Re: Windows Event Log

2007-09-21 Thread John Blayter
I don't know of a way to get it to have the application natively write to the windows event log. But you could write a simple VBS file that reads in the log files from CF and then posts the information into the windows event log using the LogEvent method in WSH. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sc

Re: Windows 2003 Service Pack 2 has been released

2007-03-15 Thread Steve Good
I have SP2 installed and running and haven't noticed anything bad. In fact, I was finally able to get Darwin Streaming Server up and running on it! Steve Good [EMAIL PROTECTED] Portal Hosting http://www.lanctr.com Paul Vernon wrote: > I didn't realise that it was coming out so soon and yet,

Re: Windows 2003 Service Pack 2 has been released

2007-03-15 Thread Jeff Coughlin
I installed it on several servers last weekend and so far everything is running great! (No crashes yet... crossing fingers :) ). On 3/15/07, Paul Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't realise that it was coming out so soon and yet, here it is! > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windows

RE: Windows 2003 Service Pack 2 has been released

2007-03-15 Thread Robert Rawlins - Think Blue
Ooooh, great stuff Paul, thanks for the heads up. I look forward to seeing your results. Rob -Original Message- From: Paul Vernon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2007 11:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: Windows 2003 Service Pack 2 has been released I didn't realise that it was coming ou

Re: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-05 Thread Larry Lyons
>Any have recommendations on software to use to load test websites? We want >to do some testing on our CMS. Right now we are windows only (IIS & MS SQL). > >Thanks in advance! > >jonese I've had pretty good experience with the Apache Jakarta project's jmeter, http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/. Wh

Re: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-04 Thread Ryan Stille
I've had good luck with OpenSTA. Its free and runs on Windows. You can get it from opensta.org. -Ryan CF WebTools http://ryan.cfwebtools.com ~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create pow

RE: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-04 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:08 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Windows Based Load testing? > > I've used the Ms Web Application Stress Tool before, its okay... > > http://support.micro

Re: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-04 Thread Tero Pikala
LoadRunner is good but expensive. Proper testing with it takes someone who really knows it well. Apache JMeter runs well in Windows and basics can be learned in half day. It's free and usually is my first choise. It uses rather unique terminology in my opinion, though. What it lacks is repor

Re: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-03 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
-Talk Sent: Sat Feb 03 05:01:27 2007 Subject: RE: Windows Based Load testing? This info is from a few years back, but Mercury Interactive's Load Runner was pretty good...we used that at one of my old jobs pretty extensively to tweak some efficiency out of our site. Eric -Original Me

RE: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-02 Thread Eric Roberts
This info is from a few years back, but Mercury Interactive's Load Runner was pretty good...we used that at one of my old jobs pretty extensively to tweak some efficiency out of our site. Eric -Original Message- From: jonese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 02 February 2007 10:03

RE: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-02 Thread Dave Watts
> Any have recommendations on software to use to load test > websites? We want to do some testing on our CMS. Right now we > are windows only (IIS & MS SQL). Your load testing can run on any platform; it doesn't matter that the servers to be tested run on Windows. Segue SilkPerformer and Mercur

Re: Windows Based Load testing?

2007-02-02 Thread Adrian
I've used the Ms Web Application Stress Tool before, its okay... http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231282 On 02/02/07, jonese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any have recommendations on software to use to load test websites? We want > to do some testing on our CMS. Right now we are windows only (I

RE: Windows Services Recovery Tab for ColdFusion

2006-11-28 Thread Dave Watts
> Has anyone had any experience with using the Recovery options > for a service on the ColdFusion service? I have a client who > has the recovery tab set to restart the service on First > Failure and he has been experiencing alot of restarts lately. > I'm thinking that maybe Windows 'thinks'

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-25 Thread loathe
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=228c3aaa Mad the boot.ini change and it worked. Sweet :) > -Original Message- > From: loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:10 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-25 Thread loathe
nstalled and running. > -Original Message- > From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:53 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Windows 2003 Server Install > > Did CF actually install? Or did it bomb out during the install? > > On 25/08/06, C

