On 20.08.2005, at 20:05, Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
I'm not sure why PlanetApache is doing this but it insists on
displaying one of Ask's blogentries ('What's best for slides?
Black text on white background or white on black?') as the first
or
I'm not sure why PlanetApache is doing this but it insists on
displaying one of Ask's blogentries ('What's best for slides? Black
text on white background or white on black?') as the first or second
item on the list for weeks now...
This is slightly annoying so if somebody has a solution, I
On 15.07.2005, at 17:30, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Upayavira:
Just in case anyone has time on their hands at Stuttgart, this
might be
interesting for you.
Can someone post this to the wiki.apache.org/apachecon/
please? :-)
I've added it to http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/DayTr
On 26.04.2005, at 19:48, Shane Curcuru wrote:
Here's a brilliant idea! I'd love to find a wiki that also supports
updates via some sort of geek-oriented interface, like CVS or SVN.
That way, we could please both the millions of folks who like using
the web - and can usually figure out how to u
On 21.12.2004, at 21:15, robert burrell donkin wrote:
by this time next year, software patent violations are most likely to
be enforceable by criminal sanction. any company wanted to maliciously
damage an open source project would only have to target individual
european release managers using th
This forum is probably more applicable for these kinds of offers:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Breidenbach
Date: 16. Dezember 2004 09:16:49 MEZ
Subject: Apache / mail-archive.com
...
Also I noticed Apache lists are using our service pretty heavily.
That's great - please shout if you have cu
On 08.07.2004, at 05:48, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jul 7, 2004, at 6:01 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
suddenly i'll be at linuxworld, but i don't know if i can help out or
not.
Thanks for your offer, but we declined IDG's offer of the booth
space... I didn't get enough volunteers at the time to g
On 06.07.2004, at 21:03, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
We don't appear to, but I would be +1 on setting something like this
up. Freebsd.org has one, not sure who else might.
mod_perl has one: http://perl.apache.org/jobs/jobs.html
Though I suppose an ASF-wide list would be a GoodThing (TM)...
Cheers,
Eri
On 11.03.2004, at 18:33, Brian McCallister wrote:
I saw a link floating around a while back, but cannot find it now, to
a script to munge java sources from 1.1 to 2.0 license. Anyone have
that?
see cvs://committers/relicense :)
Cheers,
Erik
Thanks,
Brian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptograp
On 11.03.2004, at 15:36, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
It appears that the product in question includes a copy of the Apache
license in their documentation. Does this give them the right to
rename packages an appropriate the software?
My understanding is that the Apache license allows this.
Yes, together with
On 11.02.2004, at 04:10, Daniel L. Rall wrote:
With great sadness, I must report the staggering loss of our good
friend and colleague, Martin Pöschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Details
are sketchy, but it's been confirmed that Martin passed away on
January 29th, 2004. Martin lived in Vienna, Austria.
I'
On 02.12.2003, at 18:31, Sander Striker wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 18:26, Martin Cooper wrote:
I would recommend against using committers@, for two reasons. First,
AIUI
and based on previous reactions to messages to that list, this is not
the
kind of thing that list is intended for.
Correct. S
Just FYI but after all these discussions about signing keys
I stumbled over the following website:
http://www.biglumber.com/
It's primarily designed to help people sign each other's
PGP/GnuPG keys but it's also really useful when it comes
to arranging key-signing events. Just give it a look, ther
On 06.11.2003, at 00:46, Santiago Gala wrote:
Actually, I am exploring the concept, I expected some expert to come
out and say "Actually, project XYZ in sourceforge does a variant of
this, only much better" :-)
fwiw: there is a nice concept called Tripoli, see
http://www.pfir.org/tripoli-overvie
On 30/10/2003, at 09:44, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
And here is yet another version.
http://www.cocooncenter.org/apache/coins-04.png
-- Andreas
Great, great, great! I'd really like to see Fitz' blackjack
theme on the breast (small) and one of the bandit+coins
designs on the back (biiig). Though, I don
On 29/10/2003, at 12:35, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Hi Apache community,
here are two drafts of a logo:
http://www.cocooncenter.org/apache/apache-foundation.png
http://www.cocooncenter.org/apache/apachecon.png
Hmmm, there is *a* feather but not *the* feather!
