have
always dodged the performance question, saying their primary goal is
correctness, not performance.
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow
DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
No, it isn't.
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7
-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2005 16:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
We argue about this continuously at work. I know for a fact that my site
performs much better on Apache. I know this because I've had the same
site running on the same server
The reason I asked specifically about ColdFusion MX 7 is because either
yesterday or the day before that (I can't remember), I could not connect to the
site twice. It says it could not connect to JRUN. I didn't write down the
message, but I believe it also gave me the JRUN version. After
No doubt IIS - it is quite possibly the crappiest Web Server
there is.
That's simply ridiculous. IIS is as good as any other web server running on
Windows when it comes to performance - in fact, practically any web server
is sufficient to use all the available bandwidth serving static files,
Yep, we found this. We are an MS house no messing: CF does
run faster on Apache no arguments. If you run IIS in an
Enterprise setup you will begin to suffer.
First, I haven't found this to be true on Windows. Second, if CF does run
faster on one than another, is that because of the web
I think you could say that any web server is crappy if not properly
configured! Just because you drive a race car does not mean it's tuned
properly.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX 7 slow?
Yep, we found this. We are an MS house no messing: CF does
run faster on Apache no arguments. If you run IIS in an
Enterprise setup you will begin to suffer.
First, I haven't
I can't doubt that what you say is true. It makes perfect sense.
However, I've tested it on my site several times. If I walk
across the room right now and stop IIS and start Apache, I
will see a positive impact on the performance of my CF site.
I just can't do that because of my
If cfwack been released, why does Amazon.com say the estimated ship date is
May 29 2005? I see the advanced book is not yet out but I get the late date
on both books...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 12:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:20:59 -0600, Jillian Koskie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I still download ColdFusion MX 6?
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusionmx61/downloads/
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/
Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/
Breeze Me! --
Jillian Koskie wrote:
Can I still download ColdFusion MX 6?
I only have a subscription that takes me up to MX 6, and I need to
install it on a remote server where I don't have access to the disk
drives to use my CD.
CFMX 6.1 was a free upgrade from CFMX 6.0, so you would be entitled to
6.1.
:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: java.lang.ClassCastException
Thanks
Steff
-Message d'origine-
De : Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : Thursday, November 25, 2004 5:47 PM
À : CF-Talk
Objet : Re: Coldfusion mx and xml
I assume you are using a valid stylesheet, I
the [XSL] text.
javax.xml.transform.TransformerConfigurationException:
javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: java.lang.ClassCastException
Thanks
Steff
-Message d'origine-
De : Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : Thursday, November 25, 2004 5:47 PM
À : CF-Talk
Objet : Re: Coldfusion mx
I assume you are using a valid stylesheet, I made one with the
fragment you posted:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-1?
xsl:stylesheet version=1.0
xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform;
xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
I'm not sure this helps but may be related with how Windows manages
memory
I found that Windows doesn't really USE all the RAM we give it very
much - that's why it doesn't seem to care.I experienced this with my
laptop - it was fine under Windows but when I started using VMWare and
had a few
IIRC, -XX:MaxPermSize=256m sets the max size of the perm generation.
Wouldn't -Xmx640m set the max size?
http://www.petefreitag.comand http://www.bpurcell.org/blog has some
good stuffs on this.There is a macromedia tech note on performance
too...I don't have that handy though.
Doug
On Tue, 05
New Development:
I tried running the memory usage stats script Pete Freitag describes
here:
http://www.petefreitag.com/item/115.cfm
And it displays this info:
Free Allocated Memory: 250mb
Total Memory Allocated: 253mb
Max Memory Available to JVM: 253mb
% of Free Allocated Memory: 99%
% of
: ColdFusion MX 6.1 Enterprise as JRun J2EE EAR connected to
IIS
IIRC, -XX:MaxPermSize=256m sets the max size of the perm generation.
Wouldn't -Xmx640m set the max size?
http://www.petefreitag.comand http://www.bpurcell.org/blog has some
good stuffs on this.There is a macromedia tech note on performance
,
Thanks Doug!I just realized I got the link to Pete Freitag's site from
your email.Was wondering how I pulled that one up. :)
Chris Peters
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX
CF Administrator log file viewer doesn't work for you?
-nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/
Dave Phillips wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a good replacement log viewer for CF MX ?All the ones I
find are for older versions of CF and don't take into account the complexity
of the exception.log.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX Log Viewer
CF Administrator log file viewer doesn't work for you?
-nathan strutz
http://www.dopefly.com/
Dave Phillips wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a good replacement log viewer for CF MX ?All the ones I
find are for older versions of CF and don't take
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:23 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a (fairly beefy) server sitting upstairs working as a router for the cable connection we've got. I thought to myself, why don't I set this up as a dev server for my CFMX apps? The problem is, it's a SuSe
it's pretty easy, i'd never user nix before and i got it going, rh9,
mysql, cfmx! The installer is pretty good,
jb.
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:23 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a (fairly beefy) server sitting upstairs working as a router for the cable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it'd be handy to know if CFMX suse mysql apache actually works!
SuSE 7.2,7.3, and 8.x are listed as supported Operating Systems for
ColdFusion MX, so if your running one of those versions it shuldn't be
too hard to get working. If your running a different version,
I would NOT install on a router...seems ripe for intrusions... but
then that's just me.
Gonz
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:23 +0100
Subject: Coldfusion MX on SuSe? (And ideally MySQL...)
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:51:51 -0700, Gonzo Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would NOT install on a router...seems ripe for intrusions... but
then that's just me.
Gonz
Depending on what this machine is doing, I would have to agree with
this. When you say that your SUSE machine is a router, what
it automatically reverts to a single IP address developers edition after 30 days
hence, coldfusion is free to dev on
-- Original Message --
From: Steff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Thu, 8 Jul 2004 09:49:45 +0200
Hello
Something
I believe its single IP (localhost) and one or two other IP's allowed.It
is full featured for development purposes.
_
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 July 2004 08:53
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Coldfusion mx server trial version
it automatically reverts to a single IP address
Keep an eye on this page,
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/tn17883.htm
jb.
Check in cfadmin, system info java class path section to see which .jar
hotfixes you have applied
-Original Message-
From: Bobby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2004 01:49
To:
The Security Zone is where you can find all Macromedia product security patches, bulletins, recommedation best-practive lock-down guides, etc.
Check it out and use it often.It's also directly linked from the CF Administrator Home Page for handy reference.
http://www.macromedia.com/security
Enterprise is sold in two-CPU chunks, so the first license will cover a one
or two cpu system.You'll need two licenses for a 3 or 4 CPU system, etc.
-Original Message-
From: brob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coldfusion MX
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Application Server (6.1) problem
We have exactly the same problem on our production server, but not on our
dev server and staging server...
Configurations are identical... (Windows 2000, Apache2, SQL Server on the
separate server)
We need to restart the server to restart
starting the installation
(as it does for MDAC 2.6 SP2)?
Benoit Hediard
www.benorama.com
-Message d'origine-
De : chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy : jeudi 30 octobre 2003 15:32
: CF-Talk
Objet : Re: ColdFusion MX Application Server (6.1) problem
After we tried everything to fix
If Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 runtime is mandatory, why the
installation procedure does not check if it is installed
before starting the installation (as it does for MDAC 2.6
SP2)?
In my experience, it does check for the existence of the runtime, but I
imagine all sorts of things can go
Will the server start up if you remove all the datasources from your
configuration?That's probably the first thing I'd test as it will tell
you right then and there if it's a named datasource that's your problem.
-Novak
-Original Message-
From: chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The ColdFusion MX Application Server (6.1) service (which
co-exists with CF5 on our local Windows 2000 server) is not
able to successfully restart. I got the following error
message when I tried to restart it ...
You might find it helpful to try starting it as an application, using the
We have exactly the same problem on our production server, but not on our
dev server and staging server...
Configurations are identical... (Windows 2000, Apache2, SQL Server on the
separate server)
We need to restart the server to restart ColdFusion... (hopefully, we do it
very rarely)
Nothing in
Strange indeed. Spotted these two links yesterday so maybe they will help:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/cfmx61_sqlserver_c
pu.htm
and
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/cfmx_hang_issues.h
tm
HTH
Peter Tilbrook
ColdFusion Applications
Is this running on Jrun?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 September 2003 03:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX 6.1 Caching
Yes Sir, I did...
