Re: [CGUYS] Win7 walk-through

2008-11-05 Thread Jeff Wright
 On the other hand, if W7 is working as well as you say, it strengthens the 
 suspicion that W7 is
 just Vista warmed over.

Um, even MS has said that Win7 isn't anything but a vastly improved
Vista.   That's kinda, sorta, ya know, why it looks like it.

We still patch, patch, patch.

By this standard, OS X is the one of the most insecure OSes available.
 Over the past year, not only has Apple been slower to patch OS X than
MS has been with Windows, there have been significantly more known
vulnerabilities.  Note the word known.  The black hat commnunity
isn't shy about slamming MS.

Do go on and on Thomas.  This Olberman-level of vein-pulsing attack
dog-ness fun to watch.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread betty
I opened the Mail folder in my Home library, and dragged the  
INBOX.imapmbox folder to the desktop. Mail created another one, and  
the ghost messages remain, and the Messages folder with in the Inbox  
folder is empty.

...snip...
2) You should never allow any antivirus program to mess with your email 
data. The data structure managed by your email program is complicated. 
Your antivirus program hacked at it with no knowledge of how these files 
are managed. It deleted the contents of a mail file, but may not have 
deleted the file itself and it certainly did not adjust the index file to 
match. So the email program's index is pointing to a file that is empty 
or not there. Hence a ghost file.


This is the best argument I've seen for avoiding Apple's Mail program--the data structure 
is complicated, as in OE. It's not so complicated in Mozilla's Thunderbird, so fewer 
things are likely to go wrong. I dumped Apple Mail ages ago after using it for only a 
couple of weeks. Went back and tried it again last week and dumped it again.


Have you backed up your email files this month? week? ever? Do you know where the 
preference/data files are located?


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Comcast internet speed question

2008-11-05 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
That is the one thing that disappoints me lately.  Sites that have 
not kept up. with the bandwidth.


Stewart


At 07:48 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote:
We have basic DSL. It's fast enough for viewing and downloading most 
files. For Netflix streaming movies, we have to wait for buffering 
about 15 minutes, then they play through. Three factors slow things down:


- old computer; using our new ones makes a big difference in speed 
for Flash videos
- bandwidth for servers where you're downloading larger files. 
Faster speed on your end won't make a difference there
- neighbors [cable only]; cable is like a party line with shared 
bandwidth. speed slows down as more neighbors are online. It was 
noticeable when we had cable. May or may not be noticeable for you.


Sure you'll like the faster speed, but I hate the outrageous price 
for higher speed. If I hadn't been places with 15-20Mbs service for 
$30 I wouldn't be so annoyed, but I can wait for more reasonable 
prices. For now, basic DSL is just fine. And it's not as fattening as dialup.


Betty


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
This is the best argument I've seen for avoiding Apple's Mail program--the 
data structure is complicated, as in OE. It's not so complicated in Mozilla's 
Thunderbird, so fewer things are likely to go wrong. I dumped Apple Mail ages
ago after using it for only a couple of weeks. Went back and tried it again
last week and dumped it again.

Not fair and not correct.

Thunderbird and Apple Mail do virtually the same thing in this regard. 
Thunderbird uses mbox format. Apple Mail uses emlx format. Emlx stores 
one message per file within folders and these files can be accessed via 
the Finder -- viewed directly using QuickView or a variety of other ways. 
Mbox has a number of variations, but typically stores one folder per 
file. Mbox files can be viewed in any text viewer. Both email programs 
maintain a separate index file.

Apple used to use mbox and still labels many files with an mbox 
extension, even though they are not mbox. I don't know why they do that. 
Perhaps they consider emlx to be just a further development of mbox? It 
is similar enough that one could argue for this.

I don't think the Apple Mail team possesses the sharpest pencils, but it 
is not a bad product. Thunderbird is better in some cases, but the 
feature sets are not identical. Either is a fine choice depending on 
circumstances.

Either mbox or emlx are in sharp contrast to what MS does: storing all 
emails in one huge, fragile database file that is constantly hit with 
changes and hard to back up (due to its potentially huge size and 
frequent changes).

