Folks:
I'm reviewing an issue and looking for some feedback on a specific SIP stack
error. In a nutshell, what appears to be happening is CUCM (8.6.2.24090-1)
responding to an UPDATE request with a 500 Internal Server Error in a very
specific transfer call flow:
.::: Call is established :::
/Last Offer not answered yet
== Note: Context ID (ccb=id) matches the ID created at the start of the
dialogue
500 Internal SvrErr --
Thoughts? Thanks again Brian.
- Daniel
From: Brian Meade (brmeade) [mailto:brme...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:59 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
I've worked an issue very similar to this on a UCS C series server. Some
background... the UCS server hosted two CUCM nodes and a CUC subscriber. The
issue was first reported as conference audio sounding garbled.
Troubleshooting the issue for a few minutes revealed that we could recreate the
I’ll see what I can contribute here as sort of an “outsider” as Fidelus is not
part of Akkadian software support. Being sister companies, communicating with
the Akkadian support group and developers is easily achieved, and as a member
of the Fidelus UC managed services team I certainly hope to
in the
future.
- Daniel
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:35 AM
To: Casper, Steven; 'Erick'
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fidelus Attendant Console to Call Manager Issue
I’ll see
You can use the following tool to view IP phone compatibility with a selected
version of CUCM:
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet
The required firmware is listed beside each supported phone model.
Hope this helps.
- Daniel
From: cisco-voip
Jorge:
From what I understand and have read, the telephoneNumber=* should
automatically filter NULL fields.
I cannot get your filter to work properly in my lab:
((objectclass=user)(!(objectclass=Computer))(objectclass=contact)(telephoneNumber=*))
Looking at the syntax of this filter, it seems
Folks:
I have a quick questions with regards to LBM traces and operations.
LBM traces print the location-to-location relationship in a bi-directional
format. For example, when the requested reservation is added in LBM for a call
using a single location link:
On one line I'll see...
RES_REC
, Brian.
- Daniel
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:16 PM
To: Brian Meade (brmeade); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Stack Trace Question
Brian:
Thanks for the response.
I'd have
Your recommendation for the customer to set privacy from ID to None should
resolve this issue. CUBE is receiving the Privacy: ID header and option, then
withholding the asserted ID when sending it to an untrusted destination. Check
out RFC 3325:
http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc3325.pdf
The
Just for clarification, this defect is unrelated to the issue that was
described below. The defect you're referring to is related to RouteListCdrc
detecting the destination gateway/trunk as down when in actuality it is up and
available. Hefin swapped the patch cables between two T1s and the
Folks:
I'm hoping someone can tell me the purpose of the SDL event CtiCallParkNotify
sent from CallPark to CTIHandler. During a call park event from a JTAPI client,
I'm seeing the standard SDL event CtiLineCallParkReq from CTIDeviceLineMgr to
StationD and the proper response CtiLineCallParkRes
On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Daniel Pagan
dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
Wes
Thanks for the response - I figured the third section described some type of
state but didn't know it was for the destination process. That's really helpful.
As for the issue at hand...
I'm
] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:15 PM
To: Wes Sisk (wsisk)
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CTI CCM SDL Trace Question
Excellent - I'll check out CTI Manager traces covering the registration of the
JTAPI client. I'm guessing I'll see new instances
could not be found error.
- Daniel
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:07 PM
To: Matt Taber (mtaber); Matt Slaga (AM)
Cc: 'Cisco-Voip-Puck' (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCM 9.1 SIP
is on 9.1(2) SU1 so perhaps it's still unavailable.
Thanks for the assistance earlier.
- Daniel
From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) [mailto:ws...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:04 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CTI CCM SDL Trace Question
invalid parkDN
Folks:
CUCM ES 8.6.2.24122-1 appears to be creating an issue where CallManager
heartbeat fails to increment upon startup and the condition that must be met is
very specific. On a problematic node, SDL traces show the following error
exactly one hour after the start of the CCM service:
8.6.2.24122-1.
- Daniel
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:35 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Heartbeat Failure SNRD
Folks:
CUCM ES 8.6.2.24122-1 appears to be creating an issue where CallManager
heartbeat fails to increment upon startup and the condition that must
Just a quick wrap-up on this one...
Two defects created for this problem are CSCup27726 and CSCup27133.
- Dan
From: Wes Sisk (wsisk) [mailto:ws...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 2:50 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Heartbeat Failure SNRD
Folks:
Hoping someone can give me a bit of information on UnityCx's MWI throttle
mechanism. Does the MWI throttle mechanism limit the number of ports that can
be reserved simultaneously for MWI events? Unfortunately an online search only
brings a known defect that references the MWI throttle
of simultaneous ports
allocated for MWI functionality and, if so, how that throttling mechanism is
designed.