Anyone else have any ideas?
At 08:01 PM 9/23/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Subject
Could it be a proxy caching issue? We had terrible troubles like this until we added
this-
!--- disable proxy cache, allow browser cache ---
cfheader name=cache-control value=private
Chris Norloff
-- Original Message --
From: Jeff Houser [EMAIL
did you uncheck Save Class Files in the CFAdmin tool? Yeah, this is new to 6.1..IIRC.
just a thought
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 3:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion MX 6.1 Caching
Hi all,
I upgraded a
Yes Sir, I did...
Anyone else have any ideas?
At 08:01 PM 9/23/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Subject: ColdFusion MX 6.1 Caching
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:56:45 -0500
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=messagesthreadid=27363forumid=4#138211
did you
Exciting stuff! Thanks Tim!
- Calvin
- Original Message -
From: Tim Buntel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:35 AM
Subject: ColdFusion MX Performance Brief now available
Hello All -
I'm pleased to inform you that the new Performance
I imagine part of the reason why Macromedia labs are missing
applications that show no gains or even negative gains is the same
reason they missed them with CFMX; Macromedia provides no IP protection
for the applications shared. It is quite likely that a fair number of
complex and
Are those quick stats for the standard implementation of for J2EE?
I've upgraded to 6.1 on Win 2K Advanced Server using standard implementation
and am not seeing any speed improvement over MX??
How about others? any noticeable difference?
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of
Right click on any of the culrpti documents, go to properties then
security tab then advanced button at the bottom... When the next window
opens, it will show the owners for that document. Make sure the appropriate
owners are listed. If not, highlight the documents and correct the owners.
This
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion MX and Microsoft Word problems...
Right click on any of the culrpti documents, go to properties then
security tab then advanced button at the bottom... When the next window
opens, it will show the owners for that document. Make sure the appropriate
owners
great and is just as fast.
Cool Beans.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Sacramento, CA
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 8:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Oracle JDBC driver
Ok, this one is beyond
Ok, this one is beyond me to figure out. I'm wondering if it's
some kind of
bug in the JDBC driver or something.
What JDBC Driver are you using? Try the Oracle Supplied JDBC TYPE IV NATIVE
Driver from Oracle's website. That should do the trick.
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From:
Excellent! That worked, thanks for sending that link
Cheers
Allan
--- Christine Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Allan,
Take a look at this article
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/configure_web_server_option.htm
and make the registry key change. You should then be
I suggest you reboot, sometimes the ANT script can fail or be cached which
screws up things.
Also, what Windows Version is this?
-Original Message-
From: ColdFusion Programmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2003 10:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coldfusion MX installer problem -
then save the registry key before you reboot and reapply afterwards.
-Original Message-
From: ColdFusion Programmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2003 10:10
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coldfusion MX installer problem - Please help
If I reboot my box, I'll have to again modify my
Hi Allan,
Take a look at this article
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/configure_web_server_option.htm
and make the registry key change. You should then be prompted to co-exist.
Christine
-Original Message-
From: Allan Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
issues with SQL
Server alone and MX.
-Original Message-
From: Ezine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 23 March 2003 8:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Still crashing after updater. *pulling hair
out*
Thanks for your response Jim
LOL, I know
You mentioned that you applied Updater 2 yesterday. Have you tried the
newly-released Updater 3? We've found significant improvements across the
board -- especially with respect to stability and performance.
Also, your setup:
There is at least 250MB of free physical ram...
on a Win2K Server
-Original Message-
From: Ezine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 2:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion MX Still crashing after updater. *pulling
hair out*
Coldfusion is set to time out all requests after 9 milliseconds(90
seconds).. and yet..
yesterday(causing the CF
overload). Perhaps the CFFORM tag has some problems?
Thanks again
-Zine
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Still crashing after updater. *pulling hair
out
-Original Message-
From: Ezine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 4:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Still crashing after updater.
*pulling hair out*
Thanks for your response Jim
LOL, I know..definitely odd.. I appreciate you
LOL...check the archives from last week..tonnes of unhappy/happy stories ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Macromedia Associate Partner
Well -- I'm able to connect to the named instance using the ODBC socket, but
damn... that shouldn't be the _only_ way to accomplish this.
