Hi :)
Doesn't that count as TDF sending you to a conference? Therefore it's part of
your job to attend these sorts of things? Presumably some of the time you
might be working with other projects or your own things rather than
representing TDF all the time so only the regular hours count, not
Hi :)
That 40 sounds bizzare. Some have already claimed more than that on travel
without being even slightly dishonourable. Far from it in fact, they seem to
have gone to extraordinary pains to keep costs down and i really can't imagine
people in other organisations going that far. It's an
Hi :)
Hopefully these costs will go up quite dramatically every year because it's an
indicator of success. It's going up because we know that a LOT more people
will be stopping and taking an interest in TDF and LibreOffice at the event
(and at other events). Also hopefully more people might
Hi :)
I think just the vote count is fine. If people want more info they can look
through the appropriate thread. I do quite like the idea of a list of names as
a way of people checking they were counted correctly but there are times when a
vote needs to be taken anonymously. So, on balance
Hi :)
+1
Ok, i am not a voting member but the options here seem to be
1. accept the donation and get an asset that might be useful (probably will be
enormously useful)
2. hand back the dosh
So i am not really clear why it's even up for discussion or voting on but i
guess it's good policy jic
Hi :)
Blimey!! Given the work you do here i hope the BoD is able to stump-up the
extra 100 to save you the 8hours journey!! It'd be more cost-effective to get
you the shorter flight so that you are not worn out (at either end) by the
trip!
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Mon, 9/1/12, Florian
Hi :)
I think that is welcome back really! Andre has done a huge amount here too
so wb Andre! :)
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 10/1/12, Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [board-discuss] New members
Hi :)
The key words afaik are as a legal entity. TDF's assets are currently being
looked after by 1 (or more) of the community organisations that are legally
registered as legal entitys. TDF has not yet gained the status of being a
legal entity. When it does the assets will be transferred.
Hi :)
+1
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 6/11/11, Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
wrote:
From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [board-discuss] poll on regular BoD times
To: board-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Sunday, 6
Hi :)
I think OpenOffice before the forking was under some fairly strange leadership.
ie a company that worked hard to increase community participation but not
being very trusting of the communities they had grown = actively blocking many
proposed patches and stuff developed by the community.
/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Preparing elections for the membership
committee
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Tuesday, 1 November, 2011, 15:16
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom
Hi :)
Florian. It is good to have these issues dealt with. There is no need to
apologise for 'spam' as it is all relevant and important stuff. If these issue
weren't raised today they would have to be raised another day and they are the
type of thing that is good to deal with and get out of
Hi :)
+1
to board. It's more generic and so people will recognise it more easily from
other organisations. All 3 options have delightful puns of course.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Wed, 26/10/11, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com
Hi :)
How about just keeping the current name, steering-discuss, or perhaps the 3
boards could be;
- directors-discuss
- advisory-discuss
- trustees-discuss
with this one being the directors-discuss? BoD is fairly unique to TDF so
it's not very transparent to people outside of the
...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] renaming this list
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Wednesday, 26 October, 2011, 19:10
Hi,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-10-26 17:50:
How about just keeping
...@suse.com
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Candidacy for Board: Michael Meeks
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Monday, 10 October, 2011, 10:11
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 18:02 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
One of the top priorities for the Documentation Team right now
is a guide
Hi :)
One of the top priorities for the Documentation Team right now is a guide to
help people that want to start programming for LibreOffice.
There is already a good one for Extensions but most of the scattered things we
have for programmers are apparently for OpenOffice when it was under
list?
To: Tom Daviestomdavie...@yahoo.co.**uk tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc:
steering-discuss@**documentfoundation.orgsteering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Monday, 12 September, 2011, 15:34
Tom Davies wrote:
Do you mean how many expressed an interest and tried to give it a
go during
about how to re-invigorate that part of the project.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 13/9/11, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
From: Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Base - a new mailing list?
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Base - a new mailing list?
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Tuesday, 13 September, 2011, 9:25
Tom Davies wrote:
Done that. Been there. It didn't work. Base is dying. Can we
just admit that and remove
- a new mailing list?
