jenkins test already sent out email notification, but appear to be stuck

HI, I saw this couple of times lately: A jenkins test job have finished running test, updating the corresponding jira and sending out email notification. However, the test report is not ready at the the link sent in the email, and the console link shows that the job is still running. I wonder if

Re: TestIPC failures in Jenkins

Thanks Arpit for throwing this discussion as part of HADOOP-10888 investigation! It's a good guess of Arpit's about possible missing /etc/hosts entry. Please feel free to comment in HADOOP-10888 so information can be centralized there. Best regards, --Yongjun On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:07 PM,

Re: TestIPC failures in Jenkins

don't see it in the ::1 row for IPv6 in /etc/hosts file. I wonder if adding asf900 as an entry to ::1 row would make it work. The method stuck at is java.net.Inet4AddressImpl.getLocalHostName (IPv4) though. Thanks. --Yongjun On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com

Re: TestIPC failures in Jenkins

, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Arpit for throwing this discussion as part of HADOOP-10888 investigation! It's a good guess of Arpit's about possible missing /etc/hosts entry. Please feel free to comment in HADOOP-10888 so information can be centralized

Re: TestIPC failures in Jenkins

Thanks Ted, I just filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8097. --Yongjun On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: Have you filed an INFRA JIRA so that infrastructure team can fix this ? Cheers On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh

Re: TestIPC failures in Jenkins

should be critical. Cheers On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Ted, I just filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8097. --Yongjun On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: Have you filed an INFRA

Re: TestIPC failures in Jenkins

, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Giridharan Kesavan gkesa...@hortonworks.com wrote: ASF infra folks doesn't support jenkins build infrastructure. You should send an email to bui...@apache.org -giri On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Ted, I agree

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.5.0 RC2

+1 (non-binding), pending the document issue Akira found out + downloaded src tarball and did build + deployed two pseudo-distributed clusters + ran some sample mapreduce job on one cluster + ran basic distcp test between the two clusters Thanks. --Yongjun On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:35 PM,

a script to find out flaky tests of Hadoop jenkins job

: org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSClientRetries.testNamenodeRestart [yzhang@localhost jenkinsftf]$ On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, I just noticed that the recent jenkin test report doesn't include link to test result, however, the email notice does show the failed tests: E.g

Re: a script to find out flaky tests of Hadoop jenkins job

putting this tool in dev-support directory ? Thanks On Aug 30, 2014, at 11:10 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, I developed a tool to detect flaky tests of hadoop jenkins test jobs, on top of the initial work Todd Lipcon did. We find it quite useful, and with Todd's

Re: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6

Thanks Arun for the info and reminder. Hi Alejandro, HADOOP-10895 is a blocker in the list Arun sent out and it's currently owned by you. I wonder whether you will have time to work on. If not, would you mind reassigning it to me and I will spend time on it? Thanks. --Yongjun On Tue, Oct 14,

Re: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6

Hi, I posted a patch to hadoop-10895 couple of days back. Wonder if anyone could help doing a review? Thanks a lot. --Yongjun On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Arun for the info and reminder. Hi Alejandro, HADOOP-10895 is a blocker

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

Thanks Arun for leading the 2.6 release effort. +1 (non-binding) - Downloaded rc1 source and did build - Created two single-node clusters running 2.6 - Ran sample mapreduce job - Ran distcp between two clusters --Yongjun On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com

submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Hi, One issue to report here, any help would be greatly appreciated! I noticed that multiple patch submissions to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11293 did not trigger jenkins test run. Thanks Chris Nauroth for the help to trigger one manually for me:

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

problems with that for me a few months back. If you break it up per-project, it should work just fine. -Ray On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: Adding builds@apache On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

For all's info, confirmed what Ray stated, indeed it's the reason! Thanks. --Yongjun On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Many thanks Ray, good to know! --Yongjun On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Ray Chiang rchi...@cloudera.com wrote: Your patch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

Hi Suresh, I did review HDFS-6833 and the patch Shinichi provided a while back. It's not really directly related to replication factor. The problem reported there is, DirectoryScanner tries to register with NN blocks already scheduled to be deleted as regular blocks, due to the delay in block

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Hortonworks http://hortonworks.com/ On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: For all's info, confirmed what Ray stated, indeed it's the reason! Thanks. --Yongjun On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

consolidated patches on a HADOOP jira to get pre-commit coverage when changes span multiple sub-projects. Yongjun, if you haven't already done so, I suggest filing a jira for this. Chris Nauroth Hortonworks http://hortonworks.com/ On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

a personal choice On 21 November 2014 at 19:10, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: bq. include a revision number in the patch file name +1 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, When I look at patches uploaded to jiras, from time