Okay, I found this article:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q3
13225
Which says that to connect to a named instance of SQL
Oh duh! Nevermind... cfmx uses the proper connection string syntax if you
just use the machine name and the port number in the port number field ...
In my defense, it was different in CF 5. ;P
Well -- I'm able to connect to the named instance using
the ODBC socket, but
damn... that shouldn't
Thanks for everyone's help on this. The answer came courtesy of Jon
Moneymaker.
http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/messageview.cfm?catid=2threa
did=455161
In short, don't install CFMX on a virgin box without having altered the
Default web site directory in IIS (even if you move it,
Did you have a beta installed at some stage? Check the registry for the
keys which start the services and verify they are pointing to the correct
folder for the CF services.
N
-Original Message-
From: Aidan Whitehall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 September 2002 09:43
To: CF-Talk
Did you have a beta installed at some stage? Check the registry for
the
keys which start the services and verify they are pointing to the
correct
folder for the CF services.
It was a *completely* fresh install of everything, starting with wiping
the partition and reformatting with NTFS.
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX service won't start at boot
Did you have a beta installed at some stage? Check the registry for
the
keys which start the services and verify they are pointing to the
correct
folder for the CF services.
It was a *completely* fresh install of everything, starting
This may be oversimplifying, but have you considered using a dsnless connection in the
necessary code
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schoby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coldfusion MX Pro - Linux and DB2 (AS/400)
I'm not a programmer, just the server admin trying to set up the Data
Source.
So, I guess the answer to that question would be ..no :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/20/02 11:27AM
This may be oversimplifying, but have you considered using a dsnless
connection in the necessary code
This may be oversimplifying, but have you considered using a
dsnless connection in the necessary code
I don't think you can use DSNless connections in CF MX.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
: dream :: design ::
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: Coldfusion MX Pro - Linux and DB2 (AS/400)
I'm not a programmer, just the server admin trying to set up the Data
Source.
So, I guess the answer to that question would be ..no :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/20/02 11:27AM
This may
Jeff,
I am currently looking into the same problem that you are running into.
I have found that DB2 Connect provides JDBC access to the AS400.
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/db2/db2connect/
The personal edition runs $237 and the enterprise runs $2500.
You can call IBM at 1-800-426-2255
I
I am just not getting this.
What happens when I have a server that has JRun 4 and CFMX Pro? Are there
2 separate JRun installations?
I take it that the ColdFusion MX for JRun product is actually an unbundled
ColdFusion MX Server Enterprise. Is that correct?
Thanks,
Cary
At 10:14 AM
: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX for J2EE is Available!
I am just not getting this.
What happens when I have a server that has JRun 4 and CFMX Pro? Are there
2 separate JRun installations?
I take it that the ColdFusion MX for JRun product is actually
septembre 2002 19:39
À : CF-Talk
Objet : RE: ColdFusion MX for J2EE is Available!
It's a separate product. Instead of CFMX Pro you'd purchase CFMX for J2EE
which gets deployed on a J2EE server. CFMX is actually just and application
that leverages all the goodies on the J2EE server...
You can do stuff
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX for J2EE is Available!
Indeed :
- ColdFusion MX Server Enterprise Edition (Full) = $4,999/server
- JRun (US $899/server) + ColdFusion MX for Macromedia JRun
($3,399/CPU) =
$4,298/CPU
So if you plan to have only one CPU/Server, it is much better
It droped my score as well but i didnt study CMFX stuff to
take the test... and havent been coding any CFMX stuff..
but this is what i thought.
The same was true for myself.
1. Fairly ok Test.
2. Some repeat questions.
3. Some questions code was the answer the next
question. what up
left as well...but i guess this is because it
wasnt a real test..and i wasnt loosing any money..if i didnt pass...haha
Joe
- Original Message -
From: S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX
Where can I take it?
- Original Message -
From: Ali Daniali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:10 PM
Subject: ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam
Hi Folks,
I just went through the ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam and was
wondering
From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Where can I take it?
It was an invitation-only thing. I don't remember what I did to get invited.
