Re: [bess] Extended to Nov 4th: New Poll for adoption on draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes related to late IPR disclosure

Support. Linda Dunbar -Original Message- From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Morin Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 3:46 AM To: bess Cc: draft-ietf-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefi...@tools.ietf.org; bess ADs; draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefi...@tools.ietf.org

Re: [bess] draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc

Wim, If the draft adds some description to say that the VxLAN header is decapsulated, and the MAC header is terminated. It is the inner IP data frames to be passed to the MPLS IP-VPNs. Will it clear out the confusion? Linda From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henderickx,

Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc

Support, Linda Dunbar From: BESS [bess-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of 顾戎 [gurong_c...@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 17:38 To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bess] Poll for adoption: draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-opt

Re: [bess] new WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05

Support. Linda Dunbar From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>" mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 7:03 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:

[bess] comments and suggestions to draft-rosen-bess-secure-l3vpn-01

nalysis/ Appreciate your comments and suggestions to our gap analysis. Thanks, Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] comments and suggestions to draft-rosen-bess-secure-l3vpn-01

of 100s or 1000s CPEs. Linda From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 3:20 PM To: Robert Raszuk Cc: Ron Bonica ; RTGWG ; Eric Rosen ; bess@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar Subject: Re: [bess] comments and suggestions to draft-rosen-bess-secure-l3vpn-01

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-zzhang-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-label-01

Yes/support Regards, Linda Dunbar From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com<mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:22 PM To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft

[bess] Comparing using the SD-WAN Overlay SAFI specified by draft-dunbar-idr-bgp-sdwan-overlay-ext with the EVPN approach described by draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-00

-WAN edge nodes and RR described by draft-dunbar-idr-bgp-sdwan-overlay-ext is necessary. Any thoughts? Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Comparing using the SD-WAN Overlay SAFI specified by draft-dunbar-idr-bgp-sdwan-overlay-ext with the EVPN approach described by draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-00

l take years to mature. 4. Registry of Data on AWS etc... [Linda] sure if AWS is interested in participating to make the needed changes. More work is needed to make AWS Data registry to communicate our existing BGP? Linda From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net] Sent: Sunday, Novembe

Re: [bess] Comparing using the SD-WAN Overlay SAFI specified by draft-dunbar-idr-bgp-sdwan-overlay-ext with the EVPN approach described by draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-00

arrival. There is no routes to be associated with the SD-WAN Tunnel. How do you address those issues? Linda From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 12:04 PM To: Linda Dunbar ; i...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Comparing using the SD

[bess] what are the problems to anticipate with new SD-WAN SAFI specified by draft-dunbar-idr-bgp-sdwan-overlay-ext ?

AN SAFI specified by draft-dunbar-idr-bgp-sdwan-overlay-ext ? Thank you Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] Last call comment to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05

on PE". Thank you. Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] Comments to draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-00

ts (facing untrusted domain) with the IPsec tunnels. Actually, even for other granularity (such as Per tenant, Per Subnet, or per IP) IPsec tunnels, it is necessary to associate with the WAN ports as well because the trusted domain doesn't need IPsec SA. Li

[bess] Are the IPsec Policy-list and DH-group-list per IPsec tunnel ? draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-00

nnel with PE-B, tenant based IPsec tunnel with PE-C, WAN port based IPsec with PE-D, does PE-A have different DH-group-list for different IPsec tunnels? Thanks, Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:48 AM To: 'draft-sajassi-bess-secure-e...@ietf.org' ; bess@ietf.org Cc:

[bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready with comments I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

Support. Linda Dunbar On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:53 AM mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> wrote: This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02 [1] Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group lis

Re: [bess] [Idr] Issue 1: IPSEC related drafts

Many thanks to Sue for putting those drafts together. Very good summary. Adding Yoav to the discussion. draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04 is going through WGLC now. draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection specifies a way for nodes to receive IPsec policies from Controller(s),

Re: [bess] [Idr] Can we have the IPSEC related drafts discussion before Friday during IETF 105?

Many Thanks to IDR chairs. Wed 13:30-15:30 works for me. Linda -Original Message- From: Paul Wouters Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2019 7:38 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: Yoav Nir ; i...@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] Can we have the IPSEC related drafts discussion

[bess] Can we have the IPSEC related drafts discussion before Friday during IETF 105?

