to use Chrome Frame as the basis for the next
version of CEF.
☆PhistucK
Regards,
Marshall
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 21:43, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks to the wonderful support of the Chromium development community the
Chromium Embedded Framework
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:
http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/.
Marshall would probably appreciate to have some help.
More help is always welcome :-)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
test_shell being a test shell used mostly for non-interactive testing,
we haven't given a lot of concern to its perfomance AFAIK. I'm not
even sure how long of a lifespan it'll have since we aim to
merge/replace it with
similar to one of the other
WebKit APIs) I'd imagine patches would be welcome though.
I believe only Darin can speak to this authoritatively, though.
J
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Adam Barth aba
Hi All,
The Chromium WebKit API does not currently provide a wrapper for the
WebCore::Document object associated with a WebCore::Frame. CEF (
http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded), which also uses the WebKit API,
would like access to this object at the C++ level. Is there interest in the
(perhaps using a
v8::Function as the listener).
Inputs would need to be sanity-checked by the API based on the underlying
object context, but I don't think we need to provide separate API
classes/methods for each possibility.
Adam
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl
does not define WTF_USE_GOOGLEURL. Two days wasted, case closed.
Apologies to anyone who spent time thinking about this issue.
Regards,
Marshall
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Starting some time after rev 28713 I'm having a strange
Hi All,
I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium
build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a solid state
drive? Have you noticed any compile or link time speed improvements relative
to using a second traditional SATA drive?
Thanks,
Marshall
...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium
build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a solid state
drive? Have you noticed any compile or link time speed
, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone happen to have a script for generating more-or-less complete
.gyp configurations given an .sln or .vcproj input?
Thanks,
Marshall
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium
Hi All,
Does anyone happen to have a script for generating more-or-less complete
.gyp configurations given an .sln or .vcproj input?
Thanks,
Marshall
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change
or is it better to just let these objects leak?
Thanks,
Marshall
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to debug the leak of CachedResource objects in test_shell.
Every time I browse to a page that contains an image or CSS file
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
I think there may be more than one code path to CachedResource removal.
1. See DocLoader. It has a DocumentResourceMap that contains
Hi All,
I'm trying to debug the leak of CachedResource objects in test_shell. Every
time I browse to a page that contains an image or CSS file a new
CachedResource object is created in Cache.cpp createResource(). However,
none of these objects are ever freed. Does anyone happen to know
For anyone still interested in this issue, change sets for WebKit and
Chromium are available here:
http://codereview.chromium.org/220010 (WebKit)
http://codereview.chromium.org/225012 (Chromium)
Thanks,
Marshall
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
Hi All,
We're having a conversation over on the o3d-discuss list about how to
support third-party C++ extensions for o3d:
http://groups.google.com/group/o3d-discuss/browse_thread/thread/6fee1142eafd08b1
Does anyone know if adding this capability is currently planned?
Thanks,
Marshall
Very cool! I'll check it out :-)
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We're having a conversation over on the o3d-discuss
Hi Jerry,
The CEF project is separate from the Chromium project, and CEF-specific
questions should not be directed to the chromium-dev mailing list.
The CEF project is alive and well, but as with most open source projects it
is run by volunteers. Chromium trunk is a fast-moving target and so the
Out of curiosity, what work remains to support a 64bit build on Windows?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
The v8 team did some amazing work this quarter building a working
64-bit port. After a handful of changes on the Chromium side, I've
had Chromium
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Though this isn't my area of expertise, if you didn't find something
on dev.chromium.org, I believe there isn't such a doc. We've done a
pretty good job of moving all prior internal docs to the public site
and off the top
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now,
Random drive-by note: Most consumers of URLRequest would be much happier
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Wan-Teh Chang w...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Marshall
Greenblattmagreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself
consistently
forgetting the relationship between the various
Hi All,
I've been using url_request for a while now, and I find myself consistently
forgetting the relationship between the various managers/handlers and order
in which the asynchronous calls take place. Does anyone currently have a
document/diagram for url_request that we can put up under
equivalent to executeCommand(SelectAll), for instance.
What do you think?
-Darin
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Darin,
The Undo(), Redo(), Cut(), Copy(), Paste() and Delete() methods were
removed from WebFrame when the class moved
in sync with WebCore.
I agree that selectAll should be dropped in favor of
executeCommand(SelectAll).
-Darin
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote:
Yes, sorry about
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote:
Yes, sorry about that. Please see render_view.cc. They are just
implemented using WebFrame::executeCommand.