I just spent 10 hours recovering 100s of lost messages from a 2.5 GB MS 
database file. It was a brutal job. I'm now looking at alternatives for 
my client.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Comcast internet speed question

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
Sure you'll like the faster speed, but I hate the outrageous price for 
higher speed. If I hadn't been places with 15-20Mbs service for $30 I
wouldn't be so annoyed, but I can wait for more reasonable prices.

Good point and prices will not come down if sheeps pay big bucks for what 
costs the provider almost nothing to provide.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

What version changed the way they do it?

I have simply gone into the right directory and restored mailboxes in 
Outlook with out a problem.


having sid that I do not use it and prefer Eudora, the old Eudora not 
the new one.


Stewart


At 09:11 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote:

Not fair and not correct.

Thunderbird and Apple Mail do virtually the same thing in this regard.
Thunderbird uses mbox format. Apple Mail uses emlx format. Emlx stores
one message per file within folders and these files can be accessed via
the Finder -- viewed directly using QuickView or a variety of other ways.
Mbox has a number of variations, but typically stores one folder per
file. Mbox files can be viewed in any text viewer. Both email programs
maintain a separate index file.

Apple used to use mbox and still labels many files with an mbox
extension, even though they are not mbox. I don't know why they do that.
Perhaps they consider emlx to be just a further development of mbox? It
is similar enough that one could argue for this.

I don't think the Apple Mail team possesses the sharpest pencils, but it
is not a bad product. Thunderbird is better in some cases, but the
feature sets are not identical. Either is a fine choice depending on
circumstances.

Either mbox or emlx are in sharp contrast to what MS does: storing all
emails in one huge, fragile database file that is constantly hit with
changes and hard to back up (due to its potentially huge size and
frequent changes).

I just spent 10 hours recovering 100s of lost messages from a 2.5 GB MS
database file. It was a brutal job. I'm now looking at alternatives for
my client.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] comcast internet speed question

2008-11-05 Thread rlsimon
I got the 768 option and can change it upward if I'm not satisfied ...the
price is too good! ...thanks for the good advice from everyone!

-Original Message-
From: Rev. Stewart Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: comcast internet speed question


Are you a big movie/music/content downloader

You will fine the speed difference a godsend.  However it all depends 
on what you use the net for.

We have the basic DSL setup at church.Just like what you got and 
I find it acceptable for what I do at church.  NO need for superfast 
super anything it is a business and we do not download big files and 
a lot of content.

At home I have a cable account that is 5 mps.  I tried to get the DSL 
6mps but they could not deliver on the speed.  ( a frequent complaint 
I hear around here.)  For what I do at home it is much more preferable.

Stewart


At 03:26 PM 11/4/2008, you wrote:
I ordered cable for the first time in my life.  I have had 
dialup...yeeech! I took the $25.95/mo 768kb (sorta like DSL) while my 
dialup usually gives me all of 23k (I want a 2mb file, I can make a 
sandwich and take a nap).  Am I gonna hate it or shuddi get the 
42.95/mo 6mb speed one ...on both they throw in the basic cable tv 
(ch2-23).  First price is forever more or less ...second price is for a 
year.  I can still change it since they won't install until thursday 
since the guy who came today said I need the heavy cable outside from 
pole to house which he doesn't carry so they hafta come tomorrow to put 
that in and then have the inside guy come back to do the 
rest...thoughts?

Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread rlsimon
If I buy a 1tb external usb drive, will it have the same 120gb limit due to
my motherboard or what?  If yes, then I would hafta divide it up into many
partitions?  My internal drive is a 160gb pata drive which had2 have 40gb
partitioned off to see it.  There's a 2nd hdd internal slot open ...if I
put the 1tb drive in there, what would hafta be done then, multiple
partitions?  Any other solutions?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Two solutions (really three)

1.) Partition it up into 120 GB partitions and have 8 120 and one 
smaller (maybe you will not get a full 1TB but maybe 960 GB)


2.) Use an overlay program which will allow your computer to see the 
full drive.


3.)  Buy a controller card that will allow you computer (It has it's 
own bios) to see the full drive.


The most radical fix is get a new motherboard.