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

...@gmail.com wrote: bq. include a revision number in the patch file name +1 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, When I look at patches uploaded to jiras, from time to time I notice that different revisions of the patch

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Thanks all for the feedback. To summarize (and I have a suggestion at the end of this email), there are two scenarios: 1. A change that span multiple *bigger* projects. r.g. hadoop, hbase. 2. A change that span multiple *sub* projects* within hadoop, e.g., common, hdfs, yarn For 1, it's

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, When I look at patches uploaded to jiras, from time to time I notice that different revisions of the patch is uploaded with the same patch file name, some time for quite a few times. It's confusing which is which. I'd suggest

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

appreciate a revision number in the name. From: Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:37 PM Subject: Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches Thanks Harsh for the info and Andrew

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

is the way to do this... There are also some patches that are completely mechanical and don't really require the involvement of YARN / HDFS committer, even if they change that project. For example, fixing a misspelling in the name of a hadoop-common API. Colin On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Yongjun

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

:34 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thank you all for the feedback. About how many digits to use, I personally find it's not annoying to type one extra digit, but as long as we have the rev number, it achieves the goal of identifying individual patch. About

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

unable to edit after a relogin. On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Allen, Andrew and Tsuyoshi. My wiki user name is YongjunZhang, I will appreciate it very much if someone can give me the permission to edit the wiki pages. Thanks. --Yongjun

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Hi, I wonder if anyone can help on resolving HADOOP-11320 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11320 to increase timeout for jenkins test of crossing-subproject patches? Thanks a lot, --Yongjun On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, Thank you

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Many thanks to Ted Yu, Steve Loughran and Andrew Wang for replying in the jira and Steve/Andrew for making the related changes! --Yongjun On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone can help on resolving HADOOP-11320 https

Re: submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Sorry my bad, I named Andrew Wang for Andrew Bayer in my last mail, both of them helped anyways:-) So thanks to all for the help on this matter! --Yongjun On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Many thanks to Ted Yu, Steve Loughran and Andrew Wang

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

for updating Wiki! Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Harsh, I just made a change in https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute#Naming_your_patch based on the discussion in this thread. --Yongjun

Re: a friendly suggestion for developers when uploading patches

. Doesn't mean we should change the order though. I don't think that is something you can do on a per-project basis, so take it to infrastructure@ On 14 December 2014 at 01:33, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi Konst, Thanks for the good suggestion

supportability JIRAs

Hi, When creating jira, there is a Labels entry where we could label the jira as supportability. It would help to do this, so we could possibly give priority to fix them for better supportability, especially for those JIRAs that tend to be small but very high-impact for end users. The types of

Re: about CHANGES.txt

building/using as changes.txt and release notes: https://github.com/aw-altiscale/hadoop-release-metadata I try to update these every day. :) On Mar 13, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Esteban, I assume this report gets info purely from the jira database

Re: about CHANGES.txt

. Colin On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi Allen, Thanks a lot for your input! Looks like problem a, c, d you listed is not too bad, assuming we can solve d by pulling this info from jira as Sean pointed out. Problem b (branch

Re: about CHANGES.txt

, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Thanks Ravi and Colin for the feedback. Hi Allen, You pointed out that git log has problem when dealing with branch that has merges, would you please elaborate the problem? Thanks. --Yongjun On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Colin

Re: Save the Date: Apache Hadoop Bug Bash / May 8th!

Great idea Allen, big +1! Thanks. --Yongjun On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote: Hi Allen, Thank you for the great suggestion. Let's do this! Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Allen Wittenauer a...@altiscale.com wrote: Hi

Re: about CHANGES.txt

Thanks Sean, that'd be even better! --Yongjun On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: So long as you include the issue number, you can automate pulling the type from jira directly instead of putting it in the message. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Yongjun

Re: about CHANGES.txt

, you can automate pulling the type from jira directly instead of putting it in the message. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi, I found that changing CHANGES.txt when committing a jira is error prone because of the different sections

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

Thanks Andrew for the proposal. +1, and I will be happy to help. --Yongjun On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andrew Wang andrew.w...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi devs, It's been a year and a half since 2.x went GA, and I think we're about due for a 3.x release. Notably, there are two

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

Thanks all. There is an open issue HDFS-6962 (ACLs inheritance conflicts with umaskmode), for which the incompatibility appears to make it not suitable for 2.x and it's targetted 3.0, please see:

Re: 2.7 status

Hi, Thanks for working on 2.7 release. Currently the fallback from KerberosAuthenticator to PseudoAuthenticator is enabled by default in a hardcoded way. HAOOP-10895 changes the default and requires applications (such as oozie) to set a config property or call an API to enable the fallback.

