Is it possible to copy a directory and all its contents without using
cfexecute?
http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/cfc/tmt_file_io
This CFC does copy, move, delete and more
Massimo Foti
DW tools: http://www.massimocorner.com
CF tools: http://www.olimpo.ch/tmt/
are u serious??? LMFAO!!!
we don't use it as a standard, you may but surely don't include me
wait till u start to make compliant wrbsites then say that.
its more like ppl use ie because they don't know any better or they don't know
they have better choices.
its funny u say this because i read
Jim Davis wrote:
Remember that in the case of spyware Attacked doesn't have to indicate any
security limitation in the client software. Spyware does not get on IE
machines because IE is less secure. Spyware gets on IE machines for the
same reason it gets on any machine: because people are
BTW, I've added unzip and view zip content capability to the file
manager. Not released with the changes though, I've gotta figure out
the preview thing.
If you want to do fancy things, you can get directory listing from a zip
file, or allow unzip of only part of the files contained inside
Attachments not allowed...stick it in the message ;-)
ooops :)
Error Occurred While Processing Request
Corrupt form data: premature ending
Please try the following:
Check the ColdFusion documentation to verify that you are using the
correct syntax.
Search the Knowledge Base to find a
I know of an ISP that, after an analysis concluded that 80% of
the support calls was spyware related, instituted an use IE,
lose support policy. That proves to be quite compelling.
That's not going to protect them from adware and spyware installed by file
sharing apps, gambling software and
B*llsh*t. A significant part or even the majority installs itself
through IE vulnerabilities:
http://www.benedelman.org/news/111804-1.html
My guess would be that he intentionally went to a site specifically designed
to exploit his particular software configuration. More to the point, I bet
he
Anyone has an idea? or where could i read on div and iframe
for firefox?
http://mozref.com/
--
dc
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net
Message:
What about the addressVerify function? It verifies an email against a
given address - and returns and error code if the email is not associated
with a valid paypal account. Does your CFX tag support that function?
-Original Message-
From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Lewis,
Could you explain your accronyms.. GTF, RF and TS
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: paypal API
Mark A Kruger wrote:
I'm looking for a Java class or CFC implimentation of
We're not using client variables (default storage in cfadmin=none,
clientManagement=No, no DSNs are configured to use client variables,
or have the tables in them).
How would you suggest i use a manual checkpoint? Just open up query
analyser and run CHECKPOINT? Or place it in the code somewhere?
But, my point is, that if IE weren't around then alternative methods would
be employed to trick people into installing SpyWare. Do you really think
that the FireFox extensions architecture will NOT be used for spyware?
Are you arguing that IE should not be used or hat patched software should
not
Hi all,
CFMX 6.1 on Apache and Win 2003 Server. One of the 'apps' that is
heavily used in this environment is a simple enough one that lists all
the images/media in a user's server directory and then allows them to
play around with those images in a shell around the app. Obviously
cfdirectory is
I agree with Jim. The majority will always be targeted. If fireFox
held the market share, we'd be having this same converstaion in
reverse.
I think that IE is going to remain strong based on the fact that if
someone learns how to surf the web by clicking on the blue 'e', then
thats what they are
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:25:48 -0500, Adrocknaphobia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Jim. The majority will always be targeted. If fireFox
held the market share, we'd be having this same converstaion in
reverse.
No, because someone would fix the problem - I could fix it, you could
fix it,
If you're willing to spend that much for a VPS then you might as well
look into a dedicated server... CFDynamics has a plan you might be
interested in:
http://www.cfdynamics.com/dedicated/dedicatedhostingbasic.cfm
HTH
Hatton
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 12:35:57 +, John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Davis wrote:
True - but it might be nice if we could discover a way to convince people to
use software without blackmail.
You mean like all those ISPs that blackmail people into using
Windows because they refuse to support Linux? Or is that not
blackmail?
That's very circular reasoning:
Mark A Kruger wrote:
What about the addressVerify function? It verifies an email against a
given address - and returns and error code if the email is not associated
with a valid paypal account.
(Looks at paypal source code). You're quite right. An oversight. I was
focused on the main
more common sources, but I've never seen any statistics. As an ISP and
computer sales/repair shop, we've been recommending Firefox as an
alternative and installing it on customers computers. However, it doesn't
seem to protect them from themselves.
