[computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Ben Lambrechts
If my program has to wait to long before it gets a game, the console don't send commands to my program. I tried all I could think about: I used the tclkit from Equi4 and tried ActiveTcl. I tried to create a .bat file and run it in the normal console and PowerShell. Can someone help with this

Re: [computer-go] mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread jonas . kahn
Congratulations to Mogo team! Twenty years from now, in ``a computer go history'' August 7th 2008: First victory of computer against pro with 9 handicap. By the way, the surge in strength with the 800 processors with respect to the quadcore (old) MogoBot, seemed relatively low, when comparing to

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
There really is a gap between a strong dan-level amateur and a pro player; pros routinely give large handicaps to amateurs to allow them a fair chance to win. Those of us who watched the game can say that there was a marked improvement in quality as Mogo was given more tine to work with. The

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
From: David Doshay [EMAIL PROTECTED] One point not discussed much in this thread is the consistency issue. I think that if Kim were able to play a dozen games against mogo with this same handicap he would win the last 6 ... people manage to adapt and the computers do not. But that much

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
That's a good way of putting it. AFAIK, Mogo has nothing comparable to the long-term memory of human players; each time it approaches a given joseki, it must recompute the right play from scratch. Aeons ago, I read a few papers by cognitive scientists at CMU - Newell and Simon, if memory

Re: [computer-go] mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
- Original Message I still have this theory that when the level of the program is in the high-dan reaches, it can take proper advantage of an opening book. Alas, it may be a few years before enough processoring power is routinely available to test this hypothesis. I know that we

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Don Dailey wrote: Much the same as in GO, where 10 -15 years ago the idea of Dan level play was so far off it was considered completely unattainable by pessimists, and even optimists viewed it as a century away. Where did you get that impression? I've recently spent some time reading the

[computer-go] I like pie.

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
- Original Message From: Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't care what people say about handicap systems, if you are the stronger player you must start from a dead lost position. Even though I'm not a strong GO player, common sense tells me that you will have to play unsound moves on

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
Don, Regarding usage of time and computers and blitz games: human players in blitz games tend to pick opening plays with good chances of success very rapidly from their repertoire. Mogo seems to recreate opening theory from scratch for every game; this makes it harder to win blitz games

Re: [computer-go] Report on 2008 US Go Congress Computer Go Tournament

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
Peter, many thanks to you and all the other participants in the Computer Go Tournament! It was fun watching and participating! Here's hoping we have a nice strong cluster or two mowing down the opposition next year! - Original Message From: Peter Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Computer

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
A Mac Pro with 8 cores is already feasible for any moderately well-heeled enthusiast; there are a few other lesser-known competitors. Which reminds me: the Cotsen tournament is coming up in late September. I'm not sure whether computers are allowed to play or not. If so, I'm fairly certain

Re: [computer-go] mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Vincent Diepeveen
Congrats to the MoGo team for getting system time at SARA for a match. The architecture of the power5/power6 system (2007 july a power5 system was installed and that has been updated to power6 now), is based upon having sufficient RAM and high bandwidth to i/o (for each Gflop a specific

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 03:49 -0700, terry mcintyre wrote: From: David Doshay [EMAIL PROTECTED] One point not discussed much in this thread is the consistency issue. I think that if Kim were able to play a dozen games against mogo with this same handicap he would win the last 6 ... people

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
Ben, I am having the same exact problem, so I don't think it's anything you are doing wrong. It seems to have something to do with idling a long time and it only seems to affect certain networks.On my own machine and internet connection it never happens. But I have access to a machine

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread John Fan
I also had a similar experience a couple of days ago. On one game, my bot generated the first move, but the opponent did not respond. So my bot was awarded with a win on time. Then my bot did not receive any new message from the server and it was assigned with a loss on time on the next game.