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Monday, 12 September, 2011, 15:34
Tom Davies wrote:
Do you mean how many expressed an interest and tried to give it a
go during the past year or do you mean how many at any one time or
do
Hi :)
A few people have asked about starting up a new mailing list to try to bring
together people that want to work on Base. People from Documentation,
Developers perhaps later on some people from Design.
At the moment there are people that want to work on Base but each is isolated
and
Hi :)
+1
For meetings, conferences, training days and stuff like that we would often
have
an amount for refreshments. In End of Year Accounts or Financial
Statements for SMBs (Small-Medium sized Business) there is often be an item
labelled Refreshments buried in Other Expenses. Is food not
Hi :)
I think that counts as 6 votes with none against, so it's nem con or
something. The votes from deputies doesn't count if the people they are
deputies for have voted. Not that it makes much difference since it's still a
strong majority with none against.
Regards from
Tom :)
Hi :)
It's all good. We get there in the end. Hopefully in a more elegant and less
turgid way next time!
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 12 August, 2011 17:30:55
Subject: Re:
Hi :)
+1
Possibly omit the middle paragraph. It would leave the statement without an
explanation but at least it would state what the preference is.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
To:
Hi :)
+1
Also, allowing threads (such as the one about job-description for marketing
contacts) to split out to other, more relevant, lists is great and seems to be
working fine.
It's inevitable that discussions take place all over the place because there is
a lot of energy and excitement
Hi :)
+1
definitely.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 12 August, 2011 16:55:51
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] contracting a lawyer for the foundation's
August, 2011 7:08:01
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] addition to trademark policy
Hi Tom, all!
A quick note ... mis-using the steering-discuss being an SC deputy.
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2011, 10:35 +0100 schrieb Tom Davies:
Sounds good to me but i'm curious about the Branding Team's thoughts
, 2011 16:15:44
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] addition to trademark policy
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 17:06 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-08-10 16:45:
if it could be that simple then it would be easy to give quick answers to
requests. I'm not sure what
: [steering-discuss] decision on screenshots
My proposal stands :-) :-)
On 8 Aug 2011, at 01:04, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
That would completely change the statement. It is the opposite of what
Florian
wrote. Are we going to reopen discussion about the issue again?
Regards from
Tom
Hi :)
It's easy to make empty promises but there is nothing written down to say that
the Steering Committee and BoD would accept any responsibility at all. The
risk
is all on individual contributors at the moment.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: André Schnabel
:)
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 8 August, 2011 18:41:05
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] decision on screenshots
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
I think that unnecessarily
as
the earlier text but ensures we do not leave hostages to fortune.
Are there any others sharing Tom's concern please?
S.
/:-)
On 8 Aug 2011, at 23:59, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
There were a reasonable amount of +1s to the first draft produced by
Florian
and no-one voted against it then or after
:59:15
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] addition to trademark policy
Hi,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-08-06 13:54:
Has the marketing or Branding team (or reps here) approved of either this
version or the original? Since both have very much the same meanings i think
approval of either would be good
Hi :)
That would completely change the statement. It is the opposite of what Florian
wrote. Are we going to reopen discussion about the issue again?
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent:
Hi :)
I thought this issue had been settled with
It is noted that several members of the SC acknowledge the existence of a
legal
risk to display screenshots of LibreOffice on Windows, but the risk is deemed
low, therefore, while screenshots on GNU/Linux should be the default ones,
screenshots
Hi :)
I think the new wording is much clearer.
Bullet-points definitely helped imo. The wording seems about as smooth and
straight forward as it is likely to get without changing the meanings. It's a
LOT less turgid than many simialr things i have read but seems to deal with the
legal and
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 6 August, 2011 13:57:43
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] decision on screenshots
Hi all,
Florian - thank you for this follow up :-)
Am Samstag, den 06.08.2011, 11:26 +0100 schrieb Tom Davies:
Hi :)
I thought this issue had been settled
Hi :)
I think that in the specific case of David it would be smart to invite him to
join the sys-admin team. I do appreciate it might not be good to allow
everyone
to join as and when they feel like it but David is a significant contributor to
the docs team in that role. If he isn't invited
:)
From: Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 1 August, 2011 12:54:23
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base record access
unacceptably slow
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 19:26 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
I think
Hi :)
Thanks Alex. It's always good to hear the legal fact rather than the rest of
us
just guessing at what seems reasonable. Presumably the org has to be spelled
out in full? Can it say on behalf of TDF? Something like
The LibreOffice trademark is registered to Freies Office Deutschland
Hi :)
I think the SC just voted on the 600 euroes excess. I think the full amount
might need another vote. Coincidentally i think there is an Sc Meeting
tonight(?) so it could be done quite quickly there? Perhaps vote on the full
amount first and if that gets defeated then vote on the
Hi :)
So the work was done for TDF but the decision to do the work was taken by one
of
the communities.