Too true. I just cleaned out my mother-in-law's
I did look at them but you need to comit for 12months etc to get CF
installed...:(
jb.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:40:50 -0500, C. Hatton Humphrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're willing to spend that much for a VPS then you might as well
look into a dedicated server... CFDynamics has a plan you
and pay $200 per month for 'maintenance'
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:46:27 +, John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did look at them but you need to comit for 12months etc to get CF
installed...:(
jb.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:40:50 -0500, C. Hatton Humphrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the perception felt by some people (myself included) is that if
some spyware turns up that I don't like I can crack open the firefox
source code and fix the problem myself. My fix may or may not end up
being incorporated in the publicly released code, but at least my
machines will be
That is because this is a responsibility of the OS, not the browser.
IMHO, that Mom should not be running a user account that can instantly install
such software.
Jerry
Jerry Johnson
Web Developer
Dolan Media Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/06/04 09:56AM
In my experience at least this is what
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:56:11 -0400, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the perception felt by some people (myself included) is that if
some spyware turns up that I don't like I can crack open the firefox
source code and fix the problem myself. My fix may or may not end up
being
We will soon move from Oracle 8i to Oracle 10g and from CF5 Enterprise on
Windows 2000 to CFMX 6.1 with updater on Windows 2000 (not all at the same
time . . .).
Has anyone run into problems using Oracle 10g with the CF5-supplied ODBC
drivers or the CFMX 6.1-supplied JDBC drivers?
Thanks!
Yes, cflooping around a cfhttp does cause problems. I believe this is a
known problem, and may still be a problem in CFMX 6.1. The best way
around it is to put your cfhttp call in a cffunction, then call that
function from within your loop. It makes no sense why that works better,
but it will
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:24:38 -0500, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Sean said Apache has its share of patches for security issues well. But
whether or not Apache (a server-side, presumably managed system) is more or
less secure doesn't really enter into it.
They do release a lot of
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:08:38 -0500, Earl, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We will soon move from Oracle 8i to Oracle 10g and from CF5 Enterprise on
Windows 2000 to CFMX 6.1 with updater on Windows 2000 (not all at the same
time . . .).
Has anyone run into problems using Oracle 10g with the
That is because this is a responsibility of the OS, not the browser.
IMHO, that Mom should not be running a user account that can instantly
install such software.
Easier said than done.
First instantly is questionable. A well patched box of any kind will not
allow the anonymous/hidden
The question is whether or not FireFox in mass use would reduce spyware -
I'm not sure it would. It very well might - I just don't know.
IE installs software without your consent - so yes it would reduce it
(using logic and experience not stats). After I install firefox on
systems and run
Hi
$200 a month is very cheap for maintenance.
If it's done properly of course
regards
REX
~
- Original Message -
From: John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: cfx hosting VPS Package
and pay $200 per month
Mark A Kruger wrote:
What about the addressVerify function? It verifies an email against a
given address - and returns and error code if the email is not associated
with a valid paypal account. Does your CFX tag support that function?
I get the feeling from the lack of doumentation it may be
I've got a trial CFXhosting VPS solution being setup for $1 for 30
days to see if it's all it's cracked up to be.
jb.
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:40:03 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
$200 a month is very cheap for maintenance.
If it's done properly of course
regards
I would bet that a simple firefox extension that did a lookup of known
URLs for spyware before anything is downloaded would make a significant
difference. As long as it alerted the user to the exact nature of the
spyware and it's potential negative impact the purpose would be served.
I
On a personal note, I'm actually kind of glad that other companies are
taking an interest at offering Cold Fusion in a VPS environment. Being a
developer myself, VPS environments give me all the control that I want
without the usual *enormous* price tag of a CF-enabled dedicated server.
That did it! You're the man Nathan.
Thanks-
Andrew
Yes, cflooping around a cfhttp does cause problems. I believe this is a
known problem, and may still be a problem in CFMX 6.1. The best way
around it is to put your cfhttp call in a cffunction, then call that
function from within your loop.
Jim Davis wrote:
But, my point is, that if IE weren't around then alternative methods would
be employed to trick people into installing SpyWare. Do you really think
that the FireFox extensions architecture will NOT be used for spyware?
It will not be used for spyware that cripples Windows. It
I noticed that with CFMX 6.1 Updater 1 that when I map a website to a
CFMX instance, the extensions mxml and swf are added in IIS now. Both
point to the jrun dll. mxml extension is a surprise, but no issue.
The swf mapping to jrun dll is. Anyone else seeing this?
DK
--
Douglas Knudsen
Spike wrote:
I would bet that a simple firefox extension that did a lookup of known
URLs for spyware before anything is downloaded would make a significant
difference.
I doubt a list of URLs could keep up. BotNet CCs now rotate by
the hour as a preventive measure and when they are taken
There is one major problem with the 6.1 drivers that I'm seeing on 9i
and 10g. When a deadlock occurs in Oracle, CF does not throw an error.