Thanks
- Daniel
From: Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:01 PM
To: Daniel Pagan; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: UnityCx
there for the entire duration of the resync task. I’m
wondering if the MWI throttle mechanism referenced in a few articles is
responsible for this limiting of port allocation I’m seeing. There doesn’t seem
to be any parameters that handle this.
Thanks
- Dan
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12
Folks:
Quick question on the preCheckCapabilities step for MediaManager. After a new
MediaManager is created, I've often referred to the preCheckCapabilities line
for determining codec and DTMF relay capabilities based on codec type numbers
(Cap,ptime) and figured that ptime was simply the
...@cisco.com
wrote:
I believe ptime is the number of frames per packet.
-Ryan
On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
Folks:
Quick question on the preCheckCapabilities step for MediaManager.
After a new MediaManager is created, I've often referred
7705.006 |10:00:33.619 |AppInfo |Digit analysis: match(pi=1,fqcn=1004,
cn=1004, plv=5, pss=, TodFilteredPss=, dd=1001,dac=0)
7705.007 |10:00:33.619 |AppInfo |Digit analysis:
potentialMatches=NoPotentialMatchesExist
Is x1001 assigned to a partition?
PSS= is your partition search
Folks:
Wondering if anyone else has observed an issue where a CUCM node fails to send
a SIP session refresh while an upgrade is in progress? I noticed this behavior
when running through a mock upgrade for a customer. While upgrading the
Publisher node, a call was active where the SIP dialog
Ed:
As a test, are you able to recreate the issue when PSTN leg doesn’t answer for
12 seconds after the transfer attempt? I ask because, based on the timestamps
below, it seems the media exchange timer might be expiring. If you still have
SDL traces, you can search for “MXTimeout”. If you find
an OpenReceiveChannel signal, resulting in
a MX timeout. Doubt it’s related to this problem though… my issue was related
to CTI ports.
- Dan
From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: Sreekanth Narayanan; Mike Nickolich; Cisco VOIP
Subject
Folks:
I'm hoping someone can share their experience with the Cisco recommended method
for removing EWS limits on Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4 and higher. In earlier
releases of Ex2010 the process of setting a throttling policy applied only to
the UM service account, and any throttling performed
[mailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] EWS Limits Throttling Policy
I've successfully used the 'paged view functionality' on the later versions of
Connections that works around this issue
: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 11:48 AM
To: Justin Steinberg
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] EWS Limits Throttling Policy
Thanks – I noticed this as well and the preceding statement under
This isn’t bulk export, but Message Archiver allows you to export voice
messages for a Unity Connection user/subscriber to a compressed file.
Tool:
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/MessageArchiver/MessageArchiver.html
Tool Help:
Few questions I would try to answer here:
Is CUCM negotiating Early Media successfully on these problem calls?
Do I see a StationD event for AlertingTone to the IP Phone?
CUCM should instruct the SCCP phone to play local ring back via AlertingTone
event when early media cannot be negotiated.
Adding to Wes's comments for managing consumed disk space on an archive
server... For a Windows OS server, the forfiles command with a few options can
help with the disk space cleanup as well:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/51054/batch-file-to-delete-files-older-than-n-days
But to the
If you absolutely can't have any log files older than seven days on disk, one
option would be to configure and schedule trace archiving for all services and
applications, but make sure the delete log files from the server option is
enabled.
This would provide you with two things:
1.
Funny it certainly is. Reminds me of a quirky issue we found a while back. Had
a customer who opened a case saying his phone was a vampire. The customer said
his phone calls were being disconnected by sunlight. His phone was positioned
on a desk where direct sunlight would hit the phone at
To: Daniel Pagan; Jason Aarons (AM); Jeffrey Girard; Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7945 more button does nothing under ITL (can't delete
the ITL)
So the sunlight only happens with CUCM 8.5(2).
Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide
Folks:
Hoping to get some insight on SDL process creation for H245...
Scenario is three CUCM clusters communicating over ICTs. Call is routed from
Cluster-1 to Cluster-2... then Cluster-2 to Cluster-3. Cluster-3 sends the H245
address port info via H225 ALERTING to Cluster-2, which then sends
Thanks Ryan - that's what I was hoping to hear. I'll try to set this up in a
lab to confirm with some simple ACLs.
- Dan
From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) [mailto:rratl...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 5:33 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip
] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 5:51 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Cc: Daniel Pagan; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] H245Interface Related Processes
Also should be fairly easy to capture via a packet capture on Cluster 1 if this
is easily reproducible
After re-reading my email, perhaps my words were a bit harsh on that section of
the SRND :) but I do think the timer statement might need to be revisited and
possibly rewritten.
