Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k RSP440

6.4.x if I'm not mistaken. RSP440 has no 64 bit support last I read. On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 11:09 AM N. Max Pierson wrote: > Hi List, > > We're trying to figure out what the last train of XR software that can run > on the RSP440 for a 9006. We're running 6.2 right now but I can't seem to > find

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Maximum Prefix limit on Edge routers

Yes this is a common practice to follow for extra security measures. In the off chance a provider starts flooding your network with more than what is required it will safe guard your network. You can set a slightly higher warning threshold. Usually more prevalent in MPLS environments as there

[c-nsp] Nexus 7k F2E line cards vs F3 vs M3

As it appears the F2E line cards are terrible at dequeuing packets quick enough across a port-channeled application. There was an incident where traffic got pinned to one link from the same source/destination causing input discards due to back pressure from VoQ drops/congestion on some

[c-nsp] Cisco ONS15454 MSPP controller upgrades

Is there any good documentation online of upgrading the software on the ONS15454 platform? (MSPP, not MSTP). I know this platform is way end of life but unfortunately optical MUX's will just run until they are decom'd usually. The current MSPPs are managed via a CTC over a ring topology.

[c-nsp] Nexus 5k vs 9k egress/ingress buffers

Hello, Does anyone have experience with using Nexus 5k vs 9k in regards to egress buffers/ingress buffers? We have found the 7ks to be inadequate with regards to chatty access layer devices. Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] ASR9000 and nV edge cluster feature

As per Cisco documentation the nV edge cluster feature is supported only up to 5.3.4. While I understand this is the "official documentation" has anyone used ASR9000 nV edge clustered devices past 5.3.4 (specially in the 6.X.X line?). The aggregate QOS feature comes available in 6.0.1 which is

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 7k with F2e line cards and egress queuing

m and final > result. Fortunately, we found a workaround to reroute traffic to > different path. Now it's coming to the same 10G egress ports from > another 100G port-channel although 100G are on the same linecards as > that were dropping packets. > Any advice would be appreciated. >

[c-nsp] Nexus 7k with F2e line cards and egress queuing

I am hoping some of you Cisco Nexus veterans out there could shed some light on this issue or provide some insight if this has been encountered before. Has anyone had egress VQ Congestion issues on the Nexus 7k using F2e line cards causing input discards? There has been intentional influx of

[c-nsp] ASR900 tech specs for L2VPN MPLS over GRE

I have been having a hard time trying to find out if the ASR900 (902/903) platform has MPLS over GRE capability. Specifically interested in doing L2VPN over GRE (for MPLS PW). Does anyone know if this platform is capable of such feature? Would anyone also know if using the A900-RSP2A-128 with

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 Input MIB CRC

The rate at which these CRCs come in so quick that it is difficult to clear both the router and switch counters at the same time to get an exact match. However, bear in mind the human delay is 1-2 seconds between hitting "enter" to clear the counters on the devices, yes they do appear to match on

[c-nsp] ASR9000 Input MIB CRC

I have tried researching this but have not found any substance on this type of error. I have an ASR9000 with a Layer3 Bundle-Eth connected to a VPC Nexus5596. Both sides run LACP active/active. The ports are connected via 10G XFP 10G-SR and 10G SFP+ 10G-SR (OM3 Fiber) One of the Bundle members

Re: [c-nsp] A9K-SIP-700 and SPA compatibility

ASR 9000 SIP-700 line cards are TDM only. They do not support Ethernet MPAs or SPAs. As such they are neither a Trident, Typhoon or Tomahawk like card. Curtis On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, 6:44 PM Lee Starnes Hello everyone. I am having difficulty in finding any documentation on > Cisco's site that

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Subscription based licenses

r renew licenses). > > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/virtual-routers/configuration/guide/b-xrv9k-cg/b-xrv9k-cg_chapter_01001.html > > Regards, > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:38 AM Curtis Piehler > wrote: > >> Does anyone have any insight on how often you need

[c-nsp] Cisco Subscription based licenses

Does anyone have any insight on how often you need to pay for the new subscription based licenses? For example: S-XRV-SUB-RTU which is the replacement for the former perpetual based licenses. What happens when the subscription is not paid in a timely manner? I'm having trouble finding

