, and
pe-ce routing protocols which are all vrf specific on the PE. And then on
the CE you really don't need vrf specific configs, but rather, vanilla
routing configurations. That's how I understand it
Aaron
From: Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 3:49 PM
ctrl+c, ctrl-v
I only know copy and paste. I don't believe there is a command to do what
you are asking.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:47 AM, amir agha monito...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi list
Is there any command/ command syntax to copy running configuration of one
interface e.g interface serial1/0
! We've been running good for 5 days now.
A question is why didn't this present a problem with a cmts connected to an
me3600x ? I didn't have to do any mtu changes on that one and it worked
fine. I left me3600 interface at 1500 and I've heard of no customer
complaints on that cmts
Aaron
that is ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:31 AM
To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ipsla - latency - related to cellular backhaul
Hi Aron,
Well I believe that any type of active probe
says that this drop and the latency seen using various ipsla pings is
expected since all pings are treated less than everything else and could be
getting policed by LPTS (I don't know what LPTS is)
What do y'all think about all this?
Aaron
?
WORD VFI name
Switch(config)#l2vpn vfi context vfi ?
cr
Why would I use one over the other?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Ryce
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:15 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c
)
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Caillin Bathern [mailto:caill...@commtelns.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 7:57 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky; Nick Ryce; Aaron; Waris Sagheer (waris);
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS
VPLS multihoming is the major up-shot of BGP
.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (GMT-5)
8:00 a.m.-9:00 a.m.
Pacific Time (GMT-8)
**
Aaron
-Original
Well why didn't you just say so! Haha, Seriously, thanks a bunch bep. I'll
begin reading up on this.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Pinsky [mailto:b...@whack.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:19 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: 'Caillin Bathern'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; adam.vitkov
, as I mentioned previously
I had removed my vpls architecture for l3vpn preference.
Aaron
From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:wa...@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 10:10 PM
To: Nick Ryce; Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS
All PEs within a given
Ahhh, thanks Nick, hence why my scenario using LDP Signaling didn't need it
huh. Thanks for the clarification
Aaron
From: Nick Ryce [mailto:n...@fluency.net.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:48 AM
To: Aaron; 'Waris Sagheer (waris)'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp
This is for VPLS w/BGP AD w/LDP Sig ME3600 and ASR9006...
Aaron
-- IOS (ME3600 I don't recall if it was 15.2 or 15.3)
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
service instance 1 ethernet
encapsulation (whatever you wanna do
Trying to hide configs, I probably shouldn't have change this in my previous
email regarding me3600 ios...
router bgp 123
should be...
router bgp 64512
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:33 AM
To: 'Mohammad Khalil'; 'Blake
be aware of ?
Aaron
p.s. hope y'all don't mind, I'm adding the list back to cc's, since this
seems like good info for the community to benefit from.
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 6:41 AM
To: Gabor Szabo (gabszabo)
Cc: Aaron
Anyone know what and why to use this ve stuff? I didn't use it during my
vpls (ios-ioxr) trial run in my network and never understood what it was
for...
ve id 1
ve range 11
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Ryce
this session to view the errors
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config-track)#
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k#sh run track track-default-route
Tue Apr 16 11:41:42.273 CDT
track track-default-route
type route reachability
vrf oneone
route ipv4 0.0.0.0/0
!
delay up 10
!
Aaron
Gateway of last resort is not set
C10.101.14.20/30 is directly connected, 01:19:40,
GigabitEthernet0/0/0/10
L10.101.14.21/32 is directly connected, 01:19:40,
GigabitEthernet0/0/0/10
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k#
From: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 11:46 AM
..it's quick
as I recall, loose a couple pings and that's it
Aaron
From: Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:hilmy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 1:47 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: Harold 'Buz' Dale; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; aaron.go...@gvtc.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Transition - IP/MPLS Backbone
have the not enough routes supported issue
A4 - 209 routes currently. I see EX4550 does mpls. Don't know how much it
costs though...gonna talk to Juniper this morning in webex. Is ex4550 a
good box?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:and...@2sheds.de]
Sent: Monday
eventually.
