Re: [cisco-voip] Cluster setup with 2 Subs - Sub 2 did not pick up the load.

I realize you mentioned the IP addresses of the communications manager servers were listed in the phone's trust list however; keep in mind that if DNS/FQDNs are being used, the phones will also have to be able to resolve those FQDNs (otherwise, you'd likely experience something very similar to t

Re: [cisco-voip] Panic Button Solution?

While this still in allows for 2-way communication; an interim solution until the Informacast server is available again (that is your best option) is to have the far end phone auto answer on speaker and do a local side route pattern with a unique steering digit. Outside of that and assuming you

Re: [cisco-voip] Cluster setup with 2 Subs - Sub 2 did not pick up the load.

Sub 2 When I manually change TFTP server 1 to point to Sub 2 it asks me to erase the ITL, does that sound right ? Thx Gary From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Monday, 30 January 2017 11:42 PM To: Nathan Reeves mailto:nathan.a.ree...@gmail.com>> Cc: Gary_Bates_C

Re: [cisco-voip] IM&P Renew tomcat and ipsec certificates

Not sure which version you have but here is the Security Certificate Management chapter for version 10: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/cucos/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_C2F2626C_00_cucm-os-admin-guide-100/CUCM_BK_C2F2626C_00_cucm-os-admin-guide-100_chapter_01101.html Another good sou

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM settings

Depends on what type of "settings" you're talking about. From a 10,000 foot view, I'd say you could probably go to the bulk administration tool and use the general import export tool to dump out the enterprise parameters ... etc. Thanks, Ryan > On Feb 10, 2017, at 5:57 PM, cisco.voip wrote: >

[cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

Has anyone got Flexible JID to work via MRA for the Jabber client's INITIAL, registration? FJID is working fine internally for INITIAL registration (and then the bootstrap is cached with the actual user ID so after that, doesn't really matter). J4W 11.8 Exp c/e 8.7.1 CUCM / imp 11.0.1 (No LDAP,

[cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

Has anyone got Flexible JID to work via MRA for the Jabber client's INITIAL, registration? FJID is working fine internally for INITIAL registration (and then the bootstrap is cached with the actual user ID so after that, doesn't really matter). J4W 11.8 Exp c/e 8.7.1 CUCM / imp 11.0.1 (No LDAP,

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway blues

t; Single interface. > On a public IP BTW. > > > Ryan Huff @ 17/02/2017 20:48 -0300 dixit: >> How is your expressway E server configured? Single interface or door >> interfaces? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Feb 17, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Carlos

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway blues

ointer to a doc for tshooting, or arquitecture, or ... I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Ryan Huff @ 17/02/2017 21:00 -0300 dixit: Expressway servers on a stick are not fun. You should note, that using dual interfaces on the expressway E server is the recommended solution. Is there a reason

Re: [cisco-voip] Moving calls to/from jabber apps

There might be a mobility play there for your manager with audio (via the cellphone), but not a Jabber video call. On Feb 18, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: So, if someone answers a Jabber call on their mobile phone (via jabber client) and walks into their

Re: [cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

eld which it doesnt allow you to log in with, if you then change it to user id you can log in? Anyone else come across this? Regards Nick On 15 February 2017 at 18:15, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Has anyone got Flexible JID to work via MRA for the Jabber client's IN

Re: [cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

his is not supported. I'll log a case and get it added to the enhancement. Regards Nick On 27 February 2017 at 12:14, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I can confirm that FJID is not supported over MRA. There is a bug ID for an enhancement request. It's only got

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

Mobile Remote Access. At a 10,000 foot view; a way to register Cisco Jabber clients and Cisco IP 8800/7800 to Communications Manager without VPN (replaces phone proxy and phone vpn). It involves Cisco Expressway (VCS) servers that are configured like a standard reverse internet proxy (called a