Hope we can have a face to face meeting discussing IPSEC related drafts in IETF105. I have hard conflict for Friday July 26. Can we have the discussion anytime before Friday during IETF105? Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar From: Idr On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:14

Re: [bess] Slot requests for BESS WG session - IETF 105 - Montreal

Here is the draft for SDWAN scenarios and the applicability of BGP for each of those scenarios. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ As stated in earlier email, we need a 10-minutes slot for BESS session. Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2019 12

Re: [bess] Slot requests for BESS WG session - IETF 105 - Montreal

Can we have a 10-minutes slot to present SDWAN scenarios and the applicability of BGP for each of those scenarios? The draft will be uploaded before cutoff date. Thanks, Linda Dunbar From: BESS On Behalf Of Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 2:08 PM To: bess@ietf.org

[bess] Any protocols suitable for Application Flow Based Segmentation in draft-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-3?

protocol that can handle the above scenario described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] Any protocols suitable for Application Flow Based Segmentation in draft-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-3?

* 18? “So number of overlay pipes to be created in corresponding SDWAN data planes is 9 in each direction just over those *two* end points. 18 if you consider bidirectional traffic” Linda From: Robert Raszuk Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 6:54 PM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [bess] Any protocols suitable for Application Flow Based Segmentation in draft-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-3?

: Robert Raszuk Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2019 3:15 PM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Any protocols suitable for Application Flow Based Segmentation in draft-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-3? Linda, The key message here is that in properly designed SDWAN your limit is capped

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-litkowski-bess-rfc5549revision-00

I support the WG Adoption of this draft. Regards, Linda Dunbar 发件人: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 发送时间: 2019年11月27日 20:37 收件人: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> 抄送: bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org> 主题: [bess] WG Adoption

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-sajassi-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop

Support, Linda Dunbar From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com<mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com>" mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com>> Date: Monday, October 28, 2019 at 3:10 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-02

of asking ingress node to encapsulate the policy in the packet header? Which has the drawback of extra header bits in packets. Linda Dunbar From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>> Date: Friday, September 27, 2019 at 4:00 AM To: "draft-dawra-bess-s

[bess] Questions to draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-02

E are SR unaware plain IP forwarding nodes”. Thanks, Linda From: Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2019 3:50 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: draft-dawra-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-02 Linda, SRv6

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-04

I support the WG adoption of draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-04 Linda Dunbar On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:42 AM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for > draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-04 [1] . > > > > Ple

[bess] solicit feedback on draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage description of using BGP UPDATE messages to achieve SD-WAN Application Based Segmentation

ath Attribute: * Any node to C-PE2 Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

[bess] question to draft-brissette-bess-evpn-mh-pa-04

the acronym? I support the WG adoption, with the hope that the authors will address the questions above. Cheers, Linda Dunbar From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>> Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 6:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>

Re: [bess] Taking slot requests for interim meeting - Last week of April

Mankamana, Can we have 15 minutes for the following two drafts? We have requested WGLC. Hope BESS WG can review the drafts and provide comments. draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-09 draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-05 Thank you. Linda Dunbar From: BESS On Behalf

[bess] Request BESS WG adoption for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

DWAN projects, such as MEF, BBF, ONUG etc. So that they don't have to re-invent the wheel. Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] [Idr] FW: Is there any problem of using Private AS as "Identifier" to differentiate SD-WAN Segmentation for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage?

Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 6:45 PM To: Linda Dunbar ; i...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] FW: Is there any problem of using Private AS as "Identifier" to differentiate SD-WAN Segmentation for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage? Hi Linda, It seems that a label m

[bess] Request for WG Adoption for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-05

/draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 11:55 PM To: Huaimo Chen ; i...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Idr] FW: Is there any problem of using Private AS as "Identifier" to differentiate SD-WAN Se

[bess] Seeking feedback of draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi using SDWAN SAFI to encode SDWAN Instance ID in the NLRI

~ ~ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ NLRI with SDWAN Instance ID. Greatly appreciate any comments or other suggestions. Thank you, Linda Dunbar From: Huaimo Chen