I'm testing 6VPE (mpls l3vpn ipv6 capable) now..as I see/understand it,
there are zero ipv6 routes in my ipv4 mpls global core. Adding ipv6 to the
pre-existing customer mpls l3vpn's doesn't add any routes at all to the igp
core.
Aaron
From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:and...@2sheds.de
1332 ms32 ms32 ms 2400:8800:7f04:6::2
1432 ms32 ms32 ms 2600:1404:8:1:9200::90
Trace complete.
C:\
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Ahmed Hilmy
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 2:28 PM
To: Harold 'Buz
Thanks Oliver for the input, I'm planning on not doing L3 on whichever DC
ToR switch I go with and simply doing the L3 on the uplinked ASR9006
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Oliver Garraux
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013
.
Juniper ? don't know.but I see on their web site something about QFX3500,
EX4500, EX4550 but haven't look at them yet.
Other vendor ?
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
Are you talking about sfp/xfp 3rd party support in NXOS? If so, would this
limitation apply to Cisco 5548UP as well ? Asking since I'm considering
buying some of those and want to know what I'm getting myself into.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Loc ac err on 7609.. ? I'm thinking g1/18 on 7609 is L3 int, and in order
for vpws l2vpn pw to come up, ac (g1/18) must be converted to L2 interface
perhaps try on 7609...
Conf t
Default interface GigabitEthernet1/18
interface GigabitEthernet1/18
switchport
description TEST_MPLS_PSEUDOWIRE
Yes, lots of times
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 3:01 AM
To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
Hi Aaron,
Have you tried to turn it on and off again? :)
controller dwdm x/x
wavelength frequency 19350
network connection id 0/1/0/1
network port id 0/1/0/1
admin-state in-service
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Mohacsi Janos [mailto:moha...@niif.hu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:20 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: 'Pshem Kowalczyk'; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: Re
Have you opened up a case with TAC?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
I tried, still same one-way arp. Also removed the dwdm equipment this
morningnow it's direct fiber and still same one-way arp seen
Does this look weird that one says 10G-TUNABLE
Yes
I'm feel like up'ing to sev2 and getting live hand-off
the tac eng recommended trying a different port on asr9k. you think that's
what it is ?
Aaron
From: Aaron [mailto:dudep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:16 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: Mohacsi Janos; cisco-nsp
Subject
---
Address AgeHardware Addr State Type Interface
1.1.1.1 - .. DeletedARPA TenGigE0/1/0/1
1.1.1.2 - 04c5.a4e2.2e2d Interface ARPA TenGigE0/1/0/1
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#
Aaron
: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:38 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron wrote:
Any assistance is appreciated
show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 both ends.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:57 PM
To: 'Mikael Abrahamsson'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 Tue Apr 2 12:57:25.697 CDT
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:12 PM
To: 'Mikael Abrahamsson'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
Interesting, look what I just saw while comparing is this significant?
9k-1...
Optics Status
I just checked this with my collegue...
The link from 9k to 9k passes through dwdm filters which filter on channel 35
We pad that link and get around -12 to -15
What do you think about all this ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com]
Sent
Running ios xr 4.1.2
-Original Message-
From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:58 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
If the filters only allow channel 35 that's what the optics should be tuned
side. I had issues with converting from pure ip to mpls pe and wanted to
share with y'all.
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail
are still working on that asr9k linecard and so I didn't think that this
second cmts being mpls uplinked through there would be an issue..but I had
to mention it since I'm seeing weirdness..
Any thoughts or input would be appreciated.
Aaron
disk0:asr9k-mcast-p-4.1.2
aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:09 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] whoa - asr9k wierd message
Another commonality the tac pointed out to me amongst my me's that crashed
is that they are all running the l2vpn vpls address family.