[c-nsp] LDP based VPLS on IOS-XR

Curious to see if anyone else has had this issue. Currently running IOS XR 5.1.3 on ASR9000 routers. Yes it's old but has been stable. RSP-4Gs with Typhoon like cards (MOD80-TR). Issue is thus: Configured LDP based VPLS with a bridge group and bridge domain. Max MAC limit of 500. I used one

[c-nsp] ASR9000 ABF/ePBR

So I have been attempting to use IOS-XR ABF (Access List Based Forwarding) to implement a "catch-all" next-hop of a destination within the same LAN (back out the same interface the packet arrived on). Cisco documentation indicates this would fall under the "for-us" rule and not work by default.

[c-nsp] IOS-XR cfgmgr-rp process restart

Trying to google this but can not find actual data. Does anyone know if restarting process cfgmgr-rp is a service impacting operation? For example if I find the process to be utilizing more memory than it should I would like to restart it. Curtis ___

[c-nsp] IOS XRv 9000 Default Route Scale

I'm having trouble finding this specification. What is the default route scale on the IOS XRv 9000 (S-XRV9000-RTU). I presume without S-XRV9000-VRR-1M the router would just act as a simple client or non-client on the network? Curtis ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] BGP-ORR vRR/IOS-XRv

Thank you, with the general RR concerns out of the way I'd like to hear if anyone has specific BGP ORR experience in an IOS-XRv environment. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, 6:53 PM Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 22/Mar/18 00:45, Curtis Piehler wrote: > > Sorry I

Re: [c-nsp] BGP-ORR vRR/IOS-XRv

Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: On 18/Mar/18 22:20, Curtis Piehler wrote: BGP-ORR looks to be an attractive technology to utilize instead of full meshing many standard RRs. I was hoping people could share some insight on this topic since there is not so much real world scenarios out

[c-nsp] BGP-ORR vRR/IOS-XRv

BGP-ORR looks to be an attractive technology to utilize instead of full meshing many standard RRs. I was hoping people could share some insight on this topic since there is not so much real world scenarios out there documented. This is geared towards an IOS-XRv ASR9K deployment. - When

[c-nsp] BGP-ORR vRR/IOS-XRv

I realize my previous post about MCID across a RR backbone generated various difference in opinions so hopefully this topic is a bit more cut and dry. BGP-ORR looks to be an attractive technology to utilize instead of full meshing many standard RRs. I was hoping people could share some insight

[c-nsp] IOS-XR BGP RR MCID (Multiple Cluster ID)

I presume this is supported in IOS-XR but just making sure. A network across the country is split up into multiple regions. Each region housing two RRs where the local region clients peer with them. Instead of full meshing all of the regional RR consider a tiered topology. 3-4 of the regional RR

[c-nsp] Cisco Router IRB

I am trying to find specifications on IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging). Specifically pertaining to ISR-G2 routers. Is there a throughput limitation specific to IRB on different routers? Can a router L3 BVI Interface serve as a DHCP server for devices within the Layer 2 bridging domain

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ONS TCC2P Question

I presume you have a MSTP Platform based on that code base. We use a MSPP so the latest supported release is 9.2.1.3. On Dec 6, 2017 5:30 PM, "Aaron" wrote: > We are doing every 5 min. Running 10.6.2. Also we are not doing anything > but amplification. > > > > On Wed, Dec

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ONS TCC2P Question

In fact we do. We are pulling full snmp via SolarWinds with traps being sent. Oddly enough we have two other 15454 in a ring (minus the DS3XM12 cards) that don't have this issue. On Dec 6, 2017 2:57 PM, "Brandon Applegate" wrote: > In a former life we had this happen all the

[c-nsp] Cisco ONS TCC2P Question

Would you guys deem two bad TCC2P Cards if the Memory MEM-LOW and then MEM-GONE are thrown which proceeds a reset of the active card? Or... could this be just too many alarms generated over the course of a few months causing the memory to deplete on them? The active TCC2P card appears to deplete