Stewart


At 10:44 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote:

If I buy a 1tb external usb drive, will it have the same 120gb limit due to
my motherboard or what?  If yes, then I would hafta divide it up into many
partitions?  My internal drive is a 160gb pata drive which had2 have 40gb
partitioned off to see it.  There's a 2nd hdd internal slot open ...if I
put the 1tb drive in there, what would hafta be done then, multiple
partitions?  Any other solutions?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

One of the reasons I like the old Eudora (7.1)

Recently I had a major failure on my desktop system. I ran something 
stupid and it corrupted my C: drive.  Since I had recently upgraded 
my drives I still had my old drive handy.


Not having time to get to it, I got the old drive and attached it 
using an ID-USB cable to another system and copied the Email 
directory to that computer and ran my Eudora while I was working on 
the old system.


When I was done fixing my unit, I copied the directory back onto the 
drive preserving all email and folders etc. and ran it on the fixed 
system.  No email lost and no problems.


I always keep my email in a separate directory (Folders and all) on a 
data drive, not the C: drive.


Stewart


At 10:24 AM 11/5/2008, you wrote:

What version changed the way they do it?

I have simply gone into the right directory and restored mailboxes 
in Outlook with out a problem.


having sid that I do not use it and prefer Eudora, the old Eudora 
not the new one.


Stewart


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
If I buy a 1tb external usb drive, will it have the same 120gb limit due to
my motherboard or what?

No it will not. An external drive comes with its own disk controller in 
the drive's box. You are not using the controller on your motherboard so 
those limits do not apply. However, you OS may also place limits on 
addressability and those limits would apply.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] New Chip Technology Poses Threat to Homeland Securi

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
http://www.infopackets.com/news/government/2008/20081103_new_chip_technol
ogy_poses_threat_to_homeland_security.htm

Several months ago we had this discussion about the problems with RFID in 
passports. Looks like RSA Labs has now discovered what was obvious to us 
back then. Maybe RSA should be subscribing to the List?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
I have simply gone into the right directory and restored mailboxes in 
Outlook with out a problem.

Nobody mentioned Outlook and with so many flavors of Outlook out there I 
don't have a clue about which Outlook you are referring to.

Anyone want to clue us in to the formats various Outlooks use to store 
mailboxes.

On the Exchange server my understanding is that they use one humongous 
and fragile database file. No?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread John DeCarlo
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Tom Piwowar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If I buy a 1tb external usb drive, will it have the same 120gb limit due
 to
 my motherboard or what?

 No it will not. An external drive comes with its own disk controller in
 the drive's box. You are not using the controller on your motherboard so
 those limits do not apply. However, you OS may also place limits on
 addressability and those limits would apply.


In fact, I saw a recent article on this.  Infoworld or CNET or something.
The writer went back to his original XP disc to reinstall on the new 1 TB
drive.  Apparently, the original XP could not see anything bigger than 120GB
or so.  So he had to create a slipstreamed XP disk with SP 2 on it.

-- 
John DeCarlo, My Views Are My Own


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Alvin Auerbach

Thanks, David,

 I rebuilt the individual account inboxes and the ghosts vanished  
instantaneously!

Gosh, that was simple! Why didn't I think of expanding the Inbox?!

Alvin



On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:43 AM, David K Watson wrote:


You are right that you can't rebuild the inbox.  However, expand
the inbox (click on the right-pointing triangle next to the inbox)
and you should be able to rebuild each of the single account
inboxes under the main inbox.  If you rebuilt all your inboxes
and all of your other mailboxes, you'll get back some space and
you won't have the mismatch between messages showing and
actual messages as often.

I also second the idea of checking your mail via the web.  I remember
once having a similar type of problem that was caused because
the message on the server immediately before the ghost message
was corrupted in a way that the mail server couldn't handle.  If
you can, log into your account on the web and try deleting the
ghost messages there as well as anything preceding them
that looks suspicious.

If that doesn't work, I'd try again to move the messages out and
rebuilding the mailbox.  This time try it t for just those messages in
the problem account, and keep holding the mouse down over the
new location when dragging them over until you can see that
Mail is ready to move them, because Mail can be very slow in
moving a lot of messages.  This is particularly true for mailboxes
that haven't been rebuilt in a while.




Mathew,

Thanks for the idea, but when I try to move the messages, they just
bounce back to the Inbox. Also, Mail doesn't allow the Inbox to be
rebuilt (at least on my machine!). It would be interesting if it's
allowable on someone else's machine.

