Re: [c-nsp] learned routes disappear

I would turn on debugging and see if 1:15m corresponds to one of the BGP nexthop scanning or other events. Don't leave debugging on any longer than needed on production systems. If you can replicate in a lab scenario, that would be ideal. One thing that looks odd, is that you have 2 different

Re: [c-nsp] VRF and BGP ?

I use VRF's quite a bit on 7600 and other platforms with internal OSPF neighbors. So long as the interfaces you are connecting with (dot1q vlan's in my case most of the time) are associated with that vrf, you should be able to do so, although, I've never tried to leak routes from the global

[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 WS6724-SFP link doesn't come up without intervention

Greetings, has anyone seen the following condition? WS-6724SFP with multiple LH , SX, and T connections, that operate normally when a link fails and is restored (meaning, either through far-end failure or shutdown command on that interface, then failure-resolution or 'no shut'), but one

[c-nsp] (off-topic) IP Management

This may be off-topic, but I'm not sure what lists to ask this in. We are looking for an IP management system, and are considering ipplan. Has anyone using this integrated it into ARIN's rwhois server, or what system do you use (preferably that ties into rwhois or has it built-in) to manage

Re: [c-nsp] 7206 NON VXR

NPE-225, I believe Samantha (Regional Connect) wrote: Hey Guys What is the max processor board I can use with a non vxr chasis? Thanks Samantha ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Exceeding the bandwidth points on a 7200

I think there was a supportable way of adding another module via the IO slot using a special card in the IO slot that provides you with a PA slot that doesn't count towards the BW points of the other busses if I remember correctly. Justin Shore wrote: I have a situation on a 7206VXR w/ a NPE-G1

Re: [c-nsp] Freeware management software

Try nagios or opennms, each are a little different. Nagios is a bit more customizable in service checks, but perhaps that has changed in the last few releases Walter Keen NETWORK TECHNICIAN RAINIER CONNECT -Original Message- From: Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland a...@rn.dk Sent

Re: [c-nsp] DNS Tool

Could you elaborate a little? We use Nagios to monitor other things, and use a DNS check plugin that simply does a dns query and reports if it successfully got an answer. I think there are other ones that will compare the answer to a known good answer you supply (wouldn't work well with

Re: [c-nsp] carrier router models comparison

Backplane speed per slot I would imagine. Imagine the 7600 and it's 10-port 10Ge card. If it only has 40gb on the backplane or fabric for that slot... well... lets hope all 10 ports aren't utilized to 100% at all times, It's a little over 2:1 over-subscription for the example I gave. Mateusz

Re: [c-nsp] Classify geographical traffic with BGP

If you are not advertising any space, I would imagine an AS path filter on ISP-1 (limited to 1 or 2 hops, if that works for you) and no AS path filter on ISP-2 would do the trick. You would want a floating static default route(s) for outbound traffic redundancy. Now, if you are advertising

[c-nsp] DHCP server support for mysql configuration

Greetings, I've searched the archive, but I couldn't quite find what I was looking for. Does anyone know if it's possible to use SQL for the DHCP config? (defining address ranges, all the way to configuring dhcp reservations). Where I work, we use dhcp reservations for cablemodem provisioning,

[c-nsp] OSPF fast convergence

When redesigning an OSPF service provider network, (default values, with many gig-e links). Aside from fixing link cost issues (100mbit is treated the same as gig-e at the moment) should I look at sub-second timers in OSPF 'ip ospf dead-timers minimal .' Or BFD. It looks like either would

Re: [c-nsp] network simulator

GNS is meant for router simulations, not switch simulations. Although, you can do some stuff with the 3600 series with 16ESW cards. Last time I checked there were some issues testing with spanning tree. Holemans Wim wrote: Just found out through google, will give it a try tomorrow.

[c-nsp] 7500 performance (was: Re: IO 7200 GE Improve Performance and help with the CPU Load?)

Speaking of CPU performance, does anyone have any feedback on the Cisco 7500 series, I'm considering using it instead of multiple 7204's to aggregate/terminate atm (9 oc3, 1 ds3) and T1 (channelized ds3) traffic, I'm looking at the RSP8, with vip4-80's and the appropriate PA's, and planning on

Re: [c-nsp] Extended demarc

or interference from power cabling. james edwards wrote: What is a real word limit on how far you can extend the demarc ? This is on Cat5e cable. I get wildly different figures from Google. Thanks, -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect (o) 360-832-4024 (c) 253-302-0194

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF NSSA question

except the default route coming from the ABR? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Technician

[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 rate limiting

Any suggestions on this? I'm trying to rate-limit a vlan at X mbit (4 in this case) and seeing rate-limiting working downstream to the customer but not when traffic is originating from the customer. Customer access is via a dot1q trunk (with a switch at the cust. site handing off untagged

[c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD

Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and sup720-3b) and was wondering if there were any known issues with certain IOS's in the SRC or SRD train. -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD

is the best option for this scenario? In the interim I've lowered the BGP timers so we have a hold time of 15sec, but that still means dropped calls. Justin Shore wrote: Walter Keen wrote: Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and sup720-3b) and was wondering if there were

[c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?

