I have a some
comments (see below) which I think should be easy to address.
I also have
Thomas,
we really had great times together! Thanks for that. Thanks for your
dedication and I wish you all the best.
Stéphane, welcome!
-m
Le 01/12/2017 à 17:48, thomas.mo...@orange.com a écrit :
Alvaro Retana, 2017-12-01 11:16:
I am sad to report that Thomas Morin has decided not to
Martin Vigoureux has requested publication of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-09 as Proposed Standard on behalf of
the BESS working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement
Presenters, WG,
we have posted the agenda for BESS in Singapore.
Please have a look at it:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/agenda/bess/
Please start sending your presentation material now.
Deadline is Sunday 12th of November, 23:59 local time.
Please design your presentation in order
WG,
we have a new WG Document.
Authors could you republish as draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-00
thank you
Le 25/09/2017 à 11:42, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway-05 [1] as a BESS Working
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Singapore.
The IETF agenda (still preliminary) is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/agenda.html
The BESS WG session (2h) is scheduled on
Friday, November 17th, 2017 / Morning session I / 09:30-11:30 (local time)
Authors, WG,
this document is adopted.
Please republish as draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-00
-m
Le 12/09/2017 à 09:35, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-snr-bess-evpn-na-flags-07 [1] as a Working Group Document.
Please
I meant the 9th of October, sorry.
Le 25/09/2017 à 11:42, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-drake-bess-datacenter-gateway-05 [1] as a BESS Working Group
Document.
Please state on the list if you support the adoption
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-snr-bess-evpn-na-flags-07 [1] as a Working Group Document.
Please state on the list if you support the adoption or not (in both
cases, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 26th of September*.
@att.com>, George Swallow <swallow.i...@gmail.com>, Alia Atlas
<akat...@gmail.com>, Martin Vigoureux
<martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com>, Loa Andersson <l...@pi.nu>, Thomas
Morin <thomas.mo...@orange.com>, Nicolai Leymann <n.leym...@telekom.de>
Cop
Presenters, WG,
we have posted the agenda for BESS in Prague.
Please have a look at it:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/bess/
Please start sending you presentation material now.
Strict deadline is Wednesday 19th of July, 23:59 local time. Anything
received after that will
80% of the requests are for 00, including your 3 Ali :-)
-m
Le 04/07/2017 à 00:34, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) a écrit :
I presume based on actions taken before in such situations, new works will
be given preference over older drafts.
Regards,
Ali
On 7/3/17, 3:24 PM, "Martin Vigo
PM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
<bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of martin.vigour...@nokia.com> wrote:
WG,
we've had (much) more requests than we can accommodate for.
Many of them came in the last two days.
Please give us a bit of time to prioritize and publish an ag
WG,
we've had (much) more requests than we can accommodate for.
Many of them came in the last two days.
Please give us a bit of time to prioritize and publish an agenda.
Not every slot request will be granted.
-m
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Prague.
The IETF agenda (still preliminary) is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda.html
The BESS WG session (2h) is scheduled on
Thursday, July 20, 2017 / Afternoon session II / 15:50-17:50 (local time)
Please
WG,
the WG LC has ended and we have support to move forward.
I'll shepherd the document.
-m
Le 06/06/2017 à 16:11, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready
for a final
WG, Authors/Contributors, this is a reminder.
Thank you
-m
Le 06/06/2017 à 16:11, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready
for a final working group review.
Please
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-02 [1] which is considered mature and ready
for a final working group review.
¤ Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and send your comments to the list, no
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-usage-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready
for a final working group review.
Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and send your comments to the list, no later
WG,
there is a clear renewed support for this document, so we'll continue as
normal.
Thank you.
M
Le 13/04/2017 à 20:04, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
WG
Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for
comment specifically to let people
WG
Given the IPR disclosed [1] against
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane, we are starting a call for
comment specifically to let people express a revised opinion on how
draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane should be pursued in BESS.
This call for comment is open until the 5th of May
?
Thank you
M
Le 06/03/2017 à 12:55, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-04 [1] as a Working Group Document.
Please state on the list if you support the adoption or not (in both
cases, please
Presenters, WG,
we have posted the agenda for BESS in Chicago.