Re: [bess] [Idr] Seeking feedback of draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi using SDWAN SAFI to encode SDWAN Instance ID in the NLRI

. But SDWAN Instance ID is not carried by the Data Packets. Is it correct? Thank you. Linda From: Robert Raszuk Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 2:28 PM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: Huaimo Chen ; i...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] Seeking feedback of draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi using SDWAN

Re: [bess] [Idr] Seeking feedback of draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi using SDWAN SAFI to encode SDWAN Instance ID in the NLRI

label carried by the data packets . Thank you. Linda Dunbar From: Robert Raszuk Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 3:32 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: Huaimo Chen ; i...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] Seeking feedback of draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi using SDWAN SAFI to encode SDWAN

Re: [bess] Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

Message- From: Joel M. Halpern Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 6:35 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; Linda Dunbar ; 'Najem, Basil' ; bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage So A

Re: [bess] Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

August 3, 2020 11:52 AM To: Linda Dunbar ; adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Najem, Basil' ; bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage The way you are wording that third bullet,

Re: [bess] Presentation slot request for IETF 108

We would like 10 minutes to give an update to the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ Thank you. Linda Dunbar From: BESS On Behalf Of Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 1:01 PM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess

Re: [bess] RE BGP Usage for SDWAN Overlay Networks Adoption

Basil, Thank you very much for the comments. Here are the proposed resolution to your suggestion: Linda Dunbar From: Najem, Basil Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 5:15 PM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE BGP Usage

Re: [bess] Request BESS WG adoption for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

Matthew and Stephane It has been almost 2 months since our presentation at the IETF107 virtual meeting and our request for WG adoption. Can you let us know what else we need to do to move forward to the WG Adoption call? Thank you very much. Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Wednesday, April 29

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

Support the WG adoption. I am not aware of any IPR associated with the draft. Linda Dunbar From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:14 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Hello

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-02

Support the WGLC. I think the draft is ready to move to IESG. Linda Dunbar -- Forwarded message - From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Date: Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:55 AM Subject: WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-02 To: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req

Re: [bess] Closing on Stephane's open issue with draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway

filtering rule to import any route that carries a route target with the same SR domain identifier that the GW itself uses” How about routes associated to a VPN and to a SR domain? The VPN and the SR might use different RTs. Can you have two different Route Target in one advertisement? Thank you Linda

[bess] Questions about the ESP-Transport and ESP-in-UDP transport in SECURE-EVPN

Ali, Just follow up with my question in the BESS WG session. Your draft introduced two Tunnel Types in 5.1: ESP-Transport and ESP-in-UDP Transport as below. When standard IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) is used (without outer UDP header) for encryption of NVO packets, it is used in

Re: [bess] Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

raft. I will attend the APN side meeting on Thurs to understand more. Linda Dunbar -Original Message- From: Najem, Basil Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 7:10 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Thought about "Appli

Re: [bess] Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

Dunbar From: Najem, Basil Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 9:46 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Thought about "Application Routing" in draft-dunbar-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage Hi Adrian; Given the context in th

Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-05

Support for the publication. Linda Dunbar From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:16 AM To: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-srv6-servi...@ietf.org>; bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess

[bess] Is there any objection to adopting the MEF's SDWAN service definition for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage?

g. packets delay, packet loos, jitter) to provide better application performance by choosing the right underlay that meets or exceeds the specified criteria. Any opinion? Thanks, Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailma

[bess] draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage needs a new Tunnel-Type = SDWAN-Hybrid, Is it necessary to discuss the new Tunnel-Type in IDR WG?

to be discussed in IDR WG to get one? What is the right procedure? Your guidance is greatly appreciated. Thank you very much. Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] IETF 109, call for slots

Hi Mankamana, We need 10 mins slot to present the update to : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ Thanks, Linda Dunbar On Oct 23, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) mailto:mankamis=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: All, Final agenda for IE

Re: [bess] Mail regarding draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

Haibo, Thank you very much for the suggestion. How about using "Color Extended Community"? i.e. Client UPDATE recursive to the node address with "Color Extended Community" attached. And the UPDATE for the Node describes the detailed IPsec attributes with the matching Color Extended Community