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2960G not passing DHCP

Including NSP On Oct 22, 2017 7:33 PM, "Curtis Piehler" <cpiehl...@gmail.com> wrote: > No security features running and no DHCP snooping. There are 3 Raritan > PDUs and one Fortigate connected to the 2960G. All of them exhibiting the > same behavior. No dhcp

[c-nsp] Cisco 2960G not passing DHCP

I'm racking my brains out on this yet it seems so simple unless I am encountering a bug. I have several host devices connected to the following switch, Firewalls/PDUs, etc...: Switch Ports Model SW VersionSW Image -- - - --

Re: [c-nsp] CEF issues this weekend

Thank you, Oddly enough the issues were related for me. When this issue first was seen is when the ipv4 CEF of some of my routers ceased to update. I blocked the offending /23 from entering my network and ipv4 CEF resumes normal. It's also amazing how the offending AS hasn't fixed this yet and

[c-nsp] CEF issues this weekend

Anyone seeing CEF issues since 6:19 PM EST on 9/29? Saw a report that someone announced a 2200+ byte AS path around the same time. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

It is a matter of managing labels on the devices that terminate the attachment circuits. You don't need to manage the P routers in between. Coming from a Smart Edge world years ago we did static PWs. When we migrated to ASR9Ks static labeling was the only way I could interopt with the Smart

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

If you use a static label MTUs should not matter. If you do not use a static label aka Dynamic PW then both segments will not come up unless MTUs match. On Sep 15, 2017 10:31 PM, "Aaron Gould" wrote: > Thanks Curtis, Are you saying that mtu’s only matter if you force a static

Re: [c-nsp] config example xconnent between ASR9K and 6500

Unless you force a static label, then MTUs don't matter :) On Sep 15, 2017 10:11 PM, "Aaron Gould" wrote: > > I put the MTU show command below, because we all know how much MTU is a > gotcha in MPLS L2VPN's... > > ** > > 9k... > >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9010 problem - CRC ERROR - DATA PATH FAILED

What XR version? On Jun 3, 2017 7:47 PM, "Randy via cisco-nsp" wrote: ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Typhoon support on XRe

Seriously? I thought only Trident cards ended support in 5.3.X. On May 1, 2017 8:52 AM, "Lukas Tribus" wrote: Hello Christian, > does someone know for sure that XRe will never support Typhoon based > linecards? Yes (to my surprise), IOS XR 64bit does not support Typhoon

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 SFP/XFP Input Error troubleshooting

> > Cheers, > > JF > > *Jean-François Dubé* > Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP > *Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux* > *Vidéotron* > > "cisco-nsp" <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> a écrit sur 2017-04-02 > 21:21:04 : > > > De

[c-nsp] ASR1000 Aggregate EtherChannel QoS

I am speaking specifically to this document: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-16/qos-mqc-xe-16-book/aggregate-etherchannel-quality-of-service.html Has anyone utilized this feature on the ASR1000 platform? Does anyone know if this works for QinQ

[c-nsp] ASR9000 SFP/XFP Input Error troubleshooting

Hello all, I was wondering if anyone could help me out with some Input Error Troubleshooting. This mostly pertains to XFPs. I am using a mix of LR, SR and ER XFPs on my routers. I notice the Input Errors increment every now and again throughout the day. It isn't excessive but mostly like ones

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 A9K-2T20GE-B weird port issue

This is occurring on Fiber ports and I do not have Auto-Neg on. It is disabled by default and I normally do not enable Auto-Neg. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > > I've just noticed this weird issue recently. Whenever we have a port go > > down

[c-nsp] ASR9000 A9K-2T20GE-B weird port issue

I've just noticed this weird issue recently. Whenever we have a port go down for circuit related issues and recover I have to manually do a shut/commit, no shut/commit to bring the interface up/up. It is not related to a specific type of optic because I am using different Cisco branded ones (LX

[c-nsp] BGP Route Reflector Case

This is more of a design question but looking to implement on IOS-XR if it's possible. Can a router act as a dual purpose route reflector? What I mean by that, can it serve the purpose of both a local market route reflector and regional route reflector? Basically having to peer a bunch of local

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Family

I did some more research and all this is a glorified Metro E Router that is modular. The RSP3Cs only support a max of 192,000 IPV4 Routes. Now I'm looking at the 1006-Xs. I find that the ASR1000 family is not available under the Cisco Power Calculator. Does anyone know a place where I can

[c-nsp] ASR900 Family

Does anyone have any experience with this family? We were looking at an ASR1006 however the power requirement was too much (required to be fused to a 50A breaker) on DC.. I did find the ASR903 a smaller foot print capable of some 10G capacity and OC3/OC12 which is all that we would need.