*bummer* ;-0
Cheers,
Erik
I don't want to be an "enthusiasm blocker" but I have to agree with
what Justin already said. Tetsuya, do you think that the suggested
split-ups are reducing the amount of bureaucracy we already have in
ASF-land? If so, can you please be so kind and elaborate further on
this?
I'd be fine with
On 20/10/2003, at 04:44, Rob Oxspring wrote:
we know that everybody has
his/her own preferences
Again I would have thought that most of us are grown up enough to
realise
that.
Therefore I wrote '... we [the ASF community] know ...' :)
so why don't we just go with a pull-model instead of
pushing
th
On 20/10/2003, at 04:43, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well, the threads on this and other similar topics showed that the
majority
of our community has a completely different point of view when it
comes
to information reception.
Compared to whom? To you, me or Tetsuyo?
EVERYBODY HAS HIS/HER OWN PR
As the discussion now shows *nobody* is in favour of Tetsuyas
resignation
and *everybody* appreciate[sd] his efforts but it also seems that there
exist some basic misunderstandings, at least I've lost the point
somewhere
last night...
On 20/10/2003, at 10:44, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
And th
On 20/10/2003, at 01:40, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The original intention of the newsletter was "Newsletter
will be one of the *glue* of the communities in the ASF
umbrella
... It seems that the newsletter itself is going to the contrary.
The newsletter is doing that job. All that was asked is that
Looks like Verisign plans to revive its SiteFinder 'service':
http://news.com.com/2100-1038_3-5092133.html
Bah.
Cheers,
Erik
Btw, the complete presentation given by Verisign at the ICANN
SECSAC meeting on 15th Oct. is available here:
http://www.icann.org/presentations/turner-secsac-dc-15oct03.ppt
-
On 13/10/2003, at 01:47, Shane Curcuru wrote:
...
Also I know Ben Laurie has other nifty key management/who knows who
tools
just to throw in a URL for KeyMan:
http://keyman.aldigital.co.uk/
there's even a doc with 'Instructions for ASF Keysigning':
http://keyman.aldigital.co.uk/asf.html
Wiki has
With a bit help of Stefano I finally got around and finished a first
attempt
to visualize the Apache Web of Trust with the help of Agora.
Have a look at
http://apache.org/~erikabele/wot/wot.html
and let me know what you think.
The underlying datasets are available back to 1999 and are bas
On 24/09/2003, at 05:03, Steven Noels wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
arghhh, without comments:
'EU Parliament Approves Software Patents'
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/24/
1253227.shtml?tid=155&tid=185&tid=99
Don't panic:
No panic involved ;) just passing on a pointer, so that
arghhh, without comments:
'EU Parliament Approves Software Patents'
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/09/24/
1253227.shtml?tid=155&tid=185&tid=99
Cheers,
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
forwared without comment from board@, as a follow-up on the recent
discussion about announce@
Cheers,
Erik
Begin forwarded message:
Von: Christopher A Bongaarts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Datum: Do, 4. Sep 2003 19:25:52 Europe/Berlin
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [ANN] Jakarta Turbine 2.3 released (fw
On 27/08/2003, at 12:30, David Reid wrote:
This may well be too late for any form of decision, but I propose that
for
the duration of the 27th August 2003 we change the index page of the
main
ASF web site to point at a page that states our opposition to the
proposal
being voted on and our suppor
On 26/08/2003, at 10:22, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I predict that it will be really ugly. Fortunately, there are Open
Source
friendly companies like IBM, so with their patronage, Open Source can
succeed. Should they turn face, ugly will be an understatement.