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

Arguably, one of the coolest licensing things Cisco has done in awhile ;). Sent from my iPhone On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Brian Meade mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote: MRA is free now so just need to request the Expressway licensing through PUT. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Ben Amick mail

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

The caveat to the free license, even in version 8.9 I believe, is that if you do any sort of transform on the expressway (such as using a abbreviated dial pattern in call manager and then transforming it into the appropriate WebEx suffix domain in expressway C) does consume a RMS license. Thank

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

h rule they give you for it to not consume RMS licensing. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: The caveat to the free license, even in version 8.9 I believe, is that if you do any sort of transform on the expressway (such as using a abbreviated d

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 11.8 and XIAOMI MI smart phones

No they are not. However, I wouldn't re-sew the pants (CCM) to fit the wallet (XIAOMI) Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Rasim Duric mailto:rdu...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: We hit an issue with XIAOMI smart phones and Jabber 11.8. The Jabber phone service is working over MRA but NOT

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 11.8 and XIAOMI MI smart phones

No they are not. However, I wouldn't re-sew the pants (CCM) to fit the wallet (XIAOMI) Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Rasim Duric mailto:rdu...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote: We hit an issue with XIAOMI smart phones and Jabber 11.8. The Jabber phone service is working over MRA but NOT

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber / CTI and DNS/LDAP

Adam, I have had this happen before as well and came to the same eventual analysis too. My DNS were BIND VMs; what I did was add a second virtual NIC to the secondary DNS and gave it the primary's IP address (because my DNS servers were in two separate segments). Once the original was good, d

Re: [cisco-voip] far end camera control (additional ports?)

Lelio, FECC is UDP 3 -3 This is from the 10.6 planning guide: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/10_6/planning-guide/CJAB_BK_CD3376A0_00_cisco-jabber-106-planning-guide/CJAB_BK_CD3376A0_00_cisco-jabber-planning-guide_chapter_011.html#CJAB_RF_P3DE6354_00 This is

Re: [cisco-voip] Change IM address scheme

If it's still greyed out then one or more of the nodes is still reporting that one of those services is enabled. In certain older versions I've seen this happen even when the services were all disabled but because they were not disabled in the same order shown in the guide. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA question

Ahmed, The Expressway cluster (C or E) can have 6 member nodes (1 primary and 5 subordinate peer nodes). Here is the clustering guide for 8.7 (but all versions have an equivalent guide): http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X8-7/Cisco-Expressway-Cluster

Re: [cisco-voip] CUIC Reporting

You could create a "null queue" for each option that does nothing more than passthru the transfer to the intended destination. Then you could run reports on the "null queues" for how many calls come in to them. This is not very elegant and wouldn't scale very well, but works in limited scenari

Re: [cisco-voip] Fwd A Number

Assuming the unassigned DN is marked active. -Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ben Amick Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:32 AM To: David Zhars Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fwd A Number Even if you delete all the phones on a li

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone

In the TCT device profile for the Jabber iPhone; please verify that "Digest User" under "Protocol Specific Information" is set to the correct owning user and "Enable Sip Digest Authentication" is set to "Enable" under "Product Specific Configuration Layout". Thanks, Ryan On Mar 23, 2017, at 2

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone

. any other thing which you can think off? Regards Naray From: Ryan Huff Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:30 PM To: naresh rathore Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone In the TCT device profile for the

Re: [cisco-voip] Need help with call failure

Is this a new implementation or an in-flight system that recently developed this issue? A couple of things here: 4xx messages are client related messages while 5xx are server related. Your debug only shows evidence of a 403 (forbidden). I would verify that the user agent credentials are in-fac

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone

icemail service profile. From: Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:13 AM To: Ryan Huff; naresh rathore Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber voicemail issue only on IPhone Huh, maybe I'm not recalling correctly, but I can&