Re: REMINDER! REGISTRATIONS CLOSING 5/6!

Thanks Allen a lot for organizing the Haoop Bug Bash, very happy to see many folks by face! Wish you all a nice weekend! --Yongjun On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Allen Wittenauer a...@altiscale.com wrote: On May 5, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Allen Wittenauer a...@altiscale.com wrote:

set up jenkins test for branch-2

Hi, We touched this topic before but it was put on hold. I'd like to bring it to our attention again. From time to time we saw changes that work fine in trunk but not branch-2, and we don't catch the issue in a timely manner. The difference between trunk and branch-2 is sufficient to justify

Re: set up jenkins test for branch-2

on quality. Thanks. --Yongjun On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Allen Wittenauer a...@altiscale.com wrote: On Jun 14, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Yongjun Zhang yzh...@cloudera.com wrote: From time to time we saw changes that work fine in trunk but not branch-2, and we don't catch the issue in a timely

Re: [UPDATE] New ASF git policy on force-pushes / Tags / Stale branches

Thanks Vinod and Akira.. I assume we will have at least a committer review of any force-push. Say, if the commit history already has x, y, z, now we need to force push with x', we'd better not torget y and z, and if there is conflict putting in y and z after x', the conflict is better reviewed.

Re: [UPDATE] New ASF git policy on force-pushes / Tags / Stale branches

citly marked so, are > good enough for handling them IMO. > > Thanks > +Vinod > > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 8:07 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > I assume we will have at least a committer review of any force-push. Say, > > if the commit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

Thanks Junping and Allen. It'd be nice to have HDFS-9629 but I'm ok with option 2, given the fact that the issue is not critical (and will be addressed in all future releases), and the concern Allen raised. Best, --Yongjun On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Allen Wittenauer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

Thanks Junping again for working on this release. +1 (binding), - Downloaded source tarball and binary tarball - Verified signature and checksum for both source and binary tarballs - Compiled and built a single node cluster - Run HDFS shell commands to create files - Run distcp job between this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.4 RC0

Hi Junping, Thanks a lot for leading the effort on 2.6.4. We were discussing in HDFS-9629, and have agreement on adding an additional step in the release process to update the year in the webui footer. See

Re: Looking to a Hadoop 3 release

Thanks Andrew for initiating the effort! +1 on pushing 3.x with extended alpha cycle, and continuing the more stable 2.x releases. --Yongjun On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > Hi Kai, > > Sure, I'm open to it. It's a new major release, so we're

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0-alpha2 RC0

Thanks Andrew much for the work here! +1 (binding). - Downloaded both binary and src tarballs - Verified md5 checksum and signature for both - Built from source tarball - Deployed 2 pseudo clusters, one with the released tarball and the other with what I built from source, and did the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.5 (RC1)

Hi Sangjin, Thanks a lot for your work here. My +1 (binding). - Downloaded both binary and src tarballs - Verified md5 checksum and signature for both - Build from source tarball - Deployed 2 pseudo clusters, one with the released tarball and the other with what I built from source, and did the

Jenkins test failure

Hi, I saw quite a few jenkins test failure for patches uploaded to jira, For example, https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/12347/console apache-yetus-2971eff/yetus-project/pom.xml Modes: Sentinel MultiJDK Jenkins Robot Docker ResetRepo UnitTests Processing: HADOOP-14407

Re: Jenkins test failure

o attach the patch again. > > Regards, > Akira > > On 2017/05/17 18:38, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I saw quite a few jenkins test failure for patches uploaded to jira, >> >> For example, >> https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/1234

Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

Hi All, > We have released Apache Hadoop 3.0.2 in April of this year [1]. Since then, there are quite some commits done to branch-3.0. To further improve the quality of release, we plan to do 3.0.3 release now. The focus of 3.0.3 will be fixing blockers (3), critical bugs (17) and bug fixes

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

> > My 2 cents... > Thanks, > -Eric Payne > > > > > > On Monday, May 7, 2018, 12:09:00 AM CDT, Yongjun Zhang < > yjzhan...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > We have released Apache Hadoop 3.0.2 in April of

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

oint releasing any more 3.0.x releases if >> downstream projects can't pick it up (after the fact that HBase is one of >> the most important projects around Hadoop). >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com> >> wrote: >> >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 2.9.1 Release

d improvements in 2.9.1 release, please > refer to CHANGES [2] and RELEASENOTES [3]. > - For download, please got to download page[4] > > Thank you all for contributing to the Apache Hadoop 2.9.1. > > > Last, thanks Yongjun Zhang, Junping Du, Andrew Wang and Chris Douglas for >