Re: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-25 Thread Andy Allan
2006 10:41 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install > > > > Bump bump, anyone? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-25 Thread Crow T Robot
I'll take one. Oh - what? > -Original Message- > From: loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 10:41 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install > > Bump bump, anyone? > > > -Original Message- > &

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-25 Thread loathe
Bump bump, anyone? > -Original Message- > From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:44 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install > > From the logs: > > Additional Notes: ERROR - standalone.xmljava.io

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-24 Thread Loathe
ROR Additional Notes: ERROR - JNDI port 2920 for server coldfusion is not active > -Original Message- > From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:13 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install > > > Huh,

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-24 Thread Loathe
Huh, because I did download the full one this time. > -Original Message- > From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:07 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Server Install > > > > First time ever doing this hosted

RE: Windows 2003 Server Install

2006-08-24 Thread Dave Watts
> First time ever doing this hosted and remote. > > I know there is some OS security setting in Windows 2003 that > was causing my CFMX 7 installs to fail, anyone know what I'm > talking about? > > I've been googling it and can't find what I mean. It's probably "Data Execution Prevention", and

RE: Windows NT Authentication

2006-08-11 Thread loathe
> -Original Message- > From: pak-Nash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:02 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Windows NT Authentication > > pak-Nash wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > I am new to coldfusion; I have successfully setup Mx coldf

RE: Windows NT Authentication

2006-08-11 Thread Dave Watts
> how to read user name and password from a prompt box that > display incase of Integrated windows authentication? If you're using integrated Windows authentication, you can configure Windows to record failed login attempts, and view those from the Security event log. Within your CF application, t

Re: Windows NT Authentication

2006-08-11 Thread pak-Nash
pak-Nash wrote: > > Hi folks, > I am new to coldfusion; I have successfully setup Mx coldfusion 7, IIS > 5.1. Now my client has requirement to incorporate windows NT > authentication to his site. What i did for this is just edit the site > settings in IIS and i choose the Integrated windows authen

RE: Windows registry issue

2005-08-29 Thread Gaulin, Mark
There may be a "max registry size" setting in the System part of the control panel (near where the pagefile size is set). Not sure if that'll help you though... 217 MB is freaking huge for a registry, and I don't think I've ever been able to get one to shrink before. Good luck. Mark

Re: Windows registry issue

2005-08-29 Thread Howie Hamlin
Scott, I have a procedure that you can use at your own risk. If you want the procedure then let me know off-list and I'll send it to you. Regards, Howie --- On Monday, August 29, 2005 4:50 PM, Scott Wolf scribed: --- > > That part is already done, sorry..should have mentioned that before. > E

RE: Windows registry issue

2005-08-29 Thread Scott Wolf
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Windows registry issue If possible, create a datasource in an SQL server and switch to that. That would at least get you up and running until you can clean the registry. howie --- On Monday, August 29, 2005 3:12 PM, Scott

Re: Windows registry issue

2005-08-29 Thread Howie Hamlin
If possible, create a datasource in an SQL server and switch to that. That would at least get you up and running until you can clean the registry. howie --- On Monday, August 29, 2005 3:12 PM, Scott Wolf scribed: --- > > It appears that one of my machines has been set for the last couple of > y

RE: Windows XP Tablet PC

2005-06-10 Thread Damien McKenna
Are there any graphical configuration editors for Apache on Windows? I'd imagine more people would use it if it had a simple GUI config for modifying basic things with a link to open the config file in an editor for heavier duty work. That and a graphical tool for automatically generating a self-s

RE: Windows XP Tablet PC

2005-06-10 Thread Dave Watts
> Anyone tried running CF on a Tablet PC OS? > > I dont know if the OS even has IIS. Yes, my laptop runs Windows XP Tablet PC Edition 2005 (that's just the latest version of the Tablet PC OS). It's Windows XP Professional, with additional functionality for tablet use (Ink, speech recognition, sof

RE: Windows XP Tablet PC - Definately Possible!