Instead it waits partiently for Oracle to respond... which it never
does... hung thread!
This can be avoided with careful programming. Unfortunately I just
Paul,
Sorry to hear that someone took the look'n'feel of one your sites. However,
due to the inhereint nature of the web - it would be impossible to secure your
site against this - automated or manual stealing. It is good though that
nobody can take your backend code - unless there is a
There would certainly be things that you couldn't keep up with, but
things like Kazaa don't tend to change their URL so often. Even the name
of the .exe would be a good step forward.
The purpose is not to try to completely stop malware from getting on the
computer, but to make the user aware
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:35:06 -0400, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is whether or not FireFox in mass use would reduce spyware -
I'm not sure it would. It very well might - I just don't know.
IE installs software without your consent - so yes it would reduce it
(using
Apache puts out a lot of security patches. Those don't get as
much press as IIS. I might be hard to say whether Apache or
IIS gets more patches. My gut feel is that Apache makes
patches available faster than Microsoft does for IIS but,
again, no hard evidence on my part...
In my
The DataSource service is not available.
This error still occurs to us every now and then, even with
CF 6.1 with the updater. Does anyone know why MM has not
bothered to fix the error?
I'm going through neo-query.xml now to attempt to find the
corruption (if that's where the problem
I'm writing a tag right now, and for some reason static initialisers
aren't working for me. Some background first:
The tag I'm writing interfaces with another server using some odd
bespoke protocol that the developers dreamt up. The protocol has a
variety of different message types, each of which
Greetings,
We posted this to the Blue Dragon list the other day but we thought we'd
post it here too in case anyone was interested.
Have a great day!
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
Original Message
Not sure if anyone here will be interested in this, but
The question is whether or not FireFox in mass use would
reduce spyware - I'm not sure it would. It very well might -
I just don't know.
The big difference between IE and Firefox is that IE allows ActiveX
components to install, and Firefox doesn't. Based on my understanding of how
Firefox
Im curious what content enhancements that you need, that only
IE can provide it? I have found FireFox to be by far the most
extensible and open browser there is.
There are lots of legitimate uses of ActiveX controls. ActiveX controls can
do literally anything once installed. Of course, this
and the couple of firefox security updates that they put out (and very quickly)
were do to the crappy os (xp) not the browser
the other big PITA is all the crap AOL installs even when u tell it NOT to, i
swear they are owned by m$ (like weatherbug), not to mention all thier popups
that install
I need to dynamically extract all the select option choices for each question
in a form. The number of choices for each question vary. I have a
multi-dimensional array that stores the questsions and choices for each test
like the array shown below:
How can I create one piece of code that can
I install firefox on almost everyones computer that I have to run
spybot on (non-techies). Then I change the Icon to the E and they
are none the wiser.
Thats classic, gave me a good chuckle on a Monday morning.
Thanks,
CC
x56927
How are the subclasses loaded? I suspect you need to load them
somewhere
Perhaps a bunch of Class.forName(the.package.TheClass) invocations
will be needed to actually load these up. (implicitly calling their
static intializers).
Dov
PS- if you use a hashtable instead of a hashmap , it is
do you have to store the data like that? an array of structs seems
like it would be easier to work with...
cfset testArray = arrayNew(1) /
cfset testArray[1] = structNew() /
cfset testArray[1].testNumber = 1 /
cfset testArray[1].answers = arrayNew(1) /
cfset testArray[1].answers[1] = choice 1 /
Yeah, that's great until they call the helpdesk or someone comes in
behind you to support it and can't figure out what the heck is going on.
Funny as crap, but a pain for support.
John
-Original Message-
From: Casey C Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:25
I went to my Dads house the other day (upper management type), to my
surprise he was running firefox,
Ha! That's funny, same happened with my old man. He called me up and
asked, whats this about firefox?, so he's using it now.
As for our corporate sites we're now seeing ~10% mozilla on our
Lewis - thanks! you've been extremly hepful. I look forward to hearing more
about your cfx tag.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: paypal API
Mark A Kruger wrote:
What about the
Lewis,
This whole API is a first-run in a lot of ways. They've done a good job of
providing lots of documents - but not a lot of useful samples and they've
overlooked some obvious stuff.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06,
and the couple of firefox security updates that they put out (and very
quickly) were do to the crappy os (xp) not the browser
the other big PITA is all the crap AOL installs even when u tell it
NOT to, i swear they are owned by m$ (like weatherbug), not to mention
all thier popups that
Does anyone have a good technique they use to make a fixed width variable
to insert into a text file?
