On 15.07.2005, at 17:30, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Upayavira:
Just in case anyone has time on their hands at Stuttgart, this
might be
interesting for you.
Can someone post this to the wiki.apache.org/apachecon/
please? :-)
I've added it to
On 26.04.2005, at 19:48, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Here's a brilliant idea! I'd love to find a wiki that also supports
updates via some sort of geek-oriented interface, like CVS or SVN.
That way, we could please both the millions of folks who like using
the web - and can usually figure out how to
This forum is probably more applicable for these kinds of offers:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Breidenbach jeff (at) jab.org
Date: 16. Dezember 2004 09:16:49 MEZ
Subject: Apache / mail-archive.com
...
Also I noticed Apache lists are using our service pretty heavily.
That's great - please
On 21.12.2004, at 21:15, robert burrell donkin wrote:
by this time next year, software patent violations are most likely to
be enforceable by criminal sanction. any company wanted to maliciously
damage an open source project would only have to target individual
european release managers using
On 06.07.2004, at 21:03, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
We don't appear to, but I would be +1 on setting something like this
up. Freebsd.org has one, not sure who else might.
mod_perl has one: http://perl.apache.org/jobs/jobs.html
Though I suppose an ASF-wide list would be a GoodThing (TM)...
Cheers,
On 11.03.2004, at 15:36, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
It appears that the product in question includes a copy of the Apache
license in their documentation. Does this give them the right to
rename packages an appropriate the software?
My understanding is that the Apache license allows this.
Yes, together with
On 11.02.2004, at 04:10, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
With great sadness, I must report the staggering loss of our good
friend and colleague, Martin Pöschl [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Details
are sketchy, but it's been confirmed that Martin passed away on
January 29th, 2004. Martin lived in Vienna, Austria.
I'm
On 30/10/2003, at 09:44, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
And here is yet another version.
http://www.cocooncenter.org/apache/coins-04.png
-- Andreas
Great, great, great! I'd really like to see Fitz' blackjack
theme on the breast (small) and one of the bandit+coins
designs on the back (biiig). Though, I
On 29/10/2003, at 12:35, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Hi Apache community,
here are two drafts of a logo:
http://www.cocooncenter.org/apache/apache-foundation.png
http://www.cocooncenter.org/apache/apachecon.png
Hmmm, there is *a* feather but not *the* feather!
*bummer* ;-0
Cheers,
Erik
On 20/10/2003, at 01:40, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The original intention of the newsletter was Newsletter
will be one of the *glue* of the communities in the ASF
umbrella
... It seems that the newsletter itself is going to the contrary.
The newsletter is doing that job. All that was asked is that
As the discussion now shows *nobody* is in favour of Tetsuyas
resignation
and *everybody* appreciate[sd] his efforts but it also seems that there
exist some basic misunderstandings, at least I've lost the point
somewhere
last night...
On 20/10/2003, at 10:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
And
On 20/10/2003, at 04:43, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well, the threads on this and other similar topics showed that the
majority
of our community has a completely different point of view when it
comes
to information reception.
Compared to whom? To you, me or Tetsuyo?
EVERYBODY HAS HIS/HER OWN
On 20/10/2003, at 04:44, Rob Oxspring wrote:
we know that everybody has
his/her own preferences
Again I would have thought that most of us are grown up enough to
realise
that.
Therefore I wrote '... we [the ASF community] know ...' :)
so why don't we just go with a pull-model instead of
pushing
Looks like Verisign plans to revive its SiteFinder 'service':
http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5092133.html
Bah.
Cheers,
Erik
Btw, the complete presentation given by Verisign at the ICANN
SECSAC meeting on 15th Oct. is available here:
http://www.icann.org/presentations/turner-secsac-dc-15oct03.ppt
On 13/10/2003, at 01:47, Shane Curcuru wrote:
...
Also I know Ben Laurie has other nifty key management/who knows who
tools
just to throw in a URL for KeyMan:
http://keyman.aldigital.co.uk/
there's even a doc with 'Instructions for ASF Keysigning':
http://keyman.aldigital.co.uk/asf.html
Wiki has
On 24/09/2003, at 05:03, Steven Noels wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
arghhh, without comments:
'EU Parliament Approves Software Patents'
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/24/
1253227.shtml?tid=155tid=185tid=99
Don't panic:
No panic involved ;) just passing on a pointer, so that everybody can
form
forwared without comment from board@, as a follow-up on the recent
discussion about announce@
Cheers,
Erik
Begin forwarded message:
Von: Christopher A Bongaarts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Do, 4. Sep 2003 19:25:52 Europe/Berlin
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [ANN] Jakarta Turbine 2.3 released
On 26/08/2003, at 07:44, Danny Angus wrote:
If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to
opposing
software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo.
d.