Ah, I see. As an API consumer
Hi Darin,
The Undo(), Redo(), Cut(), Copy(), Paste() and Delete() methods were removed
from WebFrame when the class moved to the public API. Is there currently a
way to perform these actions?
Thanks,
Marshall
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
There are a handful of changes in the tree intended for Chrome OS.
They are wrapped in the LINUX2 ifdef, which will shortly change to
CHROME_OS. While you can certainly build this configuration on Linux
now, running it
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I imagine this could require complex controls like tree views, icon lists,
date pickers, etc. Will we see these controls as native
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Elliot Glaysher (Chromium) e...@chromium.org
wrote:
If you are using git-cl:
git cl patch patch URL or rietveld issue id
Ok, it's time to jump of the git bandwagon :-) Thanks for the fast
responses guys!
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Marshall
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Marshall
Greenblattmagreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Marshall
know if this is
something that would be accepted upstream or not. Perhaps a
WebCore::HistoryItem should just hold a WebCore::ResourceRequest.
-Darin
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We currently have the ability to set extra HTTP
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
You can probably make the case on bugs.webkit.org for a change like this
to HistoryItem by observing that Apple's WebKit API also has
.
I've been thinking about that too. Maybe we should mention in the method
comment that it's used by an external consumer?
-Darin
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com
the chromium embedded framework
become part of the Chromium code base (with a full set of related test
cases, builders, etc) but that might not be a popular option ;-).
Regards,
-Darin
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
In this case, because the method will be part of the WebKit API
Hi All,
Is there any way to search rietveld issues? For instance, I would find it
particularly useful if I could search for all open issues that touch certain
source paths.
Thanks,
Marshall
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
://groups.google.ca/group/chromium-reviewsAs far as I know ;x
-- Mohamed Mansour
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any way to search rietveld issues? For instance, I would find it
particularly useful if I could search for all open
Hi All,
We currently have the ability to set extra HTTP header fields in
WebURLRequest. However, the extra HTTP header fields are not stored in
WebHistoryItem and are therefore lost after navigation. This is a problem
for applications that use extra HTTP headers to pass important information
to
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Marshall
Greenblattmagreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
We currently have the ability to set extra HTTP header fields in
WebURLRequest. However, the extra HTTP header fields are not stored in
Hi Darin,
Your rev 19669 removes the WebFrame::GetPrintPageShrink() method that was
added in rev 14639:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=14639
--- begin paste ---
Rev 12100 changed the way that we spool and render printed output, most
notably
introducing use of the
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Darin,
Your rev 19669 removes the WebFrame::GetPrintPageShrink() method that was
added in rev 14639:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=14639
--- begin paste ---
Rev 12100 changed
Hi All,
The TestShell::Navigate() method contains the following comment and code:
// Restore focus to the main frame prior to loading new request.
// This makes sure that we don't have a focused iframe. Otherwise, that
// iframe would keep focus when the SetFocus called immediately after
()
isn't called from anywhere else in the chromium code base. I'll comment it
out in TestShell and see what happens with the layout tests.
-Darin
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
The TestShell::Navigate() method contains
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:
I think we should do a page. This work is not otherwise on our
immediate term plan so it may as well get done the right way. I think
the page is more of a print preview than a print settings.
Would it be
Use any of the functions that accept a WebCore::String argument in
webkit/glue/glue_util.h to retrieve a string type that you know how to work
with.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Daniel Dreiberg daniel.dreiber...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
In chromium, I am trying to use WebCore's XMLSerializer
instead of the Object? Would any Objects
created with a weak reference ObjectTemplate automatically have the
destructor called for them?
Thanks,
Marshall
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm seeking a way to trigger destruction
Hi All,
I'm seeking a way to trigger destruction (or reference decrement) of a C++
object attached to a V8 object when the V8 object is destroyed. For
instance, consider the following code where I create and return a new V8
object in a function template callback:
static v8::Handlev8::Value
Hi All,
Is there currently a way to be notified when a WebFrame instance is about to
be destroyed?
The Chromium Embedded Framework needs this notification to properly clean up
memory associated with specific WebFrame instances (for example, custom
NPObject types bound to the WebFrame via
, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Is there currently a way to be notified when a WebFrame instance is
about
to be destroyed?