What's 16T? ...16 Ten gig ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:01 AM
To: Aaron
Cc
Most large networks usually use UTC. It makes it easy to collaborate
network events across the whole network. Of course, as long as the network
is all set to the same TZ then you that shouldn't be a issue.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Deny IP Any Any denyipany...@gmail.comwrote:
my
, which did NOT reboot
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
In ios xr how would I summarize all more specific's within this range, BUT
leak a more specifics ?
router bgp 64512
vrf one
rd 1.1.1.1:1
address-family ipv4 unicast
aggregate-address 10.0.0.0/8 summary-only
but I want to leak, 10.10.10.0/24
how would I do that ?
Aaron
Have you looked to see if you download the rommon separately?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM, ibogzipper iboge ibogzip...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Grzegorz, down time window is the problem to go for 2 steps .
rommon upgrades are in the FPD package but if i want to do the turboboot
there is
to kick in ?
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
No. loopback connected network showed up in rib but not in bgp table.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 7:29 AM
To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] bgp aggregate address
Did you get
: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 7:55 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] bgp aggregate address
On 28/02/13 13:38, Aaron wrote:
No. loopback connected network showed up in rib
Fixed.
we got 2 other sfp's from another ME3600 in our network and put them in the (2)
me3600's that were showing problems with those previous sfps, and they work
fine. apparently those other (3) SFP's we had were from a bad batch or
something.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Pshem
Looks like the attachment circuit is down on the me3600 (int g0/11 not up up
?). That will cause the pw to not come up as I recall
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pshem Kowalczyk
Sent: Thursday
unsupported-transceiver
no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid
but this still doesn't make it work. i tried 2 different me3600 chassis and
2 different sfp's. same result. field tech using light meter sees NO LIGHT
coming right off sfp
me3600x running 15.3(1)S
Aaron
that or where an attack is coming from.
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
The IPs shouldn't change.
Do you have an example?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:07 AM, zaid zaidoo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi
Why is the trace-route results give you different path and hops when
changing the DNS server for the same source/destination.
any informative notes
of people do it but it doesn’t make it healthy.
I am suffering in the fourth year of trying to get such a link replaced.**
**
Thankfully it is the last one. At least till we make another acquisition.*
***
** **
LR Mack McBride
Network Architect
** **
*From:* Aaron
At the interface level.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Eric A Louie elo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, maybe I'm missing the obvious, but within my backbone, I can't just
increase
the MTU across the Ethernet links.
router (config-if)#ip mtu ?
68-1500 MTU (bytes)
Unless this is the mtu you
Disagree, it is not a common practice.
You should make your MTU large enough.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Mack McBride mack.mcbr...@viawest.comwrote:
This is very common practice and practically everyone does it.
Usually if you have your own backbone you enlarge the backbone packet size
it down and perhaps see what lights do
Sh proc cpu his --- is it high?
Sh log - mac flapping? Perhaps enable mac-move
aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
Sent: Monday, January 28
vlans)me3600/pe---(mpls core of 9k p's, vlans
from previous design migrated into vpls)-dual 9k's bvi's w/hsrp
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:30 AM
To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c
switchport trunk allowed vlan 675
switchport mode trunk
And if anyone has any suggestions about designing loop prevention via
me3600's when I'm connecting legacy vlans over vpls via my mpls cloud then
fire away.
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp
Ugh, I asked this question like a month ago! I knew it seemed familiar
:) thanks folks for putting up with me :) Hey! Did y'all know that
efp's only support MSTP !! lol
http://www.mail-archive.com/cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg48863.html
Aaron
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/15.3_1_S/configuration/guide/swevc.html#wp1002521
I think this is what I was looking for efp's only support mstp.
Thanks Pshem
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com]
Sent: Thursday
(hsrp'd) since they have separate internet uplinks and I'm
suspecting unknown unicast flooding from the non-active hsrp asr9k over the
vpls domain towards customers. (but ugh, my dual 7609's over my legacy net
have been running like this forever!)