[bess] Is there any issue with the changes to the Packet Walk-Through for BGP SDWAN usage ?

ports. When a C-PE receives an encrypted packet from its WAN port, it decrypted the packet and forward the inner packet to the client port based on the inner packet's destination address. Any issues with this description? Thanks, Linda Dunbar ___ BESS

Re: [bess] Is there any issue with the changes to the Packet Walk-Through for BGP SDWAN usage ?

to EVI mapping have to be configured in the same way as EVPN described in RFC8388. " The CNx in Figure 2 represents a Client Network. Some CN can be multi-homed to two PEs (which is not shown in the figure for -02 revision, will be updated for -03 revision). Linda Dunbar From: Najem, Ba

Re: [bess] About draft-wang-bess-l3-accessible-evpn

one VRF on each PE", don't you need to configure the VRFs for all Customer A, B, C on each PE? Linda Dunbar On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:25 AM Wei Wang mailto:weiwan...@foxmail.com>> wrote: Hi Gyan, Sergey, Patrice and Jorge, In fact, we are considering the following scenario: [cid:image00

[bess] Is there any issue of using the ID of a pre-established IPsec SA in the BGP UDPATE for SDWAN Edge nodes instead of detailed IPsec SA attributes ?

to be prepend right before the IPsec-SA-ID Sub-TLV. Using IPsec-SA-ID Sub-TLV not only greatly reduces the size of BGP UPDATE messages, but also allows the pairwise IPsec rekeying process to be performed independently. Do people see any issues of this proposed encoding? Thank you very much. Linda

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-mishra-bess-deployment-guide-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-03

additional features enabled by this draft. Is it PE-CE? The draft did mention the value of applying RFC8950 to PE-CE, but I am not sure if it is the only feature. Can authors clarify? Best regards, Linda Dunbar -- Forwarded message - From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) mailto:mat

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR Poll for draft-mishra-bess-deployment-guide-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-03

l use case and OPEX savings of being able to leverage the MP-BGP capability exchange usage as a pure transport, allowing both IPv4 and IPv6 to be carried over the same (Border Gateway Protocol) BGP TCP session." Thank you. Linda From: Gyan Mishra Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 2:59 PM To: Linda

Re: [bess] Please send request to take slot in IETF 110

Mankamana, and BESS chair, Can we have 10 minutes slot to go through the major changes in the latest revision of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/? Primarily on the Packet Walk Through which we didn’t cover at IETF 109. Linda From: BESS On Behalf Of Mankamana

Re: [bess] Is there any issue with the changes to the Packet Walk-Through for BGP SDWAN usage ?

Basil, Thank you very much for the suggestion. Has incorporated your comments to the 03 version. Linda From: Najem, Basil Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 6:48 PM To: Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: Is there any issue with the changes to the Packet Walk-Through for BGP SDWAN usage

[bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04

. It is very useful for the industry. Thank you, Linda Dunbar ___ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Re: [bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04

BESS WG Chair, We haven't heard any feedback to this request. So send it again. If there is anything you want us to do before the WGLC, please advise. Thank you. Linda Dunbar From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 1:44 PM To: bess-cha...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: WGLC

Re: [bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04

Matthew and Stephane, Can you please give a feedback on how to move forward? Thank you Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 10:46 AM To: bess-cha...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04 Matthew and Stephane, Can you

Re: [bess] qquestion om draft-mpmz-bess-mup-saf at the bess meeting at IETF 113

? Thank you very much. Linda -Original Message- From: Loa Andersson Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2022 12:58 AM To: draft-mpmz-bess-mup-s...@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar ; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com Cc: BESS Subject: qquestion om draft-mpmz-bess-mup-saf at the bess meeting at IETF 113 Authors

Re: [bess] qquestion om draft-mpmz-bess-mup-saf at the bess meeting at IETF 113

(if the addresses were managed by the UPF before). Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only -Original Message- From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 12:47 PM To: Loa Andersson ; draft-mpmz-bess-mup-s...@ietf.org; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com Cc: BESS Subject: RE: qquestion om

Re: [bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-04

Matthew and Stephane, Can you give some guidance on how to move the draft to WGLC? Is there anything authors can do? It has been 3 months since we sent the WGLC request. Thank you very much, Linda Dunbar From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 1:44 PM To: bess-cha...@ietf.org Cc