Alvin


On Nov 3, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:


You might try moving all the messages out of the inbox into another
local folder (you can always move them back if you want).  With your
inbox zeroed out, rebuild the mailbox.  Use the web interface for
your mail account to make certain the headers or entire messages are
not still on the server - if they are, delete them there.

Matthew

On Nov 3, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Alvin Auerbach wrote:


ClamXav 1.1.1 looked at Apple's Mail and found 2 incoming messages
that were suspicious, and asked to delete them. I gave the okay,
and the messages were moved to the computer's trash. However, the 2
messages are still listed in the Inbox. box. When I open them, they
are blank - ghosts!

When I delete them, they remain in the Inbox.
When I drag them to another mailbox - Trash, Junk, anything, they
remain in the Inbox.
I used [command-delete]. Didn't work.
I opened the Mail folder in my Home library, and dragged the
INBOX.imapmbox folder to the desktop. Mail created another one, and
the ghost messages remain, and the Messages folder with in the
Inbox folder is empty.
I checked Apple and Google, and found a problem like that with AOL
mail, and the solution was to update the OS. Both my OS and my Mail
program are the latest version.
I found a reference to a similar problem, but their solution was to
change the type of email account.
Rebuild the Mailbox does not apply to the Inbox.
I replaced the app from my Leopard disk.
The message count is often wrong, but I ignored it. Is this a clue?
I save most of my mail, and the size of my Mail folder is 1.45 GB.
Is that a factor?

Does anyone have any ideas on how to exorcise these ghost  
messages?!


Alvin





*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Alvin Auerbach

Michael,

Thanks for the ideas. I tried the previous suggestion first (from  
David K. Watson) and it worked.


Alvin


On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Michael Lewis wrote:


Alvin Auerbach sez:


Mathew,

Thanks for the idea, but when I try to move the messages, they just
bounce back to the Inbox. Also, Mail doesn't allow the Inbox to be
rebuilt (at least on my machine!). It would be interesting if it's
allowable on someone else's machine.

Alvin


Download OnyX for the Mac OS you have:

http://www.titanium.free.fr/index_us.html

According to the thread here http://www.tidbits.com/webx?14@@.3cb7a1fc/
1 it has a selection to force a rebuild of all mailboxes. Check that
thread as there may be some other tips you can try as well.

--
Michael Lewis
Off Balance Productions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.offbalance.com


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Alvin Auerbach

Tom,

Thanks for your suggestions. I'll turn off ClamXav.

David K Watson sez:
You are right that you can't rebuild the inbox.  However, expand
the inbox (click on the right-pointing triangle next to the inbox)
and you should be able to rebuild each of the single account
inboxes under the main inbox.

I tried it, and it worked.

Alvin


On Nov 4, 2008, at 9:20 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:


I opened the Mail folder in my Home library, and dragged the
INBOX.imapmbox folder to the desktop. Mail created another one, and
the ghost messages remain, and the Messages folder with in the Inbox
folder is empty.


1) You should not run antivirus software on your Mac because there  
are no
Mac viruses. What ClamXav spotted were Windows viruses at most. You  
have

no reason to worry about them. They won't spread.

2) You should never allow any antivirus program to mess with your  
email

data. The data structure managed by your email program is complicated.
Your antivirus program hacked at it with no knowledge of how these  
files

are managed. It deleted the contents of a mail file, but may not have
deleted the file itself and it certainly did not adjust the index  
file to
match. So the email program's index is pointing to a file that is  
empty

or not there. Hence a ghost file.

3) Two problem messages out of 1.45 GB of messages. Why are you  
spending

any time on this? The odds are that in messing with this you will make
things much worse. I would leave it alone.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread b_s-wilk
Buy a PCI controller card. The new bus won't have the same size limit as 
the old one. My old Mac's internal bus limits drives to 128GB. The new 
card allowed me to use the 250GB drive internally instead of in an 
external case. If it's a PC, make sure it has adequate ventilation/fan. 
Might be better not to get the fastest drive/RPM. Read the fine print.



If I buy a 1tb external usb drive, will it have the same 120gb limit due to
my motherboard or what?  If yes, then I would hafta divide it up into many
partitions?  My internal drive is a 160gb pata drive which had2 have 40gb
partitioned off to see it.  There's a 2nd hdd internal slot open ...if I
put the 1tb drive in there, what would hafta be done then, multiple
partitions?  Any other solutions?