[c-nsp] Catalyst 6504-E memory reallocation

Is it possible that the older Catalyst 6504 with SUP720-3BXL can reclaim unused memory? For instance say I have two DIA providers into a 6504 taking in two full copies of the Internet routing table (IPV4). Knowing the low memory availability on the 3BXL cards (1G) I do not want to chance taking

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9006/9010 Multihop BFD

uot;MP download state" when you execute #sh bfd session > destination detail > > Best Regards, > Gobinath > > On 16 Dec 2016 05:34, "Curtis Piehler" <cpiehl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Curious if anyone has encountered this before. >> >> Ru

[c-nsp] ASR9006/9010 Multihop BFD

Curious if anyone has encountered this before. Running 5.1.3 Trying to establish BFD Multihop underlying BGP with a router on site. I have the Multipath parameters set for the appropriate line cards. The far side router indicates it is transmitting BFD packets but not receiving any. The ASR9k

Re: [c-nsp] 720-3BXL IOS 15

Thank guys, I think the best course of action is to change to default only in ipv4 and then upgrading would be more feasible. On Nov 16, 2016 6:29 AM, "Peter Rathlev" <pe...@rathlev.dk> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:35 -0500, Curtis Piehler wrote: > > Does anyon

Re: [c-nsp] 720-3BXL IOS 15

If I change my ipv4 table to default only this would be better for a 15 IOS? On Nov 15, 2016 4:41 PM, Rolf Hanßen wrote: > Hi Curtis, > > that combination does not sound good to me. > I think you will run into memory issues. > > kind regards > Rolf > > > > Does anyone have any

[c-nsp] 720-3BXL IOS 15

Does anyone have any suggested 15.x Versions for the 720-3BXL Cards? I have a couple of 7606 routers that have a need to run BFD + BGP within a VRF Instance. The current 12.2(33)SRB3 does not allow this. The router takes in 3 full copies of the Internet routing table as well as some very light

Re: [c-nsp] IPsec on IOS-XR?

What Ted said :) unless you want to drop 5 USD on 1 VSM it is more cost effective to buy a smaller 1k for a dedicated ipsec endpoint On Oct 26, 2016 8:57 AM, "Hank Nussbacher" <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > On 26/10/2016 15:26, Curtis Piehler wrote: > > I h

Re: [c-nsp] IPsec on IOS-XR?

You are better off buying an ASR1000. They are designed to do ipsec at near line rate On Oct 26, 2016 8:13 AM, "Hank Nussbacher" wrote: I am following the IPsec example here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/generic-

Re: [c-nsp] 3rd party dwdm 80km optics in asr 9001

I am rather shocked this doesn't work. I'm not sure about the 9001 however we use varies MPAs for the 9006/9010 with third party dwdm xfp/sfp+ no issues. On Sep 28, 2016 6:42 AM, "Gustav Ulander" wrote: > Hello. > > Iam woundering if anyone has had issues

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

Exactly! On the 6500/7600 platforms you can't have your cake and eat it :) On Sep 16, 2016 7:32 AM, "Gert Doering" wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:13:54PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > I expected the SP and the RP to be orthogonal to each other ... > >

Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 VLAN cannot be assigned to a routed port sub-if?