Re: [cisco-voip] 8845's cannot make outbound calls

conf t (config)# voice-port0/0/0:23 (config-voiceport)# bearer-cap speech exit wr mem Sent from my iPhone On Mar 31, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Nick Britt mailto:nickolasjbr...@gmail.com>> wrote: Just ran into this one Topology: 8845 > CUCM 8.6 > H323 GW > T1 > PSTN Desc of problem: Video c

Re: [cisco-voip] 8845's cannot make outbound calls

video on the handset in case you actually did want to use video for onnet calls or through trunks but do support video payloads. Thanks, Ryan On Mar 31, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: conf t (config)# voice-port0/0/0:23 (config-voiceport)# bearer-cap s

[cisco-voip] FN for ASA/FTD

I realize ASA/Firepower doesn't have much to do with voice organically, however, it does often participate with voice traffic flows so it worth making sure the list sees the field notice for ASA 9.x FTD 6.x. Basically, devices running the impacted versions of code may (read that as "it probably

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Push Notifications for iPhone and iPad

Anthony, I think it is. When you log into the Spark admin portal it calls itself "Cloud Collaboration Management Interface". I also think it is being used as a fluid moniker to describe all the things that are being added and changed (like how the WebEx and Spark backends are converging). Than

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Push Notifications for iPhone and iPad

wise, you'll need your own web proxy. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Anthony, I think it is. When you log into the Spark admin portal it calls itself "Cloud Collaboration Management Interface". I also think it is being used as

Re: [cisco-voip] BAT Phone Insert Issue

Yeah, the column headers for the CSVs change often between versions; required fields added, fields removed or renamed ... etc. My suggestion is to generate a "sample" export of the data set you're trying to import, using the 10.5.2 BAT. Then, copy/paste the relevant columns from your CSV that y

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

Not knowing how or where you acquired your original demo licenses (or if you were just running on the initial 60 day grace period); you could visit https://cisco.com/go/license and select "Demo and evaluation" from the "Get Other Licenses" selector for "Unified Communications Products". It shou

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

Hi Ahmed, You're on the right track, you can sync multiple forests/directories but you can only bind against one schema. Might be time to look outside of AD for authentication (SSO). Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman mailto:ahmed.rah...@bmbgr

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration question

d EL-Rahman Senior Network Engineer From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:32 PM To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman mailto:ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP i

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating IP space

Ben, The "Prepare Cluster for Rollback to Pre 8.0" parameter in part, is used to empty out the ITL and CTL files on each phone (the process to do that involves more than just setting that parameter though). As I recall, you enable the parameter, bounce TVS on each server to clear out all entri

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 12.0(x) does not support some deprecated phone models - Cisco

My guess is because of SLED and GOV. The 40s and 60s were nearly indestructible tanks with many still running. Cisco maybe giving them a longer shelf life to make the CapEx burden for new handsets easier to spread by slowly transitioning those models. I wouldn't count on them being around forev

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 12.0(x) does not support some deprecated phone models - Cisco

.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: Stephen Welsh [mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 12:36 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: Ryan Huff; Brian Meade; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]

Re: [cisco-voip] Field Notice: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 12.0(x) does not support some deprecated phone models - Cisco

uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: Stephen Welsh [mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 12:36 PM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: Ryan Huf

Re: [cisco-voip] can make conference call when i use IP communicator (same settings as 7942), but the conference call is not working when i use 7942 phone

Couple of questions ... Do both devices have access to the same MRGL/MRG in CUCM? Does the 7942's audio codec region match the region of where the disconnected party comes from (ex. PSTN gateway) or does it need transcoded? -Ryan On May 3, 2017, at 8:04 PM, naresh rathore mailto:nare...@hotm

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX and NTP

Hey Ben, This has less to do with UCCX and more to do with the lack of time precision in Windows SNTP / NTP compared to the needs of UCOS. Yes, I know, die hard Redmond boys and girls will say that ever since Win2003 that isn't the case but sorry, it is. (read: https://technet.microsoft.com/e