Agreed, but did you know:
'As the world’
On 26/08/2003, at 07:44, Danny Angus wrote:
If anyone's counting a show of hands here I'm a European and +1 to
opposing
software patents in Europe and +1 to the ASF supporting the demo.
d.
+1 and +1!
just FYI: the ISOC members are currently discussing the same issues but
it's probably also too
On 16/08/2003, at 11:58, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
When I originally proposed the announce@apache.org list, the purpose
was
this: Each project would send their announcements to their own list
(eg.
announce@httpd.apache.org) AND send a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That
way people c
On 11/07/2003, at 05:33, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
1) the ASF publishes a newsletter (following the very nice style used
in the recent Jakarta one) that covers all the ASF endevours. Including
infrastructure, licensing, security, incubation and all the
non-so-project stuff.
2) the newsletter is se
On 03/07/2003, at 06:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is this list archived?
There are archives at MARC and gmane.org
And the ASF archives site: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/
uuups, yes. After all the 'eyebrowse down' mails, coming up on
infrastructure every now and then, I didn't even think about
On 03/07/2003, at 05:14, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Is this list archived? There was a post a few weeks ago with
committer stats that I wanted to save but can't locate it
any more.
There are archives at MARC and gmane.org:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-community&r=1&w=2
http://news.gmane.o
[I'm crossposting this to community@ and party@ to catch some more eyes;
please reply on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
some time ago we already had a discussion about a possible ASF meeting
here in Germany. We also started to collect the locations of the
interested people (see CVS:committers/docs/de-m
...so that gmane.org finally picks up the list...
Cheers,
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just FYI: I received the following note at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and confirmed the subscription request because I think it's a
GoodThing(tm) and it also complies with the list rules (public archives,
postings closed to committers).
If someone is interested in getting the current archives imported i
Danny Angus wrote:
Steffano,
You asked..
Now, I'm asking: what if the ASF provides its own news server
Of course, it should be transparent and allow to redirect back a
newsgroup post to the mail list
I seem to remember Pier trying this with his own equipment.
> I believe that it was such a sucess
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Erik Abele wrote:
>>
>>so we get 808,9kb for the source files plus the license
>>(22998/1024=22,5kb) itself: ~ 831,4kb
hehe, really cute compared to 6,7M :->
That's not nearly as fun!
Anyway, 831kb are also way to much for just t
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
I have often thought it would be very very nice if the source files
could reference the license, and tell you where to get it, rather than
including the full text. This hugely increases the size of everything,
and provides no real benefit. If
As far as I understand it, the license itself isn't compatible to be
referenced from another file. It's quite 'direct' and always relates to
the document it is in. IANAL but I think we would need another phrase in
the license wich states something like the following:
"This license applies to an
Dion,
can you please use the newly created [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (thanks,
Sam) for this sort of topics?
Thanks and cheers,
Erik
Sam Ruby wrote:
I'm in a "just do it" kind of mood.
I just created a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Noel is the initial moderator.
If/when there is an infrastr
David Crossley wrote:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Now I've noticed quite a few folks falling off the shore, and into a
nearby rivers and canals. Which unless you are living on a boad - is
propably not quite correct. So I'd love to know if that is projection
issue; or a true issue with the location
Really, really great! just about 15 meters off target...(middle/south germany).
muchas gracias, the map rocks!
cheers,
Erik
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
The map on:
http://cvs.apache.org/~dirkx/sgala.html
has had a wee enhancement; if you zoom in far enough; the boring digital
terrain map o
Ask Bjoern Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I updated the committers / projects list:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/~ask/
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/~ask/people.html
> http://cvs.apache.org/~ask/committers.html
>
>
> - ask
>
great, but wouldn't it make more sense to update this info regular
robert burrell donkin wrote:
(i'm not really sure where comments about the main foundation site
should be posted or how to submit patches. hopefully someone will
correct me if this isn't the right place.)
Since site-dev@ was removed, infrastructure@ is the place to go.