2005-06-10 Thread Jim Ruzicka
I have CF6.1 on a TabletPC. It works great. I built this cool app for sales people in the field to collect data. Take a look: http://www.digitalpasteup.com/dpu/ Once you are in, go to Bobs Auto Sales, version letter "D" Then, you can drag and drop vehicles from outside the grid to inside the g

Re: Windows XP Tablet PC

2005-06-10 Thread John Beynon
I'm 90% sure it will work, jb. On 6/10/05, chad gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not familiar with Media Centre either. So you can install CF MX on the > Tablet PC OS? > > > > > it'll be like Windows Media Centre - pretty much Windows XP Home > > under > > the hood. That can run IIS,

Re: Windows XP Tablet PC

2005-06-10 Thread chad gray
I am not familiar with Media Centre either. So you can install CF MX on the Tablet PC OS? > it'll be like Windows Media Centre - pretty much Windows XP Home > under > the hood. That can run IIS, ~| Find out how CFTicket can

Re: Windows XP Tablet PC

2005-06-10 Thread John Beynon
it'll be like Windows Media Centre - pretty much Windows XP Home under the hood. That can run IIS, jb. On 6/10/05, chad gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone tried running CF on a Tablet PC OS? > > I dont know if the OS even has IIS. > > I would like to purchase a Tablet PC, but if i can't d

Re: Windows NT error number 1450

2005-05-04 Thread Stephen Moretti
Terry Troxel wrote: >Anybody know of a solution to stop this error >While doing a file upload? > >Error Occurred While Processing Request >Error Diagnostic Information >Error writing data from web server to the ColdFusion >Application Server. >Windows NT error number 1450 occurred. > > Open a w

RE: Windows NT error number 1450

2005-05-04 Thread Micha Schopman
This error usually occurs either, when the windows registry has reached its maximum capacity storing client variables, or when the server memory is insufficient to buffer a file upload. Are you uploading large files? If so, increasing memory might help. Micha Schopman Project Managr Modern Media,

RE: windows 2003 server with CF. Remove CF capabilities from one site??

2005-03-21 Thread Troy Montour
Thanks Jim, That's what I figured but wanted to make sure :) Thank You Troy Montour -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:42 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: windows 2003 server with CF. Remove CF capabilities from one

RE: windows 2003 server with CF. Remove CF capabilities from one site??

2005-03-21 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Troy Montour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:22 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: windows 2003 server with CF. Remove CF capabilities from one > site?? > > Hello everyone, > > I want to make sure I do this correctly. Basically on our ser

RE: Windows 2003 Error

2004-09-23 Thread Jeff Chastain
other doesn't ... each running the same software and versions. Thanks for the help. -- Jeff   _   From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:46 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Error > Sorry, this is a really off topic .NET box, no CFMX. 

RE: Windows 2003 Error

2004-09-23 Thread Dave Watts
> Sorry, this is a really off topic .NET box, no CFMX.  The > ISAPI filters installed are Netegrity's SiteMinder Web Agent > and ASP.NET_1.1.4322.947. >   > I was just hoping somebody familiar with server support might > have some clue. Well, I'm sure there's no problem with the ASP.NET stuff o

RE: Windows 2003 Error

2004-09-23 Thread Jeff Chastain
ECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:26 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Windows 2003 Error > Interesting ... the list cut off the last half of the post.   > Lets try this again. >   > Event Viewer Info: >   > Event Type:    Error > Event Source:    W3SVC-WP > Event

RE: Windows 2003 Error

2004-09-23 Thread Dave Watts
> Interesting ... the list cut off the last half of the post.   > Lets try this again. >   > Event Viewer Info: >   > Event Type:    Error > Event Source:    W3SVC-WP > Event Category:    None > Event ID:    2267 > Date:    9/23/2004 > Time: 9:42:56 AM > User:    N/A > Computer:    PT-WS1 > Des