For example I have an order number, it can be 3,4,5 or 6 characters long
Lets say:
123
1234
12345
123456
...and I need to format them at 9 characters long by inserting 0's in the
beginning:
I think #numberFormat(num,0)# should do the trick.
-dbk
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Waris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Fixed Width variable question.
Does anyone have a good technique they use to make a fixed width
Use numberformat
#numberformat(num1,0)#
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:50:01 -0500, Jeff Waris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a good technique they use to make a fixed width variable
to insert into a text file?
For example I have an order number, it can be 3,4,5 or 6 characters
Maybe I didn't explain this good enough... LOL Its Monday
I know that I can format a number with numberformat... I'd like to apply
this to text variables as well...
Lets say I am interested in doing this...
123
1234
12345
123456
Setting them so they would be
123
1234
12345
Bert Dawson wrote:
We're not using client variables (default storage in cfadmin=none,
clientManagement=No, no DSNs are configured to use client variables,
or have the tables in them).
Are you sure the username is the one that is used from CF then?
How would you suggest i use a manual
I think you can use CFTABLE/CFCOLUMN for ascii formatted tabular data.
Haven't played with that since CF 3.x/4 days, but check the docs.
-dbk
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Waris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fixed Width
RJustify(string, length)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Waris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 1:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fixed Width variable question.
Maybe I didn't explain this good enough... LOL Its Monday
I know that I can format a
Can someone explain to me what CFMX needs MSVCP60.dll for? I've
inherited yet another server to manage and when any of the instance
are started it throws 2 errors saying that MSVCP60.dll is missing.
The instances seem to run fine without them, however I am having
problems with JRun clustering.
That did the trick... Thanks!
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 2:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fixed Width variable question.
RJustify(string, length)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Waris
Hi all,
First let me say this is on an intranet... (the names have been changed
to protect ME!)
My original server was myServer.mycompany.com with a vanity urls of
vurl.mycompany.com, vurl2.mycompany.com. When ever I used cfmail and
set the to=test #chr(60)[EMAIL PROTECTED](62)#, you would
I saw this problem with CFMX 6.1 Enterprise. I just did a fresh install
of the J2EE type for a server mode. After I applied the updater and the
hotfixes/jrun updater I had these mappings also.
It broke our flash. I had to get rid of the .swf maping to make it work
again!
Steve
-Original
you're right it not but its probably the biggest one.
i cant get my mom off aol but at least i got her using firefox
my biggest puter prob of course is with m$ and even though they now have the
installs set to no doesnt do much good.
my biggest problem from day 1 with xp is that i have all the
George,
If it's a bug in the code, then there's not much you can do from a technical
viewpoint. However, you could start using a cached directory content system.
Load the contents of the user's entire directory structure into a memory
structure and use that for displaying information to the
Thanks, Charlie.
I'll try that.
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:186345
Archives:
Hi all,
I have a HTML Form, which has couple of input fields and in the middle of the
form I have a drop down menu, when user select the item from the drop down menu
the page refresh.
Prblem is If user has entered half of the form, those fileds are gone after
refresh, what is the way aroung
gone means when user fill up the form and he change the dropdown value form
refresh and the value that user types is gone.
Hi all,
I have a HTML Form, which has couple of input fields and in the middle
of the form I have a drop down menu, when user select the item from
the drop down
The problem is I can't use IsDefined of each and every form field. Those are 97
form fields. Can't check each and every field that if its IsDefined then use
the same value.
Is there any easiest way to preserve the form fields??
gone means when user fill up the form and he change the
Hi All,
I'm looking to add a timezone preference to a reporting tool. It
defaults to our current timezone of EST but allows the user to adjust to
their timezone accordingly. All records displayed on screen (or
downloaded) from that point on, the date is adjusted to reflect their
timezone
Why does the page need to refresh when they make a selection w/ the
dropdown? (You may be able to use JS to accomplish the same task without
refreshing the page...)
-Original Message-
From: Asim Manzur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:35:06 -0400, Jim Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is whether or not FireFox in mass use would reduce
spyware -
I'm not sure it would. It very well might - I just don't know.
IE installs software without your consent - so yes it would reduce
it
if you're reloading the page, that's expected behavior.
you'd need to actually submit the form and either save the values into
the session scope, or submit the form to itself to have the values
available...then use those values in the 'value' attribute of the
input fields.
you'd also likely
Mark A Kruger wrote:
Lewis,
This whole API is a first-run in a lot of ways. They've done a good job of
providing lots of documents - but not a lot of useful samples and they've
overlooked some obvious stuff.