Please have a look at it:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/agenda/agenda-98-bess-00
Please note that BESS in on Monday at 9 am.
We are thus setting a *very strict deadline Sunday 11:59 pm local time*
for receiving the
Authors,
there has been a number of comments on this draft during WG LC.
Please make sure you give an answer regarding each, and then update the
draft if needed.
Thank you
M
Le 13/02/2017 à 23:07, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call
Authors,
there has been a number of comments on this draft during WG LC.
Please make sure you give an answer regarding each, and then update the
draft if needed.
Thank you
M
Le 13/02/2017 à 23:07, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call
All,
we now have all the IPR related answers.
We are good to go. I'll shepherd the document.
-m
Le 24/02/2017 à 10:28, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
All,
there is good support for this document, but we are missing few answers
to the IPR question.
As soon as they come in we'll move towards
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week call for adoption on
draft-mackie-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-04 [1] as a Working Group Document.
Please state on the list if you support the adoption or not (in both
cases, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 19th of
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Chicago.
The IETF agenda is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda.html
The BESS WG session (2h) is scheduled on
Monday, March 27, 2017 / Morning session I / 9:00-11:30 (local time)
Please send us your request for a
All,
there is good support for this document, but we are missing few answers
to the IPR question.
As soon as they come in we'll move towards publication.
Thanks
-m
Le 06/02/2017 à 14:07, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-03 [1] which is considered
mature and ready for a final working group review.
Note that this call is longer than usual because we are pushing two
correlated documents together.
WG,
we haven't heard any opposition to proceeding with this early allocation.
We will thus move forward.
-m
Le 31/01/2017 à 11:55, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Dear WG,
we have received early allocation requests from the authors of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement and
draft-ietf-bess
/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw
-m
Le 06/02/2017 à 14:07, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04 [1] which is considered mature and
ready for a final working group review.
Please read
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-04 [1] which is considered mature and
ready for a final working group review.
Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and send your comments to the list, no
Dear WG,
we have received early allocation requests from the authors of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement and
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates: (see details below).
Please let us know if you are aware of any code-point conflict, or
if you have issues with the WG moving
sent to list as admin. message had bounced.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Jorge,
Sorry for the delay, I will be addressing the comments below in the next rev,
and will be clarifying the DF election too.
The DF election between the service edge nodes will follow RFC 7432 using the
per ES Ethernet
sent to list as admin. message had bounced.
--- Begin Message ---
Sami,
I looked at your Service Edge Gateway draft, and since my comments/questions
were not addressed in rev 03, I’m resending our last exchange.
Besides the comments below (please see the thread from earlier this year), the
WG,
we have now all the IPR answers and support for adopting the document.
Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-00
Thank you
-m
Le 16/08/2016 14:37, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Seoul.
The IETF agenda is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda.html
Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda.
The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on
Monday, 14th of November, Afternoon session
on the way forward for this
document.
target deadline: 25th of October 2016
Thank you
-m
Le 16/08/2016 14:37, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group
Document.
Please
WG,
we have recently LCed draft-ietf-bess-virtual-subnet-fib-reduction and
there was sufficient support to move forward. However we haven't
received any input on existing implementations.
As per [1] we are thus asking the WG whether we should nevertheless move
this to IESG or wait until
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-zzhang-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-03 [1] as a Working Group
Document.
Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 30th of
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
WG, just to clarify, this is not a DT as commonly understood but a group
of authors.
Le 09/07/2016 14:37, Guofeng a écrit :
Hi,
We have setup a joint MVPN design team and worked on a MVPN YANG draft,
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-liu-bess-mvpn-yang-01.txt
MVPN relates to areas such as
Hello,
now that the agenda has been posted, please start sending your
presentation material to Thomas and I.
Please do so before Sunday the 17th of July, 23h59 local time.
Thank you
M
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
Dear WG,
we have received an early allocation request from the authors of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-optimized-ir (see details below).
Please let us know if you are aware of any code-point conflict, or
about any question regarding this allocation.
We envisage to proceed with the request on the 27th
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Berlin.
The IETF agenda is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/agenda.html
Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda.
The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on
Thursday, 21st of July, Afternoon session I
All,
we have a new WG Document.
Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-00
Thank you
-m
Le 15/06/2016 10:38, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
All,
as a heads-up an IPR disclosure has been made recently:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2807/
I'll give this call one more week
All,
as a heads-up an IPR disclosure has been made recently:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2807/
I'll give this call one more week.
For those who haven't expressed their opinion, please do so.
-m
Le 30/05/2016 17:55, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts
and idr-tunnel-encap as Informative.
Regards,
Ali
On 6/7/16, 1:08 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
<bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of martin.vigour...@nokia.com> wrote:
Hi,
We are fine with keeping 5512 as the Normative reference for now.
We would think it wise if the
Hi,
We are fine with keeping 5512 as the Normative reference for now.
We would think it wise if the editors can add an Informative reference
to draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps (with some text indicating that both
specs provide the required support for the procedures).
The ideal situation would be
the draft to publication (the draft alias is
incomplete/incorrect).
And please get back to the WG with a synthesis of the changes brought to
the draft.
-m
Le 24/05/2016 10:05, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
WG, Authors,
we are past the deadline for this WG LC.
I am still waiting for statements from
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-dolganow-bess-mvpn-expl-track-02 [1] as a Working Group Document.
Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 13th of June*.
We are
page and make sure the e-mail addresses are all correct.
Beyond that we are ready to go as we have knowledge of implementations.
Thank you
-m
Le 05/05/2016 12:54, EXT Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
Please read carefully, this e-mail contains new elements compared to
other WG LCs
Hello Working Group,
Please read carefully, this e-mail contains new elements compared to
other WG LCs.
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpws-03 [1].
¤ Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and send your comments to the
All,
the agenda for the BESS WG session is available here:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-bess
Speakers, please send your slides no later than Sunday the 3rd of April,
midnight (local time).
Thanks
m
___
BESS mailing list
All,
the scheduling of our session has been confirmed
Thursday, 7th of April, Afternoon session I 14:00-16:00 (local time)
Please send your requests for slots if you still have some.
Thanks
-m
Le 07/03/2016 13:18, EXT Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG
submitted to the IETF. An IPR
statement has now been submitted and is in progress. This was an
inadvertent oversight, and we apologize for the late disclosure.
Regards,
-Dhananjaya
On 2/22/16, 8:58 AM, "BESS on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
<bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of martin.vigour
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Buenos Aires.
The IETF agenda is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/95/agenda.html
Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda.
The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on
Thursday, 7th of April, Afternoon
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-fm-bess-service-chaining-02 [1] as a working group Document.
Please state on the list if you support adoption or not (in both cases,
please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until *the 7th of March*.
Note that
WG,
there is good support for the document and all authors have declared
that they are not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft.
So we have a new WG document
Authors please resubmit as
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-00
thank you
-m
Le 11/01/2016 10:07, Martin Vigoureux a écrit
Working Group,
Thomas and I have reviewed the comments expressed on the list since
our first proposal on the subject.
We consider that there is consensus to put in place the following (which
is the amended proposal):
At the same time we will issue a Working Group Last Call, we will ask
for
All,
the WG LC deadline is now behind us.
I have only seen support for this document.
We will thus proceed with submitting it to IESG.
-m
Le 05/01/2016 15:48, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags-01 [1] which
Sorry, the deadline is the 19th, not the 12th.
Thx
-m
Le 05/01/2016 15:48, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-pta-flags-01 [1] which is considered mature and ready
for a final working group review.
Please read
WG,
we have reviewed the different comments posted on the list in response
to our initial proposal.
After thinking further about that, we'd like to propose the following as
a way forward:
At the same time we issue a Working Group Last Call we would ask for
knowledge of existing
WG,
we are reiterating the request below; we would highly appreciate reviews
from the WG before moving forward.
Thank you
M
Le 21/11/2015 01:29, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
WG
This WG LC has ended some time ago but without any comment on the draft.
It might not have any flaw but I'd like
WG,
we have received all feedbacks regarding IPR on that draft and there is
support to adopt it.
Authors, please resubmit it as draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-00
Thank you
Martin
Le 02/10/2015 12:29, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll
results of
the poll into consideration during WG LC to see if there’s a consensus
to send it to the IESG. There could be a draft that everyone agrees is
really important to get published, but for whatever reason hasn’t yet
been implemented.
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Martin Vigoureux
<m
Hello Kireeti,
thanks for your inputs.
