I have installed the calm daemon from the synaptic package manager.but when i
use the command line to scan using the command calmdscan, i get error message
.please help me activate clamdscan.
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now!
On 04/17/2010 10:14 AM, Sanjay Pothen wrote:
I have installed the calm daemon from the synaptic package manager.but when i use the
command line to scan using the command calmdscan,
The daemon is called ClamAV daemon (clamd), and the client is called
clamdscan, not calmdscan.
i get error
2010/4/16 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com
Hi,
I just had a chat on #clamav with 2 people having problem with ClamAV 0.96
on FreeBSD 6.2. (everything was OK on FreeBSD 6.3)
The symptom is that clamscan/clamd never starts, just loops infinitely
trying to load the DB, --debug shows:
Hello Giampaolo Tomassoni,
Am 2010-04-16 17:55:16, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Maybe this happened, but I had two calls in the morning about this, for
maybe five mailing systems which stopped working. Most of them are not
easily upgradeable. After all, I can't care it the less. But what
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:25:24 -0500
Eric Rostetter rostet...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
Quoting Leonardo Rodrigues leolis...@solutti.com.br:
it's VERY common in the software industry to stop supporting old
versions, but they simply stay working.
For six months, you've been told to
Hello Giampaolo Tomassoni,
Hello Michelle,
It depends on what youmean with five small companies.
Here I have a bunch of such small companies with 3-5 employees...
where
I maintain the Intranet-Server. And since they are All-In-One-
Systems, one failure could take down the whole
Obviously neither side of the discussion can be convinced. It would
possibly be a good idea to through in some more general thoughts about
GPL'ed software.
If I understood RMS' basic intention right he is all for the freedom of
the _user_. This basically means no software vendor or supplier
Hello Giampaolo Tomassoni,
Am 2010-04-16 20:25:55, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
The way the clamav team managed this case hits the open software community
as a whole, being the ClamAV project a well-known member of that community.
No, -- it hit a minority of ignorants!
Thanks, Greetings
Hello ClamAV experts,
I run 4 dedicated Sun Fire X4100M2 (Dual CPU, Quad-Core, 16 GByte of
memory) as courier-mta-proxy with ClamAV and SpamAssassin but the
machines sucking to much energy.
Now I want to use some smaller networked machines which are Marvell
Kirkwood MV78200 with 2
On 04/17/2010 06:14 PM, neidorff wrote:
On 4/17/10, neidorffneido...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/17/10, Török Edwinedwinto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/17/2010 05:12 PM, neidorff wrote:
Help, please.
My system is old--Fedora Core 3--but it has been working as a mail server
(qmail from and
On 04/17/2010 07:25 PM, jef moskot wrote:
Hi, all.
I was on vacation for a bit and then wanted to wait for the EOL storm to
blow over. I never actually got any response to my original question,
which got sidetracked by a discussion of the FreeBSD port system.
At any rate, the original
At 2:14 PM +0100 4/16/2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
I hope that by now you may be realising that many people quite
legitimately did not know anything until things broke this morning.
We did not have 6 months notice - our servers just broke.
I'm sorry, did I miss something? This should be a
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I do not want to be you customer after reading your messages here
in this Mailinglsts, because I show, you have not a singel clue
about importance of software parts...
I'm still waiting for you to show something, moron.
Giampaolo
Good Morning
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
I'm still waiting for you to show something, moron.
Can the listmoms please throttle or remove this guy? This is roughly 50
messages containing the same rant over the last several days. There is
no argument that needs to be
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:53:49PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
Would you please show me the 50 messages you speak about?
Thanks.
I see off hand:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:12:15PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
On
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
... omissis ...
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 03:56:38PM +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni said:
Fine. You filed your request. Now the maillist admins will decide if I was
runting, there. And will take action if needed.
Ok?
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or else' is blackmail. Here
we have two
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or else' is blackmail.
Simon Hobson wrote:
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or
At 01:14 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
First, anyones system that stopped sending mail, it was not a
malicious act just that their system can not handle the signature
update that was sent out.
Secondly, they all had both the chance to update before it happened
OR configure their systems to
Dan wrote:
So keeping up to date has it's own risks - hence why many people
take the attitude of if it aint broke, don't fix it.
But being a YEAR out of date?
Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
Like I said, there ARE legitimate reasons for not always updating
every bit of software
Simon Hobson wrote:
Jim Preston wrote:
According to this reasoning, I know of website that consistently
causes browsers to shut down. This website is a legitimate business
site, Should this site be prosecuted under this law?
In response to your example, that was a DOS attack and is illegal.
Ralf Quint wrote:
At 01:14 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
First, anyones system that stopped sending mail, it was not a
malicious act just that their system can not handle the signature
update that was sent out.
Secondly, they all had both the chance to update before it happened
OR
lists wrote:
Anything else I can help you with?
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
--
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
___
Help us build a
At 9:39 PM +0100 4/17/2010, Simon Hobson wrote:
Dan wrote:
So keeping up to date has it's own risks - hence why many people
take the attitude of if it aint broke, don't fix it.
But being a YEAR out of date?
Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
Like I said, there ARE legitimate reasons
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Is g++ the same version too (i.e. does g++ -v shows 4.2.1 too?).
Yep, same deal:
# g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
For the record, no checks failed, although some were skipped:
make check-TESTS
PASS: check_clamav
PASS:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jim Preston wrote:
...snip..
According to this reasoning, I know of website that consistently causes
browsers to shut down. This website is a legitimate business site, Should
this site be prosecuted under this law?
In response to your
At 02:03 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
Ralf Quint wrote:
How can people trust any Open Source software if someone else
decides at will which operational systems are being shut down,
which services are being interrupted.
By configuring your systems to be tolerant of such failures of
Whats the difference between:
clamav-0.96rc1-19.1.i586.rpm
and:
clamav-0.96-27.1.i586.rpm
?
I am thinking of the RC specification of the package.
Which one should I choose for my SLED_10_SP3?
I have usually installed and updated the rpms without the RC
specification, but by a coincidence I chose
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Those two lines look fairly clear to me. Essentially they're
telling you to get moving, get the update onto your to-be-done
list. This is, of course, re-enforced by the repeated EOL
announcements on Clam-announce.
I can think of two other ways this could
Hi list,
As many, I've been affected by 0.94 EOL process. I successfully upgraded
Clamav to 0.96 version but I'm still suffering from not being able to use
it. I got this error:
# /usr/sbin/clamd
LibClamAV debug: Initialized 0.96 engine
LibClamAV debug: Initializing phishcheck module
LibClamAV
Christian Gonzalez wrote:
Hi list,
As many, I've been affected by 0.94 EOL process. I successfully upgraded
Clamav to 0.96 version but I'm still suffering from not being able to use
it. I got this error:
Hi Christian,
please open a ticket at http://bugs.clamav.net
Just copy/paste the info
Si St wrote:
Whats the difference between:
clamav-0.96rc1-19.1.i586.rpm
and:
clamav-0.96-27.1.i586.rpm
?
The RC is a release canditate package. It was issued before the final
0.96 release (the non-RC package).
I am thinking of the RC specification of the package.
Which one should I choose
Christian Gonzalez wrote:
Hi list,
As many, I've been affected by 0.94 EOL process. I successfully upgraded
Clamav to 0.96 version but I'm still suffering from not being able to
use
it. I got this error:
Hi Christian,
please open a ticket at http://bugs.clamav.net
Just copy/paste the
Michelle Konzack wrote:
SpamAssassin works already, but what must I do if I like to use ClamAV
over network with 4-12 scanning machines?.
Hi Michelle,
a definite answer would require a better knowledge about your
environment. Also I'm not a courier-mta user.
However here are some generic
Ralf Quint wrote:
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Those two lines look fairly clear to me. Essentially they're telling
you to get moving, get the update onto your to-be-done list. This
is, of course, re-enforced by the repeated EOL announcements on
Clam-announce.
I can think of two
At 2:30 PM -0700 4/17/2010, Ralf Quint wrote:
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Yea, I agree, the Clam team probably could have done things better.
But would more announcements or warnings have really made a
difference? Why would the people, that regularly ignore the
Freshclam warnings, pay
Dan wrote:
At 2:30 PM -0700 4/17/2010, Ralf Quint wrote:
At 02:09 PM 4/17/2010, Dan wrote:
Yea, I agree, the Clam team probably could have done things better.
But would more announcements or warnings have really made a
difference? Why would the people, that regularly ignore the
Freshclam
On 4/17/10 9:03 PM, Jim Preston wrote:
I whole heartedly agree Dan. However I have been slandered today being
called arrogant and ignorant, so what do I know?
Yutz on the left, mench on the right. This EOL process has been a test. It was a
simple test to separate yutz from mench. If you
39 matches
Mail list logo