-Mark
Agreed. The old phrases moving target and left hand not knowing what
the
ok, so I'm not alone in this. sounds like some sort of bug, unless
the future hrun dll is to handle swf extensions, eh? broke my flash
stuff too.
now, where's that bug submit page at again
DK
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:00:24 -0500, DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw this
Katz, Dov B (IT) wrote:
How are the subclasses loaded? I suspect you need to load them
somewhere
Perhaps a bunch of Class.forName(the.package.TheClass) invocations
will be needed to actually load these up. (implicitly calling their
static intializers).
Yup, I realised the same myself.
I
Before we officially claim a browser war, let's check the numbers a bit.
Number of internet users (worldwide): 934 million
Source: http://www.clickz.com/stats/web_worldwide/
Number of Firefox downloads: 8.5 million
Source: Mozilla.org
If those numbers are within the ballpark, it follows that AT
I was developing CF apps well before they came up with their CFLOGIN scheme,
and I still have yet to take time to investigate it much.
Do you all make use of these built in authentication tags? Are there
shortcomings I should be aware of that negate any gains? I'm intrigued by
the ability
Hello,
This is not something I've done before so I thought I would ask first.
I'm looking for a way to set a session variable with a simple cfform
tag and no submit button.
cfform name=setSiteType
Site Type: Flash input name=session.siteType type=radio
value=Flash checked Htmlinput
Steve,
By the way, where do I see where it is logged as a bug? Also when you
mean a cached directory content system, do you mean write some module
for Apache that does all you describe? I am not sure I understand.
This Monday/end-of-year denseness gets me sometimes.
George
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004
Do keep in mind that a LOT of users don't own a computer, and rely on
shared access, such as libraries, schools, community centers, and/or
work. I personally have made 3 downloads of Firefox, but I have it
running on at least 10 computers, which are used by a total of 8-10
different people.
So
Do keep in mind that a LOT of users don't own a computer, and rely on
shared access, such as libraries, schools, community centers, and/or
work. I personally have made 3 downloads of Firefox, but I have it
running on at least 10 computers, which are used by a total of 8-10
different people.
So
Starmark Research is conducting a survey of software developers for
one of our clients.
The survey is very brief and requires only a few minutes to complete.
All participants are eligible to win a 20GB Apple iPod. The winner
will be randomly selected and contacted on December 17, 2004.
To
Easy now.. you cant claim that Barney's numbers are FALSE.. anectdotal maybe.
The numer of users and number of downloads dont really match I agree,
just take it to an IT department etc.
besides.. check the usage of firefox in sites more like as that is the
important part!
MD
On Mon, 06 Dec
I agree with barney. That's like counting the number of people that
use windows by counting the number of copies sold in stores. That
would leave out OEMs and people who steal it (illegal, but windows
users none the less).
Browser stats are the best bet - looking at your own logs is probally
I would argue that my numbers, while definitely anectodal, are just as
valid a set to base a conclusion on. The only real numbers are web
usage stats, as reported by your web server logs. And those are only
relevant for the site they were recorded on.
cheers,
barneyb
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004
Before we officially claim a browser war, let's check the numbers a
bit.
Number of internet users (worldwide): 934 million
Source: http://www.clickz.com/stats/web_worldwide/
Number of Firefox downloads: 8.5 million
Source: Mozilla.org
If those numbers are within the ballpark, it
Can anybody tell me how to get the date of the last sunday of any given
month and year? I want to be able to pass in a month and year and get
the date of that last sunday.
Thanks,
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community
Good point Stace,
Not all places have daylight savings, and they dont all change on the
same day the USA does. And south of the equator, they change in the
opposite direction to the USA.
The closer a place is to the equator, the less is the difference in
daylight hours between the
The point was not to call Barney a liar. Perhaps I worded it incorrectly. What
I was referring to is assertion that a LOT of users don't have a computer.
Where's that data coming from? And what's a LOT?
My apologies to Barney if it appeared as a personal attack. It was not the
intention.
I
Irvin,
I think the point is not about actual usage per se - it's more about
momentum. Firefox does appear to be gaining more momentum than any recent
offering - and getting far more press in the trade rags. Adoption in Europe
is outpacing the US. As has been mentioned here - the real test is
I'm a bit proponent of CFLOGIN, however it is a bit tricky and is,
unfortuinately, broken now. I used to recommend it to folks, and now I
recommend against it. There is a bug (in the process of being logged)
that involves the session based version of CFLOGIN that was introduced
in CFMX 6.1. That
Try this. It's untested, but it should be close. Basically it creates
the first day of the month, advanced one month, and backsup one day
(to get hte last day of the target month). Then checks the day of the
week, and subtracts an appropriate number of days.
d = createDate(url.year, url.month,
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