Good weekend to all!
- Dan
On Feb 6, 2015, at 5:38 PM, Daniel Pagan
dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com
://andrewjprokop.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/understanding-sip-timers-part-i/
Hope this helps.
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 2:33 PM
To: gen...@ucpenguin.com; cisco-voip
The DNS assignments make up part of the hash used to generate the license MAC
address in UCM 8.x. If you need to update the DNS entries, my recommendation
would be to simply:
1. Document the current license MAC address. Would also be helpful to to
have your Cisco TAC support contract
Quick correction - I should have said the primary DNS server assignment and
not simply DNS assignments, which after reading my message a 2nd time might
imply that any DNS entry change would regenerate a new license MAC.
Hope this helps.
- Dan
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015
or set the voicemail policy to Timer Control.
- Dan
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:53 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: ParkingLotD and SNR | Leaked Calls on StationD
Folks:
Hoping someone can tell me if and how ParkingLotD and ParkingLotCdpc are
related
If we're talking about transport level timeout, it looks like the command is
available in CUBE SP Edition:
In addition to the SIP protocol-level timers, Cisco Unified Border Element (SP
Edition) also allows modification of transport-related timer commands:
tcp-connect-timeout (how long TCP SYN
For clarity, by “higher bandwidth codec” I meant to say higher bit-rate codec,
or codec of higher bandwidth consumption.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:08 PM
To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Hey Ryan how’s it going? Transcoder allocated by CUCM comes from the side using
a higher bandwidth codec, regardless if it’s the calling or called party, with
the intention to avoid streaming a high bandwidth consuming codec over a WAN
connection – keeping it local to the LAN. Of course, this
The main question I have... if CUC is being used simply to hang-up on the
calling party, what's the purpose of needing this migrated to CUCM instead of
simply leaving the number unallocated? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to
me that you're specifically looking for a method in CUCM where
...@ccgs.wa.edu.au]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:38 AM
To: Daniel Pagan; Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?
Hi Dan,
This is to transfer to from an Exchange UM AA where we want to hang up on the
caller after playing a message (it's summer
Ahmed -
Not sure if I completely follow but are you concerned about the order of
operations for digit manipulation in IOS? If you are then I would say your
expectation would be correct with digit manipulation in IOS occurring in the
following steps and in the following order:
incoming
Agreed – To add to Brian’s message, the only benefit to having this powered
down standby IMO would be minimizing time to restore should the Publisher ever
need to be rebuilt in a DR situation. If you had a VM sharing the same IP
address/hostname/cert information as the existing Publisher and
never receives a 200 Final Response, nor is there a 183 w/ SDP for early media,
I would imagine because we never reached the alerting state in CUCM.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: gen...@ucpenguin.com [mailto:gen...@ucpenguin.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:18 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc
But this doesn’t provide the logic required for the call acceptance rule of
“accept only the first (regardless of ToD), reject all others, reset after 24
hours”. Aside from using some form of UCCX scripting or using a custom app
integrated through the JTAPI or Routing Rules API, I too don’t see
Adding to Dennis's question below, is CUCM v11 going to be discussed at Cisco
Live in June? I see no sessions or breakouts about this. There's a few sessions
on CUC and UCCX roadmaps but nothing similar with regards to UCM.
Thanks!
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip
...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:08 PM
To: Daniel Pagan; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage
Shutdown, yes. Running, no.
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
From: Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com
Sent
, which is definitely Cisco supported.
Some confusion on my part between the two migration methods but all is clear.
Thanks!
- Dan
From: Dave Goodwin [mailto:dave.good...@december.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 8:47 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re
continue
In CUCM... DN 56789 - CFwdAll to Voicemail - Unity CH or User w/ mailbox
Add the partition of 56789 to the CSS of the UCCX CTI ports performing the
redirect.
- Dan
From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 12:23 PM
To: Daniel Pagan; norm.nichol
user based on
first redirecting number, which might use the CTI port performing the
redirect... Not sure... would need to test... but it's probably the cleanest
solution IMO.
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:11 PM
To: 'Ryan Huff'; norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip
For routing based on ANI, Ryan Huff's suggestion will certainly help from the
perspective of CUCM. You can use this alongside CUC routing rules - route calls
from the 519 area code to a specific mailbox. If you know these callers from
area code 519 are dialing the same DNIS, then routing by ANI
Quick question...
vMotion of a shut down UCM between two hosts without shared storage using
vCenter. Is this supported? The virtualization document for UC platforms says
vMotion is supported on shared storage, so I figured to ask. Is this migration
method supported?
