Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-10 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:32:53PM +0300, Damian Higgins wrote: How about this scenario. Let's say you want a VLAN tagged on all the ports, but also want different untagged VLANs on those ports (e.g. port 10 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 6, port 11 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 7).

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-10 Thread Damian Higgins
Hi, Thanks, I was under the impression that native vlan is global. Great stuff then, this setup also works on cisco :). Regards On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:32:53PM +0300, Damian Higgins wrote: How about this

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-10 Thread Beck, Andre
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:30:52AM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: On 4/9/2013 12:16 AM, Mike wrote: It it helps. I do also have dot1q native vlan tagging enabled. I just can't see inside of the switch and understand where my frames are going. If I put it into switchport mode access, and switchport

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-09 Thread Jona Gyula
Hi, How embarrassing... Model number: WS-C3560-48TS-S c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE5.bin interface FastEthernet0/33 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 33 switchport mode trunk end SW3#sh run | i dot1q ta vlan dot1q tag native SW3#sh int f0/33 swi | i

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-09 Thread Mike
On 04/08/2013 09:48 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I would like to be able to accept both tagged and untagged frames on my 3560g. For the untagged frames, I'd like to be able to say these are a member of some vlan - say 100 - otherwise I want to be able to allow tagged frames from some

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-09 Thread Damian Higgins
Hi Mike, How about this scenario. Let's say you want a VLAN tagged on all the ports, but also want different untagged VLANs on those ports (e.g. port 10 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 6, port 11 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 7). So native VLAN is out of question here since all ports would

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-09 Thread Matthew Huff
-4039 -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Damian Higgins Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:33 PM To: Mike Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-09 Thread Lee
On 4/9/13, Damian Higgins linnew...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mike, How about this scenario. Let's say you want a VLAN tagged on all the ports, but also want different untagged VLANs on those ports (e.g. port 10 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 6, port 11 tagged vlan 306 and untagged vlan 7). int

[c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Mike
Hi, I would like to be able to accept both tagged and untagged frames on my 3560g. For the untagged frames, I'd like to be able to say these are a member of some vlan - say 100 - otherwise I want to be able to allow tagged frames from some list. In testing, it doesn't appear that

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Mike
On 04/08/2013 09:23 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Try adding 6 to the allowed list on the trunk. I did, no dice. Also my example says 'vlan 100' but really I mean I want vlan 6 to receive the untagged traffic, as you have surmised. ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Jeff Kell
On 4/9/2013 12:16 AM, Mike wrote: It it helps. I do also have dot1q native vlan tagging enabled. I just can't see inside of the switch and understand where my frames are going. If I put it into switchport mode access, and switchport access vlan 6, it all works fine and I see mac addresses in

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Try adding 6 to the allowed list on the trunk. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-04-09, at 12:16 AM, Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: Hi, I would like to be able to accept both tagged and untagged frames on my 3560g. For the untagged frames, I'd like to be able

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Disable native vlan tagging and just set native vlan 6. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-04-09, at 12:30 AM, Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: On 04/08/2013 09:23 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Try adding 6 to the allowed list on the trunk. I did, no dice. Also my example

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Nevermind... Mid-read the initial config. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-04-09, at 12:23 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: Try adding 6 to the allowed list on the trunk. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-04-09, at 12:16 AM, Mike

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread sthaug
I would like to be able to accept both tagged and untagged frames on my 3560g. For the untagged frames, I'd like to be able to say these are a member of some vlan - say 100 - otherwise I want to be able to allow tagged frames from some list. In testing, it doesn't appear that

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Not on my switch. I just happen to have set this up today, funnily enough. It takes untagged frames on the trunk and tags them with the native vlan. It doesn't drop them. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-04-09, at 12:30 AM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: On 4/9/2013 12:16 AM,

Re: [c-nsp] 3560g switch - tagged vlans and untagged frames

2013-04-08 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Weird. I just set this exact thing up this afternoon and it works fine. Untagged frames on the trunk are tagged with the native vlan. -- Sent from my mobile device On 2013-04-09, at 12:30 AM, Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: On 04/08/2013 09:23 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Try