If the card is switching type card then yes it does care and draws from the internal VLAN database. The true routed cards (SPA) are not part of the internal VLAN database. I ran into this on 7600 routers with WS line cards. However the SPA cards in the chassis did not draw from the internal

Re: [c-nsp] BGP full feeds on ASR1k

For what it's worth, I have some 9ks with RSP-4Gs taking in 3 full ipv4 routes. On average there is 800M - 1.2G free. That is also with VPNV4. The number of full ipv4 routes is very close to 600k. On Sep 4, 2016 6:37 PM, "Nick Cutting" wrote: > Sorry - I meant 8Gb ram,

[c-nsp] N5k provider backbone bridging

I know Nexus 5ks do not support straight up provider backbone bridging but is there any way to emulate such a thing? Scenario is thus: Two N5596 uplink to two ASR9000 "Core routers". Any VLAN in this VDC is considered infrastructure. A couple of hosts connect to the N5596 which are VPC'd into

Re: [c-nsp] Optic Shutdown TX State?

-40.00 it does not transmit anything. On Aug 4, 2016 2:27 PM, "Tim Durack" wrote: > Question: when an optic is "shutdown" on a router, what is the state of the > transmitter? > > (10G DWDM SFP+ optic, EDFA amplified link etc...) > > -- > Tim:> >

Re: [c-nsp] Weird throughput issue

Oh right. I temporarily move the wan to an svi on the cat4900 On Jul 24, 2016 6:09 PM, "Andrew Miehs" <and...@2sheds.de> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Curtis Piehler <cpiehl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Thank you f

Re: [c-nsp] Weird throughput issue

I can pass 1500 byte packets with the dfbit set no packet loss. On Jul 24, 2016 3:30 PM, "Juergen Marenda" wrote: > > Check MTU on the links provided, probably some (vlan-/mpls-/...)tags does > not fit. > > > > ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] Weird throughput issue

90/90. I've also applied 90M shapers on both ends of the WAN to avoid hitting the carrier policers in the middle and it had no effect. Curtis On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Miehs <and...@2sheds.de> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Curtis Piehler <cpiehl...@gmail.

[c-nsp] Weird throughput issue

I've been scratching my head over the past week on this issue as it doesn't make any sense but here are the details. I have a 100M circuit that is sold through a transport provider to an ILEC (Type 2). The circuit comes into one of our facilities with the following equipment: Customer Site

Re: [c-nsp] Classic IOS shared policy instance

t will apply for all traffic in the sub > interfaces. > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Curtis Piehler <cpiehl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> In simpler terms I am looking for a shared token bucket configuration >> across multiple sub-interfaces on the classic IOS p

Re: [c-nsp] Classic IOS shared policy instance

In simpler terms I am looking for a shared token bucket configuration across multiple sub-interfaces on the classic IOS platform On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Curtis Piehler <cpiehl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a particular scenario doing some QoS on classic IOS devices. > >

[c-nsp] Classic IOS shared policy instance

I have a particular scenario doing some QoS on classic IOS devices. I have two WAN sub-interfaces part of a physical interface and a service policy defined that shapes the "WAN" to 100M. Is there a way I can make both sub-interfaces derive from this one policy-map. On an ASR9000 I know you can

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000/IOS-XR NAT/PAT

t; > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Nick Hilliard > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 11:06 AM > To: Curtis Piehler > Cc: Cisco Network Service Providers > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000/IOS-XR NAT/PAT > > Cu

[c-nsp] ASR9000/IOS-XR NAT/PAT

I've been reading documentation online about NAT/PAT on an ASR9k Router. Is it a requirement to have a VSM/ISM in the chassis to perform regular IPv4 PAT and/or IPv4 to IPv6 translations? Thanks Curtis ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR 9k transporting QinQ traffic

Make sure the port mtu is higher to allow for additional vlan tags. 4 byte per vlan. On Jul 14, 2016 7:11 AM, "David Wilkinson" wrote: > Hi, > > We are in the process of migrating some of our links over to Cisco ASR > 9006, they are running IOS XR 5.3.3. > > Normal

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

So going from 5.1.X to 6.X.X will likely involve fpd upgrades? I've been hit by the SNMP OID bug that consumes memory over time but I can hold out by restarting the SNMP process every once in a while. On Jul 13, 2016 4:39 PM, "Gert Doering" wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 13,

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

I agree with Mack. The XR MPLS support is more friendly and there are tons of options. They do have 40 port 1G MPAs and 8 PORT 10G MPAs but they are still quite expensive from what I've seen. You would also need at minimum a MOD-80 or really a MOD-160 for that kind density on a 9k. They do