I've got a 7507 with dual RSP8's attempting to use rsp-jsv-mz.124-8.bin configured for rpr-plus, but keep getting this around every 10 minutes or so. It results in a loss of connectivity for end-users of course, until the system recovers. My initial guess is something is wrong with the

Re: [c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?

, and they would end up being won't fix on that platform. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier

Re: [c-nsp] Policing on a 3560

. Thanks Justin ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect (o) 360-832-4024 (c

[c-nsp] soft-disco/redirection

and 7246vxr respectively. Our intial thoughts included using some route-maps, but I was wondering if anyone had experience in doing this, and if there are any more graceful ways of doing this (including using snmp to trigger this instead of a scripted telnet session) -- Walter Keen Network

Re: [c-nsp] TACACs access filtered by device

/ -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect (o) 360-832-4024 (c) 253-302-0194 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Router reccomendation

I'm looking for a box that can take in a gigabit connection, which will have 6 sites remotely connected each at 100mbit. It's likely that near full rate will be desired on the remote sites in this hub/spoke design. The customer has some 3750's and 2800 series routers, but I am looking to see

[c-nsp] 802.1w vs EoMPLS failover time

I've got a jitter-sensitive application (voice DS3 over some RAD equipment) that we are testing, and I've got a rapid spanning tree ring through the below network. We have it down to during a spanning tree switchover (tested by adjusting the rapid-pvst cost on the trunk interface), and

Re: [c-nsp] 802.1w vs EoMPLS failover time

have different behavior when the failure is on the actual ingress node than a transit node, so you may want to investigate that if you are using FRR. Phil On Oct 29, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Walter Keen wrote: I've got a jitter-sensitive application (voice DS3 over some RAD equipment) that we

Re: [c-nsp] ubr npe-g2 vs 7200 npe-g2

@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect (o) 360-832-4024 (c) 253-302-0194 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 802.1w vs EoMPLS failover time

deal with a decent amount of latency. If you can do a 50ms or higher jitter buffer, FRR may allow you to not underrun. Phil On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Walter Keen wrote: Sorry, our current situation is that during a spanning tree switchover, it encounters a buffer underrun error on the RAD

[c-nsp] CompactFlash card compatibility

Wondering if anyone has any insight on CF card compatibility on sup720-3b's. Getting parts from Cisco can sometimes have a significant lead time, but I need to install a larger image very soon. -- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] SNMP check of ospf neighbors in SRD2a?

It looks like we lost the ability to check OSPF neighbors via snmp in SRD? See below Host xx.xx.222.194 is running 12.2(33r)SRC3 Host xx.xx.208.1 was just upgraded to 12.2(33)SRD2a (and both checks below really are checking neighbors that ARE in a full state, verified from the CLI)

[c-nsp] customizing snmp-traps (interface description as well as physical name)

on interface errors, etc. -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 BGP route-map processing

, and bandwidth through any one link is typically 100mbit (each router has 3 links) -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] Self rebooting pix?

-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Technician Rainier Connect (o) 360-832-4024 (c) 253-302-0194 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] 7600 redistribution on 12.2SRD

I'm running into some issues where the 7600's I have in place don't want to redistribute connected subnets into ospf, only seems to happen on the SUP720-3b image, and have the issue with 12.2(33)SRD(2a|3) Anyone else run into this issue?, So far, TAC can't reproduce it. I'm considering

Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

We had a similar situation with rsp720's and sup720's, and under each l3 vlan interface, had to add 'mls qos bridged' for the rate-limiting to work as expected, as well as the other mls commands you have configured on the trunk port in your example below On 03/03/2010 01:43 PM, Sharlon Carty

Re: [c-nsp] Currently recommended Stable IOS for 760x?