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread Fred Holmes
It is the interface (SATA or PATA) physically in the external drive case that 
determines what the computer sees when it looks at the hard drive in the 
external case (unless you are exceeding the limit of the OS).  If it is a newly 
manufactured external case, you should have no problem.

But if you are going to purchase a 1 TB hard drive it almost certainly will be 
a SATA drive.  I don't believe I've seen any PATA drives larger than 320 GB for 
sale, although I couldn't for sure say they don't exist.

I also don't believe I've seen any SATA drives that aren't 48-bit LBA.  Maybe 
some very early ones were not.

I would only buy a new, un-partitioned PATA drive today in circumstances in 
which it was being attached to a legacy motherboard or drive case for essential 
reasond.

Fred Holmes

At 11:44 AM 11/5/2008, rlsimon wrote:
If I buy a 1tb external usb drive, will it have the same 120gb limit due to
my motherboard or what?  If yes, then I would hafta divide it up into many
partitions?  My internal drive is a 160gb pata drive which had2 have 40gb
partitioned off to see it.  There's a 2nd hdd internal slot open ...if I
put the 1tb drive in there, what would hafta be done then, multiple
partitions?  Any other solutions?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
Buy a PCI controller card

 If I buy a 1tb external usb drive,

Hey folks, this is a question about an *external* drive. You keep 
providing answers for *internal* drives.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] terabyte

2008-11-05 Thread Tom Piwowar
In fact, I saw a recent article on this.  Infoworld or CNET or something.
The writer went back to his original XP disc to reinstall on the new 1 TB
drive.  Apparently, the original XP could not see anything bigger than 120GB
or so.  So he had to create a slipstreamed XP disk with SP 2 on it.

That is XP (you know, the OS I recently called crappy.) The question is 
about OS X (which is less crappy). I have connected 1TB USB drives to 
OS X with no problems.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Help! Apple Mail Ghosts

2008-11-05 Thread Alvin Auerbach

Betty,

Thanks for your suggestions. This is the first time that I've had such  
a problem.

I'll try Thunderbird when I have some time.

Have you backed up your email files this month? week? ever?
I use Time Machine, so backups are made every hour.

Do you know where the preference/data files are located?
If that is com.apple.mail.plist then yes, I know where it is.

Alvin


On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:57 AM, betty wrote:

I opened the Mail folder in my Home library, and dragged the   
INBOX.imapmbox folder to the desktop. Mail created another one,  
and  the ghost messages remain, and the Messages folder with in  
the Inbox  folder is empty.

...snip...
2) You should never allow any antivirus program to mess with your  
email data. The data structure managed by your email program is  
complicated. Your antivirus program hacked at it with no knowledge  
of how these files are managed. It deleted the contents of a mail  
file, but may not have deleted the file itself and it certainly did  
not adjust the index file to match. So the email program's index is  
pointing to a file that is empty or not there. Hence a ghost file.


This is the best argument I've seen for avoiding Apple's Mail  
program--the data structure is complicated, as in OE. It's not so  
complicated in Mozilla's Thunderbird, so fewer things are likely to  
go wrong. I dumped Apple Mail ages ago after using it for only a  
couple of weeks. Went back and tried it again last week and dumped  
it again.


Have you backed up your email files this month? week? ever? Do you  
know where the preference/data files are located?


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives,  
privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http:// 
www.cguys.org/  **

*



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Odd Time Stamp Problem

2008-11-05 Thread Quentin A. Fisher
Allen - You are exactly right; and MS's support forums show a lot of 
queries on this bizarre piece of engineering!
Question - Can I use convert.exe in Vista to make the WD external drive 
an NTFS? Will it save my data? The drive is about 2/3 full.


Thanks

Quentin Fisher
Bethesda, MD

From: Allen Firstenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Date:Mon Nov 03 12:28:07 CST 2008
Subject: Re: Odd Time Stamp Problem

Your Vista machine is probably using NTFS for its file system.  Your
external drive is probably using FAT32.  NTFS handles DST correctly,
while FAT32 does not.

Solution is to upgrade the external drive to NTFS (or some other real
file system).


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*