(Probably my employment by an Alliance Partner a few months ago.) The beta
period is over in any case.
Unfortunately you missed your opportunity. The beta ends some time tommorrow
and you would have had to have pre-registered to take it... I find it odd
that anyone would say it didn't feel like it really tested very deeply ...
I won't mention any specifics because they're covered by a non- It
ARGH!!! I hate hot-keys sometimes... send-mail I think is one feature
that should not get a hot-key...
In any event...
I find it odd that anyone would say it didn't feel like it really tested
very deeply ... I won't mention any specifics because they're covered by a
non-disclosure
Actually, the beta ends tonight... !
~Todd
At 05:48 PM 8/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Unfortunately you missed your opportunity. The beta ends some time tommorrow
and you would have had to have pre-registered to take it... I find it odd
that anyone would say it didn't feel like it really tested
I am going to take it tonight
-Original Message-
From: Ali Daniali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam
Hi Folks,
I just went through the ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam and was
wondering
Please tell me it didn't ask any DMX or RDS questions. I remember when I
took the first beta exam back in the day and had to deal with Studio and
RDS questions, which had nothing to do with CF programming.
Matt Liotta
President CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
V:
From: Ali Daniali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I just went through the ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam and was
wondering what others thought about it. I didn't feel like it really
tested very deeply. Maybe the real one will be more comprehensive and
harder. I had over 20 min left when
That would be a violation of the NDA!
(All CFML. Not even questions about server configuration.)
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam
Please tell me
I am going to take it tonight
-Original Message-
From: Ali Daniali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam
Hi Folks,
I just went through the ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam and was
Some people haven't taken the test yet.
Maybe you'd want to table this discussion. You also might want to check
what kind of NDA you may have signed about talking about this particular
exam.
Cheers,
t
**
Tyler M. Fitch
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX Certification Beta Exam
I am going to take it tonight
-Original Message-
From: Ali Daniali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject
oi Kurt!!
do those cfx's reference any other dll's? I've heard there is a problem with the
cfx's finding
other dlls
--
Critz
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
CFX_BotMaster Network=Efnet Channel=ColdFusion
Tuesday, August
Both of the tags only refer to one dll file
-Original Message-
From: Critter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX and CFX tags
oi Kurt!!
do those cfx's reference any other dll's? I've heard there is a problem
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:57:27 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote:
Both of the tags only refer to one dll file
I've found MX to have serious difficulties with COM, CFX and ADSI.
FYI.
Far as I recall the tag had no dependencies but it has been a couple
years. Hrm.
I get a internal server error when clicking on the link
-Kurt
-Original Message-
From: Lewis Sellers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 2:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX and CFX tags
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:57:27 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:31:47 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote:
I get a internal server error when clicking on the link
:) I guess you would wouldn't you. Oops.
Sec. Ok, I rezipped it. Just download off the freeware page as usual.
See if that works. I noticed the project file had MFC included
CONNECTSTRING is no longer supported in CFMX unfortunately, JDBC does
not support it. No one has come up with a good solution yet, although a
few are working on creative possibilities. That is one of the features
we had no choice but to remove in CFMX.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From:
Hey there, say I have an access database at
C:\items.mdb
How can I query this database WITHOUT ODBC in ColdFusion MX.
I've tried CFQUERY and typing in the path and file name in
the datasource attribute to no avail. The ConnectString
attribute didn't seem to help much either.
I
: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:33:53 -0400
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX - Querying without ODBC
Hey there, say I have an access database at
C:\items.mdb
How can I query this database WITHOUT ODBC in ColdFusion MX.
I've tried CFQUERY and typing in the path and file name in
the datasource
yeah.. decrypt the cfadministrator, steal the code for making/modifying
datasources, use that... cfregistry.
ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX - Querying without ODBC
Message-
From: Ken Beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:34:54 -0400
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX - Querying without ODBC
yeah.. decrypt the cfadministrator, steal the code for making/modifying
datasources, use that... cfregistry.
ken
-Original
Given that, what would you suggest? The situation is that I'm
faced with an access database whose name will change based on
user feedback. I suppose I could use the many CF_Datasource
options to create and modify ODBC Datasources on the fly,
however that seems like quite a bit to do, and
101 - 200 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