SRD2a and SRD3 on the sup720-3b has a bug where you can't check ospf neighbor relationships via snmp, if that's a consideration. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Mikael Abrahamsson Sent: Wed 3/3/2010 10:53 PM To: Lasher, Donn Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Question - VLAN tagging Catalyst 6500 to Linux Host

Bonded interfaces aside (I haven't done it with bonded interfaces, so I'm not sure) You'll want to use the vconfig command in linux to create your vlan sub-interfaces. Different distributions package it under different names. I think it's vlan under debian. Basic syntax will be something

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

I started looking into this, as I'm in a similar situation as Eric, and found that newer versions of OpenNMS does 99% of what I'm doing with Nagios and Cacti now, so I'm in a slow migration to that. Might be worth checking out the 1.7.x releases, a lot of new features have been added. I'll

[c-nsp] PPPoE termination on ES+20/12.2(33)SRE1

unclassified mac-address ! ! interface Virtual-Template1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 no ip proxy-arp peer default ip address pool BRAS-DSL ppp authentication chap ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address xx.xx.xx.1 255.255.255.0 ! --- -- Walter Keen ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Logging Server

Logging as in Syslog (ksyslogd), netflow (nfsen), or authentication/authorization for configuration (tacacs+ from shrubbery.net) If anyone has suggestions other than the above, especially for netflow, I'd love to hear them. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on

Re: [c-nsp] OpenSource Cisco Monitoring Tool

We use opennms and love it's trap handling capabilities. On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Jimmy Stewpot wrote: Check out zenoss http://www.zenoss.com/ - Original Message - From: arar_...@yahoo.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, 4 August, 2010 1:01:05 PM Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] Forwarding bandwidth vs. Switching bandwidth

Yes, like a 2GB circuit, in reality is 1Gb bidirectional. That funny marketing math. if (marketing=true) then (throughput=unidirectional-rate*2) On 08/04/2010 01:39 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: It's really quite simple: 48x1G downlinks + 2x10G uplinks + 2x10G stacking = 88G

Re: [c-nsp] 10GBase-LX4 and OM2 fibre -- MCP?

Based on the following, you might have too much light. From : http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/product_bulletin_c25-530836.html Notes for LX4: 1. In some cases, customers might experience that a link would be operating properly over OM2 fiber type without MCP. 2.

[c-nsp] Radius and choosing ip-local pool on 7600, PPP termination

20:15:47.827: AAA/ATTR(1403): cursor init: 1BF64960 1C9C32C8 none none -- Walter Keen Network Technician RAINIER CONNECT P 360.832.4024 F 360.832.4713 C 253.302.0194 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] cisco simulators

GNS/Dynamips works great, until you get to switching, where options are limited (to the 16-ESW card provided you have an IOS capable of using it) On 09/03/2010 03:47 PM, snort bsd wrote: Hi, all: What is the best simulator for ccie lab? thanks

Re: [c-nsp] Multihoming

Not many options for you I'm afraid. Some people filter out routes smaller than a /24. Even if you had a /24 from ISP1, you would then have to get their permission to have ISP2 advertise it. Most aren't willing to do this. Is a micro (/24) allocation from ARIN (if in the US) a

[c-nsp] IS-IS on L3 vlan interfaces

I'm having some trouble getting (integraded) IS-IS to form an adjacency over a L3 vlan that has 3 routers in it. It's on a Cisco 7600 series with 12.2(33)SRE code, however if I configure the vlan interface with the network type point-to-point, it comes up as expected. Since they all have dot1q

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS on L3 vlan interfaces

@puck.nether.net Cc: Walter Keen Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS on L3 vlan interfaces On Saturday, May 28, 2011 08:38:48 AM Walter Keen wrote: Does anyone have experience with this sort of issue? I get as far as, with debug isis adj, I can see router A send packets, and B/C (all in the same ethernet segment

[c-nsp] Fw: IS-IS on L3 vlan interfaces

Forgot to cc the list, sorry Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless -Original message- From: Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net To: mti...@globaltransit.net Sent: Sun, May 29, 2011 18:29:12 GMT+00:00 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS on L3 vlan interfaces

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS on L3 vlan interfaces

/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect Office: 360-832-4024 Cell: 253-302-0194

Re: [c-nsp] Cacti graph on same interface

-nsp/ -- Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect Office: 360-832-4024 Cell: 253-302-0194 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] improving last-mile VDSL2 circuit between two Cisco routers

Because you are essential increasing the gauge of wire, and therefore decreasing the resistance, you *should* have less loss. Telco's have used this in the past to extend DSL beyond the distance limitations before, (although not common, each pair in the ground is not a cheap commodity) If

Re: [c-nsp] Cable modems that support ipsec

You might want to look at putting the relevant modems in a vrf, if that design model works for you. Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect (P) 360-832-4024 (C) 253-302-0194 On 07/27/2011 03:15 PM, Jason Ellison wrote: All, Does anyone know of any cable modems that support IPSEC

Re: [c-nsp] Inter router BGP network tuning pointer?

