Boris,
Are there enough new features in the trunk to warrant a 3.2 release?
Just adding support for a new platform should not be considered a
feature. This is why I suggested a 3.1.2 patch release.
I am building and testing xerces-c from the trunk on the following
platforms: VC7.1 VC8 VC9 VC10
On 04/11/2013 12:59 PM, shath...@e-z.net wrote:
>> On 4/11/13 12:35 PM, "shath...@e-z.net" wrote:
>>
>> I don't do Debian, but those packages exist, and that is the manner in
>> which Debian users want and need to get the software. Binaries just don't
>> fly.
> I can check with Debian and Ubuntu
On 4/11/13 12:59 PM, "shath...@e-z.net" wrote:
>
>I can check with Debian and Ubuntu integration teams to see what
>support there is to create (.deb) packages for their distributions.
I can't speak for Ubuntu, but there are official shibboleth packages for
Debian (that I don't maintain) and that
> On 4/11/13 12:35 PM, "shath...@e-z.net" wrote:
>
>>Besides windows builds with VS 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 -
>>I also perform builds on FreeBSD, PCBSD, and GNU Linux.
>>I DO NOT build packages for Debian and RedHat package managers.
>>I DO build debug and release builds of Xerces-C from sour
On 4/11/13 12:35 PM, "shath...@e-z.net" wrote:
>Besides windows builds with VS 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 -
>I also perform builds on FreeBSD, PCBSD, and GNU Linux.
>I DO NOT build packages for Debian and RedHat package managers.
>I DO build debug and release builds of Xerces-C from sources.
F
Scott & Boris,
Besides windows builds with VS 2003, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 -
I also perform builds on FreeBSD, PCBSD, and GNU Linux.
I DO NOT build packages for Debian and RedHat package managers.
I DO build debug and release builds of Xerces-C from sources.
I can send some pings to other Xerces/
On 4/11/13 5:03 AM, "Boris Kolpackov" wrote:
>
>> I would suggest as a way of perhaps reducing time commitment than
>>actually
>> producing binaries for other than Windows is not a great use of time.
>
>Yes, I was also thinking along those lines, especially for platforms
>like HPUX, AIX, etc. But
Thanks Boris!
I will be glad to pursue the release issues, patches, documentation,
and features. Expect to see more activity from me on these in JIRA.
Steven J. Hathaway
> Hi Steven,
>
> shath...@e-z.net writes:
>
>> I would like to see a patch release for Xerces-C (XML Parser).
>>
>> The curr
Hi Scott,
Cantor, Scott writes:
> I'm happy to spend some time testing the build on my supported platforms
> once it's ready to go.
Yes, that would great. The more testing we can get done, the better.
> I would suggest as a way of perhaps reducing time commitment than actually
> producing bin
On 4/10/13 10:46 AM, "Boris Kolpackov" wrote:
>I was hoping to find time and make a release around June or July.
>It would also be a good idea to spend some time and try to fix some
>new bugs that have been uncovered since the 3.1.0 release. Not sure
>if you would like to wait or if you want to p
Hi Steven,
shath...@e-z.net writes:
> I would like to see a patch release for Xerces-C (XML Parser).
>
> The current version of Xerces is 3.1.1.
> I propose a patch relase of Xerces-C as 3.1.2.
A bugfix release (e.g., 3.1.2) would normally be released to fix
something, not to add new features.
11 matches
Mail list logo