I thought the event was a different one. One that had been discussed in here.
I remember people using the mailing list to meet up for further discussion at
the end of one of the days
.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org; Tom Davies
tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: us...@global.libreoffice.org; documentat...@global.libreoffice.org;
hc.stoellin...@aon.at; t...@tomcloyd.com
Hi :)
Please can you use Reply to all when replying to this or find some other way
of including
pe...@kubek.sk
as he is not subscribed to this list (yet)
Regards from
Tom :)
- Forwarded Message
From: Peter Kubek pe...@kubek.sk
To: us...@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Wed, 20 July,
Hi :)
I think other people already have permissions set so they can unlock (or
whatever) the room? That was about the only trouble last time i think but it
was a total blocker at the time. This time people have permissions?
Regards from
Tom :)
From:
Hi :)
+1 to all this.
The agreed wording, that keeps getting repeated, allows screen-shots to be
taken in MS Windows. The wording also cleverly allows screen-shots on other
platforms.
The perceived issue with MS is that MS Office is possibly their main income
stream. People might buy
Hi :)
I found a page about Calc in Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Calc
but it's heavily branded as the OpenOffice version. Writer has 2 pages. One
for OpenOffice and 1 for LibreOffice.
Would it be better to move towards having just 1 page for each application and
then
,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-07-12 15.54:
Ahah, this is the email i have been looking for. I really like the idea of a
link so that people can check the latest news about progress.
It is an independent self-governing meritocratic Foundation, currently in
the
process of being established
Hi :)
I agree with Italo that the different teams have different requirements to
achieve different results.
Marketing and Website is tactical and dynamic, able to change fairly quickly.
Sometimes being highly responsive, sometimes anticipating, sometimes getting
far
ahead of the game.
Hi :)
Ahah, now i see the point of David's post. I think item 2 is not impartially
worded. It seems to attempt to make people's minds up for them = to impose
random chaos in the documentation!
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Florian Effenberger
@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, 13 July, 2011 10:59:39
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] wording on TDF website
Hi,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-07-12 15.54:
It is an independent self-governing meritocratic Foundation, currently in
the
process of being established by leading members
Hi :)
Would his description be more accurate if someone changed it from ...
David is the LibreOffice community representative in Brazil.
to
David is a LibreOffice community representative in Brazil.
It is difficult to claim someone is representing any community accurately as
Hi :)
+1
All things, however unlikely, are possibly possible. I agree that we shouldn't
spend much more time on this. I just wondered if there was a quick fix to
solve the issue but if it doesn't fix the problem then there is no need to
drag
the argument back into the spotlight.
Regards
Hi :)
+1
Regards from
Tom :)
From: David Nelson li...@traduction.biz
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, 13 July, 2011 16:34:05
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Hi Italo, Drew,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at
Hi :)
I think the question should be
Can the documentation team continue to be consistent and use themes that it
previously agreed or should it switch to using Windows and therefore make
documentation have randomly different themes and OSes for screen-shots?
With possible sub-questions to be
Hi :)
I don't think it was controversial! An issue was flagged up but just as
something to notice in passing rather than blocking David from helping do good
work! Has the limit on the number of people that could usefully help been
reached or could David be allowed in?
Regards from
Tom :)
call notes for 2011-07-13
Hello Tom,
I don't use Word but I used different wiki formattings...
best,
Charles.
2011/7/13 Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Hi :)
Fantastic :)) A good result for all concerned! Thanks all that attended,
especially Charles for taking the notes and Florian
Hi :)
+1
to the idea of this being voted on by the SC/BoD without re-arguing the points.
