Re: [cisco-voip] Translation Profile out on voice port

The order in which digit manipulation is processed on an outbound POTS dial peer is: 1. Outbound Dial-Peer 1. Translation Profile 2. CLID 3. Digit Strip 4. Prefix Digits 5. Forward Digits 2. Outbound Voice Port 1. Translation Profile Source: CVOICE You'r

Re: [cisco-voip] Translation Profile out on voice port

Exactly, I will send a debug confirming that once I have access to the router. Best Regards, Ahmed Elnagar | CCIE#24697 Voice > On Mar 19, 2015, at 5:09 AM, Daniel Pagan wrote: > > Ahmed – > > Not sure if I completely follow but are you concerned about the order of > operations for digit man

Re: [cisco-voip] Translation Profile out on voice port

Ahmed - Not sure if I completely follow but are you concerned about the order of operations for digit manipulation in IOS? If you are then I would say your expectation would be correct with digit manipulation in IOS occurring in the following steps and in the following order: incoming voice-po

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

On 19/03/15 10:47, Anthony Holloway wrote: > Have you seen this post? I'm not sure if it applies to your environment > or not, but I thought I'd throw it your way anyway. > > https://greiginsydney.com/hey-um-dont-record-messages-im-on-holidays/ I did come across it when searching, but it looks l

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Have you seen this post? I'm not sure if it applies to your environment or not, but I thought I'd throw it your way anyway. https://greiginsydney.com/hey-um-dont-record-messages-im-on-holidays/ On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:34 AM James Andrewartha < jandrewar...@ccgs.wa.edu.au> wrote: > Hi list, >

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

I'm showing my age here, but in the Nortel mailing list I used to be apart of, everyone was aware if you needed a phone to do something wacky, you needed to look at the sandman. This might work for you. http://www.sandman.com/Wizard.html#CPCGenerator On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:31 PM, James Andre

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

On 18/03/15 23:55, Daniel Pagan wrote: > Definitely makes sense and what I thought you were trying to achieve. If this > is the case, then rejecting the call via xlate or route patterns won't do - > the call will be rejected instead of connecting and then being disconnected. > You'll more than l

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

What is really amazing offer. I really need that. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Tanner Ezell Date: 03/18/2015 12:09 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Matthew Loraditch Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Documentin

[cisco-voip] Translation Profile out on voice port

Hi all; It has been a very long time since I posted to the mailing list but you are always the "gateway of last resort" to find an expert reply :) I was testing voice translation rules on a VGW with the below setup I want someone to be able to call extensions "1XXX" from a site connecte

[cisco-voip] Jabber Presence indicator on phone won't change when user changes presense

The Presense Indicator (top left) will not switch on the user's Jabber window, nor will it change for other users looking him up in the directory. For example he will try to switch it to 'Away' and it won't switch. Anybody see this? Thanks, Joe Loiacono__

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

For anyone interested shoot me an email off-list for access to a private beta (NDA required) coming up! On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Matthew Loraditch < mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote: > That would be amazing… > > > > Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA > Network Eng

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

That would be amazing… Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518 Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

Uh, hell yes Tanner! Got a sample to share? On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM Tanner Ezell wrote: > Just curious to poke the hornets nest here. > > Would anyone be interested in such a solution for UCCX scripts? (I'm > talking about Visio file generation [including full step configuration > info

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

Just curious to poke the hornets nest here. Would anyone be interested in such a solution for UCCX scripts? (I'm talking about Visio file generation [including full step configuration information], not screen shots of Steps..) On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Walenta, Philip wrote: > Years ago

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Definitely makes sense and what I thought you were trying to achieve. If this is the case, then rejecting the call via xlate or route patterns won't do - the call will be rejected instead of connecting and then being disconnected. You'll more than likely receive the standard recording from your

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Hi Dan, This is to transfer to from an Exchange UM AA where we want to hang up on the caller after playing a message (it's summer holidays and there's no-one to answer the call is the one that comes to mind). I want it to be a silent hangup, not give the caller a "this extension could not be fo

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

Years ago when I was doing a bunch of ICM I begged Cisco for a JSON or XML export or something for the scripts. Screenshots is still the only method of which I am aware. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Terry Oakley Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:33

Re: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

I echo that.. trying to document those scripts has been a challenge to say the least. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Burtch Sent: March 18, 2015 9:19 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script All: Does

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Very true. Just leave it unallocated and CCM doesn't have to do anything, but the caller will get annunciation. Thanks, Ryan Original Message From: Daniel Pagan Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:17 AM To: Ryan Huff ,James Andrewartha ,cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: R

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

hi guys, thanks! gonna try them in the lab first to figure out if i can put the device profile in the production partition. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Rob Dawson wrote: >This is the way I handle scenarios like this as well – create a > temporary partition for the DNs, etc. and use BAT

[cisco-voip] Documenting a Cisco ICM Script

*All*: Does anyone know of a good way to document a Cisco ICM script? All I do today is take a boat load of screen shots and add comments to them. Just wanted to know if anyone has a better system. Sincerely, Ryan Burtch ___ cisco-voip mailing li

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

The main question I have... if CUC is being used simply to hang-up on the calling party, what's the purpose of needing this migrated to CUCM instead of simply leaving the number unallocated? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that you're specifically looking for a method in CUCM where t

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

So if the CUC AA IS NOT playing a greeting and the AA is doing NOTHING but the after action of hang-up; you could just create a translation pattern that matches the called number (presumably, the called number is currently a CTI route point/DN that is forwarding to CUC, you would need to remove

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Yeah, CUC has Callers Hear: Nothing then After Greeting/Call Action: Hang Up. How would I dump the call? Select Route Option/Block this pattern: Call Rejected in the translation pattern? Thanks, James Andrewartha Network & Projects Engineer Christ Church Grammar School Claremont, Western Austra

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

This is the way I handle scenarios like this as well – create a temporary partition for the DNs, etc. and use BAT to bulk edit them when it is time to move to production. Having the profiles exposed shouldn’t cause any issues as long as the DNs are hidden. Rob From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-v

[cisco-voip] Device Package 6.0.1.3112-1 missing from CCO

Hi all, i know that it is ancient history but i need it desperately. Can someone explain to me why CUCM updates and files are not available on CCO. Even, files for 4.X are available but CUCM 6.0 is as never existed! BR Antonis ___ cisco-voip mailing l

Re: [cisco-voip] Latest Device Package 8.5.1-18135-1 Wrong MD5?

Hi all, yes it was wrong! Original file size was ~550 MB and after my TAC and research cisco uploaded the correct one (~750MB) BR Antonis On 27-Feb-15 11:25, Antonis Kouloglou wrote: Hi all, i have an opened TAC regarding that but i want your personal experience on that. I have downloaded th

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

So is CUC just so you can use the after action hang up technique or are you playing a greeting first? If your just hanging up and not playing a greeting, could you just catch the ingress call on a translation then just dump the call (or play the reorder tone)? Thanks, Ryan Original

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration strategy

Any elements that you are going to pre-stage that are a part of the dial plan (translations, route patterns, DNs, transformations ...etc) wilk all need to be isolated from your currently migrated phones. So the DNs on your device profiles would likely need to be in an isolated partition, but th

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

Hi James Cant think of a way in CUCM itself. A little TCL script on IOS box could do it though. Cheers, Tim Sent from my iPhone > On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:33, James Andrewartha > wrote: > > Hi list, > > Is there a way in CUCM to make an extension that hangs up on the other > end? Currently we