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Urban Hafner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don Dailey wrote: | Ben, | | I am having the same exact problem, so I don't think it's anything you | are doing wrong. It seems to have something to do with idling a long | time and it only seems to affect certain networks.On my own machine |

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Jason House
I hit this problem long ago when CGOS was young. The fix at that time was to send the estimated time until the next round. Eventually, that cluttered the logs and was removed from the server code. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 9, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben, I

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 12:21 +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote: Don Dailey wrote: Much the same as in GO, where 10 -15 years ago the idea of Dan level play was so far off it was considered completely unattainable by pessimists, and even optimists viewed it as a century away. Where did you

RE: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread David Fotland
Unfortunately the Cotsen conflicts with the Taizhou tournament this year. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:computer-go- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of terry mcintyre Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:47 AM To: computer go Subject: Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 10:42 -0400, Jason House wrote: I hit this problem long ago when CGOS was young. The fix at that time was to send the estimated time until the next round. Eventually, that cluttered the logs and was removed from the server code. So sending an occasional informational

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 10:42 -0400, Jason House wrote: I hit this problem long ago when CGOS was young. The fix at that time was to send the estimated time until the next round. Eventually, that cluttered the logs and was removed from the server code. Wait a minute ...Did you start

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Ian Osgood
On Aug 9, 2008, at 8:30 AM, David Fotland wrote: Unfortunately the Cotsen conflicts with the Taizhou tournament this year. David Could you share some more details about this tournament? Ian ___ computer-go mailing list

RE: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread David Fotland
2008 TaiZhou Computer Go Championship 1. The number of participating countries and regions: 20 countries and regions, including China and the China Taipei. In accordance with the relevant provisions of BOCOG, The participating teams and all staff from China Taiwan use Chinese Taipei title. 2. The

[computer-go] Re: CGOS thinks I'm still loggedd on

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 08:58 -0700, David Fotland wrote: What's the server timeout for logon? A bot crashed yesterday, and I still can't log on. The server says I'm already logged on. mfgo12-level-0 on the 19x19 server. There is no time-out. The server logs show that mfgo12-level-0 just

Re: [computer-go] mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Ian Osgood
On Aug 9, 2008, at 4:16 AM, terry mcintyre wrote: - Original Message I still have this theory that when the level of the program is in the high-dan reaches, it can take proper advantage of an opening book. Alas, it may be a few years before enough processoring power is

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
I am looking at this page: http://cryp.to/publications/masquerading-idle-connections/ and wondering if it's relevant. It seems to describe the problem pretty well, talks about a 15 minute timeout which would do it and the timeout is built into the linux kernel but can be changed.

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Hideki Kato
Don, This problem can only be relevant to the routers built on Linux. If the server site uses Linux router(s) then this may be relevant. Servers and clients themselves are not relevant anyway. -Hideki Don Dailey: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am looking at this page:

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Don Dailey wrote: I am looking at this page: http://cryp.to/publications/masquerading-idle-connections/ and wondering if it's relevant. It seems to describe the problem pretty well, talks about a 15 minute timeout which would do it and the timeout is built into the linux kernel but can

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
I am putting the informational messages back into the server as a test to see if it stops this problem. If it does, this is at least a strong indication that log periods of inactivity triggers the problem. - Don On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 01:40 +0900, Hideki Kato wrote: Don, This problem can

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 17:43 +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote: Don Dailey wrote: I am looking at this page: http://cryp.to/publications/masquerading-idle-connections/ and wondering if it's relevant. It seems to describe the problem pretty well, talks about a 15 minute timeout which

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Hideki Kato
Oh, perhaps my brain is damaged :(. Just FYI, A few months ago, the same problem occured on 9x9 cgos. Only GNU Go clients eventualy hangged-up and others, including MoGo and FatMan-1, were working well. After observing while, I though long idle time after finishing games caused this (GNU Go

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Don Dailey wrote: Matthew Woodcraft wrote: Don Dailey wrote: Much the same as in GO, where 10 -15 years ago the idea of Dan level play was so far off it was considered completely unattainable by pessimists, and even optimists viewed it as a century away. Where did you get that impression?