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

including the YARN-7190 patch in 3.0.3 release. This is a fix that > will enable HBase to use Hadoop 3.0.x in the production line. > > thanks > Vrushali > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks Wei-C

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

if thebranch is cut > too early. > > Echoing Eric Payne, I think we should wait to cut the branch until we are > actually creating the RC to vote on (i.e. on May 29 or 30 if the vote is to > be on May 30). > > Eric > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Yon

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

Hello, PMC votes are needed for release, can I get some help from PMCs? Really appreciate it! --Yongjun On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > Thank you all very much for the testing, feedback and discussion! > > I was able to build outside docker, by following

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

Verified that various queue config properties for CS are refreshable > - Verified streaming jobs work as expected > - Verified that user weights work as expected > - Verified that FairOrderingPolicy in a CS queue will evenly assign > resources > - Verified running yarn shell applicatio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

resume the build with the > command > [ERROR] mvn -rf :hadoop-shim > > Not seeing the artifact published here as well. > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.hadoop/hadoop-project > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Yongjun Zhang > wrote: > >> Thanks Eri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

buted HDFS with KMS >>- Ran basic hdfs commands with encryption >>- Sanity checked webui and logs >> >> >> >> -Xiao >> >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula < >> brahmareddy.batt...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

Thank you all very much for the testing, feedback and discussion! I was able to build outside docker, by following the steps Nanda described, I saw the same problem; then I tried 3.0.2 released a while back, it has the same issue. As Allen pointed out, it seems the steps to build site are not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

BTW, thanks Allen and Steve for discussing and suggestion about the site build problem I hit earlier, I did the following step mvn install -DskipTests before doing the steps Nanda listed helped to solve the problems. --Yongjun On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > Th

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

Hi All, I will be working on cutting the 3.0.3 branch and trying a build today. Thanks. --Yongjun On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Thanks Eric. Sounds good. I may try to see if I can do the branching/RC > sooner. > > --Yongjun

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

Wang, Eddy Xu who helped when I tried to solve the build issues. At this point, please be aware of the existence of branch-3.0, branch-3.0.3. Best, --Yongjun On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > HI, > > I did build before cut branch and hit some issues, hav

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

Sorry, forgot to mention Junping Du, who also helped me a lot. Many thanks Junping! Thanks. --Yongjun On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > The build issues are all solved, and I have cut the 3.0.3 branch and close > to get a build out. Since it's tak

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Yongjun On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > The build issues are all solved, and I have cut the 3.0.3 branch and close > to get a build out. Since it's taking me a bit more time (I expect to send > vote invitation email by

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 Release plan

HI, I did build before cut branch and hit some issues, have not got to the bottom, will cut branch after the build issues are resolved. Thanks. --Yongjun On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yjzhan...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I will be working on cutting t

[VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

Greetings all, I've created the first release candidate (RC0) for Apache Hadoop 3.0.3. This is our next maintenance release to follow up 3.0.2. It includes about 249 important fixes and improvements, among which there are 8 blockers. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343997 The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

te: > >> Sorry, I forgot to write my vote in the last message. >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Regards, >> Takanobu >> >> > -Original Message----- >> > From: Takanobu Asanuma [mailto:tasan...@yahoo-corp.jp] >> > Sent: Wednesday, J

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343997 > > Even after logging in, I am not able to see any jiras. > It says "The requested filter doesn't exist or is private." > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Yongjun Zhang > wrote: > >> Thanks for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

te. I can't see the >> blocker list. >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343997 >> >> Meanwhile , I will be working on testing the release. >> >> Thanks >> Shashi >> On 6/1/18, 11:18 AM, "Yongjun Zhang" wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

work as expected > - Verified that user weights work as expected > - Verified that FairOrderingPolicy in a CS queue will evenly assign > resources > - Verified running yarn shell application runs as expected > > > > > > > > On Friday, June 1, 2018, 12:48

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

t; - basic sanity check of NN, RM UI > > > > Thanks, > > Ajay > > > > On 6/2/18, 12:45 AM, "Shashikant Banerjee" < > sbaner...@hortonworks.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Yongjun, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

Hi Gabor, I got the git tag in, it's release-3.0.3-RC0. Would you please give it a try? It should correspond to commit 37fd7d752db73d984dc31e0cdfd590d252f5e075 Author: Yongjun Zhang Date: Wed May 30 00:07:33 2018 -0700 Update version to 3.0.3 to prepare for 3.0.3 release Thanks