Re: [bess] qquestion om draft-mpmz-bess-mup-saf at the bess meeting at IETF 113

To: Linda Dunbar ; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Loa Andersson ; draft-mpmz-bess-mup-s...@ietf.org; wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com Cc: BESS Subject: Re: qquestion om draft-mpmz-bess-mup-saf at the bess meeting at IETF 113 Hi Linda, To be clear - We are not replacing the UPF. The UPF still

[bess] Can you please check the latest revision has addressed all your comments? RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14

on the IETF Data Tracker? Thank you very much, Linda _ From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 12:05 PM To: Stephen Farrell ; sec...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Secdir

Re: [bess] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14

Dan and Lars, Please see the resolutions to your comments inserted blow and let us know if they have addressed your "Discuss Points". The fixes will be in the revision-16. Also, the boiler plate issue is fixed in the revision-16. Thank you very much for the review and comments. Linda

Re: [bess] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman, Thank you very much for the comments and review. Please see the following resolutions to your "Discuss Points" inserted below in BLUE and see if they have addressed your Discussion Points. We will upload Revision 16 to include all the fixes for the issues you have pointed out.

Re: [bess] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16

As a co-author, I support the WG adoption. Linda Dunbar From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 5:45 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16 WG This email starts a one-week WG

Re: [bess] Mail regarding draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage

ShunWan, Thank you very much for review and the detailed comments. Resolutions to your comments are inserted below. Linda From: BESS On Behalf Of Zhuangshunwan Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 6:40 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Mail regarding draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage Dear

Re: [bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-05

Matthew and Stephane, At the IETF113 BESS session, your slides stated that draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage is the candidate for WG LC. Can you please let us know what actions we need to take to move the draft to WGLC? Thank you very much, Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, February 25

[bess] WGLC Request for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-05

Matthew and Stephane, At the IETF113 BESS session, your slides stated that draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage is the candidate for WG LC. Can you please let us know what actions we need to take to move the draft to WGLC? Thank you very much, Linda From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Friday, February 25

Re: [bess] draft-malyushkin-bess-ip-vpn-abstract-next-hops for WG review

lcome your comments and suggestions. Linda Dunbar From: BESS On Behalf Of Igor Malyushkin Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 8:45 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] draft-malyushkin-bess-ip-vpn-abstract-next-hops for WG review Hi all, Recently I posted a draft about a problem I've encountered as an IS

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-05

Matthew & Stephane, Thank you for moving this draft to WGLC. As a co-author, I support the WGLC for this draft. I am not aware of any IPR associated with this draft. Linda From: BESS on behalf of "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" Date: Monday, September 26, 2022 at 6:05 AM To: "bess@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] WG Last Call and IPR Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-05

Victo, Thank you very much for the constructive suggestions for the draft. They are very reasonable. We will update the draft per your suggestions. Linda From: BESS on behalf of Shengcheng Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 6:26 AM To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" , "bess@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-06

Shuping, Thank you very much for the review. Sorry for the late response. Please see below of the changes to address your comments. -Original Message- From: Shuping Peng via Datatracker Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 2:36 AM To: rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org;

Re: [bess] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-06

. -Original Message- From: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 7:49 PM To: Linda Dunbar ; rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage@ietf.org Subject: RE: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-06 Hi Linda, Please find

Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

To: Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Thanks Linda This looks fine to me. Regards Matthew From: Linda Dunbar mailto:linda.dun...@futurewei.com>> Date: Tuesday, 21 March 2023

Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07.txt

ilable from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : BGP Usage for SDWAN Overlay Networks Authors : Linda Dunbar James Guichard Ali S

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-06

Can the authors address my comments for the WG Adoption posted on May 30? Attached for the convenience. Thank you, Linda From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Sent: Friday, June 9, 2023 9:31 AM To: bess@ietf.org Cc: draft-sajassi-bess-secure-e...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org

Re: [bess] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-14

Stephen, Thank you very much for the review and comments. Sorry for the delayed response Resolution to your suggested are inserted below. Revised draft will be posted next week when the IETF submission opens. Linda -Original Message- From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker Sent:

Re: [bess] WG Adoption and IPR poll for draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-06

I support the WG adoption with the following questions and comments: - Section 5: How is the IPsec Databases (SPD, SAD, and generating Keying material for IPsec SAs) different from the traditional IPsec Data Base generation described in the RFC 4301? Can you please emphasize the

Re: [bess] IETF 117 BESS - IPv6 Only PE Design & IPv4 Only PE Design ALL SAFI Supported

Support the merging of those drafts. Linda Dunbar From: BESS On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:32 PM To: BESS ; bess-cha...@ietf.org; Dongjie (Jimmy) Subject: [bess] IETF 117 BESS - IPv6 Only PE Design & IPv4 Only PE Design ALL SAFI Supported Dear BESS WG, >

Re: [bess] Appointment of additional WG Chair

Congratulations Jeffrey! Best Regards Linda 发件人: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> 代表 Andrew Alston - IETF 发送时间: 2023年8月4日 10:45 收件人: bess@ietf.org 抄送: bess-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [bess] Appointment of additional WG Chair Hi WG, Following

Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

Matthew, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage/ fixed the warnings of the IPv4 addresses. Thanks, Linda From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 1:34 AM To: Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [bess] Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07

: Monday, June 26, 2023 3:59 AM To: Linda Dunbar ; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Document shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-07 Hi Linda In addition, there seems to be an issue with the authors list. You have 7 listed at the header

Re: [bess] Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks) to Informational RFC

Adrian, Thank you. Below are the resolutions to your additional comments. Please let us know if you have further comments. Thank you very much, Linda From: Adrian Farrel Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 4:33 AM To: Linda Dunbar ; last-c...@ietf.org Cc: andrew-i...@liquid.tech; bess-cha

Re: [bess] Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks) to Informational RFC

VPN that has added WAN ports to other networks. Thank you. Linda From: Adrian Farrel Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 3:28 AM To: Linda Dunbar ; last-c...@ietf.org Cc: andrew-i...@liquid.tech; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org; matthew.bo

Re: [bess] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-20

Stephen, BGP/TLS has been deployed (see the attached email from Robert Razuk on using BGP over TLS in Sproute's SDWAN solution for years) even though there is only a 00 draft for BGP over TLS in IETF. The document states that analysis of BGP over TLS is beyond the scope. Is the following

[bess] Can you please confirm if the changes of BGP over TLS are acceptable? RE: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

. While beyond the scope of this document, conducting a comprehensive analysis is imperative to ensure the security of BGP over TLS [BGP-OVER-TLS] . What do you think? Thank you, Linda _ From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 12:41 PM

Re: [bess] Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks) to Informational RFC

- From: John Scudder Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 11:22 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; Andrew Alston - IETF ; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org; matthew.bo...@nokia.com Subject: Re: Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks

Re: [bess] Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks) to Informational RFC

John, There is a draft on BGP over TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wirtgen-bgp-tls/ We are working with the author to enhance the draft. We will add the reference to BGP over TLS. And remove the BGP over DTLS. Can those changes address your comments? Thank you, Linda

Re: [bess] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-19

Stephen, Thank you very much for the comments. Please see the resolution below. Linda -Original Message- From: Stephen Farrell via Datatracker Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 8:03 AM To: sec...@ietf.org Cc: bess@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org

Re: [bess] Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks) to Informational RFC

Adrian, Please see below for the resolutions to your remaining comments. Thank you very much for the detailed comments. Linda -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2024 3:54 PM To: last-c...@ietf.org Cc: andrew-i...@liquid.tech; bess-cha...@ietf.org;

Re: [bess] Last Call: (BGP Usage for SD-WAN Overlay Networks) to Informational RFC

Adrian, Thank you very much for the extensive comments and suggestions. I am breaking the resolutions in two separate emails. This one addresses the comments to Section 3.1.2. Will have another email addressing the remaining comments. Can you check if the resolutions to your comments inserted

Re: [bess] (FW: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-usage-17

service should support the SD-WAN UNI service attributes at the SD-WAN edge as described in MEF 70.1, Section 11. From: Najem, Basil Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 1:24 PM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org Subject: RE: (FW: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwa

  1   2   >