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Jason House
Sent from my iPhone On Aug 9, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 10:42 -0400, Jason House wrote: I hit this problem long ago when CGOS was young. The fix at that time was to send the estimated time until the next round. Eventually, that cluttered

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Jason House
On Aug 9, 2008, at 11:46 AM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 10:42 -0400, Jason House wrote: I hit this problem long ago when CGOS was young. The fix at that time was to send the estimated time until the next round. Eventually, that cluttered the logs and was removed

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Ben Lambrechts
This seems to solve my problem. Many thanks, Ben On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Don Dailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-08-09 at 17:43 +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote: Don Dailey wrote: I am looking at this page: http://cryp.to/publications/masquerading-idle-connections/

Re: [computer-go] Strength of Monte-Carlo w/ UCT...

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
I'm curious what you guys think about the scalability of monte carlo with UCT. The MCTS technique appears to be extremely scalable. The theoretical papers about it claim that it scales up to perfect play in theory. My feeling is that as you scale up in power, certain things will improve

Re: [computer-go] cgos 19x19 has no anchor

2008-08-09 Thread Gunnar Farnebäck
Don Dailey wrote: Hi Markus, Run gnugo 3.7.10 using these exact options: ./gnugo --mode gtp --score aftermath --capture-all-dead --chinese-rules --min-level 10 --max-level 10 --positional-superko This should work fine but you might as well remove --score aftermath. It has no effect at all

Re: [computer-go] Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
Well, there you have it. The programs appear not to hang any longer since adding the informational messages back. So if you don't see any activity on the channel for about 2 minutes, you can be pretty sure the connection is broken.That may be used to externally monitor the process for

[computer-go] What's happening at the European Go Congress?

2008-08-09 Thread Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Hi all, there doesn't seem to be any news from the European Go Congress. Nevertheless, I see that partial results were posted: 19 x 19 Results 1st Crazy Stone 6/6 2nd Leela 5/6 3rd Many Faces of Go4/6 9 x 9 Results 1st Leela

Re: [computer-go] Strength of Monte-Carlo w/ UCT...

2008-08-09 Thread Vincent Diepeveen
On Aug 9, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Don Dailey wrote: I'm curious what you guys think about the scalability of monte carlo with UCT. The MCTS technique appears to be extremely scalable. The theoretical papers about it claim that it scales up to perfect play in theory. We agree here that this is

Re: [computer-go] Strength of Monte-Carlo w/ UCT...

2008-08-09 Thread Don Dailey
On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 01:59 +0200, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: On Aug 9, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Don Dailey wrote: I'm curious what you guys think about the scalability of monte carlo with UCT. The MCTS technique appears to be extremely scalable. The theoretical papers about it claim that it

Re: [computer-go] Strength of Monte-Carlo w/ UCT...

2008-08-09 Thread Christoph Birk
On Aug 9, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Don Dailey wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 01:59 +0200, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: On Aug 9, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Don Dailey wrote: I'm curious what you guys think about the scalability of monte carlo with UCT. The MCTS technique appears to be extremely scalable. The

[computer-go] Re: Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Dave Dyer
I'm really very weak on networking so I'm not sure what I'm actually reading or whether this fix needs to be applied on the server end or the client end. Any ideas is this is relevant? You also have the same problem, but with much less real information, if the client end end of the connection

[computer-go] Re: Program don't start playing on CGOS

2008-08-09 Thread Dave Dyer
I'm really very weak on networking so I'm not sure what I'm actually reading or whether this fix needs to be applied on the server end or the client end. Any ideas is this is relevant? You also have the same problem, but with much less real information, if the client end end of the connection

Re: [computer-go] Re: mogo beats pro!

2008-08-09 Thread terry mcintyre
I was present; David Doshay said that in ten years, it would be reasonable to expect computers to play even games with pros. Reporters tend to be a bit sloppy at times. In the Oregonian, David is reported as the author of Gnugo -- I've heard his spiel dozens of times, and he has never said