I had hoped the discussion would just congratulate the Documentation Team on
neatly avoiding potential pitfalls that would take months to fix if MS used it
as a side-issue in a any future dealings with
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: screen-shots Documentation Team
Tom Davies wrote:
I had hoped the discussion would just congratulate the Documentation Team on
neatly avoiding potential pitfalls that would take months to fix if MS used it
as a side-issue in a any future dealings with them
Hi :)
Ahah, this is the email i have been looking for. I really like the idea of a
link so that people can check the latest news about progress.
It is an independent self-governing meritocratic Foundation, currently in the
process of being established by leading members of the OpenOffice.org
Hi :)
+1
The images to the right might need to be moved up a little bit too in order to
keep the page looking tidy. I think just remove the bullet point and see how
the page looks.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
:48, Tom Davies a écrit :
Everyone : To me, the point has more to do with SC communication. Once
again, a topic has raised its head that I considered dealt with, and
now it is back on the table.
Although not a member of the SC, the question of the legality of
screenshot usage and associated
Hi :)
In the MS vs TomTom case significant 'damages' were awarded to MS because
TomTom
were using a file-system that could be read by Windows
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._TomTom
http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Microsoft_v._TomTom_%282008,_USA%29
TomTom 'should' have been paying MS for the
Hi :)
I think i would favour Italo's pasta. Does anyone remember the BBC's April 1st
documentary on Italian 'vineyard's that supposedly grew pasta instead of
grapes? Germany is famous for many things but Italy wins on pasta.
Regards from
Tom :)
From:
relevant links or something quotable.
Regards from
Tom :)
- Forwarded Message
From: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed, 6 July, 2011 10:48:31
Subject: screen-shots Documentation Team
Hi
The documentation team has been told by various
From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 18 June, 2011 12:51:17
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium
Hi all,
On 18/06/2011 09:58, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
klaus-jürgen
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 18 June, 2011 19:18:40
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
I think that
Hi :)
It would look slightly more normal as:
Please read carefully
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Thu, 16 June, 2011 6:55:06
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] proposed
Hi :
Please ignore my last email. I didn't realise the words were part of a
sentence
rather than being the entire statement. Context is everything i should have
checked.
It looks good already :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Francois Tigeot
Hi :)
I wouldn't worry about it. It's fine in business speak. If you do change it
then it needs to be more like ...
Each organization *can appoint* a single representative to the Advisory Board
based on a yearly fee to be determined by the BoD.
The problem then is that it's passive and
Hi :)
I thought the GPL, LGPL MPL were all much more permissive than the Apache
licenses? I thought the whole point of OpenSource was that it is
contra-intuitive. By insisting on intellectual freedoms, ideas are able to
build on each other more easily.
Regards from
Tom :)
Hi :)
I think it is better to do the minimum that is required to make it legal and
for
the rest write in things like Mid-term replacements are to be covered by
internal TDF policy which is to be reviewed regularly. In some cases it makes
sense to name the specific document that will cover
Hi :)
I thought everyone quickly checked that sort of thing anyway? I do. I thought
David was making a joke out of the need for people to be a little more aware of
one need for checking such rules. A serious point put forwards as a joke.
Regards from
Tom :)
Hi :)
Someone mailed me off-list thinking it was my comment and quoted a real-world
legal case where someone had really done what you describe. It is an old joke
and an obvious thing to avoid but i'm not hugely surprised one bunch of people
got fooled into letting it happen! It's impossible
Hi :)
I am sure you are welcome to stay in even if it's only to help iron-out any
misunderstandings as they arise but if you don't feel comfortable then don't.
Sounds like you have been doing good work :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Norbert Thiebaud
Hi :)
Thanks :) The voting system sounds interesting. I like the idea of
non-binding votes for people that might not have joined as proper members yet
but might have significant interest in the Apache Foundation.