RE: Windows 2003 Error

2004-09-23 Thread Jeff Chastain
Interesting ... the list cut off the last half of the post.  Lets try this again. Event Viewer Info: Event Type:    Error Event Source:    W3SVC-WP Event Category:    None Event ID:    2267 Date:    9/23/2004 Time: 9:42:56 AM User:    N/A Computer:    PT-WS1 Description: Raw ISAPI Filter

RE: Windows 2003 Error

2004-09-23 Thread Dave Watts
> I am getting the following error in Windows 2003 and it shuts > down the IIS web services until I manually go restart them.   > I have searched everywhere I can think of and cannot find a > resolution to this.  Has anybody seen this error or have any > idea how I could fix it? >   > This error

Re: windows, services, and the JMC

2004-09-22 Thread Nathan Strutz
Douglas Knudsen wrote: > ah, ok.  I actually have 4 servers running, Default, Admin, CF, and > another CF named Portal.  So 4 servers running.  If I use a combo of > the JMC and the services MMC I can end up with 5 or more jrun.exe > processes. I would ditch the default server, unless you use it.

Re: windows, services, and the JMC

2004-09-22 Thread Douglas Knudsen
the custom ones defined via jrunsvc cmd? OT: Damn gmail is low as kaywrap today!  I have a couple invites if someone reads this.  emil me DIRECTLY only though. Doug - Original Message - From: Nathan Strutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:54:15 -0700 Subject: Re: w

Re: windows, services, and the JMC

2004-09-22 Thread Nathan Strutz
Yes, this is normal behavior. I suggest using the services panel to start and stop your server, unless you just happen to be in the JMC and just want to restart your server. This way, the services panel doesn't get confused as to what is and is not running. Also, when you say you have 2 jrun.ex

Re: Windows Media Scripting

2004-08-27 Thread Deanna Schneider
Doesn't it say that the duration has to go with the swf entry? You've got it with the wmv entry - Original Message - From: "Burns, John D" > Has anyone dealt with windows media scripting?  I'm trying to figure out > how to create a windows media file that will play and then at the en

RE: Windows groups

2004-07-22 Thread Dawson, Michael
ieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:18 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Windows groups Simon Whittaker wrote: > > If I am authenticating a user with Windows Authentication in IIS - I > know that I can get the user name with the cgi.remote_user variable > but is

Re: Windows groups

2004-07-22 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Simon Whittaker wrote: > > If I am authenticating a user with Windows Authentication in IIS - I > know that I can get the user name with the cgi.remote_user variable > but is there any way for me to find out what windows groups the user > is a member of? "net user " should tell you. Jochem [Tod

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Greg.Morphis
ssage- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:08 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Windows NT Error 2 > Only problem is that the file exists.. > D:\wwwroot\Advantage\eCount\files\alltelrewards_8148_070604 > _103913.txt does gzip take a path like this? Yes,

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Greg.Morphis
Dave thanks, this corrected the problem -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Windows NT Error 2 > Anyone familiar with this error as it pertains to running > gzip.exe on the server using >

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Dave Watts
> Only problem is that the file exists.. > D:\wwwroot\Advantage\eCount\files\alltelrewards_8148_070604 > _103913.txt does gzip take a path like this? Yes, it should take any valid file path on a local partition. Out of curiosity, though, what exactly are you trying to do? If you want to deliver g

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Greg.Morphis
-Talk Subject: RE: Windows NT Error 2 use the command "net helpmsg 2" Which gives you "The system cannot not find the file specified" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:25 AM > To:

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Dave Watts
> Anyone familiar with this error as it pertains to running > gzip.exe on the server using > DATETIME 07/06/04 10:19:53 > DETAIL Windows NT error 2 occurred. > DIAGNOSTICS Cannot execute GZIP.EXE Windows NT error 2 > occurred. I suspect that gzip.exe isn't in your PATH environment variable for

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Marlon Moyer
use the command "net helpmsg 2" Which gives you "The system cannot not find the file specified" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:25 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Windows NT Error 2 > > Anyone familiar with this erro

RE: Windows NT Error 2

2004-07-06 Thread Ryan Duckworth
Your path is wrong.  NT Error 2 means wrong path... Try outputting the path. Ryan Duckworth Macromedia ColdFusion Certified Professional Uhlig Communications 10983 Granada Lane Overland Park, KS 66207 (913) 754-4272 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Windows file synchronizer?

