Hello,
Grant Supp wrote:
I'm using Clam AV 0.80 with Qmail-Scanner 1.23 and receive the following lines in my
clamd.log:
Tue Oct 19 15:22:34 2004 -
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/newmail01.readyhosting.com109821735148216078/1098217354.16090-1.newmail01.readyhosting.com:
Trojan.Dropper.JS.Zerolin-6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have downloaded ver80 and now I'm not sure how to proceed.
I've read the manual but I can't info on how to upgrade, is
it best to remove the previous version or install over it.?
This came from someone on the list, I've just made a few minor changes
With ver 0.80
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 17:20:38 -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlook (or
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 19:51:48 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
[...]
Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem
to be
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 at 12:02:57 +0800, Awie wrote:
Finally I can supervise new version of clamd. There are some parameter of
clamav.conf that no need anymore in clamd.conf. After editing some lines, it
works well.
However, Qmail-scanner still has unrecognize command that I sure it should
be
From: Tomasz Papszun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 9:39 AM
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 19:51:48 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
[...]
Yes,
However, Qmail-scanner still has unrecognize command that I sure it
should
be OK.
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:50:22 EDT:4600: run
/usr/local/bin/clamdscan -r --disable-summary --max-recursion=10 --max-space
=10 /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/Cybergate10982874224824600 21
WARNING: Ignoring
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 0.75 to 0.80 on aix 5.2, using gcc 3.3.4
and gnu ld 2.15. configure script cannot find libmilter.
# ./configure --enable-milter
checking resolv.h usability... yes
checking resolv.h presence... yes
checking for resolv.h... yes
checking whether setpgrp
* Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-19 16:14]:
Its actually --no-summary although --disable-summary may still work.
Oh yes, thank you. I just removed all args that appeared in my log as
obsolete.
Alex
--
Alex Pleinerzeitform Internet Dienste
mailto:[EMAIL
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0700, Todd Lyons said:
Christopher X. Candreva wanted us to know:
Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
broke his own claim,
Awie wrote:
However, Qmail-scanner still has unrecognize command that I sure it
should
be OK.
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:50:22 EDT:4600: run
/usr/local/bin/clamdscan -r --disable-summary --max-recursion=10 --max-space
=10 /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/Cybergate10982874224824600 21
WARNING: Ignoring option
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I havrecommendaded ver80 and now I'm not sure how to proceed.
I've read the manual but I can't info on how to upgrade, is
it best to remove the previous version or install over it.?
This came from someone on the list, I've just made a few minor changes
With ver
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 0.75 to 0.80 on aix 5.2, using gcc 3.3.4
and gnu ld 2.15. configure script cannot find libmilter.
# ./configure --enable-milter
checking resolv.h usability... yes
checking resolv.h presence... yes
checking for resolv.h... yes
checking
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:29:37 -0400, Scott Rothgaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On FreeBSD 4.10 I get the following. Is this covered somewhere? 0.75.1
built without a hitch.
Have you tried installing it from the ports?
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
Scott Rothgaber wrote:
On FreeBSD 4.10 I get the following. Is this covered somewhere? 0.75.1
built without a hitch.
cd /usr/ports/security/clamav
make install clean
Worked fine for me.
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
rblayzor@(inoc.net|gmail.com)
PGP: http://www.inoc.net/~dev/
Key fingerprint
Hi,
I've got a strange problem I cannot track down.
After clean databases update, clamd refuses to start:
Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: clamdLibClamAV debug: Setting /var/tmp
as global temporary directory
LibClamAV debug: Loading databases from /var/lib/clamav
LibClamAV debug: Loading
Dmitry Alexeyev wrote:
If I remove all cvd files and do database update, clamd starts without
problems.
If freshclam gets called from cron, I get the following error.
Always the same line (2249), on both 0.75.1 and 0.80
Now HOW did you update your database without freshclam? manually copy
Rob MacGregor wrote:
Have you tried installing it from the ports?
Duh! I didn't think that it would be up so quickly. It's building, sans
complaints, right now.
Thanks for the tip!
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Just installed version 0.80.
clamdscan . runs fine saying
---
/usr/local/clamav/etc/./TestFile: ClamAV-Test-Signature FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 1
Time: 0.044 sec (0 m 0 s)
BUT clamscan -r . gives error message
-
LibClamAV Error:
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 17:53, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Dmitry Alexeyev wrote:
If I remove all cvd files and do database update, clamd starts
without problems.
If freshclam gets called from cron, I get the following error.
Always the same line (2249), on both 0.75.1 and 0.80
Now HOW
Hi,
I just installed ClamAV on a Debian Sarge machine and I got the option
to select the mirror for freshclam.
I choose the local mirror offered db.ar.clamav.net (ar is for
Argentina), but freshclam failed:
ClamAV update process started at Wed Oct 20 10:13:02 2004
Reading CVD header
Hello Mariano Absatz,
Would someone on both lists (or Luca) contact the people from
clamav.xmundo.net and ask them to add a single line
ServerAlias db.ar.clamav.net
within the virtual server with
ServerName clamav.xmundo.net
Thanks for notifying me of the problem. When I accept a new
Not to sound too obvious, but, does the directory /usr/ClamAV/data/
exist? (case sensitive)
-Mikel-
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:14:58 +0200, Frank Elsner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just installed version 0.80.
clamdscan . runs fine saying
---
/usr/local/clamav/etc/./TestFile:
Dmitry Alexeyev wrote:
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 17:53, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Dmitry Alexeyev wrote:
If I remove all cvd files and do database update, clamd starts
without problems.
If freshclam gets called from cron, I get the following error.
Always the same line (2249), on both
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:14:58 +0200, Frank Elsner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just installed version 0.80.
clamdscan . runs fine saying
---
[snip]
BUT clamscan -r . gives error message
-
LibClamAV Error: cl_loaddbdir(): Can't open directory /usr/ClamAV/data0
ERROR:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:11:53 -0400, Robin, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc version 2.95.2. BSDi 4.2 (i hate to be on a dead OS, moving to linux
soon).
LOL. You got that right.
I see anything that still use gcc 2.x as obsolete :)
___
Boguslaw Brandys wrote:
Is it always when scanning the same files ? Could You try another ?
Could You try the same file with OLE2 support disabled ?
I'm curious if this is OLE2 related
It seems to happen when scanning the same files. Untitled Attachment seems to cause
the problem evey
What I meant was if you run similar system, you could probably use my
build script, binaries, or config files if you get stuck with the
default source or RPM.
Since you use Linux 2.2 (on x86, I assume?) my Linux static binary
should work.
Thank you. Looks like I am kinda lost with all these
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:40:52 +0400
Dmitry Alexeyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I meant was if you run similar system, you could probably use
my build script, binaries, or config files if you get stuck with the
default source or RPM.
Since you use Linux 2.2 (on x86, I assume?) my Linux
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 19:50, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:40:52 +0400
Dmitry Alexeyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I meant was if you run similar system, you could probably
use my build script, binaries, or config files if you get stuck
with the default source or
Hi
http://assp.sourceforge.net/:
8. Basic anti-virus filtering using the ClamAV virus databases.
They should use libclamav. Currently that software will miss most of the
new malware. If you are with contact with them please ask them to remove the
above point from their main site as this is a
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:59:22 MDT Mikel Bauer wrote:
Not to sound too obvious, but, does the directory /usr/ClamAV/data/
exist? (case sensitive)
YES.
ls -la /usr/ClamAV/data/
total 1378
drwxrwxr-x2 clamav exim 2048 Oct 20 17:08 .
drwxrwxr-x 10 clamav root 2048 Oct
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:07:24 +0400
Dmitry Alexeyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it is interrupted cron job, network issues or anything else. I
I don't think so.
am pretty sure nothing changes database files after update. Perhaps it
is even filesystem issue, I don't know. Fingers crossed it
This is with clamav 0.80
I went to scan a Phishing scam email by using clamdscan. I'd forgotten to
change the perms on the file to be world-readable, but clamdscan reported:
[jhaar]$ clamdscan citifraud.eml
./citifraud.eml: Access denied. ERROR
./citifraud.eml: OK
So it saw the access denied
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:26:46 +1300
Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[jhaar]$ clamdscan citifraud.eml
./citifraud.eml: Access denied. ERROR
./citifraud.eml: OK
So it saw the access denied - but then it reports OK?
Fixed in CVS.
Keep up the good work guys - ClamAV is superb!!!
Thanks
I'm running mimedefang/spamassassin/clamav on an IRIX 6.5 machine and
have found that some files cause both clamd and clamscan to core.
Since I'm still running this combo, I can't forward the message to the
list, but it can be found at: ftp://ftp.heloc.com/pub/message.txt.gz
Here is the last bit
I'm running mimedefang/spamassassin/clamav on an IRIX 6.5 machine and
have found that some files cause both clamd and clamscan to core.
Since I'm still running this combo, I can't forward the message to the
list, but it can be found at: ftp://ftp.heloc.com/pub/message.txt.gz
Here is the
On Wednesday 20 Oct 2004 8:25 pm, Rob Dueckman wrote:
Since I'm still running this combo, I can't forward the message to the
list, but it can be found at: ftp://ftp.heloc.com/pub/message.txt.gz
I've built clam on Linux and have had no probems with the same file.
Could this somehow be a
On Wednesday 20 Oct 2004 8:31 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
I would guess you have an extra / at the end of the following line in
clamd.conf:
clamd.conf: TemporaryDirectory /var/tmp
I can't see how that is the problem since images 1-26 were saved OK and
the filename seems to be missing in part 27
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Gran wanted us to know:
Yes, inline signing would probably fix that issue.
In my last message, I see:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
Mime multipart is not inline signing.
It is an inline, gpg signed message. I had no
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 02:52 pm, Nigel Horne wrote:
2) What is IRIX?
IRIX is SGI's UNIX.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 15:52, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Wednesday 20 Oct 2004 8:31 pm, Ken Jones wrote:
I would guess you have an extra / at the end of the following line in
clamd.conf:
clamd.conf: TemporaryDirectory /var/tmp
we have no problem here. I have the line commented out thus
The man freshclam page says that -d requires --checks. If I call freshclam -d and
don't specify --checks, what happens? Does it revert to the value specified in
/etc/freshclam.conf's Checks setting? Or does it just check once when it starts and
never check again?
I'm confused as to what the
I am trying to convince my company to switch to open
source where possible. It is much easier if the
software has been evaluated by an independent group.
Unfortunately, reviews that I could find, including
GMX Systematic and Heise magazines, were negative. The
opinion seemed to be summed up by
Dave P wrote:
I am trying to convince my company to switch to open
source where possible. It is much easier if the
software has been evaluated by an independent group.
Unfortunately, reviews that I could find, including
GMX Systematic and Heise magazines, were negative. The
opinion seemed to be
Dear Clamav experts,
I just have a fresh clamav installed in FreeBSD 5.3 system.
I have a hard time to allocate the signature database in the system.
The following commandline have been using for update the signature:
clamav 15245 0.0 0.1 2060 1508 ?? Is7:13PM 0:00.03
Bill Randle wrote:
Dave P wrote:
Are there any independent tests out there that do not
paint such a bleak picture? Are there any plans to
submit ClamAV or ClamWin to Virus Bulletin?
[...]
I think a better test is side-by-side comparisons with standard,
commercial, products. If you search the
47 matches
Mail list logo