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)
From: Greg
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Thu, 9 June, 2011 9:17:13
Subject: [steering-discuss] proposed bylaws changes
Hello,
as we are moving forward with legally setting up the foundation,
From: David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Thu, 9 June, 2011 11:24:02
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] proposed bylaws changes
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 13:15, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
From: David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Cc: steering-disc...@global.documentfoundation.org
Sent: Thu, 9 June, 2011 20:22:51
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] proposed bylaws changes
Hi Florian,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011
Hi :)
I think 100 is still quite small compared to the numbers of people actually
involved. So the list of members is still more like a special-interest
sub-set. The founder members are doing a great job and i hope that they stay
in
place for a long while yet.
Regards from
Tom :)
-
- Original Message
From: Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 11:02:56
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
Hi,
2011/6/6 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org:
Tom Davies wrote
- Original Message
From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 12:10:30
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
Hi Volker, all,
On 06/06/2011 13:02, Volker Merschmann wrote:
[...]
I'd like to add that
- Original Message
From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 4 June, 2011 14:03:55
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Re: OpenOffice.org Apache Incubator Proposal:
Splitting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HREUNITING the Community?
On Sat,
- Original Message
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com;
steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 4 June, 2011 19:12:45
Subject: [steering-discuss] Re: OpenOffice.org Apache
Hi :)
If there is some sort of voice recording (perhaps via Voip?) then perhaps some
minutes could be generated? I'm not a touch-typist but there are probably
people around that could do something or perhaps just place the recording
wherre
minutes are usually kept?
Regards from
Tom :)
Hi :)
I think the devastation is on such a massive scale it makes the twin towers
incident seem tiny, contained and inconsequential by comparison yet that had
repercussions globally. All disasters are, of course, horrendous but the scale
of this is unprecedented.
The Japanese people have
I'm not a voting member but it all looks good to me, apart from being inquorate
and these glitches are unavoidable sometimes.
Many thanks to all of you for an excellent first release and an amazing job in
setting up community systems so quickly!
Congrats, thanks and regards from
Tom :)
Hi
I think Oracle have decided they are competing with LibreOffice but so far we
seem to be co-operating with them. It would be wise for us to
1. Beat them to the finish line.
2. Keep aware of what they are doing, odd stats can help sometimes
3. Keep going the way we have been, rapid
Preferring to support other OpenSource projects is a good aim but 22 € is
easier
to pay if that covers all of us and all the lists to get it sorted fast. It
does mean continuing to use existing systems that people are now familiar with
which is an advantage. Generally i would say we should
Hi guys ...
ladies [ bows ]
I think that giving @LibreOffice.Org email addresses out to even non-members
would be a good way of getting the name Libre Office out there and visible.
People don't assume that Yahoo is represented by people with an @Yahoo.Co.Uk
address so could we do
-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then
it gets the name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot
of people. Free advertising!
+1
For some people this is even a matter of pride, like wearing a
t-shirt with a well known
schrieb:
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then
it gets the name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot
of people. Free advertising!
+1
For some people this is even a matter of pride, like wearing a
t
Hello Tom,
2011/1/17 Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Yes, obviously we can't force people to use any email address!
For me the question is how to be attractive enough that people do want to
choose
to use it. Often just making something exclusive makes people want it
more,
especially
Brilliant :))
A good answer to cover all the concerns raised. A small team with input from
different mailing-list groups. General discussion about that website and all
the 'local' ones can be kept to the website mailing-list with any luck.
Perhaps an occasional report to SC would be the
January, 2011 19:21:10
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] libreoffice.org e-mail accounts
Em 14-01-2011 16:16, Tom Davies escreveu:
OTOH if people use the email address per...@openoffice.org then it gets the
name OpenOffice out there and being seen by a lot of people. Free
advertising!
+1
For some
Hi :)
I think it does need doing at some point if you are happy doing it then that
is fantastic :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Mon, 27 December, 2010 16:15:05
Hi
We are still getting a lot of traffic in here about the website and i really
think we need to avoid every group micro-managing every other group. People
can
easily join 2 or more lists to stay updated on different groups. David quite
properly sent the email he was referring to to the
Hi :)
I like the way the website is at the moment.
I also quite like the proposed screenshot except that i would prefer the
download button on the left so that people can access it without having to
scroll sideways.
Ok, it may not be perfect for everyone but what we have got works well. It
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