+1 and +1!
just FYI: the ISOC members are currently discussing the same issues but
it's probably also
On 16/08/2003, at 11:58, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
When I originally proposed the announce@apache.org list, the purpose
was
this: Each project would send their announcements to their own list
(eg.
announce@httpd.apache.org) AND send a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That
way people
On 11/07/2003, at 05:33, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1) the ASF publishes a newsletter (following the very nice style used
in the recent Jakarta one) that covers all the ASF endevours. Including
infrastructure, licensing, security, incubation and all the
non-so-project stuff.
2) the newsletter is
On 03/07/2003, at 06:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is this list archived?
There are archives at MARC and gmane.org
And the ASF archives site: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/
uuups, yes. After all the 'eyebrowse down' mails, coming up on
infrastructure every now and then, I didn't even think
[I'm crossposting this to community@ and party@ to catch some more eyes;
please reply on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
some time ago we already had a discussion about a possible ASF meeting
here in Germany. We also started to collect the locations of the
interested people (see
...so that gmane.org finally picks up the list...
Cheers,
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danny Angus wrote:
Steffano,
You asked..
Now, I'm asking: what if the ASF provides its own news server
snip
Of course, it should be transparent and allow to redirect back a
newsgroup post to the mail list
I seem to remember Pier trying this with his own equipment.
I believe that it was such a
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
I have often thought it would be very very nice if the source files
could reference the license, and tell you where to get it, rather than
including the full text. This hugely increases the size of everything,
and provides no real benefit. If
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Erik Abele wrote:
so we get 808,9kb for the source files plus the license
(22998/1024=22,5kb) itself: ~ 831,4kb
hehe, really cute compared to 6,7M :-
That's not nearly as fun!
Anyway, 831kb are also way to much for just the license text, but 6,7mb
would
Dion,
can you please use the newly created [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (thanks,
Sam) for this sort of topics?
Thanks and cheers,
Erik
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm in a just do it kind of mood.
I just created a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Noel is the initial moderator.
If/when there is an
As far as I understand it, the license itself isn't compatible to be
referenced from another file. It's quite 'direct' and always relates to
the document it is in. IANAL but I think we would need another phrase in
the license wich states something like the following:
This license applies to
Ask Bjoern Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated the committers / projects list:
http://cvs.apache.org/~ask/
http://cvs.apache.org/~ask/people.html
http://cvs.apache.org/~ask/committers.html
- ask
great, but wouldn't it make more sense to update this info regularly
(weekly,
robert burrell donkin wrote:
(i'm not really sure where comments about the main foundation site
should be posted or how to submit patches. hopefully someone will
correct me if this isn't the right place.)
Since site-dev@ was removed, infrastructure@ is the place to go.
Attached also the missing
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
so, I wonder, should I go down the path of 'incubation'?, should I
move it under the committers/ CVS? or in the community CVS? move it
on sourceforge? should we clutter this mail list
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
personally, i think that if more than about three hands go up on
this list that would be a sufficient nuclear community for agora
to go directly into the commons. fewer than three people plus
stefano, and i think it should go the the incubator.
mho.
ahh,
Thanks for the reminder to Eric Raymond's changes :)
Just grep'ed httpd-*, site, site-tools, apr-*, incubator-*, asf-site, commons-*
and found only 3 incorrect links.
In any event, I'm wondering about the systematic issue.
Do you think about a general link-checker installed on daedalus? Hmmm, is
of
the Jakarta world :-(
Something like one of those could be batched from time to time, and the
report mailed to the appropriate list.
As said above, would be handy to have such a tool; just go for it ;-)
cheers,
Erik
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Joshua,
in case you are interested in the vote, see below...
As far as I can recall the list was pretty busy at this time and some people worried
about the signal-to-noise ratio while thinking about 650 Apache fellows plus users or as
you put it having a mechanism to quite people who make
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
For those of us that are not on infrastructure@, what's the summary thus
far? Is it just the obvious which can be gleaned from the above, ie Andy
proposed blog software installed on an apache.org machine and someone
-1'ed it, or was it
I'm also +1 on community.apache.org and the redirects, but I'm quite
unsure if we really should place such preconditions on all the
committers. We certainly have to establish some basic 'rules' or may be
only strong suggestions as Andy stated. however, IMO the requirements
should be preferably
Hi Henning,
yeah, Munich or any other big city in the southern german area would be
great.
btw, what about a 'german division meeting'. I'm from Aalen (100km east of
Stuttgart, 200km north of Munich) and would like to meet some other Apache
fellows from germany...perhaps we can arrange
VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
this mail list thru a web archive?
[ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
[ ] 0 don't know/don't care
[X] -1 no, let's keep it private
- o -
VOTE 2: would you like to make it possible
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
* On 2002-10-25 at 22:53,
Erik Abele [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say:
Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different
developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings
did not really reach all the committers out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote:
From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are
subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different
developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's
41 matches
Mail list logo