2004-06-15 Thread Mark Drew
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:166683---I must say that I never new Britney Spears was also a coldfusion developer. now that is amazing! [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: Windows file synchronizer?

2004-06-15 Thread Britney Spears
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:166680---We use "SureSynch". Works great! On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:06:49 -0400, Burns, John D wrote: >Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:166673 >--- >I have 2 servers that have the same app running on them and people >up

RE: Windows file synchronizer?

2004-06-15 Thread Mark W. Breneman
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:166675---We use MirrorFolder  http://www.techsoftpl.com/backup/ and we love it.  It also has the ability to zip the contents of the folder for archiving. Mark W. Breneman -Cold Fusion Developer -Network Administrator   Vivid Media   [EMAIL P

RE: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-22 Thread Steven Erat
> From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am *guessing* that CF5 will run on W2k3 server but, I know that it will > not install correctly and register the ISAPIs for .cfm in IIS 6. > > I would highly advise upgrading to CFMX 6.1 if CF5 is not officially > supported on W2k3 server, if

RE: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-20 Thread Dave Watts
> Ok, our old Dell server needs replacing so we bought a new > beast with Windows Server 2003. I installed our CF Server > 4.5.1 and then the CF 5 Server update, which had problems > finishing. Are there some compatibility issues? Is CF 6.2 > something I can download and use instead. Any help i

RE: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-20 Thread Dave Koehler
Nope, won't get involved there. Thought about it though. lol, dave -Original Message- From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 5:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Windows Server 2003 Why don't you put in a bid for the copy that is up fo

RE: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-20 Thread Ray Champagne
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:58 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Windows Server 2003 > > >I am *guessing* that CF5 will run on W2k3 server but, I know that it will >not install correctly and register the ISAPIs for .cfm in IIS 6. > >I would highly adv

RE: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-20 Thread Dave Koehler
Thanks Mark, that's kind of where we're headed. -Original Message- From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Windows Server 2003 I am *guessing* that CF5 will run on W2k3 server but, I know that it will n

RE: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-20 Thread Mark W. Breneman
Fusion Developer -Network Administrator   Vivid Media   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.vividmedia.com   608.270.9770   _   From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Windows Server 2003 Is CF5 even supported on Win2k3? I would imagine

Re: Windows Server 2003

2004-04-20 Thread Adrocknaphobia
Is CF5 even supported on Win2k3? I would imagine it's not since it didnt exist when CF5 was out. -adam > -Original Message- > From: David Koehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 09:37 PM > To: 'CF-Talk' > Subject: Windows Server 2003 > > Ok, our old Dell server

RE: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?

2004-03-26 Thread Raymond Camden
You probably have a simple logic error somewhere. Can you show us the contents of makeSomeFIles and makeSomeHTML? [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

RE: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?

2004-03-26 Thread Jon Block
2:29 PM   To: CF-Talk   Subject: RE: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?   > The problem is that when, and only when, I call ,   > the ENTIRE http request appears to be running two times! I can't   > understand why that would possibly happen. In other words, in my   > little tre

RE: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?

2004-03-25 Thread Raymond Camden
Sure, you can use closing tags with cfmodule : The only thing you have to look out for is cases of additional cfmodules inside... In this case, CF will think you are closing moo, not zoo. In this case, you will have to use syntax. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription]

Re: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?

