Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-09-29 Thread Alberto Monteiro
JDG wrote: Not at all. The Assumption is interesting because it is a two- fer. If you disagree with this dogma, then by definition, you also have to disagree with the dogma of papal infallability. Would you claim that any person that believes in some dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church

Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-09-29 Thread William T Goodall
On 29 Sep 2006, at 1:09PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Would you claim that any person that believes in some dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church but disbelieves in other dogmas [say, a person that claims to be a good catholic but regularly gets impregnated by different men and goes to an abortion

RE: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-09-29 Thread Ritu
Robert Seeberger wrote: She gave birth to GOD! She must have been stretch marks from the neck down! xponent Admit It, You Were Thinking It Too! Maru I was thinking that none of the gods born to goddesses here actually involved pregnancy and childbirth...I've been known to crib about

Re: The Assumption

2006-09-29 Thread Jim Sharkey
Alberto Monteiro wrote: Would you claim that any person that believes in some dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church but disbelieves in other dogmas is, in reality, not a catholic? That's an interesting question. I think, in general, most people pick and choose from a menu of sorts, regardless

Re: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-09-29 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 09:59 AM Thursday 9/28/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: Robert G. Seeberger wrote: Perhaps we should stop calling that group Al Qaeda and start calling them Al Kato. (After Clousseau's sparring partnerG) I see that and think O.J. Simpson's guest. :P What is it

RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab...

2006-09-29 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronn!Blankenship Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:30 PM To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' Subject: RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab... I was thinking of a

We Will Not Be Afraid

2006-09-29 Thread Nick Arnett
I've been working on a poem with some friends. Perhaps some of you will appreciate this. We Will Not Be Afraid Our country will be attacked And we will know outrage But we will not be afraid. Our children will carry our hearts to combat And they will give their lives But we will not be

Re: Infinities large and small

2006-09-29 Thread Richard Baker
DanM said: Right, but there are not as many integers as there are real numbers between 0 and 1. :-) And there are the same number of those as there are subsets of the integers. Rich ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: The Assumption

2006-09-29 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 29 Sep 2006 at 8:38, Jim Sharkey wrote: However, since we are done having kids, I got a snipping. And as such, I think there are Catholics out there who would say she's not a good Catholic because of that fact alone. Interesting. I mean... okay, yes, Jews are a people as well as a

RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab...

2006-09-29 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pencimen Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:57 PM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab... Dan wrote: Their per

Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-09-29 Thread Julia Thompson
jdiebremse wrote: --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bodacious??? Bodacious??? My God man! She gave birth to GOD! She must have been stretch marks from the neck down! xponent Admit It, You Were Thinking It Too! Maru rob Actually, there is a tradition of

RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab...

2006-09-29 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pencimen Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:13 PM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab... Ronn! wrote: What if we

RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab...

2006-09-29 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pencimen Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 11:38 PM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe when there is no reliab... Dan wrote:

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Julia Thompson
Nick Arnett wrote: On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't a little infinite a contradiction, like a little bit . . . ? No... some infinities are smaller than others, as is easily demonstrated. There are an infinite number of even numbers and an infinite number of odd

RE: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:33 AM Friday 9/29/2006, Ritu wrote: Robert Seeberger wrote: She gave birth to GOD! She must have been stretch marks from the neck down! xponent Admit It, You Were Thinking It Too! Maru I was thinking that none of the gods born to goddesses here actually involved pregnancy and

Re: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 08:09 AM Friday 9/29/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 09:59 AM Thursday 9/28/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: Robert G. Seeberger wrote: Perhaps we should stop calling that group Al Qaeda and start calling them Al Kato. (After Clousseau's sparring partnerG) I see that

RE: Global warming (WAS RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe ...

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 08:19 AM Friday 9/29/2006, Dan Minette wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronn!Blankenship Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:30 PM To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' Subject: RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we

Re: The Assumption

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 02:34 PM Friday 9/29/2006, Andrew Crystall wrote: Also, I don't believe there's such a thing as a non-practicing Muslim by definition, either you practice or you're not.. ...alive any more. -- Ronn! :) ___

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:34 PM Subject: Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies) Nick Arnett wrote: On 9/28/06, Ronn!Blankenship

Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:09 AM Friday 9/29/2006, Alberto Monteiro wrote: JDG wrote: Not at all. The Assumption is interesting because it is a two- fer. If you disagree with this dogma, then by definition, you also have to disagree with the dogma of papal infallability. Would you claim that any person that

RE: Global warming (WAS RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe ...

2006-09-29 Thread Dan Minette
My question is whether a cut of 60% or 94% or whatever figure you found and cited as necessary to stop or reverse the environmental damage, or a cut even a fraction as large, a cut large enough to see _any_ gains wrt global warming, no matter how minuscule, will lead to a pause for a few

Re: What plans???

2006-09-29 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: In one of the Democratic party's regular mass mailings, from Howard Dean today, I read this: You know that Democrats have a real plan for destroying Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, fixing the mess in Iraq, and really securing us at home. WTF? I

Re: Someone Must Tell Them

2006-09-29 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Dave Land wrote: A couple of weeks ago, she sent me the following, which sums up some thoughts I've ben having lately about what's wrong with the current administration's approach to terrorism -- it gives the terrorists just what they want: for us to be afraid. For

RE: The Assumption

2006-09-29 Thread Ritu
Andrew Crystall wrote: Also, I don't believe there's such a thing as a non-practicing Muslim by definition, either you practice or you're not.. That's an erroneous belief. There are plenty of non-practising muslims - people who are born into the religion, brought up as muslims, and don't

RE: Global warming (WAS RE: 9/11 conspiracies (WAS RE: What should we believe ...

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 09:07 PM Friday 9/29/2006, Dan Minette wrote: My question is whether a cut of 60% or 94% or whatever figure you found and cited as necessary to stop or reverse the environmental damage, or a cut even a fraction as large, a cut large enough to see _any_ gains wrt global warming, no matter

Re: What plans???

2006-09-29 Thread Nick Arnett
On 9/29/06, Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it's on page 15, right after the Homosexual Agenda. Did you not receive your packet? You funny man. Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 ___

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Nick Arnett
On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :) No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them. Okay, I didn't count ALL of them. But I counted

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Julia Thompson
Robert Seeberger wrote: - Original Message - From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 5:34 PM Subject: Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11conspiracies) Nick Arnett wrote: On

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Julia Thompson
Nick Arnett wrote: On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :) No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it. I counted them. Well, hey, they are a COUNTABLE

Re: What plans???

2006-09-29 Thread Julia Thompson
Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: In one of the Democratic party's regular mass mailings, from Howard Dean today, I read this: You know that Democrats have a real plan for destroying Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, fixing the mess in Iraq, and really

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Medievalbk
Infinity - (Infinity -1) = Infinity My brain hurts. Can I have a cookie? ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Infinities large and small (was Re: The Assumption Re: 9/11 conspiracies)

2006-09-29 Thread Charlie Bell
On 30/09/2006, at 1:43 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Nick Arnett wrote: On 9/29/06, Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, it's the SAME SIZE as each of the first two. THAT'S the one that took me a week or two to wrap my head around. :) No, they're not the same size. I'm sure of it.

Re: What plans???

2006-09-29 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 10:45 PM Friday 9/29/2006, Julia Thompson wrote: Dang, mine got cut off halfway through the Homosexual Agenda Sounds painful . . . ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l