You can buy Cisco Press eBooks from http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/index.asp, in PDF format I think, or there's always the Kindle versions, for some of them, if you have a kindle. It appears that the eBook format is not available for all books however the one you list below is available

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206 overloading every four hours

What are the npe/mem specs of this box, and how many bgp peers are you getting partial or full routes from? Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect (P) 360-832-4024 (C) 253-302-0194 On 09/19/2011 11:40 AM, Joseph Mays wrote: Recently started receiving a full BGP table on a cisco 7206

[c-nsp] zx sfp with DOM

Anyone have recommendations for 3rd party DOM ZX singlemode sfp for 7600 series routers running 12.2(33)SRE* code? Have a non-DOM optic and have issues with that link, looking for reporting that a DOM optic would give such as light levels, etc. Found this, but wanted to know if anyone had

Re: [c-nsp] zx sfp with DOM

It's on a 6724-SFP... Thanks On 10/14/2011 12:25 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 10/14/2011 12:43 AM, Walter Keen wrote: Anyone have recommendations for 3rd party DOM ZX singlemode sfp for 7600 series routers running 12.2(33)SRE* code? Have a non-DOM optic and have issues with that link, looking

Re: [c-nsp] best way to terminate channelized oc-3?

if that happens to be a concern. -- Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect Office: 360-832-4024 Cell: 253-302-0194 On 10/18/2011 01:38 PM, randal k wrote: Hive Mind, We're terminating an army of T1s in various locations on multiple DS3s, and are looking at consolidating a couple key points into OC3s

[c-nsp] Problem with 7200 and 12.2(33)SRE upgrade

listed in 'sh ver' output -- Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect (cell) 253-302-0194 (desk) 360-832-4024 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] SNMP monitoring routing table over time

, nexthop, etc) is available via snmp on the ip-route mib I believe, and needs to stay fairly generic, or equipment-agnostic. Does anyone know of an existing project to do this before I start trying to make one? Walter Keen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Adding a SUP720-3BXL standby SUP question

If budgets allow for it, a 6509 chassis can be had very cheaply through grey market resellers, and you'd end up with a spare. - Original Message - From: Lee Starnes lee.t.star...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1:14:27 PM Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] CT3 Timing issue

In most cases, a topology like this will have the ONS's synced to GPS time, or some accurate clock (or line clocking if your ONS connects to another provider, but GPS is typically preferred) and then I would DEFINITELY use line clocking on the PA-MC-T3, unless you have the capability through a

Re: [c-nsp] CT3 Timing issue

To: Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 3:41:57 PM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CT3 Timing issue Yeah. We have external BITS clocks, and secondary timing from the local exchange carrier. I will try line timing after hours tonight. If I

Re: [c-nsp] GNS3 Multiple Instances

I have not tried this, but I would imagine you could run multiple hypervisors (dynamips) on the same server or computer. If you goal is to have different seperated lab topologies not interacting with each other, my best guess would be 'maybe' but you would have to make sure you had no UDP

Re: [c-nsp] GNS3 Multiple Instances

The example Jeffery had should work, just like this example: http://www.cciezone.com/?p=111 However your files have the same port number for both hypervisors. You MUST give them different port numbers. (ie: localhost:7202 for the first one,and localhost:7203 for the second perhaps) you

Re: [c-nsp] Best Ipam software?

We're currently using IPPlan without any major issues. newer versions support v6, and has a multi-customer model supporting the idea of the same ip space being used across multiple customers - Original Message - From: Gustav Ulander gustav.ulan...@steria.se To:

Re: [c-nsp] WS-SUP720-3B and DOM/DDM enabled SFPs

I can verify a generic one works on SUP720-3b running 12.2(33)SRE But not on any of the linecards we have, like 6724-sfp. This one's not in use. core-1#sh int gi8/1 transceiver Transceiver monitoring is disabled for all interfaces. ITU Channel not available (Wavelength not

[c-nsp] C7600/ES+ double tagged termination issue

8A6AD4C 9725880 972592C 8A6B8C4 8A6BAA8 8A5B694 8A5B7DC 9725880 *Sep 20 12:01:10.771: %SYS-DFC2-3-BADLIST_DESTROY: Removed a non-empty list(2D487D60, name: AVLDup list), having 1 elements -Process= SSM connection manager, ipl= 0, pid= 190 Walter Keen Network Engineer Rainier Connect

Re: [c-nsp] transparent lan via asr9k and calix c7 (ftth olt)

OSPF) to not be dropped. All of our Calix GPON use is strictly providing layer 2 transport and not using their layer 3 features. I would guess that Calix would use the same terminology in the C7 as in the E7. Walter Keen Network Engineer RAINIER CONNECT C 253.302.0194 P 360.832.4024

Re: [c-nsp] Bundle member issue

Take a look at UDLD. If router A and router B have a fiber cable between them, and one strand, but not the other gets cut. Lets say the strand that router A is using for TX (and therefore router B is using it for RX) Router B should realize the link is down (likely in a UP/DOWN state),