Re: [cisco-voip] CCX and NTP

ddresses. Because of that, I've been sticking with .gov based NTP on the voice gateway. Ryan Huff, one thing about pointing to strata 1 servers, most of them have restrictions from what I've seen, while they work, they could block you for not being approved if you send too many re

Re: [cisco-voip] License File

I would agree, re-hosting is invaluable. When we were making the transition to CUWL back in the 9.x days ... GLO was painfully swamped. Would have been great then ... I have had much better GLO reaction lately, but still, a self-service portal for re-host is boss. Now only to make a Spark bot f

[cisco-voip] Jabber Screen share over MRA

The native screen capture in the Jabber client does not work and is not supported over MRA (internal or WebEx Messenger IM Jabber works fine). I believe it is actually covered by the same Expressway caveat that states native P2P file sharing won't work over MRA. By using MFT (Managed File Trans

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

T1 PRI commands are substantially different if that is in play. Sent from my iPhone On May 12, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Matthew Loraditch mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>> wrote: The vast majority of commands are the same. Netflow stuff is changed completely if you use that. Outside of upd

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Screen share over MRA

e same kind of data since it’s an in-stream picture with text. Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 9:56 AM To: Anthony Holloway mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

P's you will need to decided if you will need them on the motherboard or on the T1 NIM. On the motherboard I believe it can only be used for conferencing. You will need them on the NIM for transcoding. On May 12, 2017 6:42 AM, "Ryan Huff" mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wr

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

if you will need them on the motherboard or on the T1 NIM. On the motherboard I believe it can only be used for conferencing. You will need them on the NIM for transcoding. On May 12, 2017 6:42 AM, "Ryan Huff" mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: T1 PRI commands are substantiall

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

tasks. Sent from my iPhone On May 12, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Jose Colon II mailto:jcolon...@gmail.com>> wrote: I was under the same assumption of why there was a dsp slot on the NIM. I know I read a Cisco doc somewhere that lead me that direction. On May 12, 2017 2:28 PM, "Ryan Hu

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

eCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>> wrote: What do mean by shareable to the backplane? It is my understanding that unused DSPs on a NIM can be used for conferencing/transcoding/MTP. Sent from my iPhone On May 12, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I think that is

Re: [cisco-voip] CISCO PHONES BAT Template.

Since you are coming from a dissimilar system, my advice is to create a phone template in CUCM (located in the phone subsection of the BAT menu of the publisher), per model, and put as much standardized data as you can in the phone template (device pool, CSS, sip profile, number of lines, CFNA/C

Re: [cisco-voip] SME or Leaf Subscriber Offline Timer

In what way are you classifying a "fail"? Once a subscriber node goes offline, replication to that node will stop/fail at the next replication attempt with that node (and be marked down even sooner than that). If database replication for the ENTIRE cluster has failed, it isn't because of a subs

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7942 phone Echoing.

Let me ask you this; when a user talks, are they hearing their own voice echoed back, OR is the far end (called party) hearing the talker's (calling party) voice twice in a way that sounds like an echo? Thanks, Ryan On May 15, 2017, at 9:00 PM, Hamu Ebiso mailto:hebiso2...@hotmail.com>> wrote

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7942 phone Echoing.

ation of the voice port paired with the interface for the voice card (Ex. voice-port 0/0/1:23) and reduce the input gain (Ex. input gain -3). Thanks, Ryan On May 15, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Let me ask you this; when a user talks, are they hearing

Re: [cisco-voip] Register MX300 G2 to CMR Cloud

Are you speaking about registering the endpoint to the Collaboration Cloud (Spark), or being able to use the endpoint with CMR Cloud? CMR Cloud is really nothing more than a specialize URI string (meeting.compa...@webex.com) in a b2b call through expressway (which by the way,

Re: [cisco-voip] Register MX300 G2 to CMR Cloud

Either way, you will need some sort of SIP registrar/proxy whether that is CUCM, Expressway or Collaboration Cloud (Spark) as the Codec's firmware alone does not provide that functionality. Sent from my iPhone On May 31, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>