Aaron
Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:18 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] unknown unicast flooding - particularly regarding
fhrp's
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Aaron wrote:
How does constant unknown unicast
Ha love it. Thanks Nick
What is the definition of large L2 domain please. ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:12 AM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] unknown unicast flooding
to the pre-existing arp entries to see if they still exist at arp
timer halflife or something like that. I think I saw that while doing
debug arp or something like that one day a while back
aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun
I was thinking me3600x as that is what I use in a similar fashion, am
currently testing 6 VPE nicely too. (ipv6 over mpls l3vpn) and they have a
couple 10 gig interfaces.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
I wonder if it isn't the not ping local to bcast domain aspects of private
vlans that make them attractive as much as it's the layer 2 protection you
get to mitigate attacks on arp, mac table corruption/flooding, etc.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Sh mfib route rate
Thanks!
Aaron
From: Erçin TORUN [mailto:ercinto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:18 AM
To: John Neiberger
Cc: Aaron; Adam Vitkovsky; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] show command for active multicast kbps rate
the command is show mrib
where I got that number(s)... I vaguely recall things
like FRTS or GTS being a 1 second interval and not having the granularity of
the faster mqc toolset again, having trouble finding notes on that.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp
Is it ok to do that ?
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Active node reload Cause: User Initiated reload
**
Aaron
From: chip [mailto:chip.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 9:15 AM
To: Jason Lixfeld
Cc: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ios xr upgrade from
I think I enabled that too on my asr9k's and recall not seeing any rates
either. Wondering if there is a known issue with this. Anyone know anything
about that ?
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
* ?
Thanks, I'm trying to learn hereappreciate it. As usually, this list is
a wonderful resource and thanks to Matt and Pete for assisting thus far with
the vpls ad thing...appreciate all y'all
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun
to you.
Thanks, Aaron
Config.
Asr9k.
router bgp 64512
bgp router-id 10.101.0.254
bgp cluster-id 10
address-family l2vpn vpls-vpws
!
neighbor-group my-rr-clients
remote-as 64512
update-source Loopback0
address-family l2vpn vpls-vpws
route-reflector-client
16180
Aaron
From: Pete Lumbis [mailto:alum...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2013 9:38 PM
To: Aaron
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] l2vpn vpls w/bgp autodiscovery - me3600x to asr9k
I think you need to add the prefix-length-size 2
autodiscovery bgp
rd auto
route-target 64512:100
signaling-protocol ldp
!
!
Me3600 has
l2 vfi vpls1 autodiscovery
vpn id 100
rd 10.101.12.251:32768
route-target export 64512:100
route-target import 64512:100
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
Is there some sort of sensible meaning to those numbers located under the
ports column ? that mac address is reachable via the xconnect pw on vlan
100 svi
Aaron
3600#sh mac- address 203a.07c3.cf40
Mac Address Table
---
VlanMac
203a.07c3.cf40DYNAMIC 10.101.12.251, 1
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 11:36 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] bridge table entry for mac
I don't see any instances of spanning tree running for various efp's I've
created in my ME3600.
Is there something different with spanning tree and the Me3600x that is much
different than older cisco switches ?
voice-3600#sh spanning-tree interface g0/4 efp 336
no spanning tree info
wasn't in
therereloadedguess what, g0/25 is not in startup config even after
reload, but g0/25 is in running config. Also... conf t, int g0/? Shows
options 1-25
Funny and weird
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christ...@errxtx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19
Any idea why I see an interface g0/25 on my me3600x? this may be following
the ios upgrade to 15.3(1)S
There are only 24 physical sfp interfaces on this box
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
If it did, then there is a strange/orphaned gig0 still showing
And Andrew K says he still knows about g0 so I'm assuming he's using it...
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Steve Dodd
Sent
GVTC is at an ISP/CATV/Telephone provider, if you apply online you can send
me your resume too.
Job would be for Network Engineer - IP
http://gvtc.com/careers/
https://home.eease.adp.com/recruit2/?id=523461
https://home.eease.adp.com/recruit2/?id=523461t=1 t=1
Aaron
The FE on the 7200 is a FE, not 10/100 switchable, hence no speed.
Have you tried a different port on both sides? That would narrow down
where the issue is since you tried swapping the cable.
Is the cable passing near power cable or over power cables at not 90degs?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:33
can't do
this for every switch that loses power to one of the supplies.
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco
thanks, per the config guidance below, I have that route replicated into the
vrf that I wanted it into on the local pe where I did that replicate trick
from one vrf to another but how would I get that replicated route sent
to other neighboring pe's in that L3VPN ?
Aaron
-Original Message
Yep. Sh mac address-table | inc mod/port
Have a good day,
Aaron
Aaron Childs, CCNA
Associate Director, Networking
Information Technology
www.westfield.ma.edu/it
Please Note: new e-mail address - aa...@westfield.ma.edu
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
What is a clean/easy way to leak a couple routes between two vrf's ? if you
have links to docs or sites that explain this or you know how , lemme know
please.
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman
Haven't y'all had to use this command often ? I have. Doesn't seem to work
without it in many scenarios...
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
...seems that for basic, single dot1q tag trunking, I've found that this
command is required. Lemme know what you think.
However, in scenarios where
, and that I should be using svc instances
to see per L2 flows via a interface.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 2:35 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re
Oh, btw, since I brought up asr901 (off topic in this thread, please
forgive) if anyone knows how to perform per-flow-point (per service
instance) policing by matching on vlan id rcv'd from customer , please
advise on how to config...
Aaron
___
cisco
Can I do nat on this platform ? I wanted to nat a bvi interface's subnet.
The bvi is in a mpls l3vpn..vrf.
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 23/10/12 10:20, Damian Holdcroft wrote:
I remember reading something, somewhere, about the lasers sending pulses
for link detection. I don't seem to be able to find anything on fibre link
detection at the moment
no keepalive?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Tóth András diosbej...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The hw-module module x simulate link-up command will probably help
you. It causes all ports on a specified module to be up/up. It might
require service internal too.
:f8b0:400a:801::1011: time=83ms
Ping statistics for 2607:f8b0:400a:801::1011:
Packets: Sent = 3, Received = 3, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 82ms, Maximum = 83ms, Average = 82ms
Control-C
^C
C:\
Aaron
this seemed funny to mei've never seen this before, but then again I've
never done 6vpe before either...sowhat is meant by this indirectly
connected ?
Aaron
noc-3600#sh ipv ro vrf one
IPv6 Routing Table - one - 5 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static
www.ipv6chicken.com [208.83.69.51] with 32 bytes of data:
Control-C
^C
C:\ping ipv6.google.com
Ping request could not find host ipv6.google.com. Please check the name and
try again.
C:\
Aaron
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
If no way to avoid this, how do y'all do it ? maint window?
Aaron
noc-3600(config)#router bgp 64512
noc-3600(config-router)#address-family vpnv6 unicast
% IPv6 routing not enabled
noc-3600(config)#ipv unicast-routing
noc-3600(config)#router bgp 64512
noc-3600(config-router)#address-family vpnv6
like 10 seconds from
nbr_reset to Up
If no way to avoid this, how do y'all do it ? maint window?
Aaron
noc-3600(config)#router bgp 64512
noc-3600(config-router)#address-family vpnv6 unicast
% IPv6 routing not enabled
noc-3600(config)#ipv unicast-routing
noc-3600(config)#router bgp 64512
, it's done. Saying this since we seem to be looking for ipv6
capabilities to be supported in must things we do these daysso would
seem logical to setup router configs to be v6-ready then...
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@inex.ie]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02
I get some with and some without... the ones without I send system serial
number to my cisco account se and she sends me a license file
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mattias Gyllenvarg
Sent
default behavious on pw's)
please explain.
Aaron
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:sabn-9k#sh run l2vpn br gr local
Wed Sep 26 09:19:36.520 CDT
l2vpn
bridge group local
bridge-domain local
neighbor 10.101.36.2 pw-id 1
!
neighbor 10.101.36.3 pw-id 1
!
routed interface BVI5
!
!
!
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:sabn-9k#sh
401 - 500 of 884 matches
Mail list logo