2004-03-25 Thread Frank Mamone
Had the same problem with CFMODULE. As Dave explained, that is the solution, however I'm not sure if you can use that code with CFMODULE. We just stopped using the using the />. -Frank   - Original Message -   From: Jon Block   To: CF-Talk   Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:51 AM   Sub

RE: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?

2004-03-25 Thread Raymond Camden
> To avoide this, within the custom tag, you can enclose all > the other code within this: > > > ... > Actually, instead of wrapping all your code one big cfif, why not just do this at top: Just be sure to reset any cfsetting you may have set at top. IMHO, this is better than wrapping an en

RE: Windows CF5 Custom Tags Bug?

2004-03-25 Thread Dave Watts
> The problem is that when, and only when, I call , > the ENTIRE http request appears to be running two times! I can't > understand why that would possibly happen. In other words, in my > little tree of nested custom tags, a very simple tag which > generates some text is causing the entire reque

Re: windows mailing list

2004-02-19 Thread Jim McAtee
The best I've found is the NTSysAdmin list at Sunbelt Software.  Positively reeks with IT types.  (Whether that's good or bad is your call.)  Some incredibly knowledgable people, though, when it comes to Windows networking issues.  There are even a few good webhosting providers on the list. http:/

RE: windows mailing list

2004-02-19 Thread Dave Watts
> Sorry for off topic, but it seems that most people on this > list are working with windows and thus most likely can point > me in the right direction. I am having some problems setting > up domain controller for my workplace. Does anyone know of a > good mailing list or other resource that wo

RE: Windows NT source code

2004-02-13 Thread cfhelp
Even though I am going to probably have to deal with an increase in Hacks I think this may be a good thing, as it will force M$ to get off there a$$ and fix more in OS. Well then again I could see them saying Windows 2003 fix’s all. Rick -Original Message- From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMA

RE: Windows Authentication

2004-01-14 Thread Schuster, Steven
Turn on Windows Integrated Security in IIS under the properties of the a.) folder or b.) site you wish to integrate with the domain. Stephen E. Schuster PeopleSoft Administrator 2000 Ashland Drive Ashland, KY 41101 Office Phone 606.920.7447 Cell Phone 606.831.4590   _   From: Robert Everla

RE: Windows Authentication

2004-01-14 Thread Schuster, Steven
Yes and No, what Web Server are you using? Stephen E. Schuster PeopleSoft Administrator 2000 Ashland Drive Ashland, KY 41101 Office Phone 606.920.7447 Cell Phone 606.831.4590   _   From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:02 AM To: CF-Ta

Re: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion

2003-12-21 Thread Eric Dawson
 Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:16 PM   Subject: Re: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion   Maybe this will help: http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/install_cf_win2003.htm   - Calvin     - Original Message -     From: Marc van den Dikkenberg     To: CF-Talk

Re: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion

2003-12-19 Thread Calvin Ward
Maybe this will help: http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/install_cf_win2003.htm - Calvin   - Original Message -   From: Marc van den Dikkenberg   To: CF-Talk   Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:02 PM   Subject: Re: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion   &

Re: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion

2003-12-19 Thread Marc van den Dikkenberg
> You won't be able to install CF 4.5.x and have it work with the version of > IIS that comes with Windows Server 2003. You may be able to select "Other > Server" during the CF install when it asks you what web server you're > running. You may also be able to get the CF installer to think that you

RE: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Watts
> I have some old NT4 machines running CF4.5 that we plan to upgrade > to a newer version of windows, but need to make sure that CF4.5 > actually works on 'em... I have searched google all day for this > one, but unfortunately have not been able to find an answer. Does > anyone here know whethe

RE: Windows 2003 Web Edition & ColdFusion

2003-12-17 Thread Barney Boisvert
I had 4.5 running on win2k Advanced Server, so it'll run on there.  Can't help you with the 2k3 stuff though. Cheers, barneyb > -Original Message- > From: Marc van den Dikkenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 5:11 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Windows 2003

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread cf-talk
"Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:47 AM Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server? > I am using Win 2003 Enterprise, and the system info says it is IIS 6.0 > > ===

RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Dave Watts
> Actually Win 2003 is IIS 5.2 and XP is IIS 6.x > > Don't ask me why. I just happen to have a Win 2003 server > right here and a cfdump reveals IIS 5.2 :-) There's something odd going on there, then, since Windows Server 2003 definitely comes with IIS 6. It's quite a bit different from the vers

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Doug White
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:08 PM Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server? | Actually Win 2003 is IIS 5.2 and XP is IIS 6.x | | Don't ask me why.  I just happen to have a Win 2003 server right here and a | cfdump reveals IIS 5.2 :-) | | Also... as far as

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread cf-talk
appier. -Novak - Original Message - From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:19 AM Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server? > You are incorrect. > Win2k supports IIS 5.0 and Win 2003 is IIS

Re: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread Doug White
w Fusfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: RE: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?] | We are using Windows Server 2003 Web Edition with ColdFusion MX 6.1 | stan

RE: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread cfhelp
ton or getting ready to. Regards, John Paul Ashenfelter CTO/Transitionpoint [EMAIL PROTECTED]   - Original Message -   From: Dave Watts   To: CF-Talk   Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:03 AM   Subject: RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?   > That is total crap as Win2003 is based

RE: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread Matthew Fusfield
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:02 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?] The bulk of the reasons that the "default" install is safer is that it turns off a lot of unnecessary services/etc. If you standard fi

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Kevin Pompei
Ah ha!  This explains a problem I've been hitting my head over.  Thanks! There are a number of subtle, yet significant differences between IIS 5 and 6 that I keep learning about and have made this Windows upgrade challenging.  All in all, though,  I like the "lock everything down by default" ph

Windows 2003 editions: Web vs Standard [WAS Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?]

2003-10-02 Thread John Paul Ashenfelter
Original Message -   From: Dave Watts   To: CF-Talk   Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:03 AM   Subject: RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?   > That is total crap as Win2003 is based on WinXP code which   > was based on Win2K code and as such shares many of the same   > vu

RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Dave Watts
> That is total crap as Win2003 is based on WinXP code which > was based on Win2K code and as such shares many of the same > vulnerabilities. > > Do not consider installing Win2003 to be as "safe" as an > unpatched Win2K installation. The "default install" of Windows Server 2003 is much safer

RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Jim Davis
oup myself - but the product is pretty sweet.  I don't think that you'll go wrong by adopting it early. Jim Davis -Original Message- From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:35 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server? As

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Doug White
satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! - Original Message - From: "Peter Tilbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:45 AM Subject: RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server? | That is total crap as

RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Peter Tilbrook
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 6:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server? As one who is running servers in both configurations, I strongly recommend the Win 2003 server. First, it does not have the vulnerabilities that are found in Win2k, and do not require patching any

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread jonhall
Personally I'd wait for SP1 before even thinking about it. However, if I had some wiggle room (meaning huge client wasn't going to kill me if the server had a few hiccups), and upgrading to 2003 in 6 months or so didn't look likely...it might be worth it to bite the bullet now rather than be stuck

Re: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Doug White
As one who is running servers in both configurations, I strongly recommend the Win 2003 server. First, it does not have the vulnerabilities that are found in Win2k, and do not require patching anywhere near as often. Second, Most services are default to OFF, which requires a little more attention t

RE: Windows 2000 or 2003 Server?

2003-10-02 Thread Craig Dudley
Had the same choice last week and went for 2003, MX doesn't have any isues installing on either. We went for 2003 as it's supposedly more stable/secure and is likley to be supported longer. Craig. -Original Message- From: Ryan Sabir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 October 2003 0

RE: Windows Update

2003-06-30 Thread Dave Watts
> Erm, it could be a bad class file within IE. Windows Update > basically is "hfnetchk" with a few add-ons etc. This isn't really accurate at all. The two tools work completely differently, although they provide similar functionality. There are lots of known problems with Windows Update (tak

<    1   2   3   4   >