I understand the challenge that "release x.y @shipping date d" might
pose. What we want, is to go beyond the "I am aware of an
implementation" type of response. It might currently be sufficient with
regards to the shepherd write-up question, but won't be
ant during the I-D life cycle within the WG. But I guess
this is a broader discussion.
Adrian (still thinking about this)
-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
Sent: 24 November 2015 23:17
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Introdu
cussion at the meeting is informative, but is not
the basis for a WG decision.
I am also slightly concerned that the working group is creating a
procedural bar (one that does seem reasonable to me) without buyin
from the larger community.
Yours,
Joel
On 11/24/15 6:16 PM,
Hi Adrian,
indeed, minutes should have been available sooner. situation has been
corrected.
The basic motivation for this is simply to avoid (over)loading the iesg
with documents that have no (and could possibly never have an)
implementation. Or, at least, if every spec gets implemented, it
Lucy,
there is no such thing as voting in IETF WGs
And I haven't seen anything like voting as part of this discussion.
Thank you
Martin
Le 20/11/2015 20:57, Lucy yong a écrit :
IMHO: voting on this thread does not make a sense. Both solutions will work and
scales.
Lucy
-Original
solution here does not make
a sense. There is no need for the two solutions interwork.
Regards,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 2:13 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-hao-bess-inter
WG
This WG LC has ended some time ago but without any comment on the draft.
It might not have any flaw but I'd like to have the evidence that the
document has been reviewed.
Please take a moment to read it and get back to this list to share your
views.
Thanks
-m
Le 13/10/2015 15:40, Martin
Hello,
Please send to *both Thomas and I* your presentation material before
Sunday the 1st of November at midnight, local time, at the latest.
Please make sure it is consistent with the time allocated to it in the
agenda:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-bess
Thank you
M
Hi everyone,
You can find our *draft* agenda at:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-bess
Note well that this agenda is subject to change.
Do no hesitate to send us your feedback and comments.
M
___
BESS mailing list
, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs
Hello Working Group,
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-01 [1] which is considered mature and
ready for a final working group review.
Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent
version yet, and send your comments to the list, no
All,
the BESS slot has been confirmed as originally scheduled:
Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon session I 13:00-15:00 (local time)
This is a reminder to send slot requests.
Thank you
Regards
Martin
Le 06/10/2015 12:23, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
All,
it is time we start building
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Yokohama.
The IETF agenda is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/94/agenda.html
Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda.
The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on
Thursday, 5th of November, Afternoon
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-morin-bess-mvpn-fast-failover [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until the *16th of
WG,
please let us know of any implementation (or plan of) you are aware of
for draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-02
Thank you
M
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Former L2VPN WG participants,
it was brought to my attention that you were possibly not aware of IPR
existing against draft-...-spbm-evpn at the times you supported the
document (Adoption: 10/2013; WGLC: 10/2014) even if it had been
disclosed prior to adoption (05/2013).
This could be due
ring if this comes up again we get it right), what
part broke down here?
I made sure we filed the disclosure, is it also my job to make sure it is
announced on the appropriate WG lists?
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@alcatel-lucent.com]
the existence of
an IPR disclosure know to the working group in working group adoption polls,
working group last calls and in other postings . WG members can
then check the disclosure.
Yep, I was wondering if the above happened. Martin confirmed that it did not.
Alissa
On 2015-09-29 18:15, Martin
WG, authors,
the poll has ended and there is enough support to adopt this document.
Authors, please republish as draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-00
Thanks
-m
Le 12/06/2015 17:58, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-keyupate-l2vpn
all,
Prague is in few days now, and BESS is on Monday.
Please send your presentation material before Sunday 7pm, local time at
the latest.
Please make sure it is consistent with the time allocated to it in the
agenda:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/agenda/agenda-93-bess
Thank you
MT
All,
it is time we start building the BESS WG agenda for Prague.
The IETF agenda is available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/93/agenda.html
Please note that it is still a preliminary agenda.
The BESS WG session (2h) is currently scheduled on
Monday, July 20th, Afternoon session II
Hello
this email starts a Working Group Last Call on
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming
which is considered mature and ready for a last working group review.
Please read the document if you haven't read the most recent version
yet, and send your comments to the list,
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