Re: [cisco-voip] Register MX300 G2 to CMR Cloud

Also, to correct an earlier typo (my iPhone keyboard is for real this morning); a CMR URI would look like "webexmeetingnum...@company.webex.com<mailto:webexmeetingnum...@company.webex.com>". Sent from my iPhone On May 31, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@out

Re: [cisco-voip] GLC-TE modules

Mike, Do you have a link for the GLC-T eos, can't find it for some reason .. #GoogleFuFail Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 1, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Mike King wrote: > > Just wanted to throw an FYI out there for people. I just ran into this, and > it's a mess. > > Short Answer. > Cisco has EOS'd t

Re: [cisco-voip] GLC-TE modules

Never mind Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 1, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Mike King wrote: > > Just wanted to throw an FYI out there for people. I just ran into this, and > it's a mess. > > Short Answer. > Cisco has EOS'd the GLC-T modules (today), and replaced it with the GLC-TE > (They increased

Re: [cisco-voip] Hide Number Translation on Screen

The phone display is always going to show whatever digits are being sent to the called party/device (whether those are natively dialed or transformed digits). Thanks, Ryan Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 21, 2017, at 12:23 PM, David Zhars wrote: > > Is there a way to not show the number transla

Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

I suspect that would just obliterate CTL every time certbot runs the renewal ... every 3 months all phones reject registration... fun stuff. I suspect there would have to be a fundamental change with TVS and the SBD architecture. -Ryan On Jun 23, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) mai

Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

have to have some sort of manual intervention. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) mailto:rratl...@cisco.com>> wrote: The signing of the CTL and ITL is easy to fix. The bigger problem is the automatic phone reset. -Ryan On Jun 23, 2017, at 12:58 PM

Re: [cisco-voip] expressway c/e

Pick the guides relevant to your version from here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/expressway-series/products-installation-and-configuration-guides-list.html Sent from my iPhone On Jun 23, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Arun Kumar mailto:arunraodhu...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, can

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

Are you dealing with a standalone PLM? If it's co-res, you'd just backup the PLM feature in the normal CUCM DRS. For standalone, you should be able to use all the normal CLI DRS utilities (or activate the CUCM application for the purpose of accessing DRS). Thanks, Ryan On Jun 27, 2017, at 10:

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

ably more concerning than > if it is just providing licensing. Since we don't often issue new licenses > out into our system the "restore" would just be missing that usage data but > would be fine to restore licensing should we have to rebuild this machine. > (Standalone

Re: [cisco-voip] um, where'd the scheduled backups go in PLM

t, Network Infrastructure > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > University of Guelph > > 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 > le...@uoguelph.ca > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > > -Original Mess

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.5 TO CUCM 11 Migration

Asim, What type of software do your call center agents use; UCCX, Attendant Console, or just using specialized treatment within CUCM 7.5? Thanks, Ryan On Jul 9, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Asim Mekki Basheer mailto:asim_...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hello we have CUCM 7.5 and this cucm served both Cor

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.5 TO CUCM 11 Migration

w emails. Thanks, Ryan On Jul 9, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Asim Mekki Basheer mailto:asim_...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hello Ryan we are using UCCE but CUCM 7.5 will not touch we will only migrate corporate ext form cucm 7 to cucm 11 Thanks ASIM ____ From: Ryan H

Re: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting to 4510/4748

it show up CDP? Thanks, Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Hendrix, Bill W. - US Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:14 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting to 4510/4748 Hey guys, I am testing an 8841 on a switch

Re: [cisco-voip] 8841 no power connecting to 4510/4748

Bill, Verify that CDP and power inline auto are enabled from the port configuration perspective then from the enable prompt, what is the available/used wattage output of "show power inline"? Thanks, Ryan From: cisco-voip on behalf of Ryan H