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 GA is released

Congratulations Andrew and all, a great milestone! Thanks Andrew for driving it! --Yongjun On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Jonathan Kelly wrote: > Thanks, Andrew! > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:54 PM Andrew Wang > wrote: > > > Thanks for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

p.apache.org/releases.html page. > > I just did it, FYI: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision= > 1837967 > > Thanks > +Vinod > > > On May 31, 2018, at 10:48 PM, Yongjun Zhang wrote: > > Greetings all, > > I've created the first release candidate (RC0) for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

gjun On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Jonathan Eagles wrote: > Thank you, Yongjun Zhang for resolving this issue for me. I have verified > the 3.0.3 build is now working for me for tez to specify as a hadoop > dependency. > > As for release procedure, can someone comment on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.3 (RC0)

today and now 2.9.1 is pushed to the mvn repo. >> >> You can double check it. I suspect sometimes Nexus may fail to notify >> user when this is unexpected failures. >> >> >> >> >> >> Bests, >> >> Sammi >> >> *From:* Yongj

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-12943 branch to trunk - Consistent Reads from Standby

ck into the call queue. That's > > completely unacceptable. A buggy or malicious client can easily cause > > livelock in the IPC layer with handlers only looping on calls that never > > satisfy the condition. Why is this not implemented via > RetriableExceptions? > > >

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-12943 branch to trunk - Consistent Reads from Standby

Great work guys. Wonder if we can elaborate what's impact of not having #2 fixed, and why #2 is not needed for the feature to complete? 2. Need to fix automatic failover with ZKFC. Currently it does not doesn't know about ObserverNodes trying to convert them to SBNs. Thanks. --Yongjun On Wed,

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10250) VersionUtil returns wrong value when comparing two versions

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-10250: -- Summary: VersionUtil returns wrong value when comparing two versions Key: HADOOP-10250 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10250 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10293) Though symlink is disabled by default, related code interprets path to be link incorrectly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yongjun Zhang resolved HADOOP-10293. Resolution: Fixed See commit log for Addendum patch for HADOOP-9652 to fix performance

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10543) RemoteException's unwrapRemoteException method failed for PathIOException

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-10543: -- Summary: RemoteException's unwrapRemoteException method failed for PathIOException Key: HADOOP-10543 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10543

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10510) TestSymlinkLocalFSFileContext tests are failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yongjun Zhang resolved HADOOP-10510. Resolution: Duplicate I'm marking this as a duplicate per [~andrew.wang]'s comments

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10872) org.apache.hadoop.fs.shell.TestPathData failed intermittently with Mkdirs failed to create d1

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-10872: -- Summary: org.apache.hadoop.fs.shell.TestPathData failed intermittently with Mkdirs failed to create d1 Key: HADOOP-10872 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10888) org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPC.testRetryProxy failed often with timeout

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-10888: -- Summary: org.apache.hadoop.ipc.TestIPC.testRetryProxy failed often with timeout Key: HADOOP-10888 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10888 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10889) Fix misuse of test.build.data in various places

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-10889: -- Summary: Fix misuse of test.build.data in various places Key: HADOOP-10889 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10889 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11045) Introducing a tool to detect flaky tests of hadoop jenkins test job

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11045: -- Summary: Introducing a tool to detect flaky tests of hadoop jenkins test job Key: HADOOP-11045 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11045 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11056) OsSecureRandom.setConf() might leak resource

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11056: -- Summary: OsSecureRandom.setConf() might leak resource Key: HADOOP-11056 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11056 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11189) TestDNFencing.testQueueingWithAppend failed often in latest test

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11189: -- Summary: TestDNFencing.testQueueingWithAppend failed often in latest test Key: HADOOP-11189 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11189 Project

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-11189) TestDNFencing.testQueueingWithAppend failed often in latest test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yongjun Zhang resolved HADOOP-11189. Resolution: Duplicate TestDNFencing.testQueueingWithAppend failed often in latest test

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11195) Move Id-Name mapping in NFS to the hadoop-common area for better maintenance

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11195: -- Summary: Move Id-Name mapping in NFS to the hadoop-common area for better maintenance Key: HADOOP-11195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11195

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11208) Replace daemon with better name in scripts like hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/bin/hdfs

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11208: -- Summary: Replace daemon with better name in scripts like hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/bin/hdfs Key: HADOOP-11208 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11293) Factor OSType out from Shell

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11293: -- Summary: Factor OSType out from Shell Key: HADOOP-11293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11293 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-11320) Submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run

Yongjun Zhang created HADOOP-11320: -- Summary: Submitting a hadoop patch doesn't trigger jenkins test run Key: HADOOP-11320 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11320 Project: Hadoop

  1   2   >