- Dan
:01 AM
To: Daniel Pagan; Dave Goodwin
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage
Daniel,
Could you give a little more detail about your experience with this process?
The confusion you faced is likely the same confusion many of us would face.
Which document
I’d also say a similar defect would be CSCul71689 – a defect I came across
quite often on 8.6(2). Like Brian said, hunt lists use RouteListControl which
creates HuntListCdrc for call distribution to your line group members. With
either defect, I’d say another possible workaround would be to
and Cc signals
Some more detail on this issue in my previous messages.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:10 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ParkingLotD and SNR | Leaked Calls
But to answer your specific question, I haven't seen this issue being directly
related to a 10.5 upgrade.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:43 AM
To: Adam Frankel (afrankel); Lisa Notarianni; cisco-voip
Jonathan:
I’ll zip and email a copy to you directly. What I don’t have however is
documentation on the tool. I was given a wiki URL that doesn’t work.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Charles
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:07 PM
To:
Just to add to Anthony’s email, I suggest making sure to add to the vCPU socket
count, not number of vCPU cores per socket. Also note that you can increase
your vCPU socket count but should *not* decrease it – this is not supported.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip
Adding to Neal’s comments, you might find the following documentation helpful:
Cisco Live: Best Practices for Migrating to CUCM 10.5
https://clnv.s3.amazonaws.com/2014%2Fusa%2Fpdf%2FBRKUCC-2011.pdf?Expires=1427481707AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJO3XQSJMRXKWDHZQSignature=ZqJonKRBn4Tlw9mXHoxg7d9RUUY%3D
The
Hmmm… Subject line says “from 8.5” but message body says “from 8.6”. Perhaps
he’s referring to 8.5?
If you are then keep in mind the upgrade will require not only the
version3-keys.cop file, but you’ll need to install the refresh_upgrade file as
well. See the ReadMe:
, 2015, at 10:18 PM, Daniel Pagan
dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
I’d also say a similar defect would be CSCul71689 – a defect I came across
quite often on 8.6(2). Like Brian said, hunt lists use RouteListControl which
creates HuntListCdrc for call distribution to your line group
Don't think it does but rather the other way around. In this scenario, the
called phone pressing park is going to need CSS access to a call park range
sitting on the node where the gateway is registered, but I don't think the
gateway CSS gets used to allocate that park DN. That's assuming
Do you see a StartMediaTransmission being sent to your MOH server? Look for
MohDControl for SCCP signals to the MOH server - one process instance is
created per MOH server. But first, before sending the StartMediaTransmission
signal to MohDControl, CCM will first attempt to get media
/local/cm/moh/ringback.ulaw.wav)
Of course CUCM won’t get to this point if the issue resides at the signaling
protocol and media setup aspect of the call. Regardless, hope this helps.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Friday, May 15
I’m digging up an old thread here (perhaps because of tender pain points) but
the point you made about multi-site is spot on, Dennis… especially if the
remote location’s connectivity to the PCD’s site is less than ideal. In this
type of scenario, one can encounter issues with PCD where a
that with a
WinSCP session into PCD (browse through /export sub directories…) and a person
can really get more detailed information than what’s offered in documentation.
- Dan
From: Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 11:49 AM
To: Daniel Pagan; Heim
Adding to Ryan’s suggestion re: ACKs - I took a snip of some internal
documentation I wrote re: MGCP debugs that might help. The MGCP transaction ID,
in a CCM SDL trace or MGCP packet debug output, would look similar to this:
http://i.imgur.com/O1YGnUO.png. Just showing the transaction ID
I'm also attending.
Anthony: Nice! I'll be sure to do my best to stop by and check it out.
Stephen: Looking forward to checking out the applications on demo.
- Dan
Sent from my mobile device.
On Jun 8, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Anthony Holloway
I know it's not an exact match but it's very similar to a dialing forest dump
procedure off a SCCP handset:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/97751/how-dump-ccm-memoryimdb-diagnostic-information-traces
I personally haven't used the **##**32 you mentioned though.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip
LDAP authentication is used by Tomcat and isn’t just restricted to the
Publisher server - Subscriber nodes handle this as well. DirSync is specific to
synchronization of LDAP attributes and only runs on the Pub, so synchronization
would definitely be affected if the Publisher is offline. I
to
7.x as far as I recall.
Hope this helps
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 9:45 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Authentication when CUCM publisher is down
I personally can't speak to 3rd party FXS gateways, but I've worked with
customers in the past whose VG224s were integrated w/ CUCM via SIP trunk. The
two caveats that immediately come to mind are applicable to a non-Cisco FXS
gateway using SIP as well:
1) Lack of SCCP supplementary
voip
fax-relay ecm disable
For MGCP
no mgcp fax t38 ecm
Hope this helps.
- Dan
From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:53 AM
To: nh...@co.fresno.ca.us; Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com;
norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject
.
Hope this helps.
- Dan
On Aug 18, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
there’s no way to inject the CNG tone
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
that you won't get the same
results using any type of fax relay since PCM audio isn't being transmitted,
but the flow remains the same.
Hope this helps.
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: NateCCIE [mailto:natec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 6:45 PM
To: Daniel Pagan dpa
That “pre-tone” you’re referring to is called the CNG tone, assuming you hear
it every 3 seconds on your calling fax machine. It’s basically what tells the
remote end “I’m a fax machine” but many devices no long wait to hear this
before attempting to start negotiating capabilities. However, it
Most if not all of the system default prompts are stored in the local
filesystem and can’t be accessed without root permission. These prompts (two
different files play to form that message) are two of those /PHGreet/ .wav
files and cannot be changed. Unfortunately I’m unware of any method for
On occasion I’ll also review the Tomcat logs for identifying who accessed a
specific portion of CCMAdmin, then use that information to begin digging deeper
in other trace files. You can try collecting Tomcat logs off all nodes (because
we don’t know which node was accessed via HTTP), and search
In 8.6 and 9.x it’s five. Limit of sync agreements was increased to 20 in CUCM
10.5.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Techguy
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:27 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Ldap
Is there a cap on the
Use the timestamp from audit logs and review CCM SDI detailed traces. If set to
detailed, there should be an entry for the DB change notification mentioning
what was changed. It'll either give you a before after PKID or a before
after numerical value depending on what was modified.
- Dan
Is your Nortel PBX sending a FQDN in the Contact header? This is important
because in 10.5(2) CUCM performs a SRV and A Record lookup on FQDNs contained
in a SIP Contact header. If this lookup fails, then expect to see a CANCEL
followed by a BYE. I encountered this a few times over the past few
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:49 AM
To: Daniel Pagan; voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Nortel 81C / CS1000 SIP Trunk to CUCM 10.5.2
Hi Dan,
Last night I migrated to 10.5.2.SU2 and then this morning applied the
ciscocm.FQDNwithDNS-v1.0.k3.cop.sgn patch.
On both CUCM and CS1000 we are using
straight IP address and not a FQDN for
comm.Since I did this patch's I am going to let things bake and see if the
error(s) returns.
I will keep my eyes on RTMT too see how things behave.
-Mike
Michael T. Voity
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(802) 656-8112
On 7/14/2015 9:29 AM, Daniel
If you’re certain the hold request is coming from IM, and the hold request is
in reference to the call reference (CI) associated with the call in question,
then my suggestion would be to open a TAC case. At this point, assuming this
finding is applicable to the problem at hand, and end-user
On the topic of NTP and upgrades/migrations, I would advise to also watch out
for CSCur94973.
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCur94973
- Dan
-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:20 AM
Sreekanth: Really enjoyed your LUA scripting video.
Ahmed: Adding to this, you can use the Call-ID header for identifying a
specific SIP call flow in the output of debug ccsip messages. The Call-ID
header field is a unique identifier for the SIP dialog, which means the Call-ID
header field for
Adding to list of possibilities, it could also be an unaccepted transport
type... E.g. CUCM now sending SIP requests via TCP when UDP inbound is
configured on Exchange.
Also if require MTP is configured but none are available, in which case I’d
check MRM in SDL traces.
But my guess would be
“If a device pool doesn't have anything setup for Standard Local Route Group,
when someone from that pool calls a route pattern referencing this Route List
will it just smoothly go to option #2 or is there some gotcha i'm not grasping?”
Yes - CUCM attempts to get information on the SLRG once
No problem. The solution you used was described in option #2 of my email.
- Dan
end attach-
From: abbas Wali [mailto:abba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Daniel Pagan <dpa...@fidelus.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip]
The request-URI in this case is the PKID of the DN followed by the IP address
of the phone. Check it out:
https://10.10.13.100/ccmadmin/directoryNumberEdit.do?key=ae97ba4b-2397-4b52-5ddc-07589fb380ab
^^^URL of a test DN.
Key= ae97ba4b-2397-4b52-5ddc-07589fb380ab
INVITE
configuration file:
ae97ba4b-2397-4b52-5ddc-07589fb380ab
Hope this helps.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:44 AM
To: Mark Holloway <m...@markholloway.com>; voip puck
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