Re: [cisco-voip] Clearing DNS cache on Unity 10.5

Sometimes bouncing tomcat services on all nodes will help. I'd try that first, "Utils service restart Cisco Tomcat" -Ryan On Jul 10, 2017, at 6:51 PM, "norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca" mailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca>> wrote: Is there a command in CLI to do

Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

Not sure what you're referring to by "sit"? Are you referring to a hardware burn-in of the host chassis the guest VM is running on? During the non-production period, is the business using it to validate its configuration and usability for its specified business case? Usually, once UAT (User Acc

Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

e how long do I let other Cisco customers find any serious issues before I would hop on. Wait for the "a" revision to drop. was typical back in the day. not sure if expressway had the same history. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Not

Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

trition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 3:28 PM To: Tim Frazee Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Custom Call Variables - Script to Script Transfers

I assume you are looking for a solution solely within the confines of ccx/cuic, without invoking the assistant of CUCM? Sent from my iPhone On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Anthony Holloway mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote: I'm working on a menu selection tracking solution, which sur

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Custom Call Variables - Script to Script Transfers

Holloway mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes, but I'll hear what you have to say nonetheless. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:23 PM Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: I assume you are looking for a solution solely within the confines of ccx/cuic, without invok

Re: [cisco-voip] Informacast SNMP error with UCM

Just throwing this out as something to try before a cluster reboot "utils diagnose test" see if the ntp or reverse DNS test modules hiccup. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> wrote: From Syslog, we can see lot of "DBLException" wit

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP to Multicast Device

Brian, Check out their 8301 paging adapter: http://www.algosolutions.com/products/audible-and-visual-alerting.html Sent from my iPhone On Jul 20, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Brian Meade mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote: Anyone know of a device that will register with CUCM via SIP or support a SIP trunk

Re: [cisco-voip] Force an outgoing call through a subscriber

So the actual media (RTP) will never flow through a CUCM server; it may however, terminate a connected media stream on a software based MTP application that CUCM runs as a service (IP Voice Media Streaming Application). Signaling (SIP) on the other hand, will always traverse a CUCM server. If y

Re: [cisco-voip] Force an outgoing call through a subscriber

things Ryan: 1) Your first sentence reads to me like a contradiction. Could you clarify what you're stating here? 2) Media can flow through, and even terminate on CUCM, since things like Conference Bridges, MTPs and now the new IVR media resource, are all doing that. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Licensing - UCL / CUWL

Once loaded into the PLM/ELM, legitimately purchased licenses will be marked permanent (shown in the licensing inventory section). If Cisco licensing (GLO) has issued you "demo" or "temp" licenses; they will generally expire 60 days after being loaded into the PLM/ELM. -Ryan > On Aug 6, 2017,

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Licensing - UCL / CUWL

hanks, Ryan > On Aug 6, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Jon Fox wrote: > > Thanks Ryan, > That is what i suspected. Once purchased and uploaded they will not expire? > They don’t have a life span? > > Jon >> On 6 Aug 2017, at 21:35, Ryan Huff wrote: >> >> Once loaded into

Re: [cisco-voip] what triggers license change in UCCx?

Biggest issue with the UCCX rehost most folks have is not expecting it and then winding up with a degraded call center until the rehost is complete. The Answer File Generator (https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/applicat/content/cuc-afg/index.html) is a good way to help predict the LMAC, so you can g

Re: [cisco-voip] 11.5.1SU2 Can't Add Node

I just hit this issue tonight myself (11.5(SU1)); my case doesn't seem to fit CSCvb00248 as I am using 9 character passwords; I'm not using any special characters either. I've tried all the normal reboots, delete / re-added from the processNode table ... etc, NTP and DNS are solid. I opened a TA

Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound Video Calls to Webex fail with 481

Do you have EXP clusters or is this a single C/E pair? Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote: > > We have an SX80 connected to CUCM 11.5 and VCSC 8.10 to a VCSE 8.10... > > Outbound calls route to Webex, you see them enter the meeting and then after > 4 se

Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound Video Calls to Webex fail with 481

:27 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: Do you have EXP clusters or is this a single C/E pair? Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Jonathan Charles > mailto:jonv...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > We have an SX80 connected to CUCM 11.5 and VCSC 8.10

Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound Video Calls to Webex fail with 481

. Thanks, Ryan On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote: This might have to do with DNS. I would review all your internal/external SRV/A records for EXP/CUCM and your DNS zone in EXP. It sounds like the call is traversing expressway, but call manager

Re: [cisco-voip] 11.5.1SU2 Can't Add Node

are blind-folded from the network, it can be like trying to herd a litter of feral cats. -Ryan From: Matthew Loraditch Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 7:52 AM To: Anthony Holloway; Dana Tong; Ryan Huff; Dave Goodwin; Brian Meade Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

1.) Bug Poll Legitimate bugs (which I define as unexpected behavior in consistent with published Cisco documentation): 2% Customer Issue: 98% 2.) I usually devote 16-20 hours of planning and prepping the upgrade (Documentation, Visio, building the bridge if it's that kind of upgra

Re: [cisco-voip] UCM Upgrade Poll

I would tend to agree that the overall installation process could improve (not that I want to give up my ANSI art or anything). Most of the installation process today is merely an extension of the underlying Linux kernel. I would settle for more verbose feedback when errors are encountered, like

Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound CLI displaying on CUAC console.

Does this inbound caller ID behavior also happen on a normal inbound call to an IP phone, that then forwards the call to another destination internally? Since you rebuilt CCM with BAT, did you change the PSTN ingress protocol (Ex. It WAS an MGCP gateway and now it IS an h.323 gateway)? If the c

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IM & Presence 11 5.1 SU2 corrupt install with 2nd server

The Unified Communications IM and Presence ISO is bootable I believe (maybe that changed?); although it's sister ISO, Unified Communications Manager is not. From: cisco-voip on behalf of Anthony Holloway Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:08 AM To: Matthew Huff;

Re: [cisco-voip] Outbound Video Calls to Webex fail with 481

verify/port 5061 required. That's my guess anyway, -RH From: bmead...@gmail.com on behalf of Brian Meade Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 4:37 PM To: Anthony Holloway Cc: Jonathan Charles; Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Out

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco IM & Presence 11 5.1 SU2 corrupt install with 2nd server

pulled them due to issues with another department. Here is the relevant thread: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/2010-August/015533.html Have to read some of the quoted messages that were not posted to the list. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Ryan Huff mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>&

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP option ping prioritization

The OPTIONS Ping will come across in the regular SIP stack (TCP:5060/TCP:5061 or UDP:5060 typically). Prioritization is a Quality of Service technique and not an Access Control technique. I don't think a standard ACL would look at the application layer header to differentiate SIP messages and of

Re: [cisco-voip] using resource pools to organize VMs - supported?

As I understand the TRC, as long as the compute/storage needs are available 100% of the time (no oversubscription) and the storage wasn't dynamically created (thin provision); then I believe you are okay to organize as you see fit. I think you can thin provision, as long as the total storage al

Re: [cisco-voip] Office 365 CUC 11.5.1 and Speechview

Unity Connection v11.5.1 should work with O365 for Unified Messaging. What type of error are you encountering? -RH On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Sean E. Knight via cisco-voip mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>> wrote: We had Unified Messaging and Exchange 2010 and worked fine and then we are m

Re: [cisco-voip] Naming conventions for Expressway-C / E

I usually keep the names, "edge" and "control" incorporated in them somehow. If I'm trying to save on typing and it's a single pair I might do, "expcontrol" and "expedge". With clusters, I'll add more to the name that denote its purpose or location. Thanks, Ryan On Sep 4, 2017, at 6:17 AM, Ma

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >