Re: [cisco-voip] UCS 240 M3 pink screen

Ignite. From: 0703Manjunath [mailto:winmanjun...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 9:22 AM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: Tim Smith; cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCS 240 M3 pink screen Dennis It's UCS-RAID9271-8I . We have installed above new Riad h/w

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 125, Issue 5

line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade from v7 to v9? (Heim, Dennis) 2. Re: Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x (Pavan K) 3. Re: should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 125, Issue 5

Irshad [mailto:mohammed.irs...@outlook.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 10:25 AM To: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 125, Issue 5 Yes. I have Cisco 8945 Phones at HQ as well as at Branch Offices. Regards Irshad -Original Message

Re: [cisco-voip] BARS installation - CUCM 4.2(3) on VMWARE

Seems to be complaining about the bars password phrase that you entered. Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Shaihan Jaffrey

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrade from 8.0(x) to 9.X

Considering you have UC+UCCE, you will probably want to enlist the help of a Cisco partner that is certified for CUCM and UCCE. Lots of things can go wrong during upgrades. Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate

Re: [cisco-voip] easiest way to dump and search CallManager configuration for specific targets

3:13 PM To: Anthony Holloway Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] easiest way to dump and search CallManager configuration for specific targets Definitely. Very powerful. But for now, I'd like to stick with the default export results and begin a snapshot. It would

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10

.0 releases are only available through the PUT tool. Once .1 or .5 comes out that should be posted to CCO. Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] update IP Phone firmware

Remember if you install the COP file on your publisher, you will need to set the default load back to what it currently is, otherwise all phones will try to pull the new code upon reboot. Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS

Re: [cisco-voip] Certificates on CUCM and CUCM IM P

Have you populated the IP Address as a subject alternative name? Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel L. M. B. Perez Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] 8 channel GSM gateways?

I think this probably a little bigger than you are looking for, but interesting none the less, talks SIP/H.323. http://www.hyperms.com/products/gsm-gateways/voip-gsm-gateway.html Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering:

Re: [cisco-voip] Multistage Dialing FAC

mean to you? -Wes On May 2, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Heim, Dennis dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote: Is it possible with multistage dialing to enter in cucm forced authorization codes? Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7x with ACME SBC

My issue with LUA on CUCM is around support. Since LUA is not tac supported. What is the official support path? Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Callcentric Question

: Sunday, May 11, 2014 3:16 PM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Callcentric Question Hmmm. I have Callcentric on my 7960 not thru CME. I dial *123 for voicemail. Perhaps configure a softkey button to autodial that? Chris On May 11, 2014 12:04 PM, Heim

Re: [cisco-voip] Who's going to be at Live next week?

I will be there. Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Welsh Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 8:09 AM To: Matthew Loraditch Cc:

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 and UDS Enhancements ?

Has anyone seen release notes for 10.5 yet? Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (AM) Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014

[cisco-voip] Cisco Live

For those at live, anyone up for a get together tonight? Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814 PS Engineering: Innovate Ignite. ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Call Recording Solution

Mediasense is largely a platform that requires some frontend software to access the archived data. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf

Re: [cisco-voip] locations based CAC and video marking

When you start getting multiple real time applications going and/or ample number of clusters 3+, I usually say at that time its time to have the dreaded conversation... RSVP. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814

Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP Session Border Controllers

CUBE supports line side registrations Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01CF8572.4305C010]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] 9951 can't access EM Url??

Security by default I would normally say, but tis showing just http. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01CF8C84.ECE7A710]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] cucm 10.5(1) vs 10.0(1)

I'd go with 10.5. Traditionally once the first non dot zero release is RTM, the dot zero no longer sees development and Cisco generally steers you toward upgrading off the .0. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 -Original

[cisco-voip] MRA/Expressway

I am trying to configure MRA for the first time. We have split dns zones, so acme.loc (internal DNS) and acme.com (external DNS). We are struggling with determining what should be in the subject alternative names (SAN) for the Expressway-E certificate? Thanks, Dennis Heim | Collaboration

[cisco-voip] MWI Routing with SME

SME cluster is +E.164. Leaf clusters are 11-digit. Unity Connection is connected to the SME cluster, and mailboxes are +E.164. Routing between SME-Leaf's are E.164. Is it possible to have MWI messages have the + stripped when reaching the leaf clusters? Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions

[cisco-voip] MRA

Working through MRA. TLS is required which require a SAN certificate, I get that. However, the Expressway-E does not populate the chat nodes subject alternative names without the TLS link between CE coming up. What am I missing? Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide

[cisco-voip] Cisco-Acme T.38

We have the call flow like this; Fax Machine-VG202-CUCM-SIP Trunk-ACME-Verizon SIP Trunk-PSTN We are trying to get T.38 to work in this mess, but we keep getting G.711. Normally, I am used to have a CUBE router instead of going through a SIP trunk to CUCM. Thoughts? Dennis Heim |

[cisco-voip] SIP gateway Caller id

PRI-2901-SIP-CUCM We see the clid name is the Q.931 but not in any of the sip traffic to cucm. What command am I missing? Q.931 trace: earer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP gateway Caller id

[cid:image002.png@01CFA7DD.950B9910]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFA7DD.950B9910]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFA7DD.950B9910]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.s...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 7:28 AM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway error

Make sure your Expressway-C -- E link is up. TLS/certificates must validate for the C-E link to come up. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01CFAC4F.5BFB8D80]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

[cisco-voip] CUC 10.5 MWI

I have a new CUC 10.5 install. Using +E.164 extensions. I can leave a message and retrieve it through the phone. However, for any users it still says MWI status is Off. This would seem to be pretty simple, but not having any luck with it. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World

Re: [cisco-voip] CUC 10.5 MWI

- MediaSense and Unity Connection From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 12:26 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] CUC 10.5 MWI I have a new CUC 10.5 install. Using +E.164

Re: [cisco-voip] CUC 10.5 MWI

.755EB6A0]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFB30A.755EB6A0]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: Chris Ward (chrward) [mailto:chrw...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 1:03 PM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: CUC 10.5 MWI Ok, So MWI is not working. Do you have E.164

[cisco-voip] TVS Signed Certificates

If you used signed certificates by your enterprise CA for TVS, would that allow TVS to validate across multiple clusters if both clusters TVS certificates were signed by the same CA? I am trying to determine if there would ever be an advantage to doing a non-self signed certificate on the TVS.

[cisco-voip] Expressway - XMPP - Google Chat

Has anyone got XMPP federation with expressway-C/E to google chat to work? I can federate to the webex connect cloud with no issues. However, to google chat is a no-go. I moved federation directly to CUPS, and it worked like a champ. Running x8.2.1 and 10.5 for cucm and cups. Dennis Heim |

[cisco-voip] SME Codec Issue

We have an SME design, so leaf clusters connected to an SME via SIP. The SIP trunks go to the carrier and those terminate on the SME. The carrier requires that regardless of the codec that g.711 is an option. Any thoughts on how to make SME always advertise g.711 as an option? Dennis Heim |

[cisco-voip] ISDN 5ESS NFAS

Has anyone done NFAS with ISDN 5ESS Switch? I have seen some Cisco docs like this (http://www.2mul.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/voice/isdn/configuration/guide/15_1/vi_15_1_book.pdf). That seems to say it is supported.. Switch Type: Lucent 5ESS NFAS Type: Custom; does not support NFAS Switch Type:

[cisco-voip] RSVP for CAC

Is anyone using RSVP for CAC? I know it uses a special MTP to make the RSVP reservation. Does it actually nail up the call via this MTP or is it just used to signaling? Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814

Re: [cisco-voip] MSP VoIP Monitoring

There is also Voss-4-UC, which has RBAC and multi-tenancy. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01CFD8BF.BA3AC2C0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] MSP VoIP Monitoring

[cid:image002.png@01CFD8C1.39824480]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFD8C1.39824480]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFD8C1.39824480]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: Ryan Burtch [mailto:rburt...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:00 PM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] 79X0 and Plus Dialing

I need to get plus dialing working with 7940 and 7960's, are there any tricks that people have used in the past? Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01CFDC0B.38BF8420]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] masking internal caller ID?

The pesky mid-call update for xform patterns strikes again. As Brian mentioned, xlation patterns, or if you want to write something that uses the CURRI API ( Cisco unified Routing Rules Interface). Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA - CUCM in Mixed Mode

I never changed the cluster to mixed mode. It should still be in non-secure mode. What doc mentioned that? Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image002.png@01CFDD4E.9C0A44E0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] RESOLVED: Jabber for Windows 10.5 and Preferred Name field in LDAP/AD?

I’d love to see MRA/Expressway use LDAP. UDS with jabber has no support for filtering too, which can be just as annoying. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image002.png@01CFE232.22395AA0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 Tomcat Subject Alternate Name (SAN) (Alternatehostname) via CLI

]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFE30A.AC268F20]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFE30A.AC268F20]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) [mailto:rratl...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 2:53 PM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: Justin Steinberg; Jason Aarons (AM

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA deploy

What does the following show: Do this from an entity/pc on the outside? Nslookup Set type = all _collab-edge._tls.domain Does it resolve to your expressway-E’s address? Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814

Re: [cisco-voip] 7965s dropping like flies

POE switches and end devices are fairly sensitive to power over/under voltages. Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 -Original Message- From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Andrewartha

Re: [cisco-voip] Prime Collaboration Deployment Tool

PCD is a tool, it is not a complete upgrade and patching solution (sales/marketing). It has specific versions and specific tasks that it can do. Many things it cannot (verify with cco). It does work with all the caveats. You will need to upload all cop files and iso files to the PCD server.

[cisco-voip] Enable DNS

I have a 2 node cluster that currently has DNS disabled. My intention is to configure and enable DNS. I know this will regenerate all the certificates at once. My understanding is that as long as I do not do both nodes at the same time and all the endpoints register with the other server all

Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

[cid:image003.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:08 AM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:49 AM To: Heim, Dennis Cc

Re: [cisco-voip] CER 10.0(2) and 3850 Support

[cid:image003.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 7:07 AM To: Brian Meade Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CER 10.0(2

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI E1/T1 utilization

What protocol is your gateway running? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01D00525.739B97D0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

[cisco-voip] UCCX 10.X and CUCM 8.6

I saw some posts back from this summer with UCCX 10 connected with CUCM 8.6. Is that supported currently? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [cid:image001.png@01D00984.16F5B980]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI

Felt the need to add my daily dose of sarcasm… easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI… a backhoe. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] GoDaddy UCC Cert?

As of 10.5 SU1 we were still running into issues with the multi-server certificates not work. Supposedly it is fixed in SU2. However, we decided just to go with single server certs to resolve the issue. Anyone have it working on SU2 and not getting device resets? Dennis Heim | Emerging

Re: [cisco-voip] dx80 wallpaper resolution

I know when you do the screenshot off the device /CGI/Screenshot it shows 1920x1080. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have experience with OpenGear Console Manager or Infrastructure Manager?

Not sure the pricing. Cisco does have a 2901 Terminal Server Bundle, which is essentially a 2901 with octal serial cables on it. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway CE with multiple CUCM clusters

My understanding is that with the legacy VCS platform you can do 1:Many relationship. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs

This year will mark 10 years hold the CCVP/CCNP Voice for me, and mine expires Fall of this year. When I took all the exams there was still a gateway/gatekeeper exam. In my case basically I need to pass all the exams or achieve a CCIE Collaboration certification before my CCNP Voice expires.

Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs

What exam is required to convert CCNP voice to CCNP collaboration? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Applications - Default Gatweay

Does default gateway impact license mac? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei [chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com Innovation happens on

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 10.6 Updates

They have been dancing to agile for a little while.. or at least it makes a good excuse not to have a roadmap of upcoming features. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] Single PRI with multiple virtual trunk groups

I am guessing you would need some adtran magic. Sounds interesting… ;-). Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

[cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

What have others used when there is a need to mux PRI's over the IP network? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

PM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport What is the end goal? I've frequently used plain old voice gateways (as5350 is cheap). Setup dial peers and you are off and running for voice, unless you need pure transport for things like

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

[mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com] Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:33 PM To: Heim, Dennis Cc: Walenta, Philip; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport Is this what you are looking for? http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/interfaces/nm/hardware

Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective: 1. SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an Android feature. 2. No screen sharing in Webex. 3.

Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

with WebEx :) yes that seems like a critical fail to me On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, 11:40 AM Heim, Dennis dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote: I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendation For Certificate Provider For Jabber/Presence Use

For those windows clients you can run the following: certutil -verify -urlfetch Path-to-CUPS-tomcat-cert.cer That should show why the certificate is failing validation. If you use an internal ca to sign your certs include the following subject alternative names: DNS:FQDN DNS:Hostname

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway certificate advice required.

Traditionally, you put the public Certificate on the Expressway-E. This would traditionally contain SANs such as: DNS:Expe.domain.com DNS:domain.com DNS: conference-2-CUPSCluster1.domain.com If you are doing security you would have the secure profile names in there, and I believe persistent

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy

Multiple pubs is not supported. The appropriate approach is to use some type of VM backup and restore solution. This could be some scripts that you run on VMware that back up the vmx/vmdk files and zip them up, or it could be a solution such as Veeam. That way if everything goes to crap you can

Re: [cisco-voip] (no subject)

You could always do a migration with PCD, right? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei [chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com Innovation

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

://www.projectsquared.com Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room -Original Message- From: Daniel Pagan [mailto:dpa...@fidelus.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:28 PM To: Heim, Dennis; gen...@ucpenguin.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date

Re: [cisco-voip] DNIS Question

Out of the box no. You could leverage the Routing Rules API to build a policy and database lookup. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage

This is definitely interesting that you can migration between datastore’s even if a specific host does not have access. However, I think this is getting close to the just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. In today’s age it should be pretty easy to get a NFS mount that both hosts can

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM ver 8.x to 10.x licensing conversion

No they don’t. It is all determined based on owner id for the most part. Be prepared to find the Sales Order Numbers of your original order in order to provide what you are entitled to. Depending how long those orders were made determine how good of records Cisco has. Dennis Heim | Emerging

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5

PCD is a great tool for single-site installs or upgrades in a lab environment. Biggest limitation of PCD when multisites are involved, since it pushes all ISOs from the PCD server. Maybe an ability to leverage ISOs on VMWare datastores instead of from the PCD server. Dennis Heim | Emerging

Re: [cisco-voip] Hardware for UC

It all depends on the layer 8 of your environment and the size of your environment. If your environment is more than say 3-4 physical servers, then I would make a push for UCSM (UCS Manager). I think a compelling case could be made for the virtual san stuff that Brian mentioned coupled with UCS

Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party PBX integration

PIMG are EOL by Dialogic. My understanding is the TIMG is still being produced by Dialogic. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

[cisco-voip] SJC-This week

Anyone else in San Jose for the Collaboration festivities with Cisco this week? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA

Here is a lab guide from Cisco dcloud, that goes through a good portion of it. https://dcloud-rtp-web-1.cisco.com/dCloud/docs/Documents/pa_for_mm_video_10.5_v1/PA_for_MM_Video_Lab_Guide.pdf Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

When does Cisco usually release their new versions of all their stuff? Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com Click here to join me in my Collaboration

Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points

Don’t forget to add codec passthrough on all your MTP’s. otherwise it will pick software ones over the hardware ones. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

I think CER is still on its on island. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei [chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com Innovation happens on

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

, Dennis Cc: Scott Voll; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5 CER10 is managed by PLM10. On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Heim, Dennis dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote: I think CER is still on its on island. Dennis Heim | Emerging

[cisco-voip] Remove ELM/PLM Option

Is there a command to remove the ELM option from the webpage of CUCM? I have a dedicated ELM, and I thought there was a way to do this. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

Associate a ccm end user to the device and user those credentials to authenticate. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

Re: [cisco-voip] License requirements to upgrade from 12.4 to 15

2016 is last day of tac support for the 2800’s. Technically any code upgrade requires proper support. Ironically, the 1800/2800/3800 series lacked the ability to lock the ios by feature set other than say gatekeeper. When the G2’s came out we got feature locking. Then by around 15.2 we went

Re: [cisco-voip] PER CALL BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION OVER ETHERNET+802.1Q

With BiB it is 3x your codec. G.711 example: 1. 80k down far-end audio (remote party-current user) 2. 80k up current user audio (current user-remote party) 3. 80k up bib far-end audio (current user-recording server) 4. 80k up bib current user audio. (current

Re: [cisco-voip] BE7K Network card issue

I just turned up 6 BE7k’s this week, integrated to UCS Fabric Interconnects, but the NIC’s showed up out of the gate no problem. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

[cisco-voip] Cisco live

who all is in San Diego for Cisco Live? Sent from my iPhone ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco live

To: Daniel Pagan Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco live Anyone feel up for organizing a meet? On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:29 PM Daniel Pagan dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote: I'm also attending. Anthony: Nice! I'll be sure to do my best

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove ELM/PLM Option

squared -- http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/ Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim From: Erick [mailto:erick...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:28 PM To: Anthony Holloway Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

to see it. – Sheldon Cooper Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim From: Eric Pedersen [mailto:peders...@bennettjones.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:51 PM To: Anthony Holloway; Heim, Dennis; Ian Anderson; NateCCIE; Cisco VOIP Subject

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

Looks like another reason to move to 10.5(2)SU2A. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei [chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com There is a fine

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

multi server certificate. As per Cisco it required multi san certificate, still will it work with wild card ? Regards, Raaj Message: 1 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:29:39 + From: Anthony Holloway avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:cisco-v...@gmail.com To: Heim, Dennis dennis.h

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple Version of CUCM integrated with CER

Been down this design before… each CER Group/cluster can support 1 version of CUCM. So technically from a support perspective, you would need 2. Maybe you can get some temp licenses from Cisco? The issue is our good friend JCRAPI.. I mean JTAPI. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

nis.heim> From: Buchanan, James [mailto:jbucha...@presidio.com] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 5:03 AM To: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com>; norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: DRS Backups 10.5 Actually, it is only SFTP, right? FTP is not supported (a con

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

My preferred approach is to leverage a CSR1000v to do all the routing and then NAT that traffic out to the network. In the art of transparency, I am currently an architect for a Lab as a Service (LaaS) style service, and migrations is one of the primary use cases. Once the migration is done in

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

SFTP/FTP Is the supported mechanism. Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 [twitter] [chat][Phone][video] "There is a fine

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendations for new handsets

I would recommend the 8800's. There have been numerous bugs, but those will get resolved in due time. I'd imagine by the time you order, and it gets fulfilled, more of the major bugs will be resolved. The 7800/8800/DX/MX/IX is where you want to be from the future proof perspective. Dennis Heim

  1   2   >