Attached also the missing p
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> personally, i think that if more than about three hands go up on
> this list that would be a sufficient nuclear community for agora
> to go directly into the commons. fewer than three people plus
> stefano, and i think it should go the the incubator.
>
> mho.
ahh,
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
so, I wonder, should I go down the path of 'incubation'?, should I
move it under the committers/ CVS? or in the community CVS? move it
on sourceforge? should we clutter this mail list o
don't know every project of
the Jakarta world :-(
Something like one of those could be batched from time to time, and the
report mailed to the appropriate list.
As said above, would be handy to have such a tool; just go for it ;-)
cheers,
Erik
--- Noel
-----Original Message-
From: Erik
Thanks for the reminder to Eric Raymond's changes :)
Just grep'ed httpd-*, site, site-tools, apr-*, incubator-*, asf-site, commons-*
and found only 3 incorrect links.
In any event, I'm wondering about the systematic issue.
Do you think about a general link-checker installed on daedalus? Hmmm, is
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I believe Ken has a shop for that stuff already (thought I found the shop
via his site at least)
http://apache-server.com/store.html
http://www.copyleft.net/search.phtml?search=1&lookup[brand_id]=52
cheers,
erik
Mvgr,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: O'brien, Tim
O'brien, Tim wrote:
I have no idea of what the discussion is at community@, I'm not allowed to
subscribe to that list.
I just manually moderated Tim's mails through to communtiy@ and if nobody
objects I will subscribe him too. I think we had enough positive feedback for
this...
cheers,
Erik
Again
Hi Joshua,
in case you are interested in the vote, see below...
As far as I can recall the list was pretty busy at this time and some people worried
about the signal-to-noise ratio while thinking about 650 Apache fellows plus users or as
you put it "having a mechanism to quite people who make noi
Rich Bowen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
For those of us that are not on infrastructure@, what's the summary thus
far? Is it just the obvious which can be gleaned from the above, ie Andy
proposed blog software installed on an apache.org machine and someone
-1'ed it, or was it m
+1, very, very well said...
After having read all the different concerns and opinions in the previous
posts, I completely agree to every single point of your mail and I hope this
will bring us back on the right trackthank you, Mr. Curcuru ;-)
cheers,
erik
> Von: Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTEC
I'm also +1 on community.apache.org and the redirects, but I'm quite
unsure if we really should place such preconditions on all the
committers. We certainly have to establish some basic 'rules' or may be
only strong suggestions as Andy stated. however, IMO the requirements
should be preferably
Yes, definetely +1. I will take this over to the party@ list.
btw, I will try to capture all the postings about this topic to get a
file with all interested europe/german (?) people together. more to come
on party@ ...
Erik
David Reid wrote:
You know guys - party@ is probably a better place to d
Hi Henning,
yeah, Munich or any other big city in the southern german area would be
great.
btw, what about a 'german division meeting'. I'm from Aalen (100km east of
Stuttgart, 200km north of Munich) and would like to meet some other Apache
fellows from germany...perhaps we can arrange something.
> VOTE 1: would you like to make it possible for non-committers to read
> this mail list thru a web archive?
>
> [ ] +1 yes, let's make it readable
> [ ] 0 don't know/don't care
> [X] -1 no, let's keep it private
>
>
>- o -
>
>
> VOTE 2: would you like to make
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
* On 2002-10-25 at 22:53,
Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different
developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings
did not really reach all th
> [ ] View 1: Open the list completely, anyone can subscribe, post
and read
> the archive
> [ X ] View 2: Keep the list open only to committers, members and
invitees
> (highly contributive developers and users) so far as posting goes,
> however allow anyone to read or view th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Erik Abele wrote:
From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are
subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different
developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg&#
From a moderators POV I can say, that mostly the people which are
subscribed to reorg@ have also joined [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps we should propose another posting on the different
developer-/committer-lists? It seems that Greg's and Stefano's postings
did not really reach all the committers ou
63 matches
Mail list logo