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

isco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Curtis Piehler > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 12:49 PM > To: Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> > Cc: Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org>; cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

So we know about the memory constraint on the 3BXLs but what happens if the memory usage actually hits 90%? Will the SUP still allow VTY sessions? I know on the NPEs for the 7200s once 90% is reached the router will rejecting all VTY attempts. On Jul 6, 2016 3:21 AM, "Gert Doering"

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Honestly with the aging hardware for the 6500s and 7600s I would go with an ASR1004/6. The only thing you won't have is port density like on a 6500. Obviously a 6500 is a switch and a 1004/6 is a router. If you need the port density you can go with the ASR1006-X which has EPAs (Less room for

[c-nsp] ASR1000 SIP10 Oversubscription

Concerning the SIP10 cards for the ASR1000. I know the total bandwidth allotted on the card is 10G and it allows for a 2:1 oversubscription before SPA cards start to shut down. However, how is the oversubscription calculated? Is it based on the actual throughput the SIP-10/SPAs are performing?

Re: [c-nsp] BGP blackhole community config

Usually that is the case where your sent the community as ISP:NN. However in this case your provider is using 64682:0 to denote traffic as blackhole. Not an issue perse but that's what they are telling you is what they honor as far as communities coming into their network. On Jun 19, 2016 7:38

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9000 Import/Exporting between two VRFs

My issue with using VASI interaces is that I do not have a MSB card. On Jun 14, 2016 9:11 PM, "Steve Dodd" <steve.d...@sungardas.com> wrote: > This seems like a good use case for VASI interfaces. > > Thanks, > Steve > > On 6/14/16, 3:22 PM, "cisco-nsp on

[c-nsp] ASR9000 Import/Exporting between two VRFs

Hello, Quite the curious case here. An ASR9000 router has two VRFs. For simplicity sake let's call them VRF A and VRF B. VRF A and VRF B need to be able to see each other's routes via importing and exporting however here's the catch. I need VRF A to see VRF B's routes and vice versa but with

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

Thanks for the explanation guys. On Jun 9, 2016 8:44 PM, "Adam Vitkovsky" <adam.vitkov...@gamma.co.uk> wrote: > > Curtis Piehler > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 7:35 PM > > > > I have quite a scenario here that we are working on testing in the la

[c-nsp] MPLS Routing with PBR

I have quite a scenario here that we are working on testing in the lab but wanted to know if anyone has experience in this. In this scenario there are a few PE routers (ASR9K) connected to each other with a "firewall" connecting to one of the PE routers. Two different PE routers have a customer

Re: [c-nsp] QinQ on NS-OX/Nexus

I've searched for this before and I was not able to find the functionality, even on the 5ks. The reason being in my belief is the Nexus platform is designed for datacenter switching. QinQ is more of a metro/carrier type functionality. With the QinQ SVI your egress interface would need to be

[c-nsp] ASR1000 licencing

I have been researching the licencing models and I see Cisco's notes that it is no longer enforced (honor based). For an ASR1006 if I do not obtain the licence what happens? Does it just throw nuisance alarms in the logs like an ASR9000 if you do not obtain the licence for the NPU? Ideally

[c-nsp] ASR1000 RP1 vs RP2

I see the main difference between the two is the 32 bit OS vs a 64 bit and 1.5 single core vs a 2.2 dual core. Yes the memory is increased and hard drive space. If a 1006 will be used for some DS1 and Ethernet termination would an RP1 be enough? I could also do with an ESP20 and SIP10s since

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1006 Routers

Ah now I understand better. I thought the RP did everything like the RSP of an ASR9000 On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Nathan Ward <cisco-...@daork.net> wrote: > > On 4/06/2016, at 11:19, Curtis Piehler <cpiehl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it a requirement to have an ESP

[c-nsp] ASR1006 Routers

Is it a requirement to have an ESP in the chassis? I know what the they are supposed to be used for (offload network services). If the router is going to be used for doing just packet forwarding and some QOS is it really needed in the chassis? Thanks Curtis