The Chromium Embedded Framework needs this notification to properly
clean
up memory associated with specific
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm excited about using v8::Extension instead of CppBoundClass but the
JavaScript side of v8::Extension (via the |source
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Matt Perry mpcompl...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
3. Is there a way to specify native getter/setter functions for a property
defined on the JS side? For instance, myobject.foo = bar
Hi All,
I'm excited about using v8::Extension instead of CppBoundClass but the
JavaScript side of v8::Extension (via the |source| argument) seems a bit
magical to me. Is there a document that explains the usage and capabilities
of v8::Extension in greater detail? I have the following questions
Hi All,
Is there a current document that explains the multi-process crash
service/reporting design used by Chrome via crash_service? I see the
documents available at http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/w/list but
they appear a bit dated.
Thanks,
Marshall
, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Rev 11763 removes the WebFrame pointer that was previously passed to
ResourceLoaderBridge::Create() in simple_resource_loader_bridge.cc. How
can
I use the new 'routing_id' parameter to retrieve the WebFrame
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Very nice! Two suggestions:
1) Show the date/time for each revision, perhaps as a tooltip that appears
when
need it?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Rev 11763 removes the WebFrame pointer that was previously passed to
ResourceLoaderBridge::Create() in simple_resource_loader_bridge.cc. How can
I use the new 'routing_id' parameter
Hi Vijay,
Once you have your code linking with chromium, you have two options for
registering your internal NPAPI plugin.
1. Add an entry to the builtin_plugins array in
webkit/glue/plugins/plugin_list_win.cc PluginList::PlatformInit().
2. Use the following approach that can be called from
Will it be possible to create Chrome extensions with binary components? For
instance, Mozilla extensions can distribute and access XPCOM components.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Matt Perry mpcompl...@chromium.org wrote:
I wrote up a short design doc covering what our extension process model
be easy to do, I'd be happy
to review it if you send me a patch :)
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, registering with a WebPluginInfo and function pointers would be
the ideal solution :-).
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Avi
Hi All,
I would like to evaluate the URL that will be opened in a newly created
popup window before the view for that window is created. It seems that the
WebViewDelegate::CreateWebView() method might be the appropriate place to do
this, but that method does not get the popup URL as an argument.
the scenario that you have in mind that dynamic registration
would help with? If we're making changes here, we should take your usage
needs into account.
Avi
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
it if you send me a patch :)
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, registering with a WebPluginInfo and function pointers would be
the ideal solution :-).
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Avi Drissman a...@chromium.org wrote:
In that case
Hi All,
Do we currently have layout tests that specifically target printing output?
If not, how feasible would it be to create them? As an example of something
currently broken for printing that a layout test might be able to catch: if
you print a google search result page you'll notice that the
What is chromium's usage plan for /trunk? It seems that recent beta and
release builds of chrome are coming off of /branches/chrome_official_branch
-- is there a process in place to synchronize
/branches/chrome_official_branch with /trunk at some set interval? Or will
they be kept separate with
Hi All,
I've added support to CEF for creating embedded NPAPI plugins (see the
updated cefclient project from svn). Embedded plugins provide the same
capabilities as DLL-based plugins but are implemented as an integrated
component of the container application. So, for instance, you can now
(Lmyclass3, new CClientJSHandler());
peng
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
The chromium embedded framework (CEF) project is now available for
download via svn:
http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/
The CEF project
Sorry to be a pest, but has there been any progress on this?
Thanks,
Marshall
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Pam Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark/Pam,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Mark Mentovai
Hi All,
The chromium embedded framework (CEF) project is now available for download
via svn:
http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/
The CEF project is an extension of the Chromium project, and so to build
applications with CEF you must first download Chromium. The CEF files must
then be
---
solutions = [
{ name: src,
url: svn://chrome-svn.corp.google.com/chrome/trunk/src,
},
{ name: cef,
url: http://chromiumembedded.googlecode.com/svn/trunk;,
},
]
--- CUT HERE ---
(I haven't tried out)
M-A
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED
code.google.com wiki system
works.
--Amanda
Thanks,
Marshall
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
The chromium embedded framework (CEF) project is now available for
download
via svn:
http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded
and built. I will be
happy to submit it to the community once finished!
Daniel A. White
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Amanda Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks interesting!
Suggestion: put links to your
will this repository be hosted?
Daniel A. White
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll probably want to wait for the initial implementation (perhaps
coming this weekend) since I've already written most of the functionality --
I just need
still in the experimental
stage).
--Amanda
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Daniel A. White
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, I am itching to help start coding this... any objections?
On Nov 25, 4:04 pm, Marshall Greenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Cool, it sounds like the embedded
Hi All,
In order to use a class in standard library containers it needs to meet the
CopyConstructible and Assignable requirements of the C++ Standard Library.
These requirements are defined as follows:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0/doc/html/CopyConstructible.html
Sorry, it is assignable. I misread the boost documentation -- I saw
swap(x, y) and thought that meant:
templateclass T void swap(scoped_ptrT a, scoped_ptrT b);
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Wan-Teh Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
Cool, it sounds like the embedded browser spaces on linux and osx are well
accounted for. For the time being I'll continue with an os-agnostic
approach because it's relatively painless to do so. Here, then, is the
embedded browser framework that I envision, complete with C++ class
definitions:
and its introspection capabilities. I don't see why a
framework wouldn't do.
Avi
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
As many of you probably know there's been talk of developing a
chrome-based ActiveX (COM) control for Windows
advantages if you're not
trying to create a drop-in replacement for Microsoft's WebBrowser
control.
--Amanda
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ActiveX control that I'm developing for Windows isn't portable, but
the
underlying chrome-based
I've begun the embedded browser framework document here:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/EmbeddedBrowserFramework
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Chromium-dev group.
To post to this group,
for MFC - which I could take advantage of.
Daniel A. White
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The framework that I envision for embedded clients will be very simple
and focused, with access to only a subset of the functionality provided by
chromium's
be made
world-readable?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Adam Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, it would be nice if there was a simple diff tool for seeing what
changes have been made with each revision
Hi All,
As many of you probably know there's been talk of developing a chrome-based
ActiveX (COM) control for Windows. But what about other platforms?
For OSX, Apple offers a COM-like framework called Core Foundation
Plug-ins:
Hi All,
Is it safe to create (via Browser::Create*()) and/or access Browser object
instances from multiple threads? In other words, I need to choose one of
the following options:
A) Synchronize all Browser object creation and access via the main process
thread (single thread model in COM
Hi Brett,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Brett Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Is it safe to create (via Browser::Create*()) and/or access Browser
object
instances from multiple threads? In other
Hi Brett,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Brett Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brett,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Brett Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Marshall
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Why are you creating a Browser object? What does that have to do with
embedding?
-Ben
Please review the reference implementation for a better understanding of how
I'm currently using Browser objects:
Hi Brett,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Brett Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your input, I think I understand now. Both the Windows
message
loop and the chrome task queue co-exist
Hi Amanda,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Amanda Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi M-A,
We all know that development issues can become emotional for those
closely
involved with them. Lets all please
Hi Amanda,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Amanda Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As has been mentioned by others, I could more easily fork chrome and
develop
whatever I choose. However, I prefer an approach that will allow me to
contribute my changes back to the chrome project as a
Hi M-A,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
To add to Amanda's email (I wrote it at the same time)
You seem overly cautious of saying that you don't want to creating
anything that would compete with Chromium or Google Chrome. Keep in
mind that we
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Marshall Greenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To test the feasibility of turning Chrome into a multi-process ActiveX
control I'm going to implement a simple experiment sans COM. The goal of
this experiment is to have a client application launch chrome.exe
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:32 PM, thetrueaplus [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I know Microsoft has this interface. IWebBrowser2.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa752127(VS.85).aspxhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa752127%28VS.85%29.aspx
Gecko's ActiveX component implements this.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Daniel A. White [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Well they are already using some MPL code.
http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html :P
Hmm. I think most of the code currently licensed under MPL is kept as
separate libraries (npapi, npsr, etc). I'm not sure if us
Hi Ben,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Any embedding should _not_ touch the browser code (and changes to this
code to support it won't be accepted). WebContents/etc is probably the
highest level you want to get. I would probably suggest re-using
Hi Ken,
Thank you for your very concise analysis of the licensing question :-).
Regards,
Marshall
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Ken Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marshall,
You should ask your attorney if you need to change the language of
your licensing disclosures, but the answer is
for additional background on what we're trying
to achieve:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/9d6f282f68c77528#
-Ben
Regards,
Marshall
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Ben
Hi M-A,
Thank you for your questions :-).
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Have you thought about other possible implementations?
We're still very much in the exploratory stage, and so all options are
currently on the table. The final solution will
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marshall Greenblatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be nice to leverage chromium's multi-process
architecture
in a COM context. The chromium browser process would be hosted in
a local COM server executable
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Daniel A. White
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I just found this Chromium rendering engine called Awesomium.
Daniel A. White
Alas, Awesomium does not support the value-added browser-like capabilities
that we would want in our ActiveX control. What will
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
