Is anyone using the SerSol 360Link API in a real-world production or
near-production application? If so, I'm curious what you are using it for,
what your experiences have been, and in particular if you have information on
typical response times of their web API. You could reply on list or off
The other confusing thing is it depends on what you mean by Dublin
Core. The phrase has been used to refer to _at least_ two entirely
different things:
1) A (very) simple list of data elements, that is a controlled
vocabulary for fields.
2) A much more complex standard way of building out
The thing is, the NoSQL stuff is pretty much just a key-value store.
There's generally no way to query the store, instead you can simply
look up a document by ID.
If this meets the needs of your application, all you need is a key-value
store, and not any kind of query, then it's definitely
PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
The thing is, the NoSQL stuff is pretty much just a key-value store.
There's generally no way to query the store, instead you can simply look
up a document by ID.
Actually, this depends largely on the NoSQL DBMS in question. Some
are key
There are at least TWO good marc2json formats, and several open source
scripts at least for Bill Dueber's, no?
Benjamin Young wrote:
On 4/12/10 4:47 PM, Ryan Eby wrote:
You could put your logs, marc records broken out by fields or
arrays/hashes (types in couchdb) in any of them but the
I'm trying to get a handle on the new policy as compared to the old policy, and
what it really means. All in all, it seems much more vague than the first
draft, no longer trying to be an obligatory legal contract like the first
draft was -- in this way more similar to the old 1987 policy.
If
to announce
things on the main list, such as we're holding this here event, and/or if
you are interested in this event, sign up on this related discussion list. I'm
not a big fan of architecting to an end case, and it feels like that's what
this is.
-- jaf
On Apr 9, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Jonathan
I live in fear of the day that spammers discover they can get on
planet.code4lib.org (actually a fairly highly google ranked page) by tagging on
delicious. Probably have to drop delicious from the planet.code4lib at that
point.
From: Code for
We are stuck between two problems, with some people thinking only one of these
is/would be a problem, and others not caring at all either way:
* Local conference/meetup planning chatter overwhelms the listserv when it's on
the main listserv
* People don't find out about local
For that matter, if you're interested in managing a jobs.code4lib.org
site, we could probably do something like that.
Ed Summers wrote:
Hey Charles,
How do these jobs end up on your blog again? It seems like you have a
lot of good content. Given the number of jobs that are posted on here
and
Anyone know if there's any developer documentation for Zotero on it's
use of unAPI? Alternately, anyone know where I can find the answers to
these questions, or know the answers to these questions themselves?
1. What formats will Zotero use via unAPI. What mime content-types does
it use to
/extension/trunk/translators/unAPI.js
i'd say:
ad 1. RECOGNIZABLE_FORMATS = [mods, marc, endnote, ris,
bibtex, rdf] also see function checkFormats
ad 2. the order listed above
ad 4.: from my experience the unapi scraper takes precedence over coins
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk
, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Wait, does it actually recognize the format by the format _name_ used, and
not by a mime content-type? Like unless my unAPI server calls the endnote
format endnote, it won't recognize it? That would be odd, and good to
know. I thought the unAPI format
RIS output is
better than my endnote output, but there's no way for me to tell
Zotero that. For Mirlyn I ended up just having exactly one format
listed in my unapi-server file. Which is dumb. But I'm not sure what
else to do.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote
I don't have enough experience with that problem area to be sure of
what's out there and what would work, but I was pretty impressed with
the presentation on the XC Metadata Toolkit at the recent Code4Lib
conference, I think it is designed to do at least some, if not all, of
your tasks you
Karen Coyle wrote:
The OL only has full text links, but the link goes to a page at the
Internet Archive that lists all of the available formats. I would
prefer that the link go directly to a display of the book, and offer
other formats from there (having to click twice really turns people
Ah, I hadn't known about Oloh, that looks pretty nice thanks Galen.
What sorts of repos can oloh work with? Or does oloh not even get into
the repo level, it's just a registration of projects or something?
Galen Charlton wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk
Hmm, just because a given page is linked to from a wikipedia page, can
one assume that the target of the link is about the same thing as the
original page? I'm not sure how often this assumption would be violated?
Ed Summers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Lars Aronsson
Plus'ing it is one thing, but I have no idea what such a thing would actually
look like (interface-wise), or how it would be accomplished. I'm not sure what
it means exactly. It's an interesting idea, but anyone have any idea what it
would actually look like?
Hmm, an aggregated feed of the
Are you sure you're talking Javascript, and not Java?
I'm used to valueForKey from Apple Objective C and Java code. It's a
pattern/idea originally imported from NextStep/Objective C, and put into Apple
classes even in Java. something.valueForKey(key) is nothing more or less than
calling
code4lib code (was: newbie)
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
Hmm, an aggregated feed of the commit logs (from repos that offer
feeds, as most do), of open source projects of interest to the
code4lib community. Would that be at all useful?
I think that's a start but I'd imagine
not seeing a problem.
Jonathan
Karen Coyle wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
A big mistake, if it means what we think it means, that RDA has decided
that a given Manifestation can not contain several Expressions.
I'm not sure they've actually stated that, although that seems
If you model work of works MobyDick+A, then you've simply got to make
sure the contains relationship is there to the simple work Moby
Dick, right?
Then that would allow the particular manifestation of MobyDick+A to be
grouped with all the MobyDicks, since the system knows it contains a
A big mistake, if it means what we think it means, that RDA has decided
that a given Manifestation can not contain several Expressions.
Riley, Jenn wrote:
What the RDA folks (that is, the folks
who have created RDA, the JSC members) said (some of them off-list to
me), is that if your
¹ (etc.)
* Names that haven¹t made it into an authority record are definitely
helpful, but can we suggest a way to sort and rank them more usefully (for
the user) on the page?
Your thoughts?
Ya¹aqov
On 3/19/10 2:35 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I don't think
¹ (etc.)
* Names that haven¹t made it into an authority record are definitely
helpful, but can we suggest a way to sort and rank them more usefully (for
the user) on the page?
Your thoughts?
Ya¹aqov
On 3/19/10 2:35 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
I don't think
I don't think the inclusion of non-NAF headings in Identities is a flaw, it's a
benefit to the purpose of Identities not to be held back by the somewhat
glacial pace of change in NAF. But you're right, the right tool for the job, I
don't know that any of the existing OCLC free (or included
Karen Coyle wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
So there's no way to call an aggregate a Work/Expression _instead of_
a manifestation, if that aggregate is an actual physical item in your
hand.
No, no one said instead of. What the RDA folks (that is, the folks
who
cares much.
I would like to see ind1 and ind2 get their own fields, though, for easier
use of stuff like jsonpath in json-centric nosql databases.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.eduwrote:
I would just ask why you didn't use Bill Dueber's already existing
proto
was
specifically looking for a mention of collections. newline-delimited JSON
would work, yes, and probably be easier / faster / less memory-intensive to parse.
Dan
Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu 03/18/10 10:41 AM
So do you think the marc-hash-to-json proto-spec should suggest
Joe Hourcle wrote:
The group's two proposals were to model aggregates as works, or as
manifestatons, so RDA seems to be on their own modeling them as
expressions:
See, this is what I don't understa.d As works, or as manifestations??
In the FRBR model, every single manifestation belongs
Karen Coyle wrote:
And if the individual things inside the aggregate ALSO exist on their
own independently (or in OTHER aggregations)... and you want to model
that (which you may NOT want to spend time modelling in the individual
cases, depending on context)... dont' those individual things
Karen Coyle wrote:
I think this becomes a question of how we express WEMI -- you can
always link from/to any WEMI using contains or contained in -- so
you can always link to all of the Works in an aggregate. What I would
like to achieve is for different decisions (like one community
Bill's format would allow there to be a control field and a data field
with the same tag, however, so it's all good either way.
Ere Maijala wrote:
On 03/15/2010 06:22 PM, Houghton,Andrew wrote:
Secondly, Bill's specification looses semantics from ISO 2709, as I
previously pointed out. His
If a text aggregate is an expression -- that expression must belong to
SOME work though, right?
And if the individual things inside the aggregate ALSO exist on their
own independently (or in OTHER aggregations)... and you want to model
that (which you may NOT want to spend time modelling in
I would just ask why you didn't use Bill Dueber's already existing
proto-spec, instead of making up your own incomptable one.
I'd think we could somehow all do the same consistent thing here.
Since my interest in marc-json is getting as small a package as possible
for transfer accross the
Michael Beccaria wrote:
We will be switching over to VuFind this summer and I will likely use GB
in a similar way with that interface as well. I plan (hopefully this
summer) to build a web service that uses OCLC Web Services, Open
Library, Hathi Trust, and Google Books to search for and return
(Code4Lib listserv, Robert McDonald CC'd). I have a question about the
Bloomington Code4Lib conference proposal. (I would personally be quite happy
for the conference to be in Bloomington).
I note that the actual IU conference center has under 200 rooms. Probably not
enough for all attendees
There's nobody to ask formal permission for, but I think you've done the
right thing by suggesting it on this listserv and seeing what the
community thinks.
As one member of the community, I think that's a great idea and an
appropriate use of the code4Lib name, and I expect that everyone else
As usual, I'm great at sending the WORST messages to the wrong list. My
email client is messing up all over. Please do not reply to that one on
list, please ignore it, and Eric please remove it from teh archives is
possible.
Man, today is not my day. I've got to stop using email for a year
In this case, I have nobody to blame but my email client autocomplete,
and the fact that i had to try to send the message like five times to
get it to go through, and one of those times didn't catch my
autocomplete doing the wrong thing.
Mike Taylor wrote:
On 8 March 2010 17:04, Jonathan
Plus I believe you are prohibited by terms of service from using the
Terminologies service for cataloging.
So let's say that in some cases, if you aren't using it for cataloging,
and are willing to deal with no service assurance, Terminologies service
can replace other databases. I'm sure
If you live on the same continent as me, I'm pretty sure Asheville NC is a lot
closer to the east coast than to the west, no?
It was, however, in West Carolina, a state I hadn't previously known existed.
(Just kidding).
From: Code for Libraries
to removing delicious as well
+1 to jrochkind using his discretion
-Mike
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu
wrote:
Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet.
CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make
your
Why would the fact that they are both in Canada make you (or anyone
else) have to choose between them? I'm not following. One is in Feb,
one is in (what?) September. If you can go to two confs one in Feb and
one in Sep when one is in somewhere in Canada and one is in somewhere in
the US...
, if photos
must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed readers
don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at least
that many in these past few days.
I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan Rochkind
rochk
, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet.
CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case (on
list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the planet
I'm exersizing my editorial
Do you mean what's the mime-type for RIS files? (RIS != Refworks, I forget
what RIS stands for, but it's used by many reference managers, and may have
originally been invented by EndNote?)
There isn't a registered MIME type for RIS. Googling around, it looks like the
preferred one is:
send Refworks
their preferred tagged format now, I just don't know what MIME type to use.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Do you mean what's the mime-type for RIS files? (RIS != Refworks, I
forget what RIS stands for, but it's used by many reference
Awesome, thanks so much Jill.
I am on a manifest for Sunday airport-to-hotel. When arriving at the
Asheville airport, how do I find this van? [ This info may be on the
wiki somewhere I'm missing, sorry! ]
Jonathan
Jill Ellern wrote:
Hey Code4Lib attendees,
Well I spend another day in
Do you mean MARC-XML?
http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/
But I'm not sure schemas exist that will actually validate the semantic
content you want validated.
Jonathan
Houghton,Andrew wrote:
Does anybody know whether the MARC formats at:
http://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/
I know I've seen documetnation on the LC site before for since-abandoned
marc bib tags, like 400. But I can't for the life of me find it now
navigating around the website or googling. does anyone know where this is?
Jonathan
==
David Walker
Library Web Services Manager
California State University
http://xerxes.calstate.edu
From: Code for Libraries [code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Rochkind [rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:59 AM
Ha! Are librarians known subversives or something? Or maybe it just
sounded like the sort of thing you'd be bringing large amounts of
merchandise back from, that you might be trying to escape paying import
taxes on. Sounded erroneously like that, in fact, because even ALA is
not generally
Americans can no longer get into Canada without passports, even driving
accross the border. Not even a birth certificate will do anymore.
Officially this went into effect last spring sometime, but they had a
delayed grace period, which I'm guessing is up, or at least I wouldn't
want to risk
Taking time to explore is rarely a a waste of time in this area, because
exploring is how you learn in programming/software engineering.
marijane white wrote:
I may have worded that poorly, abstract reasons to choose a language was
exactly what I was looking for.
Your suggestion matches my
if it doesn't!
Please note that final drafts must always be approved by a vote of the
Editorial Committee before being published; in this case we'll
definitely want to make sure the article is constructive and not an attack.
Looking forward to working with you,
Jonathan Rochkind
Something I tried to write about in my article in LJ, is, yes, every
project needs to start somewhere. But you need to evaluate your own
capacity, and compare that against the maturity of the software and the
community. You need more internal capacity to deal with immature
software with an
I think you may find yourself somewhat in the minority in thinking
Apache is bad software. (I certainly have my complaints about it, but in
general I find it more robust, flexible, and bug-free than just about
any other software I work with).
But aside from getting into a war about some
Francis Kayiwa wrote:
IMHO good open source software is driven by people with an itch to fix.
The community develops and can be cultivated around this itch rather
than world domination. The project _MUST_ well documented [0] ideally
actively maintained. The support of this software will
Quality of code in general: How well-designed is the code
architecture, for maintenance and debugging? [This not only matters if
you plan to do in-house development with it, but matters for predicting
how likely the product is to stay 'alive' and continue to evolve with
the times, instead
Putting it on a wiki anyone can edit makes it, perhaps, somewhat more
likely that it ends up maintained longer, making it easier for other
people to get involved in maintaining it without technological barriers
or proprietary feelings getting in the way.
Jonathan
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On
So, character encodings are really confusing, even for those who have
dealt with them before. I'm not sure if there is a good 'dealing with
character encodings for dummies' book, but if there is, I think I could
use it too!
But from your case, I can say:Ideally your source records are in
I would appreciate that too. And if you want to write an article for the
Code4Lib Journal on how it differs from other IR software, why you did
it, and how you did it, it would be welcome. :)
Jonathan
Michael Beccaria wrote:
Nathan,
Can you summarize how the IR+ software is different than
, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
Well, here's the trick about handles, as I understand it. A handle, for
instance, a DOI, is 10.1074/jbc.M004545200.
Well, actually, it could be:
10.1074/jbc.M004545200
doi:10.1074/jbc.M004545200
info:doi/10.1074
of obliquely say this.
http://www.handle.net/factsheet.html
Anyway, good to have it made explicit.
Tom
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
The actual handle ...
/46087
I suppose I should have understood this point since the Handle service
does sort of obliquely say this.
http://www.handle.net/factsheet.html
Anyway, good to have it made explicit.
Tom
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
The actual handle ...
So I have no actual experience with this.
But you have to pay for DOI's. I've never done it, but I don't think
you neccesarily have to run your own purl server -- CrossRef takes care
of it. Of course, if your documents are going to be moving all over the
place, if you run your own purl
Bucknell, Terry wrote:
Note that as well as registering DOIs for the articles in LLT, LLT would be
obliged to link to the articles cited by LLT articles (for cited articles that
have DOIs too).
Huh, I didn't know that. I understand the motivation, but investigating
whether every cited
As a practical matter, I need to get my travel approvals and make my
travel plans quite in advance. I can only get approval for a pre-conf I
know about, so if a pre-conf comes too late, it won't be something I can
possibly attend.
I expect I am not alone here.
I would suggest that you should
Cloutman, David wrote:
of software.) However, because of the way the application is
architected, there are some key parts of the application that I do not
want loaded into the repository, such as temporary files that store a
PID.
You may be able to simply use svn-ignore settings to
But that doesnt' prevent people discussing AquaBrowser in other forums
as well, does it?
Joe Atzberger wrote:
I'm fairly confident there is not, just that the new list intends to (self-)
select just licensed users.
--Joe
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Cloutman, David
Hi all, I'm writing some marc record display code, and I have a question
about the 'right' way to display LCSH headings.
LCSH headings are typically displayed with -- between components. But
looking at the MARC, it looks like the -- punctuation isn't actually
in the MARC field. (A rare
associated with the content of subfield $v, $x,
$y, and $z.
From http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd600.html
-Tod
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Hi all, I'm writing some marc record display code, and I have a
question about the 'right' way to display LCSH headings
/bibliographic/bd600.html
-Tod
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Hi all, I'm writing some marc record display code, and I have a
question about the 'right' way to display LCSH headings.
LCSH headings are typically displayed with -- between components.
But looking
O.Stephens wrote:
True. How, from the OpenURL, are you going to know that the rft is meant
to represent a website?
I guess that was part of my question. But no one has suggested defining a new
metadata profile for websites (which I probably would avoid tbh). DC doesn't
seem to offer a
Wait, are you really going to try to do this with _SFX_ too? I missed
that part. Oh boy. Seriously, I think you are in for a world of painful
hacky kludge.
Rosalyn Metz wrote:
Owen,
The reason I suggest a source parser rather than a target parser is
that handling the openurl based on the
O.Stephens wrote:
Thanks Rosalyn,
As you say we could push a custom value into rfr_genre. I'm a bit torn on this,
as I guess I'm trying to do something that isn't 'hacky' - or at least not from
the OpenURL end of it. It might be that this is just wishful thinking, and that
I'm just trying to
Most link resolvers aren't going to know what to do with that -- they
aren't going to know that that OpenURL is meant to represent a web page,
and that the URL in rft_id should be provided to the user.
In general, identifiers in URI form are put in rft_id that are NOT meant
for providing to
, out of curiosity, will your own link resolver software
automatically take rft_id's and display them to the user as links?
Jonathan
Eric Hellman wrote:
Could you give us examples of http urls in rft_id that are like that?
I've never seen such.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Jonathan Rochkind
Eric Hellman wrote:
http://catalog.library.jhu.edu/bib/NUM identifies a catalog record- I
mean what else would you use to id the catalog record. unless you've
implemented the http-range 303 redirect recommendation in your catalog
(http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/), it shouldn't be construed
be a good one for it.
just my 2 cents.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.eduwrote:
Well, in the 'wild' I barely see any rft_id's at all, heh. Aside from the
obvious non-http URIs in rft_id, I'm not sure if I've seen http URIs that
don't resolve to full text
Yes, what Nate said is what I'm trying to say.
Nate, they aren't _trying_ to use the target URL as a uniquely
identifying key. They're _trying_ to use it as... a target URL! They
just can't find anywhere but rft_id to stick a target URL.
But the problem with that is exactly what Nate
to
do.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Eric Hellman wrote:
http://catalog.library.jhu.edu/bib/NUM identifies a catalog record-
I mean what else would you use to id the catalog record. unless
you've implemented the http-range 303 redirect recommendation
other than
OpenURL to use, especially one that's not just library world and (unlike
OpenURL IMO) makes easy things simple and provides flexibility to do
more complicated things more complicatedly... I'd never consider using
OpenURL.
Jonathan
Mike Taylor wrote:
2009/9/14 Jonathan Rochkind
Yep, that's a pretty good summary of my personal advice Joe, thanks.
Obviously others like Eric may have other opinions, that's just mine.
Joe Hourcle wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Mike Taylor wrote:
2009/9/14 Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu:
Seriously, don't use OpenURL unless you
to discover whether a url leads somewhere or not.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
I disagree. Putting URIs that unamiguously identify the referent,
and in some cases provide additional 'hooks' by virtue of additional
identifiers (local bibID, OCLCnum, LCCN, etc
O.Stephens wrote:
I guess it is part of the reason that I'm asking the question, as if we also
know that the rft was a website, it would be very odd behaviour (I think) to
use an http URI in the rft_id that wasn't the website URL?
True. How, from the OpenURL, are you going to know that the
I still think that rft_id IS meant to be a unique identifier! Again,
5.2.1 of z3988 says of the *_id fields:
An Identifier Descriptor unambiguously specifies the Entity by means of
a Uniform Resource Identifier
(URI).
I guess 'unambiguous' isn't exactly the same thing as 'unique',
I am a big fan of the original Design Patterns book, myself.
http://www.amazon.com/Design-Patterns-Elements-Reusable-Object-Oriented/dp/0201633612
But just reading the book alone won't do as much as reading the book AND
working with code that is written using the lessons of the book.
The
Duplantis, Patricia A. wrote:
On- and off-site redundant back-up of all critical hardware and systems is and will continue to be performed by GPO.
I don't really understand how this is consistent with:
Though the hardware configuration was restored, GPO has worked continuously, including
Anyone familiar with XML schemas (.xsd)?
Can you help me figure something out. Is there something in the schema
that specifies what elements can serve as the 'root node'... or is any
element described in the schema avaialable for use as a 'root node', and
it'll still validate?
Thanks for
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
I heard someplace recently that APIs are the newest form of vendor
lock-in. What's your take?
When they are custom vendor-specific APIs and not standards-based APIs,
they can definitely function that way. I'm still not sure if even a
vendor-specific API is more or
Yeah, just to counter the pro-Stallman mania, I personally would be
completely non-plussed by Stallman as a keynote speaker, based on my
experience seeing him before. But I guess that's why we vote.
David Fiander wrote:
If you were to invite Stallman as your keynote, that would certainly
make
I do think that what language you choose to learn in will effect what
you learn though. As someone else mentioned, which was a good point,
being exposed to good code is the best thing to help you learn to write
it. And on that basis, PHP is maybe not a good choice, and Perl can
be...
Also note, as far as wiki posts, for those at a slightly more
intermediate level, me and BillDueber tried starting this out, to try
and develop some common knowledge about how to make a shared open source
codebase that can actually be shared and not forked.
Please feel free to add to or edit
When I've experimented with this, I haven't been able to figure out a
way to set my institution in their preferences, without _removing_ any
existing institutions they may have already chosen. I don't want to
over-write their existing preferences, if any, I just want to add my
institution to
Apache docs say:
*Notice:* If your webserver's URLs are *not* directly related to
physical file paths, you have to use |RewriteBase| in every |.htaccess|
files where you want to use |RewriteRule| directives.
So probably not. I don't use .htaccess files that much myself. But
I've run into
If you do find the answer, let me know. I've been looking for a while
too, and unsuccesful. Thanks for that pointer to that weird workaround
to variables in the right-hand side, I didn't know about that and it
could be useful.
mod_rewrite totally drives me to mythical sendmail levels of
I agree with Ere that XML isn't the real issue here, in understanding
why embedding HTML in MARC is nevertheless something to be avoided if at
all possible. :)
Ere Maijala wrote:
Jon Gorman wrote:
You could substitute XML with e.g. Base64 encoding if it makes thinking
about this stuff
401 - 500 of 752